Conectar
by Elham Ahmadi, Sophia Baierl, Stephan Voss, Ida Asenkerschbaumer, Ursula Berndt, Leonie Bernhard, Anita Hennig, Anna-Lena Würfele, Michaela Coenen
Urban soundscapes, particularly those experienced in green spaces, have been increasingly recognized as factors that influence human mental health. This scoping review explores the existing literature on soundscapes within urban green spaces and their associated mental health outcomes. It aims to classify the methodologies used in this domain, identify mental health outcomes related to urban green space soundscapes, and examine specific soundscape elements and their correlations with mental health. A systematic search of peer-reviewed studies was conducted. After screening titles, abstracts, and full texts, 22 studies met the inclusion criteria. Diverse methodological approaches were identified, with an emphasis on quantitative multi-method designs. Commonly studied mental health outcomes include stress reduction, mood enhancement, perceived restorativeness, and cognitive restoration. Standardized psychometric tools, such as the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-14), Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) and Perceived Restorativeness Soundscape Scale (PRSS) are frequently used as outcome measures. Natural soundscape elements such as birdsong, water sounds, and rustling leaves had a positive association with relaxation and perceived mental restoration throughout all studies, while mechanical sounds, such as traffic noise were linked to adverse mental health outcomes. These findings highlight that natural soundscapes in urban green spaces have a potential positive relationship with mental health by reducing stress and enhancing mood. However, the cross-sectional design and methodological heterogeneity of the included studies limit causal interpretation. Future research should explore multi-sensory experiences and examine soundscapes in diverse urban contexts to provide more robust insights into their relationship with mental health. The practical implications suggest that urban planners should prioritize integrating natural sound elements into urban areas to improve mental health. The study protocol of this scoping review had been registered at OSF (osf.io/4r7gd).Enteric fever, primarily caused by Salmonella enterica Typhi and Salmonella enterica Paratyphi A (SPA), is endemic mainly in South Asia, disproportionately affecting school-age children. Although typhoid conjugate vaccines (TCVs) are effective and implemented in many countries, no licensed vaccine exists against paratyphoid A. Bivalent vaccines targeting both S. Typhi and SPA may address this gap. Although field efficacy trials are not considered feasible, controlled human infection models (CHIMs) offer an alternative pathway for evaluating vaccine efficacy. This will be the first efficacy study of a bivalent vaccine against typhoid and paratyphoid A using a paratyphoid CHIM.
This is a phase II multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial assessing the efficacy and immunogenicity of a bivalent conjugate vaccine candidate, Serum Institute of India Typhoid Conjugate Vaccine (Bivalent) (SII-TCV(B)), against SPA using a CHIM in healthy UK adults aged 18–55 years. A total of 192 participants will be randomised 1:1 to receive either SII-TCV(B) or a licensed Vi-polysaccharide typhoid vaccine (Vi-PS). All participants will be orally challenged with S. Paratyphi A (strain NVGH308) 28 days postvaccination. Participants will be monitored closely for 14 days and treated at 14 days postchallenge or promptly on diagnosis, according to prespecified criteria. The primary objective is to evaluate vaccine efficacy of SII-TCV(B) against paratyphoid infection using a CHIM. The coprimary immunogenicity objective is to assess non-inferiority of the typhoid IgG response compared with a licensed Vi-PS control.
The study has received ethical approval from the Berkshire Research Ethics Committee (24/SC/0309) and regulatory approval from the UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency. Results will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publications and scientific meetings.
Cluster analysis, a machine learning-based and data-driven technique for identifying groups in data, has demonstrated its potential in a wide range of contexts. However, critical appraisal and reproducibility are often limited by insufficient reporting, ultimately hampering the interpretation and trust of key stakeholders. The present paper describes the protocol that will guide the development of a reporting guideline and checklist for studies incorporating cluster analyses—Transparent Reporting of Cluster Analyses.
Following the recommended steps for developing reporting guidelines outlined by the Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research Network, the work will be divided into six stages. Stage 1: literature review to guide development of initial checklist. Stage 2: drafting of the initial checklist. Stage 3: internal revision of checklist. Stage 4: Delphi study in a global sample of researchers from varying fields (n=) to derive consensus regarding items in the checklist and piloting of the checklist. Stage 5: consensus meeting to consolidate checklist. Stage 6: production of statement paper and explanation and elaboration paper. Stage 7: dissemination via journals, conferences, social media and a dedicated web platform.
Due to local regulations, the planned study is exempt from the requirement of ethical review. The findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications. The checklist with explanations will also be made available freely on a dedicated web platform (troca-statement.org) and in a repository.
FreshRSS 