To quantify the per-patient-per-month (PPPM) cost for each phase of care in higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (HR-MDS) and the overall cost of a base-case (illustrative) non-curative management pathway followed by a patient with HR-MDS in England.

We conducted a retrospective, literature-based, micro-costing analysis from the National Health Service (NHS) England provider perspective using published sources and publicly available price lists. No individual-patient data were used. Based on literature, a base-case management pathway followed by a patient with HR-MDS was defined as a diagnostic work-up at month 0, 12 cycles of azacitidine (given for 7 days in each 28-day cycle), 5 months of post-hypomethylating agent (HMA) failure supportive care and 1 month of terminal care.

Healthcare resource utilisation was analysed for adults with HR-MDS who received first-line azacitidine in routine practice if cycle-level or phase-level transfusion and admission rates were reported in the literature. Patients who required allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation or whose HR-MDS transformed to acute myeloid leukaemia were excluded because the diagnostic and/or therapeutic pathways differ. Unit costs for 2024/2025 were taken from published English national sources and an English trust tariff.

PPPM costs were £8721.58 during active azacitidine therapy, £5399.58 after HMA failure and £12 554.58 for hospital-dominant terminal care; a one-off diagnostic work-up with genomics cost £2710 to £2810. The total cost for the base-case management pathway was £146 921 per patient. An alternative pathway excluding genomic testing and assuming hospice-dominant terminal care reduced the total cost to approximately £136 840 to £140 990, depending on whether the lower or upper bound of hospice bed-day costs is applied.

The direct NHS-provider cost burden of this non-curative HR-MDS management pathway is concentrated in azacitidine acquisition and administration during active treatment, transfusions and admissions after HMA failure and setting-dependent costs at the end of life. The total cost for the illustrative management pathway followed by a patient with HR-MDS (£146 921) is of a similar order to the estimate in the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence technology appraisal for azacitidine uprated to £124 848 for 2024/2025. This comparison is provided for context only and should not be interpreted as validation of the present model, given differences in population, model structure, treatment duration and price year. The phase-specific PPPM estimates can inform, subject to local validation and scenario testing, UK budget-impact analyses, service planning and future economic models.

Iron-folic acid (IFA) supplementation in pregnancy is recommended by the WHO, with a dose of 60 mg of iron in contexts where anaemia remains a severe public health problem. Iron-containing supplements may cause side effects that affect acceptability and adherence in a dose-response manner. Maternal multiple micronutrient supplements (MMS), which include iron and folic acid plus additional micronutrients, are also recommended in the context of rigorous research, and programmes are considering transitioning from IFA to MMS containing 30 mg of iron. We will evaluate the effect of iron dose in MMS on maternal acceptability, side effects, adherence and preferences.

The Multiple Micronutrient Supplementation (MMS) Iron Dose Acceptability Crossover Trial is an individually randomised, quadruple-blind, non-inferiority crossover trial of daily antenatal MMS supplementation formulations that contain 60 mg, 45 mg and 30 mg elemental iron among pregnant women in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. A total of 156 pregnant participants will be randomised to a sequence in which they receive each of the three MMS formulations for 1 month. Participants, investigators, outcome assessors and data analysts will be blinded to the treatment sequence. The primary trial outcome is participant-reported acceptability of each MMS formulation, measured on a Likert scale. Secondary and tertiary outcomes include preferred and least preferred formulation, identification of MMS formulation, reported side effects and adherence assessed by pill count. Regression analyses will be used to assess differences between formulations and will account for sequence and period effects of the crossover trial design. Qualitative in-depth interviews from a subsample of participants will be conducted to understand women’s perceptions and experiences taking the different MMS formulations.

The trial protocol was approved by Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health Institutional Review Board (IRB), the Ifakara Health Institute IRB, the Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences IRB, the National Health Research Ethics Sub-Committee and the Tanzania Medicine and Medical Device Authority. Results will be shared through publications and presentations at the local, regional and international levels.

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT06069869.