Conectar
To identify and synthesise qualitative evidence on nurses' perceptions of reasons for missed nursing care in hospitals.
Systematic review of qualitative evidence.
An extensive search of all relevant databases was conducted. Study selection, quality assessment, data extraction and meta-aggregation were performed independently by two reviewers according to the JBI guidelines for systematic reviews of qualitative evidence. Confidence in the findings was assessed using the ConQual approach.
The electronic databases CINAHL, PubMed, Embase, PsychInfo, and Scopus were searched in January 2024 and repeated in May 2025.
Thirty-one studies from hospital settings worldwide were included following critical appraisal, with overall quality rated moderate to high. The studies contributed 168 findings, which were organised into 10 categories and three synthesised findings: Organisational and system-level factors influencing missed nursing care, Teamwork and cultural factors influencing missed nursing care, and Individual nurse- and patient-related factors influencing missed nursing care.
Reasons for missed nursing care represent an interplay of systemic, organisational, and individual factors within complex resource-constrained contexts.
Healthcare organisations are recommended to implement system-level interventions, rather than relying solely on behaviour-focused solutions. Healthcare leaders should ensure flexible staffing, strong managerial support, and adequate resources to enable fundamental care. Building collaborative, interprofessional cultures that value relational and fundamental care as well as technical tasks is essential, together with education and mentorship that support nurses' decision-making, resilience, and clinical competence.
Hospital leaders, policymakers, and nurse managers can use the recommendations to reduce missed nursing care and promote a safe person-centred practice. Implementing systemic changes will improve nurses' working conditions and capacity to deliver comprehensive care, ultimately enhancing patient satisfaction and outcomes.
The ‘enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research statement’.
No patient or public involvement.
The review is registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews. PROSPERO CRD42023438198 (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/search)
This study aims to explore the views and experiences of people with dementia, informal caregivers and professionals regarding eating and drinking difficulties.
A qualitative systematic review was conducted.
The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis guidelines were used to conduct this systematic review. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for Qualitative Research, and the data were thematically synthesised using Thomas and Harden's three-stage method.
Six electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CINAHL and PsycINFO) were searched from their respective inception dates to August 2025 to identify relevant studies.
Thematic analysis of the 16 included studies identified four key themes: (1) Physiological and psychological changes in people with dementia and caregivers; (2) factors influencing eating and drinking in people with dementia; (3) needs and recommendations for people with dementia, informal caregivers and professionals; (4) selection of eating methods for end-stage people with dementia.
Eating and drinking difficulties affect the well-being of both patients and caregivers. A good dining environment improves mealtime pleasure but demands caregivers' time and energy. All parties emphasised the importance of effective communication. In end-stage dementia, professional assistance is crucial for enteral nutrition decisions.
Collaboration among patients, caregivers and professionals is vital for creating tailored nutritional plans and improving mealtime environments, thereby enhancing nutritional intake. In advanced dementia, providers must provide balanced information on comfort feeding versus enteral nutrition to aid decision-making.
What problems were addressed in this study? This study addressed the lack of a consolidated, tri-perspective understanding of eating and drinking difficulties in dementia care settings. What are the main findings? Four key themes were identified: physiological and psychological changes, influencing factors, stakeholder needs and end-of-life decision-making. Where and on whom will the research have an impact? This will impact care practices for people with dementia and inform the training and support of informal caregivers and healthcare professionals.
To identify and synthesise qualitative and quantitative evidence of nurse managers' qualities, practices and styles related to leading nurses' interprofessional collaboration.
Mixed-methods systematic review.
Two authors independently selected studies based on predefined inclusion criteria, assessed quality and extracted data. A thematic synthesis with a convergent qualitative design was used.
CINAHL, PubMed and Scopus were searched from January 1, 2010, to September 7, 2025. Citations of relevant articles were screened.
A total of 32 articles were included. The analysis revealed two leadership core qualities, five core practices, and three core styles of nurse managers that promote nurses' interprofessional collaboration. Core qualities were proficiency and mindset. Core practices comprised empowering, communicating and informing, commitment to interprofessional collaboration, creating possibilities, and establishing an enhancing atmosphere. Core styles included authentic, transformational, and transactional leadership styles.
The results reflect the situational nature of nursing leadership related to interprofessional collaboration. Successful leadership requires managers to adopt primarily a transformational leadership style, yet more traditional leadership is required occasionally. Results indicate that nursing leadership is foremost a process that evolves within its context.
Greater clarity on how leadership influences nurses' interprofessional collaboration supports leaders, organisations, and educational institutions in developing and sustaining effective leadership.
This review demonstrates that the quality of nursing leadership is a central factor for successful interprofessional collaboration.
The PRISMA guidelines for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis were used.
This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct or reporting.
To explore the impact of systems thinking in nursing leadership on healthcare quality, decision-making and resource management.
A systematic review.
A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus and Web of Science for studies published in English and Italian up to 2024.
Studies were selected based on predefined eligibility criteria, focusing on nursing leadership integrating systems thinking. The Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) checklist was used to assess methodological quality. A narrative synthesis was conducted to identify key themes and patterns.
Fifteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Findings suggest that systems thinking enhances resource management, decision-making and patient safety, while also reducing errors and improving staff collaboration. Adopting a systems approach allows nursing leaders to navigate complex healthcare environments effectively. However, variability in study designs and implementation strategies limits the generalizability of findings.
Integrating systems thinking into nursing leadership promotes a proactive, holistic approach to problem-solving, optimising healthcare outcomes. While evidence supports its benefits, further empirical studies are needed to confirm its effectiveness across diverse healthcare settings.
What problem did the study address? The need for structured systems thinking in nursing leadership. What were the main findings? Improved decision-making, resource optimisation and patient safety through systems-oriented leadership. Where and on whom will the research have an impact? Nurse leaders, healthcare administrators and policymakers in diverse healthcare settings.
Although patients and the public were not directly involved, this study has implications for enhancing patient safety and healthcare efficiency.
To explore the relationship between sleep and cognitive frailty in older adults.
A systematic review and meta-analysis.
The Web of Science, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Embase, PsycINFO and PubMed databases were searched from inception to October 28, 2024.
Two investigators independently conducted literature screening, data extraction and quality assessment. The Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Tool and Newcastle–Ottawa Scale were used to evaluate methodological quality. This review followed PRISMA guidelines.
This review included 13 articles involving 14,223 individuals, and 10 studies included in the meta-analysis. Across 13 studies, the overall prevalence of cognitive frailty was 25%. Sleep problems were categorised into four categories; the results reported that poor sleep quality, long sleep time and insomnia were correlated with the presence of cognitive frailty. However, the relationship between short sleep time and cognitive frailty was not significant.
This review quantitatively suggested that sleep parameters such as long sleep time, insomnia and poor sleep quality were correlated with the presence of cognitive frailty. Future research should adopt longitudinal designs and use validated instruments to measure both quantitative and qualitative aspects of sleep, thereby facilitating a thorough examination of the strength of the relationship between sleep and cognitive frailty, as well as the direction of causality.
The review highlights the need to integrate comprehensive sleep assessments and targeted interventions into nursing care plans for older adults to enhance their sleep health. The findings will provide support for the development of effective interventions to prevent and manage cognitive frailty in the older population.
No patient or public contribution.
To systematically review published studies on fall risk prediction models for inpatients.
A systematic review and meta-analysis of prognostic model studies.
A literature search was carried out in Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, SinoMed, VIP Database, CNKI and Wanfang Database. The search covered studies on risk prediction models for falls in inpatients from inception to March 9, 2024.
The research question was formulated using the PICOTS framework. Data extraction was performed following the Critical Appraisal and Data Extraction for Systematic Reviews of Prediction Modelling Studies (CHARMS). The quality of studies related to risk prediction models was evaluated with the Prediction Model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool (PROBAST). Meta-analysis was conducted using STATA 18.0 software.
A total of 15 studies were included, with 13 eligible for meta-analysis. Only 2 of these 15 studies had external validation. The reported AUC values ranged from 0.681 to 0.900. The overall risk of bias was high, mainly attributed to inappropriate data sources and improper processing in the analysis domain. The pooled AUC from the meta-analysis was 0.799. After reviewing the predictors included in various models, FRIDs, fall history, age, gait, mental status, gender and incontinence were relatively common.
The fall risk prediction model for inpatients performs well overall, but it has a high risk of bias. Future development of risk prediction models should strictly adhere to the PROBAST, combine clinical reality, optimise study design and improve methodological quality.
This study provides medical professionals with a clear overview of constructing fall risk prediction models for inpatients. The fall-related predictors in these models help healthcare providers identify high-risk patients and implement preventive strategies. It also offers valuable insights for the development of future prediction models.
This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct, or reporting.
To describe the factors associated with work engagement in newly graduated nurses.
Systematic review of original quantitative studies according to Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines.
The systematic review utilised PEO inclusion criteria. Original peer-reviewed quantitative studies were identified. Two researchers independently conducted a screening of study eligibility based on title, abstract, and full text. The JBI critical appraisal tool for analytical cross-sectional studies was employed to perform a rigorous methodological quality assessment. The data was extracted, tabulated, and then analysed narratively.
The literature search was conducted in November 2023 by screening four databases: Scopus, CINAHL (Ebsco), ProQuest, and Ovid Medline.
The review included 19 articles, presenting an overview of factors associated with newly graduated nurses' work engagement. Factors were classified into seven categories explaining supportive workplace, transition and orientation to workplace, competence and career development in nursing practice, personal and psychological characteristics, work environment characteristics, stress and challenges in a work environment, and satisfaction with work.
To support newly graduated nurses' work engagement, nurse leaders should provide a supportive working environment and focus on new nurses' effective support systems in the workplace. Their abilities to develop and educate themselves need to be prioritised to enhance their knowledge and skills in nursing. Additionally, organisations should have policies and procedures to ensure quality orientation, and units need to implement transition and mentorship programmes.
This research could be valuable to health care when wanting to develop and improve work engagement, especially among newly graduated nurses. The economic significance of nurses' work engagement is evident, as the cost of nurse turnover is considerable. Reducing nurse turnover and improving retention relies on understanding the factors influencing nurses' decisions to leave the organisation and the profession.
What problem did the study address? The global shortage of nurses, worsened by newly qualified nurses leaving the health sector, necessitates understanding factors influencing their work engagement; The factors associated with newly graduated nurses' work engagement were supportive work environment, transition and orientation to work, success and career development in nursing, personal and psychological characteristics, characteristics of the work environment, stress and challenges in the work environment, and job satisfaction. Where and on whom will the research have an impact? The results can be used by health care organisations to plan the preceptorship/mentoring programmes of new nurses. Identifying and understanding the factors associated with the retention of newly qualified nurses can help to attract and retain nurses and to promote the adaptation and integration of new nurses into healthcare organisations.
The YNEPR author checklist has been completed and implemented during this systematic review process. Also, the Prisma 2020 checklist has been used.
No patient or public contribution: systematic review.
PROSPERO number: CRD42023408705 (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/)
Kangaroo Care is an effective practice recommended by WHO for newborns, especially preterm infants, to reduce mortality and morbidity and improve health outcomes. Understanding parents' experiences with Kangaroo Care is vital as it can significantly influence uptake and sustained practice; however, experiences may vary across healthcare systems.
To explore parents' experiences of Kangaroo Care in neonatal units and to examine differences across international health systems.
A qualitative meta-synthesis.
A systematic search of the literature was carried out over seven databases, including CINAHL, MEDLINE ALL, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Maternity & Infant Care, Scopus and Cochrane Library. Qualitative studies published in English from 2010 to January 2024 were included. Data extraction and quality appraisal, using the CASP Qualitative Checklist, were undertaken. Meta-synthesis of the included qualitative findings was carried out. The findings were reported following the Enhancing Transparency in Reporting the Synthesis of Qualitative Research (ENTREQ) guideline. The protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42023483347).
Twenty-five studies were included and four themes were identified: parental fulfilment from Kangaroo Care, Hardship in Kangaroo Care practice, Roadblocks and difficulties in adopting and Building bridges to encourage and support Kangaroo Care.
This review underscores the multifaceted nature of parental experiences, including positive and challenging aspects, as well as significant barriers and facilitators that influenced Kangaroo Care implementation. By understanding these experiences and factors that hinder and enable, healthcare systems and professionals can better support and empower parents to improve the effectiveness of Kangaroo Care.
Kangaroo Care is lifesaving, particularly in low-income countries, but can be a challenge for parents providing it. By addressing deficiencies in infrastructure and resources, barriers can be minimised, thereby encouraging the practice of Kangaroo Care. This is especially important in lower-middle- and low-income countries where the practice is most effective and the practice is lowest.
This project is a meta-synthesis; therefore, no patient or public contribution was deemed necessary.
To explore the application of Classic Grounded Theory (GT) methodology in nursing research and critically appraise studies employing Classic GT against the validated framework Guideline for Reporting and Evaluating Grounded Theory (GUREGT) research studies.
Systematic review without meta-analysis
The review followed the PRISMA statement and used the Synthesis Without Meta-analysis (SWiM) guideline for data analysis. The quality of included articles was assessed using the CASP qualitative research appraisal tool, and the GUREGT framework was applied to evaluate adherence to Classic GT guiding principles.
Databases were PUBMED, CINAHL, Nursing and Allied Health Database (ProQuest).
Twenty-nine studies from 2010 to 2024 met the inclusion criteria. Findings revealed inconsistencies in the reporting of Classic GT methodology in nursing research, with frequent omissions of key methodological elements. The GUREGT tool, while user-friendly and practical, highlights gaps in areas such as identifying the main concern, philosophical positioning, and engagement with the literature. These omissions can compromise methodological rigour, suggesting that further refinement of the GUREGT tool is necessary.
The GUREGT tool provides a promising framework for improving the reporting and evaluation of Classic GT studies. However, its current version requires enhancement to fully address the unique demands of Classic GT and ensure rigorous application and reporting of the methodology. Development of a dedicated reporting guideline tailored to Classic GT is critical for advancing the quality of nursing research and supporting researchers in generating robust, theory-driven insights.
Few studies critically appraise Classic GT methodology in health research. This review highlights the need for dedicated reporting guidelines to support methodological rigour and transparency in Classic GT studies.
This review adhered to EQUATOR reporting guidelines.
No patient or public contribution.
To explore individual and organisational factors affecting near-miss reporting in healthcare settings.
Systematic review following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines.
Five electronic databases from 2013 to 2024 studies published were searched.
A comprehensive search was conducted across PubMed, Web of Science, MEDLINE, Scopus and OpenAlex, covering English, full-text literature from 2013 to 2024. Inclusion criteria focused on studies investigating factors influencing near-miss reporting in healthcare. The risk of bias was assessed using the Risk of Bias in Non-randomised Studies of Interventions tool. Data were synthesised using the Health Belief Model and the Hospital Patient Safety Culture framework.
A total of 20 studies were included. Key individual barriers to near-miss reporting included a lack of knowledge and negative perceptions. Organisational factors, including hospital safety culture, leadership support, error communication, and non-punitive responses to reporting, significantly impacted reporting behaviours.
Promoting a structured and supportive reporting culture, educational initiatives, and simplified reporting mechanisms can improve near-miss reporting practices.
Improving near-miss reporting practices by addressing identified barriers can lead to safer healthcare environments and better patient outcomes.
This paper addresses a gap in the literature regarding near-miss underreporting. The findings will have an impact on healthcare administrators, healthcare professionals, and ultimately, patients. Implementing strategies such as peer mentoring and constructive feedback, targeted training and simplified reporting systems can encourage consistent near-miss reporting. These efforts will ultimately lead to safer healthcare environments and improved patient outcomes.
The review methodology, including data selection, extraction and synthesis, follows PRISMA standards to ensure clarity, transparency and reproducibility.
This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct, or reporting.
This systematic review has been registered with the OSF and is publicly available at https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/EJGY2
The experiences of people from ethnic minority backgrounds living in care homes—A qualitative systematic review.
Despite the increasing need for older people from ethnic minority backgrounds to be able to access good quality, culturally competent care home provision, globally, there is an absence of literature exploring care home residents' perspectives. This study conducted a systematic review, identifying and synthesising qualitative evidence, which explored the experiences of residents', and their families, from ethnic minority backgrounds, who live in care home settings.
A qualitative systematic review.
Nine electronic databases, MEDLINE, Nursing and Allied Health, CINAHL, ASSIA, AMED, Sociological Abstracts, PsycINFO, Web of Science, SCOPUS, were systematically searched for research published after 2005 until 2025.
This systematic review of qualitative studies was conducted in accordance with The PRISMA 2020 (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) statement. Studies were appraised for quality based upon validated critical appraisal tools from the Joanna Briggs Institute. Qualitative data were extracted and synthesised using reflexive thematic analysis.
Sixteen studies were identified from the international literature that explored care home experiences from the resident's and families' perspectives. Three key themes were extrapolated: Patter, which includes how cross-cultural communication skills and language affect care experiences; Place, which includes the care home environment, the multi-ethnic environment, and quality of care; and Person, which encompasses the individual's culture, values, beliefs, food, and family.
There is limited literature from the UK and low-to-middle income countries exploring care home residents' perspectives on care provision. Key components of culturally competent care include culturally sensitive communication, adaptable environments that support residents' chosen lifestyles, and inclusive, family-centred approaches to living well.
For nurses within the adult social care sector, to recognise the need for further research, education, and policy initiatives aimed at enhancing the care home provision for people from ethnic minority groups.
There was no patient or public contribution.
To systematically review advanced nursing roles in caring for people with cognitive impairment and their relatives in acute care hospitals, focusing on describing roles and intervention components.
Systematic review.
We included qualitative and quantitative studies on nurses in advanced roles caring for people with diagnosed or suspected cognitive impairment and their relatives, assessing outcomes at patient, staff and organisational levels. Nurses' advanced role profiles ranged from nurse-led interventions up to Advanced Practice Nurses. We employed the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool for critical appraisal and conducted a synthesis without meta-analysis using a content analysis approach.
MEDLINE, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, ALOIS, Web of Science and LIVIVO up to May 2024, along with forward and backward citation tracking.
We included 48 studies that described 39 distinct interventions. The majority of these studies employed a quasi-experimental design. Most interventions involved Advanced Practice Nurses (n = 23) and focused on people at risk of or experiencing delirium (n = 22). Nurses in advanced roles predominantly engaged in tasks related to direct clinical practice, as well as coaching and guidance for patients, relatives and colleagues. Their responsibilities also included leadership, collaboration and consultation on a regular basis. Activities related to research and ethical decision-making were infrequently reported.
Many areas of responsibility of nurses in advanced roles align with the needs of hospitalised people with cognitive impairment. Nurses in advanced roles increasingly take on diverse activities across all competence domains of Advanced Practice Nursing, with a focus on coaching and guidance, as well as clinical practice, while leadership, collaboration, research and ethical decision-making become more prominent as their formal training advances.
Our comprehensive description of advanced nursing roles in the care of people with cognitive impairment provides a foundation for developing and refining such roles in hospitals.
We followed the PRISMA guideline and SWiM guideline for reporting.
This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct or reporting.
Prospero number: CRD42021265157
To investigate the effects of organisational interventions on the incidence, healing and management of pressure injuries in adult patients in acute hospital settings.
Systematic review.
The review included adult patients at risk of or with pre-existing pressure injuries in acute hospital settings, excluding mental health units, emergency departments or operating theatres. Interventions employed in the included studies were categorised using the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care taxonomy.
Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, EBSCO CINAHL Complete and Web of Science Core Collection were searched from 01 January 2012 to 31 December 2023.
Of 8861 records identified, 7 prevention studies met the inclusion criteria. Six studies reported reductions in pressure injury incidence. Included studies employed various combinations of 14 organisational strategies to enhance practices. Educational interventions were utilised in six studies, including educational meetings, materials and outreach visits. Other common strategies included audit and feedback, communities of practice and continuous quality improvement. The interventions targeted patients and clinicians, primarily nurses, with some involving multidisciplinary teams. The focus was on enhancing healthcare practices through systematic approaches and stakeholder engagement.
Organisational strategies targeting both patients and clinicians as part of an intervention bundle may enhance the prevention of pressure injuries in acute hospital settings. Further, high-quality effectiveness–implementation hybrid trials are required to evaluate these strategies.
Organisational factors influence clinicians' ability to implement evidence-based practices. The effectiveness of specific organisational strategies in acute settings is uncertain. Multiple organisational strategies targeting patients and clinicians may improve the implementability of a pressure injury prevention intervention.
This study adhered to PRISMA guidelines.
Neither patients nor the public were directly involved in this study.
To critically appraise and synthesise the evidence about the effects and experiences of care models and interventions to improve person-centred care for older people in long-term care facilities.
A mixed methods systematic review, following the Joanna Briggs Institute guidance and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses.
MEDLINE, PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Thaijo were searched to identify relevant primary research published in English and Thai from January 2000 to February 2024.
All relevant primary research with quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods design was included. A convergent synthesis approach was used to synthesise and integrate findings.
4070 records were identified, of which 30 studies were retained: 12 quantitative, nine qualitative, and nine mixed methods studies. The evidence revealed five themes: (1) personalised preference, social engagement, and well-being; (2) autonomy and dignity; (3) a home-like environment; (4) family involvement and satisfaction; and (5) organisational and staff support.
This review indicated that person-centred care models and interventions could improve residents' quality of life, autonomy, and promote individual care provision, create an environment based on individual needs, and involve families in care, although challenges such as staff shortages and lack of managerial support may hinder successful implementation. Future work is required to evaluate and identify effective strategies to strengthen organisational support, including leadership development, staff retention, and resource allocation, and evaluate how organisational culture influences the adoption and success of person-centred care practices.
The review provides valuable insights and a comprehensive understanding of the care models and interventions specifically designed to improve person-centred care and enhance the quality of life for older people in long-term care facilities.
Not applicable.
The protocol was registered with the PROSPERO (CRD42024509504)
In response to global outcries of poor healthcare, organisational interventions have been implemented with the aim of promoting compassionate care. An overall synthesis of qualitative data, including the perspectives of healthcare staff who have attended interventions, can establish ‘what works’ and inform future interventions.
To synthesise existing research exploring how healthcare staff experience organisational interventions for compassionate care.
Qualitative evidence synthesis.
A qualitative evidence synthesis was conducted in August 2023. Five databases were searched: MEDLINE, Academic Search Premier, CINAHL, APA PsycInfo and APA PsycArticles. Articles met the following criteria: (a) reported on the experiences of healthcare staff who had participated in organisational interventions for compassionate care, (b) taken place in a healthcare setting, (c) use of a qualitative or mixed-methods methodology, (d) published in English and (e) published since 2010. A thematic synthesis was conducted using NVivo software to synthesise findings. Data from the complete ‘findings/results’ sections were included in the synthesis. The final search protocol and search strategy were registered on PROSPERO (ID: CRD42023472404) and are reported using the PRISMA guidelines.
Eighteen qualitative or mixed-methods studies were included in the review, encapsulating the experiences of healthcare staff across eight countries. Four themes were identified: (1) holding back, (2) humanising healthcare, (3) values are instilled and (4) sustainability is important.
Organisational interventions for compassionate health care are valued and appreciated by healthcare staff and foster reflection and connection. Interventions facilitate clinical creativity, improve staff well-being and strengthen communication between staff.
The implementation of organisational interventions for compassionate care should be encouraged in healthcare settings. Interventions that consider organisational cultures are driven by organisational values and are embedded with sustainability in mind can improve staff well-being and positively impact the provision of patient care.
PRISMA guidelines were followed in the reporting of this review.
To systematically identify and appraise existing risk prediction models for EN aspiration in adult inpatients.
A systematic search was conducted across PubMed, Web of Science Core Collection, Embase, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang Database, China Biomedical Literature Database (CBM) and VIP Database from inception to 1 March 2025.
Systematic review of observational studies.
Two researchers independently performed literature screening and data extraction using the Checklist for Critical Appraisal and Data Extraction for Systematic Reviews of Prediction Modelling Studies (CHARMS). The Prediction Model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool (PROBAST) was employed to evaluate both the risk of bias and the clinical applicability of the included models.
A total of 17 articles, encompassing 29 prediction models, were included. The incidence of aspiration was 9.45%–57.00%. Meta-analysis of high-frequency predictors identified the following significant predictors of aspiration: history of aspiration, depth of endotracheal intubation, impaired consciousness, sedation use, nutritional risk, mechanical ventilation and gastric residual volume (GRV). The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.771–0.992. Internal validation was performed in 12 studies, while both internal and external validation were conducted in 5 studies. All studies demonstrated a high risk of bias, primarily attributed to retrospective design, geographic bias (all from different parts of China), inadequate data analysis, insufficient validation strategies and lack of transparency in the research process.
Current risk prediction models for enteral nutrition-associated aspiration show moderate to high discriminative accuracy but suffer from critical methodological limitations, including retrospective design, geographic bias (all models derived from Chinese cohorts, limiting global generalisability) and inconsistent outcome definitions.
Recognising the high bias of existing models, prospective multicentre data and standardised diagnostics are needed to develop more accurate and clinically applicable predictive models for enteral nutrition malabsorption.
Not applicable.
PROSPERO: CRD420251016435
This systematic review explored the barriers and facilitators to the implementation of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) among nurses in emergency departments (EDs) and critical care units (CCUs).
Systematic review.
A systematic review was performed using both qualitative and quantitative studies from five databases (CINAHL, Web of Science, Embase, Scopus and PubMed). The literature search was conducted in May 2024. The PRISMA framework was used to guide the review process. Findings were subject to a narrative, thematic analysis and critical appraisal.
Eighteen studies were identified that met the inclusion criteria, yielding three themes related to barriers and facilitators of guideline implementation: individual-level, guideline-level and organisational-level. Key barriers included lack of awareness of guidelines, lack of knowledge and skills, attitudes towards guidelines, resource limitations, lack of perceived support, complexity of guidelines and lack of training. Facilitators to guideline use included colleague support, adequate training, effective leadership and refinement of guidelines to ensure relevance, local adaptation and user-friendly content.
Numerous barriers to nurse implementation of CPGs exist in ED and CCU settings, reflecting a complex interplay of individual, CPG-related and organisational factors. To facilitate CPG implementation, it is important for staff to be educated and trained in their use, supported to implement (including resource allocation) and that CPGs are designed to be easily implemented in practice.
This systematic review highlights risk factors for poor CPG implementation and highlights the importance of addressing awareness, knowledge, resources and support for CPG use through targeted training, leadership and CPG design.
An analysis of barriers and facilitators to CPG implementation among nurses in ED and CCU settings provides an important opportunity to address a gap in the literature, facilitating the development of strategies to promote CPG use and enhance care quality among nurses in these specific contexts.
Medication administration errors are high-risk patient safety issues that could potentially cause harm to patients, thereby delaying recovery and increasing length of hospital stay with additional healthcare costs. Nurses are pivotal to the medication administration process and are considered to be in the position to recognize and prevent these errors. However, the effectiveness of interventions implemented by nurses to reduce medication administration errors in acute hospital settings is less reported.
To identify and quantify the effectiveness of interventions by nurses in reducing medication administration errors in adults' inpatient acute hospital.
A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted up to 03/24. Six databases were searched. Study methodology quality assessment was conducted using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal tools, and data extraction was conducted. Meta-analysis was performed to combine effect sizes from the studies, and synthesis without meta-analysis was adopted for studies that were not included in the meta-analysis to aggregate and re-examine results from studies.
Searches identified 878 articles with 26 studies meeting the inclusion criteria. Five types of interventions were identified: (1) educational program, (2) workflow smart technologies, (3) protocolised improvement strategy, (4) low resource ward-based interventions, and (5) electronic medication management. The overall results from 14 studies included in meta-analysis showed interventions implemented by nurses are effective in reducing medication administration errors (Z = 2.15 (p = 0.03); odds ratio = 95% CI 0.70 [0.51, 0.97], I 2 = 94%). Sub-group analysis showed workflow smart technologies to be the most effective intervention compared to usual care. Findings demonstrate that nurse-led interventions can significantly reduce medication administration errors compared to usual care. The effectiveness of individual interventions varied, suggesting a bundle approach may be more beneficial. This provides valuable insights for clinical practice, emphasizing the importance of tailored, evidence-based approaches to improving medication safety.
PRISMA guided the review and JBI critical appraisal tools were used for quality appraisal of included studies.
To describe the implementation determinants for care coordination interventions in a hospital context.
Systematic review.
This review was guided by the Consolidated Framework of Implementation Research (CFIR), assessed for quality using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool and reported with the PRISMA guidelines.
CINHAL Complete, EMBASE, MEDLINE Complete, PsychINFO (between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2022, and updated May 09, 2024) and a manual reference list search of all included studies.
The search returned 5614 articles after duplicates were removed. After title and abstract screening, 264 articles underwent full-text review. Sixteen studies (15 care coordination models) met the inclusion criteria. The CFIR inner setting domain and the implementation process domain were the most prominent domains and ‘Partnerships & Connections’, ‘Work Infrastructure’, ‘Capability’ and ‘Reflecting and Evaluating’ subdomains emerged as important determinants across the included studies.
Inconsistent findings relating to care coordination outcomes are likely to be substantially influenced by the complexity and heterogeneity of the interventions and variations in implementation and contextual factors. Intra- and inter-organisational relationships were important to connect previously disconnected parts of the health system and were facilitated by experienced care coordinators. Continual improvement was also important to increase fit with contextual factors. More high-quality studies are needed to identify commonalities and provide generalisable principles and characteristics associated with high-performance implementation.
Review findings will provide practitioners, policymakers, and researchers with a comprehensive synthesis of evidence underpinning implementation of effective community care coordination from hospital settings.
These review findings will inform the effective implementation of care coordination interventions in a hospital context for patients with complex multimorbidity.
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis.
PROSPERO Registration: CRD42022376642.
No patient or public Contribution.
To identify the pain assessment scales with the best psychometric properties to be used by nurses in an inpatient setting.
Umbrella review.
A comprehensive search of four databases was conducted for systematic reviews published from July 2013 to November 2024, focusing on psychometric properties of pain scales used in inpatient settings. Inclusion criteria required scales to assess subjective or behavioural pain and be nurse-administered, while reviews without detailed psychometric data were excluded. Screening, quality appraisal (JBI checklist), and data extraction were performed independently by two researchers. Data synthesis combined qualitative and quantitative approaches, with psychometric properties evaluated using the COSMIN checklist. The study was reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Overviews of Reviews (PRIOR) statement.
Seventeen articles met the inclusion criteria, identifying 41 scales used across various patient populations, including critical care, paediatric, postoperative, cancer, cerebral palsy, disorders of consciousness, low back and neck pain, stroke and verbal communication disorders. The Paediatric Pain Profile, the Breakthrough Pain Assessment Tool and the Questionnaire on Pain caused by Spasticity demonstrated adequate psychometric properties, although the positive findings for the latter two should be confirmed by at least one additional study. Most of the scales (n = 36) require further studies to validate their use in clinical practice. For two scales, their clinical use remains questionable.
The Paediatric Pain Profile, the Breakthrough Pain Assessment Tool, and the Questionnaire on Pain caused by Spasticity can be recommended for use. Unidimensional scales should complement, rather than replace, multidimensional scales to ensure a comprehensive pain assessment. Standardising documentation with validated scales enhances clinical decision-making, care quality, research usability, and reduces documentation burden.
FreshRSS 