FreshRSS

🔒
❌ Acerca de FreshRSS
Hay nuevos artículos disponibles. Pincha para refrescar la página.
AnteayerTus fuentes RSS

Re‐Engaging in Activities of Daily Living After Critical Illness: A Qualitative Review

ABSTRACT

Aim

To explore the qualitative literature regarding the experiences of survivors of critical illness re-engaging in activities of daily living.

Design

Qualitative systematic review.

Methods

Databases were searched with three broad categories of search terms: (1) critical illness, (2) activities of daily living, and (3) participant experiences. Articles were included if they reported qualitative data on the experiences of adults who were re-engaging with activities of daily living after admission to an intensive care unit. The findings from these studies were thematically analysed.

Data Sources

A search of Medline, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO and AMED was conducted on the 9th September 2024.

Results

After removing duplicates, the literature search identified 6267 articles. The full texts of 120 articles were reviewed, and 44 were included for data extraction. Thematic analysis identified three themes: (1) loss of autonomy, (2) striving to reclaim independence, and (3) shifting familial dynamics and imposing a burden.

Conclusion

Survivors of critical illness face significant challenges when re-engaging with daily activities. The effort to regain autonomy often leads to feelings of helplessness and a reluctance to engage in both daily tasks and social activities. The emotional burden of dependence and the perception of being a burden further complicate their recovery.

Implications for the Profession

Health services should focus on integrating physical rehabilitation, mealtime support, and cognitive and psychological therapy to effectively cater to the diverse needs of critical illness survivors and their families.

Impact

This review highlights the complex challenges of re-engaging in activities of daily living after critical illness and emphasises the need for multidisciplinary rehabilitation to improve physical, cognitive, and emotional recovery.

Reporting Method

Reporting of this review followed the ENTREQ checklist, in accordance with EQUATOR guidelines.

Patient or Public Contribution

No Patient or Public Contribution.

Artificial intelligence to improve the detection and risk stratification of acute pulmonary embolism (AID-PE): protocol for a pragmatic quasi-experimental comparator study

Por: Gunning · S. G. S. · Page · J. · Rossdale · J. · Charters · P. F. P. · Hudson · B. · Lyen · S. · Mackenzie Ross · R. · Seatter · A. · Bartlett · J. W. · Austin · L. · Myring · G. · McLeod · H. · Mitchell · P. · Stimpson · D. · Cookson · A. · Suntharalingam · J. · Rodrigues · J. C. L.
Introduction

Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a potentially fatal condition requiring timely diagnosis and treatment. CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) is the gold standard for diagnosis and indicates PE severity through radiological markers of right heart strain. However, accurate interpretation and communication of these findings is often suboptimal in real-world practice. Artificial intelligence (AI) could alleviate pressure on radiology services by supporting PE identification, risk stratification and worklist prioritisation. Before widespread adoption, AI tools must be rigorously validated for diagnostic accuracy, safety and clinical impact.

Methods and analysis

This pragmatic single-centre, non-randomised quasi-experimental study will evaluate the diagnostic accuracy, feasibility, and clinical-cost impact of AI-assisted PE detection and risk stratification using AIDOC and IMBIO software. We will recruit two consecutive cohorts of adult patients undergoing CTPAs for suspected PE: a comparator cohort (12 months pre-AI implementation) and an intervention cohort (12 months post-AI implementation). AI will be applied retrospectively to the comparator cohort, while in the intervention cohort, radiologists will have contemporaneous access to the AI’s interpretation of CTPA images.

A subset of retrospective scans, both PE-positive and PE-negative, will undergo expert thoracic radiologist review to establish a reference standard. Data on patient demographics, clinical management and outcomes will be collected. Clinical management pathways and patient outcomes will be compared between cohorts to assess AI’s influence on acute PE management. Health economic modelling will assess the cost-effectiveness of integrating AI technology within the diagnostic workflow of acute PE.

Ethics and dissemination

This study was approved by the UK Healthcare Research authority (IRAS 311735, 10 May 2023). Ethical approval was granted by West of Scotland Research Ethics Service (23/WS/0067, 3 May 2023). Results will be shared with stakeholders, presented at national and international conferences, and published in open-access peer-reviewed journals.

Trial registration number

NCT06093217.

Connecting families--randomised controlled trial of poverty screening and financial support navigation for families of young children in primary care: an internal pilot study informed protocol

Por: Bayoumi · I. · Parkin · P. C. · Tabassum · F. · Johnson · C. · Sherwood · M. · Mitchell · M. · Birken · C. S. · Bloch · G. · Carsley · S. · Cole · M. · Green · M. · Keown-Stoneman · C. D. G. · Maguire · J. L. · Purkey · E. · van den Heuvel · M. · Weir · S. · Wong · P. · Borkhoff · C. M.
Introduction

Poverty can have profound negative impacts on parent, child and family health. Primary care providers are in a unique position to address child poverty. Some team-based models have integrated community support workers (CSWs) for social service system navigation assistance. The overall aim of this study is to rigorously test a poverty reduction intervention (navigation of financial supports) embedded in primary care. The primary objective is to compare parenting stress between CSW-supported, structured review of financial supports and social system navigation (intervention) and receipt of written summary of local resources (usual care).

Methods and analysis

This is a multisite pragmatic superiority randomised controlled trial with a 1:1 allocation to the CSW-supported social system navigation versus no navigation. Parent–child dyads (80 parents of children aged Do you ever have difficulty making ends meet at the end of the month?’) will be recruited during a scheduled health supervision visit from primary care practices in Kingston, Ontario. Intervention group participants will have a structured review of financial supports with a trained CSW and will meet up to 6 times over 6 months. Outcomes are measured at baseline, 6 months and 12 months after randomisation. The primary outcome is the Parenting Stress Index Fourth Edition Short Form (PSI-4-SF) total score at 6 months. Secondary outcomes include household income, food insecurity, parent mental health (depression and anxiety) and child health. An internal pilot study was used to obtain more reliable estimates of the SD of PSI-4-SF at 6 months to recalculate the sample size (if needed) and assess randomisation and completion rates. Qualitative interviews conducted 9 months after enrolment explore parent experiences with the CSW intervention.

Ethics and dissemination

Research ethics approval by Queen’s University Health Sciences REB. Results will be shared with the College of Family Physicians of Canada, the Ontario SPOR SUPPORT Unit and academic forums.

Trial registration number

Connecting Families (Registered 12 October 2021 at www.clinicaltrials.gov; NCT05091957).

Azithromycin use in labour to prevent sepsis among pregnant women undergoing vaginal delivery in Nigeria (AZIN-V): a study protocol for a hybrid type 2 effectiveness-implementation trial

Por: Afolabi · B. B. · Makwe · C. C. · Oluwole · E. O. · Obi-Jeff · C. · Mitchell · E. J. · Banke-Thomas · A. · Adeyemo · T. A. · Abioye · A. I. · Eboreime · E. A. · Saidu · A. D. · Okoro · U. A. · Akintan · P. · Osuagwu · C. S. · Chieme · C. F. · Lawanson · T. · Hossain · A. · Walker · K.
Introduction

Nigeria has the highest number of maternal deaths globally, and maternal peripartum sepsis is one of the leading causes of maternal mortality. A single oral dose of azithromycin (AZM; 2 g) is safe and effectively reduces 33%–60% of maternal sepsis during planned vaginal birth in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). However, the clinical and cost-effectiveness of oral AZM during vaginal birth in Nigeria remains unknown in the context of poor antimicrobial stewardship practices, significant antimicrobial resistance and healthcare financing. Evidence is also lacking on the standard care for the prevention of maternal sepsis among pregnant women undergoing vaginal births in Nigeria. The AZIN-V trial is a hybrid type 2 effectiveness-implementation trial to determine the safety, clinical and cost-effectiveness of intrapartum oral AZM versus usual care in the prevention of peripartum maternal sepsis. The trial will also examine the impact of implementation strategies in enhancing adherence to the oral AZM protocol during planned vaginal births and identify effective strategies to improve adherence (fidelity) to the protocol in real-world LMIC settings.

Methods and analysis

This is a multicentre hybrid type 2 trial conducted in six Nigerian states: Ebonyi, Edo, Gombe, Kano, Kwara and Lagos. The study aims to simultaneously test the clinical and cost-effectiveness of AZM (clinical trial) and the impact of implementation strategies (implementation research) in Nigeria’s unique healthcare context. The clinical trial is a two-arm, cluster-randomised controlled trial conducted across 48 health facilities, randomly assigned (1:1) to either intrapartum administration of oral AZM (intervention group) or usual care—the current routine practice (control group). A total of 5040 study participants (2520 in each group) will be enrolled in the clinical trial. The implementation trial is a two-arm cluster non-randomised controlled trial conducted in 12 health facilities (1:1) allocated to either a bottom-up approach using the Plan-Do-Study-Act cycle or a usual top-down approach with a one-time training workshop and distribution of clinical guidelines, with both arms administering oral AZM during vaginal birth while assessing fidelity (primary outcome).

For the clinical trial, data will be analysed using intention-to-treat statistical methods. The cost-effectiveness outcome will be analysed using the Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio. Implementation outcomes will be analysed using descriptive statistics and a thematic approach.

Ethics and dissemination

This study has been approved by the National Health Research Ethics Committee, Nigeria (NHREC/01/01/2007-30/09/2024), the ethics committees of the participating health institutions (Lagos University Teaching Hospital Research Ethics Committee: ADM/DSCST/HREC/APP/6325; University of Ilorin Teaching Hospital Health Research Ethics Committee: ERC/PAN/2025/03/0581; University of Benin Teaching Hospital Health Research Ethics Committee: ADM/E22/A/VOL. VII/483117141; Aminu Kano Teaching Hospital Research Ethics Committee: AKTH/MAC/SUB/12 A/P-3/VI/2509 and Irrua Specialist Teaching Hospital Research Ethics Committee: ISTH/HREC/20241507/605), the Ministries of Health of the six states and the National Agency for Food and Drug Administration and Control. Written informed consent will be obtained from all eligible study participants before enrolment. Results will be shared with communities and policy stakeholders and through peer-reviewed journals and will be presented at conferences.

Trial registration number

ISRCTN16415327.

Addressing Commercial Health determinants: Indigenous Empowerment and Voices for Equity (ACHIEVE)--protocol for a multiphase study

Por: Cubillo (Larrakia/Wadjigan) · B. J. · Browne · J. · Sherriff · S. · Walker (Yorta Yorta) · T. · Hill · K. · Crocetti · A. · Mitchell · F. · Backholer · K. · Maddox · R. · Brown · A. · Allender · S. · Wright · C. J. C. · Lacy-Nichols · J. · Chamberlain · C. · Ropitini (Ngati Kahungu
Introduction

The commercial determinants of health (CDoH) are a rapidly growing field of research and global health priority. Despite being disproportionately affected, Indigenous Peoples’ voices and perspectives are conspicuously absent from CDoH research and policy. This article outlines the protocol for Addressing Commercial Health determinants: Indigenous Empowerment and Voices for Equity (ACHIEVE), an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander-led project in Australia.

Methods and analysis

ACHIEVE integrates four research streams, using a novel combination of methods. The first three streams will (i) conceptualise the CDoH using Indigenous yarning methodology, (ii) evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of policies to reduce exposure to harmful marketing and (iii) assess the impacts of specific commercial entities on Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health using case studies. The final stream will consolidate findings from streams 1–3 and work with Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Organisations (ACCHOs) to co-create strategies for addressing the commercial determinants of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health.

Ethics and dissemination

Ethical approval for streams 1–3 has been granted by Deakin University Human Research Ethics Committee. ACHIEVE is guided by a governance model that prioritises Indigenous data sovereignty, community and ACCHO partnerships, capacity building and knowledge translation. Findings will be shared with participants, ACCHOs and policymakers to maximise research impact.

Associations between sociodemographic characteristics and knowledge about antibiotics and antibiotic resistance and usage of antibiotics from a One Health perspective in rural Bangladesh: a descriptive cross-sectional study

Por: Hicks · J. P. · Huque · R. · Fieroze · F. · Saify · M. B. · Ensor · T. · Islam · K. · Latham · S. · Mitchell · J. · Rahman · A. · Islam · M. N. · King · R.
Objectives

We explored how key sociodemographic characteristics were associated with correct knowledge about antibiotics and antibiotic resistance (ABR) and appropriate usage of antibiotics from a One Health perspective among rural community members in Bangladesh.

Design

Cross-sectional single-period survey.

Setting

Rural villages in Cumilla district, Bangladesh.

Participants

Eligibility criteria: aged ≥18. Across 50 clusters of villages, we approached 2160 community members and 2187 (98.8%) agreed to participate.

Primary and secondary outcome measures

Primary outcomes: we collected two knowledge outcomes measuring the number of correctly answered binary/multiple-choice questions about (1) antibiotics and ABR and appropriate usage of antibiotics in relation to human illness and (2) antibiotics and ABR and appropriate usage of antibiotics in relation to animal health and the environment. Secondary outcomes: self-reported awareness of (1) antibiotics and (2) ABR.

Results

Several sociodemographic characteristics were associated with variation in both knowledge outcomes. Education showed the strongest associations, with higher education levels associated with higher knowledge scores. For example, compared with having no formal/incomplete primary education, having higher education was associated with 10 percentage points (95% CI 8 to 12) and 6 percentage points (95% CI 3 to 8) higher mean knowledge scores for the knowledge outcomes 1 and 2, respectively. Having worked in the last month compared with not having worked was also weakly positively associated with both knowledge outcomes, and being female compared with being male was also weakly negatively associated with both knowledge outcomes.

Conclusions

Better public education is required to tackle ABR in Bangladesh but correct knowledge about antibiotics and ABR and appropriate usage of antibiotics in relation to humans, animals and the environment varies in relation to individuals’ education level, sex and working status. To maximise their effectiveness, interventions to tackle ABR must be flexible given recipients’ sociodemographic characteristics and pre-existing knowledge levels.

Association between carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity and cardiovascular disease in individuals with moderate blood pressure: a systematic review and individual participant meta-analysis

Por: Pavey · H. · Wood · A. · Mceniery · C. M. · AlGhatrif · M. · Arshi · B. · Brunner · E. · Chen · C.-H. · Cheng · H.-M. · Hansen · T. W. · Ikram · M. K. · Kavousi · M. · Kuh · D. · Kuipers · A. L. · Lakatta · E. G. · Linneberg · A. · Mattace Raso · F. · Mitchell · G. F. · Maldonado · J. · Ne
Objectives

The predictive value of carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV) for cardiovascular (CV) events in individuals with blood pressure (BP) 120–159/80–99 mm Hg, where more accurate risk stratification has the greatest clinical effect, is unknown. This study aims to determine whether cfPWV improves the prediction of CV events beyond traditional risk factors in individuals with moderate BP.

Design

A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Data sources

PubMed and EMBASE were searched through April 2023.

Eligibility criteria

We included prospective, population-based cohort studies with ≥1 year follow-up that directly measured cfPWV as an index of arterial stiffness and reported incident CV disease (CVD), atherosclerotic CVD (ASCVD), coronary heart disease, stroke or all-cause mortality outcomes.

Data extraction and synthesis

Individual participant data from 11 cohorts (n=15 987) were harmonised and analysed using two-stage random-effects meta-analysis. Incremental predictive and clinical utility analyses compared 10-year risk models with and without cfPWV.

Results

There were 1279 first atherosclerotic CV events over a median follow-up of 9.9 years. A 1-SD increase in loge(cfPWV) was associated with a 1.21-fold (95% CI 1.08 to 1.36) increase in risk of ASCVD. Adding cfPWV to traditional risk factors improved ASCVD prediction: change in discrimination (C-index): 0.0048 (95% CI 0.0002 to 0.0094), p=0.041. In hypothetical populations of 100 000 individuals with moderate BP, cfPWV-guided treatment could reduce event rates by 2.7% and 3.1% under European and US guidelines, respectively.

Conclusions

Adding cfPWV to traditional CV risk factors may improve the prediction and classification of first CV events in individuals with moderate BP. Additional screening with cfPWV could enhance risk stratification for antihypertensive treatment initiations.

NeuroMusic: protocol for a randomised-controlled trial of keyboard and singing music training programmes for older adults with mild cognitive impairment

Por: Menczel Schrire · Z. · Mitchell · H. F. · Low · L.-F. · Espinosa · N. · Eames · P. · Toltz · J. · Walsh · P. · Mowszowski · L. · Espinoza · D. · Lin · C. S.-Y. · Peres Da Costa · N. · Naismith · S. L.
Introduction

Music-based training programmes, such as learning how to play an instrument or sing in a choir, have been suggested as potential interventions for promoting healthy brain ageing in older adults at risk of cognitive decline because of their ability to enhance cognitive functions and potentially promote neuroplasticity. However, there is limited empirical evidence in older adults at risk of dementia, especially that evaluates both piano and singing interventions and their effects on cognition and neuroplasticity. In this protocol, we outline a study to assess the efficacy of keyboard and singing music training programmes on reducing cognitive decline and other outcomes in older adults with Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI).

Methods and analysis

This randomised, single-blind, controlled, parallel-group trial aims to enrol 432 individuals with MCI from the community in Sydney, Australia. Participants are randomly allocated to participate in either keyboard lessons, singing lessons or a film discussion control group once a week for 3 months. The primary objective is to assess the effectiveness of two music training programmes (keyboard and choral singing) for enhancing verbal memory after 3 months compared with control. Additionally, we will examine how these music-based interventions affect other aspects of cognition, mood, sleep, overall well-being, markers of brain plasticity and blood biomarkers of Alzheimer’s disease and neurodegeneration. Tertiary objectives are to identify factors that impact the success of the interventions, such as participation rates, engagement levels and key demographic and clinical features. Outcomes are collected at baseline and at 3 and 9 months. The primary endpoint analysis will include all randomised participants to estimate the treatment effect using intention-to-treat principles. Primary and secondary outcomes will be analysed using linear mixed models and effect size measures will be calculated.

This study will be the first robust, randomised controlled trial to assess the potential and relative value of music engagement for cognitive decline in high-risk MCI individuals, as well as broader effects on other markers of mental health, well-being and neurodegeneration. Co-designed with implementation in mind, the music interventions can potentially be delivered within memory clinic or community settings.

Ethics and dissemination

The Sydney University Human Research Ethics Committee (2023-026) has approved this protocol. The trial findings will be shared through conferences, publications and media.

Trial registration number

Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12623000407695), Registered 21/04/2023 https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=385552

Protocol version

2.02 29/11/2024.

Experience-based co-design informed development of a toolbox to help optimise primary care support during transition from childrens hospice care: HOPSCOTCH study protocol

Por: Chapman · E. · Mitchell · S. · Fraser · L. K. · Wozencroft · J. · Morris · B. · Peat · G. · Charles · T. · Elverson · J. · Carder · P. · Tallowin · K. · Magnusson · J. · Ziegler · L.
Introduction

The HOPSCOTCH study ‘Helping Optimise Primary Care Support During Transition From Children’s Hospice Care’ aims to develop a toolbox to enable engagement of primary care services in the care of young people with life-limiting conditions (LLC) with a specific focus on the point of transition from children’s hospice services.

Methods and analysis

Individual interviews will be held with young people with LLC, their families and healthcare professionals (HCPs). In alignment with Experience Based Co-Design (EBCD) methodology, extracts of film and audio from young people and family interviews will be combined to professionally produce a ‘catalyst film’ highlighting key points and experiences before, during and after the transition from children’s hospice care. Role-specific workshops will be held with young people with LLC, their families and HCPs working in primary care, children’s hospices and adult hospice services. The catalyst film will be used in feedback workshops to prompt prioritisation of key issues to take forward into toolbox development in a shared young people, family and HCP workshop. A documentary analysis of resources currently used to support transition and communication between care settings will support contextual understanding of the transition process. Young people, parents and professionals have shaped and continue to have influence over the study delivery as advisors alongside a multidisciplinary steering committee.

The study design has been guided by the UK Medical Research Council complex intervention framework. Intervention development draws on the principles of EBCD and is theoretically driven by the Behaviour Change Wheel.

Ethics and dissemination

The study is registered with the UK’s Clinical Study Registry (ISCTRN75964234).

Ethical approval was obtained from Wales 3 ethics board on 2 July 2025 (IRAS ID 334486). This study will include ongoing dissemination and knowledge transfer to key audiences (young people, parents, service providers, commissioners) via publications, national bodies, knowledge exchange events, web-based platforms, social media and clinical/academic forums.

Use of electronic point-of-care resources by early-career general practitioners and associations with their use during consultations: A cross-sectional analysis of consultation data.

Por: Mitchell · B. · Magin · P. · van Driel · M. L. · Tapley · A. · Ralston · A. · Davey · A. · Holliday · E. · Dizon · J. · Moad · D. · Fielding · A. · Fisher · K. · Clarke · L. · Spurling · G.
Objectives

To determine the use, frequency and factors linked to the use of any electronic point of care resources (ePOC resources) used by early-career general practitioners (GPs in training, otherwise known as GP residents or registrars) during consultations; and the frequency, and factors linked to the use of evidence-based clinical summaries.

Design

Cross-sectional analysis of data collected as part of the Registrar Clinical Encounters in Training (ReCEnT) project from 2018 to 2022. Every 6 months, GP trainees record 60 consecutive consultations, including information about their use of resources.

Setting

Australian training general practices.

Participants

3024 GP trainees in community-based vocational training.

Primary and secondary outcome measures

The primary outcome was the use of ePOC resources, and the secondary outcome was the use of evidence-based ePOC summaries.

Results

A total of 3024 GP trainees accessed electronic resources during patient encounters for 67 651/628 855 (10.8%) of diagnoses/problems. Use of ePOC resources increased 4% per year over the study period. Therapeutic Guidelines was accessed most often (27 435/79 536, 34.7% of all ePOC use) followed by Australian Medicines Handbook (7507, 9.4%) and HealthPathways (6965, 8.7%). Various factors were associated with increased use of ePOC resources, including increasing patient age, diagnosis/problem type, increasing years of experience prior to GP training and stage of training. GP trainees rarely accessed dedicated evidence-based clinical summaries.

Conclusions

Australian GP trainees use a range of resources to answer their clinical questions, mostly from Therapeutic Guidelines and prescribing compendiums, but also system specific resources that are free to access.

Transition towards healthcare 'net zero: modelling condition-specific patient travel carbon emission estimations by transport mode in a retrospective population-based cohort study, Greater Glasgow, UK

Por: Olsen · J. R. · Nicholls · N. · Tran · T. Q. B. · Pell · J. · Lewsey · J. · Dundas · R. · Friday · J. · Du Toit · C. · Lip · S. · Mackay · D. · Stevenson · A. · Mitchell · R. · Padmanabhan · S.
Objectives

To estimate condition-specific patient travel distances and associated carbon emissions across common chronic diseases in routine National Health Service (NHS) care, and to assess the potential carbon savings of modal shifts in transportation.

Design

Retrospective population-based cohort study.

Setting

NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Scotland.

Participants

6599 patients aged 50–55 years at diagnosis, including cardiovascular disease (n=1711), epilepsy (n=1044), cancer (n=716), rheumatoid arthritis (RA; n=172) and a matched control group based on age, sex and area-level deprivation (n=2956).

Main outcome measures

Annual home-to-clinic distances and associated carbon emissions modelled under four transport modes (petrol car, electric car, bus, train) across five time points: 2-year prediagnosis, diagnosis year and 2-year postdiagnosis.

Results

Mean annual travel distances to hospital varied by condition and peaked at diagnosis. Patients with cancer had the highest travel distances (161 km/patient/year for men; 139 km/patient/year for women), followed by RA (approximately 78 km/patient/year). The matched control group travelled 2/patient/year to 8.0 kg CO2/patient/year. Bus travel resulted in intermediate emissions, estimated between 10.5 and 8.0 kg CO2/patient. When travel was modelled using electric vehicles, emissions dropped between 3.5 and 2.7 kg for all conditions. Train travel produced similarly low emissions. Reducing petrol car travel from 100% to 60% lowered emissions up to 6.6 kg CO2/patient.

Conclusions

Condition-specific estimates of healthcare-related travel emissions provide baseline understanding of the opportunities and challenges for decarbonising healthcare. Emission reduction is most achievable through modal shift, yet such shifts depend on factors beyond NHS control—such as transport infrastructure, digital access and social equity. Multisectoral strategies, including targeted telemedicine and integrated transport and urban planning, are critical to achieving net-zero healthcare while maintaining equitable access to care.

Do opportunities exist to improve the use of the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist in cardiology and cardiothoracic surgery? Perspectives of patients and staff in a multimethod study in New Zealand

Por: Jowsey · T. · Ward · K. · Baradi · A. · Gargiulo · D. · Henderson · K. · Mitchell · S. J. · Moore · M. · Somaratne · J. · Merry · A. F.
Objectives

The WHO Surgical Safety Checklist (SSC) can improve patient outcomes through checks and enhancing the safety climate, provided the team engage. Patients are central to that team and may be awake during part or all of many procedures. Their greater inclusion in the SSC process could enhance its checking objectives by using patient knowledge of details relevant to proposed procedures, and its objective of improving culture by emphasising patient identity, seeing patients as individuals rather than items on a production line. We aimed to evaluate SSC use, including clinicians’ and patients’ perspectives, in cardiothoracic operating rooms (CTORs) and cardiac catheterisation laboratories (CCLs), and to identify opportunities to refine its use in these spaces.

Design

We undertook a multimethod study based on positivism and interpretivism, with evaluation of SSC administration and interviews. We evaluated SSC administration during 20 Sign Ins, 20 Time Outs and 20 Sign Outs in CTORs and 20 Time Outs in CCLs (11 coronary angiography and 9 electrophysiology cases) using the WHO Behaviourally Anchored Rating Scale (WHOBARS, 1–7, where higher scores indicate better practice). We additionally interviewed 10 clinicians and 17 patients about their experiences and perceptions of safety and SSC use. We undertook thematic analysis of interview data.

Setting

CTORs and CCLs in an Auckland public hospital.

Participants

We observed 171 clinicians during 20 cases. We interviewed 10 clinicians (Pakeha/New Zealand/European n=6; male n=5; doctor n=5). We interviewed 17 patients (Pakeha/New Zealand/European n=12; male n=10; age range 45–81 years).

Results

In CTORs, the SSC was used in full: median (IQR) WHOBARS score was 5.9 (5.2, 6.5). In CCLs, its use differed between electrophysiology and angiography CCLs: median (IQR) WHOBARS score was 4.50 (3.2, 5.6). In both CTORs and CCLs, high levels of carefulness and respect between team members were observed. Clinicians described the SSC as valuable and identified context-related reasons for variations in its use. Patients wanted to feel cared for and respected (including culturally). The SSC contributed positively to this. Clinicians expressed reservations about increasing patients’ involvement with the SSC. However, patients’ comments supported their increased engagement in the SSC process (including establishing their preferred names).

Conclusions

The SSC is used at Auckland City Hospital with some variation between services and with high levels of carefulness and respect. The SSC increased patients’ sense of being cared for. With modification (eg, by verifying their preferred name during the Sign In phase), the SSC could enhance patients’ perception of being seen as individuals, their cultural safety and the safety climate in operating and procedure rooms, and hence potentially improve patient outcomes. Our findings reinforce the value of regular evaluation and context-relevant modification of SSC for its effective use.

Nurses' Perceptions of the Relevance of Their Role and Responsibilities for Adopting Evidence‐Based Feedback Into Practice: An Implementation Study

ABSTRACT

Aims

To evaluate the implementation process of a novel program focused on improving interactive (dialogic) feedback between clinicians and students during placement.

Design

Quantitative cross-sectional hybrid type 3 effectiveness–implementation study driven by a federated model of social learning theory and implementation theory.

Methods

From June to November 2018, feedback approaches supported by socio-constructive learning theory and Normalisation Process Theory were enacted in four clinical units of a healthcare facility in southeast Queensland, Australia. The study involved 16 clinical instructors/supervisors, 94 bedside nurses, and 85 final-year nursing students. Engagement was evaluated using the Normalisation Measure Development survey. Situated learning encounters were constructed based on the needs of each group.

Results

Survey results of the four Normalisation Process Theory constructs identified variable adoption by participant groups. Engagement in situated learning encounters that facilitate dialogic feedback was greatest in clinical instructors/supervisors, followed by students. Bedside registered nurses, while indicating they understood purposeful feedback behaviours, did not demonstrate them in practice.

Conclusion

The extent to which each group practiced dialogic feedback depended on their perceptions of their influence, whether they saw it as part of their role, and the effort and time required, regardless of the activity's importance, role statements, and codes of conduct.

Implications for the Profession

Understanding the norms that shape communication, engagement, and nurses' role priorities is crucial for guiding practice and ongoing engagement with feedback.

Impact

The research provides valuable insights for leaders aiming to enhance the integration of evidence into practice. It guides leaders to understand that participants prioritise the reach, relevance, and resources of evidence over formal role descriptions, responsibilities, policies, and codes of conduct. This research encourages leaders to scrutinise existing beliefs, norms, and routines when implementing evidence-based practices.

Reporting Method

Standards for Reporting Implementation Studies (StaRI) reporting guidelines were used.

No Patient or Public Contribution

None.

Consensus‐Building Processes for Implementing Perioperative Care Pathways in Common Elective Surgeries: A Systematic Review

ABSTRACT

Aims

To identify and understand the different approaches to local consensus discussions that have been used to implement perioperative pathways for common elective surgeries.

Design

Systematic review.

Data Sources

Five databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library) were searched electronically for literature published between 1 January 2000 and 6 April 2023.

Methods

Two reviewers independently screened studies for inclusion and assessed quality. Data were extracted using a structured extraction tool. A narrative synthesis was undertaken to identify and categorise the core elements of local consensus discussions reported. Data were synthesised into process models for undertaking local consensus discussions.

Results

The initial search returned 1159 articles after duplicates were removed. Following title and abstract screening, 135 articles underwent full-text review. A total of 63 articles met the inclusion criteria. Reporting of local consensus discussions varied substantially across the included studies. Four elements were consistently reported, which together define a structured process for undertaking local consensus discussions.

Conclusions

Local consensus discussions are a common implementation strategy used to reduce unwarranted clinical variation in surgical care. Several models for undertaking local consensus discussions and their implementation are presented.

Implications for the Profession and/or Patient Care

Advancing our understanding of consensus building processes in perioperative pathway development could be significantly improved by refining reporting standards to include criteria for achieving consensus and assessing implementation fidelity, alongside advocating for a systematic approach to employing consensus discussions in hospitals.

Impact

These findings contribute to recognised gaps in the literature, including how decisions are commonly made in the design and implementation of perioperative pathways, furthering our understanding of the meaning of consensus processes that can be used by clinicians undertaking improvement initiatives.

Reporting Method

This review adheres to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines.

No patient or public contribution.

Trial Registration: CRD42023413817

Pre-conception lifestyle intervention to optimise maternal health for a better start to life: the BEGIN BETTER prospective randomised controlled trial protocol

Por: Mitchell · M. · Deussen · A. R. · Louise · J. · Poprzeczny · A. J. · Keir · A. K. · Briley · A. L. · Oxlad · M. · Dodd · J. M.
Introduction

Overweight and obesity impacts approximately 50% of pregnant women. Professional medical colleges worldwide recommend women with a higher body mass index (BMI) lose weight before conception. While diet and lifestyle interventions before pregnancy are associated with improvements in diet and modest weight loss, subsequent clinical pregnancy outcomes are poorly reported.

Our aim is to conduct a randomised controlled trial of a comprehensive lifestyle intervention for women with overweight or obesity who are planning pregnancy. We will evaluate the impact of this intervention on maternal health and well-being prior to conception; and pregnancy, birth and newborn health outcomes in a subsequent pregnancy.

Methods and analysis

Women with a BMI ≥25.0 kg/m2 who plan to conceive within 2 years will be recruited.

Women randomised to the ‘Educational Control Group’ will attend a pre-conception health consultation with a research midwife, providing limited information about obesity and associated risks in pregnancy, nutrition, exercise and weight management.

Women randomised to the ‘Pre-pregnancy Lifestyle Intervention Group’ will attend a pre-conception health consultation with a research midwife, as above, and additionally consult with a research dietitian and trained health coaches throughout the 6-month intervention period. Women will also have access to a specifically designed mHealth application providing tailored content and interactive tasks delivered bi-weekly during this time.

The primary outcome is infant birth weight z-score

Secondary outcomes will include a range of maternal pre-conception health outcomes; maternal and infant pregnancy and birth outcomes; diet and physical activity changes; and quality of life.

We estimate a mean birth weight z-score of 0.43 (SD 1.09) and will recruit 800 women to detect 0.4 SD difference (alpha 0.05 (two-tailed); power 80%). Analyses will be intention to treat with estimates reported as relative risks and 95% CIs.

Ethics and dissemination

The study protocol was approved by the Human Research and Ethics Committee of the Women’s and Children’s Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia (HREC/17/WCHN/177; 2020/HRE01445) on 17 August 2018. The first participant was recruited in June 2021, with recruitment anticipated through 2025. The study results will be disseminated in open-access international journals, scientific meetings and conferences with stakeholders.

Trial registration number

ACTRN 12621000128897. This study has been registered at (https://www.anzctr.org.au/).

Health and social service use by adults before and after cochlear implantation: a national population-level retrospective cohort study in Australia

Por: Okuba · T. · Lystad · R. P. · Boisvert · I. · McMaugh · A. · Moore · R. C. M. · Wolnizer · P. · Chow · C. · Walson · R. · Mitchell · R.
Objective

To examine health and social service use pre- and post-cochlear implant in adults.

Design

A retrospective cohort study.

Setting

All public and private hospitals in Australia.

Participants

A total of 3033 adults aged ≥18 years who received a cochlear implant in Australia between 1 January 2014 and 31 December 2018 were included. Participants were followed for 3 years pre-implant date and 3 years post-implant date or until death. Data were sourced from the Person Level Integrated Data Asset.

Primary and secondary outcome measures

The study examined the (i) number of visits to general practitioners (GPs), specialists and audiologists; (ii) fee charged, benefit paid and out-of-pocket (OOP) expenses for health services; (iii) personal income; (iv) completion of higher education and post-high school vocational education and training and (v) number of government benefits and concession cards received.

Results

The mean age of adults at cochlear implantation was 63.3 years (SD 16.1). Over the 3 years period before and after implantation, the mean number of GP visits remained stable (24.5 pre-implant vs 24.7 post-implant), specialist visits decreased (6.4 pre-implant vs 5.3 post-implant) and audiologist visits increased (1.7 pre-implant vs 6.6 post-implant). Higher GP visit rates were observed both pre- and post-implantation among females (RR 1.13 vs 1.14), older adults (RR 1.06 vs 1.15), individuals needing assistance with daily activities (RR 1.11 vs 1.12), individuals with chronic health conditions (RR 1.25 vs 1.34), with ≥6 RxRisk comorbidities (RR 2.35 vs 2.22) and adults residing in socio-economically disadvantaged areas (RR 1.64 vs 1.19). Mental health conditions were associated with increased specialist visits pre- and post-implantation (RR 2.57 vs 2.53), while employed individuals had higher specialist visit rates post-implantation (RR 1.58). Average OOP costs for health services decreased by 31.4% post-implant. Government benefits were higher pre-implant (55.6%) than post-implant (44.4%). Females and adults needing assistance with activities of daily living were more likely to seek government benefits.

Conclusions

These findings highlight the need for tailored healthcare and social support services to address the diverse needs of cochlear implant users, ensuring comprehensive care and support throughout their healthcare journey.

Development and evaluation of the first fertility preservation patient decision aid to support boys and young men with cancer: The Cancer, Fertility and Me for Boys and Young Men research protocol.

Por: Jones · G. L. · Musson · D. S. · ODonnell · N. · Lewis · A. · Williamson · M. · Yeomanson · D. · Pacey · A. · Lane · S. · Folan · A.-M. · Gough · B. · Phillips · B. · Porteous · C. · Anderson · R. · Mitchell · R. T.
Introduction

Many cancer treatments can result in reduced fertility, impacting survivors’ opportunities for biological parenthood. Fertility preservation (FP) methods for boys and young men, such as cryopreservation of testicular tissue or sperm, offer hope but are currently underused among young male patients with cancer. Despite guidelines recommending early discussion of fertility implications, many newly diagnosed males do not receive FP counselling or referral to fertility services. Male cancer survivors face a higher likelihood of infertility than their peers, yet focused FP decision-making support is lacking. This study aims to address this gap by developing and evaluating the first dedicated patient decision aid (PtDA) for boys and young male patients with cancer aged 11–25 years old, to help them make informed FP decisions before receiving cancer treatment.

Methods and analysis

The current study follows a multistage process: developing the PtDA, alpha testing for acceptability with former patients, parents and healthcare professionals, and beta testing in clinical settings to ensure effective integration into routine care. Using a combination of interviews and questionnaire data, this research will assess the PtDA’s acceptability and impact on decision-making.

Ethics and dissemination

This study has been prospectively registered on the Research Registry (10273). Ethics approval has been obtained from Leeds Beckett University and the National Health Service/Health Research Authority before undertaking data collection. The final resource will be disseminated widely and made freely available online via our dedicated Cancer, Fertility and Me website, for use in clinical and research practice.

Arrhythmia burden, symptoms and quality of life in female and male endurance athletes with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: a multicentre cohort study in Norway, Australia and Belgium

Por: Apelland · T. · Letnes · J. M. · Janssens · K. · Claessen · G. · Tveit · A. · Sellevold · A. B. · Mitchell · A. · Willems · R. · Onarheim · S. · Enger · S. · Kizilkilic · S. E. · Miljoen · H. · Elliott · A. · Loennechen · J. P. · La Gerche · A. · Myrstad · M. · The NEXAF Investigators
Objectives

To assess atrial fibrillation (AF) burden, symptoms and quality of life (QoL) in endurance athletes with paroxysmal AF.

Design

Prospective cohort study.

Setting and participants

Otherwise healthy endurance athletes with paroxysmal AF in Norway, Australia and Belgium. The current study presents baseline measurements collected before the intervention of a randomised controlled trial on effects of individually tailored training adaptation.

Methods

AF burden (percentage time in AF) was measured by insertable cardiac monitors (Confirm Rx, Abbott). AF-related symptoms and QoL were assessed using the Atrial Fibrillation Effect on QualiTy-of-Life Questionnaire (AFEQT) with any score

Results

43 athletes (age 57±10 (mean±SD), range 33–75 years, 3 women) were included. The athletes were monitored for 50±18 days. Median AF burden was 0.18% (IQR 0%–2.6%). Out of 29 athletes with at least one AF episode, 21 (72%) had AF episodes >60 min. 13 athletes (30%) had AFEQT overall score 60 min were associated with reduced QoL (mean AFEQT score 78 vs 90, p=0.001 and 78 vs 90, p=0.001, respectively). There were large individual variations between the athletes concerning AF burden, symptoms and QoL.

Conclusions

Although most athletes were still competing, more than half had troublesome symptoms. One-third had reduced QoL, which was associated with higher AF burden and longer duration of AF episodes. Variations between the athletes highlight the need for individually tailored AF management in athletes with paroxysmal AF.

Trial registration number

NCT04991337.

Interpractice variability in antibiotic prescribing for acute respiratory tract infections: a cross-sectional study of Australian early-career general practitioners

Por: Turner · A. · van Driel · M. L. · Mitchell · B. · Holliday · E. · Davis · J. · Tapley · A. · Davey · A. · Ralston · A. · Dizon · J. · Baillie · E. · Fielding · A. · Mulquiney · K. · Clarke · L. · Spike · N. · Magin · P.
Objectives

Frequency of general practitioners’ (GPs’) antibiotic prescribing for acute, self-limiting respiratory tract infections (aRTIs) is high. The practice environment and culture influence the clinical behaviour, including prescribing behaviour, of GP specialist vocational trainees (registrars). We aimed to assess inter-practice variability in registrars’ antibiotic prescribing.

Design

This was a cross-sectional analysis from the Registrar Clinical Encounters in Training (ReCEnT) cohort study, from 2010 to 2020.

Setting

ReCEnT documents registrars’ clinical experiences and behaviours. Before 2016, 5 of 17 Australian training regions participated in ReCEnT. From 2016, three of nine regions (~40% of Australian registrars) participated.

Participants

3210 registrars (response rate 91.8%) from 1286 training practices contributed to the analysis.

Outcome measures

The outcomes were prescription of an antibiotic for new diagnoses of (1) all aRTIs and (2) acute bronchitis diagnoses specifically. Prescribing percentages were calculated at the training practice level. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used to measure the ratio of interpractice variation to total variance. Median ORs (MORs) were also estimated to quantify interpractice variability.

Results

Practice-level antibiotic prescribing percentages ranged from 0% to 100% for both aRTIs and acute bronchitis diagnoses in the primary analysis. ICCs for aRTI prescribing were 0.08 (unadjusted) and 0.02 (adjusted). For acute bronchitis, ICCs were 0.10 (unadjusted) and 0.05 (adjusted). MORs were 1.66 (unadjusted) and 1.32 (adjusted) for aRTIs. MORs for acute bronchitis were 1.80 (unadjusted) and 1.53 (adjusted). This indicates a marked variation in the odds of a patient receiving antibiotics for an aRTI if randomly attending different practices.

Conclusions

There was considerable interpractice variation in registrars’ antibiotic prescribing frequencies. Further research is required to examine the factors accounting for this variation and to develop practice-level interventions to reduce antibiotic prescribing in high-prescribing practices.

❌