Conectar
To identify healthcare professionals' experiences of innovation competence and the factors associated with it; and to examine the instruments developed to assess innovation competence and its associated factors among healthcare professionals.
A mixed-methods systematic review.
Researchers independently screened original studies by title and abstract (n = 2996) and then full text (n = 189). Eighteen studies were included: 16 quantitative and two qualitative. Qualitative data were analysed using inductive content analysis, and quantitative data were tabulated and synthesised narratively.
The review followed the Joanna Briggs Institute Mixed Methods Systematic Review methodology. Searches were conducted in Scopus, CINAHL, Ovid Medline, ProQuest, Web of Science, PsycArticles, and Medic. Articles published in English or Finnish with no date restrictions were included. The search covered records from database inception to August 2024.
From qualitative studies, we identified three categories describing experiences of innovation competence: Competences for Innovation in Healthcare, Application and Impact of Innovation in Healthcare, and Challenges and Strategies for Implementing Innovation. Quantitative studies identified three conceptual domains: Individual Capacities in Innovation, Innovation-related Competence Behaviours, and Social and Organisational Enablers. Four categories of factors associated with innovation competence emerged: sociodemographic, career-related, organisational, and academic factors.
Healthcare professionals' innovation competence is a multifaceted construct encompassing individual abilities, behavioural expressions, and social and organisational engagement. A systematic and multilevel approach that targets both personal attributes and organisational enablers is needed to strengthen competence. Enhancing innovation competence can improve the healthcare sector's ability to respond to complex challenges and sustain innovation capacity.
Findings inform the development of education programmes and leadership strategies to enhance innovation competence among healthcare professionals, supporting innovation implementation in healthcare organisations.
No patient or public involvement was included in this study.
PROSPERO: CRD42024614551
To explore whether a delay from referral to first contact with nurse-led community health services is associated with the likelihood of subsequent emergency department attendance.
We use individual linked administrative data on use of community health and hospital services. We identify a cohort of 343,721 individuals referred to community health services in England by their primary care provider in 2019. We then track their subsequent community healthcare contacts and emergency department attendances.
We exploit variation in the time to contact caused by weekend delays, which create longer times to first contact for people referred later in the working week. The main analysis compares patients referred on Thursday with those referred on Tuesday.
We show that 6.7% of patients referred on Thursday wait an extra two days for their first community contact relative to those referred on Tuesday. Despite this delay, we find no evidence that people referred on Thursday are more likely to have a subsequent emergency department attendance compared to those referred on Tuesday.
We do not find delayed community health services contact to be associated with an increased risk of emergency attendance amongst patients referred to community services by their primary care provider. This suggests that short delays in contact time are not detrimental for this group.
Shifting care from hospital to community settings is a key priority for health systems internationally. In England, community health services face significant staffing shortages, limiting the extent to which services can be responsive and support the desired strategic shift. Our findings suggest that these constrained community providers could use their limited capacity to prioritise responding quickly to other patients without harming those referred via primary care.
STROBE guidelines.
This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct, or reporting.
To evaluate whether information about patients' poor sense of security in hypothetical vignette scenarios increases nurses' projected intent to report safety events.
Quantitative, cross-sectional factorial survey vignette experiment administered online.
A convenience sample of 60 nurses from adult inpatient hospital units at a Midwest academic medical center participated in February 2025. Participants responded to demographic questions and eight factorial vignettes, each describing a patient-reported safety breach and incorporating four patient-related factors. Four vignettes included information that the patient had a poor sense of security, and four did not, presented in random order. Following each vignette, participants rated their level of concern about the patient's report, perceived harm to the patient, and likelihood of reporting the patient's concern. A linear mixed-effects modelling approach, accounting for clustering within participants, was used to estimate the effects of the sense of security information factor on nurses' responses.
The sense of security information was associated with higher ratings of (a) degree of concern, (b) perceived harm to the patient, and (c) intent to report the patient's concern, after adjusting for vignette- and participant-level covariates. The vignette patient's perception of physical harm was positively associated with all three ratings. Nurses' greater hospital experience was associated with lower ratings across outcomes.
Obtaining information that the patient felt insecure was associated with heightened concern about the safety event, greater perceived harm, and increased intent to report the concern.
Sense of security assessment may be a risk-agnostic, patient-centered intervention that nurses can routinely perform, regardless of the safety event circumstances.
Although a system of evidence-based practices within a safety culture is essential to hospital safety efforts, nurses' judgements of and responses to patient safety concerns play a critical role and should not be overlooked.
STROBE guidelines.
This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct, or reporting.
Robotic rehabilitation on locomotion is a new approach in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and previous studies showed its feasibility. In this study, we aim to evaluate safety, patient’s experience and efficacy of a gait training programme with the Atalante exoskeleton, compared with usual care, on walking ability, functional capacity and other symptoms associated with ALS.
EXALS is a monocentric, prospective, interventional, open trial. 20 slowly progressing patients with gait deficits will be recruited. The study is conducted in three phases, each lasting 6 weeks, following the ABA procedure. Phase B represents the intervention phase, during which patients practise their gait training at a rhythm of three sessions/week, as an add-on to usual care. In the two phases A, patients receive usual care with no additional treatment. An evaluation is planned before, in the middle and at the end of each phase. The primary outcome of the study is safety and tolerability of the Atalante exoskeleton. Secondary outcomes include: participants’ subjective impact and experience, attitude and motivation, efficacy and interactivity of the exoskeleton, walking ability, functional capacity, spasticity, balance, postural stability, lower limb muscle strength, quality of life, pain, fatigue, anxiety and depression. Statistical analyses will include descriptive methods for all variables and adverse events. Quantitative outcomes are analysed using repeated-measures ANOVA (analysis of variance) across the seven visits, with post hoc tests applied when appropriate. Nominal outcomes are evaluated using Cochran’s Q test with McNemar pairwise comparisons when significant. Associations between variables are examined using Spearman correlation coefficients. Missing data will be replaced using linear interpolation, and sensitivity analyses will be planned. Qualitative interview data are analysed using thematic analysis.
This study was approved by the French ethics committee CPP Nord-Ouest I (no. 23.02378.000201). Participant data are anonymised and securely stored in the laboratory’s database, accessible only to the research team. Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals and conferences.
The objective of this scoping review is to identify and describe factors that affect access to post-sepsis care. Considering the burden faced by sepsis survivors, it is important to understand the facilitators and barriers to accessing post-sepsis care to facilitate the design and implementation of patient-centred and equitable pathways to care.
This scoping review will include studies that consider individuals who have experienced sepsis and any factors that may affect access to care, including comorbidities, discharge setting and social determinants of health. A comprehensive search of MEDLINE, Embase, Emcare, HealthSTAR and Scopus will be conducted. The extracted data will be summarised and presented thematically.
Approval from a research ethics board is not required for this review as it is a synthesis of information from studies where the primary investigators have already received approval from their respective ethics boards. Once complete, the review will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal, and the findings will be shared to local and national forums.
This review has been uploaded and registered under Open Science Framework. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/JMFW2
Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a complex syndrome characterised by primary cardiac dysfunction. Despite advances in therapeutic options such as mechanical cardiac support, it remains associated with high mortality. Although previous registries have described heterogeneous populations and outcomes across different centres, contemporary real-world data on management practices remain limited. This gap is particularly evident in low- and middle-income countries, where there is no robust registry that clearly defines the current state of CS management. Therefore, a multicentre registry is needed to better characterise current practices and outcomes. Our study aims to gain insight into current therapeutic trends in Mexico, a low- to middle-income country with a significant cardiovascular disease burden.
The Mexican Registry of Cardiogenic Shock is a quality initiative that aims to identify therapeutic trends, demographic characteristics and clinical presentations. It also aims to evaluate outcomes, including mortality and cognitive function at in-hospital and 1-year follow-ups, and to identify areas for improvement in the care process across the broad spectrum of CS.
Ethical approval for this multicentre study was obtained from the local research ethics committees of all participating institutions. The study results will be disseminated to all participating institutions in the form of summary reports and presentations on completion of the analysis.
To explore stakeholder experiences with implementing the living guideline (LG) development framework in oncology, and to identify barriers, facilitators and solutions to support its uptake and sustainability.
An exploratory sequential mixed methods design was used, beginning with qualitative semi-structured interviews with guideline development stakeholders, analysed thematically; and followed by a cross-sectional survey to quantitatively rate the importance of factors identified in phase one.
National and international oncology guideline development programmes using the LG development framework.
Stakeholders involved in LG development, including expert panel co-chairs, panel members, patient representatives, methodologists and administrative staff.
Nine stakeholders participated in qualitative interviews, and 45 completed the survey. Most participants were male (5/9:56% qualitative; 26/45:58% quantitative) and based in the US (7/9:78% and 29/45:64%, respectively). Overall, the results from both the qualitative and quantitative strand revealed seven themes (34 subthemes) as barriers and six themes (21 subthemes) as facilitators. Additionally, 9 themes were proposed as solutions. The most frequently reported barriers included evidence timeliness, interpretation and publication delays. Prominent facilitators included effective management, resource optimisation and panel engagement. Participants strongly endorsed investment in artificial intelligence enhanced tools to improve the speed and efficiency of evidence acquisition and review.
While the LG framework provides strong methodological guidance, its practical application presents notable challenges, particularly in resource demands and implementation logistics. Successful adoption requires adequate infrastructure, expertise and oversight. These findings highlight critical considerations for developers aiming to implement sustainable LG models in oncology and beyond.
To identify behavioural and household factors associated with poor oral hygiene among Japanese kindergarten children in a population with high health awareness, using the Debris Index-Simplified (DI-S) as a clinical proxy for early oral hygiene deterioration.
Cross-sectional study.
Seven kindergartens in Sapporo city, Japan.
Of the 1229 kindergarten children invited, 871 provided parental consent (consent rate: 70.9%). Among them, 675 children aged 1–6 years who completed both the questionnaire and oral examination (completion rate: 54.9%). Most post-consent losses were due to logistical and staffing constraints. Children were stratified into ≤3 year and ≥4 year academic classes.
The primary outcome was oral hygiene status based on the DI-S scores (categorised as good (DI-S=0) or poor (DI-S>0). The secondary outcome was the presence of dental caries, defined as decayed, missing and filled primary teeth: dmft≥1. Multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate associations between poor oral hygiene and behavioural and household factors.
Among the 675 children, 168 children (24.9%) exhibited poor oral hygiene (DI-S>0) and 89 children (13.2%) had dental caries (dmft≥1). In multivariable analysis adjusted for demographic, dental and dietary variables, poor oral hygiene was significantly associated with being from a multiple-child household (OR 1.67, 95% CI 1.16 to 2.42) and irregular juice consumption (OR 1.60, 95% CI 1.07 to 2.38). Age-stratified analysis revealed that these associations persisted among those in the ≥4 year class, with additional significance for infrequent tooth brushing (
In a high health awareness Japanese preschool population, poor oral hygiene was independently associated with household composition and juice consumption, rather than traditional dental behaviours. These findings suggest the need to broaden preventive strategies beyond routine dental guidance to include family structure and dietary patterns, particularly in low-prevalence settings. Differential associations between DI-S and caries experience emphasise the utility of early clinical indices in oral health promotion.
Outcome reporting in studies on sacrococcygeal teratoma (SCT) is highly heterogeneous, which limits comparability across studies and thus hampers the development of international treatment guidelines.
Variation in treatment and access to facilities contributes to differences in outcome reporting between centres and countries. Establishing a Core Outcome Set (COS) can improve consistency in outcome reporting and facilitate global collaboration and data comparison. We therefore aim to develop a Core Outcome Set for SCT (COS-SCT) using the Delphi method to achieve consensus on key outcomes. This will enhance the standardisation of outcome reporting and improve the quality of research and clinical care for SCT patients globally.
The development of the COS-SCT will consist of three phases. First, a systematic review will be performed to identify outcomes reported in studies on the surgical treatment of SCT in children. Second, an international Delphi survey will be conducted among key stakeholders, including clinicians, researchers and patient representatives, to establish consensus on outcome prioritisation. Finally, a consensus meeting with representatives from all stakeholder groups will be held to ratify the final Core Outcome Set. The study will follow methodological guidance from the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) initiative and will be developed and reported in accordance with the Core Outcome Set Standards for Development (COS-STAD) and Core Outcome Set Standards for Reporting (COS-STAR).
The medical research ethics committee of the Amsterdam University Medical Centre (Amsterdam UMC) confirmed that the Dutch Medical Research Involving Human Subjects Act (WMO) does not apply to this study, and therefore a full review by the ethics committee is not required. This study is registered in the COMET initiative database. Results will be disseminated in peer-reviewed academic journals and conference presentations.
Trial registration number: COMET registration number 3485
Postoperative pain is common, with approximately one-third of surgical patients experiencing severe acute pain and 10–20% developing chronic post-surgical pain (CPSP). Evidence shows that female patients are at higher risk of pain after sex non-specific surgery, thus sex- or gender-specific differences in pain treatment efficacy with potential consequences for perioperative pain management are to be expected. Considering the clinical and societal burden of poorly managed postoperative pain, the GEPard project comprises two systematic reviews, GEPard 1: sex- and/or gender-specific differences in efficacy of perioperative pain management for certain (major) surgical procedures in adult patients; and GEPard 2: sex- and/or gender-specific differences in the dosing, efficacy and adverse effects of the most common systemic perioperative non-opioid- and co-analgesics across all sex non-specific surgical procedures in adult patients.
The reviews will be conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and the Cochrane Handbook. MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Scopus, ClinicalTrials.gov and PsycINFO will be searched. We will include randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and systematic reviews/meta-analyses reporting outcomes disaggregated by sex and/or gender in adult surgical patients. For GEPard 1, this applies to selected major surgical procedures; for GEPard 2, to all non-sex-specific surgical procedures. Interventions include regional anaesthesia, systemic analgesics and psychological strategies for GEPard 1 and non-opioid- as well as co-analgesics for GEPard 2. Two reviewers will independently screen and extract the data. Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool 2.0 (RoB 2) and AMSTAR 2 tools will assess study quality. Random-effects or Bayesian meta-analyses will be performed where possible; otherwise, narrative synthesis will be applied. GRADE methodology will assess evidence certainty.
No ethical approval is required for these reviews. Findings will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publications, patient organisations and professional societies. Data will be shared via Zenodo or Open Science Framework (OSF), following FAIR principles.
The systematic review protocols for both reviews have been registered in PROSPERO on 29 August 2025 (Registration-ID: CRD420251121393 (GEPard1), CRD420251121536 (GEPard2).
This study examines the mediating roles of distress, burden and social support, as well as the moderating effect of social support, in the relationship between the risk of prolonged grief and psychopathology in bereaved family caregivers of palliative care patients.
A cross-sectional study was conducted with 125 bereaved family caregivers. Validated assessment tools and the PROCESS macro in SPSS were used for mediation and moderation analyses.
Emotional burden mediated the relationship between prolonged grief risk and psychopathology, while distress and physical burden did not. Instrumental social support was a key mediator, highlighting the protective role of practical assistance, whereas emotional social support did not show significant mediation. Both types of social support moderated the relationship, buffering the negative impact on mental health.
Findings underscore the complex interactions between bereavement risk factors and psychopathology. Addressing emotional burden and enhancing social support may help reduce mental health risks in bereaved caregivers.
Healthcare professionals in palliative care should implement targeted interventions to reduce burden and strengthen support systems for bereaved caregivers. Nursing-led initiatives focused on emotional burden reduction may mitigate psychopathology risks.
Findings are relevant for healthcare professionals in palliative care and those designing interventions for bereaved caregivers. Emotional burden mediated the relationship between prolonged grief and psychopathology, while instrumental and emotional social support moderated its effects.
This study adhered to STROBE guidelines for cross-sectional research.
Beyond caregiver participation in data collection, patients and healthcare professionals contributed to study design, protocol development and dissemination.
Nurse practitioner-sensitive outcomes (NPSOs) are critical indicators of the quality and effectiveness of nursing care provided to older adults. These outcomes, which include metrics such as falls, pressure ulcers, infection rates, frailty, delirium, length of stay, hospital readmissions, and quality of life (QoL), are essential for assessing the impact of nurse practitioners (NPs) and enhancing patient safety. Despite their importance, the current literature on NPSOs in services for older adults remains limited. This scoping review aims to address this gap by systematically mapping the existing research, identifying key themes, and uncovering areas needing further exploration. By doing so, the authors seek to provide a comprehensive overview that will inform future research directions and contribute to the enhancement of clinical practice in older person services (OPS). This review is important for healthcare providers, policymakers, and researchers who are committed to improving the quality of nursing care and outcomes for older people.
The aim of this scoping review is to map the existing research on NPSOs in services for older adults. This review seeks to identify key themes and gaps in the current literature to guide future research and enhance clinical practice in this area.
The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines were utilised to structure this scoping review.
From initial screening of 3593 manuscripts drawn from seven databases, 66 were deemed eligible for full screen. Five studies met the inclusion criteria and were ultimately selected for data extraction and analysis. The most common outcome measures reported were complications and comorbidities, and QoL.
This review highlights that the reporting of NPSOs in older person care is lacking and requires further attention.
To examine practical, ethical, and organisational implications of the use of a key technology deployed in the care of hospitalised people with dementia—visual identifiers—through a comparative analysis with parallel interventions in other spheres of healthcare and social activity.
Discursive paper.
We contrast visual identification systems used for hospitalised patients with dementia with other, ostensibly similar, systems to understand how they differ in key characteristics: what they disclose, to whom and with what intended consequence.
Certain distinctive features of the ways identifier systems are used to improve dementia care appear particularly consequential for their impact. Given how much is expected of such identifiers, they are likely to fail at least a proportion of patients.
We argue that it is important to critically evaluate the interests served by visual identifiers, identifying the dimensions of quality they can enhance and those that may be negatively impacted.
Visual identifiers for people with dementia can contribute to the ‘taskification’ of nursing care, implying that achieving person-centred care is a matter of following defined protocols rather than an emergent, relational, time-consuming process. Staff may end up prioritising risk avoidance and hospital routines (tasks that are measurable and auditable) rather than embracing the unpredictability of developing relationships with patients.
Visual identifiers are a part of well-established strategies to improve hospital care for those with cognitive impairment. While these identifiers aim to prompt healthcare professionals to deliver individually tailored care, research suggests that they are unable to consistently ensure the desirable quality of care. Understanding influences on how they are deployed can help reshape the expectations placed on such low-tech interventions and inform more reflective use.
Patients and public were not directly involved in the development of this discursive paper.
Research and evidence-based practice in nursing have a direct impact on the quality of care to patients. Its enactment in daily practice remains challenging, with nurses' insufficient research capacity and capability being one challenge, and the limited current state of knowledge another.
To map the knowledge landscape around capacity-building programmes aiming to increase evidence-based nursing practice and research activity in acutecare hospitals.
Scoping review using Joanna Briggs Institute methodology and PRISMA-ScR reporting guidelines.
Articles from 2013 to 2023 were searched on PubMed, CINAHL, Medline/OVID, Cochrane Library, PsycINFO, Scopus and Web of Science. Two researchers screened their eligibility independently. To be eligible, studies needed to focus on nursing/midwifery in acute care settings, address research capacity-building practices and be either an empirical, review or theoretical publication. Data were extracted in a structured format and synthesised narratively.
Twenty-four articles were included, consisting of 12 empirical, 6 reviews and 6 non-data-based articles. Our analysis identified two dimensions of research capacity: (1) individual research capability and (2) organisational research capacity, each influenced by various determinants. Findings suggest that four key elements are required to build a research capacity programme: (1) context assessment, (2) multilevel leadership and management engagement, (3) programme tailored to context and (4) clear outcome indicators. We found nursing research capacity programmes lacked clear definitions and a consensus on a conceptual framework.
This review systematically synthesised the knowledge landscape on nursing research capacity building programmes in acute care hospitals, bringing clarity regarding concepts, dimensions, determinants and structural key elements.
The conceptual model developed through this review encourages comprehensive and comparable research capacity-building programmes, which can accelerate enhancement of research skills, literacy, activities and evidence-based practice among nurses, thereby improving quality of care and patient outcomes.
No patient or public contribution.
To explore how practical nurses perceive telehomecare in relation to sustainability.
This study had a qualitative exploratory design.
Ten practical nurses working with telehomecare were interviewed in February–April 2024. The interviews were individual, semi-structured and were analysed through Braun and Clarke's reflexive thematic analysis.
The overarching theme of this study was ‘Telehomecare: A catalyst for a multifaceted transformation towards sustainable practices in homecare nursing’, with three main themes and seven subthemes. The three main themes were ‘Reshaped delivery of care’, ‘Reformed work environment’ and ‘Reallocated resources'. The findings reveal that nurses have multifaceted perspectives on telehomecare in relation to sustainability, recognising both its positive and negative impacts on healthcare organisations, nurses and clients while also acknowledging that more sustainable practices demand significant changes in the healthcare environment.
Telehomecare has significant impacts on multiple dimensions of sustainability within healthcare and notable drawbacks. These findings emphasise the critical need for comprehensive education and training in sustainable digital work practices to enhance healthcare professionals' awareness of environmental impacts. This underscores the importance of transformative leadership that drives organisational change towards sustainable healthcare practices and implements effective sustainability policies.
The findings present some aspects of telehomecare that contribute to a lesser environmental impact from a nursing care perspective, encouraging healthcare leaders to make conscious and effective strategic decisions towards more sustainable healthcare. The findings strengthen nurses, leaders and policymakers' knowledge and awareness of sustainable nursing activities in the digital milieu, highlighting the urgent need for transformation of healthcare practices to decrease the environmental impact.
The study followed the consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative studies (COREQ).
This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct or reporting.
Exploring the concept of patient agitation in the intensive care unit.
Patient agitation in the intensive care unit is of widespread concern and linked to negative outcomes for patients, staff, and family members. There is currently no consensus on what constitutes agitation in the intensive care context, hindering effective and tailored prevention and management.
Concept Analysis.
Walker and Avant's eight-step concept analysis approach.
A comprehensive search was carried out in the databases MEDLINE, PsychINFO and CINAHL. A total of 32 papers published between 1992 and 2023 were included, reviewed, and analysed to explore definitions, attributes, antecedents and consequences of patient agitation.
Patient agitation in the intensive care unit is characterised by excessive motor activity, emotional tension, cognitive impairment, and disruption of care, often accompanied by aggression and changes in vital signs. Antecedents encompass critical illness, pharmacological agents and other drugs, physical and emotional discomfort, patient-specific characteristics and uncaring staff behaviours. Consequences of agitation range from treatment interruptions and poor patient outcomes to the psychological impact on patients, families, and staff.
Agitation in the intensive care unit is a complex issue which significantly impacts patient treatment and clinical outcomes. For healthcare professionals, patient agitation can contribute to high workloads and job dissatisfaction. Due to the complex nature of agitation, clinicians must consider multifaceted strategies and not rely on medication alone. Further research is needed to fully understand patient agitation in the ICU. Such understanding will support the development of improved strategies for preventing and managing the behaviours.
A clearer understanding of patient agitation supports the development of tailored interventions that improve patient care, guide ICU training, and inform future research.
This concept analysis was developed with input from a patient representative.
To synthesise current evidence on the development and implementation of quality care metrics for nurses working in general practice.
A Scoping review guided by Arksey and O'Malley's framework and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR).
Articles included peer-reviewed primary research, published in English between 1989 and 2024, reporting on the development, implementation and evaluation of quality care nursing metrics in general practice settings. EndNote was used for citation management, while Covidence facilitated screening and data extraction by four reviewers. The Donabedian model of quality care assessment (2005) and the WHO tool for primary care nurse competencies (2020) were used to synthesise the findings.
A systematic search of PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE and Web of Science databases was conducted between June 2022 and June 2024. The search strategy was developed using Population, Concept and Context criteria, with keywords including ‘Nurse’, ‘General Practice’, ‘Metric’ and ‘Indicator.’
Eleven studies conducted between 2005 and 2024 met the inclusion criteria. Five studies focused on quality care indicators or measures, and six examined nurse competencies or standards of care.
Quality care metrics are underutilised in general practice. There is ambiguity in metric terminology and nursing roles, education and primary care systems. Quality care metrics must align with nursing values, with digital technology and leadership as core enablers.
Adoption of nursing metrics in general practice provides insights into nursing contributions to patient care. Standardising the definitions of nursing care metrics will enable valid and reliable comparisons.
Quality care nursing metrics will enable the nurse's role to be manifested in general practice settings in relation to patient outcomes.
PRISMA reporting guidelines have been adhered to.
Understanding of the role of the nurse in general practice will support improved quality, safety, policy and governance in general practice settings.
No patient or public contribution.
To develop and validate decision trees using conditional probabilities to identify the predictors of mortality and morbidity deterioration in trauma patients.
A quasi-experimental longitudinal study conducted at a Level 1 Trauma Center in São Paulo, Brazil.
The study analysed 201 patient records using standardised nursing documentation (NANDA International and Nursing Outcomes Classification). Decision trees were constructed using the chi-squared automatic interaction detection (CHAID) algorithm and validated through K-fold cross-validation to ensure model reliability.
Decision trees identified key predictors of survival and mobility deterioration. Patients who did not require (NOC 0414) Cardiopulmonary Status but required (NOC 0210) Transfer Performance had a 97.4% survival rate. Conversely, those requiring (NOC 0414) Cardiopulmonary Status had a 25% risk of worsening mobility, compared to 9% for those who did not. K-fold cross-validation confirmed the model's predictive accuracy, reinforcing the robustness of the decision tree approach (Value).
Decision trees demonstrated strong predictive capabilities for mobility outcomes and mortality risk, offering a structured, data-driven framework for clinical decision-making. These findings underscore the importance of early mobilisation, tailored rehabilitation interventions and assistive devices in improving patient recovery. This study is among the first to apply decision trees in this context, highlighting its novelty and potential to enhance trauma critical care practices.
This study highlights the potential of decision trees, a supervised machine learning method, in nursing practice by providing clear, evidence-based guidance for clinical decision-making. By enabling early identification of high-risk patients, decision trees facilitate timely interventions, reduce complications and support personalised rehabilitation strategies that enhance patient safety and recovery.
This research addresses the challenge of improving outcomes for critically ill and trauma patients with impaired mobility by identifying effective strategies for early mobilisation and rehabilitation. The integration of artificial intelligence-driven decision trees strengthens evidence-based nursing practice, enhances patient education and informs scalable interventions that reduce trauma-related complications. These findings have implications for healthcare providers, rehabilitation specialists and policymakers seeking to optimise trauma care and improve long-term patient outcomes.
Patients provided authorisation for the collection of their clinical data from medical records during hospitalisation.
To explore nurses' experiences with power structures in hospital care and to develop policy recommendations for transforming disempowering structures.
A three-phased critical ethnographic design.
Data were collected in a general teaching hospital in the Netherlands between December 2022 and June 2024 through (1) ethnographic diaries kept by nurses, (2) semi-structured interviews, (3) partial participant observations, (4) one focus group discussion with only nurses and (5) one multistakeholder focus group. Thematic analysis was used to identify themes.
Twenty-eight nurses of thirteen different departments and nine stakeholders participated. Four themes emerged from the analysis: (1) power in cooperation, (2) hierarchical relationships, (3) aggression and (4) insufficient decision-making power in hospital policies. The first theme was experienced as an empowering structural condition, while the last three were identified as disempowering structures.
Job satisfaction and quality of care among nurses are at risk and elicit feelings of burnout because of nurse–doctor hierarchies, aggression and insufficient decision-making power in hospital policies. Therefore, improving interprofessional cooperation and including nurses in decision-making is crucial to structurally empower nurses.
Hospital administrators need to create empowering conditions for nurses by furthering inclusion in policy making and setting department goals, implementing interprofessional education for effective collaboration, increasing nurse representation throughout hospital management layers and ensuring strong support systems. These interventions are important in addressing aggression, hierarchies, nurse turnover and burnout.
COREQ guidelines were used for reporting qualitative studies.
None.
To assess the impact of a nurse-led remote secondary cardiovascular prevention programme versus usual follow-up in patients who have suffered an acute coronary syndrome in terms of major adverse clinical events (MACE), diet, physical exercise, smoking, emotional state, adherence to medical treatment, cardiometabolic profile and anthropometric parameters within one year of discharge.
Prospective, randomised, open-label, evaluator-blinded, multicentre trial.
Between October 17, 2017, and February 5, 2023, patients were randomly assigned to either a usual follow-up of two cardiology visits over 12 months or the nurse-led remote secondary cardiovascular prevention programme, which also included 5 nursing visits (one face-to-face and four remote).
At 12 months, the nurse-led remote prevention programme group (interventional group) had lower smoking rates, greater adherence to medication, greater adherence to the Mediterranean diet, more physical activity, and better perceived health status compared to the usual follow-up group. The interventional group demonstrated a reduction in major adverse clinical events (20.7%) compared to the usual follow-up group (12.4%). This reduction was observed particularly in Acute Coronary Syndrome recurrence, all-cause hospitalisation, and hospitalisation for cardiovascular causes.
Patients randomised to the nurse-led remote prevention programme showed a significant reduction of the MACE, improved lifestyle, and medication adherence at 12 months compared to the usual follow-up group.
This study illustrates the feasibility and efficacy of a remote secondary cardiovascular prevention programme led by advanced practice nurses in patients who have suffered an Acute Coronary Syndrome.
CONSORT.
None.
The study was prospectively registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03234023
FreshRSS 