Recently, legal questions have increasingly arisen in intensive care medicine (ICM), especially when it comes to end-of-life decisions. Still, for Europe, there is not much evidence about doctors’ situational legal knowledge and legal education during medical studies and further qualification. The present study was initiated to analyse these hitherto unexplored aspects in Germany.

A quantitative online survey has been performed among German intensive care physicians. The voluntary participants of the anonymous online survey were asked to answer legal questions related to end-of-life policies, informed consent, surrogate decision making or advance directives. We tested pure factual knowledge in five questions. The other five questions tested situational knowledge using case vignettes. Every question could be answered with ‘yes’, ‘no’ or ‘do not know’. Furthermore, the participants were asked to assess their subjective certainty on a Likert scale and to provide information about their professional experience (PE) and qualification.

All members of the two German professional societies for anaesthesiology who work in ICM were asked to take part in the survey.

952 completed questionnaires were analysed. 86% of the participants were specialists, and 56% held the additional qualification in ICM. 78% had more than 10 years of general clinical experience, and 62% had more than 5 years of experience in ICM.

On average, the participants answered the five facts–questions in 90.8% correctly. However, only 73.6% of the five case vignettes were answered correctly. Specialists, physicians with a lot of PE or physicians holding the additional qualification in ICM did not perform better than assistants or physicians with little PE.

German intensive care physicians have relevant gaps regarding situational legal knowledge, which are independent of their PE or qualification and persist. This may be due to difficulties in interpretation and implementation of law. Since these knowledge gaps can lead to liability and criminal prosecution, these gaps should be closed through awareness-raising and continuous education.

Patients with chronic somatic diseases such as obesity often develop comorbid depressive symptoms. E-mental health interventions are an innovative and effective treatment option within a stepped care approach. Studies have shown that acceptance and adherence are higher when they are tailored to the specific needs of the target group. This study protocol describes a randomised controlled trial (RCT) of an internet-based self-help intervention, Fit4Mood, to improve mental health in the high-risk group of adults with obesity. The objective of the @ktivPLUS research project is to evaluate the effectiveness, acceptability and cost-effectiveness of the intervention in comparison to an online bibliotherapy.

Eligible individuals will be randomly allocated to an intervention group (access to an internet-based intervention) or to an active control group (access to an online bibliotherapy). Assessments will be conducted before the start of the intervention (baseline (BL)) and 4 months after BL (follow-up (FU)). The primary outcome is the reduction in depressive symptoms (Beck Depression Inventory-II) in n=190 participants. Secondary outcomes are anxiety, quality of life, activity, self-efficacy, resilience, mental and digital health literacy, stress, sleep quality, weight loss, weight management activities and readiness to lose weight, weight self-stigma, uptake, adherence and satisfaction with the intervention, workability and cost-effectiveness at follow-up. Additionally, sociodemographics, health, comorbidities and disabilities, as well as internet-specific information, will be assessed at BL. Intention-to-treat analysis using generalised linear mixed models will be applied.

Approval for this study has been granted by the ethics committee of the University of Leipzig (ID: 140/25-ek). All participants will provide informed consent prior to participation in the study. Results will be disseminated in peer-reviewed journals and presented at national and international conferences. In the case of a successful evaluation, the internet-based self-help intervention Fit4Mood will be provided as freeware, which will be easily accessible and free of charge.

The current RCT study has been registered at the German Clinical Trials Register (Identifier: DRKS00036178, Registered 24 June 2025; https://www.drks.de/search/de/trial/DRKS00036178).

To understand experiences of stigma and discrimination among adults who are homeless across multiple care and support system contexts.

Cross-sectional survey embedded within an ethnographic case study.

South London, UK, 2024.

Convenience sample of 74 people experiencing homelessness, aged over 18 years.

Participants most commonly reported unfair treatment in public settings (85%), legal settings (72%), housing and homelessness services (68%) and health settings (65%). These experiences were attributed to a range of factors and identities, with homelessness the most commonly cited; people commonly linked unfair experiences to multiple identities. People with more comorbidities reported experiencing unfair treatment across more system settings, including and beyond health systems.

Unfair treatment was reported across multiple care and support systems with greater ill-health associated with more unfair treatment. Future larger-scale surveys should measure the extent of stigma and discrimination across the population.