To assess the acceptability and adoption of multiparameter point-of-care testing (POCT) devices for the diagnosis and management of non-communicable diseases (NCDs) at the primary healthcare level in a resource-limited region of Peru.

Qualitative case-control process evaluation.

Eight primary healthcare facilities in northern Peru, including both urban and rural centres, where routine chronic care and laboratory services are provided.

Sixty-three participants: 36 patients, 12 laboratory technicians, 10 healthcare professionals and five facility heads. Eligible patients were ≥18 years, residing in the catchment area, with or without prior NCD diagnoses. Healthcare workers, including physicians, nurses, laboratory staff and facility managers.

Multiparameter POCT devices were installed in four intervention facilities, accompanied by staff training and community awareness activities, while four control facilities continued with conventional laboratory diagnostics.

Primary outcome: perceptions of patients and healthcare workers regarding the acceptability and adoption of POCT devices. Secondary outcomes: identification of facilitators and barriers to implementation, including infrastructure, supply chains and training gaps.

(1) Individuals: POCT was valued for speed and comfort, but concerns over accuracy were mentioned. (2) Intervention characteristics: laboratory staff valued POCT’s practicality in emergencies, but noted limitations in handling multiple samples. (3) Outer setting: urban centres outperformed rural facilities, with more staff and longer operating hours. (4) Inner setting: calibration gaps impacted POCT and conventional test reliability, requiring quality control and training. (5) Process: clear staff communication boosted patient confidence in POCT, but inconsistent training could lead to reliability doubts.

Multiparameter POCT devices show promise for enhancing NCD care in resource-limited primary healthcare settings, particularly in rural areas. However, their sustainability depends on broader health system reforms, including reliable supply chains, expanded training and stronger quality assurance mechanisms. Further research should examine strategies for embedding POCT within national regulatory and policy frameworks.

The 2012 Kidney Diseases Improving Global Outcomes clinical practice guideline recommends prescribing continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) doses in patients with acute kidney injury (AKI) between 20 and 25 mL/kg/hour, with a need to consider further augmentation to 25–30 mL/kg/hour. Observational data have shown that lower-dose CRRT (

Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, CINAHL and Cochrane Library will be searched for studies from inception to present. We will evaluate the risk of bias using the modified Cochrane tool for randomised controlled trials and the Cochrane Risk of Bias In Non-randomised Studies—of Interventions tool for cohort studies. Two reviewers will independently complete study selection, data extraction and bias assessment. Inclusion criteria will be randomised controlled trials and observational studies (cohort) including patients with AKI receiving CRRT. The exposure will be lower dose-intensity CRRT (

Ethics approval is not required as primary data will not be collected. Findings of this review will be disseminated through peer-related publication.

CRD420251135606.

Mothers’ mental health and life satisfaction may have been negatively affected due to challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic. Given the risk of future crises, knowledge of possible mitigating factors in this population is essential. This study aims to examine whether the pandemic affected the level of protective factors such as social support, physical activity and employment situation, and how these factors are associated with mental distress and life satisfaction.

Longitudinal cohort study.

Primary outcomes were mental distress (measured by the eight-item version of the Hopkins Symptom Checklist) and life satisfaction (measured by the Satisfaction With Life Scale). As the first step, we investigated changes in the levels of social support (defined by the number and frequency of social contact), physical activity (average hours of physical activity during a week), employment situation (actively working vs sick leave or unemployed), alcohol consumption (measured by the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test-Consumption) and relationship satisfaction (measured by the five-item version of the Relationship Satisfaction Scale).

We analysed data from two waves of the Norwegian Mother, Father and Child Cohort Study (n=~18 000 mothers); one pre-pandemic wave and one wave where half of the sample responded after the onset of the pandemic, with pandemic exposure being defined by questionnaire response timing rather than cohort recruitment. To assess changes in protective factors over time and pandemic exposure, we used difference-in-differences analyses and regression discontinuity design. Associations between protective factors with mental distress and life satisfaction, and possible moderation by pandemic exposure, were investigated using multiple regression models with interaction terms adjusted for potential confounders.

Apart from physical activity, which declined less across time in the pandemic group (B=0.09, 99% CI 0.05 to 0.12), protective factors did not change during the pandemic. Social support, employment situation and relationship satisfaction were associated with mental distress and life satisfaction, whereas physical activity showed a unique relationship with mental distress. Most associations were similar across pandemic exposure groups, except employment situation which appeared to have a stronger protective effect in the pandemic group (β=–0.12, 99% CI –0.24 to –0.00).

Changes over time in self-reported levels of protective factors were generally consistent among mothers independent of the pandemic. These factors appear to play an equally important role for mental distress and life satisfaction both under ordinary circumstances and during public health crises. Our findings enhance the understanding of how potential protective factors among mothers are associated with mental distress and life satisfaction in the context of a global stressor. Future studies should investigate additional mitigating factors that may be particularly relevant during global crises and explore the causal relationship between protective factors, mental health and life satisfaction.

Adults with intellectual and/or developmental disabilities (IDD) experience higher rates of age-related health concerns, including dementia, than adults without disabilities. Despite this, current efforts to support brain health in ageing have often excluded this population. To address this gap, we will codesign, codeliver and evaluate a national virtual brain health education programme, Brain Health-IDD, for ageing individuals with IDD, family caregivers and health and social care providers.

This study will evaluate the Brain Health-IDD Program, an interactive virtual psychoeducation course codesigned and coled by an interdisciplinary team of clinicians and people with lived experience. Three participant groups will be recruited from across Canada: adults with IDD, aged 40 years and older; family caregivers who have a family member with IDD aged 40 years and older or who are themselves aged 60 years and older; and health or social service providers who support adults with IDD aged 40 years and older. Outcomes will be measured at baseline, postcourse and 3-month follow-up. Data will be collected through structured surveys, including both closed and open-ended questions, and focus group interviews.

Primary outcomes are participation, satisfaction and changes in knowledge and self-efficacy related to brain health among the three participant groups. Secondary outcomes for both adults with IDD and family caregivers include changes in health-related behaviours (social connections, sleep hygiene and physical activity), physical health, mental wellbeing, resilience and whether cognitive screening is initiated for adults with IDD and for caregivers. For health and social service providers, secondary outcomes include changes in brain health promotion practices and whether cognitive screening for older adults with IDD is initiated.

Analysis of open-text survey responses and qualitative data from focus group interviews will explore the experiences of participants with the Brain Health-IDD Program.

Institutional ethics approval was obtained from the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health Research Ethics Board. Programme findings and resources will be shared with advocacy groups, disability agencies, family caregiver organisations, clinicians and policymakers in the fields of disability, health and ageing at the provincial, national and international levels.

Prostate cancer diagnosis and treatment planning depend on accurate histopathological assessment of needle biopsies, particularly through the Gleason scoring system. The inherently subjective nature of the grading creates variability between pathologists, potentially resulting in suboptimal patient management decisions. These reproducibility challenges extend beyond Gleason scoring to encompass other critical diagnostic and prognostic markers, including cancer volume quantification and detection of cribriform morphology patterns and perineural invasion. Artificial intelligence (AI) applications in digital pathology have emerged as promising solutions for enhancing diagnostic consistency and accuracy, with recent research demonstrating that automated systems can match expert-level performance in prostate biopsy evaluation. Nevertheless, comprehensive validation studies have revealed concerning limitations in model generalisability when deployed across different clinical environments and patient populations. Recent systematic reviews revealed widespread risk-of-bias limitations and insufficient external validation in AI diagnostic studies, highlighting critical needs for accumulated evidence supporting generalisability before clinical implementation. Rigorous external validation with preregistered protocols using independent datasets from diverse clinical settings remains essential to establish the reliability and safety of AI-assisted prostate pathology systems.

This study protocol establishes a framework for the retrospective external validation of an AI system developed for prostate biopsy assessment, to be conducted on the case-control samples of the National Prostate Cancer Register of Sweden, ProMort study (1998-2015). The primary aim is to evaluate the AI model’s diagnostic accuracy and Gleason grading performance using completely independent datasets separate from any model development or previously used validation cohorts. The diversity of the validation samples, spanning multiple geographic regions, temporal collection periods and reference standards, allows evaluation of model robustness across varied clinical contexts. Secondary aims encompass evaluating AI performance in cancer length estimation and detection of cribriform patterns and perineural invasion. This protocol delineates procedures for data collection, reference standard clarification and prespecified statistical analyses, ensuring comprehensive validation and reliable performance assessment. The study design conforms to established reporting guidelines Checklist for Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging (CLAIM) and Standards for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy Studies using Artificial Intelligence (STARD-AI), and recognised best practices for AI validation in medical imaging.

Data collection and usage were approved by the Swedish Regional Ethics Review Board and the Swedish Ethical Review Authority (permits 2012/1586-31/1, 2016/613-31/2, 2019-01395, 2019-05220). The study adheres to the Declaration of Helsinki principles, and findings will be made available in open access peer-reviewed publications.

Cancer-related cognitive impairment is frequently reported by patients with breast cancer after chemotherapy. These difficulties can hinder return to work. It is therefore particularly important to assess and manage these impairments, especially to facilitate employment. We propose the Cog-VR pilot study to assess patient adherence to a virtual reality (VR)-based cognitive rehabilitation programme to support employment.

This prospective interventional pilot study aims to assess adherence to a VR-based cognitive rehabilitation programme in patients with breast cancer (n=23) treated by chemotherapy reporting cognitive complaints following cancer and its treatments. The programme consists of six weekly individual sessions (1 hour/week), including cognitive training, psychoeducation and VR immersion (10–15 min). VR tasks train executive functions, attention, memory and processing speed. The primary endpoint is the programme adherence, defined as completing at least five out of six VR sessions, each lasting a minimum of 5 min. The main secondary endpoints are objective cognitive tests and patient-reported outcomes (subjective cognitive functioning (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy—Cognitive Scale), anxiety/depression (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) and fatigue (Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy—Fatigue)) assessed before and after the programme. Furthermore, cyber sickness (Simulator Sickness Questionnaire) at each session, VR usability (System Usability Scale—third session) and patient satisfaction to the programme will also be assessed.

The study was approved by the local ethics committee (French Ouest II personal protection committee no. ID RCB: 2023-A02163-42) on January 2024. It was validated by the review board of the participating center. An individual participant data-sharing statement is not planned. Written informed consent will be obtained from all patients before any study procedure. The results of this pilot study will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals and conference presentations.

NCT06267014.

Health literacy (HL) is essential for making informed health-related decisions, for example enabling parents to reduce their child’s allergy risk. Health literacy does not, however, rely solely on an individual’s capacities, but is strongly influenced by external factors. Midwives provide important health advice to families, particularly since their relationship is close during a time of significant transition. This offers them a unique opportunity to positively influence the HL of parents, which in turn may support the health and well-being of the whole family. The aim of this study is to develop and evaluate an intervention that can support midwives in providing allergy prevention advice in a way that is in line with the concept of HL.

In accordance with the recommendations of the Medical Research Council framework in the first phase of this study, we will survey midwives (target sample size=379) in Germany regarding their practices, the potential barriers they face and enabling factors in providing advice on early childhood allergy prevention in an HL-responsive way. The data will be subjected to descriptive statistical analysis. Two co-design workshops will then be conducted with various stakeholders in two regions (Rhineland-Palatinate and Saxony) of Germany. Following the protocol proposed by the Stanford Design Thinking School, we will use design thinking to collect ideas for the intervention. Based on these ideas and our previous qualitative and quantitative study, we will develop an intervention in collaboration with didactic experts. The intervention will be piloted in three groups (midwives=10–15, midwives working as practice supervisors=5–10, students of midwifery=10–20). For the process evaluation, we will use observation protocols of the intervention conduct and qualitative interviews. For the outcome evaluation, we will use a questionnaire and observations in simulation laboratories with students of midwifery.

This study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of Regensburg (ID 23-3441-101) and is in compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Participation in the study will only be possible after informed consent has been given. Our results will be presented at national and international conferences and published in scientific journals. Additionally, once it has been finalised, we will make the intervention available to educational institutions for (future) midwives.

Polysubstance use (PSU), particularly opioid-involved and stimulant-involved PSU, is a growing issue in the USA. PSU increases the risk of negative health consequences, including infectious diseases, worsening physical and mental health conditions, and overdose-related deaths. These consequences occur in the context of varying health risk behaviours, substance-related preferences, and treatment engagements among people with PSU. To inform improvements in prevention, harm reduction, and substance use disorder (SUD) treatment, additional research is needed to comprehensively understand the current context and drivers of PSU preferences, motivations, and behaviours.

Herein, we describe the protocol for a prospective cohort study designed to capture detailed patterns, profiles, and trajectories of PSU, with the aim of comprehensively examining the drivers of PSU behaviours and SUD treatment utilisation. Adults (ages 18–75; n=400) who engage in PSU will be recruited from healthcare institutions, an established participant database maintained by an adjacent SUD research team, and online advertisements. Study assessments will capture dynamic patterns, choice preferences, and motivators of PSU via behavioural economic (BE) measures, detailed Timeline Follow-Back (TLFB) interviews, and self-administered surveys. The assessment timeline will include a baseline survey and TLFB interview, weekly TLFB interviews for 4 weeks post-baseline, and follow-up surveys and TLFB interviews at 4-, 8-, and 12-months post-baseline.

The study is funded through the National Institutes of Health Helping to End Addiction Long-term (HEAL) initiative and was approved by the University of Michigan Medical Institutional Review Board. Findings will be disseminated to academic, clinical, and community partners through the Michigan Innovations in Addiction Care through Research and Education programme. Results from this study will inform actionable and practical insights relevant to the delivery of personalised care in the context of PSU.

Military personnel are a unique population with heightened vulnerability to sexually transmitted infections (STIs), often exhibiting higher prevalence rates than civilians due to demographic, environmental and occupational factors. These vulnerabilities underscore the need for global prevalence estimates to guide effective, evidence-based interventions. This study aims to quantify the global burden of STIs among military personnel, providing a comprehensive and up-to-date assessment.

This systematic review will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Guidelines (2020). Using the CoCoPop (Condition, Context, and Population) framework, a comprehensive search strategy will be conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, Global Health and Scopus to retrieve peer-reviewed records published between January 2010 and June 2025. Eligible studies will report numerical STI prevalence data among military personnel. Studies with insufficient information to calculate prevalence or those relying on self-reported STI data will be excluded. Data extraction will include study details, military descriptors, STI prevalence and diagnostic methods. Risk of bias will be assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical assessment tool for prevalence and incidence studies. Prevalence estimates with 95% CIs will be reported for each STI and, where appropriate, pooled for curable STIs. Subgroup analyses will stratify prevalence by geographic region, service status, deployment status and socioeconomic factors. Heterogeneity will be evaluated within predefined subgroups using the I² statistic. Data will be presented in comprehensive tables and visualised with graphical tools, including forest plots for subgroup analyses and pooled estimates.

Ethical approval is not required for this review. The results will be disseminated through a peer-reviewed publication and conference presentations.

CRD42023472113.