Conectar
Ample evidence has shown the benefit of high-fidelity simulation (HFS) in promoting learning in pre-licensure nursing students, but the evidence for practising registered nurses has not been synthesised.
To evaluate the effects of HFS training on learning outcomes and satisfaction in practising registered nurses.
In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched PubMed, CINAHL, ERIC, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) for studies published in English or Chinese from database inception to 31 May 2023 (updated on 20 April 2025). All randomised controlled trials (RCT) or quasi-experiments that compared HFS training with traditional methods (e.g., lecture) for practising registered nurses and reported learning outcomes and satisfaction were included. Risk of bias was assessed by the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomised trials (RoB 2) and non-randomised trials (ROBINS-I). Inverse-variance random-effect models were used to calculate standardised mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence interval (CI). We followed the PRISMA 2020 guideline.
Of 1404 records, eight eligible studies (five RCTs and three quasi-experiments) involving 275 practising nurses were identified. Two RCTs had high risk of bias, while others showed some concerns or moderate risk of bias. Meta-analyses showed that HFS could promote knowledge acquisition (SMD = 0.65, 95% CI, [0.35, 0.95], p < 0.01, I2 = 0%), professional skills (SMD = 0.72, 95% CI, [0.41, 1.04], p < 0.01, I2 = 0%) and learning satisfaction (SMD = 1.24, 95% CI, [0.35, 2.13], p < 0.01; I2 = 67%), compared with traditional methods. The pooled effect on self-confidence was marginally insignificant (SMD = 0.59, 95% CI, [−0.04, 1.22], p = 0.07; I2 = 67%).
Compared with traditional training methods, HFS is effective in promoting knowledge acquisition, professional skills and learning satisfaction and may enhance self-confidence among practising nurses. To strengthen the evidence base, more rigorous RCTs with larger sample sizes, adequate reporting of HFS design, and standardised outcome measures are warranted.
PROSPERO (CRD42022358717). No Patient or Public Contribution.
This retrospective cohort study evaluated the relationship between patient falls, Morse Fall Scale (MFS) items, patient demographics, length of stay and hospital site.
Data were acquired from 72 hospitals in a health system. Logistic regression models were conducted including MFS items, demographics, length of stay, and interaction terms. The final mixed effects logistic regression model included significant patient-level covariates as fixed effects and hospital site as a random effect.
6531 of 978,920 total admissions included a patient fall. Four MFS items (fall history, secondary diagnosis, gait weak/impaired, mental status—overestimates/forgets limitations) and three demographic items (male gender, increased age, longer length of stay) were associated with increased likelihood of falling. Two MFS items (ambulatory aids, intravenous therapy/lock) and Hispanic ethnicity were associated with decreased risk of falling. An interaction effect was present between male gender and mental status. Males who overestimate/forget limitations had 3.16 times higher odds of falling than females oriented to their own ability. The proportion of variance in falls between hospitals was 0.23 and the median odds ratio (MOR) 1.57.
This study uniquely assessed fall risk at the level of the patient and hospital, using data from nearly 1 million admissions at 72 hospitals. Controlling for patient characteristics, results demonstrate variability in fall risk among hospitals. Research informing hospital differences as well as gender and racial/ethnic differences in falls is needed to identify appropriate interventions.
As hospitals increasingly adopt risk-directed fall prevention, assessment tools should be re-evaluated for clinical utility and corresponding prevention practices. The MFS may be enhanced by removing intravenous lock as a risk and screening for additional risks such as medications and medical equipment. Quality improvement efforts must also consider the hospital's environment and processes that may further contribute to fall risk.
Authors adhered to STROBE guidelines for reporting.
No Patient or Public Contribution.
To explore community dwelling adults' lived experiences of participating in death café in Singapore.
A descriptive phenomenological study with Photovoice.
A purposive sample of community dwelling adults who participated in a community-based death café was recruited for this study. Data was collected through online individual semi-structured interviews. The Colaizzi's six-step descriptive phenomenological analysis was conducted for data analysis.
Twenty community dwelling adults who participated in a death café were recruited. Participants' experiences of the death café were expounded in four themes: appeals of attending death cafés, enabling features of death café, engaging in die-logues, and perceived impacts of death café on everyday lives. The participants were attracted to death cafés for various reasons including curiosity and grief. A comfortable environment, accompanied by open dialogues and refreshments, was credited as enablers for death conversations. Through these ‘die-logues’, the participants had a deeper understanding of death and began engaging in advance planning.
Death cafés provide a supportive environment for individuals to engage in death-related conversations that may not easily occur in daily life. By engaging in conversations about mortality within death cafés, participants are encouraged to take proactive steps towards advance planning.
Findings from this study can guide the development of community-based interventions by highlighting the essential components required for a death café tailored to the Asian context.
This study describes the community dwelling adults' lived experiences of participating in a death café. The findings from this study underscore the role of informal conversations about death as a tool to promote population health based palliative care initiatives such as overcoming death taboos and stimulating advance care planning among community dwelling adults.
The Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Studies was used.
Community-dwelling adults participated in the interviews.
Managing patients' mental state deterioration in acute hospital settings is a critical challenge, requiring prompt specialised intervention to mitigate adverse outcomes. Current responses vary widely across health systems. Integrating rapid response systems that incorporate mental health expertise offers a promising approach to reduce risks and adverse outcomes.
To evaluate how a response system manages patient mental state deterioration in acute hospital settings, focusing on the mechanisms driving system effectiveness, for whom it works and under what circumstances, using a realist-informed theory-testing approach with field observation.
We conducted non-participant field observations in one trauma and one surgical unit over 4 months to examine the contexts, mechanisms and outcomes shaping a mental state deterioration response system. Observations captured multidisciplinary interactions, escalation processes and decision-making. Structured field notes were thematically coded using a realist framework to refine program theories and identify key factors influencing timely intervention.
Twenty responses were observed, most in the trauma unit. The system worked best when bedside nurses escalated early signs of deterioration, prompting timely intervention. Multidisciplinary collaboration involving nurse unit managers, liaison psychiatry, doctors and allied health professionals activated mechanisms of integrated assessment and coordinated care, enabling both medical and mental health needs to be addressed. Competing medical acuity demands at times reduced system availability. Teleconferencing supported specialist input when in-person attendance was not possible, ensuring person-centred care.
System functioning depended on early risk communication by bedside nurses and proactive multidisciplinary collaboration. Organisational support and staff training are essential to address operational challenges. Findings provide evidence for strengthening response systems to deliver timely, comprehensive interventions that improve physical and mental health outcomes.
DIvERT (De-escalation, Intervention, Early, Response, Team) is a proactive rapid response model of care piloted to improve the management and outcomes of patients experiencing mental state deterioration in acute hospital settings. The model achieves this through structured escalation pathways, proactive interventions and coordinated multidisciplinary collaboration to integrate medical and mental health care. Strengthening organisational support and staff training further reduces reliance on restrictive practices and promotes safer, person-centred care.
What problem did the study address? Acute hospitals face persistent challenges in responding to patient mental state deterioration alongside medical acuity, with existing rapid response systems often insufficiently integrated with mental health expertise. What were the main findings? Field observations of the DIvERT model demonstrated that proactive integration of mental health expertise, supported by organisational investment in training, clear escalation protocols and multidisciplinary collaboration, enabled earlier intervention and more coordinated responses. Where and on whom will the research have an impact? These findings have implications for acute hospital services, informing system-level improvements to rapid response models that support patient safety, reduce adverse events and improve staff wellbeing.
This study adhered to the relevant EQUATOR guidelines. Specifically, reporting followed the RAMESES II (Realist And Meta-narrative Evidence Syntheses: Evolving Standards II) reporting standards, which provide criteria for transparent and rigorous reporting of realist evaluation methodology.
No patient or public contribution.
To describe the lived decision-making experiences of parents during the first 6 months after their children's new cancer diagnoses.
Descriptive phenomenological study.
This study was conducted from 2022 to 2023 at an academic teaching hospital in Taiwan. Parents of children newly diagnosed with cancer within the previous 6 months were recruited using purposive sampling. Data were collected via in-depth interviews with 18 participants and subsequently analysed using the Giorgi method.
Three major themes emerged: (1) making decisions without choices, with the subthemes of parallel universes and realities and overwhelming information and unanswered questions; (2) deferring decisions to expert judgements, with the subthemes of trust in professionals, working together, and seeing the future; and (c) balancing quality of life and survival, with the subthemes of confronting and suffering, mental preparation and worry, and being a strong supporter and carrying burdens. Hope for their children's survival sustained parents, empowering them to become steadfast sources of strength and support. Through hope, they transitioned from feeling helpless to actively advocating and assuming the primary caregiver role.
After deciding to proceed with their children's cancer treatment, hope for survival becomes the strongest factor motivating parents to navigate, explore, and move forward in an environment filled with uncertainty. Psychological preparation and understanding ease parental anxiety.
The development of clear, structured care plans is recommended to help parents feel supported and transition early from novices to confident guides.
The findings of this study highlight the shift in parents' roles following children's cancer diagnoses from facing unavoidable decision-making to actively striving to balance children's quality of life with treatment outcomes. They provide guidance for the support of parents' engagement with decision-making plans in clinical practice.
Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research.
None.
To assess the prevalence of malnutrition risk, especially of undernutrition, among patients admitted to the Internal Medicine and Orthopaedics wards at Michele and Pietro Ferrero Hospital, Italy, using the Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS-2002) tool, administered by trained nursing staff, and to evaluate the adherence to related care interventions.
Cross-sectional study.
We included 248 adult patients, screened by trained nurses for nutritional risk within 48 h of admission using the NRS-2002 tool, which takes into account patients' Body Mass Index, recent weight loss, reduced dietary intake, and disease severity. Information on nursing interventions was also collected.
We identified 36 subjects at risk of malnutrition with NRS ≥ 3. Prevalence was higher in Internal Medicine, reflecting differences in patient characteristics and clinical complexity. Patients at risk were older, had longer hospital stays, and higher risks of falls and pressure sores. Nursing interventions such as proper meal selection, administration of hypercaloric-hyperproteic supplements, and completion of food diary were implemented in most cases, although adherence was not complete. Post-training questionnaire showed that, overall, nurses integrated nutritional screening into practice, but areas for improvement were identified.
Results confirmed the high prevalence of malnutrition risk in hospitalised patients, especially in Internal Medicine. Proper training and empowerment can enable nurses to effectively identify and manage patients at intermediate risk of malnutrition.
Nurses can play key roles in hospital nutritional care by facilitating early identification and appropriate management of patients at malnutrition risk.
Malnutrition is very common among inpatients. Trained and empowered nurses can perform nutritional screening at admission to identify and early manage patients at risk, thereby helping to prevent increased morbidity, mortality and healthcare costs.
STROBE guidelines.
None.
To explore the relationship between nurses' decision-making styles and missed care across different stages of the nursing process (assessment and evaluation, planning, implementation) in oncology care settings.
A cross-sectional study was conducted among oncology nurses from three hospitals using convenience sampling. Data were collected through a sociodemographic questionnaire, the Oncology Missed Nursing Care Self-Rating Scale (OMNCS) and the General Decision-Making Style Scale (GDMS). Mann–Whitney U tests and binary logistic regression were employed to analyse the associations between different decision-making styles and missed care.
Missed care was commonly reported across all dimensions, with the highest prevalence observed in the planning stage. The rational decision-making style was dominant, with significantly higher scores in the non-omission group. It was negatively associated with missed care during the implementation stage (OR = 0.460, 95% CI 0.251–0.844; p = 0.012). The intuitive-impulsive decision-making style showed a protective effect in all dimensions (OR = 0.254–0.337, 95% CI 0.128–0.501, 0.172–0.661; p < 0.01). In contrast, the dependent and avoidant styles both significantly increased the risk of missed care during the assessment and evaluation stage.
Nurses' decision-making styles play a crucial role in the occurrence of missed care, with different styles exerting varying influences across stages of the nursing process. Therefore, nursing managers should recognise the role of these styles in nursing quality and tailor interventions to support nurses with dependent or avoidant decision-making styles. Moreover, using simulated training or decision support systems to transition between rational and intuitive approaches offers a promising strategy to reduce stage-specific missed care, enhance oncology nursing quality and improve patient safety.
Identifying high-risk stages for missed care, incorporating assessments of nurses' decision-making styles and implementing personalised interventions provide a new management pathway to reduce missed care and enhance patient safety.
What problem did the study address?: This study provides new evidence that nurses' decision-making styles are significantly associated with missed care, with this relationship varying across different stages of the nursing process. What were the main findings?: The rational style was the most common decision-making style among oncology nurses, with the non-omission group scoring significantly higher than the omission group. The intuitive-impulsive style consistently showed a protective effect across all stages. In contrast, both dependent and avoidant styles increased the risk of missed care during the assessment and evaluation stage. Where and on whom will the research have an impact?: This study informs the development of targeted interventions for nursing management. Immediate priorities include implementing structured tools and training during high-risk care stages, while long-term strategies should focus on simulation-based training and fostering a supportive culture to enhance decision-making skills and reduce missed care.
The STROBE checklist.
This is a cross-sectional study to investigate the relationship between nurses' decision-making styles and missed care at specific stages of the nursing process. In the design phase, the research team collected data on oncology nurses' general information, missed care status and decision-making styles by reviewing relevant literature. During the research process, the nurses participated in data collection, providing key primary data for the study. This cooperation ensured the smooth execution of the research and contributed to obtaining effective results.
To analyse the comfort needs of patients following renal transplantation, guided by Kolcaba's Theory of Comfort.
A qualitative design was employed.
This study was conducted at a Brazilian university hospital's renal transplant outpatient clinic. Forty-six post-transplant patients were purposively sampled by age, transplant time and clinic attendance. Face-to-face interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed and conducted using a semi-structured script. Data were analysed through thematic content analysis, guided by Kolcaba's Comfort Theory and relevant literature.
Participant narratives were categorised according to the contexts outlined by Kolcaba's Theory of Comfort: Physical, Environmental, Sociocultural and Psychospiritual. In the physical context, pain was identified as a major factor diminishing comfort after renal transplantation. In the environmental context, elements such as light, odour, sound, temperature and uncomfortable furnishings contributed to discomfort. In the sociocultural context, family support was highlighted as essential. In the psychospiritual context, religiosity played a key role in enhancing the comfort of transplant recipients.
Spirituality, strengthened social support networks and non-pharmacological comfort measures are essential for promoting comfort among patients following renal transplantation. These findings underscore the importance of integrated care approaches that address physical, emotional and social aspects to improve quality of life for this population.
Conceptual models in nursing provide a critical perspective for care and support the delivery of effective, evidence-based interventions. By identifying the multidimensional comfort needs of post-renal transplant patients, this study informs the development of targeted, holistic strategies for nursing and multidisciplinary practice in outpatient settings.
This study examined the multidimensional comfort needs of post-renal transplant patients and found that comfort is shaped by physical, environmental, sociocultural and psychospiritual factors. The results may guide global nursing and multidisciplinary outpatient care by informing integrated approaches that enhance the quality of life of transplant recipients.
This study was reported according to the COREQ framework.
No patient or public contribution.
FreshRSS 