Conectar
Patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) are measures of patients’ perceptions of care they receive. PREMs are critical in developing and evaluating programmes that aim to improve patient healthcare experiences and quality of care (QoC) according to patient-defined needs. This review aims to map key domains of PREMs across distinct healthcare technical areas and life stages from globally available literature.
A scoping review adapting Arksey and O’Malley’s framework and Joanna Briggs Institute’s guidelines for the conduct of scoping reviews.
Google Scholar, PubMed, WHO, US Academy of Medicine and USAID Momentum.
PREMs literature from electronic repositories of grey and peer-reviewed publications, published in English historically up to September 2023.
Two lead reviewers with support from the technical working group co-created a review framework of healthcare technical areas, life stages and PREMs domains. We screened eligible articles, prioritising reviews except for technical areas with no reviews, where we then selected individual studies. We charted, analysed and synthesised data from 52 eligible articles.
PREMs literature has recently increased, especially in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs), although studies in high-income countries (HICs) dominate in proportion (n=38; 73.1%). Out of 52 eligible articles, technical areas with most publications were sexual and reproductive health (n=21; 40.4%) and general outpatient care (n=11; 21.2%). Studies in adulthood (n=24; 46.2%) and from pregnancy and birth to postnatal (n=16; 30.8%) were most represented. PREMs studies reported mostly on communication and rapport (n=33; 63.5%) and respect and dignity (n=42; 80.8%) domains. Nearly a quarter (n=12; 23.1%) of the articles included only validated tools; the rest included a combination of validated and unvalidated measures. Of the tools relating to life stages of babies, younger children and older adults, the majority (n=17; 94.4%) included patient proxies.
PREMs, as an important component of QoC measurement, are increasing across several healthcare technical areas and life stages with commonalities and notable distinctions in measurement domains and tools. Evidence on PREMs largely comes from HICs. Evidence on critical, yet sometimes overlooked domains, highlights key QoC implementation gaps. The adaptation and utilisation of PREMs in programmes, especially in LMICs and under-represented technical areas, present opportunities to close the QoC disparities in those settings. Strategic, concerted efforts towards the harmonisation of PREMs tools across multiple life course stages and technical areas are critically needed in high-level quality improvement efforts.
To explore the social context of violence for hospital-based and community nurses from different ethnic groups, the types of violence experienced or witnessed both in and outside the workplace, and its impact on mental and physical health.
Cross-sectional, qualitative study using semi-structured interviews.
Semi-structured interviews were conducted online with 12 hospital-based and community nurses recruited from London, England, between May and August 2021. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.
The sample comprised seven hospital nurses and five community nurses. Four themes were identified: (i) the social context in which nurses from different ethnic groups are exposed to community violence; (ii) types of workplace violence experienced or witnessed by hospital-based and community nurses from different ethnic groups; (iii) perceptions of the factors contributing to workplace violence; (iv) impacts of violence on mental and physical health outcomes. Using the social ecological framework and sociological theory of stress, these findings informed a conceptual stress process model of violence exposure for nurses.
Nurses from different ethnic groups are exposed to violence both in and outside the workplace which negatively affects their mental and physical health. Effective violence prevention requires a multi-factorial approach that addresses the social and institutional factors contributing to violence, shifting the focus from individual measures to systemic organisational changes.
The NHS workforce is currently more diverse than ever, and healthcare leaders must improve access to mental health and well-being resources for staff affected by workplace violence, particularly for those who hold multiple social identities at the intersection of ethnicity, gender and age. Prioritising this support is essential not only to safeguard against negative health outcomes but also to improve the recruitment and retention of healthcare professionals.
No patient or public contribution.
Sickle cell disease (SCD) is due to the mutation of haemoglobin (Hb), from HbA to HbS and characterised by recurrent vaso-occlusive crises (VOC), which can progress to acute chest syndrome (ACS), a leading cause of death in adults with SCD. Hypoxia is a key modifiable factor in the polymerisation of HbS and the pathogenesis of VOC. High-flow nasal oxygen (HFNO) delivers humidified gas at high oxygen concentrations and flow rates: the former may reverse sickling (metabolic effect) to accelerate VOC resolution and prevent ACS, while the latter may reduce the risk of ACS by mitigating hypercapnia and generating positive airway pressure that limits hypoventilation and atelectasis (pulmonary effect). The study hypothesises that HFNO is a safe and effective strategy for treating VOC and preventing secondary ACS, and will assess this using a multi-arm multi-stage (MAMS) trial design.
This is a prospective, multicentre, randomised, open-label controlled trial following an MAMS design with three phases and four arms: one control (low-flow oxygen) and three HFNO intervention arms with varying fraction of inspired oxygen levels (low, intermediate, high). The pilot stage will assess safety and feasibility, using the rate of cardiac and neurological events as the primary endpoint. In the activity stage, arms demonstrating acceptable safety will be compared for efficacy based on the rate of VOC resolution without complications by day 5, allowing selection of the most promising arm. The final efficacy stage will compare the selected HFNO strategy to control, with prevention of secondary ACS by day 14 as the primary endpoint. The study aims to enrol up to 350 VOC episodes in total.
The study has been granted ethical approval (CPP SUD MEDITERRANEE IV). Following the provision of informed consent, patients will be included in the study. The results will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals.
Cancer, as a significant global health challenge, poses numerous difficulties for those affected. Self-advocacy, which refers to an individual’s capacity and desire to articulate their preferences and needs when confronted with disease-related obstacles, is crucial in enhancing their quality of life. Given the absence of a validated instrument for assessing self-advocacy in the Iranian patient population with cancer, this protocol aims to describe the psychometric properties of the Self-Advocacy in Cancer Survivorship (SACS) Scale in Persian among Iranian patients with cancer.
In this methodological study, the SACS Scale will be translated into Persian following the WHO guidelines. Subsequently, the scale’s validity, including face validity, content validity, construct validity (confirmatory factor analysis, exploratory factor analysis and convergent validity) and reliability (internal consistency and test–retest reliability), will be evaluated using SPSS V.24 and Amos V.24 software, along with appropriate statistical tests. Study participants will be patients with cancer in Ardabil, selected through convenience sampling.
This study, forming part of a master’s thesis, received ethical approval from the research ethics board of Ardebil University of Medical Sciences (IR.ARUMS.REC.1403.227, 7 October 2024). The findings will be disseminated at local, national and international levels.
This study aimed to determine the psychological effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on healthcare professionals working in primary care settings in the first year of the pandemic.
The healthcare industry has faced an unprecedented burden in the COVID-19 pandemic. Primary care professionals experienced the high level of psychological problems.
A total of 793 healthcare professionals from different regions of Turkey participated in this cross-sectional study. The STROBE (Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology) checklist was used in the study. Data were collected online.
It has been found that more than half of healthcare professionals experienced severe depression, three-quarters experienced anxiety, and almost half experienced stress. It was also found that about half of the participants experienced a high degree of acute and chronic fatigue, and one-fifth experienced low inter-shift recovery.
The effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the mental health of primary care professionals, especially nurses and midwives, are alarming. The problems that arise from the flawed healthcare delivery models and gender inequality, which worsen the usual psychological effects of the pandemic on primary care professionals, should be addressed urgently.
Psychological support and rehabilitative services should be expanded to eliminate the short- and long-term psychological effects of the pandemic on healthcare professionals.
FreshRSS 