Urgent and emergency care (UEC) systems in England face unprecedented pressures, with record accident and emergency attendances, persistent breaches of ambulance response targets and poorer outcomes for time-sensitive conditions. National UEC recovery plans have introduced multiple innovations—such as same-day emergency care, virtual wards and specialty hubs—to manage these pressures and improve patient flow. Rural coastal areas are particularly vulnerable to excessive demand due to higher levels of deprivation, older populations with complex health needs, seasonal surges that generate unpredictable demand and challenges in attracting and retaining staff. Following the Chief Medical Officer’s 2021 Annual Report, funding research and developing bespoke solutions to manage UEC demand and address geographical disparities has been recognised as a national priority. The Elevate study responds to this priority by identifying and evaluating innovative models of UEC in rural coastal communities in England.

The Elevate study is a 30-month, mixed-methods evaluation that comprises three interlinked work packages: (1) National service mapping—outlining provision of innovative models of UEC in rural coastal areas of England. This will be developed through document review and interviews with regional and national service leaders. (2) Quantitative analysis—quasiexperimental and longitudinal approaches will use National Health Service (NHS) England’s Emergency Care Data Set and linked routine NHS datasets to evaluate the impact of UEC models on health and process outcomes. Standard and bespoke metrics will be developed and used to assess performance. (3) Qualitative case studies—up to 12 case studies of UEC models in rural coastal communities. Interviews with patients and staff and non-participant observation will explore how and why different UEC models influence patient experience, clinical outcomes, resource use and the workforce. Findings will be integrated using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research to identify components of UEC models that are effective, scalable and sensitive to local context,

Ethical approval for qualitative components was granted by the North of Scotland Research Ethics Committee (25/NS/0099). Dissemination will include peer-reviewed publications, policy briefs, creative media and community engagement activities to ensure findings are communicated inclusively and effectively to policymakers, health and social care practitioners and the public.

Research Registry (researchregistry11126).

Although breastfeeding is associated with lower postnatal depression and anxiety, limited research exists regarding long-term maternal mental health outcomes. This study examined the association between breastfeeding and depression and anxiety in women of later reproductive age (mid 30s to menopause).

This was a 10-year prospective longitudinal cohort study. Self-reported questionnaires were used to collect lifetime breastfeeding behaviour at 10 years, and health history including depression, anxiety and medication use was collected at each study timepoint.

A tertiary level maternity hospital in Dublin, Ireland.

168 parous women from the ROLO Longitudinal Cohort with lifetime breastfeeding behaviour and health history data available at 10 years were included (22% of total cohort). Women currently pregnant or breastfeeding at 10-year follow-up were excluded.

Mean (SD) age at study end was 42.4 (3.8) years. 72.6% (n=122) of women reported ever breastfeeding. Median lifetime exclusive breastfeeding was 5.5 weeks (IQR 35.8, range 0–190). 37.5% of women (n=63) breastfed for ≥12 months over their lifetime. 13.1% (n=22) reported depression or anxiety at 10 years, and 20.8% (n=35) reported depression or anxiety over the whole study period. Ever breastfeeding was associated with less depression and anxiety at 10 years (OR 0.34, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.94, p=0.04). Ever breastfeeding, longer exclusive breastfeeding and lifetime breastfeeding ≥12 months were associated with lower depression and anxiety over the whole study period (ever breastfeeding OR 0.4, p=0.03; exclusive breastfeeding OR 0.98/week, p=0.03; lifetime breastfeeding ≥12 months OR 0.38, p=0.04).

There may be a protective association between breastfeeding and self-reported depression and anxiety. Further studies are required to confirm the findings.

ISRCTN54392969.

A healthy diet is a crucial component for adolescents’ health and wellbeing. Current literature surrounding dietary intake and its effect on cognition, mental health and wellbeing has mainly focused on children, not adolescents. This review aims to synthesise findings from studies that explore the relationship between dietary intake and cognition, mental health and wellbeing in the adolescent population.

Electronic searches will date from 1 January 2000 to 7 October 2024 and will be conducted in CENTRAL, MEDLINE/PubMed, CINAHL via EBSCOHOST, ERIC, British Education Index, Child and Adolescent Studies, Education research complete, Psychology and Behavioural Sciences Collection, Social Policy and Practice Embase, and APAPsychINFO via OvidSP. Articles will be screened using defined inclusion and exclusion criteria and assessed for eligibility by five independent reviewers. Discrepancies will be reviewed by a third reviewer. The selection process of included articles will be reported by using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses flow diagram. A narrative summary will be used to report and synopsise the extracted data.

This systematic review does not require ethical approval. The dissemination strategy for this review comprises peer-reviewed publications, public health conference presentations and providing a valuable reference for healthy-food interventions in school and community-based settings as well as identifying gaps in the current literature and informing policy and practice.

CRD42025633083.

This study assessed the association between fine particulate matter (PM_2.5) exposure during pregnancy and stillbirth in Pakistan. We hypothesised that higher PM_2.5 exposure is linked to increased stillbirth risk.

A cross-sectional study using secondary data from the 2017 to 2018 Pakistan Demographic and Health Survey (PDHS), combined with satellite-derived PM_2.5 exposure data.

The study covered urban and rural areas across Pakistan, including all four provinces (Punjab, Sindh, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and Baluchistan) and administrative regions (Gilgit-Baltistan (GB), Islamabad, Federally Administered Tribal Areas and Azad Jammu Kashmir).

The study included 9172 married women aged 15–49 with at least one birth in the past 5 years. Women with incomplete pregnancy outcome data were excluded.

PM_2.5 exposure was estimated using satellite data, matching PDHS clusters with the nearest air quality point via MATLAB. Monthly average exposure was categorised into quartiles.

Stillbirth, defined as pregnancy loss at ≥28 weeks gestation.

Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the association between PM_2.5 and stillbirth, adjusting for maternal age, gravidity, wealth index, birth interval, previous adverse pregnancy outcome and region of residence. The stillbirth rate in Pakistan for the most recent pregnancy was 17.0 (14.5–19.9) per 1000 births, with highest rates (28.9) in Baluchistan province. The mean level of PM_2.5 exposure in Pakistan was 53.96 (SD 20.42; range 5.9–209.4) µg/m³. PM_2.5 exposure was higher for urban (56.43) than rural (51.87) pregnancies, highest in Sindh (78.06) and lowest in GB (13.41) provinces. For every 1 µg/m³ average increase in PM_2.5 during the pregnancy period, there was approximately 1% increase in stillbirth.

Increased PM_2.5 exposure was strongly associated with stillbirth risk. This underscores the need for targeted public health interventions, such as government regulations, emission controls and clean energy initiatives to protect pregnant women in high-risk areas.

Forming secure attachment relationships provides children with the best possible start to life. Children from families with high psychosocial vulnerability and complex mental health needs (eg, caregivers with lived experience of trauma, experiencing mental illness or substance abuse, current or past domestic violence, and/or current or a history of child protection issues) are at the greatest risk of experiencing attachment disturbances. Nurturing Connections is a new early intervention service launched by the New South Wales State Ministry of Health targeting both caregiver adversity and the caregiver-child attachment relationships in families with high psychosocial vulnerability and complex mental health needs. This paper outlines the evaluation protocol of the Nurturing Connections Programme.

A mixed-methods design will be used to undertake an implementation and outcomes evaluation. The study will draw on both qualitative and quantitative data, including routinely collected service data, surveys, participant observations, and semi-structured interview and yarning circle data. Appropriate descriptive and inferential techniques will be used to analyse quantitative data while thematic analysis will be drawn on to analyse qualitative data.

This research was approved by the South Eastern Sydney Local Health District Research Ethics Committee (2024/ETH01715). The Mid North Coast Local Health District also received ethics approval from the Aboriginal Health and Medical Research Council of New South Wales (2380/25). Evaluation findings will be shared via published manuscripts, conference presentations, as well as a final report to funding bodies.

To assess the capability of a convolutional neural network trained by transfer learning on anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) images, Placido-disk corneal topography images and external photographs to predict age and biological sex.

Development of a deep learning model trained on retrospectively collected data using transfer learning.

A multicentre secondary care public health trust based in London.

We included 557,468 scans from 40,592 eyes of 20,542 patients. Data were extracted from all patients who underwent MS-39 imaging within our trust from October 2020 to March 2023.

Primary outcome measures for biological sex classification included accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score and area under the receiver operating curve (ROC-AUC). Primary outcome measures for age prediction were Pearson correlation coefficients (r), coefficients of determination (R²) and the mean absolute error (MAE) to evaluate the predictive performance. The secondary outcome was to visualise and interpret the model’s decision-making process through the construction of saliency maps.

For age prediction, the MAEs for the Placido, AS-OCT and external photograph models were 5.2, 5.1 and 6.2 years, respectively. For gender classification, the same models achieved ROC-AUCs of 0.88, 0.73 and 0.81, respectively. No difference in performance was found in the analysis of corneas with pathological topography. The saliency maps highlighted the peri-limbal cornea for age prediction and the central cornea for gender discrimination.

Our study demonstrates that deep learning models can extract age and gender information from anterior segment images. These findings support the concept that the anterior segment, like the retina, encodes important biological information. Future research should explore whether these models can predict specific systemic conditions.

Interprofessional co-debriefing, whereby facilitators from different healthcare professional backgrounds jointly facilitate debriefings, is increasingly common in simulation-based education. This approach can enhance learning by incorporating diverse perspectives and distributing cognitive workload, but it may also expose tensions linked to professional identity, hierarchy and power dynamics between debriefers. While learner outcomes and debriefing strategies in general are well studied, little is known about faculty experiences of interprofessional co-debriefing or how sociocultural factors influence this practice. Addressing this gap is crucial to optimise faculty development and support effective interprofessional education. This study will qualitatively explore the experiences and perceptions of simulation educators engaged in interprofessional co-debriefing, with a focus on the influence of sociocultural factors on their practice.

This UK-based qualitative study will recruit up to 30 healthcare simulation educators with experience of interprofessional co-debriefing. Participants will be purposively sampled from simulation networks, centres and academic institutions, with snowball sampling to broaden reach. Semistructured interviews will be conducted online via Microsoft Teams, guided by a topic framework developed by the research team. Interviews will be audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and anonymised. Underpinned by constructivist and constructionist paradigms, data will be analysed using reflexive thematic analysis following Braun and Clarke’s six-phase approach. Three researchers will independently code transcripts, with themes refined through iterative team discussions to ensure rigour and transparency.

Ethical approval has been granted by the University of Glasgow School of Medical and Life Sciences Ethics Committee (Ref No: 200240285). All participants will provide informed written consent, and data will be handled in accordance with data protection regulations. Findings will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations and professional networks, with a summary provided to participants. This study will offer novel insights into the underexplored area of interprofessional co-debriefing, specifically how sociocultural dynamics may influence and shape practice, potentially informing faculty development and best practice moving forward.

Food insecurity is increasing in the UK, impacting choice and diet quality. The current means-tested free school meals (FSM) policy was put in place to address dietary inequalities and food insecurity in school children. In secondary schools, approximately 20% of students who are eligible and registered do not take their FSM. Working across a range of schools that have variable levels of FSM uptake, this study aims to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the current means-tested FSM policy in UK secondary schools on diet and food insecurity outcomes, understand what factors are associated with uptake and test the potential impact of any proposed policy change.

Secondary schools (n=32) in both Northern Ireland and the Midlands region of the UK are being recruited into the study. Data will be collected from school staff, governors, students and parents via questionnaires, as well as observational data of school eating environments. Qualitative data will be collected in selected case study schools (n=6–8). Multilevel modelling will be undertaken to evaluate the association between FSM uptake and fruit and vegetable intake, overall diet quality and food insecurity in all students. Economic evaluation will be conducted using a cost–utility approach. The effect of policy change will be modelled and school factors associated with FSM uptake explored using multiple methods.

Ethical approval has been obtained from Queen’s University Belfast Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences Research Ethical Committee (MHLS 23_55). Findings will be disseminated to key national and local agencies, to schools through reports and presentations, and to the public through media and open access publications.

Lower gastrointestinal symptoms attributed to colorectal disease are common. Early diagnosis of serious colorectal disease such as colorectal cancer (CRC), precancerous growths (polyps) and inflammation is important to ensure the best possible outcomes for a patient. The current ‘gold standard’ diagnostic test is colonoscopy. Colonoscopy is an invasive procedure. Some people struggle to cope with it and require intravenous sedation and/or analgesia. It is also resource-intensive, needing to be performed in specialist endoscopy units by a trained team. Across the UK, the demand for colonoscopy is outstripping capacity and the diagnosis of colorectal disease is being delayed. A colon capsule endoscope (CCE) is an alternative colorectal diagnostic. It is a ‘camera in a pill’ that can be swallowed and which passes through the gastrointestinal tract, obtaining visual images on the colon. There is now established experience of CCE in the UK. CCE might provide a less invasive method to diagnose colorectal disease if found to be accurate and effective and provide a means by which to increase the National Health Service (NHS) diagnostic capacity.

The aim of this study is to determine the diagnostic accuracy of CCE when compared with colonoscopy in representative and clinically meaningful cohorts of patients. An evaluation of the experiences of CCE for the patient and clinical team and an assessment of cost effectiveness will be undertaken.

We will undertake three research workstreams (WS). In WS1, we shall perform a paired (back-to-back) study. Each participant will swallow the CCE and then later on the same day they will have a colonoscopy. The study has been designed in collaboration with our Patient Advisory Group and as closely mirrors standard care as is possible. 973 participants will be recruited from three representative clinical contexts; suspected CRC, suspected inflammatory bowel disease and postpolypectomy surveillance. Up to 30 sites across the UK will be involved to maximise inclusivity. Measures of diagnostic accuracy will be reported along with CCE completion rates, number of colonoscopy procedures potentially prevented and adverse events, such as capsule retention. A nested substudy of intraobserver and interobserver agreement will be performed. WS2 will develop models of cost-effectiveness and WS3 will evaluate the patient and clinician experience, with reference to acceptability and choice.

The study findings will provide the evidence base to inform future colorectal diagnostic services.

The study has approval from the North East—Tyne and Wear South research ethics committee (REC reference 24/NE/0178, IRAS 331349). The findings will be disseminated to the NHS, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, other clinical stakeholders and participants, patients and the public.

ISRCTN16126290.

To understand general practitioners’ (GPs’) experience of existing care pathways for people with moderate-severe Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) and explore their attitudes towards potential modifications to these pathways.

Secondary thematic analysis of qualitative interviews, originally conducted with GPs to explore prescribing of memantine in general practice. The theoretical domains framework was used to structure the data.

The study participants were recruited via an online survey completed by GPs across England.

Semi-structured, qualitative interviews were conducted with thirteen male and ten female GPs from a range of general practices in England.

Insights into GPs’ views and experiences regarding existing and possible care pathways for individuals with moderate to severe AD.

Gaps in GPs’ current levels of knowledge and skill in respect of caring for patients with moderate-to-severe AD affect their confidence and ability to identify opportunities for additional treatments. While GPs emphasise their role as providers of holistic care, features of the current healthcare context, including a lack of additional funding, inhibit their willingness to assume additional responsibilities as part of a revised pathway.

A considerable knowledge, skills and confidence gap must be addressed to support the implementation of new care pathways that include revised responsibilities for GPs. GPs need appropriate support and resources to manage their patients’ changing needs and to provide the best possible pharmacological management as the disease develops.

School environments that encourage children to be physically active can embed lifelong positive health behaviours and contribute towards reducing health inequalities. The Health and Activity of Pupils in the Primary Years (HAPPY) study aims to: (1) explore the extent to which the WHO criteria for creating active school environments are implemented by primary schools and (2) examine associations between active school environments and children’s physical activity, mental health and educational performance.

The HAPPY study is a quasi-experimental study comprising: (1) a survey of state-funded Greater London primary schools to identify implementation of the WHO’s six criteria and (2) a cross-sectional study to examine associations between schools’ active environment score (derived from the school survey) and pupils’ physical activity, mental health and educational performance. For our cross-sectional study, we will recruit up to 1000 year-three children (aged 7–8 years). Our primary outcome is accelerometer (GENEActiv) assessed physical activity, our secondary outcomes are parent-reported child mental health (Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire) and teacher-reported educational performance (age-related expectations). Using multilevel mixed-effects regression models, we will examine associations between the active environment score and physical activity. Physical activity will be included as a measure of acceleration and also different intensities (light, moderate, vigorous). We will repeat this analysis to examine associations between the active environment score and mental health and educational performance. We will adjust for school characteristics and area-level deprivation and include pupil characteristics (eg, sex, ethnic group) as covariates. Clustering at the school level will be included as a random effect.

Ethical approval has been obtained from Imperial College Research Ethics Committee (ref: 6800895). Findings will be disseminated through a summary report to all participating schools, peer-reviewed publications, presentations at national and international conferences and National Institute for Health and Care Research policy briefings.

Transporting critically ill patients between medical facilities can be hazardous and costly. Whether by road, fixed-wing aircraft or helicopter, many professional associations have proposed strategies to efficiently and safely transport patients at high risk of instability. Although these strategies have been assessed in some studies, no comprehensive synthesis of their benefits has been conducted to date. The aim of this study is to assess the effect of strategies to improve the safety and costs of interhospital transports for critically ill patients.

We will conduct a systematic review according to the Cochrane guidelines. The review will include randomised controlled trials (RCTs), cohort studies and case-control studies assessing the effect of interventions to improve interhospital transports of critically ill patients on safety and costs. We will search multiple electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science, Cochrane Library) from inception to 6 months prior to the submission of the final manuscript. Screening by title and abstract, full-text screening, data extraction and quality assessment will be performed by two independent reviewers. We will assess the risk of bias with the Cochrane revised tool for RCTs and with the risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions tool. If possible, we will calculate pooled effect estimates and 95% CIs to assess the effect of the interventions. We will also assess heterogeneity using the I² index and rate the certainty of evidence with the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation tool and trial sequential analysis.

Ethics approval is not required for this review. The results of this systematic review will be shared through publication in a peer-reviewed journal, conference presentations and our network of knowledge user collaborators.

International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42024595080).