The institutionalisation of older adults has become increasingly common in Sri Lanka due to recent socioeconomic changes. Tai Chi is a traditional Chinese martial art that provides numerous physical and psychological health benefits. Despite its proven effectiveness, Tai Chi is a relatively new intervention in Sri Lanka, with no local research on its feasibility and efficacy among older adults. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of Tai Chi on physical function and fall risk, lung function, depression, pain and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in older adults residing in aged care homes in Sri Lanka.

A single-arm pretest-posttest feasibility study will be conducted among older adults aged 60 and over (n=40) living in aged care homes in Kandy District, Sri Lanka. A certified Tai Chi instructor will deliver two 60 min sessions of the Tai Chi for Arthritis and Fall Prevention programme per week over a 12-week period in aged care home settings. Acceptability, demand, implementation, practicality, adaptation, integration, expansion and study limitations will be assessed to determine feasibility. Baseline and post-12-week Tai Chi programme outcomes will be assessed, focusing on physical function and fall risk, lung function, pain, depression and HRQOL. Additionally, field notes will be taken during the intervention, and a post-intervention follow-up group discussion will be conducted. Paired t-tests will be used to assess the effectiveness of the Tai Chi programme. A narrative synthesis will be used to analyse qualitative data.

The Research Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Medicine, University of Peradeniya, Sri Lanka, approved this study (No.: 2024/EC/34). Written informed consent will be obtained from each participant before data collection. The findings will be presented at national and international research conferences and published in a reputed journal.

This study was registered with the Sri Lanka Trial Registration (SLCTR/2025/025) at https://slctr.lk/trials/slctr-2025-025 (date: 26 June 2025).

This study intended to investigate barriers to implementing evidence-based intrapartum care during vaginal births, from maternity care providers’ point of view.

A descriptive qualitative study was conducted using in-depth interviews, with data analysed through thematic analysis.

The labour room of a major tertiary care hospital in Central Sri Lanka.

Purposively selected 17 maternity care providers including doctors, nurse managers, nurse-midwives and midwives.

Three major themes and twelve sub-themes were generated: (1) barriers related to care providers (lack of human resources, negative attitudes of care providers, poor relationship among care providers, poor relationship between women and care providers, lack of knowledge on evidence-based practice in childbirth care); (2) barriers related to organisational environment (gaps in management, heavy workload, inadequate physical resources, insufficient in-service training and lack of availability/use of updated guidelines) and (3) barriers related to women’s birth preparedness (women’s limited knowledge on childbirth and intrapartum practices and women’s limited engagement during labour and childbirth). Many maternity care providers perceived that prevailing challenges to implement evidence-based childbirth care were one of the major reasons that impacted the quality of current childbirth care in the labour room.

The findings showed that an integrative approach may be essential to address the diverse barriers to the implementation of evidence-based intrapartum care. It is necessary to engage healthcare administrators, healthcare professionals and care recipients to enhance the quality of current childbirth care in the setting through the successful implementation of evidence-based care.

The study evaluated the feasibility and efficacy of a non-immersive virtual reality (VR) system on upper extremity (UE) recovery in ischaemic stroke patients in comparison to a conventional physiotherapy.

An open-label, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial randomly assigned the participants to two groups, VR intervention or conventional physiotherapy.

Two tertiary stroke care centres in South India participated in the study.

Sixty first-ever ischaemic stroke patients (1–6 months of stroke onset) having spasticity grades of 1 or 1+ as per Modified Ashworth scale and Brunnstrom recovery stages of 3, 4 or 5 in the UE were included in the intention-to-treat analysis.

High-intensity non-immersive VR-based comprehensive rehabilitation gaming system with a duration of 12 weeks (3 days/week) was compared with equally intensive conventional physiotherapy.

The feasibility outcome was the compliance with the treatment. The primary efficacy outcome was the improvement in the motor function assessed by the Fugl-Meyer assessment (FMA) and Wolf motor function test (WMFT). The secondary outcomes included the performance in activities of daily living by the Barthel index (BI) and the quality of life by the 36-item short form health survey (SF-36).

The treatment compliance was similar in two groups (p=0.19). Both groups improved in motor performance, activities of daily living and quality of life. However, there were no significant differences in the FMA (p=0.58), WMFT (functional ability scale, p=0.33; performance time, p=0.44), BI (p=0.84) and SF-36 (physical, p=0.87; mental, p=0.99) scores between the groups.

The non-immersive VR system was feasible, effective and safe; however, it was not found to be superior to conventional physiotherapy. The trial was stopped early and did not reach its proposed sample size and hence, the findings are to be interpreted cautiously.

Clinical trial registry India: CTRI/2021/11/038339 (https://ctri.nic.in/Clinicaltrials/pmaindet2.php?EncHid=NTc1OTI=&Enc=&userName=CTRI/2021/11/038339).

To assess the prevalence and associated factors of dietary practices among antenatal women in Colombo district, Sri Lanka.

This descriptive cross-sectional study examined dietary practices among antenatal mothers in four Medical Officer of Health areas in Colombo, Sri Lanka. A total of 422 participants were selected using stratified random sampling. Data were collected via a validated Food Frequency Questionnaire and analysed using SPSS V.26. Dietary diversity, food variety and animal-source food consumption were assessed. Poisson regression identified predictors of dietary practices, adjusting for socio-economic and pregnancy-related factors. The statistical significance was set at p

Of the 380 antenatal mothers (mean age: 30.72±3.96 years), most were married (98.2%) with 73.7% living in urban areas. Regarding dietary practices, 64.7% had high dietary diversity, while 35.3% had low diversity. Of the sample, 52.1% had a high food variety score and 64.7% had a high animal-source food score. More than half (64.7%) had appropriate dietary practices. Fruits, vitamin A-rich vegetables and rice were the most consumed foods. Key factors influencing dietary practices included age, religion, education, employment and geographical location.

This study highlights the prevalence and factors influencing dietary practices among antenatal mothers. Although the predominant mothers had fair dietary diversities, a considerable number were found to have poor dietary practices. Better dietary practices were associated with major educational attainment, formal employment status and selected residential areas, while younger age, low educational qualification and housewife status were associated with poorer nutrition. The findings indicate that there is an urgent need for interventions related to nutrition for specific vulnerable groups so that they can improve their maternal nutrition and produce better pregnancy outcomes through education and support programmes.

People with serious mental illness (SMI) can experience significant physical health challenges. The Health Champions intervention was developed to support their physical health through using trained volunteers. However, volunteer and patient perspectives on the impact and implementation of this intervention have yet to be understood.

To compare the views of patients and volunteers on the Health Champions intervention.

A qualitative thematic analysis was conducted on interviews with 29 study participants. Interviews were carried out either face-to-face, via Microsoft Teams, or by telephone and included 12 patients (6 men and 6 women) and 17 volunteers (the Health Champions) (5 men and 12 women).

Four overarching themes were identified, highlighting both similarities and differences between stakeholders’ perspectives: (1) supporting goal setting; (2) impact on positive lifestyle; (3) experiences and perception of the programme and (4) navigating challenges during the programme. Both groups found the programme to be largely successful, by motivating patients to work towards their physical health goals and facilitating successful matching of patients with volunteers. Volunteers and patients valued good communication with the research team. Though both groups shared some views on the challenges with scheduling and a lack of face-to-face contact during the COVID-19 pandemic, their perceptions on how patients incorporated their health changes during and after the programme, as well as other administrative concerns such as views on the efficacy of journaling and breakdown of roles, differed.

The Health Champions intervention was perceived as useful to improve the physical health of patients with SMI. Differences in the views between the two stakeholders may result from their distinct experiences and expectations. Future volunteering programmes should further support the diverse physical health needs of patients with SMI.

Unexplained infertility affects about 30% of couples seeking help for infertility, yet the optimal ovulation induction strategy remains largely unclear. Letrozole, clomiphene citrate and gonadotropins are widely used, alone or in combination, with or without intrauterine insemination (IUI), but evidence of comparative effectiveness and safety is inconsistent. Most reviews are restricted to pairwise comparisons or mixed infertility populations. This protocol describes a systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) to compare ovulation induction strategies specifically in unexplained infertility.

Parallel-group randomised controlled trials (RCTs), including women aged 18–40 years with unexplained infertility, will be eligible. Interventions include letrozole, clomiphene citrate, gonadotropins, combination regimens and expectant management/ placebo, with or without IUI. The primary outcome will be live birth per woman randomised; if unavailable, ongoing or clinical pregnancy will be considered. Secondary outcomes include ovulation, multiple pregnancy, miscarriage, ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, ectopic pregnancy, neonatal outcomes, time to pregnancy, adverse events and cycle cancellation rates. Databases (MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus and Web of Science), trial registry (ClinicalTrials.gov), and grey literature (postgraduate theses, conference abstracts and dissertations) will be searched from inception to September 2025. Two reviewers will independently screen, extract data and assess risk of bias (RoB-2). Pairwise random-effects meta-analyses will precede a Bayesian and frequentist NMA (if sufficient network). If feasible, component NMA will be performed to estimate marginal effects of drug and procedural components. Certainty of evidence will be assessed using the CINeMA framework (GRADE for NMA). Publication bias will be assessed using funnel plots and Egger’s test, where feasible.

No ethics approval is required. Findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals, presented at conferences and made available through open-access repositories.

CRD420251145492. The review was registered prospectively; the review start date is 11 September 2025 and the anticipated end date is 3 March 2026.

Suboptimal feeding practices in children under five remain a critical concern, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. Integrated Supplementary Feeding programmes (SFPs) combined with Social and Behaviour Change Communication (SBCC) interventions have shown potential, yet global evidence on their design and effectiveness remains scattered across diverse settings and varies widely in scope and quality. This review aims to map global evidence on integrated SFP and SBCC interventions for children aged 6–59 months, assessing their impact on anthropometric, biochemical, nutritional, health, developmental, functional, microbiological and infant and young child feeding (IYCF) outcomes, and to identify contextual factors, evidence gaps and successful strategies. The review will also aim to document cost effectiveness and economic outcomes of this integrated intervention.

The review will follow Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology, applying the Population–Concept–Context framework and the review title has been registered in Open Science Framework (OSF) (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/ZJ5BG). Eligible studies published between 2000 and 2025 will include community-based interventions for children under five that combine SFP and SBCC. The review will focus on SFP interventions delivered through community-based or public health platforms, including but not limited to take home ration, hot cooked meal, micronutrient powders, coupled with SBCC modalities such as home visits, mobile health and mass media campaigns. Comprehensive searches will be conducted in MEDLINE (PubMed), Cochrane CENTRAL, Google Scholar and organisational websites. Two independent reviewers will screen, extract and appraise studies using Covidence and JBI tools. Data will be analysed using descriptive statistics to summarise study characteristics, intervention types and reported outcomes, helping understand patterns across time and settings. Qualitative findings will be synthesised through descriptive content analysis involving coding and theme development. Expected outcomes include a range of study designs from different settings across the globe, covering diverse delivery models of integrated SFP and SBCC with reported outcomes including dietary indicators, anthropometry, nutritional biomarkers, caregiver practices and cost-effectiveness.

This review is part of a larger cluster randomised controlled trial (NECCTAR) which has received ethical approval from the independent institutional ethics committee of all the participating institutes. The current review will involve only publicly available literature and does not have a separate institutional ethics committee approval. Findings will be disseminated through academic conferences and publications in peer-reviewed journals.

The review title has been registered in OSF (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/ZJ5BG).

Leptospirosis is a significant public health concern worldwide, as it imposes a substantial economic burden on the global economy. Despite a comprehensive search of the relevant literature, few studies evaluating the economic burden experienced by leptospirosis patients were identified. In particular, very few studies thoroughly examined the cost components, including direct, indirect and intangible costs. This paucity of evidence further motivates the need to conduct a more focused search using a systematic review approach. Thus, this study aims to systematically review the global literature on the magnitude and aspects of the direct, indirect and intangible costs incurred by leptospirosis patients and the methods available for assessing these costs.

This review will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols 2015 guidelines. The Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes, Study Design framework was used to develop the review questions. The search strategy will comprise two key term blocks: ‘Leptospirosis’ and ‘Economic cost’. A comprehensive literature search will be conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, MEDLINE, CINAHL, the Cochrane Library, EconStor and IDEAS to collect publications from inception to July 2025. The search will be limited only to English-language and peer-reviewed publications. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool will be used to assess the quality of eligible studies. Extracted cost data will be categorised into direct, indirect and intangible costs. A meta-analysis will be conducted to quantify the magnitude of these costs if sufficient methodological and contextual homogeneity exists. Moreover, a narrative synthesis will be performed to analyse the qualitative data related to intangible costs.

As this study will use secondary data, ethical approval is not required. The systematic review’s findings will be published in a scientific journal and presented at relevant conferences to address the knowledge gap regarding the economic burden (including direct, indirect and intangible costs) faced by leptospirosis patients. The results of this systematic review will guide policies for prioritising prevention, improving surveillance and efficiently allocating resources to control leptospirosis.

PROSPERO CRD 42024585056.

Type 2 diabetes is a growing global health challenge that requires effective prevention strategies. Public health and community-based approaches play an essential role in reaching vulnerable populations and addressing broader determinants of health. This protocol outlines a scoping review aimed at systematically mapping the existing evidence on lifestyle-based diabetes prevention interventions implemented in public health and community contexts.

A systematic literature search will be conducted to identify relevant studies published in English or German from 1 January 2014 onwards. The following databases will be searched: PubMed, Web of Science Core Collection, CINAHL (via EBSCO), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (via OVID) and ClinicalTrials.gov. Relevant websites and grey literature sources will be searched to identify further eligible studies. (Cluster-)randomised controlled trials, non-randomised controlled trials and clinical trials will be included. These must examine nutrition-based, physical activity-based or lifestyle-based interventions aimed at preventing type 2 diabetes in healthy adults or individuals with pre-diabetes, implemented in public health or community settings. Case reports and studies involving medical therapies or pharmacological interventions will be excluded. The literature search started in May 2025 and is expected to be completed by the end of December 2025.

As this scoping review is based on the secondary analysis of publicly available data, no ethical approval is required. Our dissemination strategy includes publication in peer-reviewed journals, presentations at academic conferences and targeted dissemination to relevant interest holders.

This project has been registered at Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/zafg5/), as PROSPERO does not accept registrations for scoping reviews.

Students enrolling in higher education often adopt lifestyles linked to worse mental health, potentially contributing to the peak age onset of mental health problems in early adulthood. However, extensive research is limited by focusing on single lifestyle behaviours, including single time points, within limited cultural contexts, and focusing on a limited set of mental health symptoms.

The UNIversity students’ LIFEstyle behaviours and Mental health cohort (UNILIFE-M) is a prospective worldwide cohort study aiming to investigate the associations between students’ lifestyle behaviours and mental health symptoms during their college years. The UNILIFE-M will gather self-reported data through an online survey on mental health symptoms (ie, depression, anxiety, mania, sleep problems, substance abuse, inattention/hyperactivity and obsessive/compulsive thoughts/behaviours) and lifestyle behaviours (ie, diet, physical activity, substance use, stress management, social support, restorative sleep, environment and sedentary behaviour) over 3.5 years. Participants of 69 universities from 28 countries (300 per site) will be assessed at university admission in the 2023 and/or the 2024 academic year and followed up for 1, 2 and 3.5 years.

The study was first approved at a national level in Brazil (CAE:63025822.8.1001.5346). Study sites outside Brazil obtained additional ethics approval from their institutions using the main approval. Results from the UNILIFE-M cohort will be disseminated through scientific publications, presentations at scientific meetings, press releases, the general media and social media.

Poor cardiopulmonary fitness is an important risk factor for postoperative complications, yet a feasible, objective and prognostically accurate method to assess preoperative fitness has not been established. The 6 min walk test (6MWT) is a simple, inexpensive and widely applicable measure that shows promise for predicting postoperative risk. However, robust data are lacking on whether the 6MWT accurately predicts complications, provides incremental prognostic value beyond routinely collected clinical factors or outperforms simpler alternatives such as questionnaires, cardiac biomarkers or grip strength testing. The Functional Assessment for Surgery by a Timed Walk (FAST Walk) study is designed to address these knowledge gaps by evaluating whether the 6MWT improves prediction of key postoperative outcomes compared with clinical factors and simpler measures of fitness.

The FAST Walk study is an international multicentre prospective cohort study of 1672 adults (≥40 years) undergoing major elective non-cardiac surgery at centres in Canada, Hong Kong, Australia, Spain and the Netherlands. Participants complete a preoperative 6MWT and baseline assessments of comorbidities, self-reported cardiopulmonary fitness (MET: Re-evaluation for Perioperative Cardiac Risk questionnaire), biomarkers (N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide) and grip strength. The primary outcome is 30-day death or major postoperative complication, defined as Clavien-Dindo grade II or higher. Secondary outcomes are (1) death or new significant disability at 90 days after surgery and (2) days alive and out of hospital at 30 days after surgery. Disability is measured using the short-form WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 instrument. Multivariable regression models and complementary metrics of prediction performance will be used to determine whether 6MWT distance adds prognostic value beyond routinely collected clinical factors and simpler measures of fitness.

The FAST Walk study has received research ethics board approval at all participating sites. Recruitment commenced in June 2024, with completion of participant follow-up expected in 2026. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations, with the primary results anticipated in 2027.

NCT06412367.

To assess diagnostic concordance and reclassification following an India-led, multinational virtual multidisciplinary discussion (V-MDD) platform for interstitial lung disease (ILD).

Prospective, multicentre service-evaluation study.

Twenty-four Indian referral centres connected through a secure virtual platform, with international faculty participation from the UK, Greece and Sri Lanka.

A total of 127 anonymised ILD cases discussed across 29 V-MDD sessions (February 2024–February 2025). Each panel included ≥4 pulmonologists, two pulmonary pathologists, one of three rotating thoracic radiologists and one of two rheumatologists, along with international experts.

The cohort (mean age 52.6±16.1 years; 53.5% female (68/127)) most frequently presented with dyspnoea (82.6%) and cough (73.2%). Pre-V-MDD diagnoses included hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP) and sarcoidosis as distinct disease entities, and usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) and non-specific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP) as radiological patterns, along with connective tissue disease (CTD)-ILD and other ILDs. Concordance between pre- and post-V-MDD CT diagnoses was substantial (=0.658; 95% CI 0.562 to 0.754; p

The India-led, multinational V-MDD model demonstrated substantial diagnostic concordance and refined nearly one-quarter of ILD diagnoses. This virtual, scalable framework expands access to subspecialty expertise and offers a practical blueprint for standardising ILD care in resource-limited and cross-border settings.

Paediatric palliative care (PPC) improves the quality of life of children with life-limiting and life-threatening conditions, with caregivers playing an important role. Providing PPC in low-income and lower-middle-income countries (LMICs) is challenging due to limited resources, inadequate access to specialised care, financial constraints, and cultural or religious beliefs. This study aims to synthesise qualitative research on the experiences of primary care givers caring for children with cancer receiving palliative care in LMICs.

A systematic search will be conducted using electronic databases: MEDLINE (Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online), Embase, CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Health Literature), Web of Science, and PsycINFO. Additional articles will be searched in the reference list of the selected articles. Review questions will be framed into different components according to the Population, phenomena of Interest, Context, and Outcome (PICO) framework. Primary caregivers of children with cancer will be the population of interest. Both title and abstract screening and full-text screening will be done by two independent reviewers. The quality of included studies will be assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal checklist for qualitative research. The thematic synthesis approach will be followed as it will allow a transparent summarising of the qualitative data.

This study is not subject to ethics approval, as the work is carried out on published documents. The findings of this review will be disseminated among a broader audience through scientific channels, including publication in open-access journals and presentations at both national and international forums.

CRD420251065491.

To explore the perspectives and experiences related to caring for older people during clinical placement among undergraduate nursing students.

A qualitative exploratory study analysing individual interview data.

Department of Nursing, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, University of Peradeniya, Sri Lanka.

Participants: A purposive sample of 14 undergraduate nursing students.

Semi-structured in-depth interviews were conducted, audio-recorded and transcribed. Data were analysed using Braun and Clarke’s reflexive thematic analysis framework.

Five themes emerged: (1) understanding ageing: The concept of ‘Age’, (2) Complexity of care: navigating challenges, (3) Care provision: rewards, growth and fulfilment, (4) Addressing challenges: barriers to support and (5) Reaching the horizon: enhancing geriatric education. Nursing students encountered both positive and negative experiences related to caring for older people. Positive experiences included increased self-awareness, learning opportunities, skill development and personal satisfaction. Negative experiences involved student-related and patient-related challenges, initial difficulties in providing care and inadequate support and mentoring during clinical placements.

Despite the complexities of caring for older people, nursing students are motivated to learn and provide the necessary care. This study highlights the need for quality care for older people, the importance of early geriatric education and the need for enhancing clinical supervision and mentoring.