This study aims to investigate the lived experiences of civilians in Lahore during the 2025 India–Pakistan conflict, focusing on psychological distress, social disruption, coping mechanisms and perceptions of national response and preparedness.

The study employs an exploratory phenomenological approach.

The study has been conducted in Lahore, the capital city of Punjab, the largest by population province of Pakistan. Lahore was selected as a research site due to its historical, strategic and political significance in Indo-Pak conflicts.

Data were collected from 10 participants aged 18 or above years, who lived in Lahore between April and May 2025, and were willing to discuss personal, social or psychological experiences related to the conflict. In-depth, semistructured interviews were conducted in Urdu, transcribed, and were thematically analysed using both manual and NVivo V.12 software-supported coding.

Seven inter-related themes were identified. Participants reported intense anxiety, hypervigilance and insomnia driven by hybrid warfare tactics, including misinformation, drone sightings and media sensationalism. Social life was disrupted through withdrawal from public, religious and communal activities. Coping strategies included religious faith, family cohesion, humour and expressions of national solidarity. Notably, many participants experienced psychosomatic symptoms such as palpitations, gastrointestinal distress and stress-induced fever. A prominent finding was the absence of civilian preparedness guidance, which amplified fear and uncertainty during the escalation.

The conflicts, although short lived and geographical restrained, casts a long psychological and social on civilians, marked by fear, uncertainty, social disruption and dissatisfaction with institutional preparedness. While some coping and resilience were evident, the findings highlight the need to strengthen civilian-focused public health responses during periods of conflict escalation, including mental health awareness, media literacy and community-level support within Pakistan’s emergency response frameworks.

Childhood and adolescence are critical developmental periods marked by increasing physical inactivity, stress and mental health problems. TABATA training, a supramaximal form of high-intensity interval training, has been increasingly promoted as a time-efficient approach to improving health. However, evidence on its specific effects in children and adolescents remains limited, fragmented and not systematically synthesised. The objective of this review is to determine whether TABATA training improves physical fitness and mental health outcomes in children and adolescents aged 6–18 years.

We will perform a systematic review of experimental studies in the following databases: PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library and Web of Science. The initial literature search was conducted in May 2025, and the systematic review is expected to be completed by March 2026. Eligible studies will include multisession Tabata interventions defined as repeated 20 s high-intensity bouts with 10 s rest intervals, typically performed for 7–8 cycles per set, with or without multiple sets. Outcomes will include physical fitness indicators and mental health indicators. Study selection and data extraction will follow the Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes, Study design framework and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols guidelines. The risk of bias will be assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool for randomised trials and Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies - of Interventions for non-randomised studies. When sufficient data are available, quantitative synthesis will be conducted using a three-level random-effects meta-analytic model to account for dependency among effect sizes and anticipated clinical and methodological heterogeneity across studies. Effect sizes for continuous outcomes will be calculated as standardised mean differences. Sensitivity analyses will be performed, and publication bias will be assessed using funnel plots when an adequate number of studies is available. Statistical analyses will be performed using R and Review Manager (RevMan) V.5.4, where appropriate.

The results of the systematic review will be disseminated via publication in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at a relevant conference. As we will not use individual patient data, ethical approval is not required.

CRD42025632986.