Conectar
To identify facilitators and barriers to quality, equitable discharge teaching by paediatric emergency department nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic, describe impacts of inequitable discharge teaching, and identify potential solutions to the barriers.
Twenty-two nurses in a single urban paediatric hospital participated in individual interviews from January to April 2022 via phone or videoconference. Interviews were transcribed and analysed using an inductive codebook.
Six barriers to equitable discharge teaching were identified: ED overcrowding, travel nurse training/knowledge, burnout and stress, increased role complexity, COVID precautions, and resource bottlenecks. Two facilitators were also identified: engagement and effective communication. Nurses described the impacts of these barriers along with proposed solutions to improve discharge teaching.
The COVID-19 pandemic created additional barriers to discharge teaching in the paediatric emergency department. Nurses identified barriers and facilitators, the impacts on patients and families, and potential solutions to improve equitable discharge teaching.
This study identifies how periods of high patient volumes or frequent process changes during a pandemic exacerbate inequities in discharge teaching.
This study identifies barriers and facilitators that shaped nurses' ability to provide quality, equitable discharge teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic and offers actionable guidance for hospital leaders and health systems to improve discharge teaching and enhance emergency preparedness for future public health crises.
This study conforms to the Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research.
This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct, or reporting.
ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04676490
To explore the perceptions of older female caregivers living in poverty in a high-income country regarding their health and self-care needs.
Descriptive qualitative study.
Seventeen semi-structured interviews were conducted with older female caregivers between October 2023 and March 2024. The reflexive thematic analysis method described by Braun & Clarke was followed, and ATLAS.ti 25 software was used for data analysis.
The analysis identified one main overarching theme, ‘Caring as an expected role that shapes identity and daily life’ and two interrelated themes: (1) ‘The need for a holistic approach to self-care’ and (2) ‘Caring on empty in the context of economic hardship and limited support’.
Self-care among older female caregivers living in poverty is constrained by caregiving expectations and socioeconomic disadvantage. Addressing their health needs requires nursing interventions that recognise caregiving as a central element of their lives and adopt holistic, context-sensitive approaches.
Nursing interventions should comprehensively assess older female caregivers' multidimensional health needs and enhance access to integrated support and services, addressing structural gender and socioeconomic inequities to strengthen health, dignity, and resilience.
Living in poverty exacerbates the challenges older female caregivers face in attending to their own health and self-care, increasing the risk of exhaustion, distress, and chronic illness. Recognising and addressing these needs through equitable, targeted interventions is essential to reduce health inequalities.
The study has been reported following the COREQ guidelines.
Limited patient and public involvement was incorporated, focusing on verification of their transcripts, ensuring accuracy and credibility in the interpretation of their accounts.
To explore the perceived effectiveness, impact and benefits of a work-based cancer survivorship peer support programme for healthcare employees who have experienced or are experiencing cancer.
A qualitative descriptive study.
Purposive sampling was used to recruit 33 participants (10 peers, 12 peer supporters, 4 line managers and 7 members of the governance group). Data were collected between October 2024 and February 2025 through individual interviews and focus groups. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.
Four themes were generated: Programme Reach and Adoption, Implementing the Programme, Programme Effectiveness and Impact and Programme Maintenance and Growth. Challenges included the pilot status of the programme impacting awareness and uptake, potential reluctance to share diagnoses and the impact of cancer on colleagues. The approach of peer supporters was considered central to the programmes' success. Peer supporters valued training and continuous practice development opportunities.
Demonstrated benefits, including satisfaction and the value of peer support, were evident. To ensure programme maintenance, increased recruitment and training of peer supporters and clear communication regarding the programme and referral pathways are essential. Financial support is required to maintain training and address dissemination challenges.
Work-based peer support programmes can help cancer survivors reintegrate into the workforce more effectively, rebuilding confidence, fostering resilience and navigating workplace expectations. Enhanced staff well-being may also positively influence retention, performance and health-related disruptions.
Findings from this underexplored area of work-based peer support within a healthcare setting have the potential to influence healthcare leaders, policy makers and future research. Improving staff's' quality of life on return to work benefits the individual, the organisation and care delivery by ensuring a healthy, supported workforce.
The Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (SRQR) checklist and the Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TiDieR) checklist were utilised.
No patient or public contribution.
To conduct a scoping review of nurse-led Knowledge Translation strategies aimed at promoting and enhancing patient safety in hospital settings.
Scoping review.
This review followed the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology and was reported according to PRISMA-ScR.
Twelve electronic databases and additional grey literature sources were searched for studies published between 2002 and 2023, with no language restrictions.
From 23,691 records identified, 59 studies were included. The majority (n = 56) employed multifaceted Knowledge Translation strategies, incorporating simulation, audits, digital tools and interprofessional education. The interventions focused on patient safety-related events, including falls, pressure injuries and catheter-associated complications. Nursing leadership emerged as a key component, particularly in team training, developing care protocols and delivering feedback. Outcomes included reductions in adverse events, improved adherence to clinical guidelines and cost savings. Yet, sustaining behaviour changes over time and limited interprofessional and family engagement remained recurrent challenges.
Nurse-led Knowledge Translation strategies were heterogeneous, with increasing use of simulations, technologies and multifaceted approaches. Evidence suggests potential associations with fewer adverse events, improved care quality, individualized planning and cost efficiency. Challenges related to the sustainability of interventions persist. Findings underscore the importance of investing in nursing leadership and capacity-building to strengthen patient safety.
Strengthening nurse-led KT capacities may enhance evidence-based care and improve safety outcomes. Investment in leadership and tailored implementation is critical.
What problem did the study address? The limited synthesis of how nurses lead KT strategies to improve patient safety in hospitals. What were the main findings? Most strategies were multifaceted, context-sensitive and associated with improved care processes and safety indicators. Where and on whom will the research have an impact? Findings are relevant to hospital nurses, nurse educators, managers and health systems seeking to implement evidence-informed safety interventions.
This scoping review followed the PRISMA-ScR reporting guideline.
This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct or reporting.
Open Science Framework (OSF); registration identifier: 10.17605/OSF.IO/K3VJC
To explore how chronically ill patients, family members and nurses perceive and experience patient participation in nursing care within a Chinese hospital context.
Focused ethnography.
The study was conducted in a Chinese public hospital over 8 months between February and September 2021. Data were generated through 90 h of participant observation and 30 semi-structured interviews, including individual and dyadic interviews with 10 nurses, 17 patients and 7 family members. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis through an inductive and iterative process.
An overarching theme ‘participation as relational, holistic and dynamic’ was developed, comprising three themes: (1) participation as fulfilling individual responsibility, (2) family members as co-participants and (3) participation as an evolving multidimensional practice. These themes suggest that participation was understood as a relational responsibility enacted through everyday interactions. Family members were actively involved in care processes, and participation extended across physical, intellectual and emotional dimensions. Digital information and technologies further reshaped participation, creating new opportunities and tensions in everyday care.
Patient participation in nursing care extends beyond autonomy-based models and is shaped by relational responsibilities, family involvement and evolving digital healthcare contexts.
To promote patient participation, policies and practices should recognise relational and family-based dimensions of care. Healthcare organisations should foster environments that support collaborative participation among patients, families and nurses. Training and education should be developed to promote nurses' digital literacy, cultural competence, ethical sensitivity and relational communication to support participation in contemporary care contexts.
This study broadens prevailing autonomy-centred understandings of patient participation by demonstrating how participation is co-constructed through relational responsibilities and family involvement. The findings offer insights for nursing practice and policy in culturally diverse and increasingly digital healthcare environments.
COREQ.
No Patient or Public Contribution.
To identify and describe the current literature on neurodivergence in nursing and to identify existing gaps in knowledge.
Scoping review guided by Joanna Briggs Institute scoping review guidelines and PRISMA-Scoping Review framework.
Comprehensive search with inclusion following Participants, Concept, and Context framework: nurses or nursing workforce; neurodiversity or neurodivergence defined as autism, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, dyslexia; workplace environment. Articles were screened and data extracted by independent reviewers. Dates of inclusion were 1999–2025. Data analysed through descriptive categorisation.
MEDLINE (PubMed), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), and PsycINFO (Ovid) were searched in April 2025, followed by reference mining and citation cross-referencing. Inclusion criteria were set for empirical studies, reviews, or textual evidence (expert opinions or narratives).
Twenty-two sources met inclusion criteria. Most addressed dyslexia and neurodiversity. Sources described strengths of neurodivergent nurses (e.g., deep focus, relationality, novel perspectives), workable challenges (e.g., documentation and multitasking). Studies reported adaptations at multiple levels: individual, interpersonal, and intraprofessional, noting system influences of medical model framing and gender bias in diagnosis.
Literature on neurodivergent nurses in the workplace is scarce. Neurodivergence offers strengths and challenges, yet ableism and limited research restrict well-being and professional advancement.
Greater recognition of neurodivergence in nursing could enhance workforce retention, innovation, and inclusivity. Neurodivergent nurses' perspectives should inform research, workplace design, and professional development.
What problem did the study address?: Limited research on neurodivergence in nursing despite growing awareness of neurodivergence generally and overall challenges in nursing retention and well-being. What were the main findings?: Literature encompasses empirical studies and textual evidence presenting strengths and challenges for nurses. Adaptation centered on the individual. Where and on whom will the research have an impact?: Researchers to increase empirical studies on neurodivergent nurses, including participatory methods; Leaders interested in workplace inclusion, sustainable workplaces, and professional innovation; Neurodivergent nurses and policy-makers concerned with workforce rights and healthcare resilience.
No Patient or Public Contribution.
To explore how children, caregivers and healthcare providers experience shared decision-making in real time within an interdisciplinary paediatric feeding clinic in multicultural Singapore.
A qualitative ethnographic approach was used.
Data collection involved one-time participant observations of interdisciplinary feeding clinic consultations, observations of healthcare providers-only debrief and follow-up interviews with caregivers. Data were collected from July 2024 to November 2024. Participants included caregivers, healthcare providers and otherwise well children presenting with feeding difficulties. Fieldnotes, including observational matrices, reflexive journals and interview transcripts, were analysed thematically using Braun and Clarke's six-step process for thematic analysis.
Twenty observations and 11 interviews were conducted. Four themes were identified: (1) Centring the child: building trust and respect; (2) Tensions and teamwork: negotiating expertise and expectations; (3) Feeding across cultures; and (4) Parenting under pressure: the social context of feeding choices.
In an interdisciplinary feeding clinic, shared decision-making extends beyond the clinical encounter, reflecting relational, cultural and structural realities. The feeding clinic modelled effective shared decision-making through child-centred care practices, balancing biomedical expertise with lived experiences, actively engaging caregivers and codesigning culturally responsive and sustainable feeding strategies with the family. However, divergent perceptions of what problematic feeding entails, caregivers' hesitancy in taking on an active role in consultations, and the external pressures caregivers contended with constrained this process. These findings highlight the need for inclusive, culturally responsive care models and more caregiver support interventions that acknowledge the full complexity of feeding care.
Nurses, with their central role in relational and communicative care, are uniquely positioned to bridge tensions between medical paternalism and collaborative, family-centred approaches. By facilitating trust, clarifying goals and supporting caregiver participation in feeding decisions, they play a critical role in advancing child health outcomes while strengthening caregiver agency within multicultural healthcare systems.
This study revealed how cultural, familial and systemic pressures shape caregiving practices, often constraining caregiver participation and shared decision-making in clinical encounters. Shared decision making in an interdisciplinary feeding clinic comprised of child-centred care practices, balancing biomedical expertise with lived experiences, actively engaging caregivers and codesigning culturally responsive and sustainable feeding strategies with the family. This study expounds on the potentially critical role nurses could play within the multidisciplinary team to negotiate expectations, foster caregiver agency and contribute to culturally responsive, family-centred feeding care.
The reporting of this study is guided by the Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (SRQR).
This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct or reporting.
To achieve expert consensus on key organizational variables and categories of organizational interventions considered most relevant for promoting nurses' organizational well-being.
An e-Delphi study.
Three panels of experts were enrolled: nursing managers, clinical nurses and occupational psychologists. Eight variables from the Nursing Organizational Well-being model and six categories of intervention drawn from the literature were rated for perceived usefulness, applicability and organizational feasibility. Consensus was defined with thresholds for percentage agreement (≥ 75%; ≥ 85%), Content Validity Ratio (CVR ≥ 0.49) and Coefficient of Variation (CV < 0.5).
Eighty-four experts took part in Round 1, and forty-four in Round 2. The organizational variables with the most stable consensus were professional autonomy, workload, support from colleagues and superiors, with agreement > 90% and CV < 0.2. Among the areas of intervention, there was high consensus on organizational support. Mindfulness, meditation, yoga and digital interventions, although supported by literature, did not achieve a stable consensus.
This study identified organizational variables and areas of intervention that achieved stable expert consensus and can guide future organizational planning and empirical evaluation, rather than prescriptive recommendations, to improve nursing organizational well-being.
What problem did the study address? There is a lack of agreement on which organizational variables and areas of intervention should be a priority to support the organizational well-being of nurses, despite the extensive and heterogeneous literature on this topic. What were the main findings? Nurses, nursing managers and occupational psychologists agreed that: Organizational and work support, as well as educational/training were the most rated areas for intervention. Experts rated professional autonomy, workload and peer and supervisory support as priority areas in influencing nurses' well-being. Already noted interventions, such as mindfulness or yoga, did not reach consensus. Where and on whom will the research have an impact? The study results, highlighting shared priorities among experts, can inform nursing managers, organizational leadership and policymakers and guide organizational decision-making processes in designing future interventions. Professional autonomy, organizational support and working conditions emerged as shared expert priorities that may inform organizational reflection on nurses' well-being and workplace sustainability.
The study was conducted according to the Accurate Consensus Reporting Document (ACCORD) guidelines.
This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct or reporting.
To explore mental health help-seeking behaviours among East Asian American dementia caregivers and construct a theory grounded in their behaviour patterns.
Qualitative using constructivist grounded theory design.
We recruited 20 East Asian American dementia caregivers between August 2023 and March 2024 using purposive sampling. We conducted one-on-one interviews and analysed the data using constructivist grounded theory coding.
We constructed a theory including six concepts and 22 categories. While ‘providing care’, caregivers manage caregiving tasks and personal life, experiencing caregiving challenges. ‘Individual capacity’ is a key to perceiving caregiving situations and ‘considering seeking support’. Various factors can affect ‘using support’. Different types of support can be used separately or in combination. When receiving adequate support, caregivers can ‘gain benefits from support’. These benefits, alongside individual capacities, can shape caregivers' ‘outlook on the present and the future’.
This study explains the mental health help-seeking process within East Asian culture, broadening perspectives on diverse populations and highlighting insights into culturally tailored services.
This study offers clinicians and communities insights into the mental health help-seeking process among East Asian American dementia caregivers and highlights strategies to encourage their use of mental health services.
This theory incorporates aspects of East Asian culture, addressing a research gap in studies of Asian Americans. It may enhance understanding of culturally tailored approaches and facilitate future funding for research and services, considering cultural diversity.
The Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research.
No Patient or Public Contribution.
To explore the impact of community-based long-term care (LTC) on self-rated and observer-rated health (ORH) among older adults in China.
Cross-sectional observational study using repeated cross-sectional data from the Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey (2011, 2014 and 2018).
Multivariate regression models were employed to examine the association between community-based LTC and both self-rated and ORH among older adults. Robustness was assessed using objective health indicators and alternative model specifications. Propensity score matching was used to minimise selection bias. Subgroup analyses were conducted by age, gender, living arrangement and urban versus non-urban residence.
Community-based LTC was significantly associated with higher self-rated health and higher ORH among older adults. Robustness checks using objective measures—such as hypertension and activities of daily living—and alternative analytic strategies confirmed these findings. The beneficial effects were more pronounced among women, those aged 75 and above, those living alone and urban residents.
Community-based LTC significantly improves both subjective and objective health outcomes among older adults in China. The effects are particularly strong for women, those aged 75 and above, those living alone and urban residents, highlighting the importance of targeting vulnerable groups.
Expanding and improving community-based LTC is essential for meeting the diverse needs of China's ageing population. These findings provide valuable insights for nursing professionals and health policymakers working to promote healthy ageing.
This study demonstrates that community-based LTC improves health outcomes among older adults in China. The results offer important guidance for nursing practice and health policy supporting healthy ageing, especially in rapidly ageing societies.
This study adheres to the STROBE guidelines for reporting observational studies.
This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct, or reporting.
To investigate the impact of parenting stress in both fathers and mothers on the quality of life (QoL) of children with down syndrome (DS) and the mediating effect of family adaptation.
This cross-sectional study was conducted between April 2023 and August 2023.
A total of 106 father–mother dyads of children with DS aged 2–12 years in South Korea were included. The parents independently completed questionnaires assessing parenting stress, family adaptation, and their children's QoL. The Actor–Partner Interdependence Mediation Model was used for the dyadic analysis.
The direct effect of parenting stress on children's QoL was not significant; however, the indirect effect of family adaptation was significant. Fathers' parenting stress indirectly influenced their children's QoL through their own and their mothers' family adaptations. Conversely, mothers' parenting stress indirectly influenced their children's QoL through their own family adaptation, although the mediating effect of fathers was not statistically significant.
Higher family adaptation in both fathers and mothers was associated with an improved QoL in children with DS. The pathways through which parents influenced their children's QoL differed but were interdependent. Therefore, dyadic interventions aimed at improving family adaptation in both fathers and mothers may help improve the QoL of children with DS.
This is the first study to examine parental influence on children's QoL based on dyadic interactions among fathers, mothers, and children with DS. This study highlights the importance of assessing and promoting fathers' and mothers' levels of family adaptation to improve the QoL of children with DS. Nurses should consider effective dyadic interventions for families that include both parents to maximise improvements in the QoL of children with DS.
No patient or public contributions.
This study adhered to the STROBE guidelines for cross-sectional studies.
To systematically map the landscape of central venous access device research from 2014 to 2024, identifying critical gaps in evidence that may impact nursing practice and patient outcomes across the full device lifecycle from selection through to removal.
This review was conducted in accordance with the Guidance for producing a Campbell evidence and gap map and reported following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines.
PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature Complete, Scopus, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were systematically searched with additional hand-searching of reference lists from included reviews.
We systematically reviewed literature published between 2014 and 2024, mapping 710 studies on central venous access device interventions and outcomes. Studies were categorised by design, population, setting, device characteristics, intervention types, and outcomes. Evidence was evaluated using the National Health and Medical Research Council levels of evidence framework.
Of 710 included studies, 89 were systematic reviews and 621 primary studies, of which 41.1% (n = 292) were randomised controlled trials. Research was primarily conducted in high-income countries (n = 405, 65.2%) and focused on adults (n = 370, 59.6%) in hospital inpatient settings (n = 588, 94.7%). Catheter insertion and infection prevention dominated the evidence base, while device selection and removal procedures were less studied. Infection outcomes were extensively reported (bloodstream infection: n = 455, 13.6% of 3349 outcomes), while patient-reported outcomes (n = 218, 6.5%) and cost (n = 60, 1.8%) were underrepresented.
This review reveals that central venous access device research is predominantly focused on insertion and infection prevention while other key parts of nursing practice are under-supported.
Future nursing research should address these gaps to improve evidence-based care across diverse populations and healthcare contexts, particularly focusing on understudied device types, settings, and vulnerable populations.
This review was conducted and reported in accordance with the Guidance for producing a Campbell evidence and gap map.
This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct, or reporting.
Evidence-based practice (EBP) plays an indispensable role in ensuring the safety and quality of nursing interventions, especially in labor-intensive and technology-dependent clinical environments such as intensive care units (ICUs). However, implementing EBP continues to be challenging due to perennial structural, organisational, and workforce issues. Concepts of implementation science can provide a framework with which to assess and facilitate the integration of factors that drive EBP implementation within ICUs.
To assess the level of EBP implementation within ICUs and examine the barriers and facilitators that drive EBP implementation using the PARIHS framework.
A concurrent mixed method design was utilised. The study was performed in the ICUs of two tertiary hospitals and involved nurses who completed survey questionnaires and participated in focus group discussions and semi-structured interviews. Ethics approval was obtained from relevant research ethics committees.
EBP implementation was low. EBP skills and training need significantly predicted levels of EBP implementation. Factors comprising context and facilitation affected nurses' experiences of implementing EBP, grouped into three themes of Identity, Power Ownership, and Dynamism. Meta-inferences showed that evidence, context, and facilitation can be characterised as a continuum, providing a three-dimensional perspective of implementing EBP.
The PARIHS framework has provided an alternative perspective with which to approach EBP implementation, foregrounding the role of context and facilitation in promoting the uptake of evidence into clinical practice.
Critical care nurses have contributed to the development of the research design and data collection plan.
To better develop and understand the practice of rooming-in in adult care, this study aims to explore the perceptions of the three most important stakeholders: nurses, patients, and family members.
A cross sectional survey study in a university medical centre in the Netherlands.
A convenience sample was drawn from nurses, adult patients, and family members across ten general wards. Data of patients and family members were collected through online questionnaires, developed and validated prior to the study. Their responses were summarised using descriptive statistics. For the nurses, data were obtained by analysing responses to an open-ended question from an existing questionnaire, using thematic analysis.
The sample consisted of 364 nurses, 26 patients, and 35 family members. Thematic analysis of the nursing data revealed four themes: (1) reducing the workload of nurses, (2) optimising patient recovery, (3) unclear policy and inadequate facilities, and (4) complexities for nurses. Regarding the perceptions of patients and family members, more than 75% perceived that rooming-in enhanced patients' sense of safety. Additionally, 54.1% of family members indicated that rooming-in improved their understanding of medical information. For most patients (57.7%) and family members (62.9%), the rules and conditions for rooming-in were not clear. Moreover, 65.7% of family members reported experiencing physical burden. Both patients and family members rated rooming-in with a median of 8 out of 10.
According to nurses, patients, and family members, rooming-in may be beneficial in reducing nurses' workload, enhancing patient safety, and improving family understanding of medical information.
Given the ambiguity surrounding rooming-in policies in adult care, clear guidelines and their implementation are essential for ensuring their success.
Rooming-in can positively contribute to adult care by facilitating family involvement.
STROBE statement.
No patient or public contribution.
FreshRSS 