Etrasimod is an oral, once-daily, selective sphingosine 1-phosphate_1,4,5 receptor modulator for the treatment of moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC). While etrasimod demonstrated efficacy in randomised controlled trials, understanding its effectiveness in an observational setting is crucial.

EFFECT-UC is a prospective, multinational, non-interventional study to evaluate the real-world effectiveness of etrasimod in adults with moderately to severely active UC. The study consists of a 52-week treatment period and a 28-day safety follow-up period and aims to enrol ~300 patients per cohort. Eligible patients (18–64 years) are advanced therapy naïve or experienced and are initiating etrasimod in a real-world clinical setting. Treatment will be guided independently by the clinician’s judgement. Patient-reported outcomes will be collected electronically throughout the study and daily for the first 2 weeks. Exploratory data, including faecal calprotectin, endoscopy and intestinal ultrasound, will be collected at predefined visits or during standard care. Primary endpoints are symptomatic remission at week 12 and week 52. Secondary endpoints include patient-reported outcome 2 (combined rectal bleeding and stool frequency subscores) response at week 12 and week 52 and corticosteroid-free symptomatic remission at week 52.

Ethics approval was obtained for all sites. Recruitment is underway for cohort 1, comprising patients from the UK, Germany and Canada. Interim results for this cohort are expected in 2026 and final results in 2028; these will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals and presented at appropriate congresses.

NCT06294925.

There is an urgent need to better understand how information from circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) can be integrated into routine care for patients with advanced solid cancer.

The implementation of liquid biopsies in routine care of patients with advanced solid cancer trial (LIQPLAT) is a single-centre, single-arm trial investigating the implementation of ctDNA in the routine care of patients with advanced solid cancer. We present a mixed-methods process evaluation embedded in the LIQPLAT trial, following Medical Research Council guidance and the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance framework. We show a logic model, which details the causal chain and related assumptions from recruiting patients into the trial to the goal of improving quality of life and survival. Data collection is longitudinal and includes: semistructured interviews with healthcare professionals (pathologists, biologists, oncologists; planned n=20) and patients (planned n=15) to identify implementation barriers and facilitators; recordings of molecular tumour board meetings to analyse clinical decision-making; the 23-item Normalisation MeAsure Development survey for healthcare professionals (planned n=20) at four time points. Quantitative data from hospital records will be used to assess implementation outcomes like patient acceptance rates and ctDNA workflow success. Qualitative data will undergo thematic and content analysis, and quantitative data will be analysed using a Bayesian framework.

The LIQPLAT trial was approved by the regional ethics committee of Northwestern and Central Switzerland (BASEC 2024-00358). The qualitative aspects of the process evaluation were exempted from ethics review according to the Swiss Human Research Act. We follow guidelines for data security, confidentiality and information governance. Results will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals and discussed at conferences.

NCT06367751, SNCTP000005844.

Structured Early detection of Asymptomatic Liver fibrosis and cirrhosis (SEAL) is a population-based screening programme using non-invasive tests for the early detection of liver fibrosis. This study evaluates the cost implications if the SEAL programme were to be implemented in routine care in Germany.

This study models cost differences with and without the SEAL screening programme. We regress costs of care on patient characteristics (age, comorbidities, sex, liver diseases, liver cancer and liver fibrosis and cirrhosis (LCI) stage) using statutory health insurance (SHI) data from routine care patients with LCI (n=4177). Based on these results, we predict per-patient costs for the patients newly diagnosed with LCI by SEAL (n=45). Costs with and without screening are estimated using patient age and LCI stage distributions from either SEAL or routine care.

SEAL was conducted in two German states. Initial screening was performed by patients’ primary care physicians.

Individuals insured by SHI without a prior diagnosis of LCI, eligible for Check-up 35, a general health check-up programme primarily targeting adults aged 35 and older, conducted by primary care physicians.

Screening via aspartate aminotransferase to platelet ratio index in primary care, for further evaluation serological diagnostics and ultrasound examinations in secondary care and specific assessment for definite diagnosis including transient elastography and liver biopsy for selected cases in tertiary care.

Primary outcome measures: expected 5-year cost changes for SEAL patients diagnosed with fibrosis or cirrhosis compared to costs without a screening programme. Secondary outcome measures: case mix of leading chronic liver disease and LCI stages among patients diagnosed with advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis in SEAL versus routine care without screening.

Screening leads to fewer decompensated cases at initial diagnosis (4.6% in SEAL vs 22.8% in routine care) and thus savings in the costs of care within the first years of diagnosis: total expected costs per case were 2175 lower (bias-corrected bootstrap CIs (BCI): 527 to 3734), and LCI-associated costs were reduced by 1218 (BCI: 296 to 2164). Comparing the savings to the additional costs of diagnosis (range: 1575–1726 per detected LCI case) reveals that average changes in costs with screening range from moderate savings to moderate extra costs.

SEAL liver screening identifies patients in less advanced stages of LCI. If only costs were considered that are directly attributable to LCI, savings within 5 years are unlikely to fully outweigh the costs of screening. However, since this approach might miss additional LCI-related costs, SEAL appears to be cost-neutral compared with routine care when considering total healthcare costs.

The SEAL registration number is DRKS00013460. This study relates to its results.

Risk perception is a key influencing factor on the adoption of preventative health behaviours. This study aimed to understand the role of health communication on how people perceived the risk of COVID-19 and influenced relevant health behaviours to minimise disease susceptibility during the COVID-19 pandemic among people with a chronic disease.

This qualitative study involved a semi-structured interview of participants diagnosed with a chronic disease. In analysing interview responses, the Health Belief Model was utilised as a sensitising framework to facilitate analysis and explore themes within the domains of the model.

Interviews were completed between August and December 2020 through online platforms with individual participants.

Participants were Australian residents aged ≥18 years with self-reported chronic disease(s). Ninety interviews were completed, and a sample of 33 participants were enrolled for analysis.

Two main themes were identified: cues to action and perception of the threat of infection. Many participants had implemented external cues to preventative behaviours, including, but not limited to, social distancing, hand hygiene and, in some cases, mask use, mirroring enforced government restrictions. Individuals also had several social motivators from family, particularly those working in the health field, and the wider community to employ the enforced preventative behaviours. However, despite having a chronic disease, many participants did not recognise themselves as being susceptible to COVID-19. Rather, they were more concerned for others that they characterised as being at high risk, including the elderly. Geographical location also played a role in risk prevention behaviour; owing to low case numbers in rural and remote areas, the risk of susceptibility was not perceived to be high.

These findings demonstrate the need to clearly communicate the risk of infection to allow individuals to make informed decisions on preventative behaviours. This has ongoing relevance to future emergencies, including future pandemics/epidemics, and highlights the greater challenge if similar public health measures are contemplated again.

The efficacy and safety of SMS text message-delivered interventions for providing pain self-management education and improving clinical pain outcomes have been demonstrated in several randomised controlled trials. However, little is known about the feasibility and effectiveness of these interventions within Australian hospital settings. The current protocol describes a trial designed to evaluate the effectiveness and implementation of an SMS text message-delivered intervention designed to support patients’ engagement with pain self-management strategies and improve clinical pain outcomes after total knee replacement surgery.

A hybrid, type 1 effectiveness-implementation trial will be conducted at a private hospital in Australia. Participants (n=130) will be randomised to either the intervention group (receiving a pain self-management educational video prior to surgery, plus daily SMS text message reminders for 3 weeks after surgery) or an active control group (receiving the pre-surgery video alone, without text message reminders) in addition to usual care. Effectiveness outcomes will be pain intensity (primary), opioid dose, knee function and pain-related distress and will be recorded at baseline, 3 days, 3 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months after surgery using self-reported surveys. Pain self-efficacy and health-related quality of life will be measured at 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months post-surgery. Implementation outcomes (Reach, Experience, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance) will be evaluated using mixed (qualitative and quantitative) methods. This trial represents a first step towards the translation of digitally delivered postoperative support for engaging with pain self-management in the Australian healthcare system.

The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the Austin Health Human Ethics Research Committee (Australia, HREC/110142/Austin-2024). Study results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at scientific and professional meetings.

ACTRN12624001060538

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic, relapsing, heterogeneous skin disease affecting 2%–7% of adults, with roughly 30% having moderate-to-severe disease. AD symptoms, like intense itching and skin pain, carry a substantial disease burden that negatively impacts patients’ quality of life (QoL) and psychosocial well-being. Lebrikizumab is a novel, high-affinity monoclonal antibody that selectively binds to and neutralises interleukin-13 with high potency. Three clinical trials with lebrikizumab (ADvocate 1 and 2; ADhere) demonstrated significant clinical benefit in patients with AD, while the 3-year long-term extension study of lebrikizumab (ADjoin) further demonstrated long-term efficacy and safety in patients with AD. The ADTrust study will evaluate patient well-being, their relationship with their skin, long-term effectiveness, and safety of lebrikizumab, treatment satisfaction, and long-term effect of lebrikizumab treatment on different aspects of patients’ lives, including itch, pain, sleep, fatigue, work impairment and overall QoL among adult patients with moderate-to-severe AD in a real-world setting.

This non-interventional, prospective, observational, real-world evidence study will involve approximately 150 sites across Europe and approximately 1200 adults with moderate-to-severe AD treated with lebrikizumab for 2 years. The primary endpoint is patient well-being assessed by the 5-item WHO Well-Being Index (WHO-5) questionnaire. Key secondary endpoints include clinical effectiveness (Eczema Area and Severity Index and Investigator’s Global Assessment Scale), disease symptomatology and control (Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure, 24-hour peak pruritus, skin pain, fatigue and sleep quality Numerical Rating Scale, and safety and tolerability. Other validated endpoints will evaluate physician-reported and patient-reported QoL and treatment satisfaction (Dermatology Life Quality Index, Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire-9), patients’ work productivity and impairment (Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI)-AD) and disease control (AD Control Tool). Novel experimental endpoints will also be evaluated with the aim to assess patients’ relationship with their skin (SkinLove questionnaire), disease control (intensity and frequency of flares) and an Effectiveness Diary^+© (a brief monthly survey on a voluntary basis with the aim to assess the long-term impact of lebrikizumab on three fundamental aspects of the patients’ life: the well-being (WHO-5), the itch intensity (24 hours peak pruritus) and the frequency and intensity of flares). Statistical analyses will be descriptive and explorative and based on observed cases. Missing data imputation may be used to handle missing data for primary endpoints and secondary effectiveness endpoints.

This study will be conducted according to the protocol, which has ethics committee approval (Hamburg Ethic Committee in Germany: 2024-101358-BO-ff), and all applicable laws and regulatory requirements for each participating country. The results will be disseminated through scientific publications and congress presentations.

NCT06815380 (Pre-results).