This study aims to investigate the lived experiences of civilians in Lahore during the 2025 India–Pakistan conflict, focusing on psychological distress, social disruption, coping mechanisms and perceptions of national response and preparedness.

The study employs an exploratory phenomenological approach.

The study has been conducted in Lahore, the capital city of Punjab, the largest by population province of Pakistan. Lahore was selected as a research site due to its historical, strategic and political significance in Indo-Pak conflicts.

Data were collected from 10 participants aged 18 or above years, who lived in Lahore between April and May 2025, and were willing to discuss personal, social or psychological experiences related to the conflict. In-depth, semistructured interviews were conducted in Urdu, transcribed, and were thematically analysed using both manual and NVivo V.12 software-supported coding.

Seven inter-related themes were identified. Participants reported intense anxiety, hypervigilance and insomnia driven by hybrid warfare tactics, including misinformation, drone sightings and media sensationalism. Social life was disrupted through withdrawal from public, religious and communal activities. Coping strategies included religious faith, family cohesion, humour and expressions of national solidarity. Notably, many participants experienced psychosomatic symptoms such as palpitations, gastrointestinal distress and stress-induced fever. A prominent finding was the absence of civilian preparedness guidance, which amplified fear and uncertainty during the escalation.

The conflicts, although short lived and geographical restrained, casts a long psychological and social on civilians, marked by fear, uncertainty, social disruption and dissatisfaction with institutional preparedness. While some coping and resilience were evident, the findings highlight the need to strengthen civilian-focused public health responses during periods of conflict escalation, including mental health awareness, media literacy and community-level support within Pakistan’s emergency response frameworks.

This study assessed the feasibility of implementing a phase 3 field-based clinical trial protocol to evaluate paediatric praziquantel (PED-PZQ) for the treatment of Schistosoma mansoni infection in children aged 3 months to 6 years in endemic areas of Brazil, focusing on operational aspects such as recruitment logistics, documentation management, investigational product handling and protocol adherence.

Pilot and feasibility study for a phase 3 clinical trial, comprising two components: a randomised, open-label, parallel-group, two-arm trial and a single-arm trial.

Conde, Bahia, Brazil, from December 2024 to January 2025.

Two trials aim to screen 5774 participants from three rural areas in Bahia and three in Sergipe, states in northeastern Brazil, and enrol 403 children eligible for either randomisation or allocation. Trial 1 will randomise (1:1 ratio) 240 children aged 4–6 years into the PED-PZQ treatment arm or the standard praziquantel (PZQ) 1. Trial 2 will enrol 163 children aged 3 months to 3 years, all receiving PED-PZQ. Both trials are open label. Eligible participants shall meet age criteria, test positive for S. mansoni and fulfil other inclusion criteria. In the first recruiting centre, Conde (Bahia), it was estimated that 650 participants would need to be screened for trial 1 and 552 for trial 2, assuming schistosomiasis prevalence of 5% and 4%, respectively. This pilot study reports on the first 60 participants enrolled.

The primary outcome of this pilot study is the feasibility of implementing the research protocol in a real-world field setting, focusing on key aspects such as study documentation challenges, participant safety, investigational medicinal product custody chain and protocol adherence. In addition to providing preliminary data on the parasitological cure rate, secondary outcomes include the prevalence of S. mansoni infection and the reduction in S. mansoni egg count (Kato-Katz method). Furthermore, the occurrence and severity of drug-related adverse events are monitored from drug administration to day 21 post-treatment, alongside changes in renal, hepatic and cardiac functions assessed through biochemical markers.

A total of 60 participants were recruited, and 55 provided stool samples for screening. The pilot phase demonstrated the feasibility of implementing the clinical protocol under field conditions, with successful completion of all planned procedures and minimal protocol deviations. Operational challenges were identified mainly in documentation processes, participant recruitment and investigational product management and were addressed through preventive and corrective quality assurance actions. The experience also highlighted logistical and infrastructural barriers typical of field-based trials in remote endemic areas, which informed adjustments for the subsequent phase 3 study. Preliminary parasitological results indicated an overall S. mansoni prevalence of 9.1% (5/55), with 21% in trial 1 and 2.8% in trial 2. All infected participants met the eligibility criteria, received treatment and completed follow-up. Four achieved a parasitological cure, and one case of treatment failure was observed (trial 1, PZQ group). Two mild adverse events (diarrhoea) were reported, with no serious complications or clinically significant changes in biochemical parameters.

This pilot study demonstrated the feasibility of implementing a field-based phase 3 clinical trial protocol for PED-PZQ in endemic areas of Brazil. The findings confirm that the protocol can be successfully applied in primary care settings, despite operational challenges related to recruitment, logistics and documentation. The study also provided preliminary evidence supporting the safety and effectiveness of the paediatric formulation and highlighted the need to revise prevalence assumptions to improve future screening strategies. Overall, the experience offers valuable insights to guide the large-scale phase 3 trial and supports the incorporation of PED-PZQ into national schistosomiasis control policies.

Brazilian Clinical Trials Registry; RBR-86kcy37.

This study aims to identify factors associated with early antenatal care (ANC) initiation using a survival analysis approach applied to nationally representative data.

This study used a cross-sectional design based on data from the nationally representative 2022 Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey. The survey was conducted at the community level across all administrative divisions of Bangladesh. A total of 5128 ever-married women aged 15–49 years who had a live birth within 5 years prior to the survey were included in the analysis. Women with missing or incomplete information regarding the timing of their first ANC visit were excluded from the study.

The primary outcome was early initiation of ANC, defined as the first ANC contact within the first trimester.

The study applied survival analysis methods, including Kaplan-Meier survival curves, log-rank tests and an Accelerated Failure Time model, to assess the determinants of early ANC initiation.

Only 37.9% (95% CI 36.0% to 39.9%) of women in Bangladesh initiated ANC within the first trimester. Early ANC initiation was associated with higher maternal age, education, skilled employment, wealthier households, media exposure, higher decision-making autonomy, higher husband’s education and urban residence. Women who reported that distance to a health facility was not a big problem had initiated ANC earlier than those who considered distance a major barrier. Regional disparities were also evident, with women from Barishal, Chattogram, Rajshahi, Khulna and Rangpur accessing ANC later than those in Dhaka.

Persistent inequalities in early ANC initiation highlight the need for targeted policies to reduce financial barriers, improve healthcare accessibility and strengthen awareness campaigns to ensure equitable maternal healthcare in Bangladesh.

Respiratory infections like influenza and SARS-CoV-2 pose significant global health risks due to their high transmissibility and severity. SARS-CoV-2 has caused over 7 million deaths worldwide, and the Lancet Commission estimates a >20% chance of a similar respiratory virus pandemic within a decade. Schools, often poorly ventilated, are high-risk settings for transmission. While COVID-19 school closures may have reduced transmission, they likely caused learning loss, mental health issues and increased burdens on parents and caregivers. Air purifiers with High Efficiency Particulate Air (HEPA) filters may offer a non-disruptive mitigation strategy, but the evidence to support their effectiveness in reducing viral transmission is weak. This protocol describes a cluster-randomised, parallel, two-arm, group sequential superiority trial with an interim analysis—to allow early stopping for efficacy or futility—to estimate the effect of portable air purifiers with HEPA filters in primary school classrooms on student absenteeism.

This group sequential trial will randomise schools (clusters) 1:1 to intervention or control arms in two stages: winter 2025/2026 (N=32 schools; ~736 students) and winter 2026/2027 (N=30 schools; ~690 students). The study setting is Norway. Eligible schools must have classrooms suitable for portable air purifiers, >10 students in grades 5–7 (typically aged 10–13 years) and principal consent. Intervention and control classrooms will each receive two portable air purifiers with HEPA filters operating at a performance equivalent to 3.0 and 0.3 air changes per hour, respectively, with control purifiers acting as shams. Outcomes will be measured during and at the end of a 12-week period. The primary outcome is student absenteeism, measured as full child days of absence aggregated at the class level. An interim analysis is planned at the end of the first stage, with error-spending O’Brien-Fleming stopping boundaries that are binding for efficacy and non-binding for futility. The primary estimand is the marginal incidence rate ratio of student absences, estimated using generalised estimating equations with a negative binomial model to account for overdispersion. Prespecified stopping boundaries will determine stopping, with efficacy boundaries being binding. Treatment effects will be estimated using cluster-bootstrapped CIs adjusted to provide strong control on overall type I and II error probabilities, and a bias correction will be applied if the trial is stopped early for efficacy. All analyses will follow the intention-to-treat principle. The primary question is whether installing and operating air purifiers with HEPA filters (intervention) reduces student absenteeism due to sickness (primary outcome) compared with sham air purifiers (control). Secondary questions examine whether the intervention reduces teacher absenteeism due to respiratory infections, rate and 12-week risk of self-reported respiratory infections among teachers, and teachers’ perceptions of air quality, compared with sham air purifiers. If the trial estimates a statistically significant effect for the primary outcome, a cost-consequence analysis will evaluate the direct and indirect costs associated with operating air purifiers against the potential benefits of reduced student and teacher absenteeism. A process evaluation will explore mechanisms of effect.

The trial has been approved by the Regional Committees for Medical and Health Research Ethics and the National Research Ethics Committee (ref. 737650). Absence data, routinely collected and fully anonymised at the class level, will serve as the primary outcome and does not require informed consent. Informed consent will be obtained from teachers participating in weekly surveys or interviews. Results will be disseminated to stakeholders, participants and the public through peer-reviewed journals, scientific meetings and social media.

NCT07119333.

Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are the leading cause of death worldwide, making the development of self-management strategies crucial for preventing complications and improving clinical outcomes. This process involves symptom monitoring, treatment adherence, emotional management and a healthy lifestyle, among others. Reliable instruments are necessary to measure self-management, requiring robust psychometric properties. In this way, this COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN)-based systematic review aims to assess the quality of specific self-management instruments for adults with CVDs.

This systematic review will follow the COSMIN and be reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Protocol. Searches will be conducted in seven databases: MEDLINE, Web of Science, Scopus, PsycINFO, EMBASE and CINAHL. Additionally, a manual search will be performed on PROQOLID, PROMIS and The Medical Outcome Trust websites. Studies on the development and validation of patient-reported instruments measuring specific self-management for individuals with CVDs will be included, without language or date restrictions. The search will be performed in November 2025, with the final version of the review expected to be completed in October 2026. Data extraction will follow COSMIN recommendations. The Modified Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach will be used to determine the quality of evidence. Instruments will be categorised according to COSMIN recommendations. All steps will be conducted by two independent reviewers, with a third reviewer involved in case of discrepancies. Additionally, the content of the instruments will be analysed and linked to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health, following international recommendations.

This study does not require ethics committee approval as it is a review of published data. The review results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journal publications and presentations at scientific conferences.

CRD42024605969.

To examine the effects of 12 weeks group-based peer-led aquatic high-intensity interval training (AHIIT) compared with aquatic moderate continuous training (AMICT) on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs).

A single-blind, parallel-group, randomised trial with a 1:1 allocation ratio.

Community-based setting.

89 participants (mean age 62 (SD 13) years) with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases, including hip and knee osteoarthritis, fibromyalgia, rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis and axial spondyloarthritis, were randomly allocated to an AHIIT (n=44) or an AMICT (n=45) group.

The intervention consisted of AHIIT (four intervals of 4 min at high intensity, Borg scale 14–18) or AMICT (Borg scale 12–13), conducted twice weekly for 12 weeks.

Outcomes included disease activity (measured by the Patient Global Assessment), fatigue, pain and health-related quality of life (HRQoL), measured by the EQ-5D utility index (five-dimensional health status measure) and EQ VAS (self-rated overall health scale) for overall health, physical and social activities. All outcomes were assessed at baseline, 3 months and 6 months. To compare the overall benefit of these interventions, QALYs were estimated based on HRQoL. Linear mixed models for repeated measures were used to estimate the mean difference (95% CI) in outcomes.

No statistically significant differences between the groups were found in any outcomes at either three or 6 months (p>0.05).

No difference between the groups was found on PROMs and QALYs. Future research should include larger sample sizes and a non-exercising control group to better determine the efficacy of AHIIT and clarify the role of exercise intensity in symptom management.

NCT05209802.

Preoperative prehabilitation programmes for patients with colorectal cancer have been shown to reduce complications and hospital length of stay. However, supervised weekly physiotherapy is expensive and timeconsuming for both healthcare professionals and patients, leading to suboptimal implementation of prehabilitation programmes. A previous study demonstrated that offering home-based prehabilitation through an app is feasible and leads to outcomes comparable to supervised prehabilitation programmes. This study was conducted at a single hospital. To expand this promising modality nationwide, it is essential to identify key implementation determinants. We therefore initiated this multicentre study involving a more diverse and heterogeneous patient population. The findings of this study will provide valuable input for scaling strategies for prehabilitation programmes in the Netherlands and beyond.

In this prospective multicentre cohort study, approximately 300 patients with colorectal cancer scheduled for curative surgery will be enrolled over 12 months. The study adopts a hybrid type 3 design, reporting clinical outcomes while exploring implementation-related factors. Five hospitals with varied profiles (academic, non-academic teaching and general hospitals) and geographical locations (urban and rural, high and low socioeconomic areas) are participating. The primary endpoint is the identification of barriers and facilitators, using both qualitative (interviews) and quantitative (user statistics, questionnaires) data from stakeholders. Secondary endpoints include fitness and clinical outcomes such as complications and mortality.

This study was approved by the METC (Medisch Ethische Toetsings Commissie / Dutch Medical Ethics Committee) and was established not to apply to the Medical Research Involving Human Subjects Act (WMO / Wet Medisch Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek met mensen); submission was 21 April 2025. The app is proven safe and feasible in earlier studies and is CE certified (Conformité Européenne). Informed consent will be obtained from all patients (Supplement 1). Adverse events will be monitored and reported. Only researchers will have access to the final dataset. Results will be disseminated through publications, patient group briefings and implementation feedback to healthcare workers. Plans for sharing deidentified individual clinical trial participant-level data consist of quotes from interviews held on stakeholders. This study protocol adheres to the SPIRIT guidelines.

As of 2024, 123.2 million people had been forcibly displaced as a result of persecution, armed conflict or climate-related catastrophes, and these numbers are predicted to rise. There is a growing awareness of possible intergenerational effects of trauma on life-course health and well-being, however few studies have followed individuals longitudinally starting prenatally. This paper describes the first large prenatal birth cohort study in a refugee context in a lower middle-income country. This study aims to investigate the potential lifespan health and developmental implications of being born into a protracted humanitarian context, and what factors can buffer from the adversity posed by conflict and displacement.

We outline our approach of recruiting, consenting and gathering data from pregnant Rohingya refugee and host community women (N=2888; 80% Rohingya) over the course of 12 months in Cox’s Bazar, Bangladesh.

A fifth wave of data collection, when children were 6 months old, was completed in April 2025. Rohingya women were substantially less literate; were marrying and having children at slightly younger ages, were more likely to live in crowded, resource-limited households and exhibited higher rates of clinically significant post-traumatic stress disorder and anxiety than host community women.

There is a critical need for research in displaced populations in order to elucidate potentially lasting transgenerational impacts of experiencing conflict and displacement trauma, and the prenatal and postnatal factors that support health and development across the life span. The next follow-up is planned when the children turn 36 months of age (starting March 2026).

This study compared the effectiveness of first-time use of faster aspart with rapid-acting insulin analogues in patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D) or type 2 diabetes (T2D).

This retrospective cohort study used data from 1 January 2017 to 8 May 2021 captured in the Clinical Practice Research Datalink Aurum database in the UK.

Patients with T1D or T2D either initiating faster aspart or another rapid-acting insulin analogue (‘new users’) or switching from a rapid-acting insulin analogue to faster aspart or to another rapid-acting insulin analogue (‘switchers’) were included. The index date was the date of first prescription of faster aspart or a rapid-acting insulin analogue, or of switching to a different rapid-acting analogue or to faster aspart.

A total of 9695 and 2170 patients were included in the new users (T1D, 1737; T2D, 7958) and switchers cohorts (T1D, 1764; T2D, 406), respectively.

Glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) change at 6 months, occurrence of hypoglycaemia from index to 12 months post-index and treatment persistency from index to discontinuation or censoring.

Numerically greater reductions were observed with faster aspart than rapid-acting insulins in T1D switchers and new users in change in HbA1c at 6 months. Patients with T1D who switched to faster aspart experienced a significant reduction in rate of hypoglycaemia (p=0.0021). Treatment persistency was higher with faster aspart than with rapid-acting insulins among T1D switchers. No distinction in treatment persistency was observed between the treatment groups for T1D new users or T2D switchers.

Reductions in HbA1c were numerically larger with faster aspart in three of four subgroups. There was higher treatment persistency with faster aspart vs rapid-acting insulin analogues among T1D switchers.

NN1218-4967.

Inappropriate medication use among surgical patients poses significant risks, including antibiotic resistance, complications, mortality, increased healthcare costs and challenges in pain management. This study aimed to assess the extent of inappropriate antibiotic and analgesic prescriptions, treatment adequacy and contributing factors.

A hospital-based cross-sectional study was conducted among patients admitted to surgical wards in three comprehensive specialised hospitals in northwest Ethiopia.

All eligible adult patients admitted to the surgical wards during the data collection period were included in the study.

The primary outcomes were the appropriateness of antibiotic and analgesic prescriptions. To assess patients’ pain perception and the effectiveness of pain management strategies, the American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire was used. The Pain Management Index was employed to evaluate the treatment adequacy. The RAND (Research and Development)-modified Delphi method was applied to reach expert consensus on best practices for antibiotic prescribing. Additionally, the national standard treatment guideline was used to benchmark prescribing practices. Binary logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with inappropriate prescriptions of antibiotics and analgesics.

The prevalence of inappropriate antibiotics use was 67.5% and 42.2% of patients received inappropriate analgesic prescriptions. Moreover, 51.6% of patients experienced inadequate pain management. Significant factors associated with inappropriate antibiotic prescription included the presence of comorbidities (adjsuted OR (AOR) 3.34, 95% CI 1.88 to 5.92), lack of laboratory tests (AOR 0.26, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.43, higher number of medications (AOR 2.71, 95% CI 1.62 to 4.52) and contaminated wound class (AOR 3.13, 95% CI 1.58 to 6.20). For inappropriate analgesic prescription, pain due to disease (AOR 8.69, 95% CI 1.73 to 4.62), mixed causes of pain (AOR 7.20, 95% CI 1.43 to 6.31), head and facial pain (AOR 0.14, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.39) and an increased number of medications (AOR 2.75, 95% CI 1.72 to 4.41) were significant factors.

The majority of the patients admitted to surgical wards were found to receive inappropriate antibiotic and analgesic medications. Prescribers should pay attention to patients with comorbid diseases, receiving multiple medications. Additionally, routine laboratory tests are essential for guiding antibiotic therapy and improving patient outcomes in surgical wards.

Early-life exposures, such as nutritional deficiencies, stress, smoking, toxins, medications, diseases, infections and inflammation may affect multiple physiological and metabolic systems in the offspring, including hormonal regulation, bone metabolism and mineralisation, and body composition. Moreover, the effect of these early-life exposures on later health may potentially be mediated through adverse neonatal epigenetic reprogramming of bone-related genes affecting health later in life, especially skeletal development and bone density. Thus, to advance this research further, the overall aim of the project is to investigate if (a) neonatal epigenetic and genetic signature; (b) maternal risk factors during preconception and pregnancy, such as medicine use, diseases, socioeconomic status, major life events, weight, growth and lifestyle; (c) risk factors at birth, such as instrumental delivery, mode of delivery, medicine use, injuries, diseases, weight, size for gestational age, ponderal index, gestational age; and (d) childhood risk factors, such as diseases, medicine use, major life events, weight, growth and lifestyle are associated with hormonal status, lipids, bone turnover markers, bone mineral density, fat mass and lean body mass at age 18–19 years.

Population-based, nationwide, cross-sectional clinical study with potential for longitudinal reassessment. Danish women and men aged 18–19 years old will be selected at random from the Danish National Population Registry and invited if they have available neonatal dried blood spot cards. A total of 2000 individuals will be enrolled. The study combines register data, and neonatal epigenetic and genetic analyses from stored blood with clinical and survey data. Body composition will be measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Adult blood and hair samples will be obtained to assess hormonal status, lipids and bone turnover markers. Height, weight, waist and hip circumference, and blood pressure will be measured. Questionnaires on well-being, sleep patterns, dietary and exercise habits, onset of puberty, use of cannabis, nicotine, alcohol and pain medication will be included. Information on medicine use, diseases, socioeconomic status, major life events, weight, growth and lifestyle will be obtained from the national administrative and health registers at the time of conception and during pregnancy for the parents, as well as from the participants throughout their lifetime. Health registries include the Danish Medical Birth Register, the National Patient Register, the Danish National Prescription Register, the National Child Health Register and Statistics Denmark. Multivariate regression analyses will be performed.

This nationwide study has been approved by the Regional Committees on Health Research Ethics for Southern Denmark (S-20230105). The study participants will be enrolled in the study following their informed written consent. Results will be submitted for publication. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology Statement guidelines will be used for reporting.

NCT06509776.

To identify gait biomechanical characteristics associated with pain and cartilage damage in individuals with patellofemoral joint osteoarthritis (PFJ OA) during a stair descent activity.

Cross-sectional observational study.

University-based motion analysis laboratory and musculoskeletal imaging centre.

83 participants entered the study; 66 participants (41 female, 25 male) completed all components required for this analysis. Participants were recruited via electronic health records following clinical knee MRI. Inclusion criteria included MRI-confirmed patellofemoral cartilage lesions using Whole Organ MRI Score (WORMS) gradings (WORMS >1), pain during stair ambulation, body mass index (BMI) ≤35 and informed consent. Exclusion criteria were tibiofemoral abnormalities (WORMS >1), prior knee trauma, gait-altering conditions, MRI contraindications or pregnancy.

Primary outcomes included knee joint kinematics and during stair descent, assessed during three-dimensional motion capture, patient-reported outcomes from the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) questionnaire and WORMS gradings to assess severity of cartilage abnormalities. Regression analyses were performed to examine correlations of biomechanics, age and BMI with pain and cartilage damage. Analyses were also performed on male and female participants separately.

Significant associations were found between biomechanical characteristics and KOOS scores (pain, symptoms and patellofemoral) as well as cartilage damage. For the whole cohort, greater knee flexion at late stance was linked to worse KOOS scores (β=0.53 to 0.71, p

Altered knee biomechanics during stair descent are linked to worse knee pain, function and cartilage damage in PFJ OA, with sex-specific differences emphasising the need for individualised interventions to address movement abnormalities.

Targeted biologic therapies have transformed outcomes for individuals with psoriasis, a common immune-mediated inflammatory skin disease. The widespread use of these highly effective treatments has led to a growing number of individuals with clear or nearly clear skin remaining on continuous, long-term treatment. Personalised strategies to minimise drug exposure may sustain long-term disease control while reducing treatment burden, associated risks and healthcare costs. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility of a definitive pragmatic effectiveness trial of two personalised dose minimisation strategies compared with continuous treatment (standard care) in adults with well-controlled psoriasis receiving the exemplar biologic risankizumab.

This is a multicentre, assessor-blind, parallel group, open-label randomised controlled feasibility trial in the UK, evaluating two personalised biologic dose minimisation strategies for psoriasis. 90 adults with both physician-assessed and patient-assessed clear or nearly clear skin on risankizumab monotherapy for ≥12 months will be randomised in a 1:1:1 ratio to (1) patient-led ‘as-needed’ treatment, where risankizumab is administered at the first sign of self-assessed psoriasis recurrence, (2) therapeutic drug monitoring-guided treatment, with personalised dosing intervals determined using a pharmacokinetic model or (3) continuous treatment as per standard care, for 12 months. Participants will be invited to submit self-reported outcomes and self-taken photographs every 3 months using a bespoke remote monitoring system (mySkin app) and will attend an in-person assessment at 12 months. They may also request additional patient-initiated follow-up appointments during the trial if needed. The primary outcome is the practicality and acceptability of the two personalised biologic dose minimisation strategies, assessed as a composite measure including recruitment and retention rates, adherence to the assigned strategies and acceptability to both patients and clinicians. The feasibility of collecting healthcare cost and resource utilisation data will also be evaluated to inform a future cost-effectiveness analysis. A nested qualitative study, involving semistructured interviews with patients and clinicians, will explore perspectives on the personalised biologic dose minimisation strategies. These findings will inform the design of a future definitive trial.

This study received ethical approval from the Seasonal Research Ethics Committee (reference 24/LO/0089). Results will be disseminated through scientific conferences, peer-reviewed publications and patient/public engagement events. Lay summaries and infographics will be codeveloped with patient partners to ensure the findings are accessible for the wider public.

ISRCTN17922845.

The study aims to explore the experiences of adolescent girls with the onset of their first menstruation in the context of Pakistan and to highlight the sociocultural aspects that shape those experiences.

The study employs an exploratory phenomenological approach.

This study has been conducted at a public sector higher education institute, University of the Punjab, Pakistan. Female students enrolled in the first semester of the undergraduate degree programme were included in the study using a predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria.

Data was collected from six 18 years old girls who had their menarche in the last 6 years through face-to-face in-depth interviews using a semi-structured interview guide from June 2024 to August 2024. The interviews were audio-recorded given the written consent of the participants. Transcripts were analysed thematically following Braun and Clarke’s framework.

Thematic analysis of six interviews revealed three major themes: (1) Experience of first blood: emotional, social and practical difficulties; (2) The problem of mismanagement of first menstruation and the strategies used; and (3) Restrictions during menstruations. The study found that adolescent girls are provided with little to no prior knowledge regarding menarche and menstruation that causes various complexities and vulnerabilities. The social and cultural expectations and the gendered norms construct the experiences of the adolescent girls regarding their first menstruation, while the idea of womanhood is preserved in the society by restricting, isolating and alienating the adolescent girls and modifying their conduct and behaviour accordingly.

Menarche is often experienced as distressing, secretive and isolating for adolescent girls in Pakistan. Educational interventions in families and schools are needed to provide accurate, timely information and to support girls in navigating this transition with confidence and dignity.

The primary objective of this study is to investigate the perceived need and attitudinal perspectives regarding menstrual leave policies among young women in rural South India. The secondary objective was to determine the socio-demographic, menstrual and workplace-related factors associated with attitudes towards menstrual leave among young women.

An analytical cross-sectional study was performed from May 2023 to August 2023.

In a rural district of Tamil Nadu, South India.

The study encompassed 955 young female students above 18 years of age enrolled in educational institutions in a rural district of Tamil Nadu, India. Participants were pursuing diverse professional programmes including medical, dental, allied health sciences, pharmacy and engineering courses.

The primary outcomes included assessment of basic menstrual characteristics (age of menarche, regularity, product usage and pain experiences), pain evaluation using the WaLIDD scale (which measured working ability, anatomical pain location, pain intensity via Wong Baker scale and pain duration) and attitude assessment through a 10-dimension Likert scale. The attitude assessment explored both supportive factors (pain management, environmental considerations, medical leave allocation, menstruation normalisation and performance impact) and potential concerns (medicalisation, perceptions of fragility, stigma, disclosure issues and abnormal leave usage). Secondary outcome measures encompassed the analysis of factors influencing these attitudes, followed by a multivariable linear regression model to identify significant predictors.

Among 955 female students (mean age 19.56±1.33 years), the majority supported menstrual leave for maintaining hygiene (82.3%) and managing dysmenorrhoea (75.8%). A substantial proportion (64.4%) viewed it as a means of normalising menstruation discourse, while 61.6% believed it could enhance workplace performance. However, concerns existed about medicalising menstruation (47.9%) and reinforcing gender stereotypes (43.4%). Multivariate analysis revealed that medical students (B=0.67, 95% CI: 1.34 to 2.00), those with graduate-educated fathers (B=1.64, 95% CI: 0.31 to 2.97), earlier age at menarche (B=–0.23, 95% CI: –0.45 to –0.01) and participants reporting menstrual interference with daily activities (B=0.96, 95% CI: 0.02 to 0.89) held significantly more positive attitudes.

While young women generally support menstrual leave policies, particularly for hygiene and pain management, there are significant concerns about workplace stigmatisation and gender stereotyping. Educational background, parental education and personal menstrual experiences significantly influence attitudes toward menstrual leave. These findings suggest the need for carefully structured menstrual leave policies that balance biological needs with workplace/student place equality concerns.

Non-communicable diseases (NCDs), such as diabetes, cardiovascular diseases and cancer, are major global public health concerns. Diet quality—particularly the consumption of ultra-processed foods—has been associated with increased risk of NCDs. Traditional cohort studies are often expensive and logistically complex. The NutriNet-Brasil cohort leverages a web-based approach, offering a cost-effective and practical solution for comprehensive data collection and long-term follow-up.

Recruitments began in January 2020 through mass media, social media campaigns and collaborations with health organisations. Eligible participants are adults (aged ≥18 years) living in Brazil with internet access. Participants complete self-administered online questionnaires covering dietary intake, health status and other health determinants. Dietary assessment is based on the Nova classification system, which categorises foods by their level of processing.

Over 88 000 participants have completed the initial questionnaire. The cohort is predominantly women (79.9%) and highly educated (67.9% had completed higher education). The web-based design enabled the development and application of innovative dietary assessment tools, including the Nova24h and the Nova24hScreener, specifically designed to evaluate food processing levels. These tools have shown good performance in capturing dietary patterns and are central to the cohort’s aim. The online platform facilitates efficient recruitment, data collection and participant retention.

NutriNet-Brasil is pioneering the development of web-based cohort methodologies and instruments tailored to food processing research. Future work includes leveraging collaborations with national and international research centres to conduct multidisciplinary analyses and inform public health policies.