Conectar
To explore the key advice healthcare professionals would give colleagues regarding end-of-life care delivery in hospitals, thereby informing training needs.
Exploratory qualitative study.
Free-text responses from medical, nursing, and allied health professionals who completed online end-of-life care education modules (n = 597) from August 2022 to September 2023 were analysed using inductive content analysis. Results were explored and separated into two key findings: themes that were shared by all professional groups and themes that were profession specific.
Five themes were consistent across all three professional groups: prioritise patient comfort, proactive communication, collaboration and inclusion, human approach and support and wellbeing, each with their own subthemes. Several profession specific subthemes were also identified.
The identification of common themes across healthcare professions helps to support the development of interprofessional training initiatives.
This research contributes valuable insights for developing targeted end-of-life care education programs. Results also underscore the potential of online learning platforms in providing accessible, evidence-based, continuing professional development in end-of-life care.
In Australia, most deaths occur in acute hospital settings. To inform and shape future training, this study collected the key advice healthcare professionals would give colleagues regarding end-of-life care delivery. The themes generated covered a range of potential training topics shared across all professionals, including prioritise patient comfort, proactive communication, collaboration and inclusion, human approach and support and wellbeing. Several profession-specific subthemes were also identified, providing additional insights for designing training for professional groups. Results underscore the potential of online learning platforms in providing accessible, evidence-based, continuing professional development in end-of-life care.
Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (SRQR).
None.
Adults with intellectual and/or developmental disabilities (IDD) experience higher rates of age-related health concerns, including dementia, than adults without disabilities. Despite this, current efforts to support brain health in ageing have often excluded this population. To address this gap, we will codesign, codeliver and evaluate a national virtual brain health education programme, Brain Health-IDD, for ageing individuals with IDD, family caregivers and health and social care providers.
This study will evaluate the Brain Health-IDD Program, an interactive virtual psychoeducation course codesigned and coled by an interdisciplinary team of clinicians and people with lived experience. Three participant groups will be recruited from across Canada: adults with IDD, aged 40 years and older; family caregivers who have a family member with IDD aged 40 years and older or who are themselves aged 60 years and older; and health or social service providers who support adults with IDD aged 40 years and older. Outcomes will be measured at baseline, postcourse and 3-month follow-up. Data will be collected through structured surveys, including both closed and open-ended questions, and focus group interviews.
Primary outcomes are participation, satisfaction and changes in knowledge and self-efficacy related to brain health among the three participant groups. Secondary outcomes for both adults with IDD and family caregivers include changes in health-related behaviours (social connections, sleep hygiene and physical activity), physical health, mental wellbeing, resilience and whether cognitive screening is initiated for adults with IDD and for caregivers. For health and social service providers, secondary outcomes include changes in brain health promotion practices and whether cognitive screening for older adults with IDD is initiated.
Analysis of open-text survey responses and qualitative data from focus group interviews will explore the experiences of participants with the Brain Health-IDD Program.
Institutional ethics approval was obtained from the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health Research Ethics Board. Programme findings and resources will be shared with advocacy groups, disability agencies, family caregiver organisations, clinicians and policymakers in the fields of disability, health and ageing at the provincial, national and international levels.
by Thomas C. Scheier, Richard Whitlock, Mark Loeb, Philip James Devereaux, Andre Lamy, Michael McGillion, MacKenzie Quantz, Ingrid Copland, Shun-Fu Lee, Dominik Mertz
Sternal surgical site infections after cardiac surgery can lead to significant morbidity, mortality, and cost. The effects of negative pressure wound management and adding vancomycin as perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis are unknown. The PICS-PREVENA pilot/vanguard trial, a 2x2 factorial, open label, cluster-randomized crossover trial with 4 periods, was conducted at two major cardiac surgery hospitals in Ontario, Canada. Sites were randomized to one of eight sequences of the four study arms (Cefazolin or Cefazolin + Vancomycin (not analyzed) and standard wound dressing or a negative pressure 3M Prevena incision management system (Prevena). Only diabetic or obese patients were eligible for the latter comparison. This trial investigated feasability including adherence to protocol of each intervention (goal: > 90% each) and loss to follow-up (goal:
FreshRSS 