Conectar
According to the WHO, healthcare in Europe requires ‘systemic change through innovation’ if it is to respond to the demographic, epidemiological, environmental and technological challenges the region is facing. However, top-down methods of innovation in healthcare, driven by the macro levels of the system, have been struggling to impact the healthcare system at the scale that is required to drive meaningful and sustainable change. It has been widely acknowledged that frontline-led, employee-driven innovation will be the main driver to ensure that innovation in healthcare is human-centred and prioritises the needs of the patients.
This study protocol presents a research project designed to evaluate the experiences of frontline innovators supported by the Irish Health Service Executive’s HSE Spark Innovation programme. The purpose of this research is threefold. First, the findings will further strengthen the provision of support for frontline healthcare professionals, ensuring that they can continue to address the challenges they experience in providing care. Second, the research will provide insight into the structures required to support frontline innovation within the public healthcare sector, forming a starting point for other public sector organisations interested in establishing their own support system for frontline innovation. Finally, it will highlight the impact supporting frontline clinicians to innovate has on service users, staff and the wider healthcare organisation.
A qualitative research design, situated in a phenomenological framework, will be adopted for this research. ‘Participants’ in this study will include staff from the Irish public healthcare system who have obtained innovation support (either funding or human centred design support) from HSE Spark. The participants will be invited to share their experiences of the innovation support they received from HSE Spark, as well as their understanding of the impact of this support on their professional development, their service and the wider healthcare organisation. A stratified purposive sampling approach will be used to ensure the sample provides information-rich representations of individuals’ experiences engaging innovation initiatives supported by HSE Spark. One-to-one, semistructured interviews will be conducted with participants. Transcripts from these interviews will be analysed through a thematic approach, using the data analysis software NVivo. Themes will be derived from the data and used to understand the healthcare professionals’ experiences of engaging with innovation projects and with the support provided to them by HSE Spark. These themes will be used to identify the unspoken needs of innovators within healthcare, the support they need to continue innovating in this sector, and the impact supporting frontline innovation has on the service users, staff and the healthcare organisation.
We used the Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (SRQR) reporting guideline to draft this manuscript, and the SRQR reporting checklist when editing.
Ethics approval for this study has been obtained from HSE Regional Ethics Committee (No. 20251650-RDMLRREC) and Maynooth University Social Sciences Research Committee (Approval Number: SRESC-2025-40031). Dissemination of results will be via journal articles, conference presentations and proceedings. Study findings will be disseminated in peer-reviewed journals and through conference presentations. Lay summaries of the findings will also be prepared for distribution in internal Irish Health Service publications. Other dissemination activities include the preparation of a book of case studies and key findings on the challenges of integrating human-centred design into public services, to be presented to the Irish Department of Public Expenditure and Reform.
To compare primary care for depression among patients detected in the first 21 months of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic to patients detected pre-pandemic, and examine whether depression care was associated with patient characteristics.
Retrospective pre–post study using de-identified data from electronic medical record data from the Canadian Primary Care Sentinel Surveillance Network (CPCSSN).
Primary care clinics enrolled in CPCSSN from 1 January 2018 to 31 December 2021.
Patients with a valid CPCSSN case definition of depression detected between 01 January 2018 and 31 December 2021 were included in the cohort and categorised by detection date (pre-pandemic or during Canadian pandemic waves).
Primary care encounters, psychotropic prescriptions and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) prescriptions were observed at 3 and 12 months post-detection. Multivariable regression evaluated associations between patients’ depression detection timing and depression care, adjusting for age, sex, rurality, neighbourhood deprivation quintile, province, number of observable comorbidities and pre-detection psychotropic use.
91 453 patients with depression were identified, of whom 53% were detected pre-pandemic. Patients detected during the pandemic were younger and less comorbid than those detected pre-pandemic. Proportions of patients with any encounter, psychotropic prescriptions and SSRI prescriptions were higher for patients detected during every pandemic wave compared with patients detected pre-pandemic. The adjusted incidence rate ratios (aIRRs) of number of encounters (aIRR=1.15; 95% CI 1.13 to 1.17), psychotropics (aIRR=1.11, 95% CI 1.09 to 1.13) and SSRIs prescribed (aIRR=1.12; 95% CI 1.10 to 1.15) within 3 months of detection were higher among patients detected during the first pandemic wave compared with those detected pre-pandemic. Socio-demographic characteristics had weaker associations with outcomes compared with timing of detection. Results were similar within 12 months of detection.
Overall, primary care for depression was maintained during the pandemic despite challenging circumstances. Increases in paediatric encounter rates and increased prescribing in younger adults warrant further investigation to understand the factors driving these patterns.
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05813652.
To explore the published literature on nurse/midwife and peer worker collaborations in healthcare services.
Scoping review and narrative synthesis.
The framework proposed by Levac et al. was used. PubMed, CINAHL, MEDLINE, Scopus, and Embase databases were systematically searched, and results uploaded to Covidence for screening against inclusion criteria. A critical narrative synthesis of included studies was conducted, guided by Popay et al.
Sixteen studies from five countries met the inclusion criteria. They examined peer worker and nurse/midwife collaboration across diverse settings including cancer, HIV, mental health, and community services. Findings indicated that nurse/midwives and peer workers valued the distinct forms of expertise they contributed, which enhanced care. Tensions in collaboration related to clinical dominance and control in hierarchical structures, challenges navigating scope and role boundaries, and mistaken notions of what constitutes ‘successful’ peer work. Peer workers and nurses/midwives could be ‘close strangers’ with little opportunity to build genuine rapport.
Successful collaboration requires attention to power dynamics within healthcare cultures and opportunities to connect and understand each other's disciplinary expertise. Identifying strategies to optimise partnership and mobilise collective strengths has the potential to further enhance care.
Peer worker or ‘lived experience’ roles within healthcare services have rapidly expanded. Our study highlights the benefits of peer worker and nurse/midwife collaborations and areas that require attention, including recognition of peer worker and nurse/midwife roles and responsibilities in the healthcare setting and effective integration of peer workers into existing healthcare teams. Importantly, strategies should be developed to address disparate power dynamics between nursing/midwifery staff and peer workers as these impact workforce relations and capability. Addressing these key areas will strengthen collaboration between nurses/midwives and peer workers, improve healthcare provision, and ultimately benefit service users.
This study highlights the tensions arising when nurses/midwives and peer workers carry out duties alongside each other, as well as factors that can promote effective collaboration. Successful collaboration in healthcare necessitates addressing power differentials, fostering mutual understanding, and providing the tools, training, and inclusive environments needed for nurses/midwives and peer workers to work together effectively.
This scoping review adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) extension for scoping reviews.
Our authorship team includes experts with experience in peer work and supervision of peer workers, and designing and implementing peer-led interventions within health and community service settings.
To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of implementing a penicillin allergy assessment pathway (PAAP) versus usual care within the NHS.
A decision tree analysis over a 5-year time-period, informed by a randomised controlled trial (RCT) of PAAP and systematic review. Value of information analysis was also conducted to estimate the value of conducting a new trial.
Model inputs were informed by the ALABAMA RCT participants included in the primary analysis, 811 adults with penicillin allergy labels and recent antibiotic prescriptions, and data from published literature.
Participants in the ALABAMA trial included in the primary analysis: PAAP (n=401) and usual care (n=410).
Costs are presented in GBP (£) at 2022–2023 prices, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, incremental net monetary benefit (INMB), the probability of cost-effectiveness at the £20,000 and £30,000 per QALY threshold, and the cost effectiveness of a new follow-on trial.
PAAP had incremental costs of £–83 (probability of cost saving 47.5%) and incremental QALYs of 0.036 (probability of positive benefits 47.5%). The INMBs (probability of cost-effectiveness) were £806 (48%) and £1167 (48%) under the decision thresholds of £20,000 and £30,000 per QALY, respectively. PAAP was more cost-effective among females, people aged >65 years, and more frequent antibiotic users. A new follow-on trial involving 1267 participants was estimated to cost £2.4 million and, by reducing uncertainty in the evidence, would avoid £19.6 million in costs of incorrect management decisions for eligible patients over the next 10 years.
The PAAP was considered cost-effective, but significant uncertainty remained. Future trials with adequate power and longer follow-up are needed to determine the most cost-effective models for penicillin allergy testing.
Streptococcus pneumoniae serotype 3 (SPN3) remains a significant contributor to invasive pneumococcal disease globally, despite its inclusion in widely administered vaccines. The next generation of pneumococcal vaccines may confer better protection against this serotype, reducing disease burden. We describe an ethically approved protocol for a double-blind randomised controlled trial assessing the impact of VAXNEUVANCE (15-valent pneumococcal conjugated vaccine (PCV15)) and 0.9% saline (placebo) on the acquisition, density and duration of SPN3 carriage using a controlled human infection model.
Healthy adults aged 18–50 years will be randomised 1:1 to receive PCV15 or placebo. Participants will be considered enrolled on the trial at vaccination. One month following vaccination, all participants will be intranasally inoculated with SPN3. Following inoculation, participants will be followed up on days 2, 7, 14 and 28 to monitor safety, SPN3 colonisation status, density and duration, as well as immune responses. The primary endpoint of the study is to assess the rate of SPN3 acquisition between vaccinated and unvaccinated participants defined by classical microbiological methods. Secondary endpoints will determine the density and duration of SPN3 colonisation and compare the immune responses between study groups. An exploratory cohort of 5 participants will be asked to consent to a nasal biopsy procedure during a screening visit and a second nasal biopsy 28 days after PCV15 vaccination. This cohort will only receive PCV15 and will not be challenged. Through this exploratory cohort, we will explore gene expression changes induced by PCV15 vaccination and their visualisation (spatial location) within the nasal tissue.
This protocol has been reviewed by the sponsor, funder and external peer reviewers. The study is approved by the NHS Research and Ethics Committee (Reference: 24/SC/0388) and by the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (Reference: CTA 21584/0485/001-0001).
by Kennedy M. Peter-Marske, Annie Green Howard, Kelly R. Evenson, Sara Jones Berkeley, Joanna Maselko, Mario Sims, Stuart D. Russell, Anna Kucharska-Newton, Kevin J. Sullivan, Wayne D. Rosamond
We assessed whether social isolation (SI), social support (SS), and subtypes of SS were associated with self-rated health trajectories and clinical heart failure (HF) outcomes among participants with incident HF hospitalizations. We included 2967 Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities study participants with incident HF hospitalization after Visit 2 (1990–1992). SI, SS, and subtypes of SS were measured at Visit 2. We identified incident HF hospitalization as ICD-9 code 428 and physician adjudicated events; on average HF occurred 17 (SD 8) years after Visit 2. We assessed associations with trajectories of annually measured self-rated health in the 4 years prior to and after incident HF hospitalization (excellent/good self-rated health on a 0–100 scale), using linear mixed effects models. We calculated hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for associations with time to first all-cause rehospitalization and all-cause mortality using Cox proportional hazard models. Low overall SS had a 5.8 point (95% CI 7.8, 3.8) lower self-rated health value over time than high SS; associations of subtypes of SS with this outcome were similar. Low belonging SS was associated with greater days to first rehospitalization (HR 0.85; 95% CI 0.79, 0.96) compared to the highest tertile; however, belonging SS was not associated with mortality (HR 1.05; 95% CI 0.95, 1.17). Being socially isolated/high risk for SI was associated with greater hazard of all-cause mortality among females (HR 1.57; 95% CI 1.20, 2.06) but not males (HR 0.95; 95% CI 0.75, 1.19), compared to low SI. SI and SS were not associated with number of hospitalizations in the first year or percent of first year spent at home.Studying issues related to stroke medication non-adherence is essential for secondary prevention of stroke. This study aimed to identify the prevalence of medication non-adherence and risk factors among stroke survivors. The reasons behind this are that some patients may not follow stroke medication plans, and potential ways to help patients adhere better to medication plans.
This study employed a cross-sectional patient survey.
The study was conducted in 20 public and private healthcare facilities in a resource-constrained setting, in Punjab, the largest province of Pakistan.
We included 6538 stroke survivors aged 21–75 years with at least a 6 month history of stroke who were prescribed one or more anti-stroke medications and met the inclusion criteria.
The main outcome was medication non-adherence, measured by the Self-Efficacy for Appropriate Medication Scale (SEAMS) and self-reported pill count. Descriptive statistics were used to summarise study variables. chi-square (²)/Fisher’s exact test and independent t-test/ANOVA were employed. A generalised linear model (logit model using multivariable logistic regression shows that several factors are associated with medication non-adherence and adherence. Odds ratio (OR) plots were generated using Seaborn and Matplotlib.
Non-adherence based on pill counts was 49.7%, while the mean SEAMS score (31.3±7.7) showed moderate self-reported adherence. After adjusting for age, gender, marital status, education, income, health insurance, smoking status, comorbidities, stroke type, disease duration, blood pressure control, number of medications, dosing frequency, physiotherapy continuation, perceived side effects and doctor-patient satisfaction, we found that female gender (vs male: AOR 0.31, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.35), lower income (10k–25k PKR vs >100k PKR: AOR 0.31, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.41; 26k–50k PKR vs >100k PKR: AOR 0.57, 95% CI 0.47 to 0.68), primary/secondary education (vs postgraduate: AOR 0.74, 95% CI 0.64 to 0.87), controlled BP (vs uncontrolled: AOR 0.66, 95% CI 0.59 to 0.73), longer disease duration (≥5 years vs
This study addresses the significant issue of medication non-adherence in stroke patients in Pakistan, reflecting global patterns yet remaining under-explored locally. It emphasises the critical role of adherence in managing chronic conditions such as stroke, where consistent use of preventive therapies is vital for reducing recurrence and improving outcomes. While the non-adherence rates are consistent with global trends, there is a notable lack of observational studies and epidemiological data in the Pakistani context. Our findings support a comprehensive approach to enhance medication adherence, taking into account the complex connections among social, behavioural and clinical factors. It also highlights the importance of maintaining detailed records to monitor adherence trends, identify high-risk groups and inform targeted public health interventions.
Distal radius fractures are the most common fractures seen in the emergency department in children in the USA. However, no established or standardised guidelines exist for the optimal management of completely displaced fractures in younger children. The proposed multicentre randomised trial will compare functional outcomes between children treated with fracture reduction under sedation versus children treated with simple immobilisation.
Participants aged 4–10 years presenting to the emergency department with 100% dorsally translated metaphyseal fractures of the radius less than 5 cm from the distal radial physis will be recruited for the study. Those patients with open fractures, other ipsilateral arm fractures (excluding ulna), pathologic fractures, bone diseases, or neuromuscular or metabolic conditions will be excluded. Participants who agree to enrol in the trial will be randomly assigned via a minimal sufficient balance algorithm to either sedated reduction or in situ immobilisation. A sample size of 167 participants per arm will provide at least 90% power to detect a difference in the primary outcome of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Upper Extremity computer adaptive test scores of 4 points at 1 year from treatment. Primary analyses will employ a linear mixed model to estimate the treatment effect at 1 year. Secondary outcomes include additional measures of perceived pain, complications, radiographic angulation, satisfaction and additional procedures (revisions, refractures, reductions and reoperations).
Ethical approval was obtained from the following local Institutional Review Boards: Advarra, serving as the single Institutional Review Board, approved the study (Pro00062090) in April 2022. The Hospital for Sick Children (Toronto, ON, Canada) did not rely on Advarra and received separate approval from their local Research Ethics Board (REB; REB number: 1000079992) on 19 July 2023. Results will be disseminated through publication in peer-reviewed journals and presentations at international conference meetings.
The purpose of this study was to explore the experiences of informal caregivers receiving nurse telephone support for an older person discharged from hospital and how the nursing support influenced their experiences of caring.
A descriptive qualitative study.
Purposive sampling was used to recruit participants who cared for older adults from two states in Australia between April 2022 and March 2023 for one-on-one interviews 6 months (n = 28) and 12 months (n = 24) after patient discharge from hospital. Inductive directional content analysis was used to analyse the qualitative data.
Three themes were identified: (1) Caregiving elicited a complex mix of emotions; (2) nursing support improved caregivers' preparedness to care over time and (3) caregivers welcomed emotional and practical support as they took on new responsibilities. They reflected that nurse telephone support offered emotional and practical support, helping caregivers feel more confident and less stressed in the caregiving role.
The study highlighted the value of proactive nurse-led programs to support informal caregivers after patient discharge from hospital, improving their experience. Providing ongoing support after discharge via telephone communication can play a critical role in caregiver wellbeing and facilitate the sustainability of their caregiving responsibilities in the home.
Study design and conduct are reported in line with the consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative studies (COREQ) guidelines.
The research team includes a consumer investigator (H.L.) who has provided feedback and input at all stages of the research, including grant application, project design, data analysis and manuscript review.
Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry identifier (ANZCTR): 12620000060943
To examine whether manpower and expertise understaffing are distinct, and whether they relate similarly to nursing stressors, burnout, job satisfaction and intentions to turnover.
A cross-sectional survey of hospital nurses nested within units was used.
The sample included 402 nurses. Nurses provided ratings of the study's variables using validated self-report measures. The data were analysed both as multilevel and single-level data.
Manpower and expertise understaffing contributed unique explained variance to all of the examined outcomes. Nurses within the same units experience different understaffing levels. Expertise understaffing emerged as a significantly stronger predictor than manpower understaffing for three of the six of the outcome variables (illegitimate tasks, job satisfaction and turnover intentions).
Manpower and expertise understaffing are distinct, and both are associated with nurse outcomes.
We have adhered to the STROBE guideline for cross-sectional studies.
Considering both manpower and expertise understaffing to maintain proper staffing levels in nursing units is crucial.
A Director of Patient Care Services from the hospital where the study was conducted is a member of the research team. This member contributed to designing and conducting the study as well as interpreting the results.
To explore oncology nursing advance care planning practices and understand how to better support nurses in conducting advance care planning with patients and their families.
Qualitative interpretive descriptive methodology.
Semi-structured, individual telephone or Zoom interviews with 19 oncology nurses in a Western province of Canada between May and August 2022. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, de-identified, and analysed using inductive, thematic, and constant comparative techniques.
Oncology nurses highlighted several factors affecting their ability to engage in advance care planning, including (1) uncertainties related to the nursing role in advance care planning, such as how and when a nurse ought to engage; (2) the educational, experiential, and training environment; and (3) structural barriers, such as a lack of time, space, and privacy; models of care that inhibit nurses from developing longitudinal relationships with their patients; and team dynamics that affect advance care planning interdisciplinary collaboration.
To create environments that support oncology nurses to conduct advance care planning, the findings suggest uncertainties be addressed through a clear and cohesive organisational approach to advance care planning and ongoing, integrated educational opportunities. Further, service delivery models may need to be restructured such that nurses have dedicated time and space for nurse-led advance care planning and opportunities to develop trusting relationships with both patients and their interdisciplinary colleagues.
Oncology nurses recognised the value of advance care planning in supporting patient-centred care and shared decision making, yet they reported limited engagement in advance care planning in their practice. To support oncology nurses in conducting advance care planning, healthcare leaders may address (1) advance care planning-related uncertainties and (2) structural barriers that prevent nurses from engaging in advance care planning with patients and their families. Findings may guide modifications to care models, enhancing support for oncology nurses in conducting advance care planning.
We selected and adhered to the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ) as the most applicable guideline.
No patient or public contribution.
To integrate the quantitative and qualitative data collected as part of the PEACH (Procalcitonin: Evaluation of Antibiotic use in COVID-19 Hospitalised patients) study, which evaluated whether procalcitonin (PCT) testing should be used to guide antibiotic prescribing and safely reduce antibiotic use among patients admitted to acute UK National Health Service (NHS) hospitals.
Triangulation to integrate quantitative and qualitative data.
Four data sources in 148 NHS hospitals in England and Wales including data from 6089 patients.
A triangulation protocol was used to integrate three quantitative data sources (survey, organisation-level data and patient-level data: data sources 1, 2 and 3) and one qualitative data source (clinician interviews: data source 4) collected as part of the PEACH study. Analysis of data sources initially took place independently, and then, key findings for each data source were added to a matrix. A series of interactive discussion meetings took place with quantitative, qualitative and clinical researchers, together with patient and public involvement (PPI) representatives, to group the key findings and produce seven statements relating to the study objectives. Each statement and the key findings related to that statement were considered alongside an assessment of whether there was agreement, partial agreement, dissonance or silence across all four data sources (convergence coding). The matrix was then interpreted to produce a narrative for each statement.
To explore whether PCT testing safely reduced antibiotic use during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Seven statements were produced relating to the PEACH study objective. There was agreement across all four data sources for our first key statement, ‘During the first wave of the pandemic (01/02/2020-30/06/2020), PCT testing reduced antibiotic prescribing’. The second statement was related to this key statement, ‘During the first wave of the pandemic (01/02/2020-30/06/2020), PCT testing safely reduced antibiotic prescribing’. Partial agreement was found between data sources 3 (quantitative patient-level data) and 4 (qualitative clinician interviews). There were no data regarding safety from data sources 1 or 2 (quantitative survey and organisational-level data) to contribute to this statement. For statements three and four, ‘PCT was not used as a central factor influencing antibiotic prescribing’, and ‘PCT testing reduced antibiotic prescribing in the emergency department (ED)/acute medical unit (AMU),’ there was agreement between data source 2 (organisational-level data) and data source 4 (interviews with clinicians). The remaining two data sources (survey and patient-level data) contributed no data on this statement. For statement five, ‘PCT testing reduced antibiotic prescribing in the intensive care unit (ICU)’, there was disagreement between data sources 2 and 3 (organisational-level data and patient-level data) and data source 4 (clinician interviews). Data source 1 (survey) did not provide data on this statement. We therefore assigned dissonance to this statement. For statement six, ‘There were many barriers to implementing PCT testing during the first wave of COVID-19’, there was partial agreement between data source 1 (survey) and data source 4 (clinician interviews) and no data provided by the two remaining data sources (organisational-level data and patient-level data). For statement seven, ‘Local PCT guidelines/protocols were perceived to be valuable’, only data source 4 (clinician interviews) provided data. The clinicians expressed that guidelines were valuable, but as there was no data from the other three data sources, we assigned silence to this statement.
There was agreement between all four data sources on our key finding ‘during the first wave of the pandemic (01/02/2020-30/06/2020), PCT testing reduced antibiotic prescribing’. Data, methodological and investigator triangulation, and a transparent triangulation protocol give validity to this finding.
Nursing students often experience anxiety, stress, and fear during a clinical rotation in a mental health setting due to stressors and biases toward the setting as well as lack experience in caring for patients with mental health conditions. One in four people worldwide suffers from a mental disorder; therefore, it is critical that nurses feel confident interacting with these patients to provide equitable care. Undergraduate training is a critical period for changing students' attitudes toward this population. This study's goal was twofold. First, we offered students’ exposure to common behaviors and symptoms displayed by a patient with mental illness through an engaging and immersive virtual reality simulation experience before taking care of patients in a clinical setting. Second, we aimed to determine if a virtual reality simulation will change students' attitude and stigma, favorably, toward patients with mental health conditions. We used a mixed-method comparative analysis to collect information and identify themes on undergraduate students’ attitudes and stigma toward patients with mental health conditions. Our findings demonstrate that virtual reality simulations enhance awareness and sensitivity to the situations of others (empathy) while improving their communication skills. The use of virtual reality in a baccalaureate curriculum deepens the understanding of health equity in behavioral health for nursing students. 
FreshRSS 