Conectar
Poor access to surgical wound swabbing in the community often results in delayed or inappropriate antibiotic prescribing for surgical site infections. This delay can contribute to prolonged wound healing and poor antimicrobial stewardship. Patient self-swabbing at home could improve access to diagnostic testing, but its feasibility and acceptability remain unexplored.
TREASURE is a multicentre, mixed-methods feasibility study. A total of 40 patient participants and 10 staff stakeholders will be included. 40 adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery via median sternotomy will be recruited from Harefield Hospital (n=25) and the Royal Sussex County Hospital (n=15). Eligible participants will receive a coproduced self-swabbing set of instructions and kit at discharge and perform wound swabbing at home within 1–21 days, observed remotely by a researcher via Microsoft Teams. Swabs will be couriered to a central laboratory for bacterial culture with antimicrobial susceptibility testing for pathogens.
The primary feasibility outcome is the proportion of patients successfully completing self-swabbing at home to obtain usable culture swabs with samples received at the laboratory within 24 hours and deemed suitable for processing. Secondary safety and acceptability outcomes include usability of the kit and instructions; patient satisfaction; viability of samples for laboratory analysis; and recruitment and retention rates. A 30-day follow-up will capture wound complications, antibiotic prescribing and healthcare utilisation via patient questionnaires, case note review, general practitioner confirmation and patient interviews. 10 staff stakeholders will be interviewed to inform pathway development.
Quantitative data will be analysed descriptively, with proportions reported alongside 95% CIs. Qualitative data from patients will undergo thematic analysis, and stakeholder interviews will be coded using Normalisation Process Theory. An early health economic model will be developed to explore resource use, costs and proportions of appropriate and timely antibiotic use between current pathways and a proposed pathway, including self-swabbing.
West of Scotland Research Ethics Service has reviewed and approved the study (REC reference: 25/WS/0079). Findings will be disseminated through the study website, a webinar, peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations, patient and public involvement-led activities and engagement with National Health Service (NHS) stakeholders.
Huntington's disease has a disruptive effect on entire families. While previous reviews have examined lived experiences of individuals with Huntington's Disease, their informal caregivers, or their offspring, none have provided a comprehensive overview that integrates these three perspectives.
A scoping review.
Providing an integrated view and a holistic understanding of the multifaceted challenges faced by families affected by Huntington's disease.
We operationalised the lived experiences using the keywords: “barriers”, “facilitators” and “needs”. We extracted and thematically analysed data from 35 articles searched from 1993 to 2023.
Twelve themes were identified, organised into three dimensions: (1) Having the Disease: encompassing the symptoms and progression of the disease; (2) Family Dynamics: reflecting the challenges of living in a household affected by Huntington's disease; and (3) Outside World: describing relationships and interactions with relatives, friends, health services and wider social structures.
The dimensions and related experiences of all three perspectives are intertwined. These experiences are mutually reinforcing, with fluid shifts in perspective occurring between family members. While the needs of family members overlap, they also diverge, highlighting the need for a systemic, family-centred approach to address the evolving challenges faced by all family members.
No Patient or Public Contribution.
To describe the co-creation of the ‘Desired Dementia Care Towards End of Life’ (DEDICATED) approach to improve person-centred palliative care for individuals with dementia and to describe the experiences of healthcare professionals during the approach's implementation.
A needs assessment, comprising both qualitative and quantitative studies, informed palliative care needs of healthcare professionals, family caregivers and individuals with dementia. The approach was co-created with healthcare and education professionals, guided by the findings. Then, healthcare professionals were trained to implement the approach in their organizations. From April to June 2022, semi-structured interviews with actively engaged professionals were analysed using Conventional Content Analysis.
The needs assessment yielded six key themes: (1) raising palliative care awareness, (2) familiarization with a person with dementia, (3) communication about future care preferences, (4) managing pain and responsive behaviour, (5) enhancing interprofessional collaboration in advance care planning and (6) improving interprofessional collaboration during transitions to nursing homes. Interviews with 17 healthcare professionals revealed that active involvement in co-creating or providing feedback facilitated implementation. Overall, the DEDICATED approach was perceived as a valuable toolkit for optimizing palliative care for people with dementia and their loved ones.
Co-creating the DEDICATED approach with healthcare professionals facilitated implementation in daily practice. The approach was considered helpful in enhancing person-centred palliative dementia care.
This study underscores the importance of active involvement of healthcare professionals in the research and development of new interventions or tools for palliative care, which can influence the successful implementation, dissemination and sustained usage of the developed tools.
The developed approach can improve person-centred palliative care for individuals with dementia, ultimately improving their quality of life and that of their loved ones.
This study used the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research.
No patient or public contribution.
There are substantial barriers to initiate advance care planning (ACP) for persons with chronic-progressive disease in primary care settings. Some challenges may be disease-specific, such as communicating in case of cognitive impairment. This study assessed and compared the initiation of ACP in primary care with persons with dementia, Parkinson’s disease, cancer, organ failure and stroke.
Longitudinal study linking data from a database of Dutch general practices’ electronic health records with national administrative databases managed by Statistics Netherlands.
Data from general practice records of 199 034 community-dwelling persons with chronic-progressive disease diagnosed between 2008 and 2016.
Incidence rate ratio (IRR) of recorded ACP planning conversations per 1000 person-years in persons with a diagnosis of dementia, Parkinson’s disease, organ failure, cancer or stroke, compared with persons without the particular diagnosis. Poisson regression and competing risk analysis were performed, adjusted for age, gender, migration background, living situation, frailty index and income, also for disease subsamples.
In adjusted analyses, the rate of first ACP conversation for persons with organ failure was the lowest (IRR 0.70 (95% CI 0.68 to 0.73)). Persons with cancer had the highest rate (IRR 1.75 (95% CI 1.68 to 1.83)). Within the subsample of persons with organ failure, the subsample of persons with dementia and the subsample of stroke, a comorbid diagnosis of cancer increased the probability of ACP. Further, for those with organ failure or cancer, comorbid dementia decreased the probability of ACP.
Considering the complexity of initiating ACP for persons with organ failure or dementia, general practitioners should prioritise offering it to them and their family caregivers. Policy initiatives should stimulate the implementation of ACP for people with chronic-progressive disease.
The COVID-19 pandemic led to major disruptions in society across many spheres, including healthcare, the economy and social behaviours. While early predictions warned of an increased risk of suicide during and after the COVID-19 pandemic, rates of suicide deaths remained stable or decreased over that period for most countries. In contrast, the prevalence of suicidal ideation doubled and suicide attempts slightly increased during the COVID-19 pandemic in the adult general population worldwide, accompanied by a higher prevalence of major depressive disorder and anxiety disorders. While these data can tell us what happened, they cannot tell us why. Qualitative suicide research seeks to understand experiences of individuals with suicide-related thoughts and behaviours, provides an in-depth exploration of their lives and interactions with others and centres their views and unique context. There is little qualitative research focusing on suicidality during the pandemic. This study will use a qualitative approach to explore the extent and impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on Canadians who experienced suicidality and review their experiences of accessing mental healthcare to identify key components in supporting safety and recovery.
This study will involve approximately 100 semistructured interviews with participants across four Canadian provinces and will explore experiences with suicide-related thoughts and behaviours during the COVID-19 pandemic. Transcripts will be analysed through qualitative analysis informed by constructivist grounded theory.
The study was approved by the Research Ethics Board of the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto Academic Health Sciences Network (for JZ: CAMH REB No 104-2022). In addition to traditional peer-reviewed presentations and publications, a report will make study findings accessible to policy makers, media and the public.
To investigate the relationship between demographic characteristics and extracurricular achievements among UK medical students.
National, cross-sectional survey.
All 44 UK medical schools recognised by the General Medical Council.
8,395 medical students.
Binary indicators of extracurricular engagement, including PubMed-indexed authorship, academic presentations, quality improvement projects, leadership roles and academic prizes. Logistic regression models were used to explore associations with demographic and extracurricular achievement predictors.
Logistic regression analysis showed that students from private schools (OR 1.35, CI 1.20 to 1.53, p
Significant disparities in extracurricular achievement exist among UK medical students, principally associated with gender, private schooling and familial links to medicine. Apparent ethnic differences were largely attenuated after adjustment for other variables, indicating socioeconomic factors as stronger predictors of engagement. Given the role of these achievements in postgraduate selection, targeted interventions by medical schools and professional bodies to widen access to funding, mentorship and structured guidance for all students, regardless of perceived advantage, may support equitable opportunity without undermining merit-based standards.
To explore factors influencing UK medical students’ specialty choices and examine variations in these influences across demographic groups and stages of training.
National, cross-sectional online survey.
All 44 UK medical schools recognised by the General Medical Council.
8,395 medical students.
The primary outcome was the specialty preferences of UK medical students. The secondary outcomes were factors behind these preferences and how these factors vary across demographic groups and different stages of training.
General Practice (15.3%), Paediatrics (10.6%) and Anaesthetics (9.9%) were the most preferred specialties among final-year students. Work-life balance (84.1%), compatibility with family life (78.2%), positive training experiences (85.2%) and future specialty outlook (74.9%) were key factors influencing specialty choice. Only 23.1% of students felt confident about securing a specialty training post, with confidence higher among males (OR 1.36, 95% CI 1.21 to 1.52, p
This study highlights disparities in specialty preferences and influencing factors among UK medical students. A focus on improving career guidance, exposure to various specialties and supporting equitable access to training opportunities is essential for fostering a motivated and sustainable medical workforce.
There is high interest in long-acting injectable antiretroviral therapy (LAI-ART) among people with HIV (PWH), with many conveniences for uptake and persistence. However, both patients and clinicians have expressed important barriers to effective implementation, including concerns about frequent clinic visits and strain on clinic resources. Administration of LAI-ART by a trained layperson injector (such as family, friend or partner of the patient) can help mitigate some of these patient-identified and clinician-identified barriers. Alternative LAI-ART delivery methods have the potential to increase the PWH and layperson injector’s confidence, empowerment, convenience, privacy and self-management skills and ultimately facilitate LAI-ART uptake and persistence.
INVITE-Home (innovative administration of long-acting injectables for HIV treatment enhancement at home) will support the expansion of LAI-ART in non-clinical settings by developing, implementing and evaluating a comprehensive, theory-informed training to support the administration of LAI-ART by a trained layperson injector. First, INVITE-Home will design and develop an innovative, theory-based layperson injector training to improve acceptability and uptake of LAI-ART in home-based settings, grounded in qualitative evaluation of training barriers and needs of PWH, layperson injectors and clinicians to develop the training. In Aim 2, INVITE-Home will enhance understanding of home-based LAI-ART using the training, by examining implementation and effectiveness of home-based LAI-ART injections.
This study and its protocols have been approved by the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) Institutional Review Board and the scientific staff of HIV Research Branch, Division of HIV Prevention, National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD and TB Prevention, at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Study staff will disseminate findings locally (eg, to partnering clinics, via the UCSF Center for AIDS Prevention Studies’ Community Engagement Core), statewide (eg, the California Department of Public Health’s Office of AIDS) and nationally at conferences related to HIV.
This study aimed to develop a core outcome set (COS) for trials evaluating the effects of complementary therapies in people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS). We sought to identify the outcomes most relevant to pwMS, their relatives and friends, healthcare professionals and researchers and to propose these for inclusion in future trials.
A participatory international research project using a mixed-method approach with qualitative and quantitative methods. The study included a scoping review and a national survey in Switzerland to identify candidate outcomes, followed by an international COS survey to rate the importance of these outcomes. The final phases involved two consensus meetings to refine and finalise the COS.
Data were sourced from the published literature and input from international stakeholders.
pwMS and other relevant stakeholders, including their relatives and friends, healthcare professionals and researchers.
A total of 770 individuals participated in the international COS survey of 39 candidate outcomes (662 pwMS, 27 relatives/friends, 58 healthcare professionals and 23 researchers). According to the survey results, 13 outcomes were added to the COS, 5 were excluded and 21 were classified as ‘no consensus’. 13 individuals (six pwMS, one pwMS’s friend, three healthcare professionals and three researchers) attended the first consensus meeting. Following the voting on the outcomes without consensus, seven outcomes were added to the COS, four were excluded and 10 outcomes were still classified as ‘no consensus’. The six members of the stakeholders advisory board (one pwMS, four healthcare professionals and two researchers) attended the second consensus meeting to define the final COS. Nine additional outcomes were included in the COS. Sexual problems, an outcome previously excluded, were also added. In total, 30 outcomes were included in the final COS.
We have developed the first COS for future trials of complementary therapies for pwMS. The use of this COS will promote that future research in complementary therapies is relevant for pwMS and other stakeholders involved in MS care. Future COS research should integrate diverse geographical regions, where perspectives and access to complementary therapies may vary.
FreshRSS 