FreshRSS

🔒
❌ Acerca de FreshRSS
Hay nuevos artículos disponibles. Pincha para refrescar la página.
AnteayerTus fuentes RSS

Protocol of a scoping review of outcome domains in dermatology

Por: Nadir · U. · Ahmed · A. · Yi · M. D. · Hisham · F. I. · Dave · L. · Kottner · J. · Ezzedine · K. · Garg · A. · Ingram · J. R. · Jemec · G. B. E. · Spuls · P. I. · Kirkham · J. J. · Cahn · B. · Alam · M.
Introduction

Core outcome sets (COSs) are agreed outcomes (domains (subdomains) and instruments) that should be measured as a minimum in clinical trials or practice in certain diseases or clinical fields. Worldwide, the number of COSs is increasing and there might be conceptual overlaps of domains (subdomains) and instruments within disciplines. The aim of this scoping review is to map and to classify all outcomes identified with COS projects relating to skin diseases.

Methods and analysis

We will conduct a scoping review of outcomes of skin disease-related COS initiatives to identify all concepts and their definitions. We will search PubMed, Embase and Cochrane library. The search dates will be 1 January 2010 (the point at which Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) was established) to 1 January 2024. We will also review the COMET database and C3 website to identify parts of COSs (domains and/or instruments) that are being developed and published. This review will be supplemented by querying relevant stakeholders from COS organisations, dermatology organisations and patient organisations for additional COSs that were developed. The resulting long lists of outcomes will then be mapped into conceptually similar concepts.

Ethics and dissemination

This study was supported by departmental research funds from the Department of Dermatology at Northwestern University. An ethics committee review was waived since this protocol was done by staff researchers with no involvement of patient care. Conflicts of interests, if any, will be addressed by replacing participants with relevant conflicts or reassigning them. The results will be disseminated through publication in peer-reviewed journals, social media posts and promotion by COS organisations.

BioMEL: a translational research biobank of melanocytic lesions and melanoma

Por: Helkkula · T. · Christensen · G. · Ingvar · C. · Isaksson · K. · Harbst · K. · Persson · B. · Ingvar · A. · Hafström · A. · Carneiro · A. · Gaspar · V. · Jönsson · G. · Nielsen · K.
Introduction

Diagnosing invasive cutaneous melanoma (CM) can be challenging due to subjectivity in distinguishing equivocal nevi, melanoma in situ and thin CMs. The underlying molecular mechanisms of progression from nevus to melanoma must be better understood. Identifying biomarkers for treatment response, diagnostics and prognostics is crucial. Using biomedical data from biobanks and population-based healthcare data, translational research can improve patient care by implementing evidence-based findings. The BioMEL biobank is a prospective, multicentre, large-scale biomedical database on equivocal nevi and all stages of primary melanoma to metastases. Its purpose is to serve as a translational resource, enabling researchers to uncover objective molecular, genotypic, phenotypic and structural differences in nevi and all stages of melanoma. The main objective is to leverage BioMEL to significantly improve diagnostics, prognostics and therapy outcomes of patients with melanoma.

Methods and analysis

The BioMEL biobank contains biological samples, epidemiological information and medical data from adult patients who receive routine care for melanoma. BioMEL is focused on primary and metastatic melanoma, but equivocal pigmented lesions such as clinically atypical nevi and melanoma in situ are also included. BioMEL data are gathered by questionnaires, blood sampling, tumour imaging, tissue sampling, medical records and histopathological reports.

Ethics and dissemination

The BioMEL biobank project is approved by the national Swedish Ethical Review Authority (Dnr. 2013/101, 2013/339, 2020/00469, 2021/01432 and 2022/02421-02). The datasets generated are not publicly available due to regulations related to the ethical review authority.

Trial registration number

NCT05446155.

How can community pharmacists be supported to manage skin conditions? A multistage stakeholder research prioritisation exercise

Por: Harvey · J. · Shariff · Z. · Anderson · C. · Boyd · M. J. · Ridd · M. J. · Santer · M. · Thomas · K. S. · Maidment · I. · Leighton · P.
Objective

To establish research priorities which will support the development and delivery of community pharmacy initiatives for the management of skin conditions.

Design

An iterative, multistage stakeholder consultation consisting of online survey, participant workshops and prioritisation meeting.

Setting

All data collection took place online with participants completing a survey (delivered via the JISC Online Survey platform, between July 2021 and January 2022) and participating in online workshops and meetings (hosted on Microsoft Teams between April and July 2022).

Participants

174 community pharmacists and pharmacy staff completed the online survey.

53 participants participated in the exploratory workshops (19 community pharmacists, 4 non-pharmacist members of pharmacy staff and 30 members of the public). 4 healthcare professionals who were unable to attend a workshop participated in a one-to-one interview.

29 participants from the workshops took part in the prioritisation meeting (5 pharmacists/pharmacy staff, 1 other healthcare professional and 23 members of the public).

Results

Five broad areas of potential research need were identified in the online survey: (1) identifying and diagnosing skin conditions; (2) skin conditions in skin of colour; (3) when to refer skin conditions; (4) disease-specific concerns and (5) product-specific concerns.

These were explored and refined in the workshops to establish 10 potential areas for research, which will support pharmacists in managing skin conditions. These were ranked in the prioritisation meeting. Among those prioritised were topics which consider how pharmacists work with other healthcare professionals to identify and manage skin conditions.

Conclusions

Survey responses and stakeholder workshops all recognised the potential for community pharmacists to play an active role in the management of common skin conditions. Future research may support this in the generation of resources for pharmacists, in encouraging public take-up of pharmacy services, and in evaluating the most effective provision for dealing with skin conditions.

Association between the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and psoriasis: a cross-sectional study of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2011-2014

Por: Hong · J. · Lian · N. · Li · M.
Objectives

To investigate the association between the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and psoriasis.

Design

Cross-sectional study.

Setting

National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2011–2014.

Participants

A subsample of 8387 individuals aged 18 years and older were screened for inclusion, of whom 238 reported a diagnosis of psoriasis.

Primary and secondary outcome measures

Psoriasis and the severity of psoriasis were defined according to participants’ self-reports. Weighted logistic regression, subgroup and restricted cubic spline (RCS) analyses were conducted to estimate the potential relationship of the NLR with psoriasis.

Results

In the fully adjusted models, the fourth quartile of the NLR was significantly and positively associated with the presence of psoriasis using the first quartile as a reference (OR: 2.22, 95% CI: 1.27 to 3.87, p=0.01). Elevated NLR was associated with an increased odds of having more severe psoriasis for the highest quartile (vs the lowest quartile), with an OR of 2.43 (95% CI: 1.10 to 5.36, p=0.003). The association between the NLR and psoriasis differed across prespecified subgroups by age, sex, race, income and education. A non-linear correlation of the NLR with psoriasis was observed using univariable and multivariable RCS (all p for non-linearity

Conclusions

The NLR was non-linearly and positively correlated with the presence of psoriasis, and our findings suggest a significant association between the NLR and the severity of psoriasis. The potential role and value in the clinical diagnosis and prognostic assessment of the NLR in psoriasis calls for further longitudinal studies.

Non-pharmacological interventions for patients with psoriasis: a scoping review

Por: Zhang · X.-j. · Lin · J. · Feng · L. · Ou · M. · Gong · F.-q.
Objectives

Healthcare ultimately aims to eradicate diseases and restore normality to people’s lives. However, until this is achieved for every person, there is a need to support and assist patients with psoriasis using non-pharmacological interventions. These ‘adjuvant’ approaches have received little attention, whereas dermatologists and researchers strive for better pharmacological therapy. Here, we aimed to perform a scoping review to identify and catalogue non-pharmacological interventions for patients with psoriasis.

Design

A scoping review.

Setting

All healthcare settings.

Search strategy

EMBASE, PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO and Scopus databases were searched from their inception to June 2022. Irrespective of the study type, the studies included non-pharmacological interventions for patients with psoriasis. This theme was extracted from the included articles. Two reviewers independently screened and analysed the data.

Results

From 1322 initial records, 71 studies were identified and analysed. Non-pharmacological interventions for patients with psoriasis include two levels: organisational and individual. The organisational non-pharmacological interventions included the nationwide healthcare model (PsPSP, ProvenCare, German PsoHealth and Psoriasis Network, IMPROVE model and PsoWell clinic), innovative teledermatology models (mHealth app, electronic Targeted Intervention for Psoriasis study and therapist-guided internet-based cognitive and behavioural treatments) and multidisciplinary interventions. The individual non-pharmacological interventions included educational interventions (therapeutic patient education, psychoeducational intervention and self-management education), psychosocial interventions (cognitive and behavioural treatments, self-help and peer-to-peer support programmes) and others (happify and motivational interviewing-based training).

Conclusions

Based on previous literature, a nationwide healthcare model protocol was constructed for patients with psoriasis. This provided the direction for developing a new psoriasis healthcare model and a basis for summarising the non-pharmacological interventions for patients with psoriasis, which helps them adjust to changes in the skin disease.

❌