Conectar
Venous leg ulcers occur due to chronic venous insufficiency in the lower extremities and are often difficult to heal. Platelet-rich plasma and platelet-rich fibrin are products that contain high concentrations of platelets. This systematic review evaluated the effectiveness, safety and cost-effectiveness of these products for the treatment of venous leg ulcers. Guided by the 2020 Joanna Briggs Institute systematic review of effectiveness guideline, this review included original studies that investigated platelet-rich plasma and platelet-rich fibrin in the treatment of venous leg ulcers from databases including the Cochrane Library, Embase, Medline, CINAHL, PubMed, World Health Organisation International Clinical Trials Registry, Clinical Trials.gov and Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry. Methodological quality was assessed using relevant appraisal checklists. Information related to general characteristics of included articles and relevant outcomes of interest were extracted and synthesised narratively. Of thirty-six eligible studies, 24 studies used platelet-rich plasma, eleven investigated fibrin-rich plasma and one study used both platelet-rich plasma and fibrin-rich. Most studies reported these products were effective in promoting wound healing, reducing other symptoms, and were safe to use. The use of platelet-rich plasma and platelet-rich fibrin resulted in significantly higher healed venous leg ulcers compared to control using conventional treatment (RR: 2.93, 95% CI, 1.90–4.53, p = 0.01). These products were safe to used topically and promoted to wound healing, reduced pain, either along or combined with other treatments. Platelet-rich plasma and fibrin-rich plasma improves wound healing and appears to be safe to use in the treatment of venous leg ulcers.
To evaluate the accuracy of the arterial oxygen partial pressure/inspired oxygen fraction (PaO2/FiO2) ratio in predicting mortality among acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients in Vietnam.
A retrospective observational study.
A central hospital in Vietnam.
Adult patients diagnosed with ARDS based on the Berlin definition and admitted to Bach Mai Hospital between August 2015 and August 2023. ARDS severity was converted from descriptive categories to the Berlin score, ranging from 1 (PaO2/FiO2>300 mm Hg) to 4 (PaO2/FiO2≤100 mm Hg).
All-cause hospital mortality.
Of 345 patients, 67.5% were male, and the median age was 55.0 years (IQR: 39.0–66.0). Hospital mortality was 61.2% (211/345). On the first day of admission, the PaO2/FiO2 ratio (areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROC): 0.585 (95% CI 0.522 to 0.649)) showed limited predictive ability for hospital mortality. Incorporating the PaO2/FiO2 ratio into the Berlin score did not substantially improve accuracy (AUROC: 0.578 (95% CI 0.516 to 0.641)). Both measures were less accurate than Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) (AUROC: 0.650 (95% CI 0.590 to 0.711)), Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) (AUROC: 0.685 (95% CI 0.628 to 0.742)) and Confusion, Urea >7 mmol/L (20 mg/dL), Respiratory rate ≥30 breaths/min, Blood pressure (systolic 2/FiO2 values (adjusted OR, AOR: 0.988 (95% CI 0.979 to 0.996)) were independently associated with lower mortality risk, while higher Berlin (AOR: 2.477 (95% CI 1.190 to 5.156)), SOFA (AOR: 1.278 (95% CI 1.102 to 1.482)), APACHE II (AOR: 1.236 (95% CI 1.108 to 1.379)) and CURB-65 (AOR: 7.142 (95% CI 2.581 to 19.763)) scores were associated with increased mortality risk.
In this study of ARDS patients in Vietnam, the PaO2/FiO2 ratio demonstrated limited discriminatory ability for hospital mortality, and incorporating it into the Berlin score did not meaningfully improve performance. While less accurate than SOFA, APACHE II and CURB-65 scores, the PaO2/FiO2 ratio and Berlin score remained independently associated with mortality risk. These findings should be interpreted cautiously, given the retrospective design, single-centre setting and potential selection bias; further validation in larger, multicentre studies is warranted.
Introducción: La Inseguridad Alimentaria (IA), vinculada a la pobreza, favorece el consumo de alimentos poco nutritivos y aumenta el riesgo de enfermedades crónicas. Su comprensión es clave en enfermería comunitaria y escolar para fomentar hábitos saludables desde edades tempranas. Objetivo: Analizar la relación entre el Nivel Socioeconómico (NSE) e IA en Estudiantes de Una Universidad Pública del Norte de Sinaloa, México. Metodología: Estudio cuantitativo, descriptivo, correlacional y transversal en estudiantes de 18 a 25 años inscritos en un programa de Licenciatura. Los participantes fueron seleccionados a partir de un muestreo aleatorio simple. La muestra fue de 311 estudiantes. Se aplicó una cédula de datos sociodemográficos, el cuestionario AMAI y la Escala Latinoamericana y Caribeña de Inseguridad Alimentaria. Resultados: En los hogares sin presencia de menores, la IA severa presenta mayor prevalencia en NSE medio (29,6%) y alto (32,5%). Se observó una correlación positiva y significativa entre el NSE y la IA, tanto en hogares sin integrantes menores de edad (rs = 0,263, p < 0,01), como en aquellos con menores (rs = 0,231, p < 0,01). Conclusiones: En esta población de estudiantes universitarios, se observó que a medida que aumenta el NSE, también lo hace la IA, lo que sugiere que esta no es exclusiva de los sectores socioeconómicos bajos, sino que también afecta de forma considerable a los niveles medio y alto. La persistencia de esta problemática en todos los niveles sugiere que factores estructurales, más allá del ingreso, como el acceso a alimentos nutritivos, educación alimentaria y estabilidad laboral, podrían influir significativamente.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Food insecurity (FI), linked to poverty, promotes the consumption of unhealthy foods and increases the risk of chronic diseases. Understanding it is key in community and school nursing to foster healthy habits from an early age. Objective: To analyze the relationship between socioeconomic status (SES) and FI in students at a public university in Northern Sinaloa, Mexico. Methodology: A quantitative, descriptive, correlational, and cross-sectional study was conducted with students aged 18 to 25 years enrolled in an undergraduate program. Participants were selected using simple random sampling. The sample consisted of 311 students. A sociodemographic data form, the AMAI questionnaire, and the Latin American and Caribbean Food Insecurity Scale were administered. Results: In households without children, severe FI was more prevalent in middle (29.6%) and high (32.5%) SES groups. A positive and significant correlation was observed between socioeconomic status (SES) and food insecurity (FI), both in households without minor members (rs = 0.263, p < 0.01) and in those with minors (rs = 0.231, p < 0.01). Conclusions: In this population of university students, it was observed that as SES increases, so does FI, suggesting that it is not exclusive to low socioeconomic sectors, but also significantly affects middle and high levels. The persistence of this problem at all levels suggests that structural factors, beyond income, such as access to nutritious food, nutrition education, and job stability, could have a significant influence.
Phasix mesh is a fully resorbable synthetic mesh for use in clean and contaminated ventral incisional hernia repairs. Long-term absorbable Phasix mesh appears to be a safe and promising device in incisional hernia repair, with low recurrence rates; however, data on long-term complications after surgery, particularly after the resorption period of the mesh, are scarce.
This protocol describes a study of several European registries on the use of a Phasix mesh in incisional hernia repair. The primary endpoint of the study is long-term complications at 2–5 year follow-up after mesh implantation, with secondary endpoints including hernia recurrence and complications during short-term follow-up.
Ethical approval was not required for this protocol as the study is based on anonymised registry data collected with prior patient consent in each registry. Each participating registry has its own ethical approval process, and this study will adhere to those regulations. The results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations.
Pathology of the long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT) frequently accompanies rotator cuff tears, with tenotomy and tenodesis often being used to address this pathology. While meta-analyses report comparable functional outcomes between these techniques, tenotomy is linked to higher rates of Popeye deformity, whereas tenodesis is more technically demanding and might involve extra material. A novel self-locking tenodesis technique aims to reduce deformity risk while being a simpler alternative to the conventional tenodesis procedure; however, comparative evidence is currently limited.
This single-centre, patient-blinded randomised controlled trial will enrol 100 patients aged ≥40 years with reparable, non-traumatic, full-thickness supraspinatus and/or infraspinatus and/or subscapularis tendon tears undergoing arthroscopic repair from January 2025 until January 2027. Key exclusion criteria include massive or irreparable tears, advanced glenohumeral osteoarthritis and prior shoulder surgery. Participants will be randomised to either 360 double lasso loop tenodesis or self-locking tenodesis. The primary outcome is the Constant score at 1 year, with a predefined non-inferiority margin of 10 points. Secondary outcomes include American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, simple shoulder value score, LHB score, cosmetic appearance, pain scores and radiographic tendon migration. Statistical non-inferiority will be assessed using a one-sided t-test.
The study protocol received approval from the National Ethical Review Board in France (CPP Sud-Est V) and was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov. The results will be disseminated through publication in a peer-reviewed journal.
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are essential for evidence-based nursing care. However, the quality of reporting and adherence to methodological standards in Latin American nursing journals remains unclear. This study evaluates the characteristics, reporting quality, and potential risk of bias of RCTs published in Latin American nursing journals.
To assess the reporting compliance and risk of bias of RCTs published in Latin American nursing journals.
Meta-research study.
A comprehensive handsearch of 29 Latin American nursing journals was performed covering publications from 2000 to 2024. Identified RCTs were assessed for adherence to CONSORT reporting guidelines and evaluated for risk of bias. Outcomes were classified using the COMET taxonomy. A descriptive analysis was performed.
A total of 6377 references were screened, identifying 34 eligible RCTs, most published after 2018. The median CONSORT compliance was 19 reported items (IQR 16–22). High compliance (> 90%) was observed in abstract reporting items, study objectives, and participant selection criteria. However, critical methodological features such as randomization procedures, blinding, and protocol registration showed low adherence (< 40%). Risk of bias was mostly rated as having “some concerns”, largely due to insufficient reporting. According to the COMET taxonomy, the most frequently reported outcome domains were “Delivery of care” and “Physical functioning”.
Reporting compliance and risk of bias of RCTs published in Latin American nursing journals presents significant gaps, particularly in key methodological domains. These shortcomings hinder transparency, reproducibility, and integration into evidence synthesis. Strengthening editorial policies and enforcing reporting standards could enhance the quality and reliability of published research in Latin American nursing journals.
Adolescence is a transitional period marked by psychosocial changes that can impact well-being. Mental disorders before university are linked to dropout and lower employment rates, affecting long-term outcomes. This study examines the psychological well-being of Italian students aged 18–25, exploring factors related to distress.
Cross-sectional survey.
High schools and university in Verona, northern Italy.
A total of 1766 students (88.96% university students and 11.04% high school students in their final year) were recruited. Inclusion criteria were being enrolled in high school or university in Verona, aged 18–25, with adequate Italian language proficiency and informed consent. No exclusion criteria were applied.
Primary outcomes were levels of psychological distress (Kessler Psychological Distress Scale-10-item - Kessler-10), anxiety and depression (Patient Health Questionnaire Anxiety and Depression Scale - PHQ-ADS) and well-being (WHO-Five Well-Being Index - WHO-5). Secondary analyses examined the association of these outcomes with sociodemographic and educational variables.
Most participants (88.6%) reported psychological distress (mean K-10=22.95, SD=6.64). Mild symptoms of anxiety and depression were reported by 47.1% and 43.3% of participants, respectively. Only 16.5% reported high psychological well-being. Female and non-binary students had worse mental health outcomes than males (p value
Psychological distress, anxiety and depression are widespread among Italian students. Gender, academic stage and living situation significantly impact mental health outcomes. The findings emphasise the need for targeted mental health interventions, particularly for non-binary and female students, as well as those in advanced academic years.
Fertility therapies are becoming an increasingly common option for conception, but there is little knowledge on the interactions of assisted reproductive technology (ARTs) and stroke in women, and its use among women with a history of stroke. This scoping review aims to examine the current state of knowledge and identify the knowledge gaps regarding: (1) the stroke risk with use of fertility therapy and (2) the safety of fertility therapy among stroke survivors, to help guide future research and clinical practice.
The PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) checklist for scoping reviews was followed.
MEDLINE (Ovid), Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials (Ovid), EMBASE (Ovid), Medline, ClinicalTrials.gov and International Clinical Trials Registry Platform were searched through 20 June 2023.
All observational studies pertaining to use of fertility and stroke in humans over the age of 18 were included in this review.
Title and abstract and subsequent full-text review were performed by two independent reviewers in duplicate. A narrative synthesis of final articles for data abstraction is presented.
10 studies met inclusion criteria. The only meta-analysis that was included could not estimate the risk of stroke among all individuals undergoing fertility therapy due to lack of high-quality prospective cohort studies. There was only one prospective cohort that examined pregnancy among stroke survivors. Among the 32 pregnancies, one was conceived through in vitro fertilisation (IVF), although the details regarding stroke type, time since stroke, medications and IVF protocol were not specified. Therefore, the safety and effectiveness of ART among stroke survivors is currently unknown.
In this comprehensive review of existing fertility therapy science and stroke risk, we identify a large knowledge gap and a major scientific need for a systematic approach and prospective studies to better inform the risk of stroke during fertility therapy, especially among stroke survivors. Understanding this risk and developing treatment strategies serves to better inform women and healthcare providers as more women with a history of stroke seek and contemplate fertility therapy.
DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/PHQ4X
This systematic review examined eHealth solutions used to assess and monitor symptoms among adults with CKD.
A systematic review was conducted and reported in accordance with the PRISMA checklist. The review protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD4202452973).
Seven databases were searched for English language studies that reported eHealth solutions for symptom assessment and monitoring in CKD between January 2000 and May 2024. The methodological quality of studies was evaluated using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool and a co-design evaluation tool.
Thirty-eight studies involving 4345 participants with CKD were included. Most of the included studies were non-randomised controlled trials (n = 16) and non-experimental studies (n = 13); only a few studies (n = 9) were randomised controlled trials. Current eHealth solutions varied in technologies and functions but were primarily focused on self-monitoring (n = 22), data recording (n = 14), education (n = 13), providing information (n = 10) and reminders/alerts (n = 10). There was limited evidence from few intervention studies involving eHealth solutions showing improvements in CKD symptoms and/or health-related quality of life. Among the 14 studies that assessed user satisfaction, satisfaction was high, but challenges and barriers to implementing these solutions were reported.
eHealth solutions have the potential to facilitate symptom assessment and monitoring for adults with CKD, but further high-quality experimental studies are required to provide better evidence in practice.
eHealth symptom assessment and monitoring are increasing in practice. While some adults are willing and able to use eHealth solutions, barriers remain due to limited digital health literacy. As few randomised controlled trials exist, further studies are needed to evaluate the benefits of reducing chronic kidney disease symptom burden.
No Patient or Public Contribution.
To explore patient and family narratives about their recognition and response to clinical deterioration and their interactions with clinicians prior to and during Medical Emergency Team (MET) activations in hospital.
Research on clinical deterioration has mostly focused on clinicians' roles. Although patients and families can identify subtle cues of early deterioration, little research has focused on their experience of recognising, speaking up and communicating with clinicians during this period of instability.
A narrative inquiry.
Using narrative interviewing techniques, 33 adult patients and 14 family members of patients, who had received a MET call, in one private and one public academic teaching hospital in Melbourne, Australia were interviewed. Narrative analysis was conducted on the data.
The core story of help seeking for recognition and response by clinicians to patient deterioration yielded four subplots: (1) identifying deterioration, recognition that something was not right and different from earlier; (2) voicing concerns to their nurse or by family members on their behalf; (3) being heard, desiring a response acknowledging the legitimacy of their concerns; and (4) once concerns were expressed, there was an expectation of and trust in clinicians to act on the concerns and manage the situation.
Clinical deterioration results in an additional burden for hospitalised patients and families to speak up, seek help and resolve their concerns. Educating patients and families on what to be concerned about and when to notify staff requires a close partnership with clinicians.
Clinicians must create an environment that enables patients and families to speak up. They must be alert to both subjective and objective information, to acknowledge and to act on the information accordingly.
The consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ) guidelines were used for reporting.
The consumer researcher was involved in design, data analysis and publication preparation.
Rev Enferm;39(6): 56-65, 2016 Jun. . [Artículo]
FreshRSS 