Indian immigrants experience significant dietary acculturation post-migration, shifting from traditional diets to more westernised eating patterns influenced by socioeconomic and environmental factors. This transition, often marked by increased processed food consumption and reduced intake of traditional staples, contributes to elevated risks of obesity and type 2 diabetes. Despite the growing Indian diaspora in Australia, Canada, New Zealand and the UK, the evidence on their dietary acculturation remains limited.

This review will adopt the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology for scoping reviews. A three-step search strategy will be applied across databases including MEDLINE (via PubMed), CINAHL, Scopus and Web of Science. Google Scholar will be used as a supplementary search tool to identify additional relevant studies. The search will include peer-reviewed studies and grey literature published in English between 1 January 2000 and 22 May 2025. First-generation Indian immigrants of all ages will be included, while second-generation immigrants, refugee populations and studies linked to non-communicable disease interventions will be excluded. Screening will be conducted in Covidence by two independent reviewers, with discrepancies resolved by a third reviewer. Data will be extracted using a standard JBI tool, charted in tabular form, and synthesised narratively and thematically.

As this review will use published and publicly available data, formal ethics approval is not required. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publication, conference presentations and community engagement.

This study aims to evaluate relationships between self-reported fine motor ability and quality of life (assessed by life satisfaction and life problems) from people with spinal cord injury (SCI) at T1 and above.

Observational cohort study (current analysis from a cross section)

279 individuals with SCI at T1 or above

Community members sampled from records from two Midwestern hospitals and a speciality hospital in the Southeast United States

Fine motor ability was assessed via the Spinal Cord Injury Functional Index-Short Form 9A, while two facets of quality of life, life satisfaction and life problems, were assessed by the Life Situation Questionnaire-Revised version (LSQ-R). Pearson correlations and multivariate analysis were utilised to identify cross-sectional relationships between fine motor ability, life satisfaction and life problems.

Fine motor ability was positively correlated with total life satisfaction score (r=0.16; p=0.02) and was negatively correlated with the total life problems score (r=–0.18; p=0.01), health problems factor (r=–0.24; pβ=0.25; p=0.02), fewer life problems (β=–0.40; pβ=–0.11; pβ=–0.10; p

The results identified significant, modest associations between self-reported outcomes, as better fine motor ability was related to less social isolation, fewer health problems and higher life satisfaction. Further investigation into the relationship between fine motor ability, life satisfaction and life problems is warranted.

Lifestyle changes—such as adopting healthy nutrition and increasing physical activity—are essential for alleviating symptoms in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA) and overweight, with weight loss being a key outcome of these changes. Since 2019, healthcare professionals (HCPs) in the Netherlands have been able to refer these patients to a reimbursed combined lifestyle intervention (CLI). This study aims to identify determinants affecting CLI implementation for individuals with knee OA and overweight from both patient and HCP perspectives.

Semistructured interviews were conducted in a qualitative study with 23 individuals with knee OA and overweight and 16 HCPs (general practitioners (GPs) and lifestyle coaches). Interviews were transcribed verbatim and coded independently by two researchers using the updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).

Primary care, including GPs and lifestyle coaches from the Greater Rotterdam region in the Netherlands.

23 individuals with knee OA and overweight and 16 HCPs (GPs and lifestyle coaches).

Determinants were explored within four CFIR domains: innovation, outer setting, inner setting and individuals. Key facilitators included recognition of the programme’s potential, strong social support and positive participant–coach relationships. Major barriers involved the absence of an exercise component, financial constraints limiting its inclusion, scepticism among GPs about care quality, limited expertise of lifestyle coaches addressing OA-specific needs and difficulties adapting the programme to participants’ diverse knowledge levels and health literacy.

To improve the implementation of the CLI for patients with knee OA, it is essential to incorporate a tailored exercise component, strengthen lifestyle coaches’ expertise, address financial barriers and build trust among GPs through education and clear communication of programme outcomes. Tailoring the CLI to better meet participant needs is crucial to ensure its long-term effectiveness and sustainability as a treatment for individuals with knee OA and overweight.

Netherlands Trial Registry (NL9355).

Childhood overweight and obesity pose a growing public health problem with increasing prevalence both in Europe and globally. Reasons can be found in behavioural factors such as a sedentary lifestyle, eating habits or low exercise levels and to a lesser extent in a genetic predisposition or a metabolic disorder. Preventing children with obesity and overweight to grow into obese teenagers is therefore of high importance. However, there are currently no established care and prevention programmes in Germany for the early reduction of overweight and prevention of obesity in children aged 3–6 years. fruehstArt aims to close this gap with a cross-sector outreach and family-centred personal counselling approach, where parents receive support from paediatricians and trained coaches who conduct consultations in the home of the family. The main research question is whether the fruehstArt programme reduces overweight and obesity in children aged 3–6 years within 12 months, as measured by the body mass index-standard deviation score (BMI-SDS).

fruehstArt has been developed as a new form of care, which includes a family intervention with motivational interviews provided by paediatricians and individual home-based counselling provided by a trained coach on eating behaviour, exercising, sleeping behaviour and age-appropriate use of electronic devices. fruehstArt will be accompanied by an efficacy study (summative evaluation of change in BMI-SDS). In addition to German, the project is also offered in Turkish in order to reach families with a migration background and language barriers. 812 children with overweight or obesity and their families in the region North Rhine will be included and observed over 12 months. Recruitment of children occurred from December 2023 to April 2025 with the final visits scheduled for April 2026. The study is conducted as a randomised controlled trial with a social-ecological intervention approach, considering children in their living environment and conditions. Moreover, a formative evaluation at the process level, and the system level will be carried out and complemented by a health economic analysis. Those are carried out to provide information about the intervention’s success and relevant costs. Thus, fruehstArt is realised in the form of an effectiveness–implementation hybrid design that combines the analysis of effectiveness with an evaluation of the implementation process.

The study received ethics approval in a coordinated procedure from the ethics committee of the Medical Faculty University hospital of Cologne and the ethics committee of the North Rhine Medical Association. For all collected data, the relevant national and European data protection regulations will be considered. All personal data (contact details) will be removed for the data analysis in order to ensure pseudonymisation. Dissemination strategies include reports and quality workshops for organisations, peer-reviewed publications and the presentation of results at conferences.

The aim of the unique form of care fruehstArt is to improve the care of preschool children with overweight or obesity through innovative home-based counselling, cross-sectoral service integration and to address the cultural needs of Turkish families.

DRKS00030749 (29-09-2023)

Demographic change is resulting in a growing number of individuals requiring nursing care, while the availability of professional caregivers is simultaneously declining. This imbalance places increasing pressure on care provision, particularly in home settings and rural areas. Primary care services are also under pressure. Digital solutions such as teleconsultations are considered promising strategies to support intersectoral collaboration in long-term care and to mitigate existing gaps in service provision.

Seven teleconsultation projects in long-term care are being conducted using a mixed-methods design aligned with the phases of the Medical Research Council framework: with a focus on the feasibility phase. Data on structural conditions, usage patterns and user acceptance will be collected through standardised instruments (including Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology and Fit between Individuals, Task and Technology). In addition, focus groups and interviews will be carried out. The quantitative analysis will include descriptive and inferential statistical methods and will be complemented by a cost–consequence analysis. The qualitative data will be analysed using structuring content analysis. The aim is to provide a context-informed and theory-informed assessment of the implementation and potential impact of telemedical consultations.

The study has been approved by the Ethics Committee in Tübingen. Participation is voluntary and based on written informed consent. Data protection is ensured in accordance with the GDPR (General Data Protection Regulation); all data are pseudonymised and processed separately. Results will be communicated in a target group-appropriate manner and published in scientific journals. Practice-oriented recommendations will be developed to support the further advancement of telemedical care in nursing.

While paediatric cardiac arrest is a rare event, consequences for the patients are significant with a considerable risk of morbidity, disability and mortality. The risk of cardiac arrest is substantially increased in children with congenital heart disease. Nevertheless, there is a lack of data concerning this population. To close this knowledge gap, this multicentre, prospective, open registry aims to implement a standardised structure for data collection and follow-up of paediatric cardiac arrests associated with heart diseases in Germany.

All paediatric patients who experience a cardiac arrest and receive at least 2 minutes of cardiopulmonary resuscitation are invited to participate in this registry. The dataset comprises demographical, clinical, resuscitation and outcome data, collected in accordance with the Utstein guidelines. Neurological assessments, cognitive and motor tests are conducted at fixed intervals. Additionally, patient-reported outcome measures will be surveyed. Primary outcomes are survival to discharge and neurodevelopmental outcome after discharge and 2 years. The data are pseudonymised prior to submission to an online REDCap database, which is centrally hosted on a server located in Leipzig, Germany.

This study follows the Declaration of Helsinki and received ethical approval from the Ethics Committee in Leipzig. Registry results will allow us to understand the epidemiology, guideline adherence, risk factors and will be presented at conferences and submitted to a peer-reviewed journal for publication.

NCT05373498.

Poor cardiopulmonary fitness is an important risk factor for postoperative complications, yet a feasible, objective and prognostically accurate method to assess preoperative fitness has not been established. The 6 min walk test (6MWT) is a simple, inexpensive and widely applicable measure that shows promise for predicting postoperative risk. However, robust data are lacking on whether the 6MWT accurately predicts complications, provides incremental prognostic value beyond routinely collected clinical factors or outperforms simpler alternatives such as questionnaires, cardiac biomarkers or grip strength testing. The Functional Assessment for Surgery by a Timed Walk (FAST Walk) study is designed to address these knowledge gaps by evaluating whether the 6MWT improves prediction of key postoperative outcomes compared with clinical factors and simpler measures of fitness.

The FAST Walk study is an international multicentre prospective cohort study of 1672 adults (≥40 years) undergoing major elective non-cardiac surgery at centres in Canada, Hong Kong, Australia, Spain and the Netherlands. Participants complete a preoperative 6MWT and baseline assessments of comorbidities, self-reported cardiopulmonary fitness (MET: Re-evaluation for Perioperative Cardiac Risk questionnaire), biomarkers (N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide) and grip strength. The primary outcome is 30-day death or major postoperative complication, defined as Clavien-Dindo grade II or higher. Secondary outcomes are (1) death or new significant disability at 90 days after surgery and (2) days alive and out of hospital at 30 days after surgery. Disability is measured using the short-form WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 instrument. Multivariable regression models and complementary metrics of prediction performance will be used to determine whether 6MWT distance adds prognostic value beyond routinely collected clinical factors and simpler measures of fitness.

The FAST Walk study has received research ethics board approval at all participating sites. Recruitment commenced in June 2024, with completion of participant follow-up expected in 2026. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations, with the primary results anticipated in 2027.

NCT06412367.

The use of economic evidence to prioritise vaccines and delivery strategies to optimally use in immunisation systems is becoming a global priority, especially in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), in view of challenges in funding and the need to make more efficient use of available resources. We undertook a scoping review to identify and synthesise available evidence on strategies that have been used to enhance the use of economic evidence in policy and decision-making in the immunisation ecosystem in LMICs. The review was also used to identify the facilitators and constraints to the use of economic evidence for vaccination policy and decision making in LMICs and the sustainability of the identified strategies.

A scoping literature review was undertaken to generate the evidence. The review adhered to the first five steps of Arksey and O’Malley’s methodological framework (identifying and refining the research questions, identifying relevant articles, selection of studies, data extraction and charting and data synthesis) and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping reviews.

Full-text articles were searched on PUBMED, HINARI and DOAJ using different combinations of search words as of 16 December 2024

We included articles from LMICs, including Africa, and global experiences, including those from LMICs. Papers must be written in English or have an English language translation available and published between 1 January 2004 and 16 December 2024.

Two independent reviewers used standardised methods to search, extract, and screen included studies. The findings from the review were summarized in themes that were synthesized qualitatively.

18 eligible articles met the inclusion criteria and were included in the synthesis. It was found that economic evidence was systematically requested and demonstrably influencing vaccine introduction or prioritisation decisions in only eight out of 32 LMIC settings with functional National Immunization Technical Advisory Groups (NITAGs) and in fewer than 20% of documented new vaccine introduction processes since 2015. In the majority of cases, decisions were reported as being driven primarily by disease burden, political priority, donor recommendations or historical precedent, with economic analyses either absent, produced post hoc or acknowledged but not used as a decisive factor.

There is minimal use of evidence from economics in decision-making within the immunisation ecosystem. Expert advisory committees in LMICS can, however, enhance the use of economic evidence in vaccination policy and decision-making. Hence, in order to use economic evidence for decision making, national advisory committees such as NITAGs need enhanced capacity, independence and close collaboration with researchers. LMIC NITAGs could also benefit from tailored adaptations, such as simplified cost-effectiveness tools and regional economic data hubs, to bridge this gap in decision-making and bring economic evidence to the fore of their decisions.

Our primary objectives were (1) to develop and validate an administrative data algorithm for the identification of hand trauma cases using clinical diagnoses documented in medical records as the reference standard and (2) to estimate the incidence of hand trauma in a universal public healthcare system from 1993 to 2023 using a population-based research cohort constructed using a validated case identification algorithm.

A population-based retrospective validation study.

Ontario, Canada, from 2022 to 2023 (validation) and from 1993 to 2023 (estimation).

Our reference standard was the known hand trauma status of 301 patients (N=147 with hand trauma) who presented to an urban tertiary-care hand trauma centre in Toronto, Ontario.

(1) The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of the optimal algorithm to identify hand trauma using provincial health administrative data and (2) age-standardised and sex-standardised incidence rates of hand trauma among men and women, by age, and by area of patient residence.

The optimal algorithm had a sensitivity of 73.8% (95% CI 66.6% to 81.0%), specificity of 80.1% (95% CI 73.8% to 86.5%), positive predictive value of 78.1% (95% CI 71.2% to 85.0%) and negative predictive value of 76.1% (95% CI 69.5% to 82.7%). Over the study period, the age-standardised and sex-standardised incidence of hand trauma increased from 384 to 530 per 100 000. The greatest increase was observed in males and individuals aged 0–19 and 80+, with higher incidence rates in Southern compared with Northern Ontario.

Our algorithm enabled identification of hand trauma cases using health administrative data suitable for population-level surveillance and health services research, revealing a rising burden of hand trauma from 1993 to 2023. These findings can support improved surveillance, resource allocation and care delivery for this public health problem.

Health literacy (HL) is essential for making informed health-related decisions, for example enabling parents to reduce their child’s allergy risk. Health literacy does not, however, rely solely on an individual’s capacities, but is strongly influenced by external factors. Midwives provide important health advice to families, particularly since their relationship is close during a time of significant transition. This offers them a unique opportunity to positively influence the HL of parents, which in turn may support the health and well-being of the whole family. The aim of this study is to develop and evaluate an intervention that can support midwives in providing allergy prevention advice in a way that is in line with the concept of HL.

In accordance with the recommendations of the Medical Research Council framework in the first phase of this study, we will survey midwives (target sample size=379) in Germany regarding their practices, the potential barriers they face and enabling factors in providing advice on early childhood allergy prevention in an HL-responsive way. The data will be subjected to descriptive statistical analysis. Two co-design workshops will then be conducted with various stakeholders in two regions (Rhineland-Palatinate and Saxony) of Germany. Following the protocol proposed by the Stanford Design Thinking School, we will use design thinking to collect ideas for the intervention. Based on these ideas and our previous qualitative and quantitative study, we will develop an intervention in collaboration with didactic experts. The intervention will be piloted in three groups (midwives=10–15, midwives working as practice supervisors=5–10, students of midwifery=10–20). For the process evaluation, we will use observation protocols of the intervention conduct and qualitative interviews. For the outcome evaluation, we will use a questionnaire and observations in simulation laboratories with students of midwifery.

This study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of Regensburg (ID 23-3441-101) and is in compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Participation in the study will only be possible after informed consent has been given. Our results will be presented at national and international conferences and published in scientific journals. Additionally, once it has been finalised, we will make the intervention available to educational institutions for (future) midwives.

Recently, legal questions have increasingly arisen in intensive care medicine (ICM), especially when it comes to end-of-life decisions. Still, for Europe, there is not much evidence about doctors’ situational legal knowledge and legal education during medical studies and further qualification. The present study was initiated to analyse these hitherto unexplored aspects in Germany.

A quantitative online survey has been performed among German intensive care physicians. The voluntary participants of the anonymous online survey were asked to answer legal questions related to end-of-life policies, informed consent, surrogate decision making or advance directives. We tested pure factual knowledge in five questions. The other five questions tested situational knowledge using case vignettes. Every question could be answered with ‘yes’, ‘no’ or ‘do not know’. Furthermore, the participants were asked to assess their subjective certainty on a Likert scale and to provide information about their professional experience (PE) and qualification.

All members of the two German professional societies for anaesthesiology who work in ICM were asked to take part in the survey.

952 completed questionnaires were analysed. 86% of the participants were specialists, and 56% held the additional qualification in ICM. 78% had more than 10 years of general clinical experience, and 62% had more than 5 years of experience in ICM.

On average, the participants answered the five facts–questions in 90.8% correctly. However, only 73.6% of the five case vignettes were answered correctly. Specialists, physicians with a lot of PE or physicians holding the additional qualification in ICM did not perform better than assistants or physicians with little PE.

German intensive care physicians have relevant gaps regarding situational legal knowledge, which are independent of their PE or qualification and persist. This may be due to difficulties in interpretation and implementation of law. Since these knowledge gaps can lead to liability and criminal prosecution, these gaps should be closed through awareness-raising and continuous education.

Forming secure attachment relationships provides children with the best possible start to life. Children from families with high psychosocial vulnerability and complex mental health needs (eg, caregivers with lived experience of trauma, experiencing mental illness or substance abuse, current or past domestic violence, and/or current or a history of child protection issues) are at the greatest risk of experiencing attachment disturbances. Nurturing Connections is a new early intervention service launched by the New South Wales State Ministry of Health targeting both caregiver adversity and the caregiver-child attachment relationships in families with high psychosocial vulnerability and complex mental health needs. This paper outlines the evaluation protocol of the Nurturing Connections Programme.

A mixed-methods design will be used to undertake an implementation and outcomes evaluation. The study will draw on both qualitative and quantitative data, including routinely collected service data, surveys, participant observations, and semi-structured interview and yarning circle data. Appropriate descriptive and inferential techniques will be used to analyse quantitative data while thematic analysis will be drawn on to analyse qualitative data.

This research was approved by the South Eastern Sydney Local Health District Research Ethics Committee (2024/ETH01715). The Mid North Coast Local Health District also received ethics approval from the Aboriginal Health and Medical Research Council of New South Wales (2380/25). Evaluation findings will be shared via published manuscripts, conference presentations, as well as a final report to funding bodies.

Anxiety disorders, obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD) and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) are common in children and adolescents and can lead to significant impairment. Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) with exposure is the first-line treatment, yet approximately half of treated youth do not achieve full remission. Dysfunctional cognitions—negative automatic thoughts, maladaptive beliefs and distorted interpretations—are considered key targets of CBT, but evidence in youth is mixed and underpowered. This study will examine whether change in dysfunctional cognitions mediates treatment outcome in anxiety, OCD and PTSD symptoms and whether this association varies across individual characteristics.

An individual participant data meta-analysis (IPDMA) of randomised controlled trials of CBT for youth aged 5–18 years with anxiety disorders, OCD or PTSD will be conducted. The search strategy includes the databases APA PsycINFO, MEDLINE and Web of Science Core Collection from inception to 8 September 2025. It is supplemented by screening reference lists, trial registries, grey literature and outreach to relevant research groups. Eligible trials must include at least one validated measure of dysfunctional cognitions administered at minimum pre- and post-treatment, and clinical outcomes assessed at post-treatment and follow-up. The two primary outcomes are (1) child-reported symptom severity and (2) clinician-rated clinical severity. Data will be harmonised for dysfunctional cognition scores, moderators (age, gender, socioeconomic status, comorbidity), and primary outcomes. One-stage Bayesian mixed-effects models will examine whether changes in dysfunctional cognitions predict improvements in primary outcomes and whether these effects are moderated by individual characteristics. Missing data will be addressed using multiple imputation within the Bayesian framework, and study-level heterogeneity will be modelled using random intercepts and slopes.

All datasets will be de-identified and managed under General Data Protection Regulation standards. Each included trial will have ethical approval permitting data sharing and reuse, and the secondary analysis of the shared datasets has been approved by the University of Amsterdam. Findings will be disseminated via a peer-reviewed publication, scientific conferences and open sharing of analysis scripts and harmonisation procedures.

CRD420251139130.

Alcohol use disorder (AUD) is a prevalent, chronic condition generating considerable global morbidity, mortality and socioeconomic burden. Despite the availability of established pharmacotherapies, overall treatment uptake remains low and effect sizes are moderate at best. Emerging evidence highlights substantial differences in treatment response between sexes and genders, yet these factors are rarely systematically considered in clinical trials or routine care. Existing reviews have limited scope and often exclude gender-diverse populations. This project aims to (1) Synthesise evidence on gender- and sex-specific efficacy, safety and adherence in AUD pharmacotherapies, (2) Evaluate the consideration of sex and gender beyond binary classifications in existing research and (3) Develop recommendations for gender- and sex-sensitive treatment strategies.

A systematic review and meta-analysis will be conducted using (PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Google Scholar, German Clinical Trials Register and ClinicalTrials.gov). We will include randomised controlled trials of pharmacotherapies for AUD with a minimum treatment duration of 4 weeks, reporting gender-specific and/or sex-specific results. The literature search will cover studies published up to October 2025, with inclusion restricted to articles published in English or German, regardless of setting. Two reviewers will independently screen records and assess risk of bias (Cochrane RoB), with evidence certainty evaluated using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation and aligned to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 and Sex and Gender Equity in Research guidelines.

Ethics approval is not required as only data from already completed studies and supplementary information directly provided by study authors are used. Findings and recommendations will be disseminated in peer-reviewed journals and presented at conferences and workshops.

CRD420251079160.

Exercise-based interventions are well-established in reducing falls and fall-related injuries, but adherence and accessibility remain key challenges, particularly in rural areas. While conventional in-person training is widely used, digital interventions may offer scalable solutions to enhance engagement and reach. However, pragmatic trials evaluating the real-world effectiveness of conventional and digitally supported fall prevention interventions are lacking, limiting the evidence base for their implementation in routine healthcare settings. The SURE-Footed into the Future Fall Intervention Trial (SURE-FIT) aims to compare the effectiveness of two structured fall prevention interventions—a conventional centre-based exercise programme and a hybrid telemedical programme combining in-person and tablet-supported training—against a wait-list control group in reducing falls and fall-related injuries among community-dwelling older adults.

This study is a pragmatic three-arm, parallel-group, randomised controlled superiority trial with a 1:1:1 allocation ratio. Participants (≥65 years, community-dwelling, planned n=2778) will be randomly assigned to (1) conventional centre-based training supplemented with printed materials for home-based continuation (conventional group), (2) a hybrid model integrating centre-based and tablet-supported training for continuation (tablet group) or (3) a wait-list control group. The intervention includes a 9-week supervised phase followed by 43 weeks of independent home-based training. The primary outcomes are the incidence rate of falls and fall-related injuries over 12 months. Secondary outcomes include physical functioning, physical activity, concerns about falling, loneliness and the risk of low protein intake. A process evaluation will assess intervention feasibility and implementation. Additionally, qualitative interviews will be conducted with participants, course instructors and municipal stakeholders to explore experiences, facilitators and challenges related to programme participation and implementation. A health-economic evaluation will be conducted to assess the cost-effectiveness of the structured fall prevention interventions. Data collection will take place at baseline and every 3 months via standardised questionnaires, with a subgroup undergoing physical performance testing and sensor-based activity monitoring. Analyses will follow an intention-to-treat approach.

Ethical approval has been granted by the Ethics Committee of Ulm University (271/23). Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants before enrolment. Study findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, scientific conferences and national fall prevention initiatives. Additionally, results will be shared with key municipal representatives, and the German National Association of Senior Citizens’ Organisations (BAGSO). A publicly accessible website will provide ongoing access to study information and findings in plain language.

DRKS00032878, German Clinical Trials Register

Nurses are expected to effectively manage and educate the growing number of patients with diabetes in sub-Saharan Africa. This review aimed to map and describe literature relating to the nurses’ diabetes knowledge and the factors promoting and hindering the acquisition of their knowledge.

Sub-Saharan Africa.

Scoping review.

A systematic literature search was conducted in electronic databases, such as CINAHL, PubMed, Scopus, African Journals Online and Web of Science and grey literature. Authors and experts in diabetes care and scoping reviews were also contacted. Included studies were assessed using the inclusion criteria developed in advance. Searches were conducted between March and June 2020 and updated in November 2024. Results were presented descriptively.

A total of 2974 records were retrieved through systematic database and hand searches, resulting in 1900 records when duplicates were removed. Of these, 250 potentially relevant studies were identified for thorough assessment for eligibility. The process yielded 20 studies that focused on diabetes knowledge among nurses in sub-Saharan Africa. Most studies reported gaps in diabetes knowledge among nurses including pathology, laboratory investigations, insulin therapy, type two diabetes treatment, exercise, diet and complications. Barriers to diabetes knowledge acquisition included lack of hospital guidelines, staff, training and inadequate salary. Facilitators included experience in managing or counselling patients with diabetes and refresher nutrition courses.

Nurses in sub-Saharan Africa have gaps in diabetes knowledge. Further research is required on tailor-made strategies for enhancing the nurses’ diabetes knowledge and implementation of the same to prepare nurses and other clinical team members to effectively care for, support and teach patients with diabetes.

During the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, there was a notable decline in emergency department (ED) usage in many jurisdictions. This study assessed changes in ED use during this period and explored how the pandemic may have aggravated existing healthcare access inequities.

Our primary objective was to assess pandemic-related changes to ED visits and emergency hospitalisations for distinct demographic groups.

We conducted a retrospective observational study using population-based provincial administrative data.

We analysed data from all the 109 EDs and urgent care centres in Alberta, Canada, during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic (15 March 2020 to 30 June 2020), and during the corresponding (control) period 1 year earlier. We conducted subgroup analyses by age, First Nations status, sex, location and material deprivation. We repeated all analyses for pre-selected life-threatening emergency diagnoses.

We examined outcomes for a priori subgroups, including female and ‘other’ sex patients, paediatric patients (age 0–17 years), seniors (age 65 years and older), patients living in remote areas (greater than 200 km from an urban centre), First Nations members and patients living in materially deprived postal codes falling into the two most deprived Pampalon Index quintiles.

Primary outcomes were number of ED visits, number of ED visits with admission to hospital and number of ED visits resulting in patient death in the ED. A secondary outcome was change in ED use for life-threatening diagnoses (eg, cardiac conditions and hepatic disease).

ED visits in the COVID-19 period decreased by 34% (Poisson means test p

Reductions in critical emergency care and emergency hospital admissions were unequally distributed across demographic groups during the COVID-19 period. Study methods could be used to monitor and support equitable access to emergency care among distinct populations.