To identify the factors associated with low psychological resilience among university students in the Grand Est region of France at the end of the first national COVID-19 lockdown.

A cross-sectional online survey was conducted (May 2020) among students at the University of Lorraine using the LimeSurvey platform and institutional mailing lists.

Higher education setting in north-eastern France, involving students from the University of Lorraine (multicampus public university) and Sciences Po Nancy, a political science institute in the same region.

A total of 3708 students fully completed the online questionnaire, including the Brief Resilience Scale (BRS), resulting in an estimated response rate of 7.1%. All students enrolled at the University of Lorraine and Sciences Po Nancy during the 2019–2020 academic year were eligible to participate.

The primary outcome was psychological resilience, measured using the BRS. Secondary measures included perceived social support assessed with the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support, quality of interpersonal relationships evaluated using the Quality of Interpersonal Relationships Scale (Échelle de la Qualité des Relations Interpersonnelles, EQRI) and frequency of positive and negative thoughts measured with the Thermometer of Thoughts Tool. Factors associated with low resilience were analysed using bivariable and multivariable logistic regression.

Among 3708 students included in the sample, corresponding to a response rate of approximately 7.1%, 50.6% had normal resilience, while 37.3% reported low resilience. Female gender (OR=2.1, 95% CI: 1.8 to 2.6) and low social support (OR=1.7, 95% CI: 1.1 to 2.6) were the factors associated most strongly with low resilience. Negative thoughts (OR=1.4, 95% CI: 1.4 to 1.5), lower quality of relationships with people in general (OR=1.5, 95% CI: 1.3 to 1.8) and studying arts, humanities or languages (OR=1.4, 95% CI: 1.0 to 1.8) were identified as factors associated with low resilience. Increased age (OR=0.9, 95% CI: 0.9 to 1.0) and flat sharing (OR=0.6, 95% CI: 0.4 to 0.9) were inversely associated with low resilience levels.

Resilience seems to be impacted primarily by internal and micro-environmental factors. Consolidating levels of individual resilience of at-risk populations by acting on these factors could be the key to improving their mental health.

Laser corneal refractive surgery is a widely adopted approach for correcting refractive errors, but postoperative dry eye remains a common side effect. Intense pulsed light (IPL) and low-level light therapy (LLLT) are two emerging treatments that have shown potential in managing dry eye disease. However, their role as a prophylactic treatment in patients without pre-existing symptomatic dry eye undergoing refractive surgery has not been explored.

This is a single-blind, randomised controlled trial comparing the prophylactic efficacy of combined IPL and LLLT treatment versus standard care in preventing dry eye after laser corneal refractive surgery (FS-LASIK, SMILE or PRK). Eligible patients aged 18 or older scheduled for surgery will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either the treatment or control group. The primary endpoint is the French version of Ocular Surface Disease Index score at 1 month postoperatively. Secondary outcomes include Fluorescein Break-Up Time, Schirmer I test, Oxford score and Meibomian Gland Dropout. Data will be analysed using a mixed-effects linear model adjusted for surgery type and baseline dry eye parameters. The study started in June 2023 and end in April 2025 but data have not been yet analysed.

The study has been approved by the Institutional Review Board Est III, France, and registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05803798). All participants will provide written informed consent. Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and presentations at scientific conferences.

NCT05803798.

To investigate the correlation between the urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) and adverse cardiovascular outcomes in the Beijing community population.

Prospective cohort study.

Beijing, China, from May 2014 to December 2021.

Recruited from a survey conducted as part of an ongoing atherosclerosis cohort study in the communities of Gucheng and Pingguoyuan, Shijingshan District in Beijing, China. Excluded participants who already had a history of stroke or myocardial infarction at baseline. Finally, 3627 eligible participants were included in this analysis.

The participants were divided into three groups on the basis of baseline UACR: the normal group (UACR

The primary endpoint was a composite endpoint (major adverse cardiovascular event, MACE) of cardiovascular death, first acute myocardial infarction or first stroke, whereas secondary endpoints included cardiovascular death, first acute myocardial infarction, first stroke or all-cause death.

The study included 3627 participants. According to the multivariable Cox model, compared with those in the normal group, the risks of MACE (HR=1.47; 95% CI 1.06 to 2.06; p=0.023), cardiovascular death (HR=3.03; 95% CI 1.56 to 5.88; p=0.001) and all-cause mortality (HR=1.91; 95% CI 1.23 to 2.97; p=0.004) were significantly greater in the microalbuminuria group. The risk of MACE (HR=3.65; 95% CI 2.14 to 6.23; p

This study indicates that an elevated UACR is a significant risk factor for adverse cardiovascular outcomes within the community population. This association remains consistent in individuals with low-grade albuminuria.

To explore patients’ perceptions of managing adverse events (AEs) from anticancer drugs for gynaecological cancer, focusing on AEs they want to avoid, views on dose adjustments and communication with healthcare professionals.

Observational study using a web-based questionnaire.

Women in Japan who had received chemotherapy for endometrial or ovarian/fallopian tube cancer were enrolled. Healthcare professionals, including obstetrics and gynaecology physicians, nurses and pharmacists, who administered chemotherapy to these patients, were also enrolled.

AEs that patients wished to avoid or found distressing; varied perceptions of AEs before and after treatment; discrepancies in the communication of AEs between patients and healthcare professionals; administration time and intervals between hospital visits patients found distressing; patient awareness of dose adjustment (reduction, interruption or discontinuation) to suppress AEs.

Participants comprised 153 physicians, 166 nurses, 154 pharmacists and 154 patients. Nausea/vomiting (28.6%), alopecia (18.2%) and peripheral neuropathy (9.1%) were the most distressing AEs overall. Physicians rated nausea/vomiting lower (15.4%) and alopecia higher (38.2%) than patients, while pharmacists emphasised peripheral neuropathy (25.7%). Many patients found AEs, including peripheral neuropathy (53/99), fatigue (52/105) and alopecia (46/120), to be more severe than expected. Communication patterns revealed that 49.4% of patients reported all symptoms, even uncertain ones, but younger patients tended to communicate fewer symptoms. Physicians (54.2%), nurses (92.2%) and pharmacists (85.7%) preferred full disclosure of symptoms. While 28.6% of patients wished to avoid dose reductions because of fears of disease progression, 18.2% preferred dose reduction or discontinuation when AEs became intolerable. Drug administration times and visit intervals influenced patient distress. Treatment administration of over 3 hours (19.5%) and visits occurring more frequently than once every 3 weeks (27.3%) were the most distressing.

This study highlights discrepancies in AE perceptions and communication between patients and healthcare professionals, emphasising the need for tailored communication strategies and shared decision-making to improve cancer treatment experiences and outcomes.

jRCT1040220088, Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCT).

Stroke is one of the top causes of disability in Malaysia, yet caregivers have limited access to structured, culturally tailored education to support poststroke care.

To develop and validate the CaknaStrok Education Package (CEP), a blended learning intervention comprising a printed guidebook and a trilingual mobile health application for informal stroke caregivers in Malaysia.

Methodological study involving the development and validation of a caregiver education programme guided by the Analyse, Design, Develop, Implement, Evaluate (ADDIE) instructional design framework.

Development and validation were conducted in Malaysia between January 2022 and December 2023. Both experts and caregivers were recruited from two tertiary hospitals on the East Coast of Malaysia, with caregivers identified from inpatient wards and outpatient clinics at these hospitals.

Content validation involved 10 multidisciplinary experts. Face validation involved 14 informal stroke caregivers who met eligibility criteria, and all completed the study.

CEP was developed based on prior needs assessment and expert input. Content validation was undertaken using the Content Validity Index (CVI) and face validation using the Face Validity Index (FVI), both assessed on a four-point Likert scale. Qualitative feedback was also obtained from the participants.

CEP consists of six modules delivered via a printed guidebook and a trilingual app with videos, assessment tools and local resources. Experts rated the content highly valid (Scale-level (S)-CVI/the average method (Ave): 0.97–0.99 across domains). Caregivers reported strong acceptability (S-FVI/Ave: 0.95–0.99). Qualitative feedback from experts and caregivers informed refinements to content clarity, usability and presentation, including improved navigation, consistent language use and enhanced visual design. Suggestions requiring substantial structural changes were documented for future iterations.

The CEP shows strong content and face validity as a blended caregiver education tool. By combining printed and digital formats, CEP addresses cultural and access challenges and provides a scalable model for stroke caregiver education in Malaysia. Further pilot or feasibility studies are warranted to evaluate usability, engagement and implementation in real-world settings prior to effectiveness evaluation.

Findings of previous studies on associations between dairy consumption and metabolic health status were inconsistent. This study aimed to assess the link between consumption of dairy foods and metabolic health status, brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and adropin levels in adults.

Cross-sectional.

An observational study in Isfahan, Iran.

Adults (n=527) selected by multistage cluster random sampling. Dietary intakes were assessed via a validated 168-item food frequency questionnaire.

Anthropometric indices, blood pressure and biochemical parameters were assessed. The criteria proposed by Wildman et al were used to categorise participants into metabolically healthy and metabolically unhealthy (MU).

Participants had a mean age of 42.66 years (45.7% women). Moderate consumption of total dairy was, respectively, linked to 58% lower odds of MU (OR _{T2 vs T1}=0.42; 95% CI 0.18 to 0.96), after taking all confounders into account. Participants in the middle versus low tertile of low-fat dairy intake showed 51% marginally lower odds of MU (OR _{T2 vs T1}=0.49; 95% CI 0.22 to 1.08; p=0.08). No significant association was discovered between high-fat dairy intake and MU chance. However, higher total dairy intake was associated with lower odds of hypertension (OR _{T3 vs T1}=0.36; 95% CI: 0.14 to 0.93). No significant associations were observed between dairy intake and BDNF or adropin levels.

Moderate consumption of total and low-fat dairy was associated with lower odds of being metabolically unhealthy in Iranian adults, but high-fat dairy intake was not. Hypertension was less common among individuals with higher dairy intake. No association was found between dairy intake and serum levels of BDNF or adropin.

Cancer is the leading cause of death and morbidity among children and adolescents worldwide. Functionality-based interventions are relevant among children and adolescents with an oncological diagnosis, whence studies summarising evidence on this topic are needed. This systematic review will summarise evidence on the effect of interventions to improve functionality indicators among paediatric patients diagnosed with cancer.

This protocol will follow Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA)-Protocols reporting guidelines. The systematic review will be conducted according to the Cochrane Handbook and PRISMA 2020. Studies will be searched in MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase, Web of Science, CENTRAL, LILACS and PEDro. Additional searches will include Google Scholar, reference lists of included studies, relevant reviews and trial registries. Studies will be included if they implement a functionality-based intervention. They must evaluate effects among paediatric patients with an oncological diagnosis. Secondary outcomes will include health-related quality of life. There will be no limits to language or year of publication, and articles published in peer-reviewed journals will be accepted. Only randomised controlled trials will be included. Risk of bias will be assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool 2. Two independent reviewers will select studies, extract data and assess risk of bias. A narrative synthesis and meta-analysis will be conducted if studies are clinically and methodologically homogeneous. Statistical heterogeneity will be assessed using Higgins’ inconsistency test (I^²). Meta-analysis may estimate combined effects using random-effects and the inverse variance method. The R statistical software will be used. The certainty of evidence will be evaluated for each outcome using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation system.

This study used data from previously published studies, thus waiving submission to an Ethics Committee. Scientific dissemination strategies will include publication in peer-reviewed journals, conference presentations and workshops for the public.

CRD42024462833.

Osteoporosis (OP) is a systemic skeletal disorder that increases fragility and susceptibility to fractures. Despite the availability of teriparatide for the treatment of patients with acute fractures with better efficacy, its long-term daily injection and high cost limit its broader use among a wider patient population, especially for those living in low- and middle-income countries. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of a novel sequential treatment with teriparatide daily for 6 months followed by denosumab every 6 months for another 18 months, in comparison with denosumab monotherapy every 6 months for 24 months, in reducing the risk of fractures in patients with newly diagnosed osteoporotic fractures. The study will also explore the possible difference between two sequential treatments (shifting to denosumab treatment at 6 or 12 months) in their effect on increasing bone mineral density (BMD).

This study is designed as a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial among 2478 patients with newly diagnosed osteoporotic fractures from 58 hospitals across China. Participants will be randomly assigned in a 10:10:1 ratio to three treatment groups: 24 months of denosumab monotherapy, early sequential treatment (teriparatide for 6 months followed by denosumab for 18 months) and late sequential treatment (teriparatide for 12 months followed by denosumab for 12 months). The primary outcome is the incidence of vertebral fractures over 24 months of treatment. Secondary outcomes include changes in BMD at the lumbar spine, total hip and femoral neck, changes in bone turnover markers (β-carboxy-terminal telopeptide of type 1 collagen and procollagen type 1 N-terminal propeptide), treatment adherence and cost-effectiveness. Follow-up assessments are scheduled at 3, 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24 months post-randomisation for primary and secondary outcomes, and biannually afterwards for the primary outcome.

The study protocol has been registered on ClinicalTrials.gov and has received ethical approval from the Peking Union Medical College Hospital Medical Science Research Ethics Committee (1-22PJ939). The findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed scientific journals.

NCT05866029.

To use best practices in pharmacoepidemiology to assess the association between new use of brain-penetrant calcium channel blockers (BP-CCBs) compared with use of non-brain-penetrant CCBs (NP-CCBs) and the incidence of neuropsychiatric outcomes.

Retrospective comparative cohort study.

Secondary data from nine claims and electronic health record databases from across the globe were used.

First use of a CCB was the index date. There were 1.2 million BP-CCB patients and 9.3 million NP-CCB patients identified across all databases, with 881 758 matched in each group.

Patients were categorised as either initiating BP-CCBs or NP-CCBs. On-treatment and intention-to-treat analyses were conducted. Large-scale propensity models were used to match cohorts and control for observed confounding. Cox models were used to analyse the time to incident neuropsychiatric disorders. Negative control outcomes were used to calibrate estimates, CIs and p values to account for residual confounding. Diagnostics were used to assess the validity of the analysis.

The time to first diagnosis of schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, major depressive disorder (MDD) and bipolar disorder was assessed independently. HRs compared the BP-CCB group to the NP-CCB group.

For the outcome of incident MDD in the intention-to-treat design, the meta-analytic HR (95% CI) was 1.02 (0.97, 1.08). Meta-analytic HRs for bipolar disorder (1.04 (0.96, 1.13)), schizophrenia (1.05 (0.94, 1.18)) and schizoaffective disorder (1.04 (0.87, 1.23)) showed similar null effects. The on-treatment analysis was largely consistent: MDD (1.01 (0.96, 1.06)), bipolar (1.05 (0.86, 1.27)), schizophrenia (1.09 (0.87, 1.38)) and schizoaffective (1.00 (0.71, 1.40)).

There was no evidence of an association with any of the neuropsychiatric conditions of interest between use of BP-CCB and NP-CCB. This does not rule out the potential beneficial effect of CCB formulations and doses targeted specifically for the brain rather than the cardiovascular system.

Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is a widely used renal replacement therapy for chronic kidney disease patients, yet malnutrition remains a common complication linked to poor outcomes. Nearly 40% of PD patients in China are malnourished, with serum albumin levels below 35 g/L. Amino acid-based peritoneal dialysis solutions (AA-PDS), which replace glucose with amino acids as the osmotic agent, have been used globally for decades to improve nutrition and reduce peritoneal damage, but they were introduced to mainland China only in 2022. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of AA-PDS in improving nutritional status and clinical outcomes among malnourished PD patients in mainland China, providing a potential new therapeutic option for this population.

This multicentre, open-label, prospective, parallel-controlled study will enrol patients with end-stage kidney disease who were stable on PD for more than 3 months. A total of 500 eligible patients will be divided into the intervention group undergoing PD once every morning using 2.0 L of amino acid (15) PD solution and the control group using conventional PD solution (lactate) in a 4:1 ratio based on their willingness and clinical needs. Our primary outcome is serum albumin, while other nutritional indicators, including serum prealbumin, serum transferrin, total cholesterol, triglycerides, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and ultrafiltration volumes are considered secondary outcomes. Information such as demographics, clinical and biochemical characteristics, examination indicators, anthropometry measurements and Subjective Global Assessment scores will be collected at baseline, 1 month, 3 month and 6 month follow-up. Statistical analysis will be conducted using SAS V.9.4 or higher versions. All statistical tests are conducted through the two-tailed test, and a p value≤0.05 will be considered statistically significant. The description of quantitative indicators will be used in calculating the number of cases, mean, SD, median and IQR method. The classification indicators will be used to describe the number of cases and percentages (frequency and frequency rate).

This multicentre study obtained ethical approval from the lead ethics committee at the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University (approval no.: 2024-KLS-379-02). Additionally, each participating site provided local ethical approval or a formal waiver, as required by their institutional policies. The results will be reported in a peer-reviewed journal and a relevant academic conference.

ChiCTR2400090896.

To evaluate the prognostic significance of tumour deposit (TD) across different N stages in patients with stage III colon cancer and to develop and validate a novel N staging system that incorporates TD count to improve prediction of cancer-specific survival (CSS).

Retrospective cohort study based on population-based data and external validation.

Secondary and tertiary care settings; data from the SEER database, a population-based cancer registry capturing cancer incidence and survival information (USA, 2010–2017); and a single-centre validation cohort from South China (2015–2019).

A total of 8739 stage III colon cancer patients from the SEER database who underwent curative surgery were included; 1335 (15.3%) had TD. Patients with

The outcome was cancer-specific survival (CSS). The prognostic impact of tumour deposit (TD) and the comparative performance of the novel N staging system versus the AJCC system were evaluated using the Fine-Gray competing risks model, time-dependent area under the curve (AUC) and Brier score.

TD was independently associated with poorer CSS: 1 TD (SHR=1.23, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.47, p=0.017), 2–3 TDs (SHR=1.36, 95% CI 1.17 to 1.58, p3 TDs (SHR=2.02, 95% CI 1.73 to 2.35, pet al, TDs were converted to metastatic lymph nodes (mLNs) using the following weighting: 1 TD=3 mLNs (N1c), 1 TD=2 mLNs (N1) and 1 TD=1 mLN (N2). The novel N staging system stratified patients as nN1a (1 nLN), nN1b (2–3 nLNs), nN2a (4–6 nLNs) and nN2b (≥7 nLNs). This approach showed improved prognostic accuracy compared with AJCC N staging: 3-year AUC (0.623 vs 0.614) and Brier score (0.151 vs 0.157, p

TD significantly worsens prognosis in stage III colon cancer, particularly in lower N stages. Incorporating TD counts into the N staging system with different weightings based on N stage enhances prognostic accuracy and risk stratification within stage III disease, particularly for the heterogeneous AJC N1c category. This novel staging system provides better prognostic value and more accurate treatment guidance and should be considered for broader clinical use, subject to further (eg, prospective) validation.

Clinical research in emergency and critical care is vital, but recruitment and consent are complex. Research may be conducted without prior consent when patients are critically ill, and interventions are time critical. Some patients may die before research participation can be discussed with relatives, leaving the bereaved unaware of their involvement. This study explored potential communication strategies for informing bereaved relatives when a patient has died following enrolment into an emergency or critical care study without prior consent.

A mixed-methods study using a telephone survey and semi-structured interviews conducted simultaneously. The survey was conducted within a National Health Service Trust in North West England with relatives of deceased study participants. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with bereaved relatives and research and clinical staff across the UK, and medical examiner (ME)/ME officers based in England and Wales. Quantitative data were analysed descriptively, and qualitative data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. Data were synthesised using a constant comparison approach.

11 bereaved relatives completed the survey. 53 individuals (21 research and clinical staff, 18 relatives and 14 MEs/officers) participated in semi-structured interviews.

Although many trials do not include a process for notifying bereaved relatives about research participation, most relatives valued the opportunity to learn about their family member’s participation, emphasising the importance of transparency and trust. However, some raised concerns over the potential burden of automatic disclosure by the ME service. Offering bereaved relatives the option to receive sensitively worded information about research involvement at an appropriate time, soon after death, was recommended.

Bereaved relatives should have the choice to be informed about research participation without prior consent. Our findings support the need for transparent and sensitive communication and will contribute to future guidance for the design and conduct of adult emergency and critical care studies.

Adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder is a common shoulder disease. With the ageing population, the incidence of adhesive capsulitis has been rising year by year, posing a significant threat to the quality of life of middle-aged and elderly individuals. As one of the main means of treating adhesive capsulitis, manipulation under anaesthesia (MUA) can achieve good clinical results while maintaining high economic benefits. The purpose of this study is to investigate the prognostic factors and the longitudinal recovery trajectory of patients, so as to provide a basis for the precise treatment of MUA.

The study is a longitudinal prospective cohort study with a 12-month follow-up. A trajectory analysis model (latent growth curve modelling) will be used to observe the recovery changes of adhesive capsulitis patients. Linear mixed-effects models will be employed to analyse the prognostic factors of adhesive capsulitis.

Ethical approval was obtained from the Institutional Review Board of Shuguang Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (approval number: 2025-1707-047-02), following ethical guidelines and standard reporting practices. The research findings will be disseminated through presentations at both regional and global medical conferences.

ChiCTR2500100645.

Individuals with incomplete spinal cord injury (iSCI) often experience impaired balance control and turning-while-walking ability, which increase the risk of falls and limit their community mobility. While overground exoskeleton training has shown promise in improving gait and balance, evidence from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) on ambulation of individuals with iSCI remains limited. This protocol outlines a cluster RCT investigating the effectiveness of overground exoskeleton-assisted gait training compared with conventional training and usual care in improving turning-while-walking performence, balance control, and functional mobility in individuals with iSCI.

This multicentre, cluster RCT will compare 12-week interventions across three groups: (1) overground exoskeleton training group, (2) conventional training group and (3) usual care group. Participants with ambulatory iSCI will be recruited from three centres in Hong Kong SAR and mainland China. Primary outcomes include turning duration and number of steps during a 2-m turning-while-walking test. Secondary outcomes include static and dynamic balance, sensorimotor integration, gait performance, muscle strength, spasticity, quality of life, self-efficacy and fall incidence. Assessments will be conducted at baseline, mid-intervention, postintervention and at the 1-month follow-up.

This study has received approval from the Research Ethics Committees of Hong Kong Metropolitan University, the Affiliated BenQ Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, and Changzhou Sunshine Rehabilitation Hospital. Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants before enrolment. Study findings will be shared through peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations and summaries available to participants upon request.

NCT06971510.

Acute pain following pulmonary surgery can affect the recovery process of patients. The use of intrathecal morphine (ITM) injections offers a long-lasting analgesic effect, but its clinical application remains controversial. This study aims to investigate the impact of combining bupivacaine with ITM injections on the quality of postoperative recovery in patients who have undergone pulmonary surgery.

This multicentre, randomised, double-blind, controlled trial will enrol 254 patients undergoing elective lung surgery, who will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either group IT (receiving an intrathecal injection of 3 mg bupivacaine and 0.25 mg morphine before general anaesthesia induction) or the control group (C group). The primary outcome includes postoperative recovery quality on day 1 (quality of recovery, QoR-15), with secondary outcomes encompassing postoperative recovery quality on days 2 and 3 (QoR-15), pain scores within 72 hours postoperatively, analgesic rescue, intraoperative haemodynamic parameters, opioid consumption, postoperative adverse reactions, recovery metrics, complications, chronic pain incidence and sleep quality.

The results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications. This study protocol (V.2.0, 30 October 2024) involves human participants and has been approved by the Ethics Committee of Affiliated Hospital of Yangzhou University (number 2024-08-02-2), Taicang Hospital Affiliated to Soochow University (number 2025 SR-041) and Yichang Central People’s Hospital (number 2024-513-02). Each individual who agrees to participate in the research will provide written informed consent after the objectives and procedures of this study are explained to them.

ChiCTR2400092935. Registered on 26 November 2024.

Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly evolving, offering an expanding suite of capabilities that go beyond the traditional focus on prediction and classification. Generative AI (GenAI) and agentic AI could create transformative practices to support real-world evidence (RWE) generation for health research by streamlining studies, accelerating insights and improving decision-making. However, there is no published overview available describing the range of applications in RWE generation. This review aims to describe where and how genAI and agentic AI are applied across the domains of healthcare research tasks for RWE generation. Additionally, to map applications by tasks and methods across the product lifecycle continuum, and to identify emerging gaps and opportunities.

This Living Scoping Review (LSR) will include studies reporting an application and/or evaluation of genAI or agentic AI applied to one or more RWE generation research tasks. Searches will be conducted in Embase, MEDLINE and additional sources (eg, grey literature). Citations will be independently screened by two human senior reviewers for a substantive training dataset and a commercially available screening algorithm (Robot Screener) will complete screening with a human reviewer. The LSR will include reports of studies (primary or reviews) describing and/or evaluating the application of any genAI model for RWE generation in healthcare, in English, published from 1 January 2025 to the date of search. Data will be extracted from all studies included in the LSR by one independent senior reviewer using a piloted template, with 10% quality check by a second senior reviewer. Descriptive statistics will be used to summarise the applications of genAI per RWE research task, and the results of genAI evaluations. Thematic analysis will be used to describe genAI application patterns, trends, gaps and opportunities. The LSR protocol and reports will be updated annually, and findings will be published on a publicly available website (eg, ISPE—the International Society for Pharmacoepidemiology).

Ethical approval is not required due to use of previously published data. Planned dissemination includes peer-reviewed publication, presentation and short summaries.

Black women in early midlife experience disproportionate exposure to stress and elevated cardiovascular risk, including hypertension. Despite this, few stress management interventions are designed with and for this population. This study aims to explore the lived experiences of stress and coping among black women in early midlife with elevated blood pressure to inform the codesign of a culturally relevant, multilevel stress management intervention.

We will conduct one-time, semistructured focus groups with black women aged 35–50 who have elevated blood pressure, recruited from a large safety-net health system. Data will be analysed using a constructivist grounded theory approach, with inductive theme development supported by line-by-line, focused and theoretical coding. The Social Determinants of Cardiovascular Disease framework will serve as a sensitising guide to multilevel contextual factors rather than a prescriptive coding structure. An artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted analytic component will complement human-led analysis by supporting preliminary theme exploration and enhancing transparency.

Approved by the Indiana University Institutional Review Board (Protocol #21785). All participants will provide written informed consent. Findings will be shared via peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations and lay summaries for stakeholders.

In the field of medicine, there has been a growing understanding of the impact of social and economic inequities on patients’ health outcomes. Social medicine was established with the intention of addressing these social and economic drivers of health when caring for patients. Physicians who practise social medicine aim to take an interdisciplinary and interprofessional approach to patient care with an emphasis on the promotion of health equity and patient advocacy. As the effects of social determinants of health (SDOH) on health outcomes have become more widely appreciated, medical professional organisations and accrediting bodies have advocated for formal education on the impact of SDOH in undergraduate and graduate medical curricula. The goal of this scoping review is to examine how undergraduate and graduate medical education programmes in the USA have implemented social medicine concepts into their curricula.

The proposed scoping review will be conducted in accordance with the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews. The review team worked with a medical librarian, who created a unique search for five databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL Register of Controlled Trials, ERIC and the Web of Science Core Collection). Additionally, we will conduct a grey literature search that includes medical school and residency programme websites, as well as Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC), Council of Residency Directors in Emergency Medicine (CORD), Alliance for Academic Internal Medicine (AAIM) and Society for Academic Emergency Medicine (SAEM) conference abstracts. Two independent reviewers will assess all articles for eligibility. Data will be extracted using the Covidence data extraction tool. We will present the results of the extraction in tabular form. Themes identified during the full-text review and data extraction process will be discussed.

Data will be gathered from publicly accessible sources, so ethics approval is not necessary. The results will be disseminated through a peer-reviewed journal and reported at conferences related to medical education and social medicine.

This protocol is registered on OSF (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/7PZ8U).

To assess the acceptability and adoption of multiparameter point-of-care testing (POCT) devices for the diagnosis and management of non-communicable diseases (NCDs) at the primary healthcare level in a resource-limited region of Peru.

Qualitative case-control process evaluation.

Eight primary healthcare facilities in northern Peru, including both urban and rural centres, where routine chronic care and laboratory services are provided.

Sixty-three participants: 36 patients, 12 laboratory technicians, 10 healthcare professionals and five facility heads. Eligible patients were ≥18 years, residing in the catchment area, with or without prior NCD diagnoses. Healthcare workers, including physicians, nurses, laboratory staff and facility managers.

Multiparameter POCT devices were installed in four intervention facilities, accompanied by staff training and community awareness activities, while four control facilities continued with conventional laboratory diagnostics.

Primary outcome: perceptions of patients and healthcare workers regarding the acceptability and adoption of POCT devices. Secondary outcomes: identification of facilitators and barriers to implementation, including infrastructure, supply chains and training gaps.

(1) Individuals: POCT was valued for speed and comfort, but concerns over accuracy were mentioned. (2) Intervention characteristics: laboratory staff valued POCT’s practicality in emergencies, but noted limitations in handling multiple samples. (3) Outer setting: urban centres outperformed rural facilities, with more staff and longer operating hours. (4) Inner setting: calibration gaps impacted POCT and conventional test reliability, requiring quality control and training. (5) Process: clear staff communication boosted patient confidence in POCT, but inconsistent training could lead to reliability doubts.

Multiparameter POCT devices show promise for enhancing NCD care in resource-limited primary healthcare settings, particularly in rural areas. However, their sustainability depends on broader health system reforms, including reliable supply chains, expanded training and stronger quality assurance mechanisms. Further research should examine strategies for embedding POCT within national regulatory and policy frameworks.

Microcirculatory dysfunction drives the end-organ pathophysiology of circulatory shock but is not reflected within existing clinical indices of perfusion, such as blood pressure. The choroidal vasculature of the retina can be measured non-invasively and we hypothesised that this may reflect dysfunction in other organs. We tested the feasibility of measuring the choroid in intensive care and explored associations between choroidal measurements and clinical parameters.

A pilot study of optical coherence tomography conducted in a sample of general intensive care unit (ICU) patients.

A tertiary mixed ICU within the UK.

15 patients were recruited. One patient was excluded following withdrawal of active treatment. 12/14 (86%) of the remaining patients had successful baseline imaging and 6 (40%) of these had follow-up imaging within intensive care. These patients had a mean age of 56.3 years, were 71% (10/14) male and mean Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation 2 (APACHE2) score on ICU admission was 20.4.

Choroidal anatomy, including choroidal and suprachoroidal thickness, as well as volumetric analysis of intrachoroidal blood vessels, was assessed using automated image segmentation along with clinical, physiological and biochemical data at ICU admission and after an interval of 12–72 hours. Feasibility and safety data were assessed throughout ICU admission.

Baseline choroidal vascular index and choroidal thickness were positively associated with fluid balance, and negatively with APACHE2 score, haematocrit and albumin content. A measurable suprachoroidal space was seen in nine (75%) patients (range 25.0–110.0 microns) and was inversely associated with heart rate. There was substantial intraindividual variation in choroidal measurements over time. There were no safety concerns.

Measuring the choroid is feasible in patients with Intensive Care Society Level 2 or Level 3 requirements. The suprachoroidal space may be markedly enlarged in these patients. Exploratory associations with systemic variables suggest that the choroid may provide information about the microvascular function of other major organs. Size and change of choroidal measurements may reflect perfusion pressure and vascular leakage.