Conectar
Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) is an urgent public health challenge in Namibia, with profound socioeconomic consequences. The high burden of both tuberculosis and HIV complicates treatment and underscores the need for optimised drug therapies. Precision medicine, which leverages patient-specific genetic and molecular information, offers promise for improving MDR-TB outcomes. However, its effective application relies on population-specific data, particularly understanding how individuals metabolise tuberculosis drugs and how genetic diversity drives variability in treatment response. Currently, no pharmacokinetic (PK) or pharmacogenetic (PG) data on TB treatment exist for Namibian populations. This gap is particularly concerning, given the country’s genetic diversity, environmental factors and comorbidities that may uniquely influence drug metabolism. This study aims to generate PK and PG data to inform dose optimisation and support personalised treatment strategies for MDR-TB in Namibia. The findings will contribute to improved patient care and inform health system strengthening based on locally relevant evidence.
This cross-sectional study will consist of 100 Namibian participants with matched human DNA and PK data of MDR-TB cases receiving isoniazid, clofazimine, bedaquiline and the fluoroquinolones (levofloxacin or moxifloxacin). PK sampling will be divided as follows: 30 individuals will undergo intensive PK sampling, while the remaining (n=70) will undergo sparse PK sampling. DNA will be extracted at Stellenbosch University (SU), and samples will be genotyped using the H3Africa microarray. Sequences will be aligned to the human reference genome, hg38 (GRCh38p13), using the freely available Burrows-Wheeler Aligner. A subset of the samples (n=20–30) will undergo whole genome sequencing (WGS) to verify imputation results and identify novel genetic variants potentially affecting PK in this population.
Quality control and variant call format file generation will be performed using the Genome Analysis Toolkit best practices (V.3.5). Intensive and sparse PK data will be pooled for the development of a population PK (popPK) model using a non-linear mixed-effects modelling approach. The popPK model will characterise the relationship between TB drug dose and exposure, including quantifying covariates, including genetic variation, explaining PK variability, providing a foundation for dose optimisation and personalised treatment strategies.
Ethics approval was obtained from the University of Namibia Human Research Ethics Committee for Health (Ref. SOM18/2024), the Ministry of Health and Social Services (Ref. 22/4/2/3), the SU Health Research Ethics Committee (Ref. N21/11/136) and the University of Cape Town Human Research Ethics Committee (Ref. 500/2022).
International guidelines on breast cancer (BC) screening have differing recommendations leading to uncertainty on best practices for primary care providers. The purpose of this study was to create a Canadian best practices document on BC health and screening for primary healthcare providers through multidisciplinary consensus using Nominal Group Technique and Delphi method.
A 9-member multidisciplinary expert group and a patient advocate participated in the consensus methods and voting. Experts included those involved in BC management and two primary care physicians. Twenty-nine experts across BC disciplines participated in external review.
Two study objectives included (1) building consensus on key ‘best practice’ behaviours related to BC-related health and screening and (2) building consensus on specific definitions related to BC screening.
The final consensus document consists of 65 statements grouped in five categories with companion resources to support uptake of all best practices. Categories include identification and work-up for diagnostic imaging, risk factors and identifying individuals eligible for high-risk screening, shared decision-making, decisions and referrals for BC screening and screening outcomes. Special areas of focus were shared decision-making, age to initiate screening, and BC screening in special populations.
We created a comprehensive consensus document distilling the latest evidence to provide practical Canadian consensus-based advice on specific ‘best practice behaviours’ related to BC health and screening to serve as a resource for providers.
To evaluate the effect of mutuality on self-care in people with CHD and the contribution of their caregivers, and whether such relationships can be mediated by self-efficacy.
Secondary analysis of baseline data from a multi-centre longitudinal study.
Patients at the onset of coronary artery disease who underwent angioplasty, along with their caregivers, were included in the sample. Data from 136 patients and 136 caregivers were used for the analysis. Mutuality between patients and caregivers was measured using the Mutuality Scale. Self-care was measured using the Self-Care of Coronary Heart Disease Index and the Caregiver Contribution to Self-Care of Coronary Heart Disease Index. The actor–partner interdependence mediation models were used to assess the mediating role of self-efficacy for self-care between perceived mutuality and self-care behaviours.
An actor indirect effect was found between patient mutuality and their self-care maintenance, self-care monitoring, and self-care management, through the mediation of their self-efficacy. Caregiver mutuality had a positive indirect effect on their contribution to self-care maintenance, self-care monitoring, and self-care management, through the mediation of their self-efficacy. Caregiver mutuality had a positive indirect effect on patient self-care maintenance and on patient self-care monitoring, through the mediation of patient self-efficacy. All models demonstrated satisfactory fit to the data.
Mutuality between patients and caregivers enhances self-care behaviours in patients with coronary heart disease, and self-efficacy is a crucial mediator in this relationship. Interventions targeting both mutuality and self-efficacy within patient–caregiver dyads may improve self-care outcomes.
We adhered to STROBE guidelines.
Patients and members of the public were not involved in the design, conduct, reporting, or dissemination plans of this research.
by Smail Acila, Nora Allioui, Samir Derouiche
Heavy metal contamination poses a significant threat to agricultural productivity. This study investigated the physiological and biochemical responses of Cucurbita pepo seeds to cadmium (Cd) and copper (Cu) stress (100–200 µM) during germination. Although germination rates remained high (86.67–93.33%), seed vigor indices declined significantly under metal stress. Cadmium exhibited stronger growth inhibition, reducing total seedling length by 63.02% at 200 µM, whereas copper primarily affected biomass accumulation, reducing the seedling weight-based vigor index (SVIW) by 40.4%. Biochemical analyses revealed metal-specific impacts on reserve mobilization. Cadmium exposure (200 µM) decreased soluble sugars in cotyledons by 16%, while maintaining protein content at 106% of control levels, indicating inhibition of protein degradation and impaired reserve utilization. In contrast, copper at 100 µM increased cotyledonary sugars by 63%, reflecting its dual role as both a micronutrient and stressor. Principal component analysis confirmed the greater toxicity of Cd, which explained 79.7% of the variance in metabolic disruption. These findings demonstrate that cadmium consistently impairs seedling establishment by disrupting nutrient mobilization pathways, while copper exhibits concentration-dependent effects, being stimulatory at low concentrations but inhibitory at higher levels. This study provides crucial insights into heavy metal phytotoxicity mechanisms and underscores the importance of monitoring metal pollution in agricultural systems to enhance crop resilience.To scope international evidence on educational interventions to support delegation practices of nursing students and newly graduated nurses.
A scoping review was undertaken following the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology, reported using the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis scoping reviews extension (PRISMA-ScR) checklist.
CINAHL, ProQuest, Medline (Ovid), Scopus, EMBASE, Open grey and grey literature, from January 2014 to September 2024 were searched. Studies in English, empirical, evaluative, and available in full text were included.
Eighteen studies were included in this review. Nine papers were evaluative. Fourteen of the papers were American. Educational interventions included role-play, case scenarios and peer learning. Three studies defined delegation, with four aligned to a delegation framework. Three studies were in clinical settings.
This review highlighted heterogeneity in educational interventions to support delegation practices. Gaps in the evidence base were highlighted, limited interventions in the clinical setting, absence of evidence underpinning educational effectiveness and minimal long-term follow up.
Students and new graduate nurses were able to demonstrate learning after an intervention, highlighting the benefit of case studies, peer learning and simulation. However, the long-term impact is unknown. Interventions need to support theory to practice transition. Professional standards, roles, responsibilities and scope of practice need to be incorporated, and educational interventions should occur more than once to support meaningful and ongoing learning.
This scoping review highlighted variation in delegation educational interventions for nursing students and new graduate nurses, with limited interventions in the clinical setting. Knowledge acquisition regarding roles and responsibilities was not always evident within interventions. Given the evolving context of healthcare practice, interventions aligned to professional standards necessitate supporting the acquisition of knowledge regarding roles, responsibilities and scope of practice of healthcare workers registered nurses delegate too.
No Patient or Public Contribution.
To explore the roles and training of advanced practice nurses specialised in acute pain management, as reported in the current literature.
Scoping review.
We searched PubMed, Scopus and CINAHL in December 2023 to identify relevant studies published from 1996.
Relevant literature was identified, screened, and analysed using a structured scoping review process. Two reviewers independently selected and extracted data from eligible studies, with a third reviewer resolving any disagreements.
A total of 1682 records were screened, and 36 studies met the inclusion criteria. Four main themes emerged: job titles, roles, training, and barriers. The review revealed substantial variation in job titles and role descriptions across clinical settings and geographic regions, with more comprehensive role definitions found in countries like the United States and the United Kingdom. Training pathways, including postgraduate qualifications and certification, varied significantly and many low- and middle-income countries lacked structured training frameworks. Barriers identified included regulatory limitations, insufficient educational infrastructure and lack of legal authority to practice.
This review highlights significant international variation in the definition, training and regulation of advanced practice nurses in acute pain management. There is an urgent need to develop global standards, including unified competencies and certification pathways, to ensure consistent and effective care.
Standardising competencies and training will support role recognition, improve consistency in clinical practice and promote high-quality care for individuals experiencing acute pain.
This review addresses the global inconsistency in role definition and training of advanced practice nurses in acute pain management. Findings may inform educators, health professionals, policymakers and regulators, particularly in resource-limited settings.
This review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR).
No patient or public contribution.
(1) To analyse individual and institutional-level factors associated with urinary incontinence in older adults living in nursing homes; (2) to estimate the prevalence of urinary, faecal and double incontinence in nursing home residents.
Cross-sectional study.
Residents aged 65+ living in 22 nursing homes in Catalonia (Spain) were included. Descriptive, bivariate, and multilevel analyses were performed.
The final sample comprised 452 residents (75.9% female, mean age of 87.0 years). The prevalence of urinary, faecal and double incontinence was 77.5%, 46.1% and 45.7%, respectively. Urinary incontinence was statistically significantly associated with neurological conditions, moderate cognitive impairment, moderate dementia, severe cognitive impairment, very severe cognitive impairment and age.
Approximately three out of four nursing home residents suffered from urinary incontinence and almost half of the sample from faecal or double incontinence. Individual-level factors (cognition, neurological conditions and age) played a more important role than institutional-level factors for urinary incontinence.
The findings of this study highlight the importance of individual-level interventions to prevent and manage urinary incontinence in nursing homes.
In Catalonian nursing homes, individual factors such as cognitive impairment and neurological conditions were more strongly associated with urinary incontinence than institutional factors. This has implications for improving care provided to older adults, particularly those with dementia and neurological conditions.
STROBE (Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology) guidelines.
Nursing home residents were not involved in this study.
To analyse the comfort needs of patients following renal transplantation, guided by Kolcaba's Theory of Comfort.
A qualitative design was employed.
This study was conducted at a Brazilian university hospital's renal transplant outpatient clinic. Forty-six post-transplant patients were purposively sampled by age, transplant time and clinic attendance. Face-to-face interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed and conducted using a semi-structured script. Data were analysed through thematic content analysis, guided by Kolcaba's Comfort Theory and relevant literature.
Participant narratives were categorised according to the contexts outlined by Kolcaba's Theory of Comfort: Physical, Environmental, Sociocultural and Psychospiritual. In the physical context, pain was identified as a major factor diminishing comfort after renal transplantation. In the environmental context, elements such as light, odour, sound, temperature and uncomfortable furnishings contributed to discomfort. In the sociocultural context, family support was highlighted as essential. In the psychospiritual context, religiosity played a key role in enhancing the comfort of transplant recipients.
Spirituality, strengthened social support networks and non-pharmacological comfort measures are essential for promoting comfort among patients following renal transplantation. These findings underscore the importance of integrated care approaches that address physical, emotional and social aspects to improve quality of life for this population.
Conceptual models in nursing provide a critical perspective for care and support the delivery of effective, evidence-based interventions. By identifying the multidimensional comfort needs of post-renal transplant patients, this study informs the development of targeted, holistic strategies for nursing and multidisciplinary practice in outpatient settings.
This study examined the multidimensional comfort needs of post-renal transplant patients and found that comfort is shaped by physical, environmental, sociocultural and psychospiritual factors. The results may guide global nursing and multidisciplinary outpatient care by informing integrated approaches that enhance the quality of life of transplant recipients.
This study was reported according to the COREQ framework.
No patient or public contribution.
Although multiple studies have offered self-collection for human papillomavirus (HPV)-based cervical screening in community settings, there are no randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that have compared implementation outcomes of programme approaches for self-collection. This trial will compare two such approaches in low-resource settings in the states of Tamil Nadu and Mizoram, India.
A cluster RCT will be conducted over a year, offering self-collection to 3000 women aged 30–49 from 28 clusters (average size 101) in selected districts. Clusters in tribal, rural and urban low-income settings will be randomised to two arms. The intervention arm, co-designed with multiple stakeholders, will involve campaigns to offer self-collection in the community. The comparison arm will be offered self-collection at the nearest health facilities.
HPV-based cervical screening will be performed at central laboratories using clinically validated screening assays that can identify the highest risk carcinogenic HPV types (Group 1a–c - HPV16/18/31/33/45/52/58, ±35). Ablative treatment will be based on positivity with this extended genotyping triage, while those with any of the lower carcinogenic HPV types (Group 1d - 39, 51, 56, 59, ±35, Groups 2a/b - 66, 68) will undergo further assessment with visual inspection with acetic acid. Outcomes will be evaluated quantitatively and qualitatively using RE-AIM and the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability.
The primary outcome will be percentage of women well-managed (screened and appropriately treated) in both arms, with secondary outcomes including proportion screened, proportion treated, acceptability (willingness to screen, rescreen, and/or recommend to others) to women, community and healthcare providers, adoption (by providers), implementation fidelity, costs, sustainability assessment and systematically identified implementation barriers and facilitators. The reach, effectiveness and acceptability of community-based self-collection and the use of extended genotyping for triage in resource-constrained, hard-to-reach populations will be assessed, with lessons that can inform future statewide and national programmes.
Ethics approval has been obtained from the Institutional Review Board (IRB) and Ethics Committee of the Christian Medical College Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India (IRB Min. No 14314; INTERVEN), the Alfred Hospital Ethics Committee (HREC Ref 80134, Local Reference: project 601/21), Melbourne, Australia, the IARC Ethics Committee (IEC 21-32), Lyon, France, the Salem Polyclinic Institutional Ethics Committee (SPCIEC/2022/June/01/02), Tamil Nadu, India and the Institutional Ethics Committee, Civil Hospital, Aizawl, Mizoram, India (No.B.12018/1/13-CHA(A)/IEC/115). The study is also approved by the State Scientific Advisory Committee, Directorate of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Chennai, Tamil Nadu (R. No. 011575/HEB/A2/2023). The Alfred Hospital Approval, as an authorised Australian ethics committee for national mutual recognition, is recognised and registered with the University of Melbourne Human Research Ethics Committee (2024-25255-57650-1). Written informed consent will be obtained from participants. The results of the trial will be disseminated through a peer-reviewed medical journal, and also through workshops, reports and conferences.
The trial has been registered with the Clinical Trials Registry - India: CTRI/2022/04/042327.
To explore nurse managers' perceptions at first-line, middle and executive levels regarding their transition to first-line management in two divisions of a highly specialised university hospital in Spain.
A qualitative descriptive study.
A purposive sampling technique was employed to conduct four focus groups and two semi-structured interviews with 31 nurse managers across three hierarchical levels in two divisions of a highly specialised university hospital in Spain. Participants included two Chief Nursing Officers, four Nursing Directors and 25 first-line nurse managers. Data were analysed thematically.
Three themes emerged: ‘Bridging the Readiness Gap: Training, Role Clarity, and Institutional Alignment’, revealing the lack of structured transition plans, role ambiguity and gaps in managerial skills, such as human resources, financial management and leadership; ‘Fighting Loneliness: A Common Challenge in Care Management’, highlighting the isolation of first-line nurse managers due to the absence of structured mentorship and peer support; ‘Clinical Expertise as a Cornerstone: The Role of Prior Experience in Nurse Management’, examining how clinical expertise facilitates leadership transitions but also presents challenges, particularly for managers promoted within their teams, where authority negotiation and role redefinition become critical.
Findings underscore the need for structured training and mentorship to address role ambiguity, enhance managerial competencies and support nurse managers' transitions through targeted education.
Structured transition programmes focusing on role clarity, training and institutional alignment can ease transitions, boost leadership confidence and enhance peer collaboration. Providing mentoring and training tailored to first-line nurse managers can improve team dynamics, support professional integration and strengthen organisational cohesion.
Tailored educational interventions are essential in supporting nurse managers' transitions. Structured mentorship and targeted training enhance leadership readiness, adaptability and institutional alignment, strengthening healthcare leadership, efficiency and patient care quality.
No patient or public contribution.
Many researchers conduct a process evaluation alongside an effectiveness trial of a public health intervention to better understand mechanisms behind observed effects. Yet, there is no standardised, scientifically accepted guideline for reporting such process evaluations, which impedes interpretation and comparison of study results. The aim of this project was to develop a consensus-based and expert-based guideline for reporting process evaluations of public health interventions conducted alongside an effectiveness trial.
We conducted an e-Delphi study with a large panel of international experts.
Based on purposive sampling, we invited 137 international experts that had been involved in the design of process evaluations, researchers who published high-profile process evaluations or frameworks, editors of journals that publish process evaluations, and authors of other reporting guidelines.
Based on a literature search, a first draft of the reporting guideline included 32 items, which was proposed to panel members during the first round. Of the invited 137 invited international experts, 73 (53%) participated in at least one round of the e-Delphi study. Participants rated the inclusion and comprehensibility of the proposed items on a 5-point Likert scale and provided comments and suggestions for relevance and definitions of the items. Adjustments to the items and descriptions were proposed to the e-Delphi panel until consensus of ≥67% for each individual item was reached. In total, 64 (88% of 73) completed round 2, and 55 (76% of 73) completed round 3. This resulted in 19 items that are included in the consensus-based process evaluation reporting guideline for public health intervention studies (CONPHES) guideline. The items cover a detailed description of the intervention that is evaluated, the implementation strategies applied, and underlying causal pathways, and the role of the delivery and support team. The guideline also requires describing the evaluation framework and how evaluation outcomes were assessed. Lastly, the guideline includes items on providing a detailed description of applied analyses (both quantitative and qualitative) and measures for assuring quality. The guideline is accompanied by an Explanation and Elaboration document, with a more detailed explanation of each item.
We expect that the CONPHES reporting guideline for process evaluations of public health interventions can improve the reporting of process evaluations of interventions aimed at promoting public health. This can potentially facilitate more effective translation of public health research into practice and contribute to improving both individual and population health outcomes.
by Priscilla Kapombe, Choolwe Jacobs, Mark W. Tenforde, Kashala Kamalonga, Diane Morof, Terrence Lo, Mweene Cheelo, Lloyd Mulenga, Sombo Fwoloshi, Cordilia M. Himwaze, Patrick Musonda, Mpundu Makasa, Jonas Z. Hines
Zambia has achieved improvements in life expectancy among persons living with HIV (PLHIV) because of high antiretroviral therapy (ART) coverage, which should improve survival due to reductions in AIDS-defining conditions. However, recent estimates of the most common causes of death are not widely available. We utilized mortality surveillance data to report on common causes of death among persons with HIV who died in community settings in Zambia. The Zambian Ministry of Health conducted sentinel mortality surveillance of community deaths in 45 hospitals in 33 of 116 districts from January 2020 through December 2023. Verbal autopsies (VA) were conducted through interviews with relatives or close associates of deceased persons using the 2016 World Health Organization tool. HIV status was reported. A probable cause of death was assigned by a validated computer algorithm (InterVA5). We describe the top assigned causes of death stratified by HIV status. Verbal autopsies were conducted for 67,079 community deaths, of which 11,475 (17.1%) were persons with HIV. The mean age at death was 45 years among persons with HIV and 48 years for persons without HIV (T-test pTo examine the association between nurse–patient mutuality (i.e., a good quality of the relationship between the nurse and the patient) and nurse professional quality of life.
A cross-sectional, multi-centre study was conducted across four tertiary hospitals in Italy.
Data collection took place from November 2023 to June 2024, enrolling 517 nurses. Both medical and surgical departments, as well as inpatients and outpatients departments were included. Data were collected on nurses caring for patients with chronic illness. Mutuality was measured with the Nurse–Patient Mutuality in Chronic Illness scale, which includes three dimensions: Developing and Going Beyond, Being a Point of Reference, Deciding and Sharing Care; Professional Quality of Life was measured with the Professional Quality of Life version 5, which includes three dimensions: Compassion Satisfaction, Secondary Traumatic Stress, Burnout. A Bayesian path analysis was employed to evaluate the contribution of mutuality dimensions to the dimensions of professional quality of life.
Nurses' sample consisted of 517 participants. The three dimensions of mutuality showed different associations with the three dimensions of professional quality of life. Specifically, Being a Point of Reference, along with Deciding and Sharing Care, was significantly associated with Compassion Satisfaction. The dimensions Developing and Going Beyond and Deciding and Sharing Care were significantly and negatively associated with Secondary Traumatic Stress. Additionally, Deciding and Sharing Care was significantly and negatively associated with Burnout.
As all the dimensions of mutuality were significantly associated with different aspects of professional quality of life, future interventions to improve nurses' professional quality of life may also consider nurse–patient mutuality.
Nurse–patient mutuality may be a novel area of research to enhance nurses' professional quality of life, with implications for clinical practice and organisational development.
Nurse–patient mutuality is a key indicator of a high-quality relationship, enabling shared goals and shared decision-making. Nurses' professional quality of life is one of the most important factors that influence their intention to leave. Little is known about the association between nurse–patient mutuality and nurses' professional quality of life. Mutuality influences nurses' and patients' outcomes. Understanding mutuality could enhance the professional quality of life for nurses, improving their compassion satisfaction and reducing their burnout.
We adhered to STROBE guidelines.
Patients were not included in the sample. Health workers were involved in the study.
by Allison Anbari, Zachary Massey, Abigail Adediran, Na Wang, LaRissa Lawrie, Priscilla Martinez, Denis McCarthy
Alcohol consumption increases breast cancer risk. We evaluated the responses of 748 United States female participants ages 21–29 to health warning messages addressing the relationship between alcohol consumption and increased breast cancer risk. In an online experiment, participants were randomly assigned to view standalone health warning messages about alcohol, breast cancer, and breast cancer health effects with varying picture and text attributes. Participants then completed post-message exposure assessments that included an immediate open-ended response to the message prompt. We conducted a qualitative content analysis of the responses and coded deductively based on constructs from the Message Impact Framework including message reactions, attitudes and beliefs, and behavioral intentions. These constructs and corresponding variables were present in participants’ responses. Response type did not vary by participants’ demographics or the attributes of the health warning message they viewed. The code new information was applied to 20% of the responses, indicating that those participants had no prior knowledge of alcohol and breast cancer risk. Alcohol and breast cancer messaging could impact drinking behaviors. Given the frequency of responses indicating a lack of awareness, more work in cancer prevention and population health messaging is warranted.To explore the barriers and facilitators in adherence to the guidelines in the management of benign paroxysmal positional vertigo from the perspective of primary care physicians.
Qualitative study using focus groups.
L’Hospitalet del Llobregat (Barcelona), Spain.
Qualitative study using focus groups. Structured 90 min focus groups were conducted until data saturation was reached. Each session included a moderator and an observer from the research team. Sessions were transcribed and thematically analysed by three independent researchers.
Purposeful sampling was used to form four groups of 4–10 participants, selected by sex, age, years of experience and primary care team (PCT). Participants were recruited between January and February 2023.
A total of 34 family physicians belonging to four PCTs participated in the study. The main barriers identified were a lack of time, negative initial experiences, a fear of harming patients (especially older adults), difficulty in nystagmus visualisation and challenges in managing patient expectations, as many preferred medication over physical manoeuvres. Facilitators included potential time savings from effective early management, the value of initial practical training with periodic refreshers, access to expert consultants for case discussions and the availability of digital tools, such as tutorials, videos and aids for nystagmus interpretation.
Health systems should invest in protected time for history-taking and physical examination, and in regular, updated training for primary care professionals. This could improve vertigo management and reduce unnecessary investigations and medications, ultimately benefiting both patients and the healthcare system.
To assess maternal medical conditions, physical and surgical ailments, contraceptive use and barriers to its use, maternal mental health, neonatal health, breastfeeding practices and available social support in the postpartum period.
A prospective cohort study.
A large tertiary care centre.
12 245 women who delivered after 22 weeks gestation in the year 2022.
Three pre-specified exposures, namely mode of delivery, presence of significant risk factors and preterm delivery within the cohort, were used to identify potential groups of women who would need additional support.
The primary outcome was the number of unscheduled visits by the mother or child and the indications for these visits.
The secondary outcomes in mothers included unhealed wound sites, anaemia, increase in body mass index (BMI) by >3, persistent high blood pressure, pain in the abdomen or pelvis, urinary or bowel problems, musculoskeletal pain, abnormal maternal mental health, breast-related issues and barriers to breastfeeding, contraceptive use and sexual activity.
Only 2% of women and children were lost to follow-up. Nine women and 75 babies died. The majority of infant deaths were related to serious congenital diseases. Unscheduled visits to the health facility were seen in 44% of the cohort, most commonly for upper respiratory infections and fever in the mother and baby. 41 mothers and 741 infants needed admission to hospital. Hospitalisation was more common in those with risk factors or preterm delivery. High blood pressure was seen in 3 to 4% and anaemia in 4% of the cohort. Wound infection was seen in 3 to 4% and urinary incontinence in 2% of women. Wound infection was more common with instrumental delivery. Bowel incontinence was rare. A fourth of the cohort had musculoskeletal pain, especially back pain, which was more common after caesarean delivery. Only 5.5% of the cohort had unsatisfactory mental health, and these women were more likely to have abnormal mental health scores with the NICE Questionnaire at screening. The family APGAR of the cohort was 9/10, and 95% belonged to the middle-income group. 2.6% of neonates had delayed milestones, and this was more common in the group with risk factors and preterm delivery.
Healthcare utilisation was mainly for minor complaints. Re-admissions were rare, as intrapartum and immediate postpartum care were optimal. Women who delivered by caesarean section or delivered a preterm child needed additional support in the postpartum phase. NICE Questionnaire is a quick and easy screening tool to identify unsatisfactory mental health and should be used before discharge, postnatally, even in busy settings. The implementation of formal telephonic support 24 hours a day in birthing facilities should be explored in the future. Holistic postnatal care of mother and child during the immunisation of the baby would be the best opportunity to improve the quality and coverage of care in the postnatal phase.
CTRI/2022/03/041343.
The study aims to explore the experiences of Black Canadian parents following a preterm birth and their perspectives of being in the NICU.
A qualitative design guided by principles of community engagement was used to explore the experiences of Black Canadian parents.
Focus groups and in-depth interviews were conducted with 40 Black parents of preterm infants. A thematic analysis approach was used to organize the data into meaningful themes.
Five major themes were identified through the data analysis: encountering racism and discrimination in the NICU, bearing the emotional weight of staying in the NICU, enduring the feeling of bodily betrayal and guilt, grappling with the turmoil of uncertainty and seeking peer and mental health support programs.
This study provides in-depth understanding of the unique experiences of Black Canadian parents after a preterm birth and the challenges they face navigating the NICU.
Developing a targeted training program for health care providers is critical to address racism and discriminatory practices and enhance parents' sense of belonging in the NICU. Creating Black-focused peer support and accessible mental health care during and after the NICU is critical to address the gaps in programs and services and to promote effective coping.
Addressing racism and discriminatory practice requires urgent attention to promote equity within the NICU environment. Scaling up access to Black peer support and mental health programs will contribute to improving parental wellbeing in Canada and beyond.
This study was in partnership with the Canadian Premature Babies Foundation, our community collaborator.
by Maria Cecilia Rasuk, Alfonsina Palladini, Andrea Moyano, Viviana Díaz, Antonella Giudice, Gisela Castillo, Solana Abraham, Juan Rull, Anja Poehlein, Rolf Daniel, Julian Rafael Dib
The Mediterranean fruit fly (Ceratitis capitata Wied.) is an agricultural pest of significant economic importance. This species has been globally managed using the Sterile Insect Technique (SIT). Insects, including tephritid flies, harbor a diverse gut microbiota that plays critical roles in their physiology, behavior, and overall fitness, suggesting that microbial communities may profoundly influence the biology of this pest. The aim of this study was to characterize the fungal and bacterial gut microbial communities of C. capitata from Tucumán, Argentina, and to assess their response to antimicrobial treatment using amplicon-based 16S rRNA gene and ITS region sequencing. Both control and treated flies were dominated by Proteobacteria (bacteria) and Zygosaccharomyces (fungi). Antimicrobial treatment induced significant shifts in bacterial and fungal composition, reducing diversity and altering gut community structure. Untreated flies exhibited a diverse and structured bacterial gut community dominated by the family Enterobacteriaceae, while antibiotic-treated communities were dominated by Rhizobiaceae. Despite these shifts, fungal communities in both treated and untreated groups were consistently dominated by the genus Zygosaccharomyces. Functional predictions revealed notable changes in metabolic pathways following antibiotic treatment, including increased gene abundance for ABC transporters and the phosphotransferase system, and decreased representation of genes involved in antibiotic biosynthesis and two-component systems. These results indicate significant alterations in bacterial metabolism and stress response mechanisms induced by the treatment. Such changes may help explain the underperformance of irradiated, mass-reared males within the context of SIT. This study provides new insights into the structural and functional dynamics of the C. capitata gut microbiome under disturbance. These findings have implications for understanding the ecological roles of microbial communities in this pest and their potential impact on fly health and fitness. Identification of dominant gut bacterial and fungal groups may support the development of probiotic diets, enhancing the efficiency of SIT application.Dementia is a chronic and progressive neurological condition characterised by cognitive and functional impairment. It is often associated with multimorbidity and imposes a significant economic burden on healthcare systems and families, especially in low-income and middle-income countries. In Peru, where dementia cases are increasing rapidly, timely detection and referral for diagnosis is crucial. This protocol is part of the IMPACT Salud project in Peru. Here, we focus on a specific component aimed at validating an mHealth tool for the detection of cognitive and functional impairment and assessing its cost-effectiveness. We will also assess changes in cognitive and functional impairment as well as health economic outcomes over 1 year.
This observational study will be conducted in four geographically diverse regions of Peru. Community health workers are expected to contact approximately 32 000 participants (≥60 years) to apply an mHealth-enabled tool that includes cognitive and functional instruments: Ascertain Dementia 8, Peruvian version of Rowland Universal Dementia Assessment Scale and Pfeffer Functional Activities Questionnaire. From this large sample, we aim to find 3600 participants and their study partners to enrol and interview at baseline regarding sociodemographic characteristics, lifestyles, comorbidities and health economic data including resource use, costs and health-related quality of life (HR-QoL). Psychologists, blind to previous results, will assess dementia stage of the participants using an abbreviated Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) scale. At 6-month follow-up, participants will complete a brief health economics questionnaire on resource use, costs and HR-QoL. To validate the accuracy of the detection tool, a subsample of 600 participants who completed the baseline will undergo a gold-standard clinical neuropsychological assessment. This subsample will participate in a 12-month follow-up, including health economics, cognitive and functional impairment tests and the CDR scale. Results will be analysed and presented by cognitive status, site, sex and multimorbidity profile. Finally, data from all stages and external sources will inform a decision model to implement a cost-effectiveness analysis of the detection tool at the national level.
The study received ethics approval in Peru (Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia: CONSTANCIA-CIEI-378-33-23) and in the UK (Imperial College London: ICREC/SETREC reference number 6647445). Informed consent will be obtained from participants and their study partners, considering the participant’s capacity to consent. For illiterate participants, consent will be obtained through a witnessed procedure involving study partners, with a fingerprint obtained instead of a signature. The results will be disseminated through conferences, published articles, public presentations (particularly to those involved in dementia care) and presentations or meetings with local health authorities.
The aim of this study was to document the process of the implementation and the perceived impact and sustainability of the Expansive Learning in Practice Model and its associated costs to inform future rollout.
A mixed-method rapid evaluation was conducted, comprising both qualitative and economic workstreams to document the implementation of the Expansive Learning in Practice Model and its associated costs. Semi-structured interviews (n = 44) were carried out with student nurses, student assessors, and staff involved in the delivery of the Model. The qualitative workstream utilised a rapid cycle evaluation approach, where data were collected and analysed in parallel, and preliminary findings were shared with stakeholders as the study was ongoing. The quantitative workstream relied on routinely collected data about non-staff-related costs, staff-related costs, and data on students' participation.
The main themes developed from the qualitative data included the organisation of the Expansive Learning Experiences, the supportive environment, the enhanced learning experience, and capacity building. Participants perceived that the model had a positive impact on student practice (including preparation and confidence) and on student nurse satisfaction. At the end of the programme, it is estimated that the programme will have cost about £523,572.
This model can be used as a framework for hospitals aiming to improve the learning experiences for student nurses. Improvements could be made by increasing staff buy-in and the streamlining of spoke opportunities. Future studies should focus on evaluating the long-term impact of the model, particularly the impact on generating student placement capacity. The evaluation also highlights the need for solutions for potential educational staff shortages, which could pose a risk to maintaining sufficient practice placement capacity for student nurses in healthcare settings.
Study participants perceived an improvement in student nurses' learning experiences and student nurse placement capacity as a result of the implementation of this model.
The relevant EQUATOR guidelines followed for reporting were the GRAMM guidelines (Good Reporting of a Mixed Methods Study).
The study centred around student nurse and staff experiences.
FreshRSS 