While paediatric cardiac arrest is a rare event, consequences for the patients are significant with a considerable risk of morbidity, disability and mortality. The risk of cardiac arrest is substantially increased in children with congenital heart disease. Nevertheless, there is a lack of data concerning this population. To close this knowledge gap, this multicentre, prospective, open registry aims to implement a standardised structure for data collection and follow-up of paediatric cardiac arrests associated with heart diseases in Germany.

All paediatric patients who experience a cardiac arrest and receive at least 2 minutes of cardiopulmonary resuscitation are invited to participate in this registry. The dataset comprises demographical, clinical, resuscitation and outcome data, collected in accordance with the Utstein guidelines. Neurological assessments, cognitive and motor tests are conducted at fixed intervals. Additionally, patient-reported outcome measures will be surveyed. Primary outcomes are survival to discharge and neurodevelopmental outcome after discharge and 2 years. The data are pseudonymised prior to submission to an online REDCap database, which is centrally hosted on a server located in Leipzig, Germany.

This study follows the Declaration of Helsinki and received ethical approval from the Ethics Committee in Leipzig. Registry results will allow us to understand the epidemiology, guideline adherence, risk factors and will be presented at conferences and submitted to a peer-reviewed journal for publication.

NCT05373498.

Equitable access to healthcare technology is a major public health issue. For adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D), continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) technology can improve diabetes self-management and clinical outcomes. Even though CGM is now recommended by professional guidelines for all patients with diabetes on insulin therapy, evidence suggests that CGM is underutilised and inequitably prescribed across health systems. As CGM is an emergent technology, it is vital to understand what approaches have been studied to overcome inequities in CGM access for adults with T2D, what aspects of equitable access have yet to be addressed and what are facilitators and barriers to CGM access at the individual, facility and health system levels.

We will use the Joanna Briggs Institute’s revised scoping review framework to conduct our analysis. The protocol is registered with Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/z2exn). We will search for peer-reviewed literature containing empirical evidence for the facilitators and barriers to equitable access to CGM technology for patients with T2D. Findings will be organised according to research objectives and the Framework for Digital Health Equity, and summarised using narrative synthesis of descriptive statistics for quantitative findings, and themes for qualitative findings. This review will be conducted and reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses for Scoping Reviews.

The findings from this review will provide valuable information and support for future research into the equitable implementation and use of CGM for patients with T2D. We will disseminate findings at conferences and publish in a peer-reviewed journal.

https://osf.io/z2exn.

To determine the independent predictors of full immunisation coverage (FIC) among children aged 12–23 months along with the parental awareness and attitudes (of children aged ≤23 months) regarding routine childhood vaccinations in Perambalur district of Tamil Nadu, South India.

A community-based cross-sectional analysis.

Perambalur district situated in the central region of Tamil Nadu state, South India.

Parents of children aged ≤23 months.

The primary outcome measured was the FIC and FIC plus in the district along with the parental awareness and attitudes regarding routine childhood vaccinations. The independent predictors of FIC and FIC plus were determined using multivariable logistic regression models.

The study included 652 children, with a mean (±SD) age of 16.47 (±6.37) months and a male-to-female ratio of 60:40. The FIC and FIC plus of children aged 12–23 months were 91.3% (95% CI 88.64 to 93.33) and 79.7% (95% CI 76.15 to 82.80), respectively. The immunisation card retention was 97.9% among the parents of children aged 12–23 months. The independent predictors of FIC included below poverty line families (adjusted OR (AOR) 0.11; 95% CI 0.02 to 0.64), illiteracy among mothers (AOR 0.67; 95% CI 0.32 to 0.87), lack of immunisation card (AOR 0.14; 95% CI 0.03 to 0.55), lack of frequent home visits by healthcare worker (AOR 0.38; 95% CI 0.18 to 0.79) and hesitancy of parents towards vaccination (AOR 0.26; 95% CI 0.12 to 0.87).

This study revealed a high FIC in this specific district. However, achieving full coverage is influenced by factors like socioeconomic status, maternal education and parental attitudes. Understanding these factors is essential for improving immunisation rates and ensuring all children are protected.

Using the community-based participatory research (CBPR) methodology, sustained peer group treatment has effectively improved medication adherence. Although many studies investigate the effectiveness of peer group therapy, there is a lack of evidence addressing the cost-effectiveness of CBPR models in low- and middle-income countries. This protocol outlines the methods for the economic evaluation of the PArticipatory Research model for medicaTIon adherenCe In People with diAbetes and hyperTEnsion (PARTICIPATE) trial to determine whether the CBPR approach to enhance medication adherence among patients with diabetes and/or hypertension is cost-effective in India.

A within-trial cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) from a societal perspective will be conducted alongside a multicentre cluster randomised controlled trial to identify, measure and evaluate the key resource and outcome impacts of a CBPR model compared with usual care aimed at improving medication adherence in adult rural Indian patients with diabetes and/or hypertension. The CEA will provide results in terms of the cost per improvement in medication adherence score, and a cost-utility analysis (CUA) will express the findings as the cost per disability-adjusted life year (DALY) or quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained. Intervention costs and effects will be projected for the population of Indian adults with diabetes and/or hypertension who are on medication, analysed over the cohort’s lifetime. Results from the modelled CUA will detail incremental costs, costs per death averted and costs per DALY averted/QALY gained for the interventions relative to the comparator. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios will be computed by dividing the cost difference between the intervention and comparator by the difference in benefits. Health economic evaluation methods, including a lifetime horizon, a 3% discount rate for costs and benefits and a societal perspective, will be followed. The effects of sampling uncertainty on estimated incremental costs and effectiveness parameters, as well as the influence of methodological assumptions (such as the discount rate and study perspective), will be examined through both deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. Relevant differences in costs, outcomes or cost-effectiveness disparities among subgroups of patients with varying baseline characteristics will also be reported. Results will be illustrated using cost-effectiveness acceptability curves across a range of willingness-to-pay thresholds. Modelled CUA will broaden the target population and time frame to offer decision-makers insights into the cost-effectiveness of the CBPR approach for enhancing medication adherence. Furthermore, a return on investment analysis will be performed to express benefits in monetary terms relative to investments made, allowing for a comprehensive expression of both costs and the full spectrum of intervention benefits in monetary units.

The Institutional Ethics Committee of Sri Aurobindo Medical College and PGI, Indore, provided ethics approval. The results of the main trial and economic evaluation will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal and disseminated through reports to Indian Council of Medical Research and conference presentations.

Clinical Trial Registry of India (CTRI) CTRI/2024/01/061939.

Liver cirrhosis accounts for over 10 000 deaths in the UK each year with a total loss of 60 000 quality-adjusted life-years. There is a substantial cost to the NHS of £4.5 billion, with new liver-related decompensation events accounting for the majority of this. Following an acute cirrhosis decompensating event, there is a significant risk of hospital readmission with 90-day readmission rates as high as 53%. Current care in the UK is reactive and patients are often only readmitted when they have presented acutely as an emergency with significant decompensation.

CirrhoCare is a prospective, multicentre, randomised controlled trial comparing the CirrhoCare management system with standard-of-care for high-risk cirrhosis patients who have been discharged following an admission with acute decompensation. The CirrhoCare management system comprises a novel digital platform for use in a patient’s home, designed to proactively detect the first signs of new decompensation in patients with established cirrhosis, discharged to the community. This enables a clinician to instigate early community-based care or, if needed, to triage the patient for hospital interventions.

214 patients will be recruited to the CirrhoCare trial from at least 12 UK centres. Patients will be randomised on a 1:1 ratio allocation to the CirrhoCare Management System or standard of care. Participants who are randomised to CirrhoCare will receive a CirrhoCare health kit comprising a smart watch, smart phone with enabled SIM (Subscriber Identity Module) network card, blood pressure monitor, weighing scales and thermometer. Participants will take measurements every morning Monday to Friday and will be followed up for 90 days postdischarge.

The primary objective of this study is to assess the clinical effectiveness of the CirrhoCare digital management system. We hypothesise that its early community-based intervention will reduce the number of unplanned hospital interventions and admissions and prevent liver-related complications when compared with standard-of-care management.

CirrhoCare is a National Institute for Health and Care Research-funded study (NCT06223893). The study has UK Research Ethics Committee and Health Research Authority (HRA) approvals, with approval granted by the HRA and Health and Care Research Wales committee. The results of this study will be published in peer review journals, disseminated at international conferences as well as established Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement networks.

ISRCTN11380842.