Conectar
Accelerated population aging has driven substantial growth in demand for palliative care services. Such services can effectively enhance the living quality for end-of-life patients through multidimensional interventions. Currently, China lacks a localised experience-oriented quality assessment scale for palliative care, resulting in gaps in service quality supervision. To develop a self-reported measurement for palliative care services, with the foundation in the Senses Framework.
This study developed a scale by extracting core contributors of palliative care experiences through 14 patients and 16 families' narratives. To refine and improve the scale, a total of 19 experts were invited to participate in a two-round Delphi expert consultation. Additionally, an empirical research was conducted, with 380 valid samples from two independent cohorts collected to complete the full psychometric testing of the scale.
The final Palliative Care Experience Scale (PCES) comprises two dimensions: sense of security and belonging, and sense of purpose and significance, with a total of 13 items. The total variance includes 79.26% that is explained by these two factors. Confirmatory factor analysis confirmed a stable factor structure for the PCES. The scale exhibited good reliability, with a total Cronbach' α of 0.937, McDonald' ω of 0.952, and Spearman-Brown corrected split-half reliability of 0.897. Cronbach's α for both dimensions exceeded 0.88. The scale's SEM was 1.50 and MDC95 was 4.16, offering a validated threshold to identify real changes in patients' palliative care experience.
This study developed an assessment scale of palliative care quality based on the Senses Framework, uniquely centred on patient experiences. Validated through robust methodologies, this scale fills a gap in the evaluation of experiential dimensions of palliative care in China, providing a scientific and feasible measurement tool for the continuous improvement of services.
This study addresses the critical gap of a culturally adapted, patient experience-centred tool for evaluating palliative care service quality in China. Its core finding is the successful development and full psychometric validation of the 13-item Palliative Care Experience Scale (PCES). This research provides a reliable tool for palliative care clinical practice and academic research to capture patients' care experience, offers clinicians and administrators a practical instrument to identify service gaps and guide quality improvement, and delivers foundational reference data for policymakers to advance patient-centred palliative care development in China.
We adhered to the relevant EQUATOR reporting guidelines. The development and validation process followed the COSMIN framework for patient-reported outcome measures.
Patients receiving palliative care and familes played an integral role in designing and conducting this study. In Phase I, qualitative data from semi-structured interviews with 14 patients and 16 families helped define core thematic constructs and develop the initial item pool, which ensured the scale's content validity were based on their real-life experiences. In Phase III, we recruited a new, independent cohort of participants to complete the psychometric testing of the scale, providing key data for its validation.
Deficient palliative care coverage and nursing training in Ecuador warrant examining self-efficacy to inform education strategies and strengthen equitable services.
To examine Ecuadorian nurses' self-efficacy in Palliative Care.
A sequential explanatory mixed-methods study was conducted. Convenience samples of nurses completed the Self-Efficacy in Palliative Care Questionnaire and participated in online semi-structured interviews. Descriptive statistics were used for quantitative data. A side-by-side joint display supported integration.
497 nurses completed the questionnaire (90.4% female; 11.47 years of experience). Teamwork scored highest, while communication scored lowest. Eighteen nurses were interviewed (88.8% female; 11.5 years of experience). Participants reported communication difficulties related to emotions, prognosis, denial, collusion of silence and paediatric cases. They expressed strong confidence in pain management but more difficulty with agitation and dyspnoea. Spiritual care was mainly understood as facilitating access to religious figures. Although teamwork was perceived positively, tensions with physicians and an excessive focus on physical aspects were noted.
Quantitative and qualitative findings aligned overall, with dissonances regarding psychological and social communication.
Strengthening communication and comprehensive patient management competencies, as well as addressing interdisciplinary tensions, is necessary to improve and consolidate Palliative Care in Ecuador.
This study adhered to EQUATOR guidelines and used COREQ for qualitative reporting.
No patient or public contribution.
Evidence-based practice (EBP) plays an indispensable role in ensuring the safety and quality of nursing interventions, especially in labor-intensive and technology-dependent clinical environments such as intensive care units (ICUs). However, implementing EBP continues to be challenging due to perennial structural, organisational, and workforce issues. Concepts of implementation science can provide a framework with which to assess and facilitate the integration of factors that drive EBP implementation within ICUs.
To assess the level of EBP implementation within ICUs and examine the barriers and facilitators that drive EBP implementation using the PARIHS framework.
A concurrent mixed method design was utilised. The study was performed in the ICUs of two tertiary hospitals and involved nurses who completed survey questionnaires and participated in focus group discussions and semi-structured interviews. Ethics approval was obtained from relevant research ethics committees.
EBP implementation was low. EBP skills and training need significantly predicted levels of EBP implementation. Factors comprising context and facilitation affected nurses' experiences of implementing EBP, grouped into three themes of Identity, Power Ownership, and Dynamism. Meta-inferences showed that evidence, context, and facilitation can be characterised as a continuum, providing a three-dimensional perspective of implementing EBP.
The PARIHS framework has provided an alternative perspective with which to approach EBP implementation, foregrounding the role of context and facilitation in promoting the uptake of evidence into clinical practice.
Critical care nurses have contributed to the development of the research design and data collection plan.
To evaluate the ‘Countdown to Theatre’ intervention, a co-designed nurse-led approach developed using the COM-B framework to address context-specific barriers and facilitators to preoperative fasting practices.
A prospective mixed-method, pre–post study assessed the intervention's impact on fasting adherence and patient experience.
Participants included children booked for a procedure under general anaesthesia. Adherence was assessed through audited fasting duration, and patient experience was evaluated using caregiver/patient surveys. The intervention was implemented and monitored by nursing staff as a part of a structured quality improvement process. Nurses played a central role in embedding the approach into daily workflows and reinforcing fasting timelines
Over 9 months, 901 observations were undertaken from 774 patients. Fasting duration decreased from 7.6 to 5.7 h (mean difference −1.94; 95% CI −3.04, −0.86). Parent-reported patient experience surveys showed improvement in many areas, including an increase in overall satisfaction (from 44.7% to 68.8%).
The intervention successfully reduced prolonged fasting and improved patient experiences, demonstrating the value of co-designed approaches in addressing evidence–practice gaps in perioperative care.
The principles of co-design, structured implementation and the application of the COM-B framework provide a replicable model for addressing similar challenges in healthcare. The study highlights the pivotal role of nurses in improving perioperative practices, supporting both patient safety and satisfaction. Future research should explore the intervention's applicability across diverse settings and patient populations.
Despite evidence-based guidelines, excessive preoperative fasting remains prevalent in practice. This study demonstrates that a structured, nurse-led intervention can successfully reduce fasting durations and enhance patient experience, reaffirming the nursing profession's capacity to lead meaningful change in perioperative care.
Standards for quality improvement reporting excellence (SQUIRE 2.0).
Patients and caregivers contributed to the co-design of the intervention, ensuring that it addressed practical challenges related to preoperative fasting.
This study sought to explore the relationship between whistleblowing and ethical sensitivity among nurses and midwives working in delivery rooms.
A sequential mixed-methods research design.
Online data collection included 209 participants (quantitative/snowball sampling) via demographic forms and Ethical Sensitivity Questionnaire, and 9 interviews (qualitative) with semistructured questions.
The ethical sensitivity levels of the participants were found to be high. It was determined that the ethical sensitivity levels were higher in individuals who were married, had a bachelor's degree, were midwives, worked in shifts and wanted to make an ethical report in the past but could not do so. Qualitative data showed that the participants were most inclined to report legal violations such as theft, invasion of privacy and abuse of office. It was determined that whistleblowing was usually reported verbally or in writing to senior management; that whistleblowers felt brave but were afraid of possible negative consequences.
Ethical sensitivity was identified as a factor that influences whistleblowing among nurses and midwives working in delivery rooms. In the qualitative phase, participants tended to identify legal violations as whistleblowing triggers and mostly reported such incidents to high-level managers.
This study reveals the hesitancy of nurses and midwives to report, underlining the importance of a supportive health culture—an organizational climate within healthcare institutions that fosters transparency, psychological safety and ethical behavior to promote patient safety and accountability.
The study found that nurses' and midwives' ethical sensitivity influences their whistleblowing behaviours, with most reports directed at managers for legal violations. Fear of sanctions underscores the study's role in enhancing ethical climate and patient safety.
MMAT guidelines were followed.
Nurses and Midwiwes contributed to the results of the research, ensuring that it determined link between Whistleblowing behavior and ethical sensitivity.
To develop and validate the End-of-Life Care Assessment Tool for Dementia (EoLC-ATD).
A methodological study with multiple phases.
Five sub-studies comprising: a review of 90 validated dementia measures to compile an item bank of advanced dementia symptoms; focus groups with registered nurses on advanced dementia symptom identification and relevance of item bank inclusions; Delphi surveys with dementia experts seeking consensus on the EoLC-ATD constructs and items; pilot testing of the EoLC-ATD; and field testing of the EoLC-ATD in persons with dementia.
The item-bank included 180 symptoms, most of which focus group nurses (n = 17) identified as occurring in advanced dementia. Delphi surveys with dementia experts (n = 31) achieved 70% consensus for 25 of 26 EoLC-ATD items. Pilot testing of the EoLC-ATD by two nurses in eight persons with dementia showed good agreement for six constructs (Cohen's Kappa 0.856–0.927) and 26 items (Cronbach's alpha 77.0). An ‘other sympto’ item was included following RN recommendation. The 27-item EoLC-ATD field tested by 17 nurses in persons with dementia (n = 113) accurately identified advanced dementia symptoms (Cronbach's alpha 77.0, p < 0.001). Mortality at 180 days after baseline EoLC-ATD was significant (p < 0.001, area under the ROC curve p = 0.769).
The EoLC-ATD accurately and reliably identified symptoms of advanced dementia.
The EoLC-ATD provides registered nurses with a single measure of advanced dementia symptoms that will help in identifying symptom-responsive palliative care requirements.
The EoLC-ATD will address the current lack of a validated dementia symptom measure for use by aged care home registered nurses to identify unique palliative and end-of-life care needs according to presenting symptoms in persons living with advanced dementia.
STROBE Statement for cohort and mixed methods studies.
An eight-member Expert Advisory Group, which provided guidance and advice throughout the study, was composed of three carers of persons living with dementia, two dementia care clinicians, a dementia care clinical educator, and two dementia clinician researchers.
To describe the experiences of Finnish registered nurses aged 45 and over working during menopause.
Multiple methods study.
The data were collected from Finnish registered nurses aged 45 and over, using two different methods. Quantitative data (n = 3487), collected in January 2023, were analysed using descriptive statistical methods. Qualitative data were collected during the summer of 2023 through individual interviews (n = 23). The participants were recruited from a survey, where registered nurses (n = 3487) who responded to the survey indicated their willingness to participate in the interview study (n = 718). Participants for the interviews were selected through random sampling, and interviews were conducted until saturation was reached. The quantitative data were analysed with descriptive statistics, and qualitative data were analysed using inductive content analysis. The results of quantitative and qualitative data were combined in the discussion section.
Limited attention has been given to understanding the menopause and its consequences on the nursing workforce. Menopause remains a taboo topic, with a perceived divide between genders and generations, even within the healthcare sector. However, peer support from female colleagues of a similar age was considered invaluable. During menopause, nurses did not receive sufficient support from their managers or occupational health services, despite experiencing various challenges. Fatigue, for instance, was reported by 76% of nurses aged 45 and over. Nevertheless, nurses continued working despite their symptoms, as taking sick leave was perceived as difficult.
The consequences of menopause on nursing work are not yet sufficiently recognised within workplaces, or by the leadership and occupational health services. Support for nurses working during menopause seems to be insufficient. Open and informed discussions are needed across various levels of society to increase understanding of the problems of working during menopause.
The research findings can be used to develop improved occupational health and nursing management practices to support the well-being of menopausal nurses in the workplace.
Currently, there is insufficient knowledge about working as a registered nurse during menopause. However, research findings are enhancing our understanding of the impact of menopause on nursing work and the corresponding needs during this period.
The Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (SRQR).
To co-design an information booklet to support adults living with a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) at home.
A sequential, mixed-method approach using Boyd's co-design framework.
A diverse project team led co-design of a PICC booklet based on preferences and PICC management strategies identified through content analysis of interviews with 15 Australian health consumers (January 2022–March 2023) using a qualitative descriptive approach. A draft booklet was developed, reviewed by the team and prototyped, which was evaluated by consumer participants and an external nurse panel, with readability assessed using Flesch Reading Ease and Flesch–Kincaid scores. The project team reviewed feedback, reached consensus on changes and collaborated with designers to produce the final booklet.
Consumer participant strategies were classified into four categories: enhancing coping, taking responsibility and understanding information, modifying life and accessing supports. Two pre-determined categories were included (participant recommendations for PICC education resource content and top tips for living with a PICC). The prototype was evaluated as highly relevant (3.9/4), comprehensive (3.8/4) with an appropriate writing style and visual appeal. Readability scores were 76.1/100 (Flesch Reading Ease) and 6.9 (Flesch–Kincaid grade level). The final booklet contained 13 sections.
A co-design approach successfully created a novel PICC information booklet with positive evaluations.
Provides understanding of consumer information preferences to inform PICC education and offers insight into consumer-developed strategies and knowledge for living with a PICC.
A co-designed PICC information booklet based on consumer knowledge may augment nursing education for people living with a PICC to improve outcomes.
The qualitative component follows the EQUATOR network COREQ guideline. A co-design research reporting standard is not available.
A consumer representative was a member of the project team and contributed to study design, interpretation of findings and development of the booklet and manuscript.
We aim the isolated and combined effects of sedentary behaviour exposure time and physical activity levels on muscle strength in older adults.
This prospective observational cohort study, analytical in nature, using exploratory survey methods and physical performance testing. With 5-year longitudinal follow-up (2015–2020).
A total of 459 older adults participated in the baseline, with a total of 224 being included/located again in the follow-up. We evaluate muscle strength using handgrip tests and sit-to-stand tests. The international physical activity questionnaire was used to measure physical activity and sedentary behaviour. Generalised Estimation Equations tested both independent and combined effects, reporting results as β coefficients and confidence intervals.
Older adults exhibiting low sedentary behaviour displayed enhanced handgrip strength compared to those with high sedentary behaviour. Notably, older adults who were sufficiently active with low sedentary behaviour, sufficiently active with high sedentary behaviour, and insufficiently active with low sedentary behaviour showed increased handgrip strength compared to their counterparts who were insufficiently active with high sedentary behaviour. This trend was consistent for lower limb strength.
Interventions that encourage a reduction in sedentary behaviour and an increase in physical activity are essential to maintain muscle strength among older adults.
The findings of this study underscore the importance of addressing both sedentary behaviour and physical activity levels in clinical interventions aimed at preserving muscle strength in older adults. Routine assessments of physical activity and sedentary behaviour could help tailor personalised exercise programs, potentially enhancing functional independence and reducing the risk of frailty and disability in older patients.
Patients were involved in the sample of the study.
This study was conducted in accordance with the Strengthening Research in Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines.
First, to investigate residential aged care staff's knowledge and understanding of residents after viewing their digital life story. Second, to examine the stability of this knowledge and understanding. Third, to explore staff's self-reported care practices following digital life story viewing.
Australian aged care quality standards include person-centred care practices, although opportunity for residents' identity expression can be limited by the facility environment. Staff cannot implement such practices without first understanding residents' history, preferences, and values.
The study used a convergent mixed methods design.
Residential aged care staff (n = 61) viewed a resident's digital life story and completed a measure of their knowledge and understanding of the resident at pre-test, post-test, and follow-up. At post-test and follow-up, staff were also asked to indicate if viewing the story had improved their interactions and care practices with the resident and to describe changes in their practice. Pre-test, post-test and follow-up scores of the measure were compared using a repeated measures analysis of variance with post hoc comparisons. Qualitative responses were analysed using thematic analysis.
Scores at post-test and follow-up were significantly higher than at pre-test, showing a stable improvement in knowledge and understanding of residents. Staff responses indicated their knowledge and understanding of residents' life story enhanced their care towards the residents.
Watching digital life stories was associated with stable improvements in staff's knowledge of residents, with staff feeling better equipped to personalise care practices.
Digital life stories about aged-care residents may support staff's improved knowledge and understanding of their care-recipients. With such understanding, staff are more equipped to implement person-centred care practices by Australian aged care quality standards.
The study adhered to guidelines for Revised Standards for Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence (SQUIRE 2.0).
No patient or public contribution.
This study aimed to comprehensively examine social and clinical factors contributing to postpartum depression among women in Nepal and identify their perspectives/experiences regarding postpartum mental health.
The explanatory sequential mixed-method study was conducted in two phases. In the quantitative phase, data were collected via survey of 200 postpartum women at immunisation clinics of two hospitals in Kathmandu Nepal. Measures included sociodemographic and perinatal factors and the Edinburgh Postpartum Depression Scale. Regression models were conducted to analyse data. In the qualitative phase, in-depth interviews were conducted with 15 participants having depression scores ≥ 10. Data were analysed using the thematic content analysis method. Qualitative and quantitative findings were integrated using the joint display and the narrative weaving approach to generate results.
Findings show that 28% of postpartum women screened positive for depressive symptoms, requiring referral for further evaluation. Integrated findings indicate that prenatal mental health problems, low birth weight or medical conditions among infants, intimate partner violence, partner substance abuse, and a lack of postpartum social support were major contributors to postpartum depression.
Depression is highly prevalent among women 6–12 months postpartum in Nepal and is associated with several clinical and social factors.
These findings have important implications, emphasising the need for routine screening using validated tools for early identification, timely treatment and referral of women at-risk for postpartum depression. Evidence-based clinical and community initiatives are needed to promote positive outcomes for women and their families.
External experts were consulted for survey questions and qualitative interview guide, then refined those instruments based on their feedback to improve construct validity. The immunisation clinic staff provided input during study design, for participant recruitment and data collection. Key findings were presented to stakeholders to validate the interpretation of findings.
To explore concerns and coping experiences regarding sexual well-being in inflammatory bowel disease and examine the relationship between these concerns and affected individuals' background factors.
Explanatory sequential mixed methods study.
Recruitment flyers (n = 1347) were distributed to individuals attending inflammatory bowel disease outpatient clinics in seven facilities. Participants completed a questionnaire assessing demographics, concerns and coping experiences related to their sexual well-being. Those who provided consent participated in semi-structured online interviews. Quantitative data were analysed descriptively, and qualitative data were analysed using content analysis.
A total of 551 participants completed the questionnaire, and 21 participated in the interviews. Among them, 251 (45.6%) reported experiences of concerns related to romantic relationships and marriage, sexual life, pregnancy, childbirth and childcare. The nature of these concerns varied by background factors: unmarried individuals more often reported relationship concerns; those with surgical or perianal history more often reported sexual concerns; and women, married individuals and individuals with Crohn's disease more often reported pregnancy-related concerns. Coping experiences were categorized as (1) active barrier management, (2) partner and professional support, (3) passive or resignation coping and (4) cognitive reframing.
Sexual well-being is significantly affected among individuals with inflammatory bowel disease. Many participants reported understanding and support from significant others or relied on personal coping strategies; however, others reported an absence of coping experiences. Sharing these findings with individuals with inflammatory bowel disease and healthcare professionals may enhance awareness and promote support strategies to improve these individuals' sexual well-being.
Concerns about sexual well-being are influenced by both clinical and psychosocial factors, including treatment history, life stage and partner relationships. Healthcare professionals should provide individualised and comprehensive care that incorporates the partners and families of individuals with inflammatory bowel disease to better address sexual well-being.
This study presents the first large-scale mixed methods evidence on how individuals with inflammatory bowel disease experience sexual well-being, providing direct implications for improving quality of life. By illustrating both adaptive and absent coping strategies, the findings contribute essential insight to inform patient-centred clinical practice and psychosocial care.
The Good Reporting of a Mixed-Methods Study (GRAMMS) guidelines were followed.
No patient or public contribution.
To compare attitudes and perceptions towards opioid use disorder among people with opioid use disorder and emergency providers, describe interactions between the two groups, and identify barriers to providing and receiving care.
Mixed methods observational study.
Participants were recruited from an academic, tertiary care hospital and a community-based harm reduction agency in New England. Emergency healthcare providers (nurses, physicians, and paramedics) and adult people with opioid use disorder were enrolled. Electronic surveys were administered to providers, and semi-structured interviews were conducted with people with opioid use disorder and a subset of providers. Descriptive statistics were calculated for surveys, and directed content analysis was used to analyse semi-structured interviews.
Sixty-eight providers completed the survey, 11 of whom also completed a semi-structured interview. Twenty-two people with opioid use disorder completed the semi-structured interview. Both providers and people with opioid use disorder agreed that addiction is a disease; however, opinions differed on the extent to which personal choice played a role in the onset of opioid use disorder. Participants described how factors such as experiencing homelessness, alongside other personal or familial challenges, contributed to ongoing substance use and presented barriers to accessing healthcare. There was discordance in priorities between providers and people with opioid use disorder, which often drove conflict and perceived stigma. Both groups described physical and emotional trauma from prior interactions, which shaped expectations of future interactions and biases towards each other.
Educational initiatives should arm providers not only with clinical knowledge about opioid use disorder but with skills to recognize implicit biases, navigate unique barriers related to social determinants of health, and effectively deploy shared decision-making techniques. Healthcare organizations should provide support for trauma that emergency care providers are exposed to in caring for people with opioid use disorder.
Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative studies (COREQ)–32 item checklist.
This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct, or reporting.
This study examines the relationships between wage satisfaction, union perceptions, expectations, and union membership among Turkish nurses, identifying factors associated with union participation.
Sequential explanatory mixed-methods design.
This two-phase study (January–July 2023) included: (1) a quantitative survey of 210 nurses assessing wage satisfaction, union perceptions, and expectations, analysed using regression and PROCESS Macro (Model 4); and (2) qualitative interviews with 22 nurses, including 15 with union leadership experience, analysed through thematic analysis using MAXQDA.
Quantitative findings indicated that wage satisfaction was associated with nurses' perceptions of unions but did not independently predict union expectations. The study hypothesises that union perception functions as a key mediating mechanism, translating wage dissatisfaction into expectations for union action. Qualitative findings supported this pattern, showing that although wage dissatisfaction was widespread, nurses' expectations were primarily shaped by perceptions of unions' transparency, political independence, democratic participation, and representational capacity rather than by wages alone.
Union participation among nurses is influenced by both economic conditions and normative evaluations of unions. While wage dissatisfaction provides an important contextual background, expectations and engagement are mainly driven by perceptions of union credibility, fairness, and representational effectiveness.
Nursing unions should prioritise transparent governance, democratic participation, and political independence to enhance trust, member engagement, workforce stability, and quality of care.
This study addresses persistent wage dissatisfaction alongside declining union membership and trust. The findings demonstrate that union engagement depends not only on economic dissatisfaction but also on perceived representational fairness. The results are particularly relevant for nursing unions, professional organisations, and policymakers aiming to strengthen union legitimacy and workforce engagement in healthcare systems.
Compliant with COREQ guidelines and mixed-methods reporting standards.
No patient or public contribution.
To investigate what works when using Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs), for whom, in what contexts, and why in four Value-Based Healthcare (VBHC) programmes.
Realist evaluation.
Evaluation of Heart Failure, Parkinson's Disease, Epilepsy and Cataract surgery programmes using data from a scoping review, documentary analysis, questionnaires, quantitative routinely collected data and semi-structured interviews with staff, patients and carers (July 2022–August 2023). Programme theories and logic models were developed, tested and refined.
We conducted 105 interviews (67 patients, 21 carers and 17 staff) and collected data from 230 patients (66 Epilepsy, 140 Heart Failure and 24 Parkinson's Disease) and 14 staff via questionnaires. Clinicians used PROMs data to regularly monitor patients with Heart Failure and Epilepsy, which resulted in better triage and tailoring treatment, prioritisation of access based on the urgency of need, and facilitation of referral to relevant professionals. In Heart Failure, this further resulted in a more efficient provision of care and better use of resources, care closer to home, improved health outcomes (e.g., better symptom management) and service redesign. The same was not observed in Epilepsy, as patients who required mental health treatment had to be referred, but they were not always able to access specialist services. PROMs were discontinued in Cataract surgery services mainly due to the lack of integrated IT systems, which caused an increased workload and staff resistance. In Parkinson's Disease, patients were asked to complete PROMs even though the information was not consistently being used.
Findings challenge the orthodoxy that implementing PROMs is universally good and brings about real improvements in patient outcomes in a VBHC context. PROMs are generally ill-suited for long-term use with patients in routine care without further adaptation. Greater staff and patient involvement are imperative to enhance the acceptability and relevance of the programmes.
Patient-Reported Outcome Measures can improve care when embedded in well-supported systems. Implementation must be realistic, involve staff and patients, and be underpinned by clear leadership and robust digital infrastructure. Co-designed patient-facing tools can improve accessibility and engagement.
What problem did the study address? There is limited evidence on how Patient-Reported Outcome Measures function across different routine healthcare contexts. What were the main findings? Patient-Reported Outcome Measures improved care in Heart Failure but not in other services, largely due to contextual barriers. Where and on whom will the research have an impact? Findings are relevant for clinicians, service designers, and policymakers seeking to implement meaningful person-centred outcome measurement in long-term conditions.
We adhered to Realist and Meta-narrative Evidence Syntheses: Evolving Standards II guidance and to the Guidance for Reporting Involvement of Patients and the Public.
The study was developed alongside a wide range of patient and public stakeholders involved in the Aneurin Bevan University Health Board Value-Based Healthcare programme, third sector and specific individuals and groups representing the four included services (i.e., St. David's Hospice Care, British Heart Foundation, Digital Communities Wales, Epilepsy Action, Digital Communities Wales, Parkinson's UK Cymru, Race Equality First, Aneurin Bevan Community Health Council, Value- Based Healthcare Patient Reference Group and Wales Council of the Blind). A total of 10 virtual meetings were strategically planned to address gaps, assist in the interpretation of findings, and ensure that outcomes were pertinent and accessible to the specific needs and circumstances of under-represented or vulnerable groups.
To explore the views of health care professionals involved in initiatives that have led to successful research-related roles for nurses and midwives working in community settings.
A sequential mixed-methods study.
Between December 2022 and January 2023 a survey was completed by health care professionals with relevant experience of successful research-related initiatives for nurses and midwives in community settings. Survey responses were categorised into low, medium or high-priority examples of productive practice. Nineteen of the twenty responders who provided high-priority examples were interviewed between May and July 2023. The research capacity development for impact framework underpinned data collection and analysis. Data were thematically analysed using the framework method.
The seven themes of the research capacity development for impact framework: leadership and sustainability, skills and confidence building, infrastructures, linkages and collaborations, ownership and responsibilities, actionable dissemination and co-production were identified as important features of successful research-related roles in community settings. A new cross-cutting theme of trust and relationships was generated. The initiation, continued growth and ambition continuum guided the development of the planning change and features of success template.
This study highlighted the key features that matter when planning change and developing research-related roles for nurses and midwives in community settings.
Study findings have the potential to inform policy and practice for organisations focused on developing research capacity and capability in community settings.
This study adhered to the COREQ reporting guidelines.
No patient or public involvement.
Investigate if UK healthcare professionals have the resources and knowledge to provide cardiovascular prevention and rehabilitation to people with ischaemic non-obstructive coronary artery disease (INOCA), and explore what type of care healthcare professionals believe patients should receive.
Electronic cross-sectional survey of UK healthcare professionals, circulated between 7 January and 7 March 2022.
Quantitative data were analysed descriptively. Qualitative data were analysed inductively.
Healthcare professionals lacked knowledge and capacity to care for this patient group. Healthcare professionals recommended patients receive two unsupervised sessions per week, for 8 weeks, at home and in person. Recommend include physical activity advice/exercise training, health behaviour support, psychological support, smoking cessation, dietetics/nutritional support, weight management, counselling and medication titration.
In the UK, healthcare professionals lack resources and knowledge to provide cardiovascular presentation and rehabilitation to people with INOCA. Recommended care reflected care currently available to other patient groups.
There is a need to create and evaluate educational material for healthcare professionals.
Before people with INOCA are offered cardiovascular prevention and rehabilitation it was necessary to determine if healthcare professionals had sufficient clinical knowledge and resources to provide care. We conclude that additional training and resources are required to enable health professionals to deliver care to people with INOCA.
Researchers should create and evaluate educational material for cardiovascular prevention and rehabilitation programmes. Programmes also require additional resources to deliver care to this group.
Reporting adheres to the Cherries guidelines.
A patient (SB) was consulted on study design, data collection, and interpretation, and manuscript preparation.
To better understand what enables evidence-based practice, this study investigated contextual factors influencing evidence-based practice in general, and in relation to the implementation of bladder-monitoring guidelines in orthopaedic care.
Convergent parallel mixed method.
This study was part of a hybrid research project across 17 Swedish orthopaedic sites. The data collection (2021–2023) included interviews with orthopaedic staff and patients post-hip surgery, patient survey free-text responses, and a staff survey on organisational context. Data were analysed with deductive content analysis and descriptive statistics, later integrated using a mixed methods approach.
Evidence-based practice was supported by context factors such as staff collaboration and multiprofessional engagement. Staff addressed patient safety and equality by using evidence-based guidelines, but rarely involved the patients. Orthopaedic fast-track procedures positioned patients as passive recipients, while staff voiced a call for a more person-centred context. Positive attitudes, leadership engagement, use of champions, and adequate staffing enabled evidence-based practice, though a shortage in evaluation and high staff turnover hindered its implementation.
Orthopaedic context is characterised by several enabling organisational context factors for evidence-based practice, although patients lacking recognition of their needs and queries justify greater focus on person-centredness and mutual information exchange. Audit and feedback are crucial for improvements, but were lacking in the orthopaedic care context.
Assessments of efforts made to implement evidence-based practice and its outcomes should incorporate nursing care. Slimmed care processes require attention to ensure patient participation.
The orthopaedic care context is enabling for evidence-based practice, although staff are challenged by fast-track procedures with extensive information exchange and insufficient person-centredness.
The Mixed Methods Reporting in Rehabilitation & Health Sciences checklist.
No patient or public contribution.
Identifier: NCT 04700969
This study aimed to investigate factors influencing the acceptance of smartphone applications among high-risk pregnant women in the Lao People's Democratic Republic to support continuous care.
An explanatory sequential mixed-methods design.
The quantitative phase included 167 high-risk pregnant women recruited from four tertiary hospitals in Vientiane, Lao PDR. Validated questionnaires were used to measure demographics, digital technology usage, eHealth literacy and anxiety. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and multiple regression analysis. In the qualitative phase, in-depth interviews with 20 women were conducted to further explore experiences, perceptions and barriers related to smartphone application usage. Interviews were analysed via direct content analysis.
Quantitative findings indicated that smartphone application acceptance was significantly predicted by eHealth literacy (B = 1.53, 95% CI 1.22–1.84, p < 0.001) and pre-existing non-communicable diseases (B = 4.39, 95% CI 1.05–7.73, p = 0.010). Anxiety negatively impacted acceptance (B = −0.28, 95% CI −0.51 to −0.05, p = 0.019). The model explained 53.9% of the variance in smartphone application acceptance (R 2 = 0.539). Qualitative findings highlighted four key themes: awareness of pregnancy risks, unclear health information, perceived benefits of smartphone applications including accessibility and emotional reassurance and practical barriers such as internet costs and limited digital literacy.
Positive perceptions of smartphone applications regarding accessibility and reassurance were observed, alongside significant barriers, such as limited digital literacy and internet costs. Addressing these factors may enhance the adoption and effective utilisation of digital health technologies among high-risk pregnant populations.
No patient or public contribution.
To identify implementation strategies that effectively facilitate the adoption of social needs care coordination activities using enabling technologies among care management teams serving patients in community-based health centres.
Modified Delphi process.
Discrete, feasible implementation strategies were identified through literature review and semi-structured interviews with care management staff and subject matter experts in clinical informatics, workflow redesign, and product engineering. A modified Delphi was conducted with eight subject matter experts and nine health centre care management staff. Iterative rounds of online surveys were used to achieve consensus on the most relevant implementation strategies and their delivery methods.
The modified Delphi process achieved consensus on nine discrete implementation strategies needed to advance care management teams' ability to screen, refer and track social needs. Prioritised strategies included developing champions, enhancing quality improvement capacity, training staff on using enabling technologies and providing tailored technical assistance for workflow refinement. Consensus was also reached on a monthly cadence for most of the implementation strategies.
Consensus was reached on strategies to enhance care management teams' implementation of social needs screening, referrals and tracking using enabling technologies. These strategies will comprise an intervention to be pilot tested, refined and assessed in a cluster randomised clinical trial.
Findings from this study will inform the development of strategies to further the adoption of enabling technologies to support social needs care coordination.
This work is key to the design of a type 2 hybrid implementation-effectiveness trial that will assess whether user-informed, evidence-based implementation strategies can improve care management teams' adoption of enabling technologies to facilitate social needs care coordination for patients.
The research team includes a patient advisor with community-based nursing expertise and a nurse practitioner-clinical informaticist leader who was involved in data collection and interpretation of findings.
Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov registration # NCT06489002. Registered July 5, 2024, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06489002?term=NCT06489002&rank=1.
FreshRSS 