Language-concordant care, or healthcare in one’s preferred language, is important both for health equity and for improving health outcomes. Linguistic minorities, like Francophones in Ontario, Canada, are at risk of poorer clinical outcomes if they receive non-language-concordant primary care. However, common ratio-based access measures can provide misleading views of minorities’ actual access levels. This cross-sectional geospatial study demonstrates a new way to measure primary care access using average travel time to the nearest five English- and French-speaking family physicians. We also introduce the concept of primary care access fragility, where a region’s primary care access may depend on one or a few local family physicians. Our research question is: are there differences in travel burden and access fragility for census subdivisions (CSDs) across language (English/French), rurality (urban/rural) and region (north/south) in the province of Ontario, Canada?

We conducted a cross-sectional geospatial analysis to estimate English-language and French-language primary care travel burdens and access fragility in Ontario, Canada. We used population and boundary data from Statistics Canada’s 2021 census, road-network data from OpenStreetMaps, and family physician practice locations and language abilities from the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario. We measured travel burden using Valhalla, an open-source road-network analysis platform.

We conducted our analysis for Ontario, Canada’s 577 CSDs, which correspond roughly to municipalities and with populations ranging from 5 inhabitants in Rainy Lake 17B to a high of 2 794 356 in Toronto.

Using public data from January 2026, we identified 15 762 family physicians practising in Ontario, of whom 11.0% reported speaking French. Patient data were obtained from the most recent 2021 census.

Our first primary outcome measures were CSD-level mean travel time to the nearest five English-speaking family physicians, and CSD-level mean travel time to the nearest five French-speaking family physicians, which we compared to explore regional inequities in travel burden. Our secondary outcome measures were based on a novel notion of the travel burden component of ‘primary care access fragility’. This metric indicates how dependent a region’s access is on a small number of local physicians and is defined as the difference between the CSD-level mean travel time to the nearest one physician and to the nearest five physicians. As the difference in travel times grows, so too does access fragility.

Median differences in French-language and English-language travel burdens were strongly significant across rurality, regions and overall (median difference 13.4 min, p

Compared with the general public, Ontario’s French-speakers face higher travel burdens to language-concordant family physicians and higher access fragility, especially in rural and northern regions. Our results are of interest to policymakers and health-system planners, and our methods are applicable to other populations and regions.

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a leading cause of hospitalisation in infants worldwide. New immunoprophylactic products, including long-acting monoclonal antibodies and maternal vaccines, have demonstrated high efficacy in prelicensure clinical trials. Understanding how these interventions perform outside controlled trials, and how viral evolution or host factors influence protection, is essential for sustaining confidence in RSV prevention programmes.

We will conduct a 5-year, test-negative case–control study among infants ≤12 months of age who present with acute respiratory illness (ARI) within a large healthcare delivery network serving a demographically diverse population. Cases will be infants testing positive for RSV by PCR, and controls will be RSV-negative infants meeting the same ARI criteria. Data will be obtained from electronic health records, structured caregiver surveys and state immunization registries to ensure accurate classification of exposures and covariates. Vaccine effectiveness will be estimated using multivariable logistic regression controlling for potential confounding. RSV-positive specimens will undergo full-genome sequencing to identify variant lineages and potential immune-escape mutations. A subset of participants will provide acute and convalescent blood samples for single-cell immune profiling to define innate and adaptive responses associated with breakthrough infection.

The study protocol has been approved by the Yale Human Investigation Committee (HIC #2000036550). Written informed consent will be obtained from all parents or legal guardians prior to participation. Study findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, scientific meetings and public repositories, with fully de-identified participant data to protect privacy and confidentiality. Viral genomic data will be shared in accordance with the National Institutes of Health Genomic Data Sharing Policy, and analytical code will be made publicly available to ensure reproducibility.

NCT06172660.

This study was to estimate the potential social value and net benefit of OpenUp, a 24/7 text-based online counselling service for youth in Hong Kong, and draw policy-relevant conclusions for service provision.

A retrospective, model-based cost–benefit analysis using social return on investment (SROI) methods. Adopting a societal perspective, service, health and social outcomes were valued over a 1-year period, and productivity gains associated with avoided suicide deaths were valued over a 10-year period. Costs are reported in 2022 HK dollars (HK$; US$1=HK$7.8). Reporting was guided by Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards 2022 (CHEERS 2022) Statement.

A text-based, synchronous online emotional support counselling platform in Hong Kong was accessible through WhatsApp, Facebook, SMS and the official web portal.

A total of 19 543 users aged 11–35 years accessed OpenUp services during the study period (1 December 2020 to 31 May 2022).

These included total social value (HK$), net social benefit (social value minus investment) and the SROI ratio. The secondary outcomes included monetised savings in medical and social services and productivity gains from avoiding suicide attempts and death.

The total social value was estimated to be HK$226 119 729 against an investment of HK$47 655 000 (SROI=4.74). Suicide risk reduction (productivity gains from avoided attempts and deaths) accounted for 75.4% of the social value. Deterministic one-way sensitivity analyses yielded SROI values ranging from 3.62 to 6.99 aggregated across the three groups, with results being most sensitive to assumptions about the duration of productivity impacts for avoided attempts and avoidable mortality.

Based on conservative assumptions, OpenUp can generate potential social value by providing an online emotional support service. Given the study’s reliance on modelling and proxy monetisation, these estimates should be interpreted with caution. Further integration of offline services with online intervention strategies requires continuous investment and evaluation.

Diagnostic stewardship is an emerging concept, so far primarily associated with microbiology, specifically antibiotic stewardship. However, its core idea, ensuring ‘the right test at the right time for the right patient’, holds relevance across all areas of clinical medicine. By optimising the diagnostic process, diagnostic stewardship aims to enhance clinical decision-making and promote more effective, efficient and patient-centred care. Key objectives are the reduction of diagnostic errors, namely overdiagnosis, underdiagnosis and misdiagnosis, as well as optimal resource management. The aim of our review was to establish whether and how diagnostic stewardship has been implemented outside the area of antibiotic stewardship.

This scoping review will be conducted in accordance with the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) guidelines and reported using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR) checklist. Medline, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, Google Scholar and Proquest Thesis and Dissertation will be searched using a search strategy based on the population, concept, context (PCC) framework, adding an outcome variable. Studies will be screened by two independent reviewers and reported using the PRISMA flowchart. Included will be studies starting from 2015, which will describe stewardship interventions in different diagnostic modalities. Excluded will be results regarding antimicrobial stewardship. No language restriction will be applied. Information on the definition and application of the concept of diagnostic stewardship, as well as general study characteristics, will be extracted using a previously developed and piloted data extraction form. Extracted data will be analysed and reported using narrative and descriptive analysis.

Ethics approval is not required for this scoping review. Dissemination activities include peer-reviewed journal publication and conference presentations.

Stress and burnout are pervasive among physicians. Academic physicians who are female and physicians who are under-represented in medicine (URM) face inequities in the workplace and beyond. Understanding their experiences is crucial for workforce sustainability and diversity, especially given the disproportionate effects on these individuals and overall workforce capacity.

To qualitatively explore the perspectives of academic female and URM physicians and identify key themes affecting their careers and well-being.

Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 30 physicians at an urban academic health system. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed and thematically analysed using a general inductive approach. Interview guides were informed by prior literature and constructs.

None.

Female and URM physicians from a large, academic medical centre were recruited via email. Participants self-reported demographic information, including sex, race, ethnicity and tenure.

The primary outcomes encompassed the main themes identified through the analysis of interviews with female and URM physicians regarding their perspectives on well-being, mental health and academic medicine.

30 female or URM physicians were interviewed (27 (90%) female; 14 (47%) black, Asian or multi-racial). Thematic analysis revealed four key themes: physician identity (URM, female, family), well-being in the workplace (emotional health, staffing burden, non-clinical responsibilities), barriers to accessing well-being resources (workplace environment, culture, overgeneralisation) and facilitators to well-being (physician camaraderie, leadership support). Physicians discussed how their identities influenced their experiences of well-being. They highlighted emotional health challenges, staffing burdens and administrative tasks contributing to stress. Barriers to accessing resources included workplace culture and broad-based interventions, while supportive leadership and camaraderie were identified as facilitators of access.

Female and URM physicians face systemic challenges impacting their well-being and careers. These findings underscore the need to address systemic changes and specifically design programmes focused on promoting the well-being and inclusivity of female and URM physicians. Tailored interventions to these individuals, supportive leadership structures and collaborative working cultures are crucial for addressing these issues and sustaining a diverse physician workforce.

To explore how well the primary care system in Scotland works for adults with intellectual disabilities (ID), using the rate of unplanned hospital admissions for ambulatory care sensitive conditions (ACSC) as a proxy indicator. As part of this, to investigate those rates and rate ratios among adults with ID and without ID, adjusting for the prevalence of a given ACSC in each population. The secondary aim was to explore deaths due to ACSC among the ID and no-ID populations.

A population-based retrospective cohort data linkage study of adult respondents to Scotland’s 2011 Census. Self-reported or proxy-reported ID status from the Census was linked to hospital admissions data and deaths data. The cohort was followed until the end of 2019. The prevalence of ACSCs in each population was calculated from aggregate-level data published by the National Health Service, as it was not possible to use the linked dataset for this purpose.

Whole population of Scotland.

People aged 18+ on census day (27 March 2011), including all adults with ID (n=16 840) and a 15% randomly selected comparator sample of adults without ID (n=566 074).

Crude and age-sex standardised incidence rates and ratios; cumulative incidence; prevalence ratios. The exposure was ID status, and the outcomes were (1) unplanned ACSC hospital admission, (2) death with an ACSC condition listed as the main cause on the death certificate and (3) death with an ACSC condition listed as one of the causes on the death certificate.

Adults with ID under the age of 55 had only a slightly higher risk of an unplanned ACSC hospitalisation than their general population counterparts (standardised incidence ratio 1.11; 95% CI 1.03 to 1.20). After adjusting for different ACSC prevalence in ID and non-ID cohorts, this difference in risk disappeared. These findings contrast with existing evidence from England, where a much higher unadjusted risk of unplanned ACSC hospitalisations was found among people with ID. Adults with ID had a higher risk of dying due to ACSC than adults without ID (standardised mortality ratio 2.54; 95% CI 2.19 to 2.95).

Our findings on unplanned ACSC hospitalisations suggest that the primary care system in Scotland appears to be similarly effective for adults with ID than for adults without ID. However, the higher risk of dying from ACSC among people with ID suggests that this system is less effective for people with ID. Future research should investigate this tension and aim to understand why the operation of the primary healthcare system seems to be worse with regards to ACSC mortality than with regards to unplanned ACSC hospitalisations.

This community-led research study protocol emphasises placing black youth impacted by the legal system, their families and their communities at the forefront of substance use treatment development research and decision-making. The study, the Cultural Adaptation of a Substance Use Treatment (CAST) Project, challenges traditional top-down approaches to treatment creation, advocating for a grassroots model that centres community knowledge, values and active participation.

The CAST project is a US-based mixed-methods study with an exploratory design that examines the impact of racial discrimination on substance use in black youth impacted by the legal system. The study participants are black youth impacted by the legal system (N=15), parents of black youth impacted by the legal system (N=10) and community members who serve black youth (N=10) (total N=35 study participants). Study participants from each group (youth, parents and community members) will participate in three separate focus groups, respectively, to provide feedback on the culturally responsive content needed to best support black youth impacted by the legal system around substance use and mental health. The eight-step Assess, Decision, Adaptation, Production, Topical Expert, Integration, Training, Testing framework will be used as a guide to inform adaptations to the Motivational Enhancement Therapy and Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (MET/CBT12) for black youth impacted by the legal system. Once the cultural adaptation process has been completed, the study will conclude with an open feasibility and accessibility trial of the culturally adapted MET/CBT12 manual. The primary outcomes of this study are the feasibility and acceptability of the culturally adapted manual, measured by treatment attendance and participant feedback. Secondary outcomes include reductions in substance use and discrimination distress, and improvements in mental health symptoms.

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) at the University of California, San Francisco (IRB Protocol Number: 23-40126). All study procedures will be conducted in accordance with the ethical standards outlined by the institutional review board. The results from this study will be shared through peer-reviewed publications, academic conferences, community forums and policy briefs to support broader implementation of culturally adapted adolescent substance use interventions that address discrimination-related stress and substance use among black individuals impacted by the legal system.

NCT06003725.

This scoping review protocol aims to examine the role of the Internal Regulation Core (IRC) as an intra-hospital governance structure that coordinates capacity and patient flow and may function as a strategic hub for disruptive innovation in hospital management. By integrating organisational routines, rules and, when available, enabling technologies, IRCs may strengthen operational efficiency and contribute to higher-quality care delivery. As hospitals face increasing operational complexity and constrained resources, clarifying what IRCs are, how they are implemented across settings, and what innovations and impacts are reported has become a priority.

This scoping review will follow the Joanna Briggs Institute guidance and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews. A comprehensive search will be conducted across five databases (MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science and LILACS) and grey literature sources, without language or date restrictions. The searches were conducted up to 6 July 2025. Two reviewers will independently screen studies and extract data using a standardised form; disagreements will be resolved by consensus or a third reviewer. Findings will be synthesised descriptively and thematically, with results presented in tables and narrative summaries, including innovation streams.

Open Science Framework (10.17605/OSF.IO/HWZJS).

Patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) are measures of patients’ perceptions of care they receive. PREMs are critical in developing and evaluating programmes that aim to improve patient healthcare experiences and quality of care (QoC) according to patient-defined needs. This review aims to map key domains of PREMs across distinct healthcare technical areas and life stages from globally available literature.

A scoping review adapting Arksey and O’Malley’s framework and Joanna Briggs Institute’s guidelines for the conduct of scoping reviews.

Google Scholar, PubMed, WHO, US Academy of Medicine and USAID Momentum.

PREMs literature from electronic repositories of grey and peer-reviewed publications, published in English historically up to September 2023.

Two lead reviewers with support from the technical working group co-created a review framework of healthcare technical areas, life stages and PREMs domains. We screened eligible articles, prioritising reviews except for technical areas with no reviews, where we then selected individual studies. We charted, analysed and synthesised data from 52 eligible articles.

PREMs literature has recently increased, especially in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs), although studies in high-income countries (HICs) dominate in proportion (n=38; 73.1%). Out of 52 eligible articles, technical areas with most publications were sexual and reproductive health (n=21; 40.4%) and general outpatient care (n=11; 21.2%). Studies in adulthood (n=24; 46.2%) and from pregnancy and birth to postnatal (n=16; 30.8%) were most represented. PREMs studies reported mostly on communication and rapport (n=33; 63.5%) and respect and dignity (n=42; 80.8%) domains. Nearly a quarter (n=12; 23.1%) of the articles included only validated tools; the rest included a combination of validated and unvalidated measures. Of the tools relating to life stages of babies, younger children and older adults, the majority (n=17; 94.4%) included patient proxies.

PREMs, as an important component of QoC measurement, are increasing across several healthcare technical areas and life stages with commonalities and notable distinctions in measurement domains and tools. Evidence on PREMs largely comes from HICs. Evidence on critical, yet sometimes overlooked domains, highlights key QoC implementation gaps. The adaptation and utilisation of PREMs in programmes, especially in LMICs and under-represented technical areas, present opportunities to close the QoC disparities in those settings. Strategic, concerted efforts towards the harmonisation of PREMs tools across multiple life course stages and technical areas are critically needed in high-level quality improvement efforts.

Acute lower limb ischaemia (ALI) is a life- and limb-threatening vascular emergency requiring urgent intervention. Despite advancements in therapeutic strategies, outcome reporting for ALI remains inconsistent, limiting evidence synthesis and guideline development. The CORE-ALI study aims to develop a Core Outcome Set (COS) to standardise outcome reporting and ensure the inclusion of both clinical and patient-centred metrics.

CORE-ALI will use a structured, multi-phase methodology guided by the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) initiative and the Core Outcome Set-STAndards for Reporting (COS-STAR) guidelines. Phase 1 involves stakeholder engagement through semi-structured interviews with patients, clinicians and policymakers from diverse European healthcare systems. Qualitative data will be analysed using thematic analysis to generate a preliminary list of outcomes. In Phase 2, a multi-round Delphi survey (anticipated two to three rounds) will prioritise and refine outcomes through consensus building, with quantitative data analysed using descriptive and non-parametric statistical methods. Phase 3 will culminate in a consensus meeting to finalise the COS. Multilingual accommodations will ensure inclusivity, and General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)-compliant platforms will secure data handling.

The study has received ethics approval from the Ethics Committee of the Medical University of Innsbruck (EK Nr: 1082/2025) on 20/05/2025. Additional local ethics approvals are required and will be obtained at all participating sites prior to the initiation of recruitment. The final Core outcome set will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, presentations at international conferences and engagement with professional societies and patient organisations.

COMET initiative (Registration No. 3346).

Emergency departments (EDs) have a crucial role in suicide prevention. Around 18% of people who died by suicide presented to ED in the month prior to death, commonly for self-harm.1 A hospital presentation for self-harm is one of the strongest risk factors for suicide;...

To identify the assessments, diagnostic criteria and outcome measures reported in peer-reviewed literature for children with growing pains and persistent lower limb pain in the presence of restless leg syndrome (RLS).

Scoping review completed in line with Joanna Briggs Institute methodological guidance

Five online databases were searched—MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO and AMED—for records up to 14 October 2024.

Records reporting on the use of assessments, diagnostic criteria or outcome measures in children (aged 0–18 years) with growing pains or persistent lower limb pain in the presence of RLS. Articles were required to have a sample size of ≥10 and be available in English language.

Data were extracted by two independent reviewers and analysed using descriptive statistics.

Following review of 19 806 records, 61 unique records were included. Most were observational cross-sectional or case–control designs. Assessments were varied and primarily focused on body functions and pain characteristics rather than activities and participation. There were 15 unique diagnostic criteria reported for growing pains with limited consistency and sometimes conflict between included items. Outcomes measures were only reported in eight records and typically measured pain presence and intensity.

Assessment and subsequent diagnosis of growing pains and persistent pain in the presence of RLS lack consistency. Outcome measures were seldom used as most records were not designed to measure change over time. Standardised practices for assessment and management of these conditions may benefit clinicians and optimise patient care.

Process evaluation provides insight into how interventions are delivered across varying contexts and why interventions work in some contexts and not in others. This manuscript outlines the protocol for a process evaluation embedded in a hybrid type 1 effectiveness-implementation randomised clinical trial of incremental-start haemodialysis (HD) versus conventional HD delivered to patients starting chronic dialysis (the TwoPlus Study). The trial will simultaneously assess the effectiveness of incremental-start HD in real-world settings and the implementation strategies needed to successfully integrate this intervention into routine practice. This manuscript describes the rationale and methods used to capture how incremental-start HD is implemented across settings and the factors influencing its implementation success or failure within this trial.

We will use the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) and the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation and Maintenance (RE-AIM) frameworks to inform process evaluation. Mixed methods include surveys conducted with treating providers (physicians) and dialysis personnel (nurses and dialysis administrators); semi-structured interviews with patient participants, caregivers of patient participants, treating providers (physicians and advanced practice practitioners), dialysis personnel (nurses, dieticians and social workers); and focus group meetings with study investigators and stakeholder partners. Data will be collected on the following implementation determinants: (a) organisational readiness to change, intervention acceptability and appropriateness; (b) inner setting characteristics underlying barriers and facilitators to the adoption of HD intervention at the enrollment centres; (c) external factors that mediate implementation; (d) adoption; (e) reach; (f) fidelity, to assess adherence to serial timed urine collection and HD treatment schedule; and (g) sustainability, to assess barriers and facilitators to maintaining intervention. Qualitative and quantitative data will be analysed iteratively and triangulated following a convergent parallel and pragmatic approach. Mixed methods analysis will use qualitative data to lend insight to quantitative findings. Process evaluation is important to understand factors influencing trial outcomes and identify potential contextual barriers and facilitators for the potential implementation of incremental-start HD into usual workflows in varied outpatient dialysis clinics and clinical practices. The process evaluation will help interpret and contextualise the trial clinical outcomes’ findings.

The study protocol was approved by the Wake Forest University School of Medicine Institutional Review Board (IRB). Findings from this study will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals and scientific conferences.

NCT05828823.

Military personnel are a unique population with heightened vulnerability to sexually transmitted infections (STIs), often exhibiting higher prevalence rates than civilians due to demographic, environmental and occupational factors. These vulnerabilities underscore the need for global prevalence estimates to guide effective, evidence-based interventions. This study aims to quantify the global burden of STIs among military personnel, providing a comprehensive and up-to-date assessment.

This systematic review will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Guidelines (2020). Using the CoCoPop (Condition, Context, and Population) framework, a comprehensive search strategy will be conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, Global Health and Scopus to retrieve peer-reviewed records published between January 2010 and June 2025. Eligible studies will report numerical STI prevalence data among military personnel. Studies with insufficient information to calculate prevalence or those relying on self-reported STI data will be excluded. Data extraction will include study details, military descriptors, STI prevalence and diagnostic methods. Risk of bias will be assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical assessment tool for prevalence and incidence studies. Prevalence estimates with 95% CIs will be reported for each STI and, where appropriate, pooled for curable STIs. Subgroup analyses will stratify prevalence by geographic region, service status, deployment status and socioeconomic factors. Heterogeneity will be evaluated within predefined subgroups using the I² statistic. Data will be presented in comprehensive tables and visualised with graphical tools, including forest plots for subgroup analyses and pooled estimates.

Ethical approval is not required for this review. The results will be disseminated through a peer-reviewed publication and conference presentations.

CRD42023472113.

Deaths related to drug overdose and suicide in the USA have increased 500% and 35%, respectively, over the last two decades. The human and economic costs to society associated with these ‘deaths of despair’ are immense. Great efforts and substantial investments have been made in treatment and prevention, yet these efforts have not abated these increasing trajectories of deaths over time. The COVID-19 pandemic has exacerbated and highlighted these problems. Notably, some geographical areas (eg, Appalachia, farmland) and some communities (eg, low-income persons, ‘essential workers’, minoritised populations) have been disproportionately affected. Risk factors have been identified for substance use and suicide deaths: forms of adversity, neglect, opportunity indexes and trauma. Yet, the biological, psychological and social mechanisms driving risk are not uniform. Notably, most people exposed to risk factors do not become symptomatic and could broadly be considered resilient. Achieving a better understanding of biological, psychological and social mechanisms underlying both pathology and resilience will be crucial for improving approaches for prevention and treatment and creating precision medicine approaches for more efficient and effective treatment.

The State of Ohio Adversity and Resilience (SOAR) study is a prospective, longitudinal, multimodal, integrated familial study designed to identify biological, psychological and social risk and resilience factors and processes leading to mental health disorders, substance use disorders, substance overdose, suicide and associated psychological/medical comorbidities which reduce life expectancy and quality of life. It includes two nested longitudinal samples: (1) WD Survey: an address-based random population epidemiological sample of 15 000 individuals (unique households) representative of the state of Ohio assessed for psychosocial, psychiatric, behavioural health and substance use factors and (2) Brain Health Study: a family-based, multimodal, deep-phenotyping study conducted in 1200 families (up to 3600 persons aged 12–72 years) including MRI, electroencephalography, blood biomarkers and psychiatric diagnostic interviews, as well as neuropsychological, psychosocial functioning and family/community history, dynamics and support assessments. SOAR is designed to discover, develop and deploy advanced predictive analytics and interventions to transform mental health prevention, diagnosis, treatment and recovery.

All participants will provide written informed consent (or parental permission and assent for minors). The study was approved by The Ohio State University Institutional Review Board (study numbers 2023H0316 (Brain Health) and 2023H0350 (Wellness Survey). The Brain Health study was also approved by institutional review boards at each partnering institution involved in conducting participant assessments. Findings will be disseminated to academic peers, clinicians and healthcare consumers, policymakers and the general public, using local and international academic channels (academic journals, evidence briefs and conferences) and outreach (workshops and seminars).

TransformUs is a multicomponent school-based programme that offers teachers professional learning and resources aligned with the Australian curriculum to promote physically active teaching and learning, a supportive environment and physical activity opportunities during recess and lunch. The programme was originally developed for students in mainstream primary schools and has been proven efficacious for increasing physical activity and reducing sedentary behaviour in children without disability. The programme has been adapted for delivery with students with disabilities in primary and secondary schools (TransformUs All Abilities). This project aims to determine the implementation at scale and effectiveness of the TransformUs All Abilities programme to increase physical activity among primary and secondary school children and adolescents with disability. This protocol describes the hybrid implementation-effectiveness trial that will be used for this evaluation.

This study employs a hybrid type II implementation-effectiveness trial to evaluate the TransformUs All Abilities programme, targeting all government and independent, primary and secondary schools in Victoria, as well as special and mainstream secondary schools in Queensland and South Australia (n=2173 eligible schools). The effectiveness trial will focus on a subgroup of government/independent special schools for students with mild to moderate intellectual disability in Victoria, involving up to three intervention and three waitlist control schools (n=61 eligible schools). In both trials, outcomes will be guided by the RE-AIM framework focusing on reach, adoption and implementation (implementation trial) and effectiveness (effectiveness trial), with data collected at baseline and 6 months. The effectiveness trial will focus on students’ device-measured physical activity and sedentary behaviour—primary outcomes—and sleep, physical literacy and cognitive functions—secondary outcomes. Teacher feedback on the programme’s adaptation and their experience with programme implementation will also be collected, alongside qualitative feedback from a subsample of students regarding engagement/enjoyment and suggestions for improvements. Implementation data will be analysed descriptively and using linear mixed models to test changes over time. Effectiveness outcomes will be analysed using linear mixed models to compare intervention and waitlist control, accounting for confounding and school/classroom clustering. Interview data will be thematically analysed.

Ethical approval for this trial was obtained from the Deakin University Human Research Ethics Committee (2021-368). Clearance to conduct research in schools was also obtained from the Education Departments of Victoria (2023-004726), Queensland (550/27/2592) and South Australia (2022-0020). Informed consent is required for participation in the study. School staff can enrol in the implementation trial via the TransformUs website, while the effectiveness trial requires organisational, staff, parental/carer consent and student assent. Results will be disseminated through academic publications, scientific conference presentations and summary reports to schools, parents and partner organisations.

ACTRN12622001082796; Universal Trial Number: U1111-1281-1103; ACTRN12622001050741: U1111-1280-8828.

The 2019 Lancet Commission report introduced the concept of a ‘syndemic’, emphasising the complex interplay between malnutrition, obesity and climate change. This updated systematic review aimed to synthesise evidence after 2019 on climate change and childhood obesity.

Systematic literature review using Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.

Four English databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus and CINAHL) and four Chinese databases (China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang, CQVIP and SinoMed), covering publications from 1 January 2019 to 20 August 2024.

We included studies examining the impact of climate-related and weather-related exposures on obesity-related outcomes among children aged 2–12 years; quantitative and qualitative studies exploring their interrelationships.

Two independent reviewers used standardised methods to search, screen and code included studies. Risk of bias (RoB) was assessed using the RoB Rating Tool for Human and Animal Studies. Findings were summarised and synthesised with key characteristics, including sociodemographic factors, exposure indicators, metrics of obesity, analytic methods, covariates, key associations and limitations.

Of the 3007 records, 16 studies met the inclusion criteria. The findings suggest that climate-related factors, including natural disasters, rainy and wet seasons, longer daylight hours, extreme cold and rising temperatures, may be associated with increased risks of childhood overweight and obesity. However, the results remain inconsistent, varying across genders and locations.

The review highlights the complex relationships between climate change and childhood obesity. Further research is needed to better understand the mechanisms and inform the development of climate adaptation strategies to reduce childhood obesity.

CRD42024560247.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is characterised by progressive airflow limitation that is not fully reversible and is associated with an abnormal inflammatory response of lungs to noxious particles and gases. The inflammatory and reparative processes occurring in the lungs induce a ‘spill-over’ of inflammatory mediators into the circulation, resulting in an increase in systemic inflammation, which is further increased during acute exacerbations of COPD (AECOPD), leading to the development of extra-pulmonary comorbidities, such as cognitive impairment. Cognitive impairment affects up to 61% of people living with COPD. Heightened levels of inflammation have been linked to increased risk of cognitive impairments; however, the exact mechanisms remain unclear, thus hampering the development of therapeutics. This study aims to determine whether patients hospitalised with an acute COPD exacerbation show impaired cognitive function compared with recovery (~day 45), and whether such dysfunction is associated with systemic inflammation and oxidative stress.

A prospective, observational study will be conducted at Austin Health in Victoria, Australia. Eligible participants will be assessed during admission for AECOPD and following stabilisation (approximately day 45). The primary outcome is the difference in cognitive function between admission for AECOPD to recovery using non-verbal cognitive tests. Secondary outcomes are changes in systemic markers of inflammation, oxidative stress and ACE2 catalytic activity. Tertiary outcomes are anxiety and depression scores.

Ethical approval has been granted in Australia by Austin Health Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC 56099) with governance approval at Austin Hospital. The results will be published in peer-reviewed scientific journals and presented at national and international scientific conferences. Findings will be disseminated to consumers in publications for lay audiences.

The aim of this study was to prioritise a set of indicators to measure World Health Organization (WHO) quality-of-care standards for small and/or sick newborns (SSNB) in health facilities. The hypothesis is that monitoring prioritised indicators can support accountability mechanisms, assess and drive progress, and compare performance in quality-of-care (QoC) at subnational levels.

Prospective, iterative, deductive, stepwise process to prioritise a list of QoC indicators organised around the WHO Standards for improving the QoC for small and sick newborns in health facilities. A technical working group (TWG) used an iterative four-step deductive process: (1) articulation of conceptual framework and method for indicator development; (2) comprehensive review of existing global SSNB-relevant indicators; (3) development of indicator selection criteria; and (4) selection of indicators through consultations with a wide range of stakeholders at country, regional and global levels.

The indicators are prioritised for inpatient newborn care (typically called level 2 and 3 care) in high mortality/morbidity settings, where most preventable poor neonatal outcomes occur.

The TWG included 24 technical experts and leaders in SSNB QoC programming selected by WHO. Global perspectives were synthesised from an online survey of 172 respondents who represented different countries and levels of the health system, and a wide range of perspectives, including ministries of health, research institutions, technical and implementing partners, health workers and independent experts.

The 30 prioritised SSNB QoC indicators include 27 with metadata and 3 requiring further development; together, they cover all eight standard domains of the WHO quality framework. Among the established indicators, 10 were adopted from existing indicators and 17 adapted. The list contains a balance of indicators measuring inputs (n=6), processes (n=12) and outcome/impact (n=9).

The prioritised SSNB QoC indicators can be used at health facility, subnational and national levels, depending on the maturity of a country’s health information system. Their use in implementation, research and evaluation across diverse contexts has the potential to help drive action to improve quality of SSNB care. WHO and others could use this list for further prioritisation of a core set.