To determine the prevalence of potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP), potentially inappropriate medication (PIM), potential prescription omission (PPO), potentially harmful drug–drug interactions (PDDI) and identify associated factors among older Ethiopians.

Systematic review and meta-analysis

We searched PubMed, HINARI, Scopus and Web of Science databases to identify eligible studies published up to 31 October 2025.

Observational studies reported the prevalence of PIP, PIM, PPO and PDDI among older adults from any healthcare settings were screened.

Two independent reviewers selected studies, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias. The quality and risk of bias of the studies were assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale and Hoy risk of bias tool, respectively, while the certainty of evidence of outcomes was assessed using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation based on Cochrane recommendations. We used a random-effects model for analyses to estimate the pooled prevalence and associated factors. All data analyses were done using Stata V.17 software.

The national prevalence of PIP, PIM, PPO and PDDI was estimated as main outcomes. Variations were estimated based on regions, age groups, outcome evaluation tool, disease type and healthcare setting.

The review included 25 studies (n=5662 participants) for PIP or PIM, 14 studies (n=2706 participants) for PDDI and 6 studies (n=1342 participants) for PPO. The pooled prevalence estimate was 41% (95% CI 33% to 48%), I²=96.87% for PIP, 37% (95% CI 31% to 44%), I²=96.33% for PIM, 55% (95% CI 36% to 73%), I²=99.00% for PDDI and 14% (95% CI 6% to 24%), I²=95.07% for PPO. The majority of the studies have very good quality (very good=13, good=1, satisfactory=11 for PIP and PIM; very good=11, satisfactory=3 for PDDI; very good=6 for PPO) and low risk of bias (low risk=18, moderate risk=7 for PIP and PIM; low risk=12, moderate risk=2 for PDDI and low risk=6 for PPO), while all studies for each outcome have low certainty of evidence. Subgroup analyses revealed significant regional and contextual variations. Polypharmacy was significantly associated with PIP (OR=3.72, 95% CI 2.53 to 5.46, p2=69.56%), PIM (OR=4.20, 95% CI 2.91 to 6.06, p2=57.83%) and PDDI (OR=4.51, 95% CI 3.05 to 6.69, p2=0.00%), while hypertension (OR=2.46, 95% CI 1.38 to 4.36, p2=0.00%) was associated with PIP.

This review found a high prevalence of PIP, PIM, PDDI and PPO among older adults in Ethiopia, with notable heterogeneity across regions. Polypharmacy was associated with PIP, PIM and PDDI, while hypertension showed association with PIP. Despite generally good study quality, the certainty of evidence was low for the included studies due to the cross-sectional design nature, with high heterogeneity. Therefore, these findings should be interpreted cautiously. This study indicates a high burden of inappropriate medication prescribing and its associated factors, underscoring the importance of further robust studies to clarify prescribing practices and associated factors.

CRD42024556744.

Young children and children living with HIV are at high risk of progressing to tuberculosis (TB) disease following Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) exposure and infection, and also of developing severe forms of disease and TB-related mortality. Identifying children who have very early (sub-clinical) TB disease, prior to progression to clinically apparent TB, would mean that TB preventive treatment (TPT) could be more efficiently targeted to this group. Identifying biomarker changes on drug therapy in children with Mtb infection or very early disease could pave the way for the development of tests that can identify which children have viable bacilli and are therefore at increased risk of disease progression.

The INTREPID study will use already collected samples taken from well-phenotyped paediatric cohorts in three clinical studies conducted in South Africa in children Mtb exposure to disease and from children treated for Mtb infection and early TB disease, as well as targeted Mtb antibody analysis. Data on viral co-infections and relevant clinical and epidemiological parameters will be integrated and evaluated to identify the optimal biosignatures that can predict future progression to clinically overt disease in children below 5 years of age, including those living with HIV.

The study protocol received ethical approval from the Stellenbosch University Health Research Ethics Committee (N23/03/025). The study findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, scientific conferences and formal presentations to healthcare professionals and to local communities, in collaboration with the Desmond Tutu TB Centre Community Advisory Board.

Although multiple studies have offered self-collection for human papillomavirus (HPV)-based cervical screening in community settings, there are no randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that have compared implementation outcomes of programme approaches for self-collection. This trial will compare two such approaches in low-resource settings in the states of Tamil Nadu and Mizoram, India.

A cluster RCT will be conducted over a year, offering self-collection to 3000 women aged 30–49 from 28 clusters (average size 101) in selected districts. Clusters in tribal, rural and urban low-income settings will be randomised to two arms. The intervention arm, co-designed with multiple stakeholders, will involve campaigns to offer self-collection in the community. The comparison arm will be offered self-collection at the nearest health facilities.

HPV-based cervical screening will be performed at central laboratories using clinically validated screening assays that can identify the highest risk carcinogenic HPV types (Group 1a–c - HPV16/18/31/33/45/52/58, ±35). Ablative treatment will be based on positivity with this extended genotyping triage, while those with any of the lower carcinogenic HPV types (Group 1d - 39, 51, 56, 59, ±35, Groups 2a/b - 66, 68) will undergo further assessment with visual inspection with acetic acid. Outcomes will be evaluated quantitatively and qualitatively using RE-AIM and the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability.

The primary outcome will be percentage of women well-managed (screened and appropriately treated) in both arms, with secondary outcomes including proportion screened, proportion treated, acceptability (willingness to screen, rescreen, and/or recommend to others) to women, community and healthcare providers, adoption (by providers), implementation fidelity, costs, sustainability assessment and systematically identified implementation barriers and facilitators. The reach, effectiveness and acceptability of community-based self-collection and the use of extended genotyping for triage in resource-constrained, hard-to-reach populations will be assessed, with lessons that can inform future statewide and national programmes.

Ethics approval has been obtained from the Institutional Review Board (IRB) and Ethics Committee of the Christian Medical College Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India (IRB Min. No 14314; INTERVEN), the Alfred Hospital Ethics Committee (HREC Ref 80134, Local Reference: project 601/21), Melbourne, Australia, the IARC Ethics Committee (IEC 21-32), Lyon, France, the Salem Polyclinic Institutional Ethics Committee (SPCIEC/2022/June/01/02), Tamil Nadu, India and the Institutional Ethics Committee, Civil Hospital, Aizawl, Mizoram, India (No.B.12018/1/13-CHA(A)/IEC/115). The study is also approved by the State Scientific Advisory Committee, Directorate of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Chennai, Tamil Nadu (R. No. 011575/HEB/A2/2023). The Alfred Hospital Approval, as an authorised Australian ethics committee for national mutual recognition, is recognised and registered with the University of Melbourne Human Research Ethics Committee (2024-25255-57650-1). Written informed consent will be obtained from participants. The results of the trial will be disseminated through a peer-reviewed medical journal, and also through workshops, reports and conferences.

The trial has been registered with the Clinical Trials Registry - India: CTRI/2022/04/042327.

Implementation science (IS) is increasingly recognised as vital in cancer control planning and integrating evidence-based interventions across the cancer care continuum. Contextual differences often cause variability in delivering optimised healthcare, which IS approaches could mitigate. While IS improves planning effectiveness, many programme and policy planners remain unaware of its benefits. To address this, we examined IS theories applied to national cancer control plans (NCCPs)/strategies across five domains: stakeholder engagement, situational analysis, capacity assessment, economic evaluation and impact assessment.

We conducted a scoping review using the Arksey and O’Malley framework to analyse NCCPs and strategies from 16 and 17 countries belonging to low and medium categories of Human Development Index (HDI), focusing on resource-constrained settings. We identified plans through the International Cancer Control Partnership portal, categorised them by WHO region and included only those available in English or French. We extracted data into a Microsoft Excel database and performed thematic analysis across five IS domains. Multiple IS experts, selected purposively based on their familiarity with resource-constrained settings, validated the findings, assessed policy relevance and helped develop a pathway for integrating IS into national cancer control planning. They reviewed structured questions in advance and provided feedback on analyses, practical utility, dissemination and simplifying IS application, which was used to refine the pathway and reach consensus.

While many NCCPs incorporated key IS elements such as stakeholder engagement, situational analysis and impact measurement, these often needed to be more explicit and consistently applied. None of the plans assessed health system capacity to determine readiness for implementing new interventions. Although most plans described stakeholder engagement, it was typically unstructured and incomplete. Four low HDI and nine medium HDI countries included costed plans, generally using an activity-based approach. All plans included impact measures (eg, key performance indicators), but five lacked mechanisms for engaging stakeholders or responsible entities to achieve the targets. These findings informed a proposed pathway to integrate IS principles into cancer control planning.

Integrating IS into national cancer control planning offers a structured framework for achieving equitable and feasible cancer control policies, particularly in resource-constrained settings, by enabling realistic goal setting and benchmarking against regional and global standards.