Neutropenic fever (NF) has a crude mortality rate of 3–18%. International guidelines recommend that all patients with NF receive ultrabroad-spectrum antibiotics (UBSAs) within 1 hour of emergency department (ED) registration. However, over 70% patients presenting to hospital with suspected NF (sNF) cannot access absolute neutrophil count (ANC) result within 1 hour, do not have NF and do not require UBSAs. In ED and hospitalised patients with sNF, we hypothesise that the ASTERIC protocol effectively and safely reduces the use of UBSAs compared with standard care alone.

This pragmatic, parallel, multicentre, type 1, hybrid effectiveness-implementation, stepped-wedge, before-and-after, cluster randomised controlled trial aims to evaluate whether antibiotic prescribing can be safely reduced through implementing a multifaceted antibiotic stewardship intervention (ASTERIC) in adult patients with sNF presenting to EDs. The sNF was defined as a fever with a single oral temperature of ≥38.3°C (101°F) within 24 hours before ED registration or a temperature of ≥38.0°C (100.4°F) sustained over a 1-hour period, following last chemotherapy or targeted therapy within 6 weeks for any solid tumour, or in any period following therapies against leucaemia, lymphoma, myelodysplastic syndrome, aplastic anaemia, multiple myeloma or recipient of HSCT. The study will involve eight hospitals in Hong Kong with variable baseline practice. We will include 704 adult patients (352 patients in pre-implementation and post-implementation periods, respectively) with sNF (tympanic temperature ≥38.3°C) and 48 staff participants (6 staff participants in each hospital). Healthcare professionals will receive a multifaceted stewardship intervention consisting of risk assessment tools, fast-track ANCs, a decision tool for patient management and antibiotic use, supported by an educational package and staff interaction programmes (ASTERIC protocol). Patients’ blood ANC, and cancer therapy and chronic illness therapy scores will be measured. The RE-AIM (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance) and Proctor conceptual frameworks will be followed for evaluation of implementation. The main outcome measures are the mean total dose of UBSAs prescribed in 7 days and serious adverse events at 30 days. Data analysis will incorporate intention-to-treat, per-protocol and as-treated analyses for service outcomes (effectiveness, safety, quality of life assessments and cost-effectiveness) and mixed methods for implementation outcomes, informed by the Theoretical Domains Framework. We expect that the study results will inform health policy with improvement in hospital services in treating stable sNF, evidenced by improved safe antibiotic stewardship, early antibiotic de-escalation and reduced costs and length of stay.

The institutional review boards of all study sites approved this study. This study will establish the ASTERIC protocol safely improves antibiotic stewardship and clinical management in adult patients with sNF. We will disseminate the findings through peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations and educational activities. All patients with sNF will be influenced by the new protocol which is agreed at hospital level. Randomisation is at hospital level, not patient level. Patient consent is sought for follow-up and data access, not for treatment. Staff consent is sought for interviewing.

NCT06794320.

Cellulitis is a common bacterial skin infection causing significant pain, swelling and impact on daily activities, frequently leading to emergency department presentations and hospital admissions. While antibiotics are the mainstay of treatment, they do not directly address inflammation, often resulting in persisting or worsening symptoms in the initial days. Corticosteroids, with their potent anti-inflammatory effects, have shown benefit in other acute infections but are not currently standard care for patients with cellulitis. This trial aims to determine if adjunctive oral dexamethasone can reduce pain and improve outcomes in adults with cellulitis presenting to UK urgent secondary care settings.

This is a pragmatic, multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised, parallel group, phase 3 superiority trial, with an internal pilot and parallel health economic evaluation. Adult patients (≥16 years) with a clinical diagnosis of cellulitis (at any body site except the orbit) presenting to urgent secondary care will be screened for eligibility. 450 participants will be randomised (1:1) to receive either two 8 mg doses of oral dexamethasone or matched placebo, administered approximately 24 hours apart, in addition to standard antibiotic therapy. The primary outcome is total pain experienced over the first 3 days postrandomisation, calculated using the standardised area under the curve from pain scores (Numerical Rating Scale 0–10) across up to seven timepoints. Secondary outcomes include health-related quality of life (EuroQol 5 Dimension 5 Level), patient global impression of improvement, analgesia and antibiotic usage, hospital (re)admissions, complications, unscheduled healthcare use, cellulitis recurrence and cost-effectiveness at 90 days. The primary estimand will apply a treatment policy approach to intercurrent events.

The trial has received ethical approval from South Central—Oxford B Research Ethics Committee (reference: 24/SC/0289) and will be conducted in compliance with Good Clinical Practice and applicable regulations. Informed consent will be obtained from all participants. A model consent form can be seen in . Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations, and to patient groups and relevant clinical guideline committees.

ISRCTN76873478.

Fibrosis is a pathological feature that can occur in a wide range of diseases including diabetes mellitus. We investigated whether in people with type 1 (T1DM) or type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), glycaemia or diabetes-related complications are associated with fibrotic diseases.

Retrospective cohort study using UK Clinical Resource Datalink (CPRD) Aurum and Hospital Episode Statistics.

We included people with prevalent T1DM or T2DM as of 31 December 2015 (recorded in CPRD Aurum), eligible for linkage with Hospital Episode Statistics and followed up for 3 years.

We defined diabetes status using blood/urine biomarkers and complications. In the T2DM cohort, we also investigated exposures of hyperglycaemia, insulin resistance and metformin prescription. Fibrotic condition diagnoses were determined from both primary and secondary care records. Logistic regression analyses were undertaken to understand the strength of association between diabetes status/diabetic complications and fibrotic conditions, respectively.

The T1DM cohort consisted of 9669 people while the T2DM cohort included 504 066 people. In T1DM, we found that albuminuria was associated with lung fibrosis (ORadj: 2.07, 99% CI 1.35 to 2.17), and microvascular complications were associated with atherosclerosis (ORadj: 1.81, 99% CI 1.18 to 2.77) and cardiomyopathy (ORadj 1.53, 99% CI:1.15 to 2.04). In the T2DM cohort, both glycaemia above target and diabetes complications were associated with most fibrotic conditions.

Within the T1DM population, no consistent association between diabetes status and all fibrotic diseases was observed. More research is required to understand whether the association between diabetes complications and fibrotic diseases is due to shared risk factors or whether glycaemia in T2DM may be influenced by fibrotic pathology.

Hysterectomy, a common surgical procedure, is frequently associated with moderate-to-severe postoperative pain and a high incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). Dexamethasone, a corticosteroid, may help alleviate these symptoms; however, existing evidence is largely drawn from mixed surgical populations and does not specifically address its efficacy and safety in hysterectomy patients. This meta-analysis provides a focused and updated synthesis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in this population, incorporating time-stratified pain outcomes and subgroup analyses by dose, surgical approach, timing and route of administration to evaluate the role of dexamethasone in postoperative recovery.

Systematic review and meta-analysis using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.

PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar and The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) were searched through 1 November 2024.

We included RCTs comparing dexamethasone with placebo for postoperative outcomes in hysterectomy patients.

Two independent reviewers used standardised methods to search, screen and code included studies. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration and Evidence Project tools. Meta-analysis was conducted using random effects models. Findings were summarised in GRADE evidence profiles and synthesised qualitatively.

15 RCTs (1362 patients) were included. Dexamethasone significantly reduced PONV (risk ratio (RR): 0.53, 95% CI 0.47 to 0.61, p2: 0% high certainty) and pain scores at 24 hours (mean difference (MD): –0.20, 95% CI –0.35 to –0.05, p=0.009, I²=0%, moderate certainty), 8–12 hours (MD: –0.60, 95% CI –0.88 to –0.31, p2: 27%, moderate certainty and 4 hours (MD: –0.43, 95% CI –1.07 to 0.21, p=0.19, 93%, moderate certainty). It also decreased the use of rescue antiemetics (RR: 0.57, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.75, I²: 39%, high certainty) and postoperative opioid consumption (standardised MD: –0.48, 95% CI –0.90 to –0.05, p=0.03, I²: 74%, low certainty). The effects of rescue analgesics and hospital stay duration were nonsignificant. Subgroup analyses showed consistent antiemetic efficacy of dexamethasone across doses, timings, routes and procedures. For pain, greater analgesic effects were seen with higher doses and perineural administration, particularly at 8–12 hours. The risk of bias was low in most studies, but evidence of publication bias was observed for the pain score outcome.

Dexamethasone is an effective adjunct in hysterectomy, significantly reducing PONV and postoperative pain at 8–12 and 24 hours, particularly with 4–10 mg doses. Benefits are consistent across routes, timings and surgical approaches, with greater early analgesia after perineural use. It reduces opioid consumption but has a limited effect on rescue analgesia, supporting its role as a complementary analgesic. While generally considered safe, current safety data are limited, highlighting the need for further research. These results support its use in multimodal recovery protocols and identify priorities for future studies in high-risk and diverse surgical populations.

CRD42024608067.

This research paper presents a study protocol for an exploratory clinical trial evaluating the safety and potential efficacy of autologous peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMNC)-loaded injectable cell scaffold (ICS-001) for angiogenic therapy in chronic limb-threatening ischaemia (CLTI). CLTI, the advanced stage of peripheral artery disease, presents significant therapeutic challenges.

Angiogenic therapy using ICS-001 with PBMNCs—a novel approach designed to enhance local cell retention and promote neovascularisation—will be explored. The study will address the pathophysiology of CLTI, the limitations of current treatments and the rationale for cell-based therapies, alongside the clinical trial design for evaluating the safety and efficacy of ICS-001. We hypothesise that ICS-001 will improve ulcer healing and reduce ischaemic rest pain in patients with CLTI. This paper outlines the methodology, including patient selection, CD34⁺ cell mobilisation, scaffold preparation, injection protocols, clinical assessments, data collection and safety monitoring. The anticipated results, discussion and conclusion will offer insight into the clinical significance and potential impact of ICS-001 as a pioneering angiogenic therapy for CLTI.

The institutional review boards of all participating hospitals approved this study protocol (latest version V.6.0, 5 June 2025). Final data will be made publicly available. A report detailing the study results will be submitted for publication in an appropriate peer-reviewed journal.

Data are available on reasonable request. Technical appendix, statistical code is available by contacting the corresponding author. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) licence, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build on this work non-commercially, and licence their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

jRCT2052230115, Japan Registry of Clinical Trials.

Progress at the intersection of artificial intelligence and paediatric neuroimaging necessitates large, heterogeneous datasets to generate robust and generalisable models. Retrospective analysis of clinical brain MRI scans offers a promising avenue to augment prospective research datasets, leveraging the extensive repositories of scans routinely acquired by hospital systems in the course of clinical care. Here, we present a systematic protocol for identifying ‘scans with limited imaging pathology’ through machine-assisted manual review of radiology reports.

The protocol employs a standardised grading scheme developed with expert neuroradiologists and implemented by non-clinician graders. Categorising scans based on the presence or absence of significant pathology and image quality concerns facilitates the repurposing of clinical brain MRI data for brain research. Such an approach has the potential to harness vast clinical imaging archives—exemplified by over 250 000 brain MRIs at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia—to address demographic biases in research participation, to increase sample size and to improve replicability in neurodevelopmental imaging research. Ultimately, this protocol aims to enable scalable, reliable identification of clinical control brain MRIs, supporting large-scale, generalisable neuroimaging studies of typical brain development and neurogenetic conditions.

Studies using datasets generated from this protocol will be disseminated in peer-reviewed journals and at academic conferences.

Adolescence is a critical period marked by rapid brain development and the onset of many mental health disorders. Brain MRI studies during adolescence, especially when paired with behavioural phenotypes and information about genetic risk factors, hold promise to advance early identification of mental health risk and spur the creation of targeted treatments to improve patient function, prognosis and quality of life. However, prospective neuroimaging is costly and time-intensive, and individuals who participate may not be reflective of the general population. These challenges are compounded when examining adolescents, as many families lack the time, energy or resources to participate in studies that use research-grade imaging. Repurposing clinical MRIs obviates many of the challenges of neuroimaging research. Here, we describe the brain-behaviour-genetics study protocol. This protocol describes procedures used to recruit participants with recent high-quality clinical brain MRIs and prospectively acquire genetic and sociobehavioural data, resulting in a highly cost-efficient design that harnesses a vast and underused neuroscientific resource.

The brain-behaviour-genetics protocol aims to recruit 1000 adolescents who have clinical brain MRIs contained in Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia’s electronic health record. One or both parents of the adolescent proband will be recruited when possible. Parents and adolescents will complete a series of self-report scales spanning the domains of mental health, trauma, risk and resilience. Saliva samples will be collected from the adolescent and at least one biological parent, using an at-home saliva collection kit. Subsequent analysis will examine associations between brain development, genetics and behavioural measures in adolescence.

Approval for the study had been obtained from the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia’s institutional review board (IRB #23–0 20 851). Results will be published in peer-reviewed journals.

Intrapartum-related complications are a leading cause of adverse perinatal outcomes, including stillbirths, neonatal deaths and intrapartum-related neonatal encephalopathy (IP-NE). We assessed the prevalence of adverse intrapartum-related outcomes, evaluated the association between IP-NE and obstetric and fetal risk factors, and examined whether emergency referral and emergency caesarean section (CS) modified this association through interaction effects.

Cross-sectional with a nested case–control study.

Two hospitals in rural Eastern Uganda.

Women giving birth to a live or stillborn baby weighing >2000 g between June and December 2022.

We used prospectively collected perinatal e-registry data to assess the prevalence of adverse perinatal outcomes. Logistic regression with interaction with postregression margins analysis was used to determine the association between IP-NE and emergency referral and emergency CS across risk groups of hypertensive disorders, antepartum haemorrhage, prolonged/obstructed labour and birth weight.

Adverse perinatal outcomes were stillbirths, 24-hour neonatal deaths and IP-NE (defined as Apgar score

Of 6550 births, 10.2% had an adverse perinatal outcome: 3.8% stillbirths, 0.6% neonatal deaths and 5.7% IP-NE. Adverse outcomes were higher among neonates whose mothers had antepartum haemorrhage (31.3%) or prolonged/obstructed labour (27.2%) compared with those whose mothers had no complications. Emergency referral and CS did not change the association between IP-NE and obstetric risk, except in prolonged/obstructed labour. Without emergency CS, the predicted probability of IP-NE was 0.73 (95% CI 0.51 to 0.95); with CS, it decreased to 0.45 (95% CI 0.39 to 0.50).

Neonates born to mothers with obstetric complications had low healthy survival rates. Emergency referral and CS did not alter the risks of IP-NE in women with obstetric complications except for obstructed or prolonged labour, highlighting that these interventions may not be implemented with sufficient timeliness or quality, and/or that additional, more targeted strategies beyond referral and CS are needed to address IP-NE.

Hospital falls persist as a major threat to patient safety. This study aimed to develop an interprofessional reference standard to prevent, manage and report hospital falls.

A Delphi consensus methodology, informed by the Conducting and Reporting Delphi Studies guideline, was used to design the reference standard. An interprofessional expert panel (n=47) of health professionals, researchers, policymakers and consumers participated in three Delphi rounds. Following the review of clinical guidelines, an e-Delphi survey was developed and piloted to derive 60 initial items for the standard. Two iterative rounds of e-Delphi surveys were distributed via Research Electronic Data Capture and included free-text questions and 9-point Likert scales. An online consensus meeting followed, to ratify the final standard.

In the first Delphi round, there was over 80% agreement for 44/60 items to be included in the reference standard. This increased to 48/60 items in Round 2. At the final consensus meeting, 12 items still did not reach consensus for inclusion and one was added, yielding 49 items. Items that replicated text according to falls with injury/without injury were combined, resulting in 42 items in the final reference standard. Agreed items included: (1) brief screening of falls risk on hospital admission; (2) comprehensive falls assessment for inpatients who are older, frailer or have complex conditions; (3) single interventions (such as environmental adaptations and exercise); (4) multifactorial interventions; (5) education of patients, families and staff; (6) optimising local falls hospital policies, procedures and leadership capability; (7) optimising documentation and reporting; (8) improving accreditation processes; (9) workforce redesign to augment falls education. Items that did not reach agreement (n=12) pertained to alarms, bed rails, grip socks, artificial intelligence, volunteers and care bundles.

This new reference standard provides a checklist for staff, patients, managers and policymakers to reduce unwanted variations in prevention, management and reporting of hospital falls.

ANZCTR 386960

Most oral cancers in India present in advanced stages and tend to have poor oncological outcomes. Chemotherapy has been associated with improved oncological outcomes in various cancers, but its role in oral cancer is still not well-defined in curative settings beyond radiosensitisation. Despite an excellent response rate, neoadjuvant chemotherapy trials have failed to show an oncological advantage. Earlier studies were limited by their heterogeneous patient population, including all head and neck subsites, and included both inoperable cancer and early-stage operable cases. Due to such patient selection, the intended results were never met. Patients with biologically aggressive diseases (advanced nodal disease) may derive greater benefit from induction chemotherapy (ICT). Therefore, we aim to determine the oncological advantage of adding ICT to oral squamous cell cancer with advanced nodal disease (N2–N3).

The study is an open-label, multicentre, randomised controlled trial, with an allocation ratio of 1:1, being conducted at seven leading cancer centres in India. The primary objective is to compare survival outcomes with and without ICT before surgery in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) and advanced nodal disease, specifically focusing on 2-year disease-free survival (DFS). Secondary objectives include assessing overall survival (OS), clinical and pathological response rates, treatment compliance, treatment completion rates, adverse events, treatment-related toxicity (using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, V.5.0), quality of life (measured with Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Head and Neck) and postoperative complications (using the modified Clavien-Dindo classification).

The study population consists of patients with operable OSCC and advanced nodal disease (N2–N3), adequate organ function, aged 18–65 years and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) of 0–2. The treatment arms are the standard arm Surgery arm (SURG), which involves surgery followed by adjuvant radiotherapy with or without concurrent chemotherapy, and the experimental arm (ICT), in which patients will receive two cycles of ICT using either cisplatin, docetaxel and 5-fluorouracil or cisplatin, docetaxel and capecitabine, followed by surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy with or without concurrent chemotherapy. The sample size was calculated to detect an HR of 0.67 with 80% power. A total of 184 events are required, and with an accrual rate of 15 patients per month, 300 patients will be recruited. DFS analysis will occur 32 months after the trial begins, and follow-up will continue for 5 years. OS analysis will be conducted when 184 deaths are observed. Taking 10% of the withdrawal of consent, a total of 346 patients need to be included.

This trial aims to establish the potential superiority of ICT or definitively determine its futility in OSCC with advanced nodal disease. A positive outcome could provide practice-changing data, particularly for Indian patients, whereas negative results could halt the use of ICT in this setting, directing research efforts towards more effective treatment strategies.

CTRI/2024/03/064586; NCT06737822; Institutional Ethics Committee (IEC) number: AIIMS/IEC/2023/4622 (lead site).

Although lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer deaths in the US, recent advances in early detection and treatment have led to improvements in survival. However, there is a considerable risk of recurrence or second primary lung cancer (SPLC) following curative-intent treatment in patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Professional societies recommend routine surveillance with CT to optimise the detection of potential recurrence and SPLC at a localised stage. However, no definitive evidence demonstrates the effect of imaging surveillance on survival in patients with NSCLC. To close these research gaps, the Advancing Precision Lung Cancer Surveillance and Outcomes in Diverse Populations (PLuS2) study will leverage real-world electronic health records (EHRs) data to evaluate surveillance outcomes among patients with and without guideline-adherent surveillance. The overarching goal of the PLuS2 study is to assess the long-term effectiveness of surveillance strategies in real-world settings.

PLuS2 is an observational study designed to assemble a cohort of patients with incident pathologically confirmed stage I/II/IIIA NSCLC who have completed curative-intent therapy. Patients undergoing imaging surveillance will be followed from 2012 to 2026 by linking EHRs with tumour registry data in the OneFlorida+ Clinical Research Consortium. Data will be consolidated into a unified repository to achieve three primary aims: (1) Examine the utilisation and determinants of CT imaging surveillance by race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status, (2) Compare clinical endpoints, including recurrence, SPLCs and survival of patients who undergo semiannual versus annual CT imaging and (3) Use the observational data in conjunction with validated microsimulation models to simulate imaging surveillance outcomes within the US population. To our knowledge, this study represents the first attempt to integrate real-world data and microsimulation models to assess the long-term impact and effectiveness of imaging surveillance strategies.

This study involves human participants and was approved by the University of Florida Institutional Review Board (IRB), University of Florida IRB 01, under approval number IRB202300782. The results will be disseminated through publications and presentations at national and international conferences. Safety considerations encompass ensuring the confidentiality of patient information. All disseminated data will be de-identified and summarised.

Anxiety and depression are among the top contributors to disability in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA), but little is known about their economic impact. This study estimates the economic burden of moderate to severe symptoms of anxiety and depression among adults in KSA.

A cross-sectional survey was administered via a web panel. Participants were asked to fill out the Patient Health Questionnaire-4 (PHQ-4) for themselves and on behalf of other household members to capture prevalence rates. Those who reported at least moderate symptoms of anxiety or depression filled out a longer survey with questions on healthcare utilisation and productivity losses due to symptoms. These responses were monetised using prevalence rates and population estimates to calculate per-person and total annual costs.

Prevalence estimates are based on responses from 1164 participants on behalf of 3202 Saudi adults. Of these, 269 individuals with symptoms completed the longer survey.

Prevalence of anxiety and depression; healthcare utilisation (medications, outpatient, inpatient) and productivity losses due to absenteeism and presenteeism.

In total, 26.2% reported at least moderate symptoms consistent with anxiety and/or depression. Among those with symptoms, direct healthcare costs due to anxiety and depression averaged Saudi riyal (SAR) 3431.95 per person annually. Indirect costs via absenteeism and presenteeism averaged SAR 9702.87 and SAR 24 577.28 per person assuming that anxiety and/or depression episodes last for 6 months. Summing up the healthcare costs and productivity losses yields a total annual economic burden of SAR 163.3 billion. Absenteeism accounts for 24.8% of this total (SAR 40.5 billion), presenteeism accounts for 62.8% (SAR 102.5 billion) and healthcare resource utilisation accounts for 12.4%(SAR 20.3 billion).

The overall prevalence of anxiety and depression in KSA is estimated at 26.2%. The economic burden associated with these symptoms amounts to SAR 163.3 billion or 4.1% of GDP. Absenteeism and presenteeism costs account for the vast majority of the total, but a large percentage (nearly 60%) also report emergency department visits and unplanned hospital admissions. Evidence-based interventions should be considered to address the health and economic burden of these conditions in KSA.

To compare in-hospital and long-term outcomes between culprit-only percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and multivessel PCI in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock and multivessel coronary artery disease.

Retrospective subgroup analysis of the multicentre Gulf-Cardiogenic Shock registry.

13 tertiary care centres across six Gulf countries (Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Oman, UAE, Kuwait and Bahrain) between January 2020 and December 2022.

961 patients with angiographically confirmed multivessel coronary artery disease who underwent PCI were included from the Gulf-Cardiogenic Shock registry. Patients were divided into culprit-only PCI group (n=792, 82.4%) and multivessel PCI group (n=169, 17.6%). Patients with single-vessel disease were excluded.

Patients underwent either culprit-only PCI (intervention limited to the culprit artery) or multivessel PCI (immediate intervention to both culprit and non-culprit arteries during the same procedure).

The primary outcome was in-hospital all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included reinfarction, cerebrovascular accident, major and minor bleeding events, target lesion revascularisation, target vessel revascularisation, hospital stay duration and freedom from major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs) at 6 and 12 months.

Hospital mortality was comparable between multivessel PCI and culprit-only PCI groups (43.2% vs 46.1%; p=0.493). Freedom from MACCE rates at 6 and 12 months were 62% and 46% for multivessel PCI versus 70% and 49% for culprit-only PCI, respectively (log-rank p=0.711). Subgroup analysis revealed that culprit-only PCI was associated with increased hospital mortality in patients older than 70 years (OR 1.55, 95% CI: 1.01 to 2.39). Multivariable analysis of the interaction between revascularisation strategy and the subgroups revealed that culprit vessel revascularisation was associated with increased mortality in patients with left main disease (OR: 1.99 (95% CI: 1.22 to 3.27), p=0.006) and left anterior descending lesions (OR: 1.54 (95% CI: 1.06 to 2.25), p=0.025).

No statistically significant differences in hospital mortality or long-term MACCE-free survival were observed between culprit-only PCI and multivessel PCI strategies in patients with cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction. However, patients older than 70 years may benefit from a multivessel PCI approach. These findings support current guideline recommendations favouring culprit-only PCI due to reduced procedural complexity while highlighting the need for individualised treatment strategies based on patient age and clinical factors. Further prospective randomised studies are needed to validate these age-specific findings and identify optimal patient selection criteria for each revascularisation strategy.

Many people with psychosis find the world very frightening. It can be difficult for them to do everyday things—for example, walking down a busy street, travelling on a bus or going to the shops. Sometimes, the fears are so great that individuals rarely leave their homes. gameChange virtual reality therapy is designed to reduce this agoraphobic avoidance. In gameChange, users practise going into computerised immersive versions of ordinary situations. A virtual therapist guides users through the programme. A mental health worker also supports people. People normally do six sessions of gameChange, but now they can do more as headsets can be left with many people. We originally tested gameChange with 346 patients with psychosis. People saw a significant reduction in their fears. People with the most severe problems made the biggest improvements. This led to gameChange receiving National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) Early Value Assessment (EVA) approval for its use with patients with psychosis who have severe agoraphobic avoidance. NICE EVA approval is conditional on further evidence generation. We aim to carry out a real-world trial of gameChange used in the NHS. The overall aim is to gather evidence on the four essential areas (clinical benefits on agoraphobia, level of engagement and adherence, healthcare resource use, adverse effects) and the two further supporting areas (health-related quality of life, generalisability) identified in the NICE evidence generation plan for gameChange.

200 patients with psychosis and severe agoraphobic avoidance will be randomised (1:1) to receive gameChange in addition to treatment as usual (TAU) or to a waitlist control group receiving TAU. Assessments will be conducted blind to group allocation at baseline, 8 weeks (end of treatment) and 26 weeks (follow-up). The trial will be embedded in services in at least seven National Health Service (NHS) trusts across England. The primary outcome is agoraphobic avoidance at 26 weeks assessed with the Oxford Agoraphobic Avoidance Scale. The secondary clinical outcomes are agoraphobic distress, paranoia and social contacts. There will be tests of moderation of the main clinical outcome. Treatment acceptability, adverse effects and cost-effectiveness will also be assessed. The target estimand is the treatment policy estimand and all primary and secondary analyses will be carried out incorporating data from all participants including those who do not complete treatment.

The trial has received ethical approval from the NHS Health Research Authority and Health and Care Research Wales (25/WA/0081). A key output will be the evidence needed for a NICE guidance update on gameChange and a clear recommendation concerning future routine use in the NHS.

ISRCTN79060696.

Primary care nurses (PCNs) are the second largest workforce in primary care and play a critical role in facilitating access to coordinated care and reducing health disparities. There is renewed interest in team-based primary care as a solution for health workforce challenges. Some team models enable PCNs (ie, nurse practitioners, registered nurses, licensed/registered practical nurses) to leverage one another’s expertise to work to optimal scope; the extent to which this happens depends on multiple context-dependent factors. We will conduct an umbrella review to synthesise and compare international knowledge syntheses focused on scope of practice enactment (ie., roles and activities) of PCNs in primary care.

We will conduct the umbrella review according to the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocol (PRISMA-P) guidelines, and using the Nursing Care Organization Framework as guidance. We will search a wide range of scientific electronic databases and grey literature sources, and consider articles published in English and French by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development and designated key partner countries for inclusion, with no publication date limits. Two independent reviewers will screen titles, abstracts and full-text articles, and any disagreements will be resolved through discussion or by a third reviewer. We will use the Risk of Bias Assessment Tool for Systematic Reviews to assess the quality and risk of bias in the included systematic and scoping reviews.

Results will be presented in a PRISMA Scoping Review flow diagram. We will synthesise data from included studies in a detailed literature review table and develop visual aids to communicate the shared and unique roles and activities of PCN scope of practice. We will disseminate the results of the review through peer-reviewed publications and conferences related to this field. Ethics approval is not required.