Conectar
To describe the implementation determinants for care coordination interventions in a hospital context.
Systematic review.
This review was guided by the Consolidated Framework of Implementation Research (CFIR), assessed for quality using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool and reported with the PRISMA guidelines.
CINHAL Complete, EMBASE, MEDLINE Complete, PsychINFO (between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2022, and updated May 09, 2024) and a manual reference list search of all included studies.
The search returned 5614 articles after duplicates were removed. After title and abstract screening, 264 articles underwent full-text review. Sixteen studies (15 care coordination models) met the inclusion criteria. The CFIR inner setting domain and the implementation process domain were the most prominent domains and ‘Partnerships & Connections’, ‘Work Infrastructure’, ‘Capability’ and ‘Reflecting and Evaluating’ subdomains emerged as important determinants across the included studies.
Inconsistent findings relating to care coordination outcomes are likely to be substantially influenced by the complexity and heterogeneity of the interventions and variations in implementation and contextual factors. Intra- and inter-organisational relationships were important to connect previously disconnected parts of the health system and were facilitated by experienced care coordinators. Continual improvement was also important to increase fit with contextual factors. More high-quality studies are needed to identify commonalities and provide generalisable principles and characteristics associated with high-performance implementation.
Review findings will provide practitioners, policymakers, and researchers with a comprehensive synthesis of evidence underpinning implementation of effective community care coordination from hospital settings.
These review findings will inform the effective implementation of care coordination interventions in a hospital context for patients with complex multimorbidity.
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis.
PROSPERO Registration: CRD42022376642.
No patient or public Contribution.
To increase Chlamydia trachomatis screening in adolescents 15–19 years of age from 7.8% to 15% following a 6-week implementation of universal chlamydia screening at three paediatric primary care (PPC) sites.
Pre-implementation (1 January 2022–19 October 2022) and post-implementation (20 October 2022–1 June 2023) screening rates were tracked through run charts and compared via Chi-square testing. Universal opt-out chlamydia screening with universal urine collection for 15- to 19-year-old was implemented at well visits, along with patient and staff education, and sexually transmitted infection treatment protocols.
Chlamydia trachomatis screening increased from 7.8% to 34.1% with implementation of universal opt-out chlamydia screening. Proportions of patients screened increased significantly among White individuals, males and privately insured individuals.
A universal C. trachomatis screening project can be feasibly implemented in pediatric primary care and successfully increase adolescent chlamydia screening rates.
Implementing a universal opt-out C. trachomatis screening project is feasible in PPC and can help achieve the public health goal of chlamydia identification and treatment.
These findings will be impactful for both paediatric primary care and adolescent patients. The universal, opt-out C. trachomatis screening approach facilitated screening increases, improved equity in screening and led to increased case detection and treatment which has vast significance for those patients.
This manuscript is submitted using the SQUIRE 2.0 guidelines for quality improvement reporting.
Patient contribution included de-identified data collection of chlamydia screening rates of eligible adolescents 15–19 years old who attended routine well visits at the three PPC locations. The data were reviewed on a dashboard, then stratified by race, ethnicity, payor and sex assigned at birth.
FreshRSS 