Tuberculosis is the leading cause of death globally from a single infectious agent. Early diagnosis is critical to reducing morbimortality. In cases of negative smear microscopy or limited sputum production, bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) samples offer an alternative for diagnosis. Culture, the gold standard, requires a high bacterial load, extensive infrastructure and is time-consuming. Xpert MTB/RIF provides faster results with a higher cost. Previous systematic reviews present substantial limitations, including significant heterogeneity. Therefore, the diagnostic utility of Xpert MTB/RIF using BAL samples in adults with negative or scant sputum for pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) needs to be reassessed.

A systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase, LILACS and Web of Science will be conducted without language or publication date restriction. Cross-sectional diagnostic studies of negative or sputum-scarce adults with presumptive PTB who underwent bronchoscopy to obtain samples for Xpert MTB/RIF and culture will be included. Screening and data extraction will be performed independently. Methodological quality will be assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool. A bivariate hierarchical random-effects model will synthesise sensitivity and specificity. Meta-analysis will be performed using Meta-DiSc 2.0. Heterogeneity will be assessed using I² and Cochrane thresholds. Subgroup analyses will be performed based on study design, population differences, country, culture method and risk of bias. Publication bias will be investigated using a funnel plot. The certainty of evidence will be evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. There was no patient or public involvement in the development of the systematic review protocol.

Ethical approval is not required as this study will use publicly available data. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publication.

CRD42025639440.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) affects approximately 480 million individuals globally and is projected to reach 600 million by 2050, representing a substantial burden on healthcare systems and patient quality of life. Pulmonary rehabilitation is a cornerstone intervention for COPD management, delivering clinically meaningful improvements in exercise capacity, health-related quality of life and dyspnoea. Despite strong guideline recommendations and established efficacy, only 2%–4% of eligible patients with COPD access traditional centre-based pulmonary rehabilitation due to geographical barriers, transportation difficulties, scheduling conflicts and limited healthcare resources. Digital health technologies offer promising alternatives to overcome these access barriers while potentially maintaining therapeutic benefits. Various digital delivery models have emerged, including video-based telerehabilitation, virtual reality platforms, mobile health applications and web-based programmes. However, their comparative effectiveness remains unclear, limiting evidence-based clinical decision making. This systematic review and network meta-analysis will aim to compare and rank the effectiveness and safety of different digital health delivery models for pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with COPD, providing evidence to inform optimal intervention selection in clinical practice.

We will conduct a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Network Meta-Analyses guidelines. Comprehensive searches will be performed across five electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, CINAHL) from inception to January 2026, without language restrictions. Eligible studies will include randomised controlled trials comparing digital health delivery models for pulmonary rehabilitation in adults with COPD. Digital health interventions will be categorised into four distinct delivery models: video-based telerehabilitation, virtual reality rehabilitation, mobile health rehabilitation and web-based platform rehabilitation. Interventions combining multiple modalities will be categorised according to the predominant component based on intervention frequency, duration and primary therapeutic mechanism. Two independent reviewers will perform study selection, data extraction and risk of bias assessment using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool. The primary outcome will be change in 6 min walk distance. Key secondary outcomes will include disease-specific quality of life measures, dyspnoea severity, hospitalisation rates, exacerbation frequency, intervention adherence and adverse events. A Bayesian random-effects network meta-analysis will be conducted, calculating mean differences or ORs with 95% credible intervals. Treatment rankings will be estimated using surface under the cumulative ranking curve probabilities. Evidence certainty will be assessed using the Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis framework. Planned subgroup analyses will explore potential effect modifiers including disease severity, intervention duration, supervision mode and technological features.

As this systematic review will use data from previously published studies, formal ethical approval is not required. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publication, presentations at relevant scientific conferences and communication to healthcare providers, policymakers and patient advocacy organisations.

CRD420251268701.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionised cancer treatment through targeted disruption of the physiological pathways that maintain tissue tolerance, but which are co-opted by cancers to evade immunosurveillance. Thus, the resultant T-cell activity often causes immune-related adverse events including immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced inflammatory arthritis (ICI-IA). ICI-IA results in functional impairment that frequently persists, even after ICI discontinuation, with substantial quality-of-life impacts for cancer survivors.

A high-quality body of evidence to guide ICI-IA management remains an unmet need. Pharmacological treatment may be prolonged, typically begins with non-specific immunosuppression, including systemic steroids, and is usually only rationalised to more targeted therapy in resistant cases. Moreover, retrospective data suggest the high dose glucocorticoids sometimes used in new-onset ICI-IA may be associated with worse cancer outcomes.

Tumour necrosis factor (TNF) inhibition strategies are well established with excellent efficacy and safety profiles in ‘spontaneous’ inflammatory arthritides including rheumatoid and psoriatic arthritis. Mechanistic evidence from ex vivo and murine studies also supports the utility of anti-TNF therapy for steroid-refractory cases of ICI-IA. Although good clinical responses have been reported in this setting, the REACT trial (REmission induction of Arthritis caused by Cancer ImmunoTherapy) aims to provide randomised and robust clinical evidence for deploying targeted therapy earlier in ICI-IA management. It will test whether up-front anti-TNF therapy can more effectively and quickly control symptoms, reduce glucocorticoid exposure, prevent early ICI discontinuation and increase the frequency of drug-free ICI-IA remission.

REACT is a prospective, multicentre, open-label, superiority, two-arm, randomised controlled clinical trial to guide initial therapy for patients with ICI-IA. The trial will compare the current standard of care (initial prednisolone; Arm A) with the anti-TNF drug, adalimumab without glucocorticoids (Arm B).

The primary outcome is glucocorticoid-free arthritis remission rate at 24 weeks where remission is defined as: (i) No use of systemic or intra-articular glucocorticoids (except when used for adrenal insufficiency) within 4 weeks prior to assessment at 24 weeks; and (ii) absence of synovitis on clinical examination.

The protocol was approved by East Midlands—Leicester South Research Ethics Committee on 31-Oct-2024 (Ref: 24/EM/0202). Participants are required to provide written informed consent. The results of this trial will be disseminated through national and international presentations and peer-reviewed publications.

ISRCTN18217497.

Among the five hepatitis viruses, the hepatitis B virus (HBV) is a major cause of serious acute and chronic liver infections worldwide. The major public health impact of HBV infection arises from chronic liver disease, including cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma, which predominantly affects young and middle-aged adults of both sexes. Therefore, preventive interventions focusing on mothers and infants are critical due to vertical and early childhood transmission dynamics.

HBV prevalence largely varies among pregnant women in Ethiopia because of multiple interrelated factors. This umbrella review will consolidate all existing systematic reviews and create a more reliable picture of HBV infection and its determinants among pregnant women in Ethiopia.

This umbrella review will be conducted according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses reporting standards. The review will focus on identifying and integrating evidence from eligible systematic reviews and meta-analyses, with methodological quality appraised using the MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews instrument. A comprehensive literature search strategy will be developed using relevant Medical Subject Headings alongside free-text keywords. Electronic searches will be conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE, African Journals Online, Web of Science, Scopus and Google Scholar. Statistical heterogeneity among the included reviews will be quantified using the I² statistic. Data management and meta-analytic procedures will be performed using STATA version 17, and effect estimates will be presented with corresponding 95% CIs to determine statistical precision.

This review uses only published or publicly available data, so ethics approval is not required. Findings will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations and shared with policymakers, healthcare partners, clinicians and patients to inform policy, enhance education and guide future research.

PROSPERO (CRD420251118982).

Despite the minimally invasive nature of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS), moderate-to-severe postoperative pain remains frequent and impairs recovery. Intravenous lidocaine possesses multimodal analgesic, antihyperalgesic and anti-inflammatory properties that may improve pain control and functional outcomes, but robust evidence in thoracic surgery is lacking. Moreover, its potential to attenuate neuropathic pain, a key component of chronic post-thoracic pain syndromes, has not been adequately investigated. This trial will determine whether continuous perioperative intravenous lidocaine infusion improves recovery, reduces acute pain intensity and prevents the development of neuropathic pain after VATS.

This single-centre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial will enrol 84 adult patients undergoing elective VATS. Participants will be randomised (1:1) to receive either intravenous lidocaine (bolus 1 mg/kg at induction followed by continuous infusion at 1.5 mg/kg/hour intraoperatively and postoperatively for 24 hours) or matched normal saline postoperatively, with identical intraoperative management in both groups. The primary outcome is the incidence of moderate-to-severe movement-evoked pain at 24 hours postoperatively. Secondary outcomes include pain at 48 and 72 hours, opioid consumption, pulmonary complications, sleep quality, quality of recovery, neurocognitive outcomes and chronic neuropathic pain at 3 months. Analyses will follow the intention-to-treat principle.

The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Tongji Hospital (Reference No. TJ-IRB202509102) and registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2500111163). Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants. Results will be submitted to peer-reviewed journals and academic conferences.

ChiCTR2500111163.

Indian immigrants experience significant dietary acculturation post-migration, shifting from traditional diets to more westernised eating patterns influenced by socioeconomic and environmental factors. This transition, often marked by increased processed food consumption and reduced intake of traditional staples, contributes to elevated risks of obesity and type 2 diabetes. Despite the growing Indian diaspora in Australia, Canada, New Zealand and the UK, the evidence on their dietary acculturation remains limited.

This review will adopt the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology for scoping reviews. A three-step search strategy will be applied across databases including MEDLINE (via PubMed), CINAHL, Scopus and Web of Science. Google Scholar will be used as a supplementary search tool to identify additional relevant studies. The search will include peer-reviewed studies and grey literature published in English between 1 January 2000 and 22 May 2025. First-generation Indian immigrants of all ages will be included, while second-generation immigrants, refugee populations and studies linked to non-communicable disease interventions will be excluded. Screening will be conducted in Covidence by two independent reviewers, with discrepancies resolved by a third reviewer. Data will be extracted using a standard JBI tool, charted in tabular form, and synthesised narratively and thematically.

As this review will use published and publicly available data, formal ethics approval is not required. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publication, conference presentations and community engagement.

Parental psychological challenges and poor well-being are key factors in shaping both the quality of parent-child interactions and child development. Specifically, maternal psychological distress is a central determinant of child development. Elevated levels of distress in mothers are associated with poorer child cognitive, behavioural and social-emotional outcomes, with effects persisting into adolescence and adulthood. While this highlights the critical importance of early prevention and intervention efforts to support parents, postpartum mental healthcare remains limited, despite ongoing and evident needs.

This protocol outlines a 2-year longitudinal follow-up study investigating the impact of a secondary perinatal programme (ie, Toi, Moi, Bébé), completed by mothers during pregnancy, and its impact on children’s cognitive and social-emotional functioning at 24 and 48 months. Further, the study aims to explore whether maternal self-efficacy and emotion regulation may serve as potential mediators or moderators of the relationship between programme participation and child development outcomes. The research aims to leverage the Toi, Moi, Bébé programme, by recruiting mother-child dyads (n=250) in which the mothers participated in the programme during pregnancy. Mothers were randomly assigned to complete the parenting well-being intervention either independently or with added telephone support. Participants who consent will be invited to take part in a two-wave follow-up at 24 months (T1) and 48 months postpartum (T2). At both time points, mothers will complete demographic questionnaires and standardised measures assessing maternal well-being (Generalised Anxiety Disorder-7, Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale and Perceived Stress Scale), child cognitive functioning (Ages and Stages Questionnaire-3 and MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventory), child social-emotional functioning (Ages and Stages Questionnaire, Social Emotional—second Edition-2 and Child Behaviour Checklist for Ages 1.5–5), maternal emotion regulation (Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire) and maternal self-efficacy (Parental Cognitions and Conduct Towards the Infant Scale & Me as a Parent Scale). Parents’ perceptions of their parenting experience will be measured using the Parental Reflective Functioning Questionnaire. Mother-child interaction, parenting quality and cognitive stimulation in the home environment will be measured using a brief virtual interview (StimQ₂-Toddler) and a naturalistic observation assessment (Parenting Interactions with Children: Checklist of Observations Linked to Outcomes). Using RStudio, linear mixed models will be used to assess the impact of the intervention (online intervention only vs only with telephone support) on child cognitive and social-emotional development at T1 and T2. In parallel, separate models will be conducted to examine associations between maternal emotion regulation and self-efficacy on the child development outcomes at the same timepoints. Exploratory analyses will be conducted to examine potential moderating effects of child sex and group assignment on the associations between maternal emotion regulation and self-efficacy and child developmental (cognitive and socioemotional) outcomes, using causal inference models.

The current study has been registered, reviewed and approved (MP-37-2025-10894) by the Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre Research Ethics Board. Findings from this research will be disseminated through peer-reviewed open access publications, and presentations at national and international conferences.

NCT05110456.

To explore the impact of multiple long-term conditions (MTLCs) and a comorbid mental health condition on decision-making processes, attendance and engagement in NHS community-based therapy groups.

Qualitative in-depth interviews analysed using reflexive codebook analysis as part of a study within a trial.

Secondary community mental health teams from two UK sites.

Purposive sample of 20 participants recruited to a randomised controlled trial of group therapies (arts therapies and counselling) holding a mental health diagnosis and self-reported as having at least one additional physical health condition.

Six themes were constructed: (1) MLTCs influenced arts modality choices and goals; (2) importance of planning ahead to be organised; (3) the journey loomed over participants; (4) the impact of MLTCs on group attendance and participation; (5) the group was valued and important; (6) determination and fighting to get what I need.

Decisions about arts modalities and group attendance were based on a self-perceived level of felt capability. It was important for participants to plan in advance and feel informed ahead of making commitments, enabling them to prepare and manage symptoms. Travelling to the groups was dreaded, and many participants required support with travel in order to attend. Managing symptoms during the journey and groups was challenging; however, participants had a strong determination to uphold the commitment to attend despite their difficulties, as the group was highly valued.

MLTCs have a large impact on people’s capacity to engage in community groups, requiring additional planning and effort. The scale of this impact is often not recognised. Despite this, the benefits of groups for people with MLTCs are especially important, including motivation to leave the house, opportunities for socialisation and a means of reaching one’s own goals. Clinicians are recommended to accommodate the needs of MLTCs when designing community group interventions and consider multiple attendees with MLTCs in the group composition to improve attendance and group engagement.

ISRCTN88805048.

To assess the impact of a National Enhanced Service (NES) incentive for weight management that financially rewarded practices for each eligible patient referred to a weight management programme.

Interrupted time-series analysis to examine the rate of weight management referral and weight management advice.

Primary healthcare records from January 2018 to December 2024 in the Oxford Clinical Informatics Digital Hub, covering 8.3 million patients in 1198 primary care clinics around England.

NES payments to practices for weight management were introduced in April 2021.

The rate of referral increased from 1 referral per 1000 patients per month before the incentive to around 4 referrals per 1000 patients per month afterwards. There was no evidence that the increase differed by age, gender, ethnic group or socioeconomic status. The occurrence of weight management advice was unchanged by the introduction of the NES and was at least three times more common than referral to weight management services.

The NES was associated with a fourfold increase in referrals to weight management services. However, clinicians are much more likely to offer advice rather than a referral to a weight management programme. There is a clear opportunity to improve outcomes for patients by encouraging greater use of referrals to effective weight management services in place of advice.

To investigate associations between body composition indices and metabolic status among normal-weight adults.

Cross-sectional study using data from the Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study (phaseVII: 2019–2021).

Primary care and community health services in an urban Tehran population.

1298 adults (40.5% men, 59.5% women), aged 18–80years, body mass index (BMI) 18.5–24.9 kg/m². Exclusions: known diabetes, cardiovascular disease, kidney failure, malignancy, pregnancy or lactation, diuretic or glucocorticoid use. Participants were classified as metabolically healthy normal weight (MHNW) or unhealthy (MUHNW).

The primary outcome was the association between body composition and anthropometric indices with metabolic status. The secondary outcome was identification of the strongest predictors of MUHNW. Body composition was assessed by bioelectrical impedance analysis to obtain fat mass (FM), body fat percentage (BFP), skeletal muscle mass percentage (SMM%), fat mass index (FMI), fat-free mass index, skeletal muscle indices and the fat-to-muscle mass ratio (FMR). Anthropometric measures included waist circumference (WC) and waist-to-hip ratio (WHR). Associations were examined using logistic regression adjusted for age, smoking and physical activity.

Mean age: 37.5±12.8 y; MUHNW participants were older than MHNW (44.5±13.2 vs 35.8±12.1 years, p

BMI, WC, WHR and body fat indices were positively associated with metabolically unhealthy status among normal-weight adults of both sexes. WHR was the strongest predictor, highlighting its value for identifying at-risk individuals where advanced body composition tools are unavailable.

Cycling can be beneficial for health, well-being and the environment; however, cycling participation in the UK remains low. Effective and cost-effective strategies are needed to support people in the community to increase cycling. The Cycle Nation Communities randomised controlled trial (RCT) will evaluate whether a 9 week multi-component cycling programme (Cycle Nation) is more effective and cost-effective than an existing national cycle training session on cycling participation, transport use and health and well-being.

This pragmatic, single-blinded, two-arm RCT will recruit ≥268 adults who cycle infrequently. Participants will be randomised to the 9 week multi-component individual/social-level group-based Cycle Nation programme or an existing national standard single group-based cycle training session. Both arms will be delivered by community-based cycling organisations in Glasgow. Participants will complete self-reported measurements at baseline, 12 weeks and 12 months. The primary outcome is the proportion of participants cycling at least weekly at 12 months. Secondary outcomes include proportion of participants cycling at least weekly at 12 weeks; change in weekly number of rides and minutes of cycling and use of private car, taxi, public transport and walking at 12 weeks and 12 months; change in motivation, perceptions of cycling safety, confidence to cycle, self-esteem, vitality, health-related quality of life and perceived general physical health at 12 weeks and 12 months. A within-trial economic evaluation from a National Health Service/personal social service and a broader societal perspective will be undertaken. Pending within-trial results, a long-term model may be developed. An embedded process evaluation will use participant and facilitator interviews, participant acceptability questionnaires, facilitator delivery proforma and session observations.

Ethical approval has been obtained from the University of Glasgow Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences Ethics Committee (11 April 25). Findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals and communicated to stakeholders and the public.

NCT07005674.

To determine the prevalence of potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP), potentially inappropriate medication (PIM), potential prescription omission (PPO), potentially harmful drug–drug interactions (PDDI) and identify associated factors among older Ethiopians.

Systematic review and meta-analysis

We searched PubMed, HINARI, Scopus and Web of Science databases to identify eligible studies published up to 31 October 2025.

Observational studies reported the prevalence of PIP, PIM, PPO and PDDI among older adults from any healthcare settings were screened.

Two independent reviewers selected studies, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias. The quality and risk of bias of the studies were assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale and Hoy risk of bias tool, respectively, while the certainty of evidence of outcomes was assessed using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation based on Cochrane recommendations. We used a random-effects model for analyses to estimate the pooled prevalence and associated factors. All data analyses were done using Stata V.17 software.

The national prevalence of PIP, PIM, PPO and PDDI was estimated as main outcomes. Variations were estimated based on regions, age groups, outcome evaluation tool, disease type and healthcare setting.

The review included 25 studies (n=5662 participants) for PIP or PIM, 14 studies (n=2706 participants) for PDDI and 6 studies (n=1342 participants) for PPO. The pooled prevalence estimate was 41% (95% CI 33% to 48%), I²=96.87% for PIP, 37% (95% CI 31% to 44%), I²=96.33% for PIM, 55% (95% CI 36% to 73%), I²=99.00% for PDDI and 14% (95% CI 6% to 24%), I²=95.07% for PPO. The majority of the studies have very good quality (very good=13, good=1, satisfactory=11 for PIP and PIM; very good=11, satisfactory=3 for PDDI; very good=6 for PPO) and low risk of bias (low risk=18, moderate risk=7 for PIP and PIM; low risk=12, moderate risk=2 for PDDI and low risk=6 for PPO), while all studies for each outcome have low certainty of evidence. Subgroup analyses revealed significant regional and contextual variations. Polypharmacy was significantly associated with PIP (OR=3.72, 95% CI 2.53 to 5.46, p2=69.56%), PIM (OR=4.20, 95% CI 2.91 to 6.06, p2=57.83%) and PDDI (OR=4.51, 95% CI 3.05 to 6.69, p2=0.00%), while hypertension (OR=2.46, 95% CI 1.38 to 4.36, p2=0.00%) was associated with PIP.

This review found a high prevalence of PIP, PIM, PDDI and PPO among older adults in Ethiopia, with notable heterogeneity across regions. Polypharmacy was associated with PIP, PIM and PDDI, while hypertension showed association with PIP. Despite generally good study quality, the certainty of evidence was low for the included studies due to the cross-sectional design nature, with high heterogeneity. Therefore, these findings should be interpreted cautiously. This study indicates a high burden of inappropriate medication prescribing and its associated factors, underscoring the importance of further robust studies to clarify prescribing practices and associated factors.

CRD42024556744.

Incidental pulmonary nodules (IPNs) are commonly encountered on chest radiographs (CXRs) performed for routine clinical indications and may represent early manifestations of significant pulmonary pathology, including lung cancer. While low-dose CT screening has mortality benefits in selected high-risk populations, its implementation remains limited in many healthcare settings. Artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted CXR interpretation has the potential to enhance pulmonary nodule detection. However, evidence from Malaysian clinical practice is scarce. This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic performance of AI-assisted CXR interpretation for detecting IPNs across healthcare facilities in the Klang Valley, Malaysia.

This prospective, multicentre study will include 2452 CXRs from patients aged ≥35 years over a 6-month period across four Klang Valley healthcare facilities. Each CXR will be independently interpreted by an experienced radiologist (>5 years of experience) and analysed separately using an AI system (qXR-LNMS). An independent thoracic radiologist will determine the final classification for analysis if there is IPN detection discordance. Diagnostic performance metrics (sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and overall accuracy) will be calculated using a 2x2 classification matrix. Agreement between AI-assisted interpretation and radiologist reports will be assessed using Cohen’s kappa statistic. The prevalence of IPNs detected by AI-assisted interpretation and radiologist reporting will be compared using a two-proportion z-test. AI discriminative performance will be evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis and area under the curve estimation. Statistical analyses will be conducted using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences V.29, with p

Ethical approval has been obtained from the Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Research Ethics Committee and the Ministry of Health Malaysia Medical Research and Ethics Committee. Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants. The findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, scientific conferences and engagement with relevant stakeholders.

This study intended to investigate barriers to implementing evidence-based intrapartum care during vaginal births, from maternity care providers’ point of view.

A descriptive qualitative study was conducted using in-depth interviews, with data analysed through thematic analysis.

The labour room of a major tertiary care hospital in Central Sri Lanka.

Purposively selected 17 maternity care providers including doctors, nurse managers, nurse-midwives and midwives.

Three major themes and twelve sub-themes were generated: (1) barriers related to care providers (lack of human resources, negative attitudes of care providers, poor relationship among care providers, poor relationship between women and care providers, lack of knowledge on evidence-based practice in childbirth care); (2) barriers related to organisational environment (gaps in management, heavy workload, inadequate physical resources, insufficient in-service training and lack of availability/use of updated guidelines) and (3) barriers related to women’s birth preparedness (women’s limited knowledge on childbirth and intrapartum practices and women’s limited engagement during labour and childbirth). Many maternity care providers perceived that prevailing challenges to implement evidence-based childbirth care were one of the major reasons that impacted the quality of current childbirth care in the labour room.

The findings showed that an integrative approach may be essential to address the diverse barriers to the implementation of evidence-based intrapartum care. It is necessary to engage healthcare administrators, healthcare professionals and care recipients to enhance the quality of current childbirth care in the setting through the successful implementation of evidence-based care.

There are approximately 700 000 autistic people in the UK, and autism is increasingly being diagnosed in adulthood. Diagnosis on its own does not provide adequate information to plan post-diagnostic support for autistic people, and clinicians often plan support without the use of validated standardised tools which may exacerbate inequities in care. This study will evaluate a novel strengths and needs assessment, based on the WHO’s International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health CoreSet for Autism, for use in adult diagnostic services immediately on receipt of an autism diagnosis. Potential issues, including the length of the assessment, timing of delivery and selection bias, will be explored as part of the trial process evaluation.

A two-arm, multisite, randomised pilot trial design will be used to evaluate the ICF CoreSets for Autism Strengths and Needs Assessment in three diagnostic services in England. A total of 72 newly diagnosed autistic adults will be recruited across the three sites over a 6-month period and randomised into an assessment group (strengths and needs assessment plus standard care) and a treatment as usual group (standard care only). The assessment group will receive a summary report of their strengths and needs on completion of the assessment. Both groups will complete measures of mental health and quality of life at baseline and 3 months follow-up (Patient Health Questionnaire-9, Generalised Anxiety Disorder questionnaire-7, Recovering Quality of Life questionnaire-10, EuroQoL-5D). Acceptability and feasibility will be measured for the strengths and needs assessment and for trial procedures using standardised measures, progression criteria and qualitative data from clinician focus groups and interviews with a subsample of autistic participants. The study design and procedures are being co-produced with an autistic advisor/patient and public involvement lead and with a steering group of autistic adults.

This study was reviewed by the East Midlands—Nottingham 2 Research Ethics Committee and was given Health Research Authority approval on 18 March 2025 (REC reference:25/EM/0041). The results will be disseminated via reports to the funder (NIHR), a peer-reviewed journal paper and academic conferences. We will email a summary report of findings to study participants and will invite participants to an information dissemination event at the end of the study. Links to reports and a lay summary will be provided on the research group’s website: https://sharl.sites.sheffield.ac.uk/home

ISRCTN10283350.

Some people with HIV (PWH) experience brain changes that affect neurocognition, but little is known about how HIV impacts social cognition or related brain regions. Social cognition, the ability to perceive, understand and respond to social information, is important for maintaining relationships and quality of life. This article provides the protocol for the first comprehensive study examining social brain function in PWH and people without HIV (PWoH). With three aims, this study will: (1) examine neural circuits related to social cognition; (2) examine social cognitive performance across two social cognitive domains and (3) examine the role of social cognition in everyday social functioning.

Referred to as Social Brain Health Study in HIV Study, this cross-sectional study will enrol 105 PWH and 105 demographically matched PWoH aged 18–65 years. The study administers a comprehensive assessment battery across two visits within a 2-week period. Visit 1 includes behavioural measures of social cognition (Perceiving Social Cues and Understanding Others), neurocognition and social functioning (social network size and loneliness). Visit 2 involves functional MRI procedures with three social cognitive tasks designed to activate key brain regions (ie, fusiform face area, superior temporal gyrus, temporo-parietal junction, dorsal medial prefrontal cortex).

This study was funded by the National Institute of Mental Health (MH139613) and approved by the Institutional Review Board of the University of Alabama at Birmingham (IRB-300013394). Data collection is ongoing. The first results are expected to be submitted for publication in 2030. Findings of this study will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at local, national and international conferences as well as patient organisations such as AIDS service organisations and community talks.

Knee osteoarthritis (OA) causes pain, reduced function and disability and may require total knee replacement (TKR). Although TKR is effective, up to 20% of patients remain dissatisfied, partly due to poor preoperative function and unrealistic expectations. Long waiting times for surgery may worsen patients’ function, yet preoperative physiotherapy is rarely offered. Prehabilitation—exercise and education before surgery—could improve postoperative recovery, but current evidence is limited. This trial investigates whether adding prehabilitation to standard care before TKR improves postoperative patient-reported joint awareness, enablement and knee function.

This multicentre, randomised controlled parallel-group trial is planned to be conducted within two specialised orthopaedic outpatient rehabilitation units in the southeast healthcare region of Sweden. Eligible patients (40–85 years, awaiting unilateral TKR) are randomised 1:1, stratified by age (≤67, >67 years), to either 8 weeks of prehabilitation—comprising two times per week supervised exercise therapy (strength, range of motion and balance) and education—in addition to standard care, or to standard care alone. Standard care consists of self-care, a single standardised preoperative education session and standardised postoperative rehabilitation. Assessments are conducted at baseline, post-intervention, 1 week pre-surgery and 6, 12 and 52 weeks post-surgery. A total of 110 patients will be recruited to the trial. Primary outcomes are joint awareness (Forgotten Joint Score-12) and patient enablement (modified Patient Enablement Instrument-2). Secondary outcomes are patient satisfaction (5-category Likert scale), the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, the EuroQol 5 Dimension 3 Level questionnaire, the International Physical Activity Questionnaire—short form, objective function and accelerometer-based physical activity. Analyses will follow intention-to-treat and per-protocol principles. Between-group and within-group differences will be tested using t-tests or non-parametric equivalents, and linear mixed models or generalised linear models. Multiple linear regression and logistic regression will be used to analyse predictor variables for the primary outcomes. Sensitivity analyses will be performed to quantify the magnitude of missing data from patients lost to follow-up.

The trial has received ethical approval from the Swedish Ethical Review Authority (reg. no.2023-05120-01) and complies with the Declaration of Helsinki. Signed informed consent is collected for all patients before entering the trial. Results will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at international/national conferences. The findings may improve future clinical guidelines and care pathways for patients undergoing TKR.

NCT06290336.

Forced migrants (i.e., asylum seekers and refugees) experience greater mental health disparities and inequities in care. Mental health services and systems lack clear policy on integrated mental healthcare. Understanding the causal mechanisms of integrated mental health for migrants can promote a resilient and adaptive health and social care system. However, to achieve a functional mental health service integration, there is a need to understand how and why mental health system integration works and under what health systems conditions. The purpose of this realist review protocol will be to outline a process for refining an initial programme theory (IPT), developed through deliberative dialogues with key interest groups in British Columbia, Canada, and to test the IPT against the global evidence base.

A realist review is an interpretive methodological approach to synthesising the literature based on the realist philosophy of science. Realist reviews are pragmatic approaches to theory development because they involve the participation of real-world actors or people who work within complex systems. Realist reviews are particularly useful for synthesising complex knowledge. We plan to conduct a seven-step review process, with iteration between each step. Steps 1–3 have already been completed in our previous work and included the development of an IPT, which will be refined systematically by exploring the global literature and consulting with an international advisory group. These will be used iteratively to identify, test and refine the programme theory. The quality of included literature will be appraised using the relevance, richness and rigour criteria and the realist quality appraisal tool, TAPUPASM (transparency, accessibility, propriety, utility, purposiveness, accuracy, specificity and modified objectivity). Steps 4–7 will include data extraction and realist analysis through retroductive theorising using the ICAMO (intervention, context, actor, mechanism and outcome) heuristic to help distinguish actors and resources from contexts, mechanisms and outcomes.

Ethics approval for the deliberative dialogue interviews that inform this realist review and IPT were obtained by the University of British Columbia (ref: REB Number: H22-03195). Study recruitment occurred between 21 November 2023 and 16 January 2024. All participants provided informed consent to take part in deliberative dialogues and to have their interviews audio recorded and transcribed for the purpose of this research. We will disseminate results of the review through academic papers, conference presentations and through iterative interest group workshops and discussions.

CRD42024580083.

Postoperative pain is common after surgery, with a high incidence and risk of becoming chronic. Current multimodal analgesia has drawbacks, including limited efficacy from single agents and opioid side effects and addiction risk. These issues have led to opioid-sparing multimodal analgesia. Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) is non-invasive and convenient. Studies have shown it can reduce postoperative pain, improve mood and lower adverse events. However, taVNS lacks a comprehensive evaluation and standardised protocols, so further research is needed to provide reliable evidence.

This study strictly adheres to the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols. To identify suitable randomised controlled trials (RCTs), eight credible databases will be searched, including four English databases (Web of Science, PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, EMBASE) and four Chinese databases (China National Knowledge Infrastructure, VIP Database for Chinese Technical Periodicals, Wanfang Database, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database). RevMan V.5.3 will be employed to integrate the retrieved data and conduct meta-analyses. The methodological quality of included RCTs will be evaluated using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment 2.0 tool. Additionally, the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation system will be applied to assess the strength and certainty of the evidence. We will also conduct publication bias analyses, sensitivity analyses and subgroup analyses.

No ethical review is required as no private or confidential patient data will be included. Results of this study will be disseminated through a peer-reviewed journal.

CRD420251207651.

Since the 1970s, telemedicine has transformed significantly, becoming a critical component of modern healthcare delivery. Over time, technological innovation has increasingly emphasised the integration of the human body with digital systems to develop non-invasive methods for monitoring physiological parameters. Among these technologies, wearable sensors demonstrate substantial potential for continuous patient monitoring. These devices can facilitate real-time data collection, enable more rapid clinical decision-making and promote active patient participation in health management. Such capabilities are particularly valuable in emergency contexts, including prehospital care provided by ambulance services and telephone triage systems. Despite the growing interest in wearable health technologies, their integration into emergency medical services (EMS) remains insufficiently explored and warrants further investigation. We aim to map current research, explore the use of wearables in EMS settings and identify gaps in knowledge regarding their use in EMS.

This scoping review will follow the Joanna Briggs Institute’s (JBI) methodology for scoping reviews. A systematic search of relevant databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, ProQuest and Web of Science) will be conducted, from inception to March 2026. All types of study designs, including quantitative and qualitative studies, will be considered in this scoping review. The inclusion is limited to studies published in English. Two independent reviewers (RA and AA) will conduct a thorough screening of titles and abstracts against the predefined inclusion criteria. Studies that meet the inclusion criteria will be reviewed in full text. Quality and risk of bias will be assessed using the JBI’s critical appraisal tools for the relevant study types. The findings will be presented using diagrams or tables, supplemented by narrative summaries following the JBI guidelines.

Ethical approval is not required. The findings of this study will be disseminated via publication in a peer-reviewed journal.

Open Science Framework (10.17605/OSF.IO/MUEFX).