FreshRSS

🔒
❌ Acerca de FreshRSS
Hay nuevos artículos disponibles. Pincha para refrescar la página.
AnteayerTus fuentes RSS

Obinutuzumab versus Rituximab to maintain remission in children with steroid-dependent and frequently relapsing nephrotic syndrome: the OBIRINS study protocol, a double-blind randomised controlled trial

Por: Dossier · C. · Sellier-Leclerc · A.-L. · Simon · T. · Parmentier · C. · Boyer · O. · Samaille · C. · Fila · M. · Roussey-Kesler · G. · Magnavacca · M. · Chartier · Y. · Louillet · F. · Zaloszyc · A. · Vrillon · I. · Elaribi · D. · Bouatia · S. · Kaguelidou · F. · Guilmin-Crepon · S. · Ho
Introduction

There is an unmet clinical need for the development of novel treatment strategies to improve the outcome of children with frequent relapsing or steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome. Obinutuzumab (OBI) is a second-generation anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody that has demonstrated its superiority to rituximab (RTX) in vitro and in vivo. Our assumption is that a single infusion of low-dose OBI will induce longer B-cell depletion, longer sustained remission and reduce the frequency of relapses and the use of oral immunosuppressors compared with a single infusion of RTX.

Methods and analysis

We conduct a double-blind, multicentre, randomised, parallel group in a 1:1 ratio controlled trial. In the experimental group, patients receive 1 infusion of OBI (300 mg/1.73 m2) and in the control group, the patients receive 1 infusion of RTX (375 mg/m2). The primary outcome of the study is the occurrence of the first relapse within 12 months following the initiation of treatment and secondary outcomes include the time to first relapse, the total number of relapses during the 24-month follow-up period, and any adverse events such as infusion-related complications, infectious complications, hypogammaglobulinaemia and neutropenia.

Ethics and dissemination

The study has been approved by the ethics committee (Comité de Protection des Personnes) of Sud Méditerrannée 2 and authorised by the French drug regulatory agency (Agence Nationale de Sécurité du Médicament et des Produits de Santé). Results of the primary study and the secondary aims will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications.

Trial registration number

NCT05786768.

Eudract N°

2022-003336-59.

Understanding Canadian experiences of suicidality during the COVID-19 pandemic: protocol of a pan-Canadian qualitative study

Por: Baharikhoob · P. · Hollenberg · E. · Cuperfain · A. B. · Rudoler · D. · Nicoll · G. · Blumberger · D. · Bolton · J. · Chartier · G. B. · Crawford · A. · Furqan · Z. · Gajaria · A. · Gratzer · D. · Hatcher · S. · Husain · M. I. · Kurdyak · P. · Lam · J. S. H. · Lavergne · M. R. · Marshall
Introduction

The COVID-19 pandemic led to major disruptions in society across many spheres, including healthcare, the economy and social behaviours. While early predictions warned of an increased risk of suicide during and after the COVID-19 pandemic, rates of suicide deaths remained stable or decreased over that period for most countries. In contrast, the prevalence of suicidal ideation doubled and suicide attempts slightly increased during the COVID-19 pandemic in the adult general population worldwide, accompanied by a higher prevalence of major depressive disorder and anxiety disorders. While these data can tell us what happened, they cannot tell us why. Qualitative suicide research seeks to understand experiences of individuals with suicide-related thoughts and behaviours, provides an in-depth exploration of their lives and interactions with others and centres their views and unique context. There is little qualitative research focusing on suicidality during the pandemic. This study will use a qualitative approach to explore the extent and impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on Canadians who experienced suicidality and review their experiences of accessing mental healthcare to identify key components in supporting safety and recovery.

Methods and analysis

This study will involve approximately 100 semistructured interviews with participants across four Canadian provinces and will explore experiences with suicide-related thoughts and behaviours during the COVID-19 pandemic. Transcripts will be analysed through qualitative analysis informed by constructivist grounded theory.

Ethics and dissemination

The study was approved by the Research Ethics Board of the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto Academic Health Sciences Network (for JZ: CAMH REB No 104-2022). In addition to traditional peer-reviewed presentations and publications, a report will make study findings accessible to policy makers, media and the public.

❌