FreshRSS

🔒
❌ Acerca de FreshRSS
Hay nuevos artículos disponibles. Pincha para refrescar la página.
AnteayerTus fuentes RSS

Promoting resident thriving in nursing homes: A qualitative study

Abstract

Aim

To explore how staff promote resident thriving in an Australian nursing home.

Design

Qualitative research design using content analysis.

Methods

Interviews were held with 14 nursing staff working in an Australian nursing home in March/April 2018. Data were analysed using qualitative content analysis.

Results

Four themes were revealed: promoting personalized care; promoting opportunities for autonomy; promoting connection and meaning; and promoting a curated environment.

Conclusions

Staff promoted resident thriving in relation to everyday care, activities, capabilities, relationships and the lived environment. Interventions that were perceived to promote thriving were described relative to the nurse, the resident, the care team and the wider nursing home context.

Implications for the Profession and/or Patient Care

The findings provide novel insight into the understanding and application of the concept of thriving in long-term care from nursing staffs' perspective.

Impact

What Problem did the Study Address?

Nursing home staff are uniquely positioned to support resident thriving through person-centred care, yet little is known about how staff support promotion of thriving for nursing home residents in their everyday practice.

What were the Main Findings?

Nursing home staff perceived that they promoted thriving by personalizing care and supporting autonomy, connection, meaning and pleasure for residents.

Where and on Whom will the Research have an Impact?

These findings are of interest for the clinicians, educators and researchers who develop, implement and evaluate interventions to improve place-related well-being in nursing homes.

Reporting Method

CORE-Q checklist.

Patient or Public Contribution

No patient or public contribution occurred for this study as this research focused on exploring staffs' perspectives from the specific viewpoint of their personal experience.

The relationship between sensory impairment and home care client's received care time—A cross‐sectional study

Abstract

Aim

The aim of this study was to explore the relationship between sensory impairment and home care client's received care time.

Design

A cross-sectional multi-source study.

Methods

Data from a self-reported staff survey on care time allocation were merged with registry data from the Resident Assessment Instrument registry (n = 1477). The data were collected during 1 week from 17 home care units in Finland in October 2021. The relationship between sensory impairment and clients received care time was examined using linear regression analyses.

Results

The linear regression analyses showed that having vision impairment alone increased care time, while dual sensory impairment resulted in decreased received care time. Hearing impairment alone was not statistically significantly associated with care time.

Conclusion

The holistic care need of home care clients with dual sensory impairment may not be adequate. To ensure equality and the individually tailored care of clients, further attention must be paid to clients with sensory impairments, especially those with dual sensory impairment. Furthermore, the competence of home care workers to encounter and communicate with clients with sensory impairment must be developed to support the holistic care.

Implications for the patient care

The sensory impairments of home care clients must be identified in time and considered in care planning and encountering clients.

Impact

As there is a risk that clients with dual sensory impairment are not able to fully express themselves, it is imperative that further attention is paid to clients with sensory impairments, to better understand and support this vulnerable group. Increased awareness and continuous education are needed to better identify and support home care clients with sensory impairment.

Reporting Method

The study adheres to the STROBE reporting guidelines.

Patient or public contribution

No patient or public contribution.

❌