There are substantial barriers to initiate advance care planning (ACP) for persons with chronic-progressive disease in primary care settings. Some challenges may be disease-specific, such as communicating in case of cognitive impairment. This study assessed and compared the initiation of ACP in primary care with persons with dementia, Parkinson’s disease, cancer, organ failure and stroke.

Longitudinal study linking data from a database of Dutch general practices’ electronic health records with national administrative databases managed by Statistics Netherlands.

Data from general practice records of 199 034 community-dwelling persons with chronic-progressive disease diagnosed between 2008 and 2016.

Incidence rate ratio (IRR) of recorded ACP planning conversations per 1000 person-years in persons with a diagnosis of dementia, Parkinson’s disease, organ failure, cancer or stroke, compared with persons without the particular diagnosis. Poisson regression and competing risk analysis were performed, adjusted for age, gender, migration background, living situation, frailty index and income, also for disease subsamples.

In adjusted analyses, the rate of first ACP conversation for persons with organ failure was the lowest (IRR 0.70 (95% CI 0.68 to 0.73)). Persons with cancer had the highest rate (IRR 1.75 (95% CI 1.68 to 1.83)). Within the subsample of persons with organ failure, the subsample of persons with dementia and the subsample of stroke, a comorbid diagnosis of cancer increased the probability of ACP. Further, for those with organ failure or cancer, comorbid dementia decreased the probability of ACP.

Considering the complexity of initiating ACP for persons with organ failure or dementia, general practitioners should prioritise offering it to them and their family caregivers. Policy initiatives should stimulate the implementation of ACP for people with chronic-progressive disease.

Rare diseases (RD) are collectively common and often genetic. Families value and can benefit from precise molecular diagnoses. Prolonged diagnostic odysseys exacerbate the burden of RD on patients, families and the healthcare system. Genome sequencing (GS) is a near-comprehensive test for genetic RD, but existing care models—where consultation with a medical geneticist is a prerequisite for testing—predate GS and may limit access or delay diagnosis. Evidence is needed to guide the optimal positioning of GS in care pathways. While initiating GS prior to geneticist consultation has been trialled in acute care settings, there are no data to inform the utility of this approach in outpatient care, where most patients with RD seek genetics services. We aim to evaluate the diagnostic yield, time to diagnosis, clinical and personal utility and incremental cost-effectiveness of GS initiated at the time of referral triage (pre-geneticist evaluation) compared with standard of care.

200 paediatric patients referred to one of two large genetics centres in Ontario, Canada, for suspected genetic RD will be randomised into a 1:1 ratio to the intervention (GS first) or standard of care (geneticist first) arm. An unblinded, permuted block randomisation design will be used, stratified within each recruitment site by phenotype and prior genetic testing. The primary outcome measure is time to genetic diagnosis or to cessation of active follow-up. Survival analysis will be used to analyse time-to-event data. Additional measures will include patient-reported and family-reported measures of satisfaction, understanding and perceived test utility, clinician-reported measures of perceived test utility and management impact, and healthcare system utilisation and costs.

This study was approved by Clinical Trials Ontario. Results will be disseminated, at minimum, via peer-reviewed journals, professional conferences and internal reports to funding bodies. Efforts will be made to share aggregated study results with participants and their families.

NCT06935019.

Food intolerances are prevalent in Europe and can cause considerable physical discomfort, dietary restrictions and psychosocial challenges. Among the prominent causes of food intolerance are defects in the digestion and/or transport of short-chain fermentable carbohydrates, fermentable oligo-, di-, monosaccharides and polyols (FODMAPs). A common diagnostic tool for food intolerance is the hydrogen breath test, which monitors the production of H₂ gas from the fermentation of ingested FODMAPs by colonic microbiota. However, this method is limited due to its relatively poor correlation with gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms experienced by patients. Diagnosis is complicated as food intolerance is often associated with functional GI disorders, while FODMAPs may exert their effects individually or in combination. Further research on the pathophysiology and the impact of intervention strategies for these conditions is required to improve the diagnosis of food intolerance.

The Lactobreath pilot study is a randomised, two-arm, double-blinded controlled study. 120 healthy, free-living adults will undergo 6-hour postprandial tests with lactose or glucose (control) to investigate the molecular composition of human exhaled breath (exhalome) as a potential source of biomarkers associated with clinical and metabolic traits of lactose malabsorption (Lactobreath profiles). This serves as a proof-of-concept for the future application of this technology in diagnosing food intolerance. We will use a sensitive, non-invasive, real-time measurement technique based on secondary electrospray ionisation coupled with high-resolution mass spectrometry to analyse the chemical profile of the postprandial exhalome after lactose ingestion. Symptoms of lactose intolerance will be assessed using a standardised questionnaire and mechanistically linked to specific key metabolites of the discriminating breath profile. In parallel, a solid-state sensor will measure postprandial hydrogen gas in breath samples, while GI gases (CH₄, H₂, O₂) and intestinal transit time will be monitored using a novel ingestible gas sensor (Atmo Gas capsule). Metabolites in urine, including lactose-derived metabolites, will be investigated using gas chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry. Postprandial bowel sounds will be recorded by wearable sensors (DigeHealth AG). Baseline assessments will be completed before the dietary challenge to capture usual dietary intake (repeated 24-hour recall), faecal microbiota (shallow shotgun sequencing) and to evaluate genetic polymorphisms using saliva samples (PCR analysis of selected penetrant single-nucleotide polymorphisms).

The Lactobreath study has been approved by the Ethics Committee of the Canton of Zurich, Switzerland (#2023-01639). The project results will be published in open-access journals, presented at national and international conferences and communicated to the public and other relevant stakeholders via the communication channels of all investigators and partners. All results derived from the study will be accessible, in line with the Swiss National Science Foundation open access policy.

NCT06177938.

Gestational diabetes is a common metabolic disorder in pregnancy which identifies a substantial increased risk of future diabetes. Despite this risk, many individuals are not screened for dysglycaemia in the postpartum period. Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) is an evolving technology that provides details of an individual’s glucose levels throughout the day; however, it has not yet been evaluated as a screening tool for postpartum dysglycaemia. To address this gap, this prospective cohort study will examine the use of CGM in the early postpartum period to predict the risk of maternal dysglycaemia after delivery.

The Predicting Dysglycaemia in Individuals with Gestational Diabetes Immediately Postpartum using CGM (PREDISPOSE) study is a prospective cohort study designed to assess the ability of a CGM device (Freestyle Libre 2) worn in the postpartum period to detect persistent dysglycaemia in individuals with gestational diabetes. The study will recruit 240 individuals with gestational diabetes. Each participant will wear the CGM immediately postpartum and before attending routine postpartum diabetes screening, consisting of a 75-gram oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and related blood work (haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), complete blood count and lipid profile). The primary outcome is the accuracy of the area under the curve for all glucose measurements from the first CGM wear to detect postpartum dysglycaemia. We will perform sensitivity and specificity analyses to determine optimal CGM cut-offs to diagnose diabetes or prediabetes. Secondary outcomes include the incidence of postpartum dysglycaemia (based on 75-gram OGTT and/or HbA1c), incidence of postpartum dyslipidaemia, patient acceptability of CGM testing, data variability from CGM and cardiometabolic health outcomes diagnosed in years one, two and five after delivery.

All participating sites have received ethics approval of the current protocol and have started recruitment of participants to the study. The ethics boards that approved this study are the Biomedical Research Ethics Board at the University of Manitoba, the Conjoint Health Research Ethics Board at the University of Calgary, the Mount Sinai Hospital Research Ethics Board at Mount Sinai Hospital and the Comité d'éthique de la Recherche at Université Laval. Study results will be disseminated through conference presentations and publication in a peer-reviewed journal, regardless of study findings.

NCT04972955. Registration date: 28 June 2021.

Chronic inflammatory skin diseases, despite low mortality, significantly impair quality of life (QoL). Up to 80% of patients with dermatological conditions experience severe itch and poor sleep, as well as related mental health challenges such as anxiety and depression. The relationship between skin diseases and mental health highlights the challenges that doctors face in treating these conditions. Existing psychotherapeutics, such as mindfulness training, cognitive behavioural therapy and acceptance and commitment therapy, are widely used and effective in the treatment of mental health illnesses. However, there is limited evidence on the application of such interventions in dermatology, and most mental health apps lack robust clinical evaluation. We report the design of a randomised controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy and implementation of a mobile app containing dermatology-specified psychotherapeutic strategies in reducing QoL burden.

English-speaking patients aged 16 years and older with psoriasis, eczema or chronic urticaria will be recruited and randomised into the intervention arm (psychotherapeutic application) or active control group (Healthy365 app, a general wellness application managed by the Singapore Health Promotion Board). This allows a comparative assessment of app-usage-specific outcomes while preserving the blinding of all participants. The primary outcome is the change in the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) score from baseline to week 8. Secondary outcomes include physician-assessed disease severity at weeks 8 and 16 relative to baseline, differences in other patient-reported measures at weeks 8, 16 and 32, self-reported treatment adherence and initiation/escalation of systemic medications. To understand how patients engage with the app, we will evaluate the implementation process, focusing on key measures such as engagement, satisfaction and willingness to pay. Statistical analysis will be carried out on an intention-to-treat basis, and missing data will be analysed using last observation carried forward.

All participants will receive both verbal and written study information that aligns with Good Clinical Practice guidelines. Ethical approval has been obtained from the National Healthcare Group’s Domain Specific Review Board (reference number: 2022/00751). Results will be disseminated via publication in a relevant journal. Data will be available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

NCT06702293.

SARS-CoV-2 infection provides protection against reinfection and severe COVID-19 disease; however, this protective effect may diminish over time. We assessed waning of natural immunity conferred by previous infection against severe disease and symptomatic reinfection in Brazil and Scotland.

We undertook a test-negative design study and nested case–control analysis to estimate waning of natural immunity against severe COVID-19 outcomes and symptomatic reinfection using national linked datasets. We used logistic regression to estimate ORs with 95% CIs. A stratified analysis assessed immunity during the Omicron dominant period in Brazil.

We included data from the adult populations of Brazil and Scotland from 1 June 2020 to 30 April 2022.

Severe COVID-19 was defined as hospitalisation or death. Reinfection was defined as reverse-transcriptase PCR or rapid antigen test confirmed at least 120 days after primary infection.

From Brazil, we included 30 881 873 tests and 1 301 665 severe COVID-19 outcomes, and from Scotland, we included 1 520 201 tests and 7988 severe COVID-19 outcomes. Against severe outcomes, sustained protection was observed for at least 12 months after primary SARS-CoV-2 infection with little evidence of waning: 12 months postprimary infection: Brazil OR 0.12 (95% CI 0.10 to 0.14), Scotland OR 0.03 (95% CI 0.02 to 0.04). For symptomatic reinfection, Brazilian data demonstrated evidence of waning in the 12 months following primary infection, although some residual protection remained beyond 12 months: 12 months postprimary infection: OR 0.42 (95% CI 0.40 to 0.43). The greatest reduction in risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection was in individuals with hybrid immunity (history of previous infection and vaccination), with sustained protection against severe outcomes at 12 months postprimary infection. During the Omicron dominant period in Brazil, odds of symptomatic reinfection were higher and increased more quickly over time when compared with the overall study period, although protection against severe outcomes was sustained at 12 months postprimary infection (whole study: OR 0.12 (95% CI 0.10 to 0.14); Omicron phase: OR 0.15 (95% CI 0.12 to 0.19)).

Cross-national analyses demonstrate sustained protection against severe COVID-19 disease for at least 12 months following natural SARS-CoV-2 infection, with vaccination further enhancing protection. Protection against symptomatic reinfection was lower with evidence of waning, but there remained a protective effect beyond 12 months from primary infection.

Chronic low back pain (LBP) imposes significant burden on patients, healthcare systems and society. Physical therapy is a cost-effective method for improving pain and disability; however, only a small number of patients (7–13%) with LBP ever receive physical therapy services. Patients report obstacles to accessing physical therapy, such as transportation, provider availability and missed work. Access is especially limited in rural communities, where approximately 40% fewer physical therapists are available per capita than in metropolitan regions. This lack of access likely contributes to the greater rates of LBP-related disability and opioid consumption in rural communities. Innovative methods for improving access to physical therapy for patients with chronic LBP are urgently needed; these can help address differences in health outcomes and mitigate opioid dependence for patients with chronic LBP living in rural communities. Telerehabilitation increases access to physical therapy, which can potentially improve health outcomes for these patients.

This prospective, individually randomised group treatment trial will involve primary care clinics serving rural communities on Maryland’s Eastern Shore. We will enroll 434 individuals with chronic LBP. Eligible patients will be randomised to either standardised education for back pain delivered via website or to a risk-informed telerehabilitation. Standardised education will be delivered via a study website containing information consistent with materials provided by primary care providers. Risk-informed telerehabilitation will be delivered by trained physical therapists using a web-based, video-enabled telehealth platform. The primary outcome is LBP-related disability. Secondary outcomes are opioid use, pain intensity, health-related quality of life and LBP-related healthcare use assessed using standard patient-reported outcome measures, participant self-report and medical chart abstraction. Implementation outcomes are acceptability, adoption, feasibility and fidelity of our treatment approach guided by the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework and assessed using surveys, semi-structured interviews and key performance metrics.

Ethics approval was obtained from the Johns Hopkins Medicine Institutional Review Boards (IRB), which serves as the single IRB for this trial. Upon completion, study data will be shared in compliance with National Institutes of Health guidelines.

NCT06471920.

Around 70% of people with psychosis experience auditory verbal hallucinations (AVHs), which can cause distress and impair the social functioning of the individual. AVATAR therapy works by facilitating a ‘face-to-face’ dialogue between the person and a digital representation (avatar) of their persecutory voice. Although there is cumulative evidence of this way of working with voices, enhancing the therapeutic focus on improved confidence and sense of control of the voices in social situations represents a promising way to boost generalisation of therapy gains into social contexts. We aim to enhance AVATAR therapy by incorporating immersive Virtual Reality (VR) social environments aiming to help the person to deal better with their voices in daily situations.

A randomised controlled feasibility trial will be conducted. 40 patients aged 18 or above who are at early stages of psychosis (first episode of psychosis in the last five years) and report distressing and interfering voices will be recruited. Participants will be randomised to receive either a novel, enhanced version of AVATAR therapy (AVATAR_VRSocial) in addition to usual care or usual care alone. Assessor-blinded assessments will be conducted at baseline, 3 months (post-intervention) and 6 months (follow­-up). Key therapeutic targets of AVATAR_VRSocial will be those established by the previous evidence of this approach (ie, power and control, self-esteem and future focus), while introducing exposure and management of distressing voices during social interactions. Analyses will focus on feasibility outcomes (recruitment, retention and completion rates) and preliminary estimates of intervention effects. Qualitative interviews will be carried out with participants allocated to AVATAR_VRSocial to gain a comprehensive understanding of participants’ views on the acceptability of the intervention and research procedures. Thematic analysis of the qualitative interviews will assess the acceptability of the intervention, trial procedures and the new VR technology and software involved.

The study has received ethical approval from the Ethics Commission at the Faculty of Psychology (Ruhr-Universität Bochum), and there is an independent Trial Steering Committee and Lived Experience Advisory Panel also supporting it. Findings will be disseminated through peer­-reviewed publications, conference presentations and science dissemination events.

ISRCTN35980117.