Conectar
by Hemant Mahajan, Poppy Alice Carson Mallinson, Judith Lieber, Santhi Bhogadi, Santosh Kumar Banjara, Anoop Shah, Vipin Gupta, Gagandeep Kaur Walia, Bharati Kulkarni, Sanjay Kinra
Background and AimCardiovascular diseases (CVDs) represent a growing public-health challenge in India, where nearly one in four deaths is CVD-related. Accurate risk stratification underpins targeted prevention, yet laboratory-dependent tools are often impractical in resource-limited settings. The World Health Organization (WHO) and GLOBORISK initiatives both offer non-laboratory-based 10-year CVD risk algorithms alongside their laboratory-based counterparts. We aimed to compare laboratory- and non-laboratory-based WHO and GLOBORISK CVD risk scores, assess their concordance, and examine relationships with sub-clinical atherosclerosis in a rural Indian cohort.
Materials and MethodsWe conducted a cross-sectional analysis of 2,465 adults (1,184 men, 1,281 women) aged 40−74 years from the third wave (2010−12) of the Andhra Pradesh Children and Parents Study (APCAPS). Participants with prior CVD were excluded. Ten-year CVD risk was calculated using sex-specific WHO (South Asia) and India-calibrated GLOBORISK models, both laboratory-based (age, sex, smoking, systolic blood pressure, diabetes, total cholesterol) and non-laboratory-based (age, sex, smoking, systolic blood pressure, BMI) algorithms. Categorical agreement was quantified via percentage agreement and quadratic weighted kappa (κ); continuous agreement by Bland-Altman analysis. We also evaluated linear associations between each risk score (categorical and continuous) and three sub-clinical atherosclerosis markers: carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT), pulse-wave velocity (PWV), and augmentation index (AIx), through sex-stratified multi-level linear regression with random intercept at the household level, adjusting for multiple testing (p Results
Median WHO-CVD-risk was 6.0% (IQR 4% − 9%) in men and 3.0% (2% − 4%) in women for both lab and non-lab models; median GLOBORISK-CVD-risk was 12.0% (9% − 16%) for lab-model vs. 15.0% (10% − 16%) for non-lab-model in men and 5.0% (3% − 9%) for lab-model vs. 5.0% (3% − 9%) for non-lab-model in women. Categorical agreement was substantial to almost perfect: WHO κ = 0.82 (overall), GLOBORISK κ = 0.72. Bland-Altman analyses demonstrated mean differences Conclusion
Non-laboratory-based WHO and GLOBORISK CVD risk scores exhibit high overall agreement with laboratory-based models and correlate strongly with subclinical atherosclerosis in rural India. However, modest underestimation in high-risk subgroups (diabetics, hypercholesterolemia) warrants cautious interpretation. These findings support the feasibility of non-lab risk assessment in resource-constrained settings, while underscoring the need for prospective validation against hard cardiovascular outcomes prior to large-scale implementation.
Suboptimal feeding practices in children under five remain a critical concern, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. Integrated Supplementary Feeding programmes (SFPs) combined with Social and Behaviour Change Communication (SBCC) interventions have shown potential, yet global evidence on their design and effectiveness remains scattered across diverse settings and varies widely in scope and quality. This review aims to map global evidence on integrated SFP and SBCC interventions for children aged 6–59 months, assessing their impact on anthropometric, biochemical, nutritional, health, developmental, functional, microbiological and infant and young child feeding (IYCF) outcomes, and to identify contextual factors, evidence gaps and successful strategies. The review will also aim to document cost effectiveness and economic outcomes of this integrated intervention.
The review will follow Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology, applying the Population–Concept–Context framework and the review title has been registered in Open Science Framework (OSF) (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/ZJ5BG). Eligible studies published between 2000 and 2025 will include community-based interventions for children under five that combine SFP and SBCC. The review will focus on SFP interventions delivered through community-based or public health platforms, including but not limited to take home ration, hot cooked meal, micronutrient powders, coupled with SBCC modalities such as home visits, mobile health and mass media campaigns. Comprehensive searches will be conducted in MEDLINE (PubMed), Cochrane CENTRAL, Google Scholar and organisational websites. Two independent reviewers will screen, extract and appraise studies using Covidence and JBI tools. Data will be analysed using descriptive statistics to summarise study characteristics, intervention types and reported outcomes, helping understand patterns across time and settings. Qualitative findings will be synthesised through descriptive content analysis involving coding and theme development. Expected outcomes include a range of study designs from different settings across the globe, covering diverse delivery models of integrated SFP and SBCC with reported outcomes including dietary indicators, anthropometry, nutritional biomarkers, caregiver practices and cost-effectiveness.
This review is part of a larger cluster randomised controlled trial (NECCTAR) which has received ethical approval from the independent institutional ethics committee of all the participating institutes. The current review will involve only publicly available literature and does not have a separate institutional ethics committee approval. Findings will be disseminated through academic conferences and publications in peer-reviewed journals.
The review title has been registered in OSF (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/ZJ5BG).
In patients with post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC), depression has been associated with symptom severity, the duration since infection and ongoing functional impairment. However, the interconnections between these factors remain inadequately understood.
This study aimed to explore the roles of depressive symptoms in moderating and mediating the relationships between post-COVID-19 conditions and functional capacity.
The PERCEIVE study recruited 1794 participants from Victoria and Tasmania through online advertisements based on possible PASC for a cross-sectional study. Of these, 461 participated in the longitudinal study. Post-COVID-19 duration and symptoms were recorded, and depressive symptoms and functional capacity were self-reported using the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire and the Duke Activity Status Index (DASI), respectively. The association of depression with functional capacity was explored using ordinary least squares (OLS) regression, with companion OLS models, Sobel-Goodman tests and 1000 bootstrap iterations to assess mediation. Longitudinal data were analysed to assess changes in functional capacity and depressive symptoms over time, with mediation analysis using mixed models to explore depression as a mediator.
Participants had a mean DASI score of 35 (SD 21). Fatigue (18%), shortness of breath (11%) and chest pain (6%) were common symptoms, with severe depression linked to fatigue (93%) and shortness of breath (66%). The severity of post-COVID-19 symptoms was associated with severe depression (β=6.31, 95% CI 5.42 to 7.21) and reduced functional capacity (β=–6.40, 95% CI –9.20 to –3.61), with depression mediating 36% of the association between post-COVID-19 symptom severity and functional capacity. PASC was associated with higher depression scores (β=2.06, 95% CI 1.15 to 2.97) and lower functional capacity (β=–3.99, 95% CI –6.21 to –1.77), with depression mediating 51% of the association between PASC and reduced functional capacity. The longitudinal analysis suggested that depression is associated with the relationship between PASC and changes in functional capacity over time (unstandardised estimate=–5.16, p
Depression plays a key role in exacerbating post-COVID-19 functional impairment. This observation underscores the need for targeted physical and mental health interventions to enhance long-term recovery for those with severe conditions.
Black ethnic cohorts, when compared with white cohorts, have disproportionately higher rates of essential hypertension and related complications. Ethnic differences in the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system have been identified in black ethnic cohorts displaying a low-renin, salt-sensitive phenotype in comparison to white individuals. Studies have highlighted lower levels of aldosterone in black cohorts compared with white cohorts. However, when renin is considered, in the form of the aldosterone-renin ratio (ARR), the ARR is higher in black cohorts. The Framingham study highlighted that people in the upper quartile for baseline aldosterone were more likely to have a higher blood pressure and develop hypertension at 4 year follow-up. Therefore, the inappropriately suppressed aldosterone may be contributing to the ethnic differences in hypertension prevalence and prognosis.
Four databases will be searched (MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus and Cochrane Library) to identify eligible studies from database creation to August 2025. Two investigators will independently review the search results and document reasons for full-text exclusions. The main outcomes are to assess if there are ethnic differences in baseline aldosterone, baseline plasma renin activity (PRA) and ARR. We will also look at ethnic differences in regulatory mechanisms of aldosterone, such as serum potassium and 24 hour urinary electrolytes, that may explain the potential differences in aldosterone and ARR in black and white ethnic cohorts. Studies looking at normotensive and hypertensive individuals will be included. Studies in paediatric populations (
As this review will involve analysis of previously published data, ethical approval is not required. The results will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal.
CRD420251025642.
FreshRSS 