International guidelines on breast cancer (BC) screening have differing recommendations leading to uncertainty on best practices for primary care providers. The purpose of this study was to create a Canadian best practices document on BC health and screening for primary healthcare providers through multidisciplinary consensus using Nominal Group Technique and Delphi method.

A 9-member multidisciplinary expert group and a patient advocate participated in the consensus methods and voting. Experts included those involved in BC management and two primary care physicians. Twenty-nine experts across BC disciplines participated in external review.

Two study objectives included (1) building consensus on key ‘best practice’ behaviours related to BC-related health and screening and (2) building consensus on specific definitions related to BC screening.

The final consensus document consists of 65 statements grouped in five categories with companion resources to support uptake of all best practices. Categories include identification and work-up for diagnostic imaging, risk factors and identifying individuals eligible for high-risk screening, shared decision-making, decisions and referrals for BC screening and screening outcomes. Special areas of focus were shared decision-making, age to initiate screening, and BC screening in special populations.

We created a comprehensive consensus document distilling the latest evidence to provide practical Canadian consensus-based advice on specific ‘best practice behaviours’ related to BC health and screening to serve as a resource for providers.

Large differences exist in chronic kidney disease (CKD) rates between countries, but differences within diverse populations living in the same setting with universal healthcare are not well understood.

To compare dialysis prevalence, CKD risk factors and control, and CKD progression by ethnicity and birth country in an ethnoculturally diverse setting with high rates of kidney disease and universal healthcare.

Scarborough, Toronto’s most diverse region and site of Canada’s largest regional dialysis programme.

Double observational cohort study of 2397 participants: a retrospective cohort of 1116 residents who received dialysis between 2016–2019, and a prospective cohort of 1281 individuals with non-dialysis CKD followed for 3 years between 2010–2015 in Scarborough.

Dialysis prevalence, calculated by comparing frequencies of birth countries and ethnicities in the dialysis cohort with census-derived community frequencies. Secondary outcome measurements were traditional CKD risk factor prevalence (diabetes, hypertension, cardiovascular disease) and control (haemoglobin A1c, blood pressure); and CKD progression (estimated glomerular filtration rate decline, proteinuria) adjusted for socioeconomic status in the non-dialysis cohort.

Dialysis prevalence was 4.2 times higher in immigrants (p

Despite universal healthcare access, marked disparities in CKD risks and rates exist within ethnoculturally diverse immigrants living in this Canadian kidney disease hotspot. More focused research and tailored interventions are required.