Urgent and emergency care (UEC) systems in England face unprecedented pressures, with record accident and emergency attendances, persistent breaches of ambulance response targets and poorer outcomes for time-sensitive conditions. National UEC recovery plans have introduced multiple innovations—such as same-day emergency care, virtual wards and specialty hubs—to manage these pressures and improve patient flow. Rural coastal areas are particularly vulnerable to excessive demand due to higher levels of deprivation, older populations with complex health needs, seasonal surges that generate unpredictable demand and challenges in attracting and retaining staff. Following the Chief Medical Officer’s 2021 Annual Report, funding research and developing bespoke solutions to manage UEC demand and address geographical disparities has been recognised as a national priority. The Elevate study responds to this priority by identifying and evaluating innovative models of UEC in rural coastal communities in England.

The Elevate study is a 30-month, mixed-methods evaluation that comprises three interlinked work packages: (1) National service mapping—outlining provision of innovative models of UEC in rural coastal areas of England. This will be developed through document review and interviews with regional and national service leaders. (2) Quantitative analysis—quasiexperimental and longitudinal approaches will use National Health Service (NHS) England’s Emergency Care Data Set and linked routine NHS datasets to evaluate the impact of UEC models on health and process outcomes. Standard and bespoke metrics will be developed and used to assess performance. (3) Qualitative case studies—up to 12 case studies of UEC models in rural coastal communities. Interviews with patients and staff and non-participant observation will explore how and why different UEC models influence patient experience, clinical outcomes, resource use and the workforce. Findings will be integrated using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research to identify components of UEC models that are effective, scalable and sensitive to local context,

Ethical approval for qualitative components was granted by the North of Scotland Research Ethics Committee (25/NS/0099). Dissemination will include peer-reviewed publications, policy briefs, creative media and community engagement activities to ensure findings are communicated inclusively and effectively to policymakers, health and social care practitioners and the public.

Research Registry (researchregistry11126).

Value-based healthcare (VBHC) strives to improve the healthcare system by focusing on value of care, that is, patient relevant outcomes relative to the costs for achieving these outcomes. Within VBHC, patient participation is crucial to identify patient relevant outcomes and value improvement potential. However, patient participation in VBHC initiatives remains limited. Therefore, we aimed to improve patient participation within VBHC teams with the ultimate aim to develop a practical guide for patient participation in VBHC.

An action research study.

This study was conducted in seven collaborating Dutch hospitals from March 2023 to November 2024.

Seven VBHC teams were selected to participate in the cyclical action research steps, that is, orientation, planning, implementation, and evaluation, in which patient participation was implemented or improved. These included the following patient groups: prostate cancer, vulnerable elderly, breast cancer, diabetes, maternity care, colorectal cancer and chronic kidney disease.

Both qualitative and quantitative data were collected. Qualitative data included observations and minutes of meetings with the intervention teams. Quantitative data included responses to the Public and Patient Engagement Evaluation Tool (PPEET) by multiple members of the intervention (n=7) and control teams (n=94) at three time points (T1=6 months, T2=12 months, T3=end of study). Qualitative data were thematically analysed and quantitative data were analysed descriptively. Finally, the data were triangulated to create an overview of lessons learnt in improving patient participation.

Patient participation goals varied across teams, leading to diverse actions, such as establishing a diabetes patient panel and distributing questionnaires to patients with colorectal cancer. PPEET results show that 71% of intervention team members reported that patient participation had an impact on the team’s outcomes compared with 44% in control teams (T3). Furthermore, 80% of the intervention team members initially wanted training in patient participation (T1), which dropped to 29% at T3. Overall, 22 lessons in improving patient participation in multidisciplinary project teams were identified and compiled into a practical guide.

The action research process improved the process and impact of patient participation in the intervention teams. Furthermore, the results indicate that the action research process enhanced the team members’ knowledge and skills on patient participation. The practical guide developed in this study can be used to support implementation of patient participation in VBHC.

Deaths related to drug overdose and suicide in the USA have increased 500% and 35%, respectively, over the last two decades. The human and economic costs to society associated with these ‘deaths of despair’ are immense. Great efforts and substantial investments have been made in treatment and prevention, yet these efforts have not abated these increasing trajectories of deaths over time. The COVID-19 pandemic has exacerbated and highlighted these problems. Notably, some geographical areas (eg, Appalachia, farmland) and some communities (eg, low-income persons, ‘essential workers’, minoritised populations) have been disproportionately affected. Risk factors have been identified for substance use and suicide deaths: forms of adversity, neglect, opportunity indexes and trauma. Yet, the biological, psychological and social mechanisms driving risk are not uniform. Notably, most people exposed to risk factors do not become symptomatic and could broadly be considered resilient. Achieving a better understanding of biological, psychological and social mechanisms underlying both pathology and resilience will be crucial for improving approaches for prevention and treatment and creating precision medicine approaches for more efficient and effective treatment.

The State of Ohio Adversity and Resilience (SOAR) study is a prospective, longitudinal, multimodal, integrated familial study designed to identify biological, psychological and social risk and resilience factors and processes leading to mental health disorders, substance use disorders, substance overdose, suicide and associated psychological/medical comorbidities which reduce life expectancy and quality of life. It includes two nested longitudinal samples: (1) WD Survey: an address-based random population epidemiological sample of 15 000 individuals (unique households) representative of the state of Ohio assessed for psychosocial, psychiatric, behavioural health and substance use factors and (2) Brain Health Study: a family-based, multimodal, deep-phenotyping study conducted in 1200 families (up to 3600 persons aged 12–72 years) including MRI, electroencephalography, blood biomarkers and psychiatric diagnostic interviews, as well as neuropsychological, psychosocial functioning and family/community history, dynamics and support assessments. SOAR is designed to discover, develop and deploy advanced predictive analytics and interventions to transform mental health prevention, diagnosis, treatment and recovery.

All participants will provide written informed consent (or parental permission and assent for minors). The study was approved by The Ohio State University Institutional Review Board (study numbers 2023H0316 (Brain Health) and 2023H0350 (Wellness Survey). The Brain Health study was also approved by institutional review boards at each partnering institution involved in conducting participant assessments. Findings will be disseminated to academic peers, clinicians and healthcare consumers, policymakers and the general public, using local and international academic channels (academic journals, evidence briefs and conferences) and outreach (workshops and seminars).

This study aimed to investigate the impact of socioeconomic status and country of origin on COVID-19 outcomes in Swedish intensive care units (ICUs), hypothesising that these factors are independently associated with 90-day mortality.

Registry-based cohort study.

Swedish ICUs, from 6 March 2020 to 31 December 2022.

Adults (≥18 years) with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection and acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure. A total of 5833 patients were included in the multivariable model.

Not applicable.

The primary outcome was 90-day mortality. Secondary outcomes included 1-year mortality and ventilator and renal replacement therapy-free days within 60 days post-ICU admission.

Non-European country of origin was independently associated with higher 90-day and 1-year mortality adjusted OR (aOR) 1.34 [95% CI 1.13 to 1.61], p=0.001, aOR 1.26 [95% CI 1.01 to 1.5], p=0.01, respectively. Socioeconomic variables did not significantly impact mortality or organ support-free days. Other predictors of 90-day mortality included age, sex, chronic heart and lung disease, Simplified Acute Physiology Score 3 score, immunosuppression, time in hospital prior to ICU admission, pandemic wave and admission Partial pressure of oxygen in arterial blood/Fraction of inspired oxygen-ratio.

The study identified significant disparities in COVID-19 outcomes based on country of origin, with non-European patients facing higher mortality risks. These findings could challenge the notion of equitable healthcare in Sweden and underscore the need for further research into systemic inequalities.

To assess atrial fibrillation (AF) burden, symptoms and quality of life (QoL) in endurance athletes with paroxysmal AF.

Prospective cohort study.

Otherwise healthy endurance athletes with paroxysmal AF in Norway, Australia and Belgium. The current study presents baseline measurements collected before the intervention of a randomised controlled trial on effects of individually tailored training adaptation.

AF burden (percentage time in AF) was measured by insertable cardiac monitors (Confirm Rx, Abbott). AF-related symptoms and QoL were assessed using the Atrial Fibrillation Effect on QualiTy-of-Life Questionnaire (AFEQT) with any score

43 athletes (age 57±10 (mean±SD), range 33–75 years, 3 women) were included. The athletes were monitored for 50±18 days. Median AF burden was 0.18% (IQR 0%–2.6%). Out of 29 athletes with at least one AF episode, 21 (72%) had AF episodes >60 min. 13 athletes (30%) had AFEQT overall score 60 min were associated with reduced QoL (mean AFEQT score 78 vs 90, p=0.001 and 78 vs 90, p=0.001, respectively). There were large individual variations between the athletes concerning AF burden, symptoms and QoL.

Although most athletes were still competing, more than half had troublesome symptoms. One-third had reduced QoL, which was associated with higher AF burden and longer duration of AF episodes. Variations between the athletes highlight the need for individually tailored AF management in athletes with paroxysmal AF.

NCT04991337.

To describe self-reported treatment and exercise strategies among patients with long-lasting low back pain (LBP) 1 month after consultation at a specialised hospital-based Medical Spine Clinic and evaluate their associations with changes in pain and disability 1 and 3 months after consultation.

Prospective cohort study using questionnaire data before consultation (baseline) and 1 and 3 months after consultation.

Specialised hospital-based Medical Spine Clinic, Denmark.

1686 patients with long-lasting LBP completed the baseline questionnaire; 908 patients responded at 1 month, of them 623 responded at 3 month.

Patients were categorised by treatment (physiotherapy, chiropractic treatment, physiotherapy+chiropractic treatment and no recommended treatment) and exercise strategy (exercise continued, exercise ceased, exercise initiated and not exercising).

Pain was assessed by the numeric rating scale (NRS: 0–10), and disability was assessed by the Oswestry disability index (ODI: 0–100).

1-month postconsultation, half of the patients received no recommended treatment; most others received physiotherapy (42%). Nearly half of the patients continued exercise, 28% continued to be inactive, and 22% initiated exercise. For the population as a whole, pain changed by –0.74 (95% CI –0.90; –0.58) and –1.02 (95% CI –1.22; –0.83) points on the NRS at 1- and 3-month follow-up, respectively, and disability by –2.65 (95% CI –3.51; –1.78) and –4.48 (95% CI –5.59; –3.38) points on the ODI. Differences between treatment strategies were small. However, the two groups not exercising improved less compared with those who continued exercise when adjusted for age, sex and baseline level (order of magnitude from 0.07 to 1.18 points on the NRS and from 4.01 to 9.08 points on the ODI). For pain, these group differences were statistically significant at 1 month (p

Mean improvement was negligible, with no differences between treatment strategies. However, patients not exercising showed no or less improvement, highlighting the importance of exercise in managing long-lasting LBP.