Conectar
Chronic venous insufficiency (CVI) is a chronic lower limb progressive disorder with significant burden. Graduated compression therapy is the gold-standard treatment, but its underutilisation, as indicated in recent literature, may be contributing to the growing burden of CVI. The aim of this systematic review is to determine the reasons for poor compliance in patients who are prescribed graduated compression therapy in the management of chronic venous insufficiency. A systematic review of the literature was conducted to identify the reasons for non-compliance in wearing graduated compression therapy in the management of chronic venous insufficiency. The keyword search was conducted through Medline, PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane library, AMED, and Embase databases from 2000 to April 2023. Qualitative and quantitative studies were included with no study design or language limits imposed on the search. The study populations were restricted to adults aged over 18 years, diagnosed with chronic venous insufficiency. Of the 856 studies found, 80 full-text articles were reviewed, with 14 being eligible for the review. Due to the variability in study designs, the results were summarised rather than subjected to meta-analysis. There are five main overarching themes for non-compliance, which are physical limitations, health literacy, discomfort, financial issues, and psychosocial issues with emerging sub-themes. Graduated compression therapy has the potential to reduce the burden of chronic venous insufficiency if patients are more compliant with their prescription.
In 2018, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists recommended low-dose aspirin to prevent the onset of pre-eclampsia among women who were at high risk. Factors influencing women’s acceptance of this recommendation span multiple sectors and levels. Understanding how these factors interact will help stakeholders design effective population-level intervention strategies. Our study aims to identify and map relationships among factors influencing the medication decisions of pregnant women at risk of hypertensive disorders.
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines will be followed for this review. A research librarian developed a comprehensive search strategy to retrieve published and unpublished English studies after 1 January 1980, involving factors that influence pregnant women’s uptake and adherence to medication for gestational hypertensive disorders. This literature includes perceptions, patterns, acceptance, refusal, tendencies, probability and service utilisation. We will search PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and CINAHL. Reference lists of the selected papers will be searched manually to identify more relevant studies. A two-stage independent screening, consisting of title and abstract screening, followed by full-text screening, will be conducted by two independent reviewers to identify eligible articles. Extracted data will be recorded in a customised variable extraction form and input into a Microsoft Access database. The PRISMA-ScR will be used to guide the presentation of the results, which will be presented in a table and causal map to demonstrate the relationships between extracted variables and medication uptake and adherence. A conceptual simulation model will be formulated to validate the logic of the relationships between variables and identify knowledge gaps. Lastly, experts and stakeholders will be invited to critique and comment on the results.
This study does not require ethical approval. The full review results will be presented at a relevant conference and submitted to a peer-reviewed scientific journal for publication.
The objective of this study is to investigate early-to-late postdoctoral clinical academic progression and the experiences of NIHR Clinical Lectureship (CL) fellows, considering enablers and barriers to success, and identifying the factors associated with immediate progression to a clinical academic role following completion of the award.
Datasets of CL awardees across the UK.
For semistructured interviews, n=40 CL awardees that had finished their award within the previous 5 years. For quantitative analysis, n=1226 completed or currently active CL awardees.
The responses from the semistructured interviews to the defined questions on experiences during the award, postaward progression, and enablers and barriers to academic progression. Other primary outcome measures were quantitative data on first destinations postaward, demographic data, and whether an awardee had previously held an NIHR Academic Clinical Fellowship (ACF) or was a recipient of the Academy of Medical Sciences (AMS) Starter Grant.
CL awardees identified numerous benefits to the award, with the majority achieving their aims. Most awardees progressed to a clinical academic role; however, some returned to a clinical only position, citing concerns around the time pressure associated with balancing clinical and academic responsibilities, and the competition to attain further postdoctoral awards. The region of the award partnership, year of award end and success in applying for an AMS Starter Grant were associated with progression to a clinical academic role. Gender, holding an ACF and having a craft or non-craft specialty had no independent statistical association with clinical academic progression.
The CL is a valued element of the Integrated Academic Pathway. By addressing issues around later postdoctoral progression opportunities, responding to challenges experienced by CLs, and by understanding the factors identified in this study associated with clinical academic progression, it should be possible to increase the proportion of CLs that become fully independent clinical academic research leaders.
1226 NIHR CLs active or completed on the award between 2006 and 2020.
FreshRSS 