Conectar
Medication administration errors are high-risk patient safety issues that could potentially cause harm to patients, thereby delaying recovery and increasing length of hospital stay with additional healthcare costs. Nurses are pivotal to the medication administration process and are considered to be in the position to recognize and prevent these errors. However, the effectiveness of interventions implemented by nurses to reduce medication administration errors in acute hospital settings is less reported.
To identify and quantify the effectiveness of interventions by nurses in reducing medication administration errors in adults' inpatient acute hospital.
A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted up to 03/24. Six databases were searched. Study methodology quality assessment was conducted using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal tools, and data extraction was conducted. Meta-analysis was performed to combine effect sizes from the studies, and synthesis without meta-analysis was adopted for studies that were not included in the meta-analysis to aggregate and re-examine results from studies.
Searches identified 878 articles with 26 studies meeting the inclusion criteria. Five types of interventions were identified: (1) educational program, (2) workflow smart technologies, (3) protocolised improvement strategy, (4) low resource ward-based interventions, and (5) electronic medication management. The overall results from 14 studies included in meta-analysis showed interventions implemented by nurses are effective in reducing medication administration errors (Z = 2.15 (p = 0.03); odds ratio = 95% CI 0.70 [0.51, 0.97], I 2 = 94%). Sub-group analysis showed workflow smart technologies to be the most effective intervention compared to usual care. Findings demonstrate that nurse-led interventions can significantly reduce medication administration errors compared to usual care. The effectiveness of individual interventions varied, suggesting a bundle approach may be more beneficial. This provides valuable insights for clinical practice, emphasizing the importance of tailored, evidence-based approaches to improving medication safety.
PRISMA guided the review and JBI critical appraisal tools were used for quality appraisal of included studies.
More than 12% of women worldwide are affected by polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), whose symptoms are similar to those of puberty, often leading to delayed diagnosis and missing the opportunity for early intervention. This not only puts PCOS women under physical and mental stress but also reduces their trust in doctors and makes them dissatisfied with the healthcare they receive, which in turn affects their quality of life. Therefore, to improve the doctor-patient relationship and promote health, it is essential to investigate and understand the healthcare experiences that women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) receive.
To explore the experiences of women with PCOS when they receive healthcare.
Qualitative systematic review.
Data were collected and screened using the systematic review management system Covidence, based on the established inclusion criteria. The Critical Appraisal Skills Programme Checklist was used for critical appraisal, and thematic analysis was used for data analysis.
The databases searched included CINAHL, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and Scopus. The search was limited to studies published in English between 2002 and May 2024.
Seven studies were selected for final inclusion. Three themes were identified: (1) responsive care from healthcare practitioners, (2) managing polycystic ovarian syndrome, and (3) polycystic ovary syndrome and its impact on self-image.
The development of a multidisciplinary PCOS clinic, the establishment of online support groups, and the creation of comprehensive patient-centered treatment plans are vital to enhancing the health outcomes of women with PCOS.
Multidisciplinary PCOS clinics, online support groups, and comprehensive patient-centered treatment plans can improve health outcomes for women with PCOS.
The EQUATOR guidelines for PRISMA have been utilised.
No patient or public contribution.
To systematically identify and appraise existing risk prediction models for EN aspiration in adult inpatients.
A systematic search was conducted across PubMed, Web of Science Core Collection, Embase, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang Database, China Biomedical Literature Database (CBM) and VIP Database from inception to 1 March 2025.
Systematic review of observational studies.
Two researchers independently performed literature screening and data extraction using the Checklist for Critical Appraisal and Data Extraction for Systematic Reviews of Prediction Modelling Studies (CHARMS). The Prediction Model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool (PROBAST) was employed to evaluate both the risk of bias and the clinical applicability of the included models.
A total of 17 articles, encompassing 29 prediction models, were included. The incidence of aspiration was 9.45%–57.00%. Meta-analysis of high-frequency predictors identified the following significant predictors of aspiration: history of aspiration, depth of endotracheal intubation, impaired consciousness, sedation use, nutritional risk, mechanical ventilation and gastric residual volume (GRV). The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.771–0.992. Internal validation was performed in 12 studies, while both internal and external validation were conducted in 5 studies. All studies demonstrated a high risk of bias, primarily attributed to retrospective design, geographic bias (all from different parts of China), inadequate data analysis, insufficient validation strategies and lack of transparency in the research process.
Current risk prediction models for enteral nutrition-associated aspiration show moderate to high discriminative accuracy but suffer from critical methodological limitations, including retrospective design, geographic bias (all models derived from Chinese cohorts, limiting global generalisability) and inconsistent outcome definitions.
Recognising the high bias of existing models, prospective multicentre data and standardised diagnostics are needed to develop more accurate and clinically applicable predictive models for enteral nutrition malabsorption.
Not applicable.
PROSPERO: CRD420251016435
To synthesise evidence on nurses' roles in long-term care settings and map their interactions.
Systematic review with network analysis.
Thematic synthesis was used to identify nurses' roles, and network analysis mapped their interactions across domains.
Six databases—Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Research Information Sharing Service and Database of Periodical Information Academic—were searched for peer-reviewed articles from 2014 to 2024. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool assessed study quality.
Fifteen studies were included. Nurses' roles spanned six domains: collaboration, education, leadership, resident-centred care, quality improvement and resource management. Network analysis revealed collaboration and leadership as the most central, each with a degree centrality of five, acting as bridges across domains. Three thematic clusters emerged: collaboration and resource management focused on operational teamwork; leadership and quality improvement centred on systemic care enhancements; and education and resident-centered care emphasised training and resident-focused care. A technological competence gap was identified, alongside barriers like staffing shortages and role ambiguity.
Nurses' interconnected roles are critical for resident-centered care; however, they require systemic support to address barriers and technological gaps.
Enhanced interprofessional training, leadership development and digital skill integration can improve care quality and nurse well-being in long-term care settings.
This study addressed the complexity of nurses' roles in long-term care and their structural interactions, finding collaboration and leadership as pivotal with three role clusters and a technological gap, impacting long-term care nurses, educators and policymakers to inform workforce strategies.
This study adhered to the PRISMA 2020 guidelines and was preregistered in PROSPERO (CRD42024588422).
This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct or reporting.
PROSPERO: CRD42024588422
To describe the implementation determinants for care coordination interventions in a hospital context.
Systematic review.
This review was guided by the Consolidated Framework of Implementation Research (CFIR), assessed for quality using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool and reported with the PRISMA guidelines.
CINHAL Complete, EMBASE, MEDLINE Complete, PsychINFO (between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2022, and updated May 09, 2024) and a manual reference list search of all included studies.
The search returned 5614 articles after duplicates were removed. After title and abstract screening, 264 articles underwent full-text review. Sixteen studies (15 care coordination models) met the inclusion criteria. The CFIR inner setting domain and the implementation process domain were the most prominent domains and ‘Partnerships & Connections’, ‘Work Infrastructure’, ‘Capability’ and ‘Reflecting and Evaluating’ subdomains emerged as important determinants across the included studies.
Inconsistent findings relating to care coordination outcomes are likely to be substantially influenced by the complexity and heterogeneity of the interventions and variations in implementation and contextual factors. Intra- and inter-organisational relationships were important to connect previously disconnected parts of the health system and were facilitated by experienced care coordinators. Continual improvement was also important to increase fit with contextual factors. More high-quality studies are needed to identify commonalities and provide generalisable principles and characteristics associated with high-performance implementation.
Review findings will provide practitioners, policymakers, and researchers with a comprehensive synthesis of evidence underpinning implementation of effective community care coordination from hospital settings.
These review findings will inform the effective implementation of care coordination interventions in a hospital context for patients with complex multimorbidity.
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis.
PROSPERO Registration: CRD42022376642.
No patient or public Contribution.
The aim of this study was to understand the needs of children and young people of a parent with young-onset dementia, to inform the development of a nursing model.
Children and young people of a parent diagnosed with young onset dementia have a range of needs that are subject to change and aligned to their stage of development and growth.
Systematic review.
Searches were conducted in PsycInfo (1806–Jan 2025), Medline (1996–Jan 2025) and CINAHL (1961–Jan 2025); search terms were developed in consultation with an academic librarian.
The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses was used to assess the trustworthiness and applicability of the findings and the Mixed Methods Assessment Tool to assess quality. The review protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42024534104). Needs identified from the literature were matched with the activities and interventions of a specialist nursing model.
Searches yielded 223 records of which 17 met the inclusion/exclusion criteria, the majority of which used qualitative methods (N = 16). A thematic synthesis approach was used to analyse data to reveal four emergent themes: (1) finding a way, (2) social connection and peer support, (3) preserving childhood and adolescence and (4) practical support, including the needs relating to education. Identified needs: knowledge and information, emotional support, consistency in education and development, maintaining social connections, physical and psychological well-being, and grief and loss were mapped against a specialist nurse role.
Children and young people with a parent diagnosed with young-onset dementia face unique challenges compared to older carers. Despite growing awareness of their needs, this population is often overlooked in national dementia strategies. Developing a specialist nurse role is a positive step, but broader systemic support is essential to safeguard their well-being and future opportunities.
This study adheres to the PRISMA reporting guidelines.
A bespoke Research Advisory Group, consisting of people with young onset dementia, young family carers, clinicians and academics, guided the review.
To synthesise evidence on the impact of pre- and post-loss family support interventions on bereavement outcomes and families' perceptions of their usefulness and benefits in specialist palliative care.
A rapid mixed-methods systematic review drawing on JBI and Cochrane guidance. Study quality was appraised using the Mixed-Methods Appraisal Tool. Qualitative and quantitative data were analysed using a meta-aggregation and narrative analysis approach combined with narrative synthesis.
We searched Medline, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Embase and Cochrane Library and included articles published between 2004 and 2024 that evaluated pre- and post-loss family support in specialist adult palliative care and assessed bereavement outcomes.
The search yielded 3682 records. We included thirty-nine mostly moderate to high-quality studies (57% quantitative). Results suggest that pre-loss support, like family-focused interventions and communication during dying, may mitigate post-loss anxiety, depression and grief. Individual and group post-loss support interventions may reduce anxiety, distress and grief while improving well-being. Families desire individualised and comprehensive pre- and post-loss support, with few not needing or accepting it. Stigma associated with bereavement, support and barriers can hinder access.
Included studies demonstrated mixed effects of pre- and post-loss family support interventions, suggesting they are beneficial when accessible and tailored to family needs. High-quality intervention research assessing a broader range of family bereavement outcomes is needed.
Palliative care nurses and other health professionals should tailor their care to family needs, start family support before patient death and ensure equitable access to bereavement services. Our results may guide palliative care professionals in designing effective, personalised and accessible services and policymakers in allocating resources for bereavement care. Findings highlight research needs, including investigating barriers to care and accessibility of services. High-quality research is needed to understand who benefits the most from health-promoting bereavement support and why.
We adhered to the PRISMA guideline.
No Patient and Public Contribution.
Open Science Framework https://osf.io/36jeu
Postpartum psychosis is a psychiatric emergency that occurs following childbirth. Women are often cared for in general psychiatric units or in psychiatric Mother and Baby units. Postpartum psychosis is associated with a significant risk of relapse. There is a need to explore how women perceive care to understand what works well or needs further improvement.
This review aimed to explore women's experiences of care and support for postpartum psychosis.
A systematic review using meta-ethnographic methods was conducted.
Comprehensive searches were conducted between 4 March 2024 and 4 March 2025 on five databases (CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE, PsycINFO and Web of Science). Backward and forward chain searching was also undertaken.
Critical appraisal was conducted following screening. Reciprocal and refutational translation were used to form the synthesis, and a line of argument was developed. The eMERGe reporting guidelines were used.
Fifteen studies were included within this synthesis. All the studies were conducted in high income countries and included 235 women. Three main themes were developed. ‘Navigating the unknown’ explored women's perceptions of postpartum psychosis as a less well-known condition, and their informational needs. ‘The double-edged sword of care’ found that there were helpful elements of formal mental health care, but that accessing care was sometimes traumatic, stigmatising and conflicting to women's identities. ‘Seeking consolation and recovery’ explored women's need for psychological support and experiences of peer support.
The findings of this review highlighted women's needs in respect to informational support, medication support, psychological support and in-patient care settings. Mother and baby units were strongly preferred by women.
The findings highlighted a need for specialised care for postpartum psychosis.
There were no patient or public contributions.
Prospero (CRD42024515712)
This systematic review explored the barriers and facilitators to the implementation of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) among nurses in emergency departments (EDs) and critical care units (CCUs).
Systematic review.
A systematic review was performed using both qualitative and quantitative studies from five databases (CINAHL, Web of Science, Embase, Scopus and PubMed). The literature search was conducted in May 2024. The PRISMA framework was used to guide the review process. Findings were subject to a narrative, thematic analysis and critical appraisal.
Eighteen studies were identified that met the inclusion criteria, yielding three themes related to barriers and facilitators of guideline implementation: individual-level, guideline-level and organisational-level. Key barriers included lack of awareness of guidelines, lack of knowledge and skills, attitudes towards guidelines, resource limitations, lack of perceived support, complexity of guidelines and lack of training. Facilitators to guideline use included colleague support, adequate training, effective leadership and refinement of guidelines to ensure relevance, local adaptation and user-friendly content.
Numerous barriers to nurse implementation of CPGs exist in ED and CCU settings, reflecting a complex interplay of individual, CPG-related and organisational factors. To facilitate CPG implementation, it is important for staff to be educated and trained in their use, supported to implement (including resource allocation) and that CPGs are designed to be easily implemented in practice.
This systematic review highlights risk factors for poor CPG implementation and highlights the importance of addressing awareness, knowledge, resources and support for CPG use through targeted training, leadership and CPG design.
An analysis of barriers and facilitators to CPG implementation among nurses in ED and CCU settings provides an important opportunity to address a gap in the literature, facilitating the development of strategies to promote CPG use and enhance care quality among nurses in these specific contexts.
To systematically review published studies on the post stroke delirium risk prediction models; and to provide the evidence for developing and updating the clinically available prediction models.
Systematic review.
Systematically searched studies on 10 databases, which were conducted from inception to 9 January 2025. The studies of post-stroke delirium risk prediction models were included.
Extracted the data from the selected studies. The Prediction Model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool checklist was used to evaluate the risk of bias of the models. The meta-analysis of model performance and common predictors was performed by Revman 5.4 and Medcalc.
A total of 12 studies were included, and 21 risk prediction models for post-stroke delirium were constructed. The combined effect size of area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.84. All studies were found to have a high risk of bias and good applicability. Meta-analysis showed: National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, age, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, neglect, visual impairment and atrial fibrillation were independent predictors of post-stroke delirium.
The included studies all found to have a high risk of bias; future studies should focus on adopting more scientifically rigorous study designs and following the standardised reporting guidelines to enhance extrapolation and facilitate its clinical application.
This review may promote clinical healthcare workers to develop and update clinically available prediction models, thereby establishing risk prediction models with strong clinical utility.
This study presents the first systematic evaluation of delirium risk prediction models in stroke patients, thereby facilitating the choice, use and develop of the clinical usable post stroke delirium risk prediction models.
This review adhered to the PRISMA guidelines.
No patient or public contribution.
RD42024620360 (PROSPERO According to JAN Guidelines).
Ethnic minoritized women face cultural and systemic barriers in accessing antepartum and intrapartum care. Healthcare providers play a pivotal role in addressing these challenges, but their perspectives and experiences in delivering culturally competent care remain underexplored.
To synthesise healthcare providers' experiences and perspectives on providing culturally competent antepartum and intrapartum care for ethnic minoritised women.
A qualitative meta-synthesis study design was employed. Six electronic databases were searched from their inception date till January 2025. The included studies were assessed using the method of the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme tool, and findings were meta-synthesised using Sandelowski and Barroso's six-step approach. This review was registered via the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews.
Overall, 38 studies were included, and three themes emerged. The first theme revealed how providers' biases and professional training distorted their ability to understand and respect cultural practices. The second theme underscored the impact of systemic barriers such as time constraints, resource scarcity and lack of representation among providers. The final theme highlighted healthcare providers' aspirations for improved communication, targeted training and guidance on building trust to enhance care delivery.
Healthcare providers encounter notable challenges in delivering culturally competent antepartum and intrapartum care, but remain hopeful about bridging gaps in communication and understanding. Practical recommendations include implementing mandatory cultural competency training at all levels of healthcare professional education, increasing resources for interpreters and cultural liaisons and fostering diversity within the healthcare workforce. Future research should explore patient-centred interventions and systemic reforms to improve care for ethnic minoritised women. These findings highlight the need for policies and practices that empower providers to deliver equitable, culturally respectful antepartum and intrapartum care.
No patient or public contribution.
To identify the pain assessment scales with the best psychometric properties to be used by nurses in an inpatient setting.
Umbrella review.
A comprehensive search of four databases was conducted for systematic reviews published from July 2013 to November 2024, focusing on psychometric properties of pain scales used in inpatient settings. Inclusion criteria required scales to assess subjective or behavioural pain and be nurse-administered, while reviews without detailed psychometric data were excluded. Screening, quality appraisal (JBI checklist), and data extraction were performed independently by two researchers. Data synthesis combined qualitative and quantitative approaches, with psychometric properties evaluated using the COSMIN checklist. The study was reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Overviews of Reviews (PRIOR) statement.
Seventeen articles met the inclusion criteria, identifying 41 scales used across various patient populations, including critical care, paediatric, postoperative, cancer, cerebral palsy, disorders of consciousness, low back and neck pain, stroke and verbal communication disorders. The Paediatric Pain Profile, the Breakthrough Pain Assessment Tool and the Questionnaire on Pain caused by Spasticity demonstrated adequate psychometric properties, although the positive findings for the latter two should be confirmed by at least one additional study. Most of the scales (n = 36) require further studies to validate their use in clinical practice. For two scales, their clinical use remains questionable.
The Paediatric Pain Profile, the Breakthrough Pain Assessment Tool, and the Questionnaire on Pain caused by Spasticity can be recommended for use. Unidimensional scales should complement, rather than replace, multidimensional scales to ensure a comprehensive pain assessment. Standardising documentation with validated scales enhances clinical decision-making, care quality, research usability, and reduces documentation burden.
In response to global outcries of poor healthcare, organisational interventions have been implemented with the aim of promoting compassionate care. An overall synthesis of qualitative data, including the perspectives of healthcare staff who have attended interventions, can establish ‘what works’ and inform future interventions.
To synthesise existing research exploring how healthcare staff experience organisational interventions for compassionate care.
Qualitative evidence synthesis.
A qualitative evidence synthesis was conducted in August 2023. Five databases were searched: MEDLINE, Academic Search Premier, CINAHL, APA PsycInfo and APA PsycArticles. Articles met the following criteria: (a) reported on the experiences of healthcare staff who had participated in organisational interventions for compassionate care, (b) taken place in a healthcare setting, (c) use of a qualitative or mixed-methods methodology, (d) published in English and (e) published since 2010. A thematic synthesis was conducted using NVivo software to synthesise findings. Data from the complete ‘findings/results’ sections were included in the synthesis. The final search protocol and search strategy were registered on PROSPERO (ID: CRD42023472404) and are reported using the PRISMA guidelines.
Eighteen qualitative or mixed-methods studies were included in the review, encapsulating the experiences of healthcare staff across eight countries. Four themes were identified: (1) holding back, (2) humanising healthcare, (3) values are instilled and (4) sustainability is important.
Organisational interventions for compassionate health care are valued and appreciated by healthcare staff and foster reflection and connection. Interventions facilitate clinical creativity, improve staff well-being and strengthen communication between staff.
The implementation of organisational interventions for compassionate care should be encouraged in healthcare settings. Interventions that consider organisational cultures are driven by organisational values and are embedded with sustainability in mind can improve staff well-being and positively impact the provision of patient care.
PRISMA guidelines were followed in the reporting of this review.
To extract and interpret quantitative data exploring the effectiveness of family health conversations (FHCs) on family functioning, perceived support, health-related quality of life, caregiver burden and family health in families living with critical or chronic health conditions.
Addressing the health of families affected by critical or chronic illnesses requires focused attention. The effective integration of FHCs is hampered by a scarcity of rigorous quantitative studies that provide solid evidence on best practices and outcomes.
A systematic review following the Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines.
The review is reported according to the PRISMA 2020 checklist. Appropriate studies were searched in PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Scopus and Cochrane Databases. Results of the search were imported into the Covidence web-based program. Included were studies with a quantitative research design, delivered to families with critical or chronic health conditions, describing FHCs based on the Calgary Family Assessment Model and/or the Calgary Family Intervention Model, and/or the Illness Beliefs Model, using reliable and validated instruments, published between 2008 and 2023, and written in English.
In total, 24 papers met the inclusion criteria. Sixteen papers used a quasi-experimental design, eight of which included a control group. Two papers used a mixed methods design, and six papers were randomised controlled trials (RCTs). A statistically significant effect of FHCs on family functioning was reported in two RCTs and three quasi-experimental papers. We also found that a statistically significant effect of FHCs was reported on perceived support in 9 of 15 papers, quality of life in 4 of 11 papers and caregiver burden in 1 of 3 papers.
The interventions reviewed revealed variability and partial results concerning the effectiveness of FHCs on family functioning. More rigorous research about short-term, intermediate- and long-term effectiveness is needed before conclusions can be drawn.
The study is reported according to the PRISMA 2020 (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) (File S1).
No patient or public contribution. Data were gathered from previously published studies.
To investigate the effects of active involvement of family caregivers in adult in-hospital care on patients' readmissions, complications, mortality, length of hospital stay, quality of life, psychological distress and activities of daily living, as well as on the satisfaction of patients, HCPs and family caregivers.
Systematic review.
Ovid Medline, Ovid Embase, EBSCO CINAHL, Cochrane Library (from inception to February 2024).
The PRISMA 2020 statement was followed. Prospective controlled studies focusing on active involvement of family caregivers in adult in-hospital care were included. Two independent teams of authors conducted study selection, quality assessment and data extraction.
Thirteen studies were included, comprising 11 randomised controlled trials. The clinical and methodological heterogeneity precluded a meta-analysis. Six of these studies were performed in stroke patients. Some studies reported statistically significant benefits of active family involvement on readmission rates, hospital LOS, ADL, psychological distress for patients and family members, QoL and satisfaction of family caregivers. However, others did not observe differences in these outcomes. For complication rates, mortality and satisfaction of patients and HCPs, no studies demonstrated significant differences between groups.
Further research is needed to provide a conclusive answer as to whether active family caregiver involvement improves outcomes of adult hospitalised patients.
Despite the inconclusive findings of this review, advocating for active involvement of family caregivers in adult in-hospital care fits the perspective of patient- and family-centred care.
As the care of hospitalised adults is shifting to a more family-centric approach, investigating the effects of an active role of family caregivers in adult in-hospital care is necessary. However, the small number of studies available and heterogeneity between studies included in this review hamper firm conclusions. Further evaluations through well-designed studies are required.
The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate the measurement properties of pressure injury risk assessment tools for cancer patients using the Consensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) methodology, and to serve as a reference for clinical nurses in their hospital duties when choosing high-quality assessment tools.
A systematic review based on COSMIN methodology.
The English literature in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, CINAHL and the search period ranged from the inception of the database to September 30, 2024.
Two reviewers independently screened the studies, extracted the data, and evaluated the methodological quality and measurement properties of the included studies.
Seven studies met the inclusion criteria. Two tools—the PUSO (Pressure Ulcer Scale in Oncology) and the Cuire scale—demonstrated sufficient evidence of content validity and structural validity, meeting the COSMIN quality standards. None of the studies reported the cross-cultural validity, stability, and measurement error of the assessment tool.
Following the COSMIN assessment, the PUSO and the Cuire were developed using rigorous procedures, ensuring sufficient overall quality for content validity, structural validity, and other measurement properties. We recommend their use across various environments, based on the quantity and content of specific items. The PUSO was recommended for clinical screening, whereas the Cuire scale was deemed more suitable for use in outpatient, community, and scientific research settings. However, these measurement properties are not without flaws, and their clinical application requires further validation.
To identify adverse outcomes and factors associated with diabetes mellitus among children and youths in East Africa.
This review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.
No date restrictions were applied to searches of the Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library databases and Google Scholar. The review identified and included literature published between 2007 and 2024.
Independent reviewers conducted study selection, data extraction, and quality assessment. Data were organised in Microsoft Excel, detailing study characteristics, demographics, exposures, and outcomes. Narrative synthesis summarised the data, while meta-analysis yielded pooled proportions.
From 3797 publications, 30 studies involving 6109 children and youths with type 1 diabetes were included. Findings revealed that between 39.3% and 99% did not achieve target glycaemic levels. Diabetic ketoacidosis at diagnosis ranged from 35.8% to 78.7%. Pooled estimates indicated mortality in 6.47%, nephropathy in 15.66%, and retinopathy in 27.49% of the cases. Other complications included decreased health-related quality of life, lipodystrophy, psychiatric disorders, and stunting.
This review highlights the need for context-specific, personalised diabetes care for children and youths in East Africa. It underscores the need for healthcare professionals, particularly nurse diabetes educators, to provide personalised, holistic care and education. Policies that strengthen health systems, expand health insurance, and improve access to care are critical priorities to improve outcomes for these populations.
This study provides new information on diabetes-related complications and management challenges among children and youths in East Africa. Findings flag the urgent need for integrated care, standardised diagnostic criteria, and improved access to resources, with implications for healthcare providers, policymakers, and researchers to enhance health outcomes and quality of life.
This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct, or reporting.
This study aimed to systematically review Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs) for nutritional management of dementia and use evidence mapping to highlight research trends and identify gaps to inform future research.
A systematic review of guidelines using the PRISMA statement.
Systematically collect literature on dementia management CPGs from PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and guideline databases. Extract basic information, recommendations, methodological quality and reporting quality of the CPGs. Four researchers independently evaluated eligible CPGs using the AGREE II instrument and the RIGHT checklist. All recommendations from the CPGs were summarised and analysed, and evidence mapping bubble charts were created in Excel.
After excluding 5541 records, 10 CPGs were eventually proved eligible, 5 of which were of high quality and 5 of high quality. With 10 CPGs that combined 18 recommendations. The nutrition screening and assessment were summarised on the basis of the dementia recommendations for 4 major items, 7 items on nutritional interventions, 5 items on caring and 2 on education.
This review provides an evidence map and offers new perspectives on CPGs for nutritional management in dementia. However, there are improvements to the included CPGs, but most CPGs have a number of key recommendations that can help guide clinical practice.
The currently available guidelines on dementia nutritional management have room for methodological improvement.
To critically assess the impact of theory-guided positive psychological interventions on the quality of life of breast cancer patients and survivors.
Systematic review and meta-analysis.
A comprehensive literature search was conducted across seven electronic databases from inception to August 2024. Randomised controlled trials that examined the effects of theory-guided positive psychological interventions on adult breast cancer patients or survivors and reported quality of life outcomes were included. Screening, data extraction and critical appraisal were independently performed by the reviewers using the revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool (RoB2). A meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan Web. The study was reported following the PRISMA 2020 Statement.
Five randomised controlled trials were included. Only two of these studies showed a low risk of bias across all quality measures. The meta-analysis demonstrated a significant improvement in quality of life following theory-guided positive psychological interventions, with low heterogeneity. Subgroup analyses revealed that interventions lasting either less than or longer than 3 weeks, and both group-based and individual-based formats, had positive effects on quality of life. Additional psychological benefits were observed including reductions in depressive symptoms, anxiety, perceived stress and improvements in post-traumatic growth, resilience, hope and perceived benefits. One study also reported improvements in sleep quality.
The findings demonstrate that theory-guided positive psychological interventions can potentially significantly improve quality of life in breast cancer patients. However, the limited number of studies underscores the need for further high-quality research to validate these findings and identify the most effective intervention characteristics.
Our systematic review highlights that theory-guided positive psychological interventions show promise as an effective strategy for improving the quality of life in breast cancer patients. These interventions can enhance psychosocial support strategies, paving the way for better-informed approaches that lead to improved patient outcomes.
No patient or public contribution.
The systematic review and meta-analysis had been registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) under the registration ID number: CRD42024581382
To explore the impact of systems thinking in nursing leadership on healthcare quality, decision-making and resource management.
A systematic review.
A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus and Web of Science for studies published in English and Italian up to 2024.
Studies were selected based on predefined eligibility criteria, focusing on nursing leadership integrating systems thinking. The Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) checklist was used to assess methodological quality. A narrative synthesis was conducted to identify key themes and patterns.
Fifteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Findings suggest that systems thinking enhances resource management, decision-making and patient safety, while also reducing errors and improving staff collaboration. Adopting a systems approach allows nursing leaders to navigate complex healthcare environments effectively. However, variability in study designs and implementation strategies limits the generalizability of findings.
Integrating systems thinking into nursing leadership promotes a proactive, holistic approach to problem-solving, optimising healthcare outcomes. While evidence supports its benefits, further empirical studies are needed to confirm its effectiveness across diverse healthcare settings.
What problem did the study address? The need for structured systems thinking in nursing leadership. What were the main findings? Improved decision-making, resource optimisation and patient safety through systems-oriented leadership. Where and on whom will the research have an impact? Nurse leaders, healthcare administrators and policymakers in diverse healthcare settings.
Although patients and the public were not directly involved, this study has implications for enhancing patient safety and healthcare efficiency.
FreshRSS 