Conectar
This study explored how Structured Medication Reviews (SMRs) are being undertaken and the challenges to their successful implementation and sustainability.
A cross-sectional mixed methods online survey.
Primary care in England.
120 clinical pharmacists with experience in conducting SMRs in primary care.
Survey responses were received from clinical pharmacists working in 15 different regions. The majority were independent prescribers (62%, n=74), and most were employed by Primary Care Networks (65%, n=78), delivering SMRs for one or more general practices. 61% (n=73) had completed, or were currently enrolled in, the approved training pathway. Patient selection was largely driven by the primary care contract specification: care home residents, patients with polypharmacy, patients on medicines commonly associated with medication errors, patients with severe frailty and/or patients using potentially addictive pain management medication. Only 26% (n=36) of respondents reported providing patients with information in advance. The majority of SMRs were undertaken remotely by telephone and were 21–30 min in length. Much variation was reported in approaches to conducting SMRs, with SMRs in care homes being deemed the most challenging due to additional complexities involved. Challenges included not having sufficient time to prepare adequately, address complex polypharmacy and complete follow-up work generated by SMRs, issues relating to organisational support, competing national priorities and lack of ‘buy-in’ from some patients and General Practitioners.
These results offer insights into the role being played by the clinical pharmacy workforce in a new country-wide initiative to improve the quality and safety of care for patients taking multiple medicines. Better patient preparation and trust, alongside continuing professional development, more support and oversight for clinical pharmacists conducting SMRs, could lead to more efficient medication reviews. However, a formal evaluation of the potential of SMRs to optimise safe medicines use for patients in England is now warranted.
Young-onset type 2 diabetes (YOD), diagnosed before 40 years of age, entails a high disease burden and potential for early dependence on disability benefits. The risk of type 2 diabetes (T2D) varies with socio-economic status and ethnic background, yet the relationship between these factors and age at diagnosis is insufficiently explored. We aimed to study associations between YOD and living on disability benefits, educational level and country background.
Cross-sectional data on 8640 individuals with T2D, linked to data on educational level and country background, were compared with population data from the same residential areas. Similar comparisons were made for data on disability benefits among 3854 individuals of working age (
The risk of being dependent on disability benefits was three times higher in YOD (adjusted incidence rate ratio, aIRR (95% CI) 3.1 (2.7 to 3.5)) and twice as high in later-onset T2D (1.9 (1.8 to 2.1)) as in the general population. People of Norwegian background with low educational levels had threefold higher YOD risk (3.3 (2.4 to 4.4)) than those with a tertiary degree, while people of non-Western backgrounds with low educational levels had a smaller increase in YOD risk (1.5 (1.1 to 2.1)). People of non-Western backgrounds had higher YOD risk than those of Norwegian background (4.2 (3.5 to 5.0)), while people of south Asian background had an even greater relative YOD risk (9.0 (7.3 to 11.0)), threefold higher than for later-onset T2D (3.2 (2.8 to 3.7)).
Lifetime risk of being dependent on disability benefits was substantially higher for individuals with YOD than in later onset T2D. Non-Western and particularly south Asian backgrounds were associated with increased YOD risk. Low education was an important YOD risk factor only for people with Norwegian background.
Despite an increasing use of screens among preschool children and evidence suggesting potential adverse effects, there is a paucity of longitudinal research that aims to disentangle the multifaceted components of screen use and their unique associations with development. We present a protocol for a large-scale national longitudinal study with repeated measurements in Danish preschool children, with the aim of investigating the cross-sectional and cross-lagged longitudinal associations between screen use and psychological outcomes.
The Digital Child Study is a national prospective observational cohort of Danish preschool children. Baseline parent-report data collection commenced in 2024 via online questionnaires, and in total will include three time points over 1 year: baseline (age 4 years), and follow-ups at 6 and 12 months (ages 4.5 and 5 years). Participants were divided into two waves based on birth dates, starting in March and September 2024. Recruitment targeted parents and primary caregivers of all Danish children born between specific dates in 2020. Of 30 235 children whose parents were sent invitations, baseline questionnaire data were available for 11 690 (39%).
Children’s screen use was measured by detailed information of amount, content and timing of children’s screen use, and the broader context, incorporating parental mediation strategies, attitudes, motivations and practices. Cognitive and socioemotional developmental outcomes were measured using validated tools such as the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire, the Nordic Five-to-Fifteen parent questionnaire and the Behaviour Rating Inventory of Executive Function—Preschool Version. Questionnaire data will be linked to national social and health registries to enable long-term follow-up. Statistical analyses will include longitudinal modelling to explore associations between screen use and developmental outcomes, with sensitivity analyses for robustness. The study’s large sample size provides high statistical power to detect meaningful effects.
The study adheres to ethical research guidelines, ensuring voluntary participation, confidentiality and compliance with data protection laws, with approvals from relevant authorities. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, conferences and plain-language summaries to engage stakeholders and the broader community.
Prescribing patterns for hyperopia in children vary widely among eye care providers worldwide. This scoping review aims to identify and map the current literature on optical correction and catalogue outcomes reported, particularly in the domains of vision, vision-related functional outcomes and quality of life (QoL) in school-aged children with hyperopia.
This protocol was developed in accordance with the Joanna Briggs Institute’s Manual for Evidence Synthesis. We will include studies involving school-aged children with hyperopia without restrictions on sex, gender, race, ethnicity, type of optical correction, length of intervention, publication date or country of origin. We will include studies with internal or external comparison groups. We will exclude studies associated with myopia control treatments, ocular and visual pathway pathologies affecting vision or visual function. We will search Cochrane CENTRAL, Embase.com and PubMed. Examples of data to be extracted include population demographics, visual acuity, study-specific definitions for refractive error, treatment regimens for optical correction, vision and vision-related functional outcomes and QoL (general or vision-related) as quantified by validated instruments.
Informed consent and Institutional Review Board approval will not be required, as this scoping review will only use published data. The results from the scoping review will be disseminated by publication in a peer-reviewed scientific journal and at professional conferences.
Primary care electronic health records provide a rich source of information for inequalities research. However, the reliability and validity of the research derived from these records depend on the completeness and resolution of the codelists (ie, collections of medical terms/codes) used to identify populations of interest. The aim of this project was to develop comprehensive codelists for identifying people from ethnic minority groups, people with learning disabilities (LDs), people with severe mental illness (SMI) and people who are transgender.
We followed a three-stage process to define and extract relevant codelists. First, groups of interest were defined a priori. Next, relevant clinical codes, relating to the groups, were identified by searching Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) publications, codelist repositories and the CPRD Code Browser. Relevant codelists were extracted and merged according to group, and duplicates were removed. Finally, the remaining codes were reviewed by two general practitioners (GPs).
The curated codelists were compared using a representative sample in the UK. The frequencies of individuals identified using the curated codelists were assessed and compared with widely used alternative codelists.
Comprehensiveness was assessed in a representative CPRD population of 10 966 759 people.
After removal of duplicates and GP review, codelists were finalised with 325 unique codes for ethnicity, 558 for LD, 499 for SMI and 38 for transgender. Compared with comparator codelists, an additional 48 017 (76.6%), 52 953 (68.9%) and 508 (36.9%) people with LD, SMI or transgender code were identified. The proportions identified for ethnicity, meanwhile, were consistent with expectations for the UK (eg, 6.50% Asian, 2.66% black and 1.44% mixed).
The curated codelists are more sensitive than those widely used in practice and research. Discrepancies between national estimates and primary care records suggest potential record/retention issues. Resolving these requires further investigation and could lead to improved data quality for research.
Despite growing evidence to characterise cancer-associated cognitive decline (CACD) in women with breast cancer, interventions to mitigate CACD are limited. Emerging evidence suggests aerobic exercise may enhance cognition after breast cancer diagnosis and treatment; yet, CACD remains an understudied outcome of exercise, and few high-quality studies have been conducted. In addition to knowledge gaps in effectiveness, the translation of exercise interventions to community settings remains challenging. The Breast cancer Reasoning and Activity INtervention (BRAIN) investigates the effectiveness of aerobic exercise training, delivered in a community-based setting, for improving cognitive function in women with breast cancer and gathers information on the implementation success of the intervention.
This Hybrid Type I effectiveness–implementation study is conducted at an academic medical centre in the southwestern United States in partnership with a non-profit, community health and wellness organisation. The study enrols 160 women diagnosed with stage I–IIIa breast cancer and within 3–36 months of treatment completion into a 1:1 randomised controlled trial. Individuals randomised to the exercise group receive a 6-month, individually tailored aerobic exercise programme delivered by exercise trainers employed at local community fitness centres. The programme is progressive in nature and designed to help participants achieve aerobic exercise levels consistent with guidelines for cancer survivors. Individuals randomise to the control group receive a 6-month health education control intervention delivered virtually by hospital-based health educators. Cognitive performance (primary), self-reported cognition, patient-reported outcomes, physical activity and cardiorespiratory fitness are measured at baseline, 6 months (postintervention) and 12 months (follow-up). Brain structure and function are measured via magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at baseline and 6 months. Implementation outcomes are defined by the RE-AIM framework, which includes reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation and maintenance. RE-AIM outcomes are measured at baseline, 6 months, 12 months and ongoing during the study.
This study was approved by the Mayo Clinic Institutional Review Board (#23-000020). All participants provide informed consent prior to participation. Findings will be disseminated to scientific, clinical and community audiences through manuscripts, presentations and newsletters.
Liver cirrhosis accounts for over 10 000 deaths in the UK each year with a total loss of 60 000 quality-adjusted life-years. There is a substantial cost to the NHS of £4.5 billion, with new liver-related decompensation events accounting for the majority of this. Following an acute cirrhosis decompensating event, there is a significant risk of hospital readmission with 90-day readmission rates as high as 53%. Current care in the UK is reactive and patients are often only readmitted when they have presented acutely as an emergency with significant decompensation.
CirrhoCare is a prospective, multicentre, randomised controlled trial comparing the CirrhoCare management system with standard-of-care for high-risk cirrhosis patients who have been discharged following an admission with acute decompensation. The CirrhoCare management system comprises a novel digital platform for use in a patient’s home, designed to proactively detect the first signs of new decompensation in patients with established cirrhosis, discharged to the community. This enables a clinician to instigate early community-based care or, if needed, to triage the patient for hospital interventions.
214 patients will be recruited to the CirrhoCare trial from at least 12 UK centres. Patients will be randomised on a 1:1 ratio allocation to the CirrhoCare Management System or standard of care. Participants who are randomised to CirrhoCare will receive a CirrhoCare health kit comprising a smart watch, smart phone with enabled SIM (Subscriber Identity Module) network card, blood pressure monitor, weighing scales and thermometer. Participants will take measurements every morning Monday to Friday and will be followed up for 90 days postdischarge.
The primary objective of this study is to assess the clinical effectiveness of the CirrhoCare digital management system. We hypothesise that its early community-based intervention will reduce the number of unplanned hospital interventions and admissions and prevent liver-related complications when compared with standard-of-care management.
CirrhoCare is a National Institute for Health and Care Research-funded study (NCT06223893). The study has UK Research Ethics Committee and Health Research Authority (HRA) approvals, with approval granted by the HRA and Health and Care Research Wales committee. The results of this study will be published in peer review journals, disseminated at international conferences as well as established Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement networks.
To coproduce an inclusive intervention for blood pressure (BP) self-management post partum.
Using the person-based approach, an intervention was coproduced in three phases. Phase 1 entailed intervention coproduction with a diverse patient and public involvement panel and stakeholders (clinical, academic, government and third sector-based). Phase 2 involved intervention optimisation through think-aloud interviews with former patients and clinicians. Phase 3 was user-testing followed by semistructured interviews with current patients and their clinicians.
Patients and clinicians from primary and secondary care drawn from Southern and Northern England.
Seven former patients and 11 clinicians participated in think-aloud interviews to provide their views of intervention prototypes (phase 2). Additionally, 23 patients and 9 of their clinicians participated in semistructured interviews after using the intervention for 2 weeks (phase 3).
An interactive patient app—My BP Care—and accompanying leaflet to support BP self-monitoring. These were linked to a clinician dashboard with alerts and an emailing system to facilitate appropriate titration of patient medication.
The intervention was codeveloped following these guiding principles to ensure it was accessible and inclusive: easily comprehensible, motivating, simple and quick to use. Interview findings indicated that patient adherence to the intervention was promoted by the initial patient training conducted by the midwives, the enhanced clinical oversight they felt they received as a result of the intervention, the free BP monitor they received, reassurance they received of the medication safety for them and their baby, the intervention’s simplicity and the motivating reminders they received.
Through coproduction with a diverse group of patients and stakeholders, and optimisation through testing among further diverse patients and clinicians, we developed a multicomponent intervention that is accessible and engaging for diverse patients, compatible with prevailing clinical practice and adaptable to different clinical contexts.
Depression and anxiety are highly prevalent mental health conditions that significantly affect quality of life and cause societal burdens. However, their detection and diagnosis rates remain low owing to the limitations of the current screening methods. With rapid technological advancements and the proliferation of consumer-grade wearable devices and smartphones, their integration into digital phenotyping research has enabled the unobtrusive screening for depression and anxiety in natural settings. The Smartphone and Wearable Assessment for Real-Time Screening of Depression and Anxiety study aims to develop prediction algorithms to identify individuals at risk for depressive and anxiety disorders, as well as those with mild-to-severe levels of either condition or both. By collecting comprehensive data using smartphones and smartwatches, this study aims to facilitate the translation of artificial intelligence-based early detection research into clinical impact, thereby potentially enhancing patient care through more accurate and timely interventions.
This cross-sectional observational study will enrol up to 2500 participants (at least 1000) aged 19-59 years from South Korea via social media outreach and clinical referrals. The eligible participants must use a compatible smartphone. Each participant will be followed up for 4 weeks. Data will be collected using a custom-developed smartphone application called PixelMood. Active data collection will include daily, weekly and monthly self-report questionnaires incorporating validated scales, such as the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 and Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7. Passive data from smartphones include information on physical activity, location, ambient light and smartphone usage patterns. Optionally, participants using the Apple Watch or Galaxy Watch devices can provide additional data on physiological responses and sleep health. The primary outcome will be the development of machine-learning algorithms to predict depression and anxiety based on these digital biomarkers. We will employ various machine-learning techniques, including random forest, support vector machine and deep-learning models. The secondary outcomes will include the association between digital biomarkers and clinical measures, and the feasibility and acceptability of data collection methods. Various features characterising mobile usage behaviours, physical/social activity, sleep patterns, resting physiological states and circadian rhythms will be exploited to serve as potential digital phenotyping markers. Advanced machine-learning and deep-learning techniques will be applied to multimodal data for model generation.
This study protocol was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Korea University Anam Hospital (approval number: 2023AN0506). The results of this study will be disseminated via multiple channels. The findings will be presented at local, national and international conferences in relevant fields, such as psychiatry, psychology and digital health. Manuscripts detailing the study results will be submitted to peer-reviewed journals for publication.
The present study was registered with the Clinical Research Information Service (CRIS, https://cris.nih.go.kr; identifier: KCT0009183).
The cuff leak test (CLT) is hypothesised to help optimise extubation by assessing for laryngeal oedema which, if unrecognised and untreated, could lead to post-extubation stridor, post-extubation airway obstruction, and reintubation. However, the diagnostic accuracy of the CLT to detect post-extubation stridor (and hence potentially airway obstruction) remains uncertain. Given the equipoise that exists surrounding the CLT, we are conducting a pilot randomised clinical trial (RCT) examining the CLT as part of the pathway to extubation. Herein, we report the protocol for the
This is a multicentre, international, parallel-group, pragmatic, pilot RCT. We will enrol 100 mechanically ventilated patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) who are deemed ready for extubation and have at least one risk factor for laryngeal oedema. In the intervention arm, respiratory therapists will perform a qualitative CLT before extubation. If a patient passes the CLT (suggesting no laryngeal oedema), extubation will be performed in keeping with standard care. If the patient fails the CLT (suggesting laryngeal oedema), extubation will be delayed allowing for administration of dexamethasone, consideration of diuresis, and the CLT will be repeated in 12–24 hours. In the control arm, patients will be extubated without completing a CLT, without steroid administration, and without delay. Randomization will be by a 1:1 allocation, stratified by centre. The primary feasibility outcomes will include recruitment and protocol adherence. Secondary outcomes will include post-extubation stridor, reintubation within 72 hours, emergency surgical airway within 72 hours, and ICU and hospital mortality within 30 days.
This trial has been approved by Clinical Trials Ontario, Hamilton Integrated Research Ethics Board, State of Kuwait Ministry of Health, University of Texas Health Committee for the Protection of Human Subjects and Brant Community Health Systems Research Ethics Committee. The trial has received a No Objection Letter from Health Canada. Trial results will be disseminated via publication in peer-reviewed journals.
Breast cancer risk can be substantially reduced with risk-reducing medications (RRMeds). Despite their efficacy, and guidelines which support their use for women at substantially increased risk of breast cancer, they are underused. Barriers to their use in Australia include a lack of awareness of RRMeds by women and clinicians, and a primary care workforce that reports a lack of knowledge and confidence in discussing and/or prescribing these medications. In contrast, Australian clinicians have reported specialist support and guidance as a key facilitator. The Preventing Cancer with Medications (PCMed) Telehealth Service was therefore developed to provide this specialist support and to bridge the evidence–implementation gap. The PCMed Service endeavours to increase the appropriate use of RRMeds and support women and their doctors throughout treatment. The aim of this research is to evaluate the effectiveness, adoption, acceptability, feasibility, fidelity and cost of this new Service, and to determine any adaptations that might be required.
The research uses a mixed methods approach. Effectiveness of the PCMed Service will be evaluated by determining whether the PCMed Service is associated with increased uptake of RRMeds compared with historical data. Secondary outcomes include: adoption of the Service, specifically, the proportion of women who attend a PCMed Service consultation; acceptability of the Service for clients and referring clinicians (using a brief survey and semistructured interviews); feasibility and fidelity by evaluating the adherence to the planned Service processes; and the cost, by reporting the difference between funding received per woman and the cost for service delivery.
This study was approved by the institutional Human Research Ethics Committee (EC00235): HREC/101142/PMCC. The findings will inform future iterations of the Service prior to scaling up. Research findings will be disseminated at scientific meetings and in peer-reviewed journals.
Regular exercise significantly benefits mental health, yet its therapeutic potential in psychiatric care remains underutilised. Understanding the factors influencing physical activity in individuals with mental illness is crucial to realising its full therapeutic potential. Our study seeks to explore motivational and socio-demographic determinants affecting exercise habits in individuals with mental illness and compare them to those without mental illness.
Distribution of the link to a cross-sectional online survey at psychiatric clinics, practices, university events and sports clubs, via self-help group email lists and on social media.
An online survey using validated questionnaires supplemented with self-developed items was conducted. Statistical analysis encompassed unpaired t-tests and 2 tests to compare individuals with and without mental illness, as well as multiple linear regression to investigate the relationship between childhood exercise experience, psychometrics and current physical activity behaviour in individuals with mental illness.
1564 individuals (66.5% female) including 417 diagnosed with any kind of mental illness.
In comparison with mentally healthy participants, individuals diagnosed with mental illness displayed notably lower activity levels (eg, engaging in regular physical activity 55.6% vs 69.3%, x2(1, n=1458) = 26.03, p
There is a dire need for professionally supervised, small group exercise programmes for people with mental illness incorporating cognitive-behavioural elements, to better address their individual needs and to positively influence previously mentioned psychometric determinants. Furthermore, the importance of sport and physical activity in childhood, and especially in adolescence, was reaffirmed, underlining the paramount importance of youth sport programmes in long-term health promotion from a public health perspective.
This study aimed to examine the mediating role of eating disorders in the association between problematic social media use (PSMU) and psychological distress, including anxiety, depression and stress, among Chinese college students. The primary hypothesis was that eating disorders would partially mediate the relationship between PSMU and psychological distress.
A cross-sectional study.
Participants were recruited from a vocational college in Jiangxi, China.
A total of 454 college students aged 18 years or older participated in the study. The median age was 19 years (IQR=18, 20), and 73.4% were male. Participants were included if they were enrolled in college and able to provide informed consent. Students undergoing psychological treatment or taking psychiatric medications were excluded.
PSMU was assessed using the Bergen Social Media Addiction Scale, psychological distress was assessed using the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales-21 and eating disorder symptoms were assessed using the SCOFF questionnaire.
PSMU was significantly associated with higher levels of psychological distress (r=0.321, p
Eating disorders play a partial mediating role in the relationship between PSMU and psychological distress among Chinese college students. These findings highlight the need for mental health interventions addressing both PSMU and eating disorders. Future research should use longitudinal designs to establish causal relationships.
ChiCTR2300078008.
Patients with poor perioperative glycaemic control after total joint arthroplasty are at an increased risk of complications, mortality, delayed return to function and increased costs of care. Although correction of hyperglycaemia has been shown to improve patient outcomes, there is a lack of consensus regarding optimal perioperative glucose management after total joint replacement surgery. This pilot study aims to assess the feasibility of performing a multicentre randomised controlled trial to investigate the effect of perioperative metformin use on glycaemic control in the setting of total joint arthroplasty.
This blinded, placebo-controlled, pilot randomised controlled trial will enrol 40 participants aged 18–99 years undergoing total hip or knee arthroplasty at a single academic tertiary centre. Patients will be randomly allocated to two groups of 20 participants each and will receive metformin or a placebo, respectively, for 2 weeks preoperatively, continued on the day of surgery, and up to 2 days postoperatively. The primary outcome is a composite of four endpoints to assess study feasibility: timely recruitment, timely study drug administration, protocol adherence and retention. Secondary outcomes include perioperative glycaemic variability, sliding scale insulin utilisation, hospital length of stay and 90-day rates of infection, mortality and readmission. Analyses will be on an intention-to-treat basis.
The protocol was approved by Oregon Health & Science University Institutional Review Board, STUDY00025798. Written informed consent will be obtained for study participation. Findings will be disseminated via publication in peer-reviewed journals and conference presentations.
Childhood tuberculous meningitis (TBM) is a devastating disease. The long-standing WHO recommendation for treatment is 2 months of intensive phase with isoniazid (H), rifampicin (R), pyrazinamide (Z) and ethambutol (E), followed by 10 months of isoniazid and rifampicin. In 2022, WHO released a conditional recommendation that 6 months of intensified antituberculosis therapy (ATT) could be used as an alternative for drug-susceptible TBM. However, this has never been evaluated in a randomised clinical trial. Trials evaluating ATT shortening regimens using high-dose rifampicin and drugs with better central nervous system penetration alongside adjuvant anti-inflammatory therapy are needed to improve outcomes.
The
Local ethics committees at all participating study sites and respective regulators approved the SURE protocol. Ethics approval was also obtained from UCL, UK (14935/001). Informed consent from parents/carers and assent from age-appropriate children are required for all participants. Results will be published in international peer-reviewed journals, and appropriate media will be used to summarise results for patients and their families and policymakers.
ISRCTN40829906 (registered 13 November 2018).
To understand the help-seeking experiences of young people from culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) backgrounds who have experienced suicidal thoughts and behaviours (STB).
Qualitative study using semistructured interviews and reflexive thematic analysis.
A specialist, youth-focused Hospital Outreach Post-suicidal Engagement (HOPE) aftercare service delivered by Orygen in North-West Melbourne, Australia.
Eight young people aged 16–24 years (mean: 18.7±3.1 years, 50% female) from various CALD backgrounds who had been discharged from the HOPE aftercare service within the past 12 months.
Four themes were identified: (1) cultural taboos and generational differences create challenges in communicating with family; (2) isolation is a barrier to reaching out; (3) it’s hard to disclose and discuss STB with clinicians and (4) not being taken seriously in clinical settings.
These findings highlight social, cultural and organisational barriers that shape the help-seeking journeys of young people from CALD backgrounds experiencing STB. Results suggest a need for culturally sensitive suicide prevention strategies, enhanced cultural competency in healthcare settings and efforts to improve mental health literacy within CALD communities.
FreshRSS 