Loneliness and social isolation are critical public health issues linked to significant adverse health outcomes and increased healthcare utilisation, including visits to the emergency department (ED). The ED often serves as a primary societal safety net, providing care for vulnerable populations who may be disproportionately affected by these conditions. In fact, loneliness and social isolation might be the underlying reasons they presented to the ED in the first place either consciously or not. For such individuals, the ED encounter may represent a rare point of human contact, yet the stressful and depersonalising nature of the ED environment may paradoxically exacerbate their sense of isolation. Furthermore, ED staff may lack the training and awareness of the scope of the problem to properly screen for loneliness and address it. Yet, the compounded impact of the ED experience on lonely or socially isolated patients and the relationship between loneliness and healthcare utilisation remains poorly understood. This paper presents a protocol for a scoping review designed to systematically map the existing evidence on the experiences of these patients and the perspectives of the clinicians who care for them.

This scoping review will be conducted following the Arksey and O’Malley methodological framework in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). The findings will be reported according to the Extension to the PRISMA Statement for Reporting Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews (PRISMA-S; see ). A comprehensive search will be performed across five electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, CNKI) and grey literature sources. Studies published in English or Chinese that address loneliness or social isolation in the ED context, from the perspective of adult or paediatric patients or clinical staff, will be included. A novel, artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted screening process will be utilised for initial relevance assessment, followed by full manual screening and data extraction by two independent reviewers to ensure rigour and mitigate bias. Findings will be synthesised using a narrative approach and thematic analysis to identify key concepts, themes and existing gaps in the literature.

As this study synthesises data from previously published literature, it does not require formal ethical approval. The findings will be disseminated through a manuscript submitted to a peer-reviewed, open-access journal. The aim is to provide an evidence-based roadmap to guide future research, inform policy and support the development of interventions designed to improve care and outcomes for this vulnerable population within the acute care setting.

The review has been registered at Open Science Framework, DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/MBVSR.

Acute febrile illness is a major cause of morbidity and healthcare seeking in sub-Saharan Africa, including Mozambique. However, few studies have explored the perceptions and practices related to clinical management of acute febrile illness. Our aim was to understand the perceptions, knowledge and practices of healthcare professionals and community members regarding the management of acute febrile illness.

A qualitative study was conducted using a thematic analysis approach. Eight focus group discussions (FGDs) and three in-depth interviews (IDIs) were conducted in two Mozambican provinces across four healthcare facilities. Purposive sampling was used to select participants, comprising both healthcare professionals and community members. Data were analysed thematically through manual coding, applying inductive and deductive approaches, in line with established qualitative analytical frameworks.

The study included a total of 60 participants, 28 healthcare professionals who participated in FGDs (25) and IDIs (3) and 32 community members who participated in FGDs. Major causes of fever, according to healthcare professionals, were upper and lower respiratory infections, malaria, diarrhoeal diseases and COVID-19. The diagnostic approach for febrile patients primarily included screening, malaria testing and other non-specific investigations depending on availability at health facilities. Antibiotics and antipyretics were the most commonly prescribed treatments. The healthcare professionals reported a decrease in prescribing antimalarials due to extensive training on malaria case management. In contrast, community members reported relying primarily on home-based and traditional practices to treat acute febrile illness before seeking care at health facilities. These practices are related to sociocultural habits, such as the use of traditional medicine and self-medication. The main barriers to seeking care at health facilities were the perception of poor quality of care, long waiting times, cultural beliefs and lack of medicines.

Proper management of non-malarial febrile illness remains a major challenge for both healthcare professionals and communities. Training, adherence to case management protocols and efforts to change behaviours to mitigate harmful sociocultural practices are urgently necessary to improve febrile illness management.

To examine whether exposure to anti-herpetic drugs (AHDs: acyclovir, valacyclovir, famciclovir) is associated with reduced risk of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) treatment initiation.

Population-based retrospective matched cohort study.

University Groningen community pharmacy database IADB.nl, covering approximately 125 Dutch pharmacies (1994–2024).

262 757 adults aged 50–80 years without prior dementia or AD treatment. Exposed individuals with antiherpetic prescriptions (n=23 887) were matched 1:10 to unexposed controls (n=238 870) by age, sex and calendar time.

AHDs: acyclovir, valacyclovir, famciclovir.

Initiation of AD drug treatment, defined as at least two prescriptions for rivastigmine, donepezil, galantamine or memantine within 1 year. Cox proportional hazards models estimated HRs with 95% CIs, adjusted for comorbidities and medications. Analyses were stratified by period (1994–2018 vs 2019–2024) and drug type.

During follow-up, 2495 participants initiated AD treatment. The age of the participants was 65 (SD 9), and 59% were female. Any AHD exposure was associated with 90% reduced hazard of AD treatment (HR 0.09, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.13, p

AHD exposure was consistently associated with markedly lower risk of AD treatment initiation, with similar findings observed in recent years. These findings support the hypothesis that herpesvirus reactivation may contribute to AD pathogenesis and suggest antiviral therapy could have preventive implications. Confirmation through prospective studies and randomised trials is needed.

Emerging evidence supports a role for interleukin 6 (IL-6), a pro-inflammatory cytokine, in the pathogenesis of treatment-resistant major depressive disorder (TRD). However, interventional studies targeting IL-6 in this population remain scarce. Tocilizumab is a humanised monoclonal antibody that inhibits IL-6 signalling and is approved for the treatment of autoimmune conditions such as rheumatoid arthritis. The primary objective of this study is to examine whether IL-6 inhibition via tocilizumab can impact depressive symptoms, inflammation-related biomarkers and cognition in patients with TRD. A secondary objective is to compare the biological profiles of patients with TRD with elevated inflammation to those of healthy controls.

This is a proof-of-concept, randomised, parallel-group, triple-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. 22 adult outpatients diagnosed with TRD and evidence of low-grade inflammation (serum C reactive protein≥3 mg/L) will be randomised (1:1) to receive either one intravenous infusion of tocilizumab (8 mg/kg; maximum 800 mg) or normal saline, administered as an add-on to their ongoing treatment. Psychiatric, cognitive and biomarker assessments will be performed at baseline and at follow-up visits on days 7, 14 and 28 post-infusion. Additionally, 10 healthy controls with no psychiatric history will undergo the same baseline assessments for biomarker comparison.

The study has been approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (Project number: 2025-0245, CAAE: 88904825.7.0000.5327). Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, scientific meetings and, on request, lay summaries for participants.

NCT07052058.

An affordable heart-healthy dietary approach is essential for the management of familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH); however, the optimal dietary pattern and the role of adjunctive nutrient supplementation remain uncertain. This study aims to evaluate the effects of the Brazilian Cardioprotective Diet (DICA Br), adapted from the Portfolio Diet, with or without phytosterol and/or krill oil supplementation in individuals with probable or definite FH according to the Dutch Lipid Clinic Network (Dutch MEDPED) criteria.

The DICA-FH study is a national, multicentre, randomised, factorial, parallel-group, superiority, placebo-controlled clinical trial with a 1:1:1:1 allocation ratio. Participants aged ≥16 years receiving age-appropriate lipid-lowering therapy will be randomised into four groups: (1) adapted cardioprotective diet (DICA-FH) plus phytosterol placebo and krill oil placebo; (2) DICA-FH plus phytosterol 2 g/day and krill oil placebo; (3) DICA-FH plus phytosterol placebo and krill oil 2 g/day or (4) DICA-FH plus phytosterol 2 g/day and krill oil 2 g/day. All participants will undergo whole-genome sequencing and receive appropriate genetic counselling. Primary outcomes will be means of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and lipoprotein(a) levels after 120 days. Secondary outcomes will include additional lipid biomarkers, adherence to protocol and adverse events. The planned sample size is 300 participants. Follow-up is expected to conclude in July 2026.

This study was registered under CAAE 65549622.2.1001.0060 and received ethical approval from the Hcor Research Ethics Committee (approval number 5.805.072) and the Brazilian National Research Ethics Commission (CONEP; approval number 6.864.951). Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants prior to enrolment. The study findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, scientific conferences and channels aimed at the general public.

NCT06331195.

Digital health interventions (DHIs) show considerable promise in supporting hypertension self-management by promoting preventative care and self-monitoring. While their efficacy is increasingly evident, the long-term uptake, acceptance and sustained engagement with these tools are frequently challenged by issues such as usability, trust and varying user experiences. This review aims to synthesise qualitative evidence to identify barriers and facilitators and the key factors that impact the adoption, acceptance and engagement with DHIs for hypertension self-management.

Systematic review of qualitative literature using thematic analysis following Cochrane’s qualitative and implementation methods guidance.

PubMed, PsycInfo, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library were searched in February 2025.

The searches included relevant qualitative and mixed-methods studies on the use of digital devices for hypertension management, which described the barriers and facilitators associated with these tools. We included studies published from 2015 to 2025 to capture relevant evidence. Only studies published in English with a qualitative approach were included.

From an initial 10 943 identified publications, 15 met our inclusion criteria, primarily originating from Europe and the USA, exploring diverse racial and ethnic group experiences. Our thematic synthesis revealed 7 analytical and 22 descriptive themes detailing barriers and facilitators encountered by patients with hypertension, healthcare providers (HCPs) and caregivers. These themes covered technology utilisation, design components, linguistic and cultural relevance, healthcare factors, trust and credibility and interpersonal interactions.

Our analysis underscores that factors such as the usability, design and relevance of social support profoundly influence the uptake and acceptance of DHIs in hypertension self-management among patients, caregivers and HCPs.

CRD42023480389.

This study aimed to determine the associations between adherence to the 24-hour movement guidelines and symptoms of anxiety and depression among Colombian university students.

Cross-sectional study.

1125 individuals (mean age 20.2±2.5 years; 56.7% female).

Students sampled from a single public university.

Participants completed validated self-report instruments: the International Physical Activity Questionnaire-Short Form to assess physical activity (PA), sedentary behaviour (SB) and the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index to assess sleep duration. Symptoms of depression and anxiety were measured using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, with a score of ≥11 used to classify elevated symptoms. Binary logistic regression models were used to estimate associations between adherence to the 24-hour movement guidelines (meeting all three, two, one or none) and mental health outcomes, adjusting for potential confounders.

Only 15.5% of students met all three components of the 24-hour movement guidelines. Meeting a greater number of components was significantly associated with lower odds of depressive and anxiety symptoms. In fully adjusted analyses, students who met all three guidelines were less likely to report anxiety symptoms (OR=0.26; 95%CI 0.13 to 0.54) and depressive symptoms (OR=0.42; 95%CI 0.22 to 0.79) compared with those who met none. Among individual behaviours, sufficient PA and adequate sleep were independently associated with lower odds of both outcomes, whereas high SB was associated with higher odds of elevated symptoms.

In this cross-sectional study, adherence to a greater number of 24-hour movement guideline components was associated with lower levels of anxiety and depressive symptoms in a graded manner. However, the cross-sectional design precludes inference regarding directionality or causality, and bidirectional associations or residual confounding remain possible. Longitudinal and interventional studies are needed to determine whether integrated daily movement behaviours influence mental health outcomes in young adults, particularly in Latin American populations.

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a common and effective procedure for end-stage knee osteoarthritis, yet patients frequently encounter a complex and dynamic symptom experience during the initial period that can significantly impact their rehabilitation and quality of life. This study aimed to explore the symptom experience of patients within 6 weeks after TKA.

A longitudinal qualitative study using semi-structured interviews.

This study was conducted in an orthopaedics department of a tertiary general hospital in China.

Interviews were conducted with 16 patients at 3–5 days postoperatively, 14 patients at 2 weeks postoperatively and 10 patients at 6 weeks postoperatively.

Data were collected between July 2024 and November 2024. A purposive sampling method was used to recruit patients. Data were analysed using directed content analysis, with data collection and analysis performed concurrently.

Three themes and nine subthemes were identified: (1) symptom perception, including perceived complexity of symptoms, self-identity conflict due to functional limitations, activation of negative emotions and psychological adaptation and interaction and amplification effects among symptoms; (2) symptom evaluation, characterised by the dynamic cognitive reframing of symptom meaning, self-blame tendency and internalisation of responsibility and interference from social and medical information; (3) symptom coping, involving dynamic evolution of active coping strategies and self-efficacy reinforcement, temporal characteristics of passive coping patterns and rehabilitation barriers.

The symptom experience of patients who had TKA is complex and dynamic. Healthcare providers should implement tailored interventions based on patients’ symptom experiences at different stages to facilitate symptom management, alleviate distress and negative emotions and improve quality of life.

Sexually transmitted infections (STIs) have emerged as significant public health concerns, imposing a substantial burden on both individuals and the healthcare system of the country. Additionally, STIs may also result in major extensive psychological consequences that profoundly affect individuals with STIs. Despite the government’s implementation of different initiatives aimed at addressing STI-related challenges, these conditions are associated with shame and stigma which act as barriers to the effective utilisation of healthcare services. The purpose of the present study is to generate evidence on barriers and facilitators to service utilisation and management of STIs in India.

Indian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi, is conducting a multi-centre study employing a mixed-method approach. The study involves different levels of healthcare systems, including both government and private healthcare facilities across seven sites in several states of India, including Maharashtra, Rajasthan, Punjab, Bihar, Uttar Pradesh and New Delhi. For the quantitative data, individuals seeking healthcare services related to STIs will be enrolled and assessed using a semi-structured pilot-tested questionnaire. In-depth interviews and focus group discussions will also be conducted with different stakeholders as per the standard guidelines of the qualitative method by the designated trained project staff. Descriptive and inferential statistics will be applied to the quantitative data, while the qualitative data will be analysed using a deductive approach with thematic content analysis.

The study protocol has been approved by the ethics review committees of all the participating sites individually. The findings from this study will be published in peer-reviewed journals and disseminated through scientific conferences and meetings among policy-makers and government agencies. AIIMS/IEC/2024/609; AIIMS/Pat/IEC/2024/1205; F. 7/BIOETHICS/AIIMS-RBL/APPROEM/2021/1; KIMSDU/IEC/11/2022; LHMC/IEC/2024/11; IEC/02/EX/2024; PGI/IEC/2024EIC000373.

To map and synthesise existing evidence on pregnant women’s perceptions and experiences of social media communication for antenatal care (ANC).

Scoping review.

Four electronic databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science and Google Scholar) alongside ‘grey’ and supplementary searches were conducted between December 202–January 2026.

All studies reporting pregnant women’s perceptions or experiences of social media communication for ANC.

Data were extracted independently by two reviewers using a structured charting framework. Extracted data were synthesised using a descriptive and narrative approach, with pregnant women’s perceptions and experiences analysed through reflexive thematic analysis.

Six studies met the inclusion criteria. Across platforms including WhatsApp, Facebook, Instagram and WeChat, pregnant women generally perceived social media communication as acceptable and beneficial, particularly for accessing trustworthy information, reassurance between visits, peer support and flexible engagement. Experiences varied by platform, moderation model and context. Key challenges included limited personalisation, variability in moderators’ capacity and responsiveness, digital literacy barriers, data affordability, privacy concerns and sociocultural influences. Equity-related considerations were recurrent, highlighting the potential for uneven experiences if digital communication is not carefully designed and standardised.

Social media communication is generally experienced positively by pregnant women as a complement to routine ANC, particularly when professionally moderated and responsive to women’s informational needs. However, variability in experiences and equity-related challenges underscore the need for further research and careful implementation. This scoping review provides a preliminary mapping of the evidence and identifies priorities for future qualitative synthesis, primary research and the development of inclusive, person-centred digital ANC communication strategies.

Patients on low-dose prednisolone may develop adrenal insufficiency causing reduced health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and increased risk of adrenal crisis. This study examines whether supplemental hydrocortisone during mild to moderate stress improves HRQoL in patients with polymyalgia rheumatica/giant cell arteritis (PMR/GCA) with adrenal insufficiency on low-dose prednisolone.

A multicentre, randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, clinical trial including patients with PMR/GCA receiving ongoing prednisolone ≤5 mg/day. Eligible patients undergo an adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) test, and 250 patients with a stimulated cortisol

The study is approved by the Ethics Committee of the Capital Region of Denmark and the Danish Medicines Agency. Recruitment began June 2022. The last patient’s last visit is expected in 2026. Results will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publication and conference presentations.

EudraCT:2021-002528-18, CTIS:2024-518272-30-00, NCT05435781.

To prospectively assess pregnancy-related care sought and obstacles and stress experienced by newly pregnant people.

The ADAPT Study, a longitudinal cohort study, followed 2015 non-pregnant participants aged 15–34 years for a year. Those with confirmed incident pregnancies were followed through their pregnancies and for 3 years.

We recruited participants from 23 reproductive and primary care facilities located in five southwestern states with different sociopolitical reproductive health contexts (restrictive, Arizona and West Texas; protective, southeastern California, Nevada and New Mexico).

334 people reported a new pregnancy within 1 year of enrolment; 324 with outcome data are included in this analysis.

Types of pregnancy care sought (‘Have you looked into where or how you could get (prenatal care, abortion care or adoption services)?’) and care-seeking stress (‘How stressful was it to find (prenatal, abortion or adoption) care for this pregnancy?’).

Most participants (83%, 270/324) sought prenatal care; 43% (138/324) sought abortion care; and 5% (17/324) sought adoption services. Overall, 17%, 29% and 23%, respectively, reported that care-seeking was extremely/quite a bit stressful. Abortion care-seeking was associated with significantly more stress than seeking prenatal care in the ordinal (adjusted odds ratio (aOR 1.70, 95% CI 1.10 to 2.62) but not logistic (aOR 1.33, 95% CI 0.74 to 2.38) model. Adoption care-seeking stress did not differ from prenatal care-seeking stress in either model. Participants who experienced any type of abortion care-seeking obstacle and those recruited in a state with a restrictive policy environment (aOR 2.72, 95% CI 1.09 to 6.80) reported more care-seeking stress than their counterparts.

People who seek pregnancy care often experience some care-seeking stress, regardless of the type of care they seek. Findings point to the need to reduce the burden of the pregnancy care-seeking process across all types of pregnancy care.

NCT03888404.

This study aimed to investigate the association of the triglyceride-glucose (TyG) index with the risk of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and all-cause mortality in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD), and to inspect whether AMI mediates the relationship between TyG index and mortality.

A large-scale, retrospective cohort study.

This single-centre study was conducted at a tertiary academic hospital in South China. The association between the TyG index and AMI was assessed using multivariable logistic regression, with progressive adjustment for demographic and clinical covariates. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the HRs for all-cause mortality associated with TyG index. Restricted cubic splines and mediation analysis were employed to examine non-linear relationships and the mediating role of AMI.

A total of 20 125 patients diagnosed with CAD during hospitalisation between January 2020 and February 2025 were initially enrolled. After applying exclusion criteria (insufficient data), 18 245 participants were included in the final analysis.

We examined the association of the TyG index with the risk of AMI, as well as its association with all-cause mortality across different CAD subgroups.

The association between the TyG index and all-cause mortality was significantly modified by AMI status (P for interaction

An elevated TyG index independently predicts the risk of AMI in patients with CAD. Its prognostic value for mortality, however, is critically dependent on the presence of AMI: while a higher TyG index is associated with increased mortality in patients with AMI, moderately elevated TyG levels (Q2–Q3) are associated with lower mortality, whereas the highest quartile shows no significant association. Mediation analysis further reveals that AMI significantly mediates the association between TyG index and mortality, highlighting the importance of AMI prevention in mitigating the adverse prognostic impact of insulin resistance in the CAD population. These findings warrant validation in prospective studies.

To explore the impact of acute worsening events (AWEs), defined as clinically relevant deteriorations in peak expiratory flow, reliever use and/or symptoms, on patients’ daily lives and identify behaviours linked to their recognition and management.

A qualitative international substudy was conducted in the Netherlands, Spain, the USA, Canada and the UK (2023–2024).

19 patients with moderate-to-severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) from a randomised clinical trial participated. Interviews, triggered by AWEs and repeated 6 weeks later, were audio-recorded, transcribed and analysed.

Patients varied in identifying bad days, reporting inability to perform physical activities, symptom worsening or the need for add-on treatment. Recognition of AWEs depended on their duration: shorter events (

AWEs significantly impact daily life but vary widely in recognition and thresholds for seeking care. Limited awareness of daily disease variations may contribute to both under-reporting of worsening events to healthcare providers and suboptimal self-management in COPD.

NCT05492877.

The aim of this study was to translate the Attitudes and Beliefs about Cardiovascular Disease (ABCD) Risk Questionnaire into Norwegian and assess its psychometric properties among individuals with a history of myocardial infarction.

The study adopted a cross-sectional design. The original questionnaire was translated into Norwegian and adapted for use in the target population. The Norwegian version was pilot tested in a sample of patients and then validated in the target population.

Norway, using a web-based solution to collect data.

A random sample of Norwegian individuals

Internal consistency was tested using Cronbach’s α and test–retest reliability using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Difficulty and discrimination indices were determined for the Knowledge scale. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was used to assess structural validity of the Risk scale.

Data for 746 participants (mean age, SD: 66.4, 10.3 years), of which 26.9% females were analysed. The Norwegian version showed satisfactory internal consistency (Cronbach’s α 0.73–0.79) but modest test–retest reliability (ICC 0.35–0.64). The Knowledge scale showed moderate difficulty (0.39–0.84) and good discrimination power (0.44–0.60). The one-factor model CFA for each scale achieved acceptable fit, and the four-factor model showed moderate fit (root mean square error of approximation=0.05, standardised root mean squared residual=0.07, Comparative Fit Index=0.91, Tucker-Lewis Index=0.88).

The Norwegian translated ABCD Risk Questionnaire demonstrated satisfactory psychometric properties and can be considered a useful instrument for assessing knowledge and risk perception among individuals with a history of myocardial infarction.

Genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM) is a chronic, oestrogen-deficient condition that is frequently underdiagnosed and undertreated. Although low-dose vaginal estriol improves epithelial trophism and microbial balance, a substantial proportion of women report persistent symptoms. High-quality randomised evidence evaluating combined therapeutic strategies remains scarce. Energy-based modalities, including the erbium:YAG (Er:YAG) laser (=2940 nm), have been proposed as adjunctive treatments. This trial aims to assess the efficacy of Er:YAG laser therapy combined with vaginal estriol compared with estriol alone in postmenopausal women with GSM.

This is a single-centre, randomised, double-blind, controlled clinical trial. Postmenopausal women aged 45–70 years with vaginal pH ≥5.0 and at least one moderate GSM symptom (Visual Analogue Scale ≥4) will be eligible. Exclusion criteria include current systemic or local hormone therapy, previous vaginal energy-based treatment, abnormal cervical cytology and body mass index ≥35 kg/m². All participants will receive vaginal estriol cream (0.5 mg per dose) daily for 14 days, followed by twice-weekly administration for 16 weeks. Participants will be randomised (1:1) to receive either estriol plus sham Er:YAG laser or estriol plus active Er:YAG laser. Three laser sessions will be delivered at approximately 4-week intervals. Assessments will occur at baseline, monthly during treatment and 4 months after the final session. The primary outcome is the Vulvovaginal Health Index, with the primary endpoint defined as the change from baseline to 4 months post-treatment, reflecting sustained effect. Secondary outcomes include GSM symptom severity, vaginal microbiome composition (16S rRNA sequencing), quality of life (Menopause Rating Scale) and sexual function (Female Sexual Function Index). Data will be analysed using repeated-measures analysis of variance or appropriate non-parametric tests, with significance set at p

Ethical approval has been obtained from the Human Research Ethics Committee of UNINOVE. Written informed consent will be obtained. Findings will be disseminated via peer-reviewed journals and scientific meetings.

NCT06873971.

Postextubation swallowing disorders (SD) are common in the intensive care unit (ICU) and are associated with severe complications, including aspiration pneumonia, a three-fold increase in reintubation risk and higher mortality. While fibreoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) and videofluoroscopy are gold standards for diagnosis, they are often impractical or impossible to perform on intubated patients. The use of ultrasound offers a non-invasive, bedside alternative to evaluate the musculoskeletal structures involved in swallowing. The Echographie Identifier les troubles de Déglutition Acquis en Réanimation (EIDAR) study aims to evaluate the diagnostic performance of pre-extubation ultrasound in identifying patients at risk of SD following mechanical ventilation.

This prospective, monocentric diagnostic study conducted at the Dijon University Hospital ICU will include 100 adult patients ventilated for ≥48 hours. The primary outcome is the presence of SD, defined as a Penetration-Aspiration Scale score >2 during a FEES procedure performed 3 to 24 hours postextubation and independently assessed by an otolaryngologist blinded to index test results. Pre-extubation cervical ultrasound (Index Test) will be performed within 3 hours prior to extubation and measure hyoid bone ascension (primary variable of interest), geniohyoid muscle surface area and digastric muscle cross-sectional area. The diagnostic performance of cervical ultrasonographic parameters will be assessed using their discriminative capacity via a receiver operating characteristic curve. The feasibility of the ultrasound procedure in a critical care setting will also be assessed.

The study received a favourable opinion from the independent ethics committee CPP Ouest III and is registered with the French health authority ANSM (national agency on safety in medicine and health products). It is conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and Good Clinical Practice guidelines. Participants or their proxies provide free and informed oral consent. Results will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed medical journals and presented at international conferences.

RCB 2023-A00461-44 and NCT05922085

Access to musculoskeletal healthcare services in Sub-Saharan Africa is inadequate. As osteoarthritis is the most prevalent chronic osteoarticular disease globally, it’s essential to understand its social and economic impact, as well as the determinants of inequities in access to healthcare services in Sub-Saharan Africa. The absence of systematised knowledge on this topic makes this review pertinent. However, due to data scarcity, assessing this burden is challenging. The objective of this scoping review is to map and summarise the available literature up to 2025 on the socioeconomic burden and health inequity determinants among the Sub-Saharan African population with osteoarthritis.

A predefined search strategy will be applied to MEDLINE (via PubMed), Embase, African Journals Online and African Index Medicus to incorporate articles relevant to adults diagnosed with osteoarthritis who are residents of sub-Saharan Africa. We will also include grey literature sources such as Google Scholar, Research Square, manuals, books, medical society websites, secondary databases, theses and dissertation repositories and conference proceedings. Study selection will be conducted in two stages by a pair of reviewers who will independently screen titles and abstracts according to the eligibility criteria, followed by a full-text review of the selected studies. The search period was from October 2025 to January 2026. Data extraction will be performed using a standardised charting form developed by the review team.

This scoping review maps evidence on OA-related socioeconomic impacts and healthcare inequities in Sub-Saharan Africa. As a secondary data analysis, ethical approval is not required. Findings will be disseminated via peer-reviewed journals and academic conferences to clinicians and policymakers.

To identify subgroups with similar social determinants of health (SDOH) characteristics using latent class analysis (LCA) and examine their associations with physical and mental health, cognitive function and missed workdays at 3 and 6 months post-SARS-CoV-2 infection. We hypothesised that intersecting SDOH factors would differentially influence COVID-19-related health outcomes across subgroups.

Prospective cohort study from the Innovative Support for Patients with SARS-CoV-2 Infections Registry (INSPIRE), with longitudinal data collection and cross-sectional analyses at baseline, 3-month and 6-month follow-ups.

Multicentre registry across eight US academic medical centres (Chicago, Dallas, Houston, Los Angeles, New Haven, Philadelphia, San Francisco and Seattle).

Adults aged ≥18 years, fluent in English or Spanish, with self-reported acute COVID-19 symptoms and a confirmed positive SARS-CoV-2 test within 42 days before enrolment (9 December 2020 to 12 August 2022), and access to an internet-connected device. Exclusions included incarceration, inability to provide informed consent, lack of confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection or no internet access. Of 3791 eligible participants with complete baseline data, 2897 (76.4%) completed the 3-month follow-up and 2666 (70.3%) completed the 6-month follow-up; most were aged 18–49 years (74–75%), female (66–67%), white (86.6–87.5%) and non-Hispanic (86.6–87.5%).

Prespecified primary outcomes were physical and mental health (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-29 V.2.1 T-scores for depression, anxiety, fatigue, sleep disturbance, pain interference, physical function and social participation), cognitive function (PROMIS Cognitive Function Short Form 8 T-scores) and missed workdays due to illness (binary: >1 week vs ≤1 week, from a single-item survey). All measures were self-reported and collected at baseline, 3 months and 6 months; no changes from protocol.

LCA identified a 4-class model as optimal (lowest Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) after evaluating 1–7 class models; significant demographic differences (² p

In this US prospective cohort, SDOH-based subgroups showed persistent disparities in health outcomes post-SARS-CoV-2 infection. Findings highlight the urgent need for intersectional approaches to address systemic inequities in post-COVID-19 recovery.

NCT04610515.

Preserved Ratio Impaired Spirometry (PRISm) is a new spirometric entity defined in international guidelines, associated with overall worse outcomes. It remains unclear whether this represents a distinct entity or an early phase of multiple other diseases, such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and restrictive lung diseases. There is a notable scarcity of data on PRISm, particularly in Lebanon. This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of PRISm and COPD, and their associated factors, among individuals aged 40 years and above who underwent spirometry in a single university medical centre between 2022 and 2024.

Outpatient Pulmonary Function Tests Laboratory at a Lebanese university medical centre.

All individuals aged 40 years or older who performed spirometry between 2022 and 2024

A retrospective analysis of pulmonary function tests (PFTs) and demographics was performed. Patients were classified based on the spirometry patterns that are consistent with COPD (forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV₁)/forced vital capacity (FVC)1/FVC≥0.7 and FEV₁1/FVC≥0.7 and FEV₁≥80%). A small number of PFTs did not meet the above criteria and were classified as ‘others’; they were excluded from the main analysis but retained for descriptive estimation of PRISm and COPD prevalence over the past 3 years. The prevalence and associated risk factors of PRISm and COPD were assessed. Descriptive, bivariate and multinomial regression models were performed using IBM’s Statistical Package for the Social Sciences V.29.

A total of 698 PFTs were performed for 639 patients. The prevalence of PRISm and COPD in the centre between 2022 and 2024 was 11% and 17%, respectively. Compared with normal PFTs, subjects with PRISm were older (adjusted OR; aOR (95% CI)=1.03 (1.002 to 1.05); p=0.03) and more likely to be ex-smokers (aOR=2.19 (1.12 to 4.30); p=0.022); patients with COPD were older (aOR 1.09 (1.07 to 1.12); p

These findings highlight PRISm as a potentially relevant pattern within chronic airway disease. Within the context of Sustainable Development Goal 3 on non-communicable diseases, they underscore the importance of identifying this subgroup for closer clinical attention. Further longitudinal and multicentre studies are needed to better understand the clinical significance of PRISm and its relationship to chronic airway diseases.