To assess the acceptability and adoption of multiparameter point-of-care testing (POCT) devices for the diagnosis and management of non-communicable diseases (NCDs) at the primary healthcare level in a resource-limited region of Peru.

Qualitative case-control process evaluation.

Eight primary healthcare facilities in northern Peru, including both urban and rural centres, where routine chronic care and laboratory services are provided.

Sixty-three participants: 36 patients, 12 laboratory technicians, 10 healthcare professionals and five facility heads. Eligible patients were ≥18 years, residing in the catchment area, with or without prior NCD diagnoses. Healthcare workers, including physicians, nurses, laboratory staff and facility managers.

Multiparameter POCT devices were installed in four intervention facilities, accompanied by staff training and community awareness activities, while four control facilities continued with conventional laboratory diagnostics.

Primary outcome: perceptions of patients and healthcare workers regarding the acceptability and adoption of POCT devices. Secondary outcomes: identification of facilitators and barriers to implementation, including infrastructure, supply chains and training gaps.

(1) Individuals: POCT was valued for speed and comfort, but concerns over accuracy were mentioned. (2) Intervention characteristics: laboratory staff valued POCT’s practicality in emergencies, but noted limitations in handling multiple samples. (3) Outer setting: urban centres outperformed rural facilities, with more staff and longer operating hours. (4) Inner setting: calibration gaps impacted POCT and conventional test reliability, requiring quality control and training. (5) Process: clear staff communication boosted patient confidence in POCT, but inconsistent training could lead to reliability doubts.

Multiparameter POCT devices show promise for enhancing NCD care in resource-limited primary healthcare settings, particularly in rural areas. However, their sustainability depends on broader health system reforms, including reliable supply chains, expanded training and stronger quality assurance mechanisms. Further research should examine strategies for embedding POCT within national regulatory and policy frameworks.

Many medical students with mental health problems do not seek help. However, it is unclear what medical schools can do to promote help seeking. We sought to establish the effect of medical school initiatives on help seeking for mental health problems among medical students.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies published between 2013 and 2023.

MEDLINE Ovid, EMBASE Ovid, PsycINFO Ovid, Web of Science, ERIC, BEI and Education Abstracts.

Studies that assess the effect of an intervention delivered by a university or healthcare organisation on medical students’ attitudes towards help seeking or their help-seeking behaviour for mental health problems.

Two reviewers independently screened studies for inclusion and extracted data. Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 (for randomised controlled trials (RCTs)) and Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies of Interventions (for non-randomised studies). Studies were grouped according to intervention type. Meta-analysis was conducted using random-effects models. Certainty of evidence was assessed using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluations.

The evidence from the meta-analyses was of very low to low certainty. Improvements in help seeking were noted in the meta-analyses of pre-post studies investigating the effect of interventions with a lived-experience component (five studies, n=492, standardised mean difference (SMD) 0.62, 95% CI 0.33 to 0.91, p

Overall, the evidence is of very low to low certainty, due to the serious risk of bias in the included studies, most of which used uncontrolled pre-post designs. Interventions with a lived-experience component may improve medical students’ help-seeking attitudes. Standard clinical clerkships did not appear to impact personal help seeking, despite multiple previous studies suggesting they reduce stigma, suggesting barriers to help seeking extend beyond stigma and mental health literacy in this student population. Further high-quality research, particularly RCTs with long-term follow-up, is needed to firm up the evidence base in this area.

CRD42024319771.

Vaccines are our best defence against infectious diseases, yet uptake of childhood immunisation programmes has consistently declined in the UK, with growing concerns around socioeconomic inequalities. Liverpool, in particular, demonstrated some of the lowest uptake rates in England since 2019. In response, the Health Equity Liverpool Project (HELP) implemented a hyper-localised community-led initiative between September 2023 and June 2024 to tackle vaccine hesitancy. Activities included outreach events and school-based engagement across nine sites within Liverpool. Despite promising qualitative evidence, the intervention’s impact on childhood vaccine uptake has not yet been quantified. We aim to evaluate the population level impact of the HELP intervention on the uptake of five childhood vaccines (first and second doses of the measles, mumps and rubella vaccine (MMR1, MMR2), 6-in-1 vaccine (diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, polio, haemophilus influenzae type b and hepatitis B), pneumococcal conjugate vaccine booster dose (PCV) and rotavirus vaccine) using synthetic control methods.

We will analyse publicly available quarterly vaccine uptake data (between April 2019 and March 2025) from the Cover of Vaccination Evaluated Rapidly programme for general practices (GPs) in England. The intervention group will be defined as practices located within a 1 km radius of the intervention sites. A synthetic control group will be constructed using non-intervention GPs matched on pre-intervention vaccine uptake, and linked demographic, socioeconomic and healthcare capacity covariates. Primary outcomes are the uptake of MMR1 and MMR2 vaccines. Secondary outcomes include the uptake of 6-in-1, PCV and rotavirus vaccines. Average treatment effects will be estimated as the post-intervention difference in uptake between intervention and synthetic control groups. Sensitivity analyses will examine spillover effects, alternative spatial definitions of exposure, the biasing effect of concurrent interventions and the feasibility of analysis at small area neighbourhood level.

This study will be conducted as part of the ReCITE project, which has received ethical approval from the Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine Research Ethics Committee (Reference: 24–018) and is funded by the UK Arts and Humanities Research Council (Project Number: AH/Z505341/1). Findings will be shared with the project funder and submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal.

Breast and cervical cancers are among the most commonly diagnosed cancers in Ghana and impose substantial financial burden on households. Although diagnosis and treatment for these cancers are included in the National Health Insurance Scheme (NHIS) benefits package, stakeholders report limitations in the scope and implementation of coverage, leading to out-of-pocket payments and potential delays in care.

To characterise NHIS coverage for breast and cervical cancer care and to explore challenges affecting implementation from the perspectives of key stakeholders.

Qualitative exploratory study using semi-structured key informant interviews and a focused desk review of national guidelines and NHIS policy documents.

12 key informants were purposively sampled based on roles in cancer policy, financing or service delivery.

Although the NHIS officially lists coverage for consultation, diagnosis, radiotherapy and selected chemotherapy medications, participants reported that these benefits are not fully realised in practice. Respondents described persistent out-of-pocket payments for breast and cervical cancer services due to incomplete or delayed reimbursement of screening and diagnostic costs, limited inclusion of costly imaging procedures and the exclusion of some essential and innovative therapies, including immunotherapy. Delayed NHIS reimbursement was cited as a recurrent problem that constrains facility cash flow and contributes to co-payments at the point of care. Stakeholders also highlighted misalignment between NHIS reimbursement tariffs and actual service costs, which discourages some facilities from providing certain listed services and thereby limits patient access.

NHIS coverage for breast and cervical cancer care still contains significant gaps, particularly in preventive services and access to advanced therapies. Policy actions should focus on strengthening preventive coverage (including screening and human papillomavirus vaccination), aligning tariffs with service costs, ensuring timely reimbursements and updating the medicines list through transparent, evidence-informed review processes.

Although individuals with dementia who reside in nursing homes are particularly susceptible to developing delirium, this condition is rarely recognised in these settings. Detection of delirium requires validated and reliable tools for this setting that can be applied by nursing staff. The primary objective of the study is to assess the comprehensibility, practicality and inter-rater reliability of two delirium detection tools (4 A’s test (4AT) and 4-item delirium superimposed on dementia (4-DSD)) and one tool for assessing both the diagnosis and severity of delirium (Delirium Rating Scale-Revised-98 (DRS-R-98)) in people with dementia who reside in nursing homes when used by nurses.

The comprehensibility and practicality of the German versions of the 4AT, 4-DSD and DRS-R-98 will be evaluated using cognitive interviews in accordance with the consensus-based standards for the selection of health measurement instruments framework. On the basis of the results of the cognitive interviews, a manual for each of the three tools will be developed and finalised by an expert panel. Finally, the inter-rater reliability and measurement error of the three tools will be determined using the manuals. For this purpose, a total of 70 residents from six nursing homes will be assessed by at least two nurses. The data analysis will include descriptive statistics and inter-rater reliability assessment for individual items (kappa value) and total scores (Intraclass correlation coefficients).

This study will assess the comprehensibility, practicality and inter-rater reliability of the 4AT, 4-DSD and DRS-R-98 for use in residents with dementia in nursing homes. The project was approved by the medical ethics committee of the University of Oldenburg (reference number: 2025-093).

The inter-rater reliability study was registered in the German Clinical Trials Register. Registration number: DRKS00037458 (https://www.drks.de/search/de/trial/DRKS00037458/details).

Etrasimod is an oral, once-daily, selective sphingosine 1-phosphate_1,4,5 receptor modulator for the treatment of moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC). While etrasimod demonstrated efficacy in randomised controlled trials, understanding its effectiveness in an observational setting is crucial.

EFFECT-UC is a prospective, multinational, non-interventional study to evaluate the real-world effectiveness of etrasimod in adults with moderately to severely active UC. The study consists of a 52-week treatment period and a 28-day safety follow-up period and aims to enrol ~300 patients per cohort. Eligible patients (18–64 years) are advanced therapy naïve or experienced and are initiating etrasimod in a real-world clinical setting. Treatment will be guided independently by the clinician’s judgement. Patient-reported outcomes will be collected electronically throughout the study and daily for the first 2 weeks. Exploratory data, including faecal calprotectin, endoscopy and intestinal ultrasound, will be collected at predefined visits or during standard care. Primary endpoints are symptomatic remission at week 12 and week 52. Secondary endpoints include patient-reported outcome 2 (combined rectal bleeding and stool frequency subscores) response at week 12 and week 52 and corticosteroid-free symptomatic remission at week 52.

Ethics approval was obtained for all sites. Recruitment is underway for cohort 1, comprising patients from the UK, Germany and Canada. Interim results for this cohort are expected in 2026 and final results in 2028; these will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals and presented at appropriate congresses.

NCT06294925.

To develop an updated core dataset for acute stroke care in Ireland, informed by international audit benchmarking and national stakeholder consensus, for integration into the Irish National Audit of Stroke (INAS).

Scoping review and three-round Delphi process.

Medline Ovid, Embase, CINAHL EBSCOhost, Google Scholar, audit websites and grey literature (2010–2024). Additional audit documentation was obtained via direct author contact.

National stroke audits or registries with a country-wide scope, ≥1 year of continuous data collection and active in 2021 were eligible. Only audits covering acute stroke care were included in this study phase. All records were screened for inclusion.

Audit documentation (data dictionaries, item definitions and contextual metadata) was retrieved from eligible audits. Acute stroke care items were extracted, charted and benchmarked against existing INAS items and each other to identify commonalities and gaps. Frequently collected international items (appearing in ≥4 audits/registries) were shortlisted. A three-round Delphi process with 24 national stakeholders (clinicians, nurses, allied health professionals, researchers, policymakers and patient representatives) was conducted to audit and refine the dataset through structured, anonymised item rating, iterative feedback and consensus-building discussions.

Twenty-one eligible international stroke audits/registries were identified, yielding ~4500 audit items. Benchmarking against existing INAS items (n=103), frequently collected international items (n=97) and expert-suggested items (n=22) informed the Delphi consultation. The final dataset expanded INAS by 18 items, totalling 86 acute care and 35 thrombectomy-specific items. New additions included stroke-related complications and risk factor documentation.

This structured, consensus-led process resulted in an internationally benchmarked, stakeholder-informed core dataset to enhance standardised stroke auditing in Ireland. The expanded dataset supports enhanced clinical monitoring, quality improvement and health system planning. This approach may inform audit development and research efforts in other contexts.

To examine trends in preconception and pregnancy cardiometabolic risk factors and conditions, pregnancy and birth complications, obstetric interventions, and the impact of COVID-19, and to forecast future disease burden.

A multi-centre retrospective cohort study.

A large hospital network with three maternity hospitals serving ethnically diverse populations in Melbourne, Australia.

Pregnant women who gave birth between 2016 and 2022.

Trends in cardiometabolic conditions, birth complications and obstetric interventions.

Over 7 years, 63 232 women were included, of whom 40% were nulliparous, and 60.9% were born overseas from 167 countries. From 2016–2022, maternal age (30.2–31.3 years), obesity (21.0%–26.2%), gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) (15.9%–28.1%) and caesarean delivery (28.5%–37.6%) increased, while average gestational weight gain, premature births and special care admissions declined from 12.6–11.6 kg, 6.3%–4.9% and 24.2%–14.1%, respectively; and was statistically significant (p

Prepregnancy and pregnancy cardiometabolic risk factors and conditions, pregnancy and birth complications, and obstetric interventions increased markedly over 7 years. Despite this, offspring complications, including special care admissions, stillbirths and prematurity, decreased, while pregnancy complications peaked during COVID-19. GDM is forecasted to increase to 43.0% by 2028, posing an unsustainable health and economic burden that necessitates urgent public health initiatives.

Public involvement in mental health research enhances research quality. The use of citizen science methods in mental health research has been described as a conclusion of a movement towards increased public involvement; however, this field is in its early stages of development. Our objective was to create a theory of change (ToC) for how citizen science can be used to enhance mental health research quality.

Iterative consultation with the stakeholders of an existing citizen mental health science study, that is, change for citizen science to achieve co-production at scale (C-STACS: https://www.researchintorecovery.com/research/c-stacs/)

We co-developed a ToC through an iterative consultation with C-STACS stakeholders who were (a) representatives of mental health community organisations (n=10), individuals with public involvement experience (n=2) and researchers (n=5). In keeping with established ToC practice, entities were identified, including long-term impacts, outcomes needed to create an impact, stakeholder assumptions and indicators for tracking progress.

A desired primary long-term impact of greater co-production of research was identified between researchers and members of the public, which would create a secondary impact of enhancing public capacity to engage in citizen mental health science. We proposed long-term outcomes needed to enable this impact: (1) greater co-production of research objectives and pathways between researcher and the public, (2) greater embedment of citizen mental health science into funder processes (eg, the creation of specific funding calls for citizen mental health science proposals, (3) greater clarity on the boundaries between citizen science and other participatory approaches (eg, so that there is not loss of impact due to conceptual confusion between these, (4) increased knowledge around effective frameworks to enable mass public participation and (5) greater availability of technology platforms, enabling safe and accessible engagement with citizen mental health science projects.

The proposed ToC is grounded in the C-STACS project, but intended to be broadly applicable. It allows the continued formation of a community of practice around citizen mental health science and should be reviewed, as greater knowledge is developed on how citizen mental health science creates change.

Patients in intensive care units (ICUs) frequently require mechanical ventilation, with approximately half needing invasive ventilation through an orotracheal tube. For these patients, gastric tube (GT) insertion is routinely performed to administer nutrition and medications or to drain gastric contents. The insertion route (oral or nasal) may affect the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), a significant ICU care complication. This study aims to compare the impact of oral versus nasal GT insertion on the incidence of VAP in intubated ICU patients.

The SONG trial (NCT 05915663) is a multicentre, open-label, two-period, two-intervention, cluster randomised crossover superiority trial. 16 French ICUs will participate. ICUs will be randomised to periods of nasogastric or orogastric tube placement. The trial includes a practice standardisation period, followed by two 12-month inclusion periods separated by a monitoring and washout period. The primary endpoint is the incidence rate of VAP at day 28, confirmed by three independent physicians. Secondary endpoints include the ease of GT insertion, measured by the number of attempts.

This study received approval from a central ethical review board on 12 April 2024 (CPP Sud-est VI, registration number 23.00943.000175). Patients are included after informed consent or, when not possible, from next of kin. If none are available, the investigator will proceed with emergency inclusion, following French law. When consent is initially obtained from the next of kin or through emergency inclusion, the investigator will seek consent from the patient as soon as possible. Data will be anonymised and patient confidentiality maintained. Results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at scientific meetings.

NCT05915663.

In the intensive care unit (ICU), brain-injured patients are frequently exposed to mechanical ventilation to protect the brain and preserve physiology. After intracranial pressure control and sedation withdrawal, this population is prone to residual disorder of consciousness and altered neurological control of respiratory drive, cough and airway protection. Consequently, extubation failure is more frequent than in general ICU patients, and there is no clear evidence-based clinical trigger for extubation. Different risk factors for extubation failure were described in observational trials, and clinical scores were constructed to detect patients at higher risk of extubation failure. Nevertheless, none of these scores were prospectively tested as interventional tools to prevent extubation failure. The Brain-Injured Patients Extubation Readiness (BIPER) study is an ongoing multicentre stepped-wedge cluster-randomised controlled trial aiming to test one of these scores as an intervention protocol to decrease extubation failure in neurocritical care patients with residual disorder of consciousness.

Trial design: Stepped-wedge cluster-randomised controlled trial with five groups of three to six clusters (20 ICUs). Groups of clusters are randomised to five possible sequences of nine periods with crossing from a control condition period (usual care for extubation) to an intervention condition period (BIPER-guided extubation protocol), separated by a 3-month transition period.

Participants: Participants are clinically stable brain-injured patients (18–75 years old), requiring more than 48 hours of invasive mechanical ventilation with residual disorder of consciousness after sedation withdrawal, and who achieved a spontaneous breathing trial.

Interventions: The control condition consists of extubation based on usual care and local practice. The intervention condition consists of extubation triggered by a clinical score evaluating deglutition, gag reflex, cough and visual tracking (Coma Recovery Scale-Revised Visual Scale).

Objective: To determine whether adoption of an extubation protocol based on a clinical score can lessen extubation failure compared with usual care in brain-injured patients with residual disorder of consciousness.

Outcome: The primary outcome measure is extubation failure, defined within 5 days following extubation. The key secondary outcome measure is time to effective extubation.

Randomisation: Clusters are allocated to sequence of treatments using random blocks randomisation. The constitution of groups of clusters was stratified according to planned recruitment of each centre.

Blinding: Investigators and outcome assessors are not blinded to condition allocation.

Number of participants: 660 patients (220 in the control condition and 440 in the intervention condition).

The BIPER trial was approved by an independent ethics committee. The study began on 9 February 2020, and 571 participants are now included. Results will be published in an international peer-reviewed medical journal. 

NCT04080440.