Self-care plays a pivotal role in the management of heart failure (HF). Health literacy and empowerment are considered the prerequisites of effective self-care. This project aims to improve self-management in people with HF by describing, analysing and enhancing the communication practices of clinicians and patients to support people with HF to increase their health literacy skills and participate in shared decision-making.

A multimethod research design incorporating an interview component, a concurrent mixed-methods component and a pilot intervention study is used. The study is currently being conducted at two Australian hospitals in metropolitan areas (one public and one private). The interview component involves semistructured interviews with healthcare providers and hospital executives and managers at the participating sites to explore perceived barriers and facilitators to HF self-management and understand the institutional context of HF care. The concurrent mixed-methods components include: (a) tracking and audio recording the clinical interactions of patients with HF (n=30) during their hospitalisation and up to 6 months after discharge and semistructured interviews with the patient (and the carer) and the participating clinician after each clinical interaction and (b) collecting longitudinal survey data (n=180, patients) to track patients’ health literacy, empowerment and self-management over 6 months. The pilot feasibility study includes developing a complex intervention for clinicians and patients and evaluating its acceptability and potential in improving health literacy and reducing readmissions, length of stay and costs.

This study was approved by the Australian Capital Territory Health (2023.ETH.00007) and Edith Cowan University (023–04314-SAUNDERS) Human Research Ethics Committees. Informed consent was obtained and will continue to be sought from all participants. Study results will be disseminated in peer-reviewed journals.

There is a pressing need for effective interventions that can support healthcare workers and caregivers in the challenging yet crucial task of disclosing the HIV status to infected children and adolescents. Previously, we developed and tested a successful disclosure intervention called Sankofa in Ghana. In an ongoing 5-year follow-up study, Sankofa 2, we aim to build on the successful Sankofa trial by testing the intervention on a larger scale.

This study is a pragmatic, stepped-wedge cluster randomised trial.

It is being conducted in 12 HIV paediatric clinics in Ghana to examine the effectiveness, health benefits, cost and implementation of the Sankofa intervention. Caregiver–child dyads (n=700) will be enrolled. Evaluation of effectiveness, health benefits, cost and implementation of the Paediatric HIV disclosure intervention, Sankofa 2, is posed to offer valuable insights for scale-up and sustainability.

Ethical clearance has been obtained from the Ghana Health Service Ethics Review Committee, the University of Ghana Ethical and Protocol Review Committee, the Committee on Human Research Publication and Ethics of the Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, the Johns Hopkins Medicine Institutional Review Board and the Yale School of Medicine Human Investigation Committee. The clinical trial was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov on 5 March 2021. All caregiver participants are required to provide written informed consent and the children assent before enrolment. If either the child or caregiver says no to the study, the dyad is not eligible for the study. No study-related procedures are performed until consent is obtained. The results of the trial will be added on ClinicalTrials.gov, published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at international conferences.

NCT04791865.

Public involvement in mental health research enhances research quality. The use of citizen science methods in mental health research has been described as a conclusion of a movement towards increased public involvement; however, this field is in its early stages of development. Our objective was to create a theory of change (ToC) for how citizen science can be used to enhance mental health research quality.

Iterative consultation with the stakeholders of an existing citizen mental health science study, that is, change for citizen science to achieve co-production at scale (C-STACS: https://www.researchintorecovery.com/research/c-stacs/)

We co-developed a ToC through an iterative consultation with C-STACS stakeholders who were (a) representatives of mental health community organisations (n=10), individuals with public involvement experience (n=2) and researchers (n=5). In keeping with established ToC practice, entities were identified, including long-term impacts, outcomes needed to create an impact, stakeholder assumptions and indicators for tracking progress.

A desired primary long-term impact of greater co-production of research was identified between researchers and members of the public, which would create a secondary impact of enhancing public capacity to engage in citizen mental health science. We proposed long-term outcomes needed to enable this impact: (1) greater co-production of research objectives and pathways between researcher and the public, (2) greater embedment of citizen mental health science into funder processes (eg, the creation of specific funding calls for citizen mental health science proposals, (3) greater clarity on the boundaries between citizen science and other participatory approaches (eg, so that there is not loss of impact due to conceptual confusion between these, (4) increased knowledge around effective frameworks to enable mass public participation and (5) greater availability of technology platforms, enabling safe and accessible engagement with citizen mental health science projects.

The proposed ToC is grounded in the C-STACS project, but intended to be broadly applicable. It allows the continued formation of a community of practice around citizen mental health science and should be reviewed, as greater knowledge is developed on how citizen mental health science creates change.

Current treatments for alcohol use disorders (AUD) have limited efficacy. A previous 28-day pilot trial of N-acetyl cysteine (NAC) vs placebo found NAC to be feasible and safe, with evidence of improvement on some measures of alcohol consumption. Thus, the primary aim of the NAC-AUD study is to examine the therapeutic and cost-effectiveness of NAC vs placebo in improving treatment outcomes for AUD. We will also examine the (i) effect of NAC vs placebo on mood, markers of liver injury, cognition and hangover symptoms; and (ii) predictors of any response.

This double-blind trial will randomise participants with AUD to a 12-week regimen of either NAC (2400 mg/day) or placebo. All participants will receive medical management. The primary drinking outcome will be the number of heavy drinking days (HDDs) per week, validated by phosphatidylethanol (PEth). Secondary alcohol-related outcomes will include standard drinks per drinking day (SDDD) per week and absence of any HDDs. Other secondary outcomes will include markers of liver injury, depression, anxiety, craving, hangover symptoms, cognition and blood oxidative stress markers. We will also examine the cost-efficacy of NAC vs placebo.

Ethics approval for the study has been granted by The Sydney Local Health District Ethics Review Committee (X21-0342& HREC2021/ETH11614). There are no restrictions on publication from the sponsor or other parties.

NCT05408247.