by Tadgh Connery, Sofija Kukulite, Conor Farrell, Rosa Horgan, Karen Barry, Megan Doyle, Annalisa Setti, Mike Murphy
BackgroundDeath anxiety is fast becoming recognised as a transdiagnostic construct across myriad mental health conditions. Though existing clinical treatments of death anxiety, such as Cognitive Behaviour Therapy type interventions, have been shown to be effective, Terror Management Theory (TMT) proposes self-esteem as a protective factor against death anxiety by endowing individuals with a feeling of significance in life and helping them to process the nature of death and its inevitability. Despite the centrality of self-esteem to TMT, however, extant research examining its relationship with death anxiety has yet to be synthesised. The current study aims to systematically review peer-reviewed, quantitative research examining the association between death anxiety and self-esteem and, where possible, to test the strength of these associations through meta-analysis.
MethodA systematic search of quantitative and mixed-methods studies will be conducted across six databases: MEDLINE; PsycINFO; PubMed; Web of Science; CINAHL and; EMBASE. Google Scholar will also be searched and the first 200 records by relevance will be screened for eligibility. Searches will be conducted by TC, and records will be screened by TC, SK, CF, RH and KB, so that each record is screened for eligibility by at least two authors. Data extraction and quality assessment, using the Joanna Briggs Inventory Risk of Bias tools, will be performed by TC, SK, CF, RH and KB, so that each record is assessed by at least two authors, with doubts and discrepancies being resolved through discussion with AS and MM. A narrative synthesis of relevant data will be presented and, where sufficient data are available, meta-analysis will be conducted using the MAJOR extension for Jamovi to establish an overall effect size for the association between death anxiety and self-esteem. Should sufficient data be available, demographic factors, such as gender and age, and clinical population status (clinical vs. non-clinical population) will be examined as moderators of the effect. This protocol was developed in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and has been registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024591775).
DiscussionThe current review will systematically examine the relationship between death anxiety and self-esteem. Should sufficient data be available, an overall effect size of the relationship will be generated. By better understanding how death anxiety is related to self-esteem, and by establishing the size and significance of the relationship will aid firstly in systematically validating TMT and, secondly, identify whether self-esteem may be targeted in future death anxiety interventions to reduce death anxiety and improve individuals’ overall mental health.
To develop an updated core dataset for acute stroke care in Ireland, informed by international audit benchmarking and national stakeholder consensus, for integration into the Irish National Audit of Stroke (INAS).
Scoping review and three-round Delphi process.
Medline Ovid, Embase, CINAHL EBSCOhost, Google Scholar, audit websites and grey literature (2010–2024). Additional audit documentation was obtained via direct author contact.
National stroke audits or registries with a country-wide scope, ≥1 year of continuous data collection and active in 2021 were eligible. Only audits covering acute stroke care were included in this study phase. All records were screened for inclusion.
Audit documentation (data dictionaries, item definitions and contextual metadata) was retrieved from eligible audits. Acute stroke care items were extracted, charted and benchmarked against existing INAS items and each other to identify commonalities and gaps. Frequently collected international items (appearing in ≥4 audits/registries) were shortlisted. A three-round Delphi process with 24 national stakeholders (clinicians, nurses, allied health professionals, researchers, policymakers and patient representatives) was conducted to audit and refine the dataset through structured, anonymised item rating, iterative feedback and consensus-building discussions.
Twenty-one eligible international stroke audits/registries were identified, yielding ~4500 audit items. Benchmarking against existing INAS items (n=103), frequently collected international items (n=97) and expert-suggested items (n=22) informed the Delphi consultation. The final dataset expanded INAS by 18 items, totalling 86 acute care and 35 thrombectomy-specific items. New additions included stroke-related complications and risk factor documentation.
This structured, consensus-led process resulted in an internationally benchmarked, stakeholder-informed core dataset to enhance standardised stroke auditing in Ireland. The expanded dataset supports enhanced clinical monitoring, quality improvement and health system planning. This approach may inform audit development and research efforts in other contexts.