Conectar
by Ningjing Guo, Xuyan Li, Xiaoxue Li, Congmin Kang, Xiaoyan Gong, Xinyu Ji, Jie Zheng
BackgroundExploratory applications of large language models within the specialized field of metabolic and bariatric surgery have begun to emerge. Nevertheless, existing research remains fragmented, lacking comprehensive integration.
ObjectiveTo conduct a scoping review of studies on the application of large language models in the field of metabolic and bariatric surgery, aiming to provide a reference for clinical practice and future research.
MethodsThis scoping review adhered to the Joanna Briggs Institute methodological framework and followed the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-Analyses extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines.PubMed, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, Embase, CINAHL, CNKI, Wanfang, and VIP databases were searched for relevant studies, with the search timeframe from database inception to November 2025. The included literature was summarized and analyzed.
ResultsA total of 21 English-language studies were included. LLMs were primarily applied in scenarios such as patient education and information consultation, clinical decision support, and professional knowledge assessment. While LLMs performed well in information-provision tasks, they showed low consistency with expert opinions in complex clinical tasks such as individualized surgical recommendations. Performance varied across different models, with GPT-4 generally demonstrating superior performance, and domain-specific models showing professional potential. Current research still faces challenges regarding information accuracy, readability, and clinical applicability.
ConclusionLarge language models hold auxiliary potential in the field of metabolic and bariatric surgery, particularly for knowledge dissemination and patient education. However, their reliability in complex clinical decision-making remains limited. Future efforts should focus on conducting high-quality studies, advancing model specialization and standardized evaluation, and exploring safe and effective human-AI collaboration models.
To synthesise evidence on the association between any diagnosed or self-reported mental health problems prior to pregnancy (pre-existing mental health problems) and birth outcomes including preterm birth (PTB), low birth weight (LBW), small for gestational age (SGA), neonatal unit (NNU) admission and mode of birth (instrumental birth, planned or unplanned caesarean section).
Systematic searches were conducted in MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase and PsycINFO in December 2024 for studies examining the association between any pre-existing mental health problems and PTB, LBW, SGA, NNU admission and mode of birth. Only articles published in English were included with no restriction on year of publication. Two reviewers independently screened studies and extracted data. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and Joanna Briggs Institute checklists. Random-effects meta-analyses were conducted to pool crude and adjusted ORs (aORs) and risk ratios (aRR) with 95% CIs. ORs and RRs were analysed separately. Between-study heterogeneity was quantified using the I2 statistic.
Of 15 467 records screened, 33 studies met the inclusion criteria. Women with any pre-existing mental health problems had higher odds and risks of adverse birth outcomes, including PTB (aOR 1.41, 95% CI 1.27 to 1.56) (aRR 1.36, 95% CI 1.21 to 1.51), LBW (aOR 1.28, 95% CI 1.22 to 1.33) (aRR 1.32, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.68), SGA (aOR 1.27, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.51) (aRR 1.34, 95% CI 1.19 to 1.51) and NNU admission (aOR 1.44, 95% CI 1.19 to 1.74). Adjusted estimates were based on multivariable models that commonly controlled for maternal age, parity and socio-demographic factors. No consistent associations were observed between pre-existing mental health problems and mode of birth.
Pre-existing mental health problems were associated with increased risks and odds of several adverse birth outcomes. These findings highlight the importance of early identification and targeted support for women with mental health problems before pregnancy to strengthen preconception and maternity care planning.
CRD42023485834.
by Weifeng Wang, Xianli Meng, Yan Zhao, Wei Gong, Xiaochen Jiang, Wenjuan Cao, Xueling Qiu, Chenxi Sun, Fan Sun, Yuchen Wang, Lu Tang
BackgroundTo alleviate pain in burn patients during dressing changes, it is necessary to identify an effective analgesic method. Conventional opioid analgesics have many limitations. Nitrous oxide is a fast-acting, safe and reversible inhaled analgesic gas. This systematic review will evaluate the effectiveness and safety of nitrous oxide in the treatment of pain during dressing changes in burn patients.
MethodThe protocol was developed according to the PRISMA-P checklist and registered on PROSPERO (CRD42024550197). A systematic search will be performed in the following databases: PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library to identify clinical trials comparing nitrous oxide inhalation with standard care in pain management during dressing changes in burn wounds. The search of all databases will be conducted on October 15, 2025.Our search scope will include studies published between each database creation and search date.Two researchers will independently screen studies, extract data, and evaluate study quality using the Risk of Bias2 tool. Primary outcomes will include pain, anxiety, side effects, among others.R statistical software (version 4.3.1) and R studio will be used to perform meta-analyses.Effect size will be expressed by 95% confidence interval (Cl) of weighted mean difference (MD) and risk ratio (RR). Subgroup analyses and sensitivity analyses will be performed to explore sources of heterogeneity and assess the robustness of the results.Publication bias will be assessed using funnel plot and Egger test. We will use the Grading of Recommendation, Evaluation, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) to assess the quality of the evidence.
DiscussionOperative pain has always been a difficult problem for burn patients. This study will evaluate the analgesic effect of nitrous oxide on dressing change in burn patients through comprehensive search and rigorous methods, and provide evidence support for clinical decision-making.
China has the highest global burden of new cancer diagnoses and cancer-related mortality, with approximately 60%–85% of patients with advanced malignancies experiencing moderate-to-severe pain. Although the WHO’s analgesic ladder is widely implemented, approximately 20% of cancer-related pain remains refractory. This persistent pain is often further complicated by opioid-induced side effects and the risk of opioid use disorders. Methadone, a potent opioid with distinct pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties, has shown potential in managing refractory cancer pain; however, there is a lack of standardised and evidence-based protocols for methadone conversion, particularly in patients requiring high-dose opioids.
This multicentre, open-label randomised controlled trial will enrol 164 Chinese patients with cancer and oral morphine equivalent daily dose requirements of ≥300 mg. Participants will be randomised to receive either the 3 day switch (3DS) strategy or the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN)-recommended methadone conversion method. The primary endpoints include time to stable analgesia, methadone conversion efficiency and overall pain relief rate. Secondary endpoints will evaluate pain intensity, frequency of breakthrough pain, corrected QT interval changes, incidence of adverse events and health-related quality of life. This trial is designed to generate high-quality clinical evidence to inform methadone conversion strategies for patients with refractory cancer pain who are dependent on high-dose opioids. By addressing existing gaps in clinical practice and pharmacoeconomic decision-making, the study aims to support the development of standardised methadone protocols.
This study was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of Zhejiang Cancer Hospital (approval number: IRB-2024-314(IIT)) on 3 April 2024 and registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2400085332) on 5 June 2024. The outcomes will be disseminated through national and international presentations and peer-reviewed publications.
ChiCTR2400085332.
To explore the illness coping experiences of patients with moderate-to-severe burns and provide a reference for healthcare professionals to formulate coping strategies.
Qualitative study using a descriptive phenomenological approach.
From 1 June to 30 September 2024, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 19 patients with moderate-to-severe burns. Colaizzi's seven-step method was used for data analysis.
Seven subthemes and three higher order themes were identified: (1) perception of illness experience; (2) coping with disease threats; and (3) benefits of coping with illness. Most of the participants faced multiple difficulties in their disease experiences, such as increased financial pressure, higher pressure on family caregiving, deformed physical conditions and negative emotions. Positive psychological qualities, family and social support played significant roles in coping with these challenges.
Patients with moderate-to-severe burns experience multiple difficulties during their recovery. Effective coping resources can help them overcome these challenges.
Healthcare professionals should work with patients with moderate-to-severe burns and their families to establish an effective support system that enhances patients' coping abilities and promotes their overall recovery.
Patients with moderate-to-severe burns face diverse challenges. However, their experiences and coping processes during recovery remain unclear. This study provided valuable insights into their illness experiences and coping strategies. The findings highlighted multiple difficulties, such as a significant increase in financial pressure and dependence on family caregiving, painful and deforming physical conditions and various negative emotions. Positive psychological qualities, family and social support play an important role in coping with these challenges. Healthcare professionals should work with patients and their families to establish effective support systems to promote overall recovery.
No patient or public involvement.
To explore the views and preferences for advance care planning from the perspectives of residents, family members and healthcare professionals in long-term care facilities.
A qualitative descriptive design.
We conducted semi-structured interviews with 12 residents of long-term care facilities, 10 family members and 14 healthcare professionals. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. The social ecological model was used to develop implementation recommendations.
We constructed a conceptual model of barriers and facilitators to advance care planning in long-term care facilities, drawing upon four dominant themes from the qualitative analysis: (1) The absence of discourse on end-of-life care: a lack of cultural climate to talk about death, the unspoken agreement to avoid conversations about death, and poor awareness of palliative care may hinder advance care planning initiation; (2) Relational decision-making process is a dual factor affecting advance care planning engagement; (3) Low trust and ‘unsafe’ cultures: a lack of honest information sharing, risks of violating social expectations and damaging social relationships, and risks of legal consequences may hinder willingness to engage in advance care planning; (4) Meeting and respecting residents' psychosocial needs: these can be addressed by readiness assessment, initiating advance care planning in an informal and equal manner and involving social workers.
Our findings show that residents' voices were not being heard. It is necessary to identify residents' spontaneous conversation triggers, articulate the value of advance care planning in light of the family's values and preferences, and respect residents' psychosocial needs to promote advance care planning in long-term care facilities. Advance care planning may alleviate the decision-making burden of offspring in nuclear families.
The evidence-based recommendations in this study will inform the implementation of context-specific advance care planning in Asia-Pacific regions.
Patients and caregivers contributed to the interview pilot and data collection.
Lateral violence is a global social problem that has attracted considerable attention in the field of public health. This has seriously affected the quality of care, the safety of patients' lives and the career development of nurses.
To systematically evaluate the factors influencing of nursing lateral violence and provide evidence for preventing and reducing inter-nursing lateral violence.
A systematic review of qualitative study was performed in accordance with the Enhancing Transparency in Reporting the Synthesis of Qualitative Research (ENTREQ) guidelines. We collected qualitative studies on the factors influencing of inter-nursing lateral violence by searching PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CINAHL, Science Direct, WanFang Data, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Chinese Scientific Journal Database (VIP) and Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM). Data from inception to September 2023. Literature screening and data extraction were independently conducted by two reviewers. The Critical Appraisal Skills Program (CASP) scale was employed to assess the quality of the studies, including objectives, methodologies, designs, results and contributions.
A total of 25 studies involving 882 participants were included. The results of the thematic analysis indicated that inter-nursing lateral violence was influenced by hospital management, perpetrators, victims and sociodemographic factors.
Inter-nursing lateral violence was influenced by multidimensional factors. To reduce the occurrence of horizontal violence among nurses, hospitals need to explore the establishment and improvement of a horizontal violence resolution mechanism, and schools should pay attention to the joint support and education of nursing students, create a good working environment and harmonious nursing culture, and promote mutual respect among nurses.
This review emphasises the importance of the influencing factors of horizontal violence among nurses, analyses the importance of influencing factors from different perspectives, and proposes corresponding measures to reduce inter-nursing lateral violence.
This study was mostly a literature review; neither patients nor pertinent staff were involved in either the design or conduct of the investigation.
This study aimed to systematically synthesise and analyse nurses’ experiences in implementing clinical nursing research (CNR) to inform administrators and researchers involved in CNR.
Qualitative meta-synthesis.
The following six databases were searched: PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CINAHL (EBSCO), PsycINFO (EBSCO) and Embase. The search period included material published up to December 2024.
We included qualitative studies exploring perspectives, experiences and other similar factors. JBI Critical Appraisal Tool (2024 edition) was used to evaluate the quality of included studies.
Two reviewers independently conducted the literature search, study selection and data coding. Using principles of similarity and integration, findings from the included studies were grouped into general categories. A final synthesis was produced through analysis of the relationship between categories.
11 studies were included, from which four themes were identified: feelings and motivations prior to participation in CNR; understanding the role of the clinical nursing researcher; factors hindering CNR implementation; and expectations for CNR development. These themes comprised 12 sub-themes.
This review highlights nurses’ experience in implementing CNR. Strengthening motivation and clarifying the roles and responsibilities associated with CNR may facilitate the translation of research findings into clinical practice. In parallel, healthcare administrators should foster a supportive CNR culture and provide resources to address barriers to implementation.
CRD42025631159.
Acute pain following pulmonary surgery can affect the recovery process of patients. The use of intrathecal morphine (ITM) injections offers a long-lasting analgesic effect, but its clinical application remains controversial. This study aims to investigate the impact of combining bupivacaine with ITM injections on the quality of postoperative recovery in patients who have undergone pulmonary surgery.
This multicentre, randomised, double-blind, controlled trial will enrol 254 patients undergoing elective lung surgery, who will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either group IT (receiving an intrathecal injection of 3 mg bupivacaine and 0.25 mg morphine before general anaesthesia induction) or the control group (C group). The primary outcome includes postoperative recovery quality on day 1 (quality of recovery, QoR-15), with secondary outcomes encompassing postoperative recovery quality on days 2 and 3 (QoR-15), pain scores within 72 hours postoperatively, analgesic rescue, intraoperative haemodynamic parameters, opioid consumption, postoperative adverse reactions, recovery metrics, complications, chronic pain incidence and sleep quality.
The results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications. This study protocol (V.2.0, 30 October 2024) involves human participants and has been approved by the Ethics Committee of Affiliated Hospital of Yangzhou University (number 2024-08-02-2), Taicang Hospital Affiliated to Soochow University (number 2025 SR-041) and Yichang Central People’s Hospital (number 2024-513-02). Each individual who agrees to participate in the research will provide written informed consent after the objectives and procedures of this study are explained to them.
ChiCTR2400092935. Registered on 26 November 2024.
This study aims to explore the views and experiences of people with dementia, informal caregivers and professionals regarding eating and drinking difficulties.
A qualitative systematic review was conducted.
The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis guidelines were used to conduct this systematic review. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for Qualitative Research, and the data were thematically synthesised using Thomas and Harden's three-stage method.
Six electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CINAHL and PsycINFO) were searched from their respective inception dates to August 2025 to identify relevant studies.
Thematic analysis of the 16 included studies identified four key themes: (1) Physiological and psychological changes in people with dementia and caregivers; (2) factors influencing eating and drinking in people with dementia; (3) needs and recommendations for people with dementia, informal caregivers and professionals; (4) selection of eating methods for end-stage people with dementia.
Eating and drinking difficulties affect the well-being of both patients and caregivers. A good dining environment improves mealtime pleasure but demands caregivers' time and energy. All parties emphasised the importance of effective communication. In end-stage dementia, professional assistance is crucial for enteral nutrition decisions.
Collaboration among patients, caregivers and professionals is vital for creating tailored nutritional plans and improving mealtime environments, thereby enhancing nutritional intake. In advanced dementia, providers must provide balanced information on comfort feeding versus enteral nutrition to aid decision-making.
What problems were addressed in this study? This study addressed the lack of a consolidated, tri-perspective understanding of eating and drinking difficulties in dementia care settings. What are the main findings? Four key themes were identified: physiological and psychological changes, influencing factors, stakeholder needs and end-of-life decision-making. Where and on whom will the research have an impact? This will impact care practices for people with dementia and inform the training and support of informal caregivers and healthcare professionals.
by Jessica Liu, Sameer Pandya, Andreas Coppi, H. Patrick Young, Harlan M. Krumholz, Wade L. Schulz, Guannan Gong
BackgroundNear real-time electronic health record (EHR) data offers significant potential for secondary use in research, operations, and clinical care, yet challenges remain in ensuring data quality and stability. While prior studies have assessed retrospective EHR datasets, few have systematically examined the integrity of real-time data for research readiness.
MethodsWe developed an automated benchmarking pipeline to evaluate the stability and completeness of real-time EHR data from the Yale New Haven Health clinical data warehouse, transformed into the OMOP common data model. Twenty-nine weekly snapshots of the EHR collected from July to November 2024 and twenty-two daily snapshots collected from April to May 2025 were analyzed. Benchmarks focused on (1) clinical actions such as patient additions, deletions, and merges; (2) changes in demographic variables (date of birth, gender, race, ethnicity); and (3) stability of discharge information (time and status). A synthetic dataset derived from MIMIC-III was used to validate the benchmarking code prior to large-scale analyses.
ResultsBenchmarking revealed frequent updates due to clinical actions and demographic corrections across consecutive snapshots. Demographic changes were most frequently related to race and ethnicity, highlighting potential workflow and data entry inconsistencies. Discharge time and status values demonstrated instability for several days post-encounter, typically reaching a stable state within 4–7 days. These findings indicate that while near real-time EHR data provide valuable insights, the timing of data stabilization is critical for accurate secondary use.
ConclusionsThis study demonstrates the feasibility of automated benchmarking to assess the integrity of real-time EHR data and identify when such data become analysis ready. Our findings highlight key challenges for secondary use of dynamic clinical data and provide an automated framework that can be applied across health systems to support high-quality research, surveillance, and clinical trial readiness.
This study aimed to investigate the interrelationship between organisational climate, workplace loneliness and emotional eating among nurses.
A cross-sectional study Data collection involved several validated instruments: a general information questionnaire to capture demographic and professional details, an organisational climate scale to assess the work environment, a workplace loneliness scale to measure feelings of isolation and an emotional eating scale to evaluate the extent of eating behaviours driven by emotional distress.
The research was conducted in March 2024, involving 385 clinical nurses from a large comprehensive hospital in Nanjing, China. The study employed instruments including general information questionnaires, organisational climate scales, workplace loneliness scales and emotional eating scales. The collected data were analysed utilising SPSS 22.0, AMOS 24.0 software and Bootstrap text for mediating effects.
The analysis revealed a significant negative correlation between organisational climate and workplace loneliness, as well as between organisational climate and emotional eating. Additionally, a strong positive correlation was found between workplace loneliness and emotional eating. Conversely, the direct effect of organisational climate on emotional eating was not significant. These findings suggest that workplace loneliness fully mediates the relationship between organisational climate and emotional eating.
Workplace loneliness mediates the relationship between organisational climate and emotional eating among nurses. To address this issue, it is recommended that nursing managers implement effective strategies to enhance the organisational climate and reduce workplace loneliness.
The research aims to alleviate emotional eating and promote the physical and mental well-being of nurses.
No patient or public contribution.
by Lei Guo, Jun Ge, Li Cheng, Xinyi Zhang, Zhengzheng Wu, Meili Liu, Hanmei Jiang, Wei Gong, Yi Liu
BackgroundThe incidence of ulcerative colitis (UC) remains high, with an increasing prevalence among elderly patients. Cellular senescence has been widely recognized as a contributor to UC susceptibility; however, the underlying molecular mechanisms remain incompletely understood. This study aimed to identify senescence-associated biomarkers in UC to provide new insight for diagnosis and treatment.
MethodsBy integrating transcriptomic data from UC patients with established aging-related databases, we identified aging-associated differentially expressed genes (DEGs). Using weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) and Cytoscape, we pinpointed the core genes involved. A diagnostic model for UC was then developed based on these core genes, and their expression patterns were characterized at single-cell resolution. The roles of these genes were ultimately validated through in vitro and animal experiments.
ResultsWe identified 24 aging-related DEGs in UC, which were primarily implicated in inflammatory responses and cytokine-receptor interactions. Further analyses pinpointed three core genes (CXCL1, MMP9, and STAT1) that were predominantly expressed in macrophages. A diagnostic model constructed using these genes exhibited robust predictive performance. Experimental validation confirmed that the expression levels of all three core genes were significantly upregulated in both a UC mouse model and in macrophages compared to controls. Additionally, pathway analyses revealed elevated levels of CXCL12 and VEGFA in the enriched pathways.
DiscussionOur findings underscore the pivotal roles of CXCL1, MMP9, and STAT1 in UC-associated cellular senescence. The analysis positions these molecules as promising macrophage-mediated diagnostic biomarkers and therapeutic targets. Collectively, this work provides novel insights into UC pathogenesis and lays a foundation for developing precision medicine strategies that target senescence pathways.
by Yizhuo Gong, Xinmeng Wang, Mingkun Yu, Peipei Zu
PurposeTo precisely evaluate the independent influence of two different optical zone (OZ) sizes (6.3 mm vs. 6.5 mm) on corneal biomechanical properties within 6 months after Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) using multivariable-adjusted statistical models.
MethodsThis retrospective study included myopic patients who underwent SMILE between 2022 and 2024. Patients were grouped into two groups based on the planned OZ: Group A (6.3 mm, 44 eyes) and Group B (6.5 mm, 54 eyes). Corneal biomechanical parameters were measured using the Corvis ST preoperatively and at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively. Linear Mixed Models (LMM) were used to assess the independent effect of OZ size, adjusting for key baseline covariates and accounting for inter-eye correlation by including a random intercept for patient identifier (ID).
ResultsA total of 98 eyes were analyzed. Baseline analysis revealed a significant imbalance between the groups, with Group A (6.3 mm OZ) having higher myopia and a greater corneal stromal ablation depth (both P 0.05), with the sole exception of Ambrosio Relational Thickness Horizontal (ARTH) (P = 0.012). In contrast, several preoperative covariates, particularly corneal stromal ablation depth and preoperative central corneal thickness, were identified as significant predictors of multiple postoperative biomechanical parameters.
ConclusionThe independent effect of a 0.2 mm difference in optical zone size on corneal biomechanical properties after SMILE appears to be limited. After comprehensive statistical adjustment, the results suggest that preoperative anatomical and surgical parameters, especially corneal stromal ablation depth, are the primary drivers of the postoperative biomechanical response, rather than the minor difference in OZ size itself. This study underscores the importance of confounder adjustment in refractive surgery research and suggests that maximizing the residual stromal bed may be more critical for maintaining corneal biomechanical integrity than fine-tuning the optical zone diameter.
To assess the level of knowledge, attitudes and practices (KAP) among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) regarding cardiovascular risk factors (CVRF) and diabetes-related complications in two hospitals in the West Region of Cameroon during the COVID-19 pandemic.
This was a prospective cross-sectional study conducted over 5 months from April to September 2022.
This study was conducted in two tertiary hospitals in the West Region of Cameroon, in Central Africa.
It included all patients with T2DM receiving care at these two hospitals, having agreed to participate and followed up in both hospitals for at least 3 months.
Sociodemographic, clinical and treatment data were collected using a data sheet, and KAP scores were based on the Essi and Njoya framework. Data collection and analysis were performed using SPSS V.23.0 software. Logistic regression was used to identify the factors associated with unacceptable KAP (p
A total of 140 participants (71 women) with an average age of 63 years and an average diabetes duration of 6.14±5.7 years were included. Most (55%) were managed by general practitioners. The main CVRFs identified were hypertension (11%) and overweight (6%), while the leading complications included visual disorders (10.7%), hypoglycaemia (6.4%) and erectile dysfunction (2.1%). Knowledge was good in 34.3% of participants, only 25.7% demonstrated correct attitudes, and merely 15.7% engaged in adequate practices. Unacceptable knowledge was associated with diabetes duration between 3 months and 5 years (OR: 0.34 (95% CI 0.14 to 0.85), p=0.021), follow-up by a specialist (OR: 0.31 (95% CI 0.13 to 0.74), p=0.009), the presence of at least one CVRF (OR: 0.03 (95% CI 0.00 to 0.23), p
Few people with T2DM presented good knowledge, right attitudes and adequate practices. Enhanced patient education and increasing specialist numbers are essential to promote self-management of the condition and to decrease the incidence of complications and mortality.
FreshRSS 