Conectar
by Mohajit Arneja, Swetharajan Gunasekar, Dharaneswari Hari Narayanan, Joshma Joseph, Harilalith Kovvuri, Sharath Shanmugam, Pavitraa Saravana Kumar, Asuwin Anandaram, Vinod Kumar Balakrishnan, Jayanty Venkata Balasubramaniyan, Sadhanandham Shanmugasundaram, Sankaran Ramesh, Nagendra Boopathy Senguttuvan
BackgroundFaster time to reperfusion can be achieved by minimizing various patient and system-level delays that contribute to total ischemic time. Procedural delays within the catheterization laboratory represent a non-negligible and modifiable component in the chain of reperfusion, but remain unquantified by conventional metrics such as door-to-ballon (D2B) time. Universal catheter approaches have rapidly gained traction as an alternative to the traditional two catheter approach for transradial coronary interventions. However, their utility for both diagnostic angiography and subsequent angioplasty is limited, and the impact of this strategy on reperfusion outcomes has remained unexplored. We utilized a procedural metric termed fluoroscopy-to-device (FluTD) time to quantify the efficiency of a single catheter strategy, and assessed its impact on epicardial and myocardial perfusion.
Methods and resultsIn this retrospective study, consecutive STEMI patients undergoing transradial primary PCI (pPCI) at a tertiary care center in India between May 2022 to October 2024 were analyzed. Patients were divided into two groups: 51 underwent PCI using a single universal guiding catheter (UGC), and 51 underwent the conventional two-catheter (CTC) approach. The primary outcome of the study was a comparison of the FluTD time between the two procedural strategies. Secondary outcomes included myocardial blush grade (MBG), Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow grade, total fluoroscopy time, radiation dose, device safety and efficacy, and procedural success.The median FluTD time was significantly shorter in the UGC compared to the CTC group (3 minutes [IQR 3–4] vs. 10 minutes [IQR 8–17], p Conclusion
A single catheter strategy for both angiography and pPCI in STEMI patients was associated with a significant reduction in FluTD time and improved microvascular perfusion, without compromising device safety or efficacy. In low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), where intra- and extra-procedural delays are often more pronounced, inclusion of the single catheter strategy can optimize catheterization workflows and yield substantial cost-savings.
Spiritual well-being (SpWB) is a critical yet often underexplored component of holistic care for patients with advanced cancer. This study aimed to assess the SpWB and quality of life (QOL) levels and examine their correlation among patients receiving palliative care at a tertiary cancer centre in Kerala, India.
Institution-based cross-sectional observational study among patients with advanced cancer conducted between August 2023 and December 2024.
The outpatient department of a major tertiary-level, autonomous cancer centre under the Government of Kerala, India.
398 patients with advanced cancer aged 18 and above.
SpWB and QOL were measured using validated Malayalam versions of the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy–Spiritual well-being Expanded Version and European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Quality of Life Core 30 questionnaires, respectively. Data collection included patient self-reports or assistance by a medical social worker.
The median (IQR) age of participants was 59 (51–65) years; most were married (94.5%) and from an upper-lower socioeconomic background (55%). Hinduism was the predominant religion (67.1%). Almost all patients (99%) were aware of their diagnosis, but only 62.3% knew their prognosis. The median (IQR) SpWB score was 67.5 (57–76), significantly higher in females (p=0.02). The median (IQR) QOL score was 50 (41.7–66.7). SpWB was positively correlated with QOL (r=0.766, p
SpWB showed a strong positive correlation with QOL among patients with advanced cancer. Enhancing SpWB may play a pivotal role in improving overall QOL in palliative care settings.
by Gebremedhin Gebreegziabher Gebretsadik, Andargachew Kassa Biratu, Alemayehu Bayray Kahsay, Amanuel Gessessew, Zohra S. Lassi, Hailemariam Segni, Afework Mulugeta
BackgroundAdverse pregnancy outcomes continue to pose a significant global public health challenge, especially in low- and middle-income countries. Although preconception care (PCC) interventions are advised to address this problem, their adoption remains inadequate, supported by scarce evidence particularly in conflict-impacted areas such as Tigray, Ethiopia, where rates of poor outcomes like neural tube defects are notably higher than in other regions. This study investigates the experience of pregnant women regarding the use of PCC in the Tigray, northern Ethiopia.
MethodsA community-based cross-sectional study was conducted from July 31 to August 16, 2024, involving 764 pregnant women in their first or second trimester. Participants were consecutively enrolled from clusters until the predetermined sample size was achieved. Data were collected through interviewer-administered questionnaires in accordance with World Health Organization, and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and national guidelines. PCC uptake was measured as the receipt of any service component (screening, counseling, or management) during healthcare consultations. We used SPSS version 27.0 to analyze PCC uptake and its associated factors. Descriptive and binary logistic regression statistics were used in the analysis. Finally, data was presented using text, tables, and figures as appropriate.
ResultsIn this study, the overall uptake of PCC services was 7.2%. All participants in the current pregnancy were exposed to at least one risk factor for adverse pregnancy outcomes. Factors such as women’s decision-making power, having information about PCC, HIV screening during the current pregnancy, and perceived susceptibility to preconception risks showed a statistically significant positive association with the uptake of PCC services.
ConclusionThe uptake of PCC services was very low. Addressing the low uptake of PCC services requires a multifaceted strategy, including public health campaigns via media and social forums, strengthened health extension programs, and the integration of a reproductive life plan tool to improve health-seeking behavior among women.
Delirium, a common, serious and often preventable complication in older hospitalised adults, contributes to significant health and social care costs. Carers are uniquely positioned to identify early signs and support delirium prevention. The Prevention & Early Delirium Identification Carer Toolkit (PREDICT), a novel model of care designed to educate carers about delirium management and prevention strategies, enables them to actively participate in the care and recovery of their person. Developed through a comprehensive literature review, a co-designed eDelphi and pilot study, PREDICT demonstrated acceptability and feasibility.
To evaluate the effectiveness, implementation and cost-benefit of a PREDICT in hospital settings.
A stepped-wedge cluster randomised controlled trial (SW-cRCT), consisting of a cohort study, healthcare service evaluation, and process evaluation. The study will assess carer and staff knowledge of delirium, carer care giving stress, health service outcomes (e.g., incidence, length of stay, readmissions) and cost-benefit.
PREDICT is a scalable, person-centred approach that supports both patients and carers, with the potential to embed best-practice delirium management into routine healthcare.
This study was developed in consultation with older adults, carers and healthcare staff. Two consumer representatives joined the project steering committee and contributed to shaping the research question, refining the study protocol and selecting outcome measures relevant to families and healthcare staff. Carers were involved in reviewing participant information sheets and the PREDICT website, providing feedback to ensure clarity and accessibility. Results will be shared with participants and the wider community through plain-language summaries and public presentations.
Australian and New Zealand Clinical trial: ACTRN12625000705482 registered on the 3rd of July 2025
To explore the process of how nurses experience and deal with workplace violence based on nurses' perceptions and experiences in Iran.
An exploratory qualitative study was conducted using grounded theory approach. Participants included 17 nurses working in 4 hospitals in 2 urban areas in Iran with at least 1 year of clinical experience in emergency departments and intensive care units. Data were collected through in-depth, semi-structured individual interviews conducted between August 2024 and March 2025. The constant comparative analysis approach was used for data analysis. This research method was carried out in five stages: open coding to identify concepts; development of concepts in terms of their characteristics and dimensions; contextual analysis; integration of the process to data analysis; and final category integration.
The main concern of participants in dealing with workplace violence was a ‘multidimensional security threat’. ‘Perpetrator response to nursing care’ (at the individual level) and ‘organisational inefficiency’ (at the organisational level) provided the context for this threat. A general theme entitled ‘tensive adaptation’ was the core category in this research and included four main categories: ‘tolerant reactions’, ‘seeking help’, ‘passive reactions’ and ‘hostile reactions’. ‘Organisational damage’, ‘nurse damage’ and ‘patient damage’ were the outcomes.
The theoretical model of ‘tensive adaptation’ provides a new perspective on ‘what’ and ‘how’ nurses experience and manage workplace violence. Effective strategies for managing violence such as effective communication, empathy, providing appropriate care, anger management, self-care, effective teamwork and requesting support can be considered by nursing administrators and incorporated into training programmes for nurses and nursing students. The adverse consequences of nurses' exposure to workplace violence should receive greater attention, as the entire healthcare system is affected by this exposure.
Workplace violence leads to physical and psychological problems, reduced job satisfaction, diminished performance, negative effects on personal and family life and decreased quality of patient care. The main concern of participants in dealing with workplace violence was ‘multidimensional security threat’. This concept includes three characteristics: ‘psychological health threats’, ‘physical health threats’ and ‘professional position threat’. ‘Perpetrator response to nursing care’ (individual level) and ‘organisational inefficiency’ (organisational level) served as contextual conditions that expose nurses to workplace violence. In ‘tensive adaptation’, nurses attempt to respond to workplace violence through strategies such as ‘tolerant reactions’, ‘seeking help’, ‘passive reactions’ and ‘hostile reactions’. ‘Organisational damage’, ‘nurse damage’ and ‘patient damage’ are the consequences of nurses' exposure to workplace violence.
The Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ) was used to report this study.
This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct, or reporting.
by Anshu Parajulee, Abdo Souraya, Nancy Humber, Sean Ebert, Kim Williams, Tom Skinner, Jude Kornelsen
ObjectiveTo identify contextually relevant indicators to measure the quality of surgical and obstetrical care in low-volume rural hospitals using a consensus-based methodology.
MethodsA modified Delphi process was implemented in which participants were asked to rate the priority of proposed evaluation metrics over two rounds. Two Delphi surveys were electronically administered in 2019, approximately one month apart. Fifty-one health care professionals from across Canada, including rural proceduralists and quality improvement experts, were invited to participate. All quality measures in the first round were proposed by the study team. The second round included measures that did not reach consensus in the first round and measures suggested by respondents during the first round.
ResultsThirty individuals participated in Round 1 (59% response rate). Of the 30 respondents from Round 1, 23 participated in Round 2 (77% response rate). 115 of 177 proposed measures (65%) reached positive consensus in Round 1 or 2. Expert participants agreed that these measures should be prioritized/included when evaluating surgical and/or obstetrical quality in rural hospitals. No measure reached negative consensus in either round. Open-text comments offered practical guidance on how to interpret and use surgical and obstetrical quality data within a rural context. Many respondents believed that rare adverse outcomes have low relevance at rural hospitals where volumes are low, procedures are almost all lower complexity day cases (Cesarean section being the major exception), and patients are typically healthy.
ConclusionThe modified Delphi process resulted in the identification of surgical and obstetrical quality indicators that are contextually embedded in the realities of rural practice. The methodology allowed for the consideration of factors often overlooked by normative urban-based approaches, including team-based care characteristic of rural hospitals and limited access to specialist care and imaging services.
To examine the personal characteristics, promoting factors and organisational barriers to the professional realisation of diabetes nurse practitioners in Israel.
A descriptive study using quantitative and qualitative data.
The participants self-completed an electronic questionnaire, which included questions on demographic and professional characteristics and a self-realisation questionnaire constructed by the authors. Researcher-led focus groups were conducted, guided by a semi-structured guide. The discussions were recorded, transcribed and analysed by qualitative methods.
Forty-one diabetes nurse practitioners (median age 50 years, 98% females) participated in the study. On average, the participants reported a relatively high self-realisation of their professional role, especially those who have been working in this role for many years. While some of them work independently and are supported by their organisation, their managers and other healthcare team members, specifically physicians, many feel that there are barriers to the full implementation of the role and achieving professional realisation. These include multitasking challenges and insufficient remuneration. Self-realisation was viewed by the participants as an opportunity to provide excellent care to patients as well as being professional beyond caring for patients. They wanted to expand their knowledge as well as guide and teach. Furthermore, they also associated self-realisation with the autonomy to carry out procedures and make decisions independently of physicians. Internal motivation was perceived as an important factor for personal self-realisation, which stems from personal creativity, aspiration for excellence, a subjective sense of freedom, self-guidance, desire for self-development and aspiration for personal growth at the highest levels.
Recognition and fostering of diabetes nurse practitioners' role contribute to nurses' self-realisation and professional growth.
Personal and organisational factors should be aligned to support diabetes nurse practitioners in delivering high-quality care to patients with diabetes.
COREQ (COnsolidated criteria for REporting Qualitative research).
No patient or public contribution.
To identify research gaps by mapping what is known about the barriers and enablers to pre-registration nursing students identifying signs of suicidal distress in healthcare consumers and providing clear pathways of support.
Scoping review.
This scoping review was conducted using Arksey and O'Malley's (2005) five stage framework and the Levec et al. (2010) extensions of this framework.
The Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) Complete and Ovid MEDLINE databases were searched to identify relevant articles, keywords and search terms to inform the full search strategy for CINAHL. This search strategy was then adapted for Scopus, PsychInfo, Emcare, Medline and ERIC, searched in November 2024.
Studies eligible for inclusion (N = 28) represented research from 14 countries; most (53.5%, n = 15) used a quantitative design, 11 (39.3%) were qualitative and two (7.1%) used a mixed-methods design. Barriers found from the scoping review included a low level of knowledge of suicidality, stigma preventing students from assessing and acting on suicidal ideation, and a lack of confidence in providing care to healthcare consumers expressing suicidality. Enablers included lived experience, exposure to individuals expressing suicidal ideation and education, simulation and role play. This review also contributes to the existing literature about the relationship of nursing to existing suicide prevention frameworks and suggests revision of these frameworks to address staff attitudes and beliefs, as well as lived and living experience.
Nurses are ideally placed to assess and respond to suicidality among healthcare consumers, and preparation should begin during pre-registration studies. Our scoping review indicates that further research work is needed to address the barriers to working with healthcare consumers expressing suicidality and to enhance the enablers to provide safe care.
Addressing the barriers and enablers to pre-registration nursing students providing safe care for healthcare consumers expressing suicidality is essential. Further research is required to address the barriers and enhance the enablers identified in this scoping review.
What problem did the study address? This scoping review summarised the literature on pre-registration student ability to work with healthcare consumers expressing suicidality, identifying barriers and enablers. What were the main findings? Barriers include poor knowledge of suicidality, stigma, fear and a lack of confidence in working with healthcare consumers expressing suicidality. Enablers include lived experience, exposure to clinical settings where healthcare consumers express suicidality and simulation and education. Where and on whom will the research have an impact? The research will have an impact on providers of pre-registration nursing degrees, where the inclusion of content addressing suicidality and exposure to settings where individuals express suicidal ideation is shown to improve attitudes and knowledge of suicidality assessment.
PRISMA checklist for scoping reviews.
This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct or reporting.
by Muluken Chanie Agimas, Mekuriaw Nibret Aweke, Berhanu Mengistu, Lemlem Daniel Baffa, Elsa Awoke Fentie, Ever Siyoum Shewarega, Aysheshim Kassahun Belew, Esmael Ali Muhammad
IntroductionMalaria is a global public health problem, particularly in sub-Saharan African countries. It is responsible for 90% of all deaths worldwide. To reduce the impact and complications associated with delayed treatment of malaria among children under five, comprehensive evidence about the magnitude and determinants of delayed treatment for malaria could be the solution. But there are no national-level studies in the Horn of Africa for decision-makers.
ObjectiveTo assess the prevalence and associated factors of delay in seeking malaria treatment among under-five children in the Horn of Africa.
MethodPublished and unpublished papers were searched on Google, Google Scholar, PubMed/Medline, EMBASE, SCOPUS, and the published articles’ reference list. The search mechanism was established using Medical Subject Heading (MeSH) terms by combining the key terms of the title. Joana Brigg’s Institute critical appraisal checklist was used to assess the quality of articles. A sensitivity test was conducted to evaluate the heterogeneity of the studies. The visual funnel plot test and Egger’s and Begg’s statistics in the random effect model were done to evaluate the publication bias and small study effect. The I2 statistics were also used to quantify the amount of heterogeneity between the included studies.
ResultsThe pooled prevalence of delayed treatment for malaria among under-five children in the Horn of Africa was 48% (95% CI: 34%–63%). History of child death (OR =2.5, 95% CI: 1.73–3.59), distance >3000 meters (OR = 2.59, 95% CI: 2.03–3.3), drug side effect (OR = 2.94, 95% CI: 1.86–4.67), formal education (OR = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.49–0.96), middle income (OR = 0.42, 95% CI: 0.28–0.63), expensiveness (OR = 4.39, 95% CI: 2.49–7.76), and affordable cost (OR = 2.13, 95% CI: 1.41–3.2) for transport were factors associated with malaria treatment delay among children.
Conclusion and recommendationsAbout one out of two parents in the Horn of Africa put off getting their kids treated for malaria. High transportation expenses, long travel times (greater than 3,000 meters) to medical facilities, and anxiety about drug side effects were major risk factors that contributed to this delay. On the other hand, a middle-class income was found to be protective of treatment delays. These results highlight how crucial it is to improve access to healthcare services, both financially and physically, to minimize delays in treating malaria in the area’s children.
Nurse-led education programs in childcare settings are critical for improving early childhood health outcomes and caregiver practices. Despite their potential, a systematic synthesis of their effectiveness is lacking.
To summarize the characteristics and evaluate the effectiveness of existing nurse-led education programs in childcare settings through a systematic review of experimental studies.
This review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. A comprehensive search was conducted in five databases from inception to December 9, 2024. Two reviewers independently screened articles, extracted data, and assessed study quality. Due to methodological heterogeneity, a narrative synthesis was performed. The review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024618983).
Twelve studies met the inclusion criteria, involving 900 childcare workers and 920 families. The programs targeted two main areas: prevention of child health issues and management of child health issues. Lectures and group discussions were the most frequently used strategies. Nurses assumed diverse roles, including educators, consultants, and facilitators. The findings revealed several benefits, including reduced rates of upper respiratory illness, improved family health practices—such as appropriate medication use—and enhanced childcare worker competencies in first aid knowledge.
Nurses play a critical role in implementing education programs in childcare settings. Their contributions should be fully integrated into program planning and delivery. Future research should adopt rigorous methodologies to strengthen evidence-based practices and improve child health outcomes and caregiver competencies.
Indigenous Mayan-Yucatecan communities in Mexico have a high prevalence of chronic non-communicable diseases (NCDs) such as diabetes, hypertension, obesity and rheumatic diseases (RMDs). According to the syndemic theory, these diseases combined with social, economic and cultural factors affect the quality of life. The aim of this protocol is to describe the methodological process to create, implement and evaluate a Syndemic-Based Care Model (SCM), using a Community Based-Participatory Research (CBPR) strategy in three Mayan-Yucatecan communities.
This is a convergent mixed-methods protocol. The quantitative component is a before-after study, and the qualitative component is an ethnographic study. The intervention will be a SCM co-constructed with Mayan communities based on their particular needs and aiming for reduction of the negative impact of NCD/RMD through a multidisciplinary approach. We will follow four phases of the CBPR: (1) situational analysis, through community censuses and semistructured interviews to understand the prevalence of NCDs and the syndemics in these communities; (2) co-construction of the elements of a SCM based on the health priorities identified by researchers, community members and healthcare workers; (3) implementation of this SCM and (4) evaluation of the SCM through (1) statistical analyses involving the construction of a syndemic index through stepwise logistic regression of the normalised and standardised key clinical, social and economic variables; interval and ratio variables will be normalised by their z-score and categorical variables will be one-hot encoded; similarity and social networks analysis with clustering to identify syndemic subpopulations; and cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analyses using Markov modelling and (2) narrative and thematic qualitative analysis of the SCM’s implementation and impact on community members’ health, function and quality of life.
Research ethics boards of participant institutions approved this research protocol. This project will be presented to municipal authorities, community meetings and community leaders for observation and acceptance. For people who wish to participate, informed consent will be provided written and verbally in Spanish or Mayan-Yucatecan according to the participant preferences, and it can be signed by either autograph or fingerprint. The results of this research will be disseminated to various groups: (a) local and regional authorities of the Mexican health system and municipal authorities; (b) the participating communities will be informed in an assembly of the results and (c) academic dissemination will be done through publications in public science journals and institutional press releases and will also be presented at national and international congresses or symposia.
Muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) is an aggressive type of cancer. About 50% of patients will die from the disease within 5 years despite radical treatment. This implies that in many patients, the disease has already spread at the time of radical treatment, even though imaging shows no signs of metastasis. We hypothesise that the standard local staging method, transurethral resection of the bladder tumour (TURBT), is partly responsible for tumour cell spread. Furthermore, TURBT (and re-TURBT in many patients) contributes to a significant delay to definitive therapy. The aim of this randomised study is to determine whether multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) of the bladder, in combination with a single outpatient bladder tumour biopsy for histological confirmation, is a safer, faster, less costly and, therefore, more cost-effective diagnostic pathway than TURBT to detect or rule out MIBC.
BladParadigm is a two-arm multicentre randomised controlled trial (RCT) conducted in the Netherlands. Over a 3-year period, patients with clinically suspected MIBC without evidence of metastases will be recruited and randomised 1:1 to either TURBT or 3-Tesla mpMRI with same-day outpatient bladder biopsy. The Vesical Imaging Reporting and Data System (VI-RADS) will be used to standardise mpMRI reporting. Patients will undergo definitive treatment based on the results of the TURBT or mpMRI. The study is powered to demonstrate that the mpMRI-based strategy is at least non-inferior to standard TURBT in patients treated with radical cystectomy alone, assuming a relative hazard of 0.55. The required sample size is 360 patients (180 TURBT, 180 mpMRI). The primary outcome is 2-year progression-free survival. Progression will be assessed by imaging, according to the current standard of care. Secondary outcome measures are time to definitive treatment, quality of life (EuroQol 5D-5L), healthcare costs and cost-effectiveness.
This study has received ethical approval from the Medical Ethical Committee Oost-Nederland (NL83685.091.23). All participants will provide written informed consent prior to inclusion. Findings of this study will be disseminated through peer-reviewed, open-access publications, presentations at scientific conferences and stakeholder briefings.
To explore women's experience of the period after completion of cancer treatment for gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN): a descriptive exploratory study.
A descriptive exploratory qualitative study.
Women diagnosed with the rare pregnancy-related cancer GTN who had completed their treatment participated in semi-structured telephone interviews. Twenty-two interviews were conducted in June 2024 and digitally recorded and transcribed verbatim. The analysis used reflective thematic analysis.
Complex responses to treatment completion were revealed, described by some as a ‘double-edged sword’. The end of treatment routine, coupled with recovery from physical effects, left space for the impact of all they had experienced to ‘hit home’. Multiple concerns and losses were described, including issues relating to pregnancy, self-identity, confidence, fear of recurrence, work and relationships. Gaps in immediate post-treatment support services created challenges for recovery.
The study provides valuable insight into the physical, emotional and social impact of GTN experienced by patients following treatment. The findings highlight the importance of continuing support in the immediate post-treatment period. This study has identified ways in which services can be improved, recognising the need for an individual-tailored approach to reflect the complex responses of patients to treatment completion.
The findings reveal that many women begin to process the implications of their diagnosis and treatment following the completion of their treatment. The end of treatment can be a time when support from healthcare staff is reduced due to fewer routine contacts with healthcare staff. However, these findings suggest the need for nurses to ensure services continue to provide support during the post-treatment recovery phase.
The interview schedule was reviewed by women previously treated for GTN.
This study evaluates the effects of endotracheal suctioning duration on cerebral oxygenation and physiological parameters in preterm infants in intensive care.
Prospective and observational study.
In this study, 51 preterm infants born at 28–34 weeks of gestation in NICU were evaluated. Cerebral oxygenation was measured before, during, and after endotracheal suctioning with near-infrared spectroscopy. Pain levels of the infants were with N-PASS scale.
A negative correlation was found between the lowest cerebral oxygenation value during endotracheal suctioning and the duration of endotracheal suctioning. Cerebral oxygenation levels during endotracheal suctioning were lower than pre- and post-endotracheal suctioning levels. Higher cerebral oxygenation was observed in infants whose endotracheal aspiration time was less than 13 s. The duration of endotracheal suctioning was positively correlated with pain and cerebral oxygenation stabilization time.
Prolonged endotracheal suctioning duration negatively affects cerebral oxygenation in preterm infants. The study suggests an optimal endotracheal suctioning duration under 13 s.
Properly executed endotracheal suctioning, with the correct technique and knowledge, can alleviate the adverse physiological effects observed in preterm infants and contribute to routine nursing care in intensive care units.
This study has been reported in line with STROBE checklists.
No patient or public contribution was required to design or undertake this research. Patients contributed only to the data collection.
This study contributes to defining the ideal endotracheal aspiration duration, as there is not enough data so far. It showed the effect of prolonged endotracheal aspiration time on cerebral oxygenation, pain and physiological parameters in preterm infants.
To map key characteristics and describe nurse led models of care for the treatment of persons with substance use disorders (SUDs) in the outpatient setting.
A scoping review.
Conducted in accordance with the JBI methodology. The PRISMA-ScR checklist was used.
Pubmed, CINAHL Complete (EBSCOhost), Cochrane Library, APA PsycNet and Scopus were searched from 1999 to May 2022 and updated on 28 November 2023. A handsearch and a grey literature search was conducted.
Title and abstract screening was performed on 774 articles resulting in 88 articles for full text screening. Full text screening yielded 13 articles that met inclusion criteria.
Existing nurse-led models of care for SUDS are scarce and limited in scope, with the majority focused on treating opioid use disorder. Additional research is needed to develop, test, and implement efficacious nurse-led models of care for the treatment and management of SUDs.
Nurse led models of care have demonstrated their efficacy and quality in the management of other chronic diseases. As we move forward with innovative solutions for individuals with addiction, nurse led models of care can be a mechanism to deliver high quality, evidence-based care for SUDs.
SUDs are chronic diseases that impact individuals, families, and communities. SUDs require a biopsychosocial approach to treatment. Globally, nurses are well positioned to provide high quality care to mitigate the impact of SUDs. This scoping review mapped the extant literature on nurse led models of care for substance use disorder treatment in the outpatient setting finding that additional research is needed to develop, test and implement evidence-based interventions to care for individuals, families, and communities experiencing SUDs.
PRISMA checklist for scoping reviews.
No patient or public contribution were part of this study.
Open Science Framework accessible at: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/NSW7V.
To explore the long-term impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on nurse alcohol consumption.
The COVID-19 pandemic has caused immense disruption to healthcare services worldwide, and nurses have not been immune, experiencing burnout, declining mental health and ultimately, attrition from the profession. Increases in alcohol consumption have been reported across subsections of society, including those with pre-existing mental ill health and experiencing high stress, and exploring this phenomenon in nurses is essential for workforce well-being and sustainability.
Qualitative descriptive study design.
Secondary analysis of individual, semi-structured interviews with nurses (N = 42) from diverse settings across Australia, including community, primary and hospital settings, conducted in July and August 2021. Data were analysed using structural coding and reported in accordance with the CORE-Q guidelines.
Two key themes were found after analysis of the data: (1) factors influencing alcohol consumption (subthemes: workplace factors and external factors), and (2) the pandemic's influence on alcohol consumption (subthemes: increased consumption, moderation of consumption and alcohol as a reward).
Several participants described increased alcohol consumption because of the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly due to the stress of working in an environment where resources were scarce. Workplace factors such as overtime, missed breaks and heightened workload were all described as driving stress, and in turn increased alcohol consumption.
Increased alcohol consumption has been associated with burnout, absenteeism and intention to leave. The nursing profession is currently undergoing significant continuing stress providing care and management to patients with the SARS-CoV-2 virus, and increased alcohol consumption is a significant threat to personal and workforce well-being, workforce sustainability and quality nursing care.
Objetivo principal: Evaluar la disfunción familiar desde una perspectiva holística en enfermos renales en terapia sustitutiva en un hospital de Monterrey, México. Metodología: Diseño mixto, analítico, transversal. Población conformada por 634 enfermos renales en terapias de sustitución de un hospital de segundo nivel en Monterrey. Se usó estadística descriptiva e inferencial para datos cuantitativos. Para la parte cualitativa se usó metodología fenomenológica conforme a la teoría fundamentada y análisis de dominios. Resultados principales: Alta prevalencia de disfuncionalidad familiar (70%). Según los enfermos renales en etapas avanzadas, el abandono por parte del cónyuge, la infidelidad marital, la exclusión familiar y los problemas económicos, son los principales factores que fracturan los lazos y la estruc-tura familiar. Conclusión principal: La enfermedad renal puede ser factor de disfuncionalidad familiar, hecho que compromete las relacio-nes entre los miembros familiares y afecta el apego a los tratamientos sustitutivos, al ser estos dependientes de un cuidador primario.
FreshRSS 