FreshRSS

🔒
❌ Acerca de FreshRSS
Hay nuevos artículos disponibles. Pincha para refrescar la página.
AnteayerTus fuentes RSS

Effect of nasogastric versus orogastric tube placement on ventilator-associated pneumonia incidence in critically ill patients: a study protocol for a cluster randomised crossover trial in 16 intensive care units in France (SONG trial)

Por: Saletes · J. · Guitton · C. · Valleroy · J. · Guillarme · S. · Haubertin · C. · Paris · G. · Muller · L. · Rousseau · C. · Gamon · P. · LHotellier · S. · Forel · J.-M. · Roussel · C. · Garin · A. · Morand · C. · Maury · E. · Mangeard · N. · Menard · L. · Arnaud · P.-Y. · Lejeune · A. · Rouan
Introduction

Patients in intensive care units (ICUs) frequently require mechanical ventilation, with approximately half needing invasive ventilation through an orotracheal tube. For these patients, gastric tube (GT) insertion is routinely performed to administer nutrition and medications or to drain gastric contents. The insertion route (oral or nasal) may affect the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), a significant ICU care complication. This study aims to compare the impact of oral versus nasal GT insertion on the incidence of VAP in intubated ICU patients.

Methods and analysis

The SONG trial (NCT 05915663) is a multicentre, open-label, two-period, two-intervention, cluster randomised crossover superiority trial. 16 French ICUs will participate. ICUs will be randomised to periods of nasogastric or orogastric tube placement. The trial includes a practice standardisation period, followed by two 12-month inclusion periods separated by a monitoring and washout period. The primary endpoint is the incidence rate of VAP at day 28, confirmed by three independent physicians. Secondary endpoints include the ease of GT insertion, measured by the number of attempts.

Ethics and dissemination

This study received approval from a central ethical review board on 12 April 2024 (CPP Sud-est VI, registration number 23.00943.000175). Patients are included after informed consent or, when not possible, from next of kin. If none are available, the investigator will proceed with emergency inclusion, following French law. When consent is initially obtained from the next of kin or through emergency inclusion, the investigator will seek consent from the patient as soon as possible. Data will be anonymised and patient confidentiality maintained. Results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at scientific meetings.

Trial registration number

NCT05915663.

OptiNeoCare: optimisation of routine care in the management of severe perinatal asphyxia in full-term or near-term newborns - study protocol for analysis of suboptimal care by confidential inquiries and e-self report

Por: Guellec · I. · Ancel · P.-Y. · Abdoul · H. · Garabedian · C. · Verspyck · E. · Huissoud · C. · Delnaud · M. · Graesslin · B. · Desplanches · T. · Cambonie · G. · Tourneux · P. · Debillon · T. · Mitha · A. · Loron · G. · Favrais · G. · Badr · M. · Chapeliere · S. · Brasseur-Daudruy · M. · G
Introduction

Severe perinatal asphyxia at term or near term remains a critical public health issue, associated with high risks of neonatal death and hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy (HIE). Despite improved clinical guidelines, suboptimal care persists in many cases, and previous audits have demonstrated that up to 50% of asphyxia cases could be associated with suboptimal care. OptiNeoCare is a French study which aims to assess the prevalence and determinants of suboptimal obstetric and neonatal care and evaluate its potential impact on neonatal outcomes.

Materials and methods

This prospective, population-based observational study will include newborns ≥36 weeks’ gestation with severe perinatal asphyxia across 12 French perinatal networks (213 maternity units). Inclusion criteria comprise neonatal death or moderate/severe HIE with confirmed biochemical markers of asphyxia. Data will be collected prospectively from labour wards, transport teams and neonatal intensive care units using an electronic case report form, and the in-situ team will be invited to complete a morbi-mortality review (MMR). Approximately 336 cases will be included over 12 months, with 25% randomly selected for confidential enquiry by two experts. The quality of care will be assessed based on a structured classification of medical errors (diagnostic, therapeutic, preventive and systemic) by a panel of experts including an obstetrician or midwife and a paediatrician. Root cause analysis will identify determinants of suboptimal care. A concordance analysis will compare findings from MMRs and confidential enquiries. Statistical analysis will include multivariable logistic regression to explore associations between care quality and neonatal outcomes.

Ethics and dissemination

Ethical approval was granted by the Ethics Committee for Research in Obstetrics and Gynaecology. Informed non-opposition is required from participants. Results will be shared with participating centres, healthcare professionals and through scientific dissemination.

Trial registration number

ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT06322732.

❌