FreshRSS

🔒
❌ Acerca de FreshRSS
Hay nuevos artículos disponibles. Pincha para refrescar la página.
AnteayerTus fuentes RSS

Burden of diabetic ketoacidosis among patients with diabetes mellitus in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Por: Abera · E. G. · Yesho · D. H. · Erega · F. T. · Adulo · Z. A. · Gebreselasse · M. Z. · Gebremichael · E. H.
Objectives

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the magnitude and determinants of diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) among patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) in Ethiopia.

Design

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Participants

Age 15 and above all patients with diabetes with the diagnosis of DKA in Ethiopia

Data source

PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Science Direct, HINARI, Google Scholar and grey literatures were accessed to find relevant articles. Studies that have been conducted and reported in English language, articles with an available full-text, and observational studies were included. The task of searching sources was carried out from all stated electronic databases performed during 15 April–29 April 2023.

Primary and secondary outcome measures

Eligible studies were critically appraised by three independent reviewers for methodological quality in the review using standardised critical appraisal instruments from Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) for observational studies. After the finally extracted studies were exported, systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted using Unified Management, Assessment and Review of Information (JBI SUMARI) (JBI, Adelaide, Australia) and STATA V.17 software. Sensitivity tests were done, and funnel plot inspections with Egger’s test were used to check for publication bias.

Result

From a total of 19 studies with 6498 study participants, the pooled prevalence of DKA among patients with DM in Ethiopia was 30.92% (95% CI 29.96 to 31.89) with a significant statistical heterogeneity (I2=99.2, p=

Conclusion

This systematic review and meta-analysis revealed that the prevalence of DKA among patients with DM in Ethiopia was 30.92%. Besides, different behavioural and clinical determinants of DKA among patients with DM were identified. However, further studies should be conducted, particularly on the possible determinants of DKA, and different stakeholders should be engaged to minimise its burden.

All-cause and cause-specific mortality among individuals imprisoned for driving under the influence of alcohol and drugs in Norway (2000-2016): a retrospective cohort study

Por: Jamt · R. E. G. · Bukten · A. · Stavseth · M. R. · Bogstrand · S. T. · Tverborgvik · T.
Aims

To describe all-cause and cause-specific mortality and to investigate factors associated with mortality among individuals imprisoned for driving under the influence (DUI) of alcohol and psychoactive drugs in the Norwegian prison population.

Design

Retrospective cohort study. The Norwegian prison registry was linked to the Norwegian Cause of Death Registry (2000–2016).

Setting

Norway.

Participants/cases

The cohort consisted of 96 856 individuals imprisoned in Norway over a 17-year period obtained from the Norwegian prison registry.

Primary and secondary outcome measures

Adjusted ORs (aOR) with 95% CI were calculated for death due to any, natural and unnatural causes of death. Analyses were stratified according to DUI convictions: no DUI convictions, only DUI convictions (DUI only), DUI and at least one other drug and alcohol conviction (DUI drug), and DUI and at least one conviction other than drug and alcohol conviction (DUI other).

Results

In total, 29.3% individuals had one or more imprisonments for DUI. The risk of all-cause mortality was elevated for those convicted for DUI, but only in combination with other types of crimes (DUI drug: aOR=1.5, 95% CI 1.4 to 1.6, DUI other: aOR=1.2, 95% CI 1.1 to 1.4). The risk of death from natural causes was significantly elevated for DUI drug (aOR: 1.8, 95% CI 1.6 to 2.0) and for DUI other (aOR=1.3, 95% CI 1.1 to 1.6). The risk of death from unnatural causes was lower for DUI only (aOR=0.8, 95% CI 0.7 to 0.9) and elevated for DUI drug (aOR=1.5, 95% CI 1.3 to 1.6).

Conclusions

The risk of all-cause mortality was significantly elevated for those convicted of DUI, but only in combination with other types of crimes.

Defining 'therapeutic value of medicines: a scoping review

Por: Glaus · C. E. G. · Kloeti · A. · Vokinger · K. N.
Objectives

In recent years, discussions on the importance and scope of therapeutic value of new medicines have intensified, stimulated by the increase of prices and number of medicines entering the market. This study aims to perform a scoping review identifying factors contributing to the definition of the therapeutic value of medicines.

Design

Scoping review.

Data sources

We searched the MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, Business Source Premier, EconLit, Regional Business News, Cochrane, Web of Science, Scope and Pool databases through December 2020 in English, German, French, Italian and Spanish.

Eligibility criteria

Studies that included determinants for the definition of therapeutic value of medicines were included.

Data extraction and synthesis

Data were extracted using the mentioned data sources. Two reviewers independently screened and analysed the articles. Data were analysed from April 2021 to May 2022.

Results

Of the 1883 studies screened, 51 were selected and the identified factors contributing to the definition of therapeutic value of medicines were classified in three categories: patient perspective, public health perspective and socioeconomic perspective. More than three-quarters of the included studies were published after 2014, with the majority of the studies focusing on either cancer disorders (14 of 51, 27.5%) or rare diseases (11 of 51, 21.6%). Frequently mentioned determinants for value were quality of life, therapeutic alternatives and side effects (all patient perspective), prevalence/incidence and clinical endpoints (all public health perspective), and costs (socioeconomic perspective).

Conclusions

Multiple determinants have been developed to define the therapeutic value of medicines, most of them focusing on cancer disorders and rare diseases. Considering the relevance of value of medicines to guide patients and physicians in decision-making as well as policymakers in resource allocation decisions, a development of evidence-based factors for the definition of therapeutic value of medicines is needed across all therapeutic areas.

Perceptions of academic staff and students of senior high school in implementing game-based exercises in physical education classes--a research protocol for a qualitative descriptive study

Por: Manlapaz · D. · Vergara · J. A. · Alpuerto · K. M. B. · De Los Santos · I. K. S. · Enriquez · M. U. · Manicio · Z. Z. · Mendres · J. E. F. · Tolosa · C. G. S. · Vilela · Z. G. D. · Zabat · Z. E. G. A.
Background

The COVID-19 pandemic has taken a toll on both physical activity and fitness as several pursuits and activities have been restricted. Coupled with this, increased food intake and sedentary lifestyles have produced poor physical health outcomes. Online physical education classes have been more difficult to conduct given the limitations of the setup. As such, exergaming has been identified as a possible educational tool that could improve students’ motivation, participation and fitness levels and reduce negative behaviours in class while contributing to the current curriculum.

Objectives

The study explores the perspectives of both the physical education academic staff and senior high school students from the University of Santo Tomas on the implementation of exergaming to determine the feasibility of exergaming as an educational tool in the Philippines’ physical education curriculum.

Methodology

A descriptive qualitative design will be used and participants will be selected through criterion sampling. The authors will conduct a process of question development and pilot FGDs beforehand to ensure smooth proceedings. Once done, they will undergo FGDs conducted through Google Meet. Data will be coded and analysed via thematic analysis using manual coding and NVivo V.12 software to summarise central themes and perceptions.

Ethics and dissemination

This study will abide by the Nuremberg Code, Declaration of Helsinki, Belmont Report, Data Privacy Act of 2012 and National Ethical Guidelines (for health-related research) of 2017. The study has received approval from the University of Santo Tomas (UST)-College of Rehabilitation Sciences (CRS) Ethics Review Committee. All participant data will be labelled according to random two-digit computer generated codes to preserve anonymity and stored in password-protected laptops and Google Drive folders to preserve confidentiality. Results will be made available to individual UST physical education academic staff and senior high school students prior to publication in peer-reviewed journal.

Understanding and addressing changing administrative workload in primary care in Canada: protocol for a mixed-method study

Por: Lavergne · M. R. · Moravac · C. · Bergin · F. · Buote · R. · Easley · J. · Grudniewicz · A. · Hedden · L. · Leslie · M. · McKay · M. · Marshall · E. G. · Martin-Misener · R. · Mooney · M. · Palmer · E. · Tracey · J.
Introduction

Many Canadians struggle to access the primary care they need while at the same time primary care providers report record levels of stress and overwork. There is an urgent need to understand factors contributing to the gap between a growing per-capita supply of primary care providers and declines in the availability of primary care services. The assumption of responsibility by primary care teams for services previously delivered on an in-patient basis, along with a rise in administrative responsibilities may be factors influencing reduced access to care.

Methods and analysis

In this mixed-methods study, our first objective is to determine how the volume of services requiring primary care coordination has changed over time in the Canadian provinces of Nova Scotia and New Brunswick. We will collect quantitative administrative data to investigate how services have shifted in ways that may impact administrative workload in primary care. Our second objective is to use qualitative interviews with family physicians, nurse practitioners and administrative team members providing primary care to understand how administrative workload has changed over time. We will then identify priority issues and practical response strategies using two deliberative dialogue events convened with primary care providers, clinical and system leaders, and policy-makers.

We will analyse changes in service use data between 2001/2002 and 2021/2022 using annual total counts, rates per capita, rates per primary care provider and per primary care service. We will conduct reflexive thematic analysis to develop themes and to compare and contrast participant responses reflecting differences across disciplines, payment and practice models, and practice settings. Areas of concern and potential solutions raised during interviews will inform deliberative dialogue events.

Ethics and dissemination

We received research ethics approval from Nova Scotia Health (#1028815). Knowledge translation will occur through dialogue events, academic papers and presentations at national and international conferences.

Integrating participants as partners in research governance and operations: an approach from the All of Us Research Program Engagement Core

Por: Hammack-Aviran · C. · Fair · A. M. · Aldrich · M. · Richmond · J. · Carpenter · S. M. · Watson · K. S. · Cohn · E. G. · Wilkins · C. H.
Objectives

During the last two decades, researchers and funders increasingly recognised the value of engaging patients and communities in research. Despite progress, community engagement remains challenging. There are few examples of successful participant engagement in governance of large-scale research programmes. Here we describe efforts to engage participants as partners in new governance roles in the All of Us Research Program, a precision medicine research initiative which intends to enrol at least one million participants. Using intentional, participant-centric engagement strategies, the All of Us Engagement Core recruited and integrated a diverse group of participants into governance roles including Steering and Executive Committees. Evaluation measures included a survey to assess Consortium Members’ readiness for participant engagement.

Results

Over a 3-year period, all items on the survey increased (higher readiness). Of the 291 respondents to the 2021 survey, respondents most frequently agreed that participant perspectives are essential (100%), participants understand enough to contribute meaningfully (94%) and participants should be involved in setting goals (96%). Respondents least frequently agreed that participants should have an equal voice in Working Groups (75%), Steering Committee (69%) and Executive Committee (63%).

Conclusion

In conclusion, participants can be effectively integrated into large-scale research governance, which is associated with increased researcher readiness for engagement.

What are effective vaccine distribution approaches for equity-deserving and high-risk populations during COVID-19? Exploring best practices and recommendations in Canada: protocol for a mixed-methods multiple case codesign study

Por: Aggarwal · M. · Katz · A. · Kokorelias · K. M. · Wong · S. T. · Aghajafari · F. · Ivers · N. M. · Martin-Misener · R. · Aubrey-Bassler · K. · Breton · M. · Upshur · R. E. G. · Kwong · J. C.
Introduction

The WHO has stated that vaccine hesitancy is a serious threat to overcoming COVID-19. Vaccine hesitancy among underserved and at-risk communities is an ongoing challenge in Canada. Public confidence in vaccine safety and effectiveness and the principles of equity need to be considered in vaccine distribution. In Canada, governments of each province or territory manage their own healthcare system, providing an opportunity to compare and contrast distribution strategies. The overarching objective of this study is to identify effective vaccine distribution approaches and advance knowledge on how to design and implement various strategies to meet the different needs of underserved communities.

Methods and analysis

Multiple case studies in seven Canadian provinces will be conducted using a mixed-methods design. The study will be informed by Experience-Based CoDesign techniques and theoretically guided by the Socio-Ecological Model and the Vaccine Hesitancy Matrix frameworks. Phase 1 will involve a policy document review to systematically explore the vaccine distribution strategy over time in each jurisdiction. This will inform the second phase, which will involve (2a) semistructured, in-depth interviews with policymakers, public health officials, researchers, providers, groups representing patients, researchers and stakeholders and (2b) an analysis of population-based administrative health data of vaccine administration. Integration of qualitative and quantitative data will inform the identification of effective vaccine distribution approaches for various populations. Informed by this evidence, phase 3 of the study will involve conducting focus groups with multiple stakeholders to codesign recommendations for the design and implementation of effective vaccine delivery strategies for equity-deserving and at-risk populations.

Ethics and dissemination

This study is approved by the University of Toronto’s Health Sciences Research Ethics Board (#42643), University of British Columbia Behavioural Research Ethics Board (#H22-01750-A002), Research Ethics Board of the Nova Scotia Health Authority (#48272), Newfoundland and Labrador Health Research Ethics Board (#2022.126), Conjoint Health Research Ethics Board, University of Calgary (REB22-0207), and University of Manitoba Health Research Board (H2022-239). The outcome of this study will be to produce a series of recommendations for implementing future vaccine distribution approaches from the perspective of various stakeholders, including equity-deserving and at-risk populations.

Precancerous cervical lesion screening acceptance among women in Eastern Ethiopia

Por: Wakwoya · E. B. · Sadi · C. G. · Sendo · E. G.
Objective

This study assessed perceived barriers, precancerous cervical lesion screening acceptance, and associated factors among women in Eastern Ethiopia.

Setting

This study was conducted in Hiwot Fana Specialized Hospital and Jugal Hospital.

Study design

This study is a facility-based cross-sectional study.

Study participants

This study included 1181 women aged 25–49 years. Bivariate and multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate the relationship between variables and control confounders.

Results

Nearly half of the participants (587 or 49.7%) agreed to be screened for precancerous cervical lesions. Seventy-six per cent of those checked were negative for visual inspection with acetic acid, 18.5% were positive, and 5.7% had cancer-like lesions. In multivariable analysis, fear of discomfort from the screening procedure, having a male screener, and embarrassment were the perceived barriers that were inversely associated with screening acceptance.

Conclusions

The uptake of the screening service in the study area was not satisfactory, indicating that the programme was underutilised in the area.

(Cost-)effectiveness of an individualised risk prediction tool (PERSARC) on patients knowledge and decisional conflict among soft-tissue sarcomas patients: protocol for a parallel cluster randomised trial (the VALUE-PERSARC study)

Introduction

Current treatment decision-making in high-grade soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) care is not informed by individualised risks for different treatment options and patients’ preferences. Risk prediction tools may provide patients and professionals insight in personalised risks and benefits for different treatment options and thereby potentially increase patients’ knowledge and reduce decisional conflict. The VALUE-PERSARC study aims to assess the (cost-)effectiveness of a personalised risk assessment tool (PERSARC) to increase patients’ knowledge about risks and benefits of treatment options and to reduce decisional conflict in comparison with usual care in high-grade extremity STS patients.

Methods

The VALUE-PERSARC study is a parallel cluster randomised control trial that aims to include at least 120 primarily diagnosed high-grade extremity STS patients in 6 Dutch hospitals. Eligible patients (≥18 years) are those without a treatment plan and treated with curative intent. Patients with sarcoma subtypes or treatment options not mentioned in PERSARC are unable to participate. Hospitals will be randomised between usual care (control) or care with the use of PERSARC (intervention). In the intervention condition, PERSARC will be used by STS professionals in multidisciplinary tumour boards to guide treatment advice and in patient consultations, where the oncological/orthopaedic surgeon informs the patient about his/her diagnosis and discusses benefits and harms of all relevant treatment options. The primary outcomes are patients’ knowledge about risks and benefits of treatment options and decisional conflict (Decisional Conflict Scale) 1 week after the treatment decision has been made. Secondary outcomes will be evaluated using questionnaires, 1 week and 3, 6 and 12 months after the treatment decision. Data will be analysed following an intention-to-treat approach using a linear mixed model and taking into account clustering of patients within hospitals.

Ethics and dissemination

The Medical Ethical Committee Leiden-Den Haag-Delft (METC-LDD) approved this protocol (NL76563.058.21). The results of this study will be reported in a peer-review journal.

Trial registration number

NL9160, NCT05741944.

❌