Conectar
Evidence-based practice (EBP) has been in existence for more than 30 years and is recognized as the standard to achieve high quality care.
To examine EBP beliefs, competence, implementation self-efficacy, organizational culture and readiness, access to mentors and assess relationships between nurse characteristics and EBP variables in a large healthcare system in six U.S. states.
A cross-sectional descriptive correlational design was used to conduct a web-based anonymous survey of registered nurses in a large multistate healthcare system throughout the western US. Measures included: EBP Competency Self-Assessment Scale, the EBP Mentoring Scale, and the Short forms of the EBP Beliefs Scale, EBP Implementation Scale, the Organizational Culture and Readiness Scale for System-Wide Integration of Evidence-Based Practice.
A total of 1468 nurses completed the survey from 36 hospitals in six U.S. states. Overall, participants rated themselves competent in only one competency (asks clinical questions). EBP beliefs followed by implementation self-efficacy scores were highest. Total scores for EBP implementation showed the strongest positive correlation with EBP competency followed by beliefs and mentorship with culture and readiness, the least strong relationship. EBP competency, beliefs, and implementation increased with educational attainment. EBP mentorship scores were low across the system.
The study continues to demonstrate nurses' low perceptions of their EBP competency. Compared to previous studies, nurses in this sample reported their EBP competency higher; however, they still rated themselves above competence in only one statement. This underscores an urgent need for comprehensive education and robust support mechanisms. It is imperative that healthcare organizations establish access to experienced mentors and cultivate organizational structures to empower nurses to master EBP, thereby enhancing patient outcomes and advancing overall quality of care.
PRELUCA is a randomised, intervention, non-inferiority study designed to use real-time, longitudinal circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) measurements to evaluate the efficacy of immunotherapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The primary outcome is overall survival between the two groups: the standard of care group (computer tomography scan evaluation) and intervention group (ctDNA evaluation).
The inclusion and exclusion criteria align with European Society for Medical Oncology treatment guidelines and permit broad inclusion of NSCLC patients, ensuring ‘real-world’ representativeness. The study uses a tumour-informed method, using baseline next generation sequencing analyses to design patient-specific droplet digital PCR assays, which are run with collected blood samples 1 week prior to the intended treatment, enabling real-time evaluation via ctDNA Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours.
Inclusion began in July 2023 and patients are now being actively included in five locations across Denmark. Approval by The Committee on Health Research Ethics of Region Zealand was gained on 4 May 2023.
The purpose of this scoping review is to map and summarise the current peer-reviewed literature on inequities in doctoral nursing education, with a specific focus on populations affected, barriers, facilitators and strategies to support equity in doctoral nursing education.
This scoping review was guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR).
A comprehensive search for empirical evidence was completed using four databases: CINAHL, Scopus, ERIC and Google Scholar. A systematic screening process was applied, and data were extracted and charted guided by the Population, Concept, Context (PCC) framework.
Databases were searched for peer-reviewed articles published between 2000 and 2025.
A total of 13 studies met the inclusion criteria. Most studies focused on racial/ethnic minoritized populations, and one focused on first-generation doctoral students. Common barriers included experiences of microaggression, systemic racism, lack of funding and feelings of isolation. Common facilitators were faculty mentorship, financial support, peer networks and targeted recruitment programs.
Inequities remain in doctoral nursing education, particularly for racial/ethnic minoritized populations. Although some effective interventions were identified, significant gaps exist in understanding how to support diverse doctoral nursing students, especially for those with intersecting identities.
Addressing inequities in doctoral nursing education can enhance the diversity of the nursing workforce and faculty, promote inclusive academic environments and contribute to health equity.
Persistent inequities in access and experience among underrepresented groups in doctoral nursing education. Main findings: Key structural and social barriers persist, though several promising strategies have emerged. Impact area: Academic institutions, doctoral program designers and nurse leaders.
This study adheres to the PRISMA-ScR reporting guidelines. This study did not involve patients or the public in its design, conduct or reporting.
This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of delivering a vocational rehabilitation intervention (Return to Work After Trauma—ROWTATE), remotely to individuals recovering from traumatic injuries. The primary objectives were to assess therapists’ training and competence, adapt the intervention and training for remote delivery and assess the feasibility and fidelity of remote delivery to inform a definitive randomised controlled trial.
A mixed-methods feasibility study incorporating (1) telerehabilitation qualitative literature review, (2) qualitative interviews preintervention and postintervention with therapists and patients, (3) a team objective structured clinical examination to assess competency, (4) usefulness of training, attitudes towards (15-item Evidence-Based Practice Attitude Scale) and confidence in (4-item Evidence Based Practice Confidence Scale) evidence-based practice, intervention delivery confidence (8-bespoke questions) and intervention behaviour determinants (51-items Theoretical Domains Framework) and (5) single-arm intervention delivery feasibility study.
The study was conducted in two UK Major Trauma Centres. The intervention and training were adapted for remote delivery due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Therapists: Seven occupational therapists (OTs) and clinical psychologists (CPs) were trained, and six participated in competency assessment. Seven OTs and CPs participated in preintervention interviews and surveys; six completed post-intervention interviews and four completed post-training surveys. Patients: 10 patients were enrolled in the single-arm feasibility study and 4 of these participated in postintervention qualitative interviews. Inclusion criteria included therapists involved in vocational rehabilitation delivery and patients admitted to major trauma centres. Exclusion criteria included participation in other vocational rehabilitation trials or those who had returned to work or education for at least 80% of preinjury hours. Intervention: The ROWTATE vocational rehabilitation intervention was delivered remotely by trained OTs and CPs. Training included competency assessments, mentoring and adaptation for telerehabilitation. The intervention was delivered over multiple sessions, with content tailored to individual patient needs.
Therapists found the training useful, reported positive attitudes (Evidence-Based Practice Attitude Scale mean=2.9 (SD 0.9)) and high levels of confidence in delivering evidence-based practice (range 75%–100%) and the ROWTATE intervention (range 80%–100%). Intervention barriers identified pretraining became facilitators post-training. Half the therapists needed additional support post-training through mentoring or additional training. The intervention and training were successfully adapted for remote delivery. High levels of fidelity (intervention components delivered: OTs=84.5%, CPs=92.9%) and session attendance rates were found (median: OT=97%, CP=100%). Virtually all sessions were delivered remotely (OT=98%, CP=100%). The intervention was acceptable to patients and therapists; both considered face-to-face delivery where necessary was important.
The ROWTATE intervention was delivered remotely with high fidelity and attendance and was acceptable to patients and therapists. Definitive trial key changes include modifying therapist training, competency assessment, face-to-face intervention delivery where necessary and addressing lower fidelity intervention components.
by Emmanuel Timmy Donkoh, Iddrisu Wahab Abdul, Abraham Kwadzo Ahiakpa, Isaac Williams, Rita Nyaaba Akologo, Stephen Danyo, Chrysantus Kubio, Kofi Effah, Joseph Emmanuel Amuah
BackgroundCervical cancer, though preventable, remains the second most diagnosed cancer and the primary cause of cancer-related deaths among females in Sub-Saharan Africa. The significance of coordinated screening programmes for reducing the burden of cervical cancer in Africa is not well documented. This systematic review will summarize published reports from key databases, grey literature and programme reports to assess the performance of cervical cancer prevention programmes in Ghana.
MethodsTo be eligible for inclusion, interventions must target Ghanaian women with cervical cancer screening and prevention strategies using methods such as visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA), mobile colposcopy, HPV DNA testing, cytology (Pap smear), and treatment approaches such as cryotherapy, thermal ablation, loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP). A comprehensive electronic search strategy will be used to identify studies published since database inception, and indexed in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and Web of Science. The search strategy will include MeSH terms (and synonyms) relevant to cervical cancer, screening/treatment methods, geographic focus and implementing institution. We will include searches for grey literature, recognizing the value of programmatic and governmental reports that might not appear in traditional databases. Search results will be summarized in line with PRISMA guidelines. The GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) approach will be used to evaluate and document evidence certainty for all outcomes, internal validity of included reports, inconsistency, indirectness, imprecision, and publication bias. Where sufficient homogeneity exists among included studies in terms of interventions, study designs, populations, and outcome measures, we will perform a meta-analysis to calculate pooled effect estimates and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals.
SignificanceThis systematic review will assess the performance and impact of cervical cancer screening and prevention programmes conducted in Ghana to date and identify what contextual strategies have delivered the most impact as well as highlight what gaps remain in our understanding of how a nationwide screening programme can be properly construed for maximum impact.
To describe a sample of healthcare professionals' responses to the valid and reliable Climate and Health Tool and compare participant characteristics relating to Climate and Health Tool subscales.
Observational, cross-sectional, multi-site study.
An electronic survey containing the Climate and Health Tool was administered to healthcare professionals across a large, multi-state health system in the Western United States with a committed effort to reducing carbon emissions.
One thousand three hundred and sixty-three participants reported moderately elevated levels of awareness and concern around climate impacts on health and motivation to participate in climate protective actions. Respondents reported moderate levels of climate-protecting behaviours at home and low levels at work. Females were more concerned and motivated. Medical staff and respondents reporting familiarity with system environmental initiatives reported more awareness and behaviours at home to preserve climate health.
Healthcare professionals are concerned and motivated to decrease climate impacts on health yet take little action at work to preserve the climate. Because of the intersection of climate change, health, and healthcare, healthcare organizations should prioritize and support meaningful action for healthcare professionals to meet community climate health needs.
Healthcare organizations committed to contributing to climate solutions can use this research to increase healthcare professionals' education, engagement, and impact to preserve the climate and health of communities.
Healthcare is a major contributor to carbon emissions, yet healthcare professionals' awareness, motivation, concern, and behaviours related to climate change and health were not clear. Our research showed healthcare professionals are aware and concerned about climate impacts on health but reported low levels of workplace behaviours to protect the climate. The findings of our research will impact healthcare professionals and healthcare organizations to focus efforts on climate-preserving behaviours.
This manuscript followed the STROBE guidelines.
None.
Preoperative prehabilitation programmes for patients with colorectal cancer have been shown to reduce complications and hospital length of stay. However, supervised weekly physiotherapy is expensive and timeconsuming for both healthcare professionals and patients, leading to suboptimal implementation of prehabilitation programmes. A previous study demonstrated that offering home-based prehabilitation through an app is feasible and leads to outcomes comparable to supervised prehabilitation programmes. This study was conducted at a single hospital. To expand this promising modality nationwide, it is essential to identify key implementation determinants. We therefore initiated this multicentre study involving a more diverse and heterogeneous patient population. The findings of this study will provide valuable input for scaling strategies for prehabilitation programmes in the Netherlands and beyond.
In this prospective multicentre cohort study, approximately 300 patients with colorectal cancer scheduled for curative surgery will be enrolled over 12 months. The study adopts a hybrid type 3 design, reporting clinical outcomes while exploring implementation-related factors. Five hospitals with varied profiles (academic, non-academic teaching and general hospitals) and geographical locations (urban and rural, high and low socioeconomic areas) are participating. The primary endpoint is the identification of barriers and facilitators, using both qualitative (interviews) and quantitative (user statistics, questionnaires) data from stakeholders. Secondary endpoints include fitness and clinical outcomes such as complications and mortality.
This study was approved by the METC (Medisch Ethische Toetsings Commissie / Dutch Medical Ethics Committee) and was established not to apply to the Medical Research Involving Human Subjects Act (WMO / Wet Medisch Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek met mensen); submission was 21 April 2025. The app is proven safe and feasible in earlier studies and is CE certified (Conformité Européenne). Informed consent will be obtained from all patients (Supplement 1). Adverse events will be monitored and reported. Only researchers will have access to the final dataset. Results will be disseminated through publications, patient group briefings and implementation feedback to healthcare workers. Plans for sharing deidentified individual clinical trial participant-level data consist of quotes from interviews held on stakeholders. This study protocol adheres to the SPIRIT guidelines.
To conduct a synthesis of existing empirical and grey literature to identify the contexts and mechanisms that enable the adoption, offer, uptake and return of faecal immunochemical testing (FIT) in the primary care pathway in England, UK, for patients with signs or symptoms of suspected colorectal cancer (CRC). From this, develop a theory about how specific programme activities lead to certain outcomes.
A realist synthesis.
Medline (OVID), EMBASE (OVID), CINAHL (EBSCO), Scopus (Elsevier) and grey literature sources until end of July 2023.
The purpose of the work was to determine how different factors interact within a health system to optimise the approach to implementing and using symptomatic FIT (sFIT) in clinical practice for patient benefit. The criteria used to bound the scope of the synthesis included date (published between 2017 and July 2023), exposure of interest (sFIT in the primary care pathway for patients with signs or symptoms of suspected CRC), geographic location of study (countries that make up the UK), language (English) and participants (adults). Any study design and type of publication was considered.
Given the recognised lack of literature on the implementation of sFIT, it was crucial to include insights from grey literature. To do this, key national groups and organisations—involved or related to this subject—were methodically identified and appropriate papers and reports identified.
A thematic approach was used to identify relevant data in included records and allow realist insights to be obtained. Inductive and deductive coding enabled detection of key data. Arguments were generated and developed into context–mechanism–outcome configurations (CMOCs). Iteratively, an initial list of 38 CMOCs was refined to 14 themes and 19 CMOCs. These were then structured to create a multifaceted, multilevel realist synthesis programme theory.
Systematic searching led to the full appraisal of 99 records to determine suitability of each to confirm, refute or help develop theory. Studies were assessed for rigour and relevance to inform selection. The process resulted in 45 records being chosen for inclusion, of which 28 were from database searches and 17 from grey literature sources.
The key contexts and mechanisms that help optimise adoption, offer, uptake and return of sFIT have been elucidated (although partially). These can be broadly summarised into the 10 ‘Cs’: creating a compelling Case and Conditions for change, reaching Consensus through Collaborative working, fostering a Culture that values Clinical judgement, building Confidence by developing Capabilities and, finally, ensuring Clarity and Coherence of both practical processes and safety netting procedures.
Fundamentally, optimising the adoption, offer, uptake and return of sFIT in primary care for patients with signs or symptoms of suspected CRC is predicated on developing the acceptability of this initiative to every stakeholder at every level within a health system.
To explore what content, teaching and learning activities are advocated by nurse educators to mitigate moral distress and related concepts in student nurses.
Scoping review.
The review was conducted according to Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines. The search strategy adopted their three-step method for systematic reviews. The eligibility criteria reflected the Population, Concept, Context format.
CINAHL Ultimate, MEDLINE Full Text, APA PsycINFO, Education Research Complete, Web of Science, ProQuest, Base, and Open Grey were systematically searched in September 2024 for papers in English language regardless of publication age.
Following searches, 3809 records were screened against eligibility criteria, resulting in 42 eligible papers being included; 29 research studies and 13 non-empirical papers. We identified 236 content suggestions, mapped to 70 subject codes. Also, 217 teaching and learning activities are suggested and mapped to 41 coded activities. Data is charted in tables and figures and results are discussed per related concept of moral distress.
Educational content, and teaching and learning activities are heterogenous across the concepts influencing moral distress. There is overlap of content across different concepts. Moral sensitivity received the most publications. Development of research and educational strategies addressing other interrelated concepts would be advantageous for evidence-based curriculum development. Recommendations are made to develop evidence-based content and teaching and learning activities.
Recommendations are made to develop an evidence-based multi-conceptual curriculum to mitigate moral distress in pre-registration student nurses.
Recommendations are made adding to existing research agendas on the topic.
PRISMA-ScR.
No patient or public contribution.
To identify interventions and strategies to prevent patient- and visitor-perpetrated violence against nurses working in acute hospital Emergency Departments. Design Scoping review following the Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines.
A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed and CINAHL to identify relevant studies published up to June 2024. The review included primary research studies employing quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-method approaches. Eligibility criteria focused on interventions aimed at preventing physical and verbal violence in acute hospital emergency settings, explicitly targeting nurses. The selection process followed PRISMA-ScR guidelines, with independent screening and data extraction by two reviewer pairs. Data Sources PubMed and CINAHL databases were searched for studies published up to June 2024.
A total of 40 studies were included, covering interventions across 11 countries, mostly from the United States. Interventions were categorised as organisational, environmental, or individual-focused. Training programs were the most common strategy, followed by risk assessment tools, defense strategies, multidisciplinary briefings, and technology-assisted interventions. Most interventions (73%) were implemented before violent incidents, 23% during, and 5% after. Healthcare workers, particularly nurses, were the primary target group, highlighting the need for effective preventive strategies.
Violence prevention interventions in Emergency Departments focus on pre-incident strategies, mainly organisational and individual-focused. Limited attention has been given to environmental interventions despite their role in mitigating workplace violence. Further research is needed to assess the long-term effectiveness of these strategies.
Addressing workplace violence in EDs ensures a safer work environment, improves staff retention, and enhances patient care quality.
This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct, or reporting.
The ROWTATE intervention helps people experiencing trauma to return to work (RTW) through vocational rehabilitation (VR) support from occupational therapists (OTs) and clinical psychologists (CPs). This study aims to explore and understand the acceptability of VR after traumatic injury for patients, therapists and employers.
Qualitative interviews in eight major trauma regions, UK.
Interviews were undertaken with a range of stakeholders—15 patients, 15 therapists and 6 employers. Data were analysed using the theoretical framework of acceptability.
Stakeholders understood the aim of the intervention was to support people to RTW and perceived it as effective in achieving this. Patients and therapists understood the benefits of working with a combination of occupational therapy and clinical psychology. The intervention fits with the values of patients wanting to recover, therapists wanting to offer support and line managers wanting to meet employer and employee needs.
Patients reported they could not have achieved RTW without the intervention, and their therapist helped them feel less alone. Therapists felt that their work was rewarding, effective and had good outcomes. Patients perceived remote delivery as less burdensome than attending in person. Therapists felt they wasted time on non-patient activity, such as (re-)arranging appointments.
Employers discussed the difficulty of balancing employer and employee needs and managing uncertainty. Some workplace policies lacked flexibility, and without the ROWTATE intervention, employers lacked confidence in supporting employees RTW.
A VR intervention delivered remotely by OTs and CPs is acceptable to patients, therapists and employers.
Hearing loss is highly prevalent and impacts many aspects of a person’s life, including communication, social engagement, employment, general health and well-being. Yet, many people do not access hearing healthcare and are unaware of the range of hearing healthcare options available. Barriers to hearing healthcare include poor understanding of hearing loss and its impact; poor knowledge of help-seeking for hearing healthcare options; minimal support to help decide which option is best; and stigma related to hearing loss. These barriers lead to many people not receiving the hearing healthcare they need. Guided by theories of behaviour change and implementation science, HearChoice, an online tailored decision support intervention, has been co-developed to empower adults with hearing difficulties by offering them choice and control over their own hearing healthcare. HearChoice aims to facilitate informed decisions, accessibility and uptake of hearing healthcare, including a wide range of interventions, for adults with hearing difficulties. The objectives of the trial are to evaluate the effectiveness, health economics and feasibility of HearChoice.
This online randomised controlled trial will recruit participants with hearing difficulties across Australia, with an anticipated sample size of 640. Participants will be randomised to either HearChoice (treatment) or an Australia-specific Hearing Option Grid (active control), both delivered online. Outcomes will be assessed at baseline when the interventions will be offered, at 7 days post-intervention (primary endpoint) and at 3 months post-intervention. An email reminder will be sent at 1-month post-intervention. The primary outcome is decisional conflict. Secondary outcomes include measures of readiness and self-efficacy to take action, hearing-related quality of life and empowerment, assessment of the value and impact of HearChoice, work performance and health, and feasibility measures. Primary analysis will compare outcomes between HearChoice and the active control at the primary endpoint.
The study was approved by the Curtin University Human Ethics Committee (HRE2023-0024). All participants will provide written informed consent prior to participation. A broad dissemination plan of the study findings includes peer-reviewed publications, scientific conference presentations, articles and presentations for the wider community and public written in lay and accessible language, and social media.
Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12624001139561).
This scoping review aims to explore the existing research on the impact of authentic leadership on nurses' innovative behaviours.
The following databases were searched (from 2013 to 2023): PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Cochrane Library, Embase, Scopus, APA Psych Info, Educational Resources Information Centre, and ABI Inform.
Search results were exported into Covidence software to assist with the selection and assessment of retrieved studies. Studies were included that specifically examined the relationship between authentic leadership and innovative behaviour among nurses working in healthcare settings.
12 papers remained for full-text review after title and abstract screening. Four studies that met the inclusion criteria were included in the final analysis. Using the Crowe Critical Appraisal Tool two reviewers independently evaluated these four studies. Findings revealed that authentic leadership affects nurses' innovation and creativity in various healthcare settings and cultural contexts. It also highlighted mediating factors such as increased engagement and knowledge sharing. Resilience and technological infrastructure were identified as additional factors that affect and support this relationship and influence the development and enaction of innovative behaviours.
Authentic leadership was found to contribute to innovative nursing behaviours that have important implications for the best practices in healthcare and outcomes.
Innovative behaviour among nurses is essential for rising to the challenges of complex healthcare environmental challenges, and the potential for authentic leadership to act as a catalyst for this is important. Future research needs to further explore the impact of authentic leadership on innovative behaviour and the contextual and cultural influences that effect this. More research is also needed on the exact nature of nurses' innovations and their potential use in healthcare.
The EQUATOR guidelines for PRISMA have been met.
No patient or public contribution.
Assessment of Different NEoplasias in the adneXa (ADNEX) and Risk of Malignancy Index (RMI) are models that estimate the risk of malignancy in ovarian masses based on clinical and ultrasound information. The aim is to perform a meta-analysis of studies that compared the performance of the two models in the same patients (‘head-to-head comparison’).
Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Systematic literature search from publication of ADNEX model (15/10/2014) up to 31/07/2024 in Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, Medline (via PubMed) and EuropePMC.
We included all studies that externally validated the performance of ADNEX (with or without CA125) and RMI on the same data.
Two independent reviewers extracted data using a standardised extraction sheet. We assessed risk of bias using PROBAST. We performed random effects meta-analysis of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity and clinical utility (net benefit, relative utility and probability of being useful in a hypothetical new centre) at thresholds commonly used clinically (10% risk of malignancy for ADNEX, 200 for RMI).
We included 11 studies comprising 8271 tumours. Most studies were at high risk of bias. The summary AUC to distinguish benign from malignant tumours in operated patients for ADNEX with CA125 was 0.92 (95% CI 0.90 to 0.94) and for RMI it was 0.85 (0.81 to 0.89). Sensitivity and specificity for ADNEX with CA125 were 0.93 (0.90 to 0.96) and 0.77 (0.71 to 0.81) and for RMI, they were 0.61 (0.56 to 0.67) and 0.92 (0.89 to 0.94). The probability of the test being useful in a hypothetical new centre in operated patients was 96% for ADNEX with CA125 and 15% for RMI at the selected thresholds.
ADNEX has better discrimination and clinical utility than RMI.
This paper outlines key developments, innovations, and milestones in the field of spirituality and spiritual care in nursing.
A discursive paper.
Nursing scholars have significantly influenced the profession and contributed to the development of nursing knowledge, particularly in the field of spirituality and spiritual care. Key research has focused on nurses' perceptions and attitudes toward spirituality, clarifying foundational spiritual concepts, and establishing a framework of core spiritual care competencies for the profession.
Despite these advancements, significant gaps remain in nurses' knowledge, understanding, and experience in providing spiritual care. The development of agreed-upon spiritual care competencies at the European level offers important guidance for the profession, and educational initiatives are underway to support their integration. However, the field remains in an early stage of development, and further research is needed to embed spiritual care competencies into national and international nursing policy and practice. Moreover, continued research is also essential to inform and evaluate current educational programmes and nursing interventions, and to support the translation of evidence-based knowledge into effective spiritual care delivery.
Spiritual support is proven to be an important consideration for many patients and families globally. Imbedding spiritual care education into both undergraduate and postgraduate nursing curricula is essential to prepare nurses to address the spiritual needs of patients in healthcare settings. Structured curricula that provide clear instructions on how to recognise, assess, and respond to spiritual concerns in clinical practice can enhance nurses' competence and confidence. Embedding spiritual care into education and training helps normalise spiritual care as a component of holistic nursing, supporting its inclusion in everyday care rather than treating it as an optional or marginal practice. Such educational integration has the potential to improve the consistency and quality of spiritual care across healthcare settings.
Internationally there are evident gaps in the consistent provision of spiritual care to patients and their families. These are being addressed through conceptual clarity, the agreed-upon competencies, and enhanced educational initiatives. It is essential to continue to increase awareness among the nursing profession on the necessity of addressing spiritual care needs, within the context of cultural perspectives to ensure that value is placed on the significance of these issues on a global scale.
There was no patient or publication contribution in this specific commentary.
Cluster analysis, a machine learning-based and data-driven technique for identifying groups in data, has demonstrated its potential in a wide range of contexts. However, critical appraisal and reproducibility are often limited by insufficient reporting, ultimately hampering the interpretation and trust of key stakeholders. The present paper describes the protocol that will guide the development of a reporting guideline and checklist for studies incorporating cluster analyses—Transparent Reporting of Cluster Analyses.
Following the recommended steps for developing reporting guidelines outlined by the Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research Network, the work will be divided into six stages. Stage 1: literature review to guide development of initial checklist. Stage 2: drafting of the initial checklist. Stage 3: internal revision of checklist. Stage 4: Delphi study in a global sample of researchers from varying fields (n=) to derive consensus regarding items in the checklist and piloting of the checklist. Stage 5: consensus meeting to consolidate checklist. Stage 6: production of statement paper and explanation and elaboration paper. Stage 7: dissemination via journals, conferences, social media and a dedicated web platform.
Due to local regulations, the planned study is exempt from the requirement of ethical review. The findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications. The checklist with explanations will also be made available freely on a dedicated web platform (troca-statement.org) and in a repository.
Various instruments exist for assessing agitation and broader non-cognitive symptoms in dementia (NCSD). However, the feasibility and practicality of using these instruments in residential settings with people with advanced dementia have not been evaluated. The aim of our review is to identify the available evidence regarding tools for measuring (1) Agitation and (2) NCSD in people with advanced dementia in residential settings, in terms of use (feasibility and psychometric properties) in this population.
Literature searches will be carried out in Medline, Embase, CINAHL, PsycInfo, Scopus, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Grey literature databases and relevant websites will also be explored for guidance documents, task reports, etc. A three-stage screening process will be adopted and will include pilot testing of source selectors. Two reviewers will independently perform title and abstract screening, then full text screening, against the defined eligibility criteria. This scoping review protocol was registered with Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/p7g86).
Due to the nature of the scoping review, ethical approval is not required. Results will be disseminated in a peer-reviewed journal and at international conferences.
Pharmacogenomic testing could potentially reduce the number of adverse drug reactions and improve treatment outcomes through tailoring treatment to an individual’s genetic makeup. Despite its benefits and the ambitions to integrate into routine care, the implementation of pharmacogenomic testing in primary care settings remains limited. This study aims to qualitatively explore the views of healthcare professionals (HCPs) and patients on implementing pharmacogenomic testing in the UK National Health Service (NHS) primary care setting and to estimate the cost-effectiveness of service-delivery implementation by comparing different HCPs’ models of care.
This study consists of three workstreams (WS). WS1 is semi-structured interviews with General Practitioners, pharmacists, nurses and patients (24 participants) to explore implementation issues, including the perceived barriers and facilitators to delivering a pharmacogenomic service. WS2 consists of focus groups (between 24–36 participants) with genomic experts to develop practical pharmacogenomic-guided clinical pathways for primary care. WS3 will estimate the cost-effectiveness of implementing pharmacogenomic testing when led by different HCPs incorporating parameters from the literature, expert opinions, as well as data from WS1 and WS2.
Thematic analysis will be used to analyse the qualitative data from WS1 and WS2, mapping findings onto the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research domains, which will also be used as the theoretical framework. WS3 will be a decision-analytic model developed in Microsoft Excel to compare the cost-effectiveness of pharmacist-led, GP-led, nurse-led or multidisciplinary pathways.
This study has been approved by the NHS Health Research Authority and Health and Care Research Wales (24/PR/1088). Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations and engagement with NHS policymakers and Genomics England.
FreshRSS 