Conectar
Psychiatric settings are high-risk environments for violence. Coercive measures (CMs) and security technologies (STs) can be used to ensure safety. However, limited evidence exists on how Italian mental health nurses (MHNs) perceive the appropriateness of such practices and the influencing factors. This study aimed to fill this gap.
Cross-sectional study.
An online survey collected sociodemographic data and validated measures of depression, anxiety, stress, stigma toward mental illness, and humanization of care. The perceived appropriateness of various CMs and STs was rated on a 5-point Likert scale using a validated item set. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, bivariate tests, and multilevel mixed-effects linear regression.
A total of 707 MHNs participated in the study. CMs were considered moderately appropriate (mean = 3.56 ± 0.92), with pharmacological restraint and locked-door policies rated as more appropriate than physical restraint. STs were evaluated better (mean = 3.74 ± 0.95), with alarms and closed-circuit television judged more appropriate than body-worn cameras and metal detectors. CMs were considered less appropriate by non-believers (p = 0.009), head nurses (p < 0.001), and those in non-acute settings (p = 0.004), and more appropriate by those in Central Italy (p = 0.036), on daytime shifts (p = 0.042), and with higher stigma (p = 0.012). STs were considered less appropriate by males (p = 0.004), head nurses (p = 0.040), and more experienced MHNs (p < 0.001), and more appropriate by those in Southern Italy (p < 0.001) and in non-acute settings (p < 0.001).
MHNs consider CMs and STs moderately appropriate. Perceptions are influenced by both individual and contextual factors. Targeted training, anti-stigma education, and inclusive policies are needed to ensure ethical and evidence-based safety practices in psychiatric care.
Targeted education and training in mental health nursing, both continuing and post-graduate, are essential to support cultural change among MHNs and ensure the appropriate use of CMs and STs. Integrating anti-stigma initiatives and involving MHNs in policy development can strengthen clinical decision-making and foster safer, more ethical, and person-centred psychiatric care.
Organizational culture and readiness are critical determinants of evidence-based practice (EBP) implementation. The Organizational Culture and Readiness Scale for System-Wide Integration of EBP (OCRSIEP), developed within the ARCC framework, is a validated tool to assess these dimensions, but no Italian version currently exists.
To translate, culturally adapt, and psychometrically validate the OCRSIEP and its short form in Italian.
A validation study was conducted, using exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses to derive and test the underlying model, followed by reliability testing with multiple indices and measurement invariance analyses.
Data were collected from 405 Italian nurses. Factor analyses supported a 19-item, six-factor structure explaining 59.5% of the variance, with a second-order factor indicating an overarching construct. The three-item short form showed strong model fit and explained 67% of the variance. Subscales demonstrated acceptable-to-excellent reliability, and partial scalar invariance was established across public and private facilities.
The Italian OCRSIEP scales are valid and reliable tools to assess organizational readiness for EBP implementation. They can guide leaders, educators, and researchers in monitoring, benchmarking, and advancing EBP–oriented system transformation within the Italian healthcare context.
To critically examine the policy logic of the EU-funded WHO Nursing Action Initiative and assess its capacity to address the structural drivers of Europe's nursing workforce instability, with a specific focus on retention governance as the missing determinant of sustainability.
Although Europe reports high aggregate numbers of nurses, persistent workforce shortages are driven not by insufficient supply but by systemic governance weaknesses that undermine retention. The Nursing Action Initiative provides the first coordinated, multi-country framework aligned with the WHO's 2023–2030 strategic priorities, yet several structural gaps, including the absence of binding retention metrics, enforceable safe staffing standards, harmonized advanced practice pathways, interoperable workforce intelligence, and mandatory accountability, limit its transformative potential. A shift from production-centric policies to a retention-driven governance architecture is therefore essential.
The Nursing Action Initiative represents an important step toward strengthening European nursing workforce policy, but its success will depend on Member States' willingness to implement structural reforms that ensure safe staffing, protect nurses' well-being, expand autonomous practice roles, and stabilize workforce distribution. Without a robust architecture of retention governance, neither the sustainability of Europe's nursing workforce nor the resilience of its health systems can be assured.
This commentary advances the policy debate by framing retention as the central determinant of workforce sustainability. It calls for urgent political commitment to move the Nursing Action Initiative beyond aspirational coordination and toward enforceable, system-level reform capable of delivering lasting improvements in workforce stability and quality of care across the European Union.
To explore the impact of systems thinking in nursing leadership on healthcare quality, decision-making and resource management.
A systematic review.
A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus and Web of Science for studies published in English and Italian up to 2024.
Studies were selected based on predefined eligibility criteria, focusing on nursing leadership integrating systems thinking. The Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) checklist was used to assess methodological quality. A narrative synthesis was conducted to identify key themes and patterns.
Fifteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Findings suggest that systems thinking enhances resource management, decision-making and patient safety, while also reducing errors and improving staff collaboration. Adopting a systems approach allows nursing leaders to navigate complex healthcare environments effectively. However, variability in study designs and implementation strategies limits the generalizability of findings.
Integrating systems thinking into nursing leadership promotes a proactive, holistic approach to problem-solving, optimising healthcare outcomes. While evidence supports its benefits, further empirical studies are needed to confirm its effectiveness across diverse healthcare settings.
What problem did the study address? The need for structured systems thinking in nursing leadership. What were the main findings? Improved decision-making, resource optimisation and patient safety through systems-oriented leadership. Where and on whom will the research have an impact? Nurse leaders, healthcare administrators and policymakers in diverse healthcare settings.
Although patients and the public were not directly involved, this study has implications for enhancing patient safety and healthcare efficiency.
To describe the latest information on types of psychosocial interventions and their effectiveness on loneliness reduction among older adults in community and residential care settings, and the experience with these interventions.
Umbrella review.
The Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for umbrella reviews.
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews; Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature; Medline; Embase; Emcare; PsycINFO; ProQuest Dissertation & Thesis Global; Ovid Nursing Database; MedRxvi.
Twenty-two reviews were included. Seven major types of psychosocial intervention were identified: (1) social facilitation interventions, (2) psychological therapies, (3) health and social care provision, (4) animal-assisted interventions, (5) befriending interventions, (6) leisure and skill development, and (7) other interventions. Social facilitation interventions that provide synchronised interaction, psychological therapies, health and social care provision, and animal (−assisted) interventions demonstrated positive effects while leisure/skill development and befriending interventions warrant more rigorous evidence. Group settings, synchronised interaction and purpose-driven are identified as facilitators, whereas technological issues and safety issues are barriers to participation.
Seven types of psychosocial interventions are currently available for loneliness among community-dwelling older adults, and a positive effect in reducing loneliness was demonstrated in some types. Facilitators and barriers to their participation were synthesised. Two future research directions are suggested: (1) reviews on meaning-centred interventions to provide a comprehensive understanding and (2) implementation studies employing community-based paraprofessionals to promote programme scalability and accessibility.
Health and social care practitioners (e.g., nurses), researchers and policymakers are recommended to employ social facilitation interventions with synchronised interaction, psychological therapies, health and social care provision and animal-assisted interventions to address loneliness among community-dwelling older adults.
This review provided empirical information on available effective interventions to address loneliness among community-dwelling older adults. It also provided information for nurses to implement psychosocial interventions in the community.
The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines
This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct or reporting.
PROSPERO CRD 42023482852, registered 25/11/2023
FreshRSS 