Healthcare utilisation (HU) is key to improving the health of residents in urban informal settlements. This study aimed to explore household-level factors influencing HU among informal settlement households in Freetown, Sierra Leone.

Cross-sectional survey.

Three informal settlements (Cockle Bay, Dwarzark and Moyiba) in Freetown, Sierra Leone.

Primary data from 4871 households were collected during the Health and Wellbeing survey conducted between April and May 2023, targeting households with adults aged 18 years and older.

The primary outcomes were households HU both within and outside informal settlements. Household-level predisposing and enabling explanatory variables were derived from Andersen’s Behavioural Model of HU.

Disability in households increases HU within settlements (especially in Dwarzark, 13% and Moyiba, 10%) but is less likely outside. Households engaged in income-generating activities are more likely to seek healthcare within settlements, but 12% less likely outside in Cockle Bay and Dwarzark. Food insecurity decreases HU within Dwarzark (9%) and increases HU outside by 174% in Moyiba. Longer water fetching times and water shortages were associated with higher HU (between 6% and 16%) within settlements, especially in Cockle Bay and Dwarzark. Clean water sources (eg, piped dwelling, bowser, surface, bottled) were consistently associated with higher HU both within and outside settlements. Shared sanitation facilities (such as shared toilets) were positively associated with HU both within and outside settlements, particularly in Dwarzark and Moyiba. Households with income from fishing, informal salaried work and bike riding showed higher HU both within and outside settlements, especially in Dwarzark and Moyiba.

We identified strong settlement-specific patterns of household-level factors that influence HU both within and outside Freetown’s informal settlements. These findings provide a foundation for developing targeted policies such as strengthening local services, addressing affordability and accessibility barriers and supporting vulnerable occupation groups.

To study the factors that influence physicians’ and patients’ use of, and willingness to use, economic information in clinical decision-making, and examine physicians’ views on whether clinical practice guidelines can support its use.

Semistructured focus group discussions with an inductive content analysis.

Finnish health centre general practitioners (GPs) and adult patient representatives, five groups of each.

22 GPs and 15 patient representatives.

In the GP groups, five factors involved in using economic information in clinical decisions were raised: the issue of who pays, knowledge about cost information, the cost-benefit ratio of treatments, care planning and health economic understanding. Concerning the inclusion of economic information in clinical guidelines, GPs raised themes including the content and means of presentation of economic information, and advantages and challenges related to the integration of economic information into clinical guidelines. In the patient groups, the identified themes related to seeing the costs of treatments, the organisation of healthcare services, inclusion of cost information in clinical guidelines, patient information and support, and cost containment in healthcare.

The study suggests that GPs and patients are willing to use economic information in clinical decision making. It also implies a need for easily accessible and understandable economic information, and that clinical guidelines may be a good way to support this. In addition, the study highlights the need for education on the economic aspects of healthcare for physicians.

To determine the safety and efficacy of ruxolitinib (RUX) and fostamatinib (FOS) compared with standard of care (SOC) in patients requiring hospital admission for the treatment of COVID-19 pneumonia.

Adaptive multiarm, multistage, randomised, open-label trial (three arm, two stage).

Five hospitals in England between October 2020 and September 2022.

Hospitalised patients (≥18 years) with COVID-19 pneumonia defined by a modified WHO COVID-19 severity grade of 3 or 4.

Participants were randomly assigned 1:1:1 to receive RUX (10 mg two times per day for 7 days then 5 mg two times per day for 7 days), FOS (150 mg two times per day for 7 days then 100 mg two times per day for 7 days) or SOC.

Primary outcome was development of severe COVID-19 pneumonia (modified WHO severity grade≥5) within 14 days of randomisation. Secondary outcomes included mortality, invasive and non-invasive ventilation, venous thromboembolism, duration of hospital stay, readmissions, inflammatory markers and serious adverse events (SAEs).

At stage 1, 181 patients were randomised, with 4 assessed as ineligible post randomisation. FOS was stopped early for futility with 16 participants (27.6%, n=58) developing severe COVID-19 pneumonia compared with 15 (25.0%, n=60) in the SOC arm (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) compared with SOC: 1.12; 95% CI 0.49 to 2.58; p=0.608). RUX progressed to stage 2 but the trial was stopped early due to slow recruitment. At the final analysis, 10 participants (16.1%, n=62) developed severe COVID-19 pneumonia in the RUX arm compared with 15 (24.6%, n=61) in the SOC arm (aOR: 0.63; 95% CI 0.25 to 1.57; p=0.161). Four (7.4%) participants in the FOS arm, none in the RUX arm and three (5.5%) in the SOC arm died within 14 days of randomisation. Infections were the most frequently reported SAE and were numerically higher in the FOS (10, 17.2%) and RUX (10, 16.1%) arms compared with SOC (7, 11.5%). Two unexpected serious adverse reactions occurred in the RUX arm only.

We found no evidence that FOS was superior to SOC for the treatment of COVID-19 pneumonia in patients requiring hospital admission. Due to early stopping, the trial was underpowered to establish RUX’s effect in this population. Further study is needed.

NCT04581954; EUDRA-CT: https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/trial/2020-001750-22/GB.

Fever is the leading reason for consultation among children in general practice. 20% of febrile children require additional tests to distinguish between viral infections and severe bacterial infections. Point of care capillary C-reactive protein (POC CRP) testing provides on-site results within 5 min but remains underutilised in primary care settings in France. This study will demonstrate how the use of POC CRP could optimise the care pathway for febrile children, saving time for physicians and patients, and making economic savings.

This is a multicentre, prospective, cluster-randomised stepped-wedge trial that will take place from September 2025 to March 2026. The required sample size is estimated at 420 patients. The primary outcome is the difference in referral rates to facilities equipped for emergency laboratory testing (medical biology laboratories, emergency departments) when using POC CRP versus standard care. The study will be conducted in primary care practices and out-of-hours clinics in south France among febrile children aged 3 months to 15 years, over the 6-month viral and bacterial epidemic period. A cost-consequence analysis and a budget impact assessment will also be performed.

The protocol was approved by the Ile de France VII Committee for the Protection of Persons (2024-A02844-43), the French Advisory Board on Medical Research Data Processing and the French Personal Data Protection Authority. The study was prospectively registered on clinicaltrials.gov.

NCT06910631.

The management of active patients with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis (KnOA) who are too young for total knee arthroplasty poses a specific challenge to clinicians. Research studies show that improving quadriceps muscle strength improves pain and function; however, aspects of the disease render it difficult for patients to achieve and maintain improvements. Recombinant human growth hormone (rHGH) is shown to increase the magnitude and duration of muscle growth when combined with exercise treatment in adult populations. Hence, rHGH combined with physical therapy may provide meaningful benefits in the treatment of KnOA.

This is a single-centre, double-blind, randomised trial to pilot a future Phase III trial from 2025 to 2028. Participants are aged 18–60 with clinical and radiographic evidence of isolated degenerative arthritis of the knee (patellofemoral or tibiofemoral). The investigational product is rHGH (Saizen (somatropin of rDNA origin, EMD Serono)) and a saline placebo. Participants will deliver the solution via subcutaneous injection area once per day at a dose of 0.5 mg HGH per body surface area (0.5 mg/m²) for 6 weeks, alongside participation in a lower limb strengthening programme developed by rehabilitation specialists. 17 participants will be recruited into each study arm.

The primary outcomes are feasibility (compliance with the study drug regimen for the 6-week administration period and enrolment rate) and safety (the proportion of minor and major adverse events between groups). The primary endpoint for these outcomes will be at 6 weeks. The secondary outcomes are knee extension strength, knee flexion strength, radiographic arthritis progression, thigh muscle circumference, MRI-measured quadriceps muscle volume and patient-reported outcome measures (Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), SF-20 and Tegner). The primary endpoint for these outcomes will be at 12 weeks, and the final endpoint will be 24 months, where final radiographic (X-ray) assessment will take place.

The primary outcome of compliance will be a calculation of mean compliance between groups, which can be analysed as a t-test after the treatment period. A two-sample, two-sided t-test will compare the clinical (secondary) outcome of greatest interest: knee extension strength at baseline versus week 6 compared between treatment groups. Other secondary outcomes will be compared using a simple linear mixed-effects model. The ² test will be used to determine whether the number of participants who made meaningful changes was different between groups. The null hypotheses are that the rHGH and placebo groups will have no difference in compliance rates, safety events, knee extension strength at 12 weeks and arthritis grade progression at 24 months.

This study has been approved by the Sunnybrook Research Institute Research and Ethics Board (#6427) and received a no-objection letter from Health Canada Clinical Trials. The primary sponsor is the Sunnybrook Centre for Clinical Trial Studies (CCTS). The findings of this study will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at orthopaedic conferences.

NCT07036003.

Glucocorticoid therapy is prescribed for a variety of inflammatory conditions and is associated with severe adverse effects. A glucocorticoid withdrawal syndrome (GWS) may occur after prolonged glucocorticoid treatment—with or without biochemical glucocorticoid-induced adrenal insufficiency (GIAI). Previously, GWS was not considered an entity, probably due to the overlap between symptoms of GWS and GIAI. The Addison’s disease-specific quality of life questionnaire (AddiQoL-30) is a validated tool for quantifying symptoms of adrenal insufficiency resembling GWS. In the present study, we test the hypothesis that patients with a low AddiQoL-30 score and/or low cortisol response to a short Synacthen test (SST), after cessation of prednisolone treatment, may benefit from low-dose hydrocortisone therapy without increasing the risk of metabolic and cardiovascular disease during prolonged cortisol exposure.

REPLACE is a multi-centre, double-blinded, placebo-controlled randomised controlled trial in patients with polymyalgia rheumatica or giant cell arteritis after cessation of prednisolone treatment. Criteria for randomisation are an AddiQoL-30 score ≤85 and/or plasma cortisol response to SST, 30-min p-cortisol >100 and 85; and (2) patients with a SST-stimulated cortisol ≤100 nmol/L.

The study is conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, registered at the Clinical Trials Information System (CTIS: 2024-513822-53-00) and Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05193396), and publications will be in accordance with the recommendations of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. The trial is monitored by local independent Good Clinical Practice units and overseen by the Danish Data Protection Agency (journal no. 21/27119), the Regional Committees on Health Research Ethics for Southern Denmark (project ID: S-20210076), the Danish Patient Safety Authority and the Danish Medicines Agency.

NCT05193396.

Suicide rates have increased over the last couple of decades globally, particularly in the United States and among populations with lower economic status who present at safety-net healthcare systems. Recently, predictive models for suicide risk have shown promise; however, a model for this specific population does not exist.

To develop a predictive risk model of suicide and intentional self-harm (ISH) for patients presenting at the psychiatric emergency department (ED) of JPS Health Network, a safety net medical and mental healthcare system in Texas.

The study used structured and unstructured electronic medical record (EMR) data (2015–2019) and local medical examiner data (2015–2020) to create predictors and outcome variables. All psychiatric ED notes during calendar years 2018 and 2019 were reviewed using natural language processing to identify presentations for any level of self-harm and subsequent manual review of identified visits to accurately classify ED presentations for treatment of an act of intentional self-harm meeting study criteria. Data from 15 987 patients were used to develop and validate a machine learning-based predictive model that leverages rolling window methodology to predict risk repeatedly across a patient’s trajectory. Feature engineering played a prominent role in defining new predictors.

The best model (XGBoost) achieved the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.81 for 30-day predictions and demonstrated concentration of ISH and suicide attempt events in high-risk quantiles of risk (65% had events in top 0.1% quantile). The predicted risk can be translated into a propensity of events (80% at the highest predicted risk) to facilitate clinical interpretation.

Machine learning-based models can be used with standard EMRs to identify patients presenting at the psychiatric ED with a high risk of ISH and suicide attempts within the next 30 days.

Integration of a predictive model can significantly aid clinical decision-making in safety-net psychiatric EDs.

Hypotension is a frequent complication after induction of general anaesthesia leading to end-organ injury, for which elderly and multimorbid patients are particularly susceptible. The extent of hypotension depends, among other factors, on the dose and rate of propofol administration. Target-controlled infusion systems are widely used to administer short-acting anaesthetics such as propofol and remifentanil. Commonly, induction is started with a fixed effect-site concentration. Titration, an alternative method of induction using an incremental augmentation of propofol, leads to a reduced induction dose and rate of propofol. We hypothesise that the titration method improves haemodynamic stability compared with conventional induction.

This multicentre, expertise-based randomised controlled trial takes place at four Swiss hospitals. Patients ≥55 years of age undergoing non-cardiac surgery under general anaesthesia using propofol target-controlled infusion are randomised to either a conventional or a titrated anaesthesia induction method. Patients, statisticians and, if resources allow, outcome assessors will be blinded. The primary endpoint is the mean arterial pressure under the individual baseline mean arterial pressure (area under threshold) during the first 30 min after start of induction. Secondary endpoints include the maximum deviation from baseline mean arterial pressure, haemodynamic rescue methods, propofol consumption and neurocognitive recovery after regaining consciousness.

A total of 320 patients are required to have an 80% chance of observing superiority of titration for the area under the threshold as significant at the 5% level, assuming a true difference of 100 mm Hg*min. The area under threshold and the maximum deviation will be compared between arms using mixed linear regression models.

Ethical approval has been obtained from all responsible ethics committees (BASEC2025-01007). The results will be presented at international meetings and published in peer-reviewed journals and may contribute to a change in clinical practice for anaesthesia induction using target-controlled infusion systems with propofol.

clinicaltrials.gov (NCT06980688) and www.humanforschung-schweiz.ch (HumRes67022).

First Nations, Inuit and Métis Peoples in Canada continue to face significant disparities in healthcare access compared with non-Indigenous populations. Understanding their experiences in accessing healthcare is essential for addressing systemic barriers and promoting equitable, patient-centred care. Although existing studies have identified various barriers and facilitators to accessing healthcare, a lack of synthesised qualitative evidence delves into the intricacies of patients’ experiences. This systematic review aims to investigate Indigenous patients’ experiences with mainstream Canadian healthcare services and their recommendations for service improvement through a meta-synthesis of qualitative literature.

Meta-aggregation will be used to conduct a systematic review of qualitative studies and qualitative components of mixed-methods studies exploring experiences of Indigenous patients accessing mainstream healthcare services in Canada. Papers published in English will be searched using electronic databases, including MEDLINE, APA PsycINFO, CINAHL, Global Health, the Bibliography of Indigenous Peoples in North America and Web of Science. A comprehensive list of non-indexed and grey literature will also be searched to ensure the inclusion of community-based and non-peer-reviewed evidence. Studies meeting the inclusion criteria will be assessed for methodological quality using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Checklist for Qualitative Research and the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Quality Appraisal Tool. The review will involve the extraction of findings, categorisation into themes and synthesis into broader insights guided by the JBI meta-aggregation approach. An Indigenous advisory committee will guide the process, including interpretation of findings and ensuring alignment with Indigenous health research principles.

Ethics approval is not required for this study as it is based on a secondary analysis of publicly available primary studies. The completed review will be published in a peer-reviewed manuscript. Findings will also be shared with relevant Indigenous organisations and community partners through plain-language summaries and community-engaged knowledge-sharing activities.

CRD420250656486.

The digital transformation of healthcare has created an urgent need for primary care physicians (PCPs) to acquire competencies in digital health. However, the structure and scope of postgraduate training programmes remain poorly defined and unevenly implemented worldwide, and no scoping review has yet synthesised the evidence. This review aims to map existing postgraduate digital health training programmes for PCPs, including their content, structure and delivery approaches.

This scoping review will follow the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology and adhere to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews checklist. A systematic search will be conducted across five databases (PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, ScienceDirect and Web of Science) and relevant grey literature, covering publications from January 2019 to June 2025. Studies describing postgraduate digital health training programmes for PCPs will be eligible for inclusion. Data will be extracted and synthesised descriptively and thematically using an inductive approach.

As this study is based on a review of publicly available literature, ethical approval is not required. The findings will be disseminated through a peer-reviewed publication and conference presentations and will inform future curriculum development and policy in digital health education for PCPs. The results may also inform national curriculum reforms and accreditation standards, supporting more consistent and competency-based digital health education globally.

This scoping review protocol has been registered with the Open Science Framework.

This study aimed to determine the prevalence and factors associated with pre-diabetes and undiagnosed type 2 diabetes (UDD) in Cambodia.

This analysis used data from the WHO World Health Survey Plus, which was collected using a cross-sectional design with a GIS-based, three-stage sampling approach. Multiple logistic regression was used to identify key associated factors, based on a significance level of p

Data were collected from all 25 provinces in Cambodia between 12 March 2023 and 31 May 2023.

4427 individuals aged 18 years or older, residing in the selected household for at least 6 months in the past year.

Pre-diabetes (Haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) 5.7%–6.4%) and UDD (HbA1c≥6.5%), without prior knowledge of having type 2 diabetes (T2D).

The weighted prevalences of pre-diabetes and UDD were 26.4% (95% CI 24.0% to 29.0%) and 9.3% (95% CI 7.9% to 11.0%). Pre-diabetes prevalence was higher in urban areas compared with rural areas (adjusted OR, aOR=1.2, 95% CI 1.0 to 1.4), males (aOR=1.7, 95% CI 1.3 to 2.3), individuals aged 40–49 (aOR=1.8, 95% CI 1.4 to 2.4), individuals aged 50+ years group (aOR=2.9, 95% CI 2.3 to 3.6) compared with the 18–39 years group, overweight individuals (aOR=1.7, 95% CI 1.4 to 2.0), obese (aOR=2.1, 95% CI 1.5 to 3.0) and those with elevated total triglycerides (aOR=1.3, 95% CI 1.1 to 1.5). Similar risk factors were identified for UDD, with the addition of hypertension (aOR=1.6, 95% CI 1.3 to 2.0) and high waist circumference (aOR=2.0, 95% CI 1.5 to 2.7).

The high prevalence of pre-diabetes and UDD in Cambodia is a pressing public health concern. Urgent and intensive interventions are needed to effectively prevent and manage T2D, particularly among urban residents, older persons and individuals with metabolic risk factors.

Published clinical trials offer valuable insights into the clinical research landscape in Portuguese-speaking African countries (PSAC)—Angola, Cabo Verde, Guinea-Bissau, São Tomé and Príncipe and Mozambique. The objective of this comprehensive scoping review is to systematically map and analyse randomised clinical trials (RCTs) evaluating pharmacological interventions conducted in PSAC from 1995 to 2024, in order to identify research trends, targeted diseases, geographic distribution and evidence gaps to better understand the development and evolution of clinical trials in the region. This is the first comprehensive scoping review to examine the clinical trials landscape in PSAC.

This scoping review adheres to the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews, which builds on the Arksey and O’Malley methodological framework (refined by Levac et al) and will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines. A dual-search strategy will be used, consulting 4 electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, African Index Medicus, Cochrane Central Register of Clinical Trials) and 3 clinical trials registries platforms (Clinicaltrials.gov, International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, Pan African Clinical Trials Registry). Eligible studies will include RCTs conducted in at least one of the PSAC. Extracted data will include trial characteristics, targeted diseases, phases and designs, funding and ethical compliance. Risk of bias (RoB) will be assessed using the Cochrane RoB tool V.2.0 to evaluate the quality of the evidence included in the scoping review. Conclusions will be drawn upon the comparison between countries and their scope of clinical research, together with comparison with countries from other geographies, considering disease profiles.

Ethical approval is not required. Results will be disseminated through a peer-reviewed publication, conference presentation and in plain language in social media, both in Portuguese and in English.

This protocol is registered in the Open Science Framework https://osf.io/5nhc9.

This study aims to describe the characteristics of hospitalised COVID-19 patients in a tertiary care hospital close to an international airport in Japan and to compare these characteristics among different waves during the pandemic.

Retrospective observational study.

Tertiary care centre in Japan.

All patients diagnosed with COVID-19 who were hospitalised between January 2020 and April 2022 were included.

Clinical characteristics, characteristics of admission, treatments and outcomes were investigated and compared among six pandemic waves.

A total of 827 patients were included. The median age was 58.0 years. More than half of the patients (58.3%) had at least one comorbidity. The majority of patients (89.0%) were domestically infected patients admitted under the Infectious Diseases Law, while the remaining patients (11.0%) were those diagnosed during airport quarantine and admitted under the Quarantine Act. Hospital-acquired COVID-19 infection occurred in 7.0% of cases, and mainly during the sixth wave. Overall, some form of oxygen therapy, high-flow oxygen devices, invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation was provided in 46.3%, 10.4%, 4.5% and 1.5% of cases, respectively. Only 1.8% of patients were treated in the intensive care unit (ICU), and 59.5% of patients on IMV were managed in the non-ICU ward. The in-hospital mortality rate was 5.8%. Median age, percentages of some comorbidities, vaccination coverage, medications for COVID-19, types of supportive care and ICU admissions differed significantly among waves.

This study suggests that patient characteristics, vaccination coverage, standard of treatment and severity of illness changed across waves during the COVID-19 pandemic. Intensive care delivery in non-ICU wards was unavoidable due to limited ICU capacity, which may be a key consideration when preparing for future pandemics.

Each year, millions of people experience recurrent diverticulitis episodes. Elective sigmoid colon resection reduces the risk of recurrence, but The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons recommends individualising surgical decisions based on the impact of the condition on a patient’s quality of life (QoL). However, no threshold for QoL impairment has been established to guide decision-making, and evidence comparing elective colectomy with medical management in terms of QoL limitation is limited. To address these gaps and to guide treatment decision-making, we designed the Comparison of Surgery and Medicine on the Impact of Diverticulitis (COSMID) trial.

The COSMID trial is a large, pragmatic randomised trial including patients with QoL-limiting diverticulitis that aims to determine if partial colectomy is superior to medical management and explore subgroups that are more likely to respond to each treatment.

COSMID will recruit 250 English-speaking and Spanish-speaking adults with imaging-confirmed and QoL-limiting diverticulitis (defined using a modified diverticulitis-related QoL survey). Participants are randomly assigned to undergo elective partial colectomy or receive comprehensive medical management (eg, selected from options including fibre, probiotics, mesalamine and rifaximin). A total of 100 patients who decline randomisation but consent to follow-up will be included in a parallel observational cohort. The primary outcome is the time-averaged score of the Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index at 6, 9 and 12 months after randomisation. Secondary outcomes include clinical adverse events, healthcare utilisation, recurrent episodes of diverticulitis and additional patient-reported outcomes like the Diverticulitis Quality of Life instrument, decisional regret and work productivity. Exploratory analyses aim to identify differential treatment effects based on patients’ characteristics.

This trial was approved by the Vanderbilt Institutional Review Board (IRB) on 26 August 2019 (IRB #191217). Vanderbilt serves as the institutional review board of record for the following study sites: Albany Medical College, Allegheny Health, Atrium Health Carolinas Medical Center, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Boston University Medical Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, UT Health Lyndon B. Johnson Hospital, Medical University of South Carolina, New York-Presbyterian Queens, Stanford University, University of Pennsylvania, University of California San Diego, University of California San Francisco, University of Colorado Denver, University of Florida, University of Iowa, University of Utah, University of Washington Medical Center, University of South Florida, University of Rochester Medical Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Lahey Hospital & Medical Center, Weill Cornell Medical Center and Northwell Health. Rush University Medical Center (approved 8 January 2020), Columbia University Medical Center (approved 28 January 2020), Northwestern University (approved 19 March 2020), Mount Carmel Health System (approved 5 May 2020) and Memorial Health University Medical Center (approved 4 April 2022) are regulated and were approved by their respective IRBs. Results from this trial will be presented at international conferences and published in peer-reviewed journals.

NCT04095663.