Post-COVID-19 syndrome (PCS) is characterised by persistent symptoms, such as fatigue, dyspnoea, depression and sleep problems, following SARS-CoV-2 infection. The long-term course and impact on quality of life remain unclear. This review aims to synthesise evidence on longitudinal changes in symptom prevalence, severity and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in adults with PCS.

This systematic review will include longitudinal studies (randomised controlled trials, non-randomised trials, prospective and retrospective cohort studies) of adults (≥18 years) with PCS, defined by symptoms persisting beyond 4 weeks after acute infection. Eligible studies must report changes in prevalence or severity of fatigue, dyspnoea, depression, sleep problems or HRQoL from baseline to at least one follow-up visit.

We will systematically search MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Scopus, CINAHL and Epistemonikos, with no restrictions on language, date or publication status. Two reviewers will independently screen studies, extract data and assess risk of bias using validated tools appropriate to study design. Disagreements will be resolved by consensus or a third reviewer.

A narrative synthesis will summarise study characteristics and symptom trajectories. Where sufficient data are available, random-effects meta-analyses will be conducted to estimate pooled changes in symptom prevalence (ORs), severity ((standardised) mean differences) and HRQoL ((standardised) mean differences). Meta-regression and subgroup analyses will explore potential effect modifiers. Certainty of evidence will be evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.

No ethical approval is required. Findings will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publication, conference presentations and plain language summaries.

CRD420251011612.

Accurate estimates of the burden of vaccine-preventable community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) hospitalisations both overall and due to the most frequent and vaccine-preventable pathogens are needed to inform the use of respiratory vaccines in adults.

This was a prospective, population-based CAP surveillance study at three hospitals in Germany. All patients admitted with clinically suspected CAP were tested for Streptococcus pneumoniae using urine antigen tests and for respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), influenza virus and SARS-CoV-2 using multiplex PCR from nasopharyngeal swabs. Incidence rate calculations for all-cause CAP were based on eligible patients, regardless of enrolment status.

Individuals admitted to study hospitals within the surveillance period with suspected or confirmed diagnosis of pneumonia who provided informed consent.

Radiologically confirmed (RAD) CAP.

Active surveillance between 1 January 2021 and 30 June 2023 identified at the three study sites 4319 adults with RAD-CAP that met eligibility criteria, of which 1479 (34.2%) were enrolled and included in the analysis for pathogen distribution. The main reason for non-enrolment was the inability to provide informed consent. Incidence estimates were based on 1254 study-eligible individuals admitted at the largest study site. SARS-CoV-2, S. pneumoniae, RSV or influenza were identified in 36.5%, 9.1%, 3.7% and 1.8% of patients with RAD-CAP, respectively. Serotypes included in the 20-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine were detected in 6.9% of RAD-CAP and 76.0% of pneumococcal CAP. The overall adjusted annual incidence of all-cause RAD-CAP over the study period was 490/100 000 (95% CI 461 to 521). The incidence of pneumococcal and RSV-related RAD-CAP increased 8.6-fold and 10.0-fold over the study period, resulting in an incidence of 60/100 000 (95% CI 45 to 75) and 30/100 000 (95% CI 19 to 41) in 2022/2023, respectively, while SARS-CoV-2 related RAD-CAP declined by 70% to 97/100 000 (95% CI 78 to 116).

Active pneumonia surveillance reported a high burden of RAD-CAP hospitalisations in Germany, especially among older adults. The resurgence of CAP due to RSV, S. pneumoniae or influenza, alongside maintained activity of SARS-CoV-2, was associated with an overall increase of RAD-CAP among adults.

Respiratory diseases affect millions of people in the UK, with a disproportionately high burden seen among many marginalised communities. They are the third leading cause of death in the UK and a major driver of morbidity, disability and healthcare service use. Many respiratory conditions cause debilitating symptoms and deterioration in patients’ health and quality of life over time, resulting in substantial increases in National Health Service (NHS) expenditure. Social inequalities, including occupational, housing and environmental disparities, have led to a disproportionate burden of respiratory disease among the Black community. For many Black people living in the UK, respiratory conditions have been under-recognised, misdiagnosed or inadequately treated, further contributing to disparities in health outcomes. Despite the need to address these urgent challenges, research in this area is fragmented and rarely informed by the views and opinions of those most affected. Research prioritisation provides a structured methodology to address this unmet need. The Equal Breath Priority Setting Partnership (PSP) aims to identify the 10 most urgent research priorities in respiratory health for people of Black heritage through meaningful collaboration with people with lived experience of respiratory disease, their caregivers and family members and the healthcare professionals caring for them.

The top 10 research priorities for the Equal Breath PSP will be established using the James Lind Alliance (JLA) method. A steering group comprising approximately 12 people from key stakeholder groups will first be assembled to guide the PSP. Once the context and scope of the PSP has been agreed, the first survey will be developed and disseminated among stakeholder communities to identify evidence uncertainties. Data analysis of the survey responses will create summary questions and critical appraisal of available evidence will verify which of these are evidence gaps. A longlist of approximately 50 summary questions derived from the first survey will be shared with stakeholders in a second shortlisting survey. The highest ranking questions from this survey will be taken into a workshop where the top 10 research priorities will be established through a consensus process.

This PSP employs the JLA methodology, which does not constitute research as defined by the Health Research Authority. Survey respondent data will be stored in accordance with UK General Data Protection Regulation by Asthma+Lung UK. The final 10 research priorities will be shared with funders, policymakers, professional bodies and relevant communities to inform future investment and promote equity in respiratory health.

The objective was to assess whether frailty is associated with an increased risk of postoperative delirium (POD) in intensive care unit (ICU) patients aged 65 years and older.

A systematic review was conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis guidelines. MEDLINE (via PubMed) and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies published between August 2014 and January 2025, assessing frailty with validated instruments and reporting POD during ICU stay. While the search strategy was not limited to a specific study design, only observational studies met the inclusion criteria. Study quality was appraised using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). Due to methodological heterogeneity, results were synthesised narratively.

This review targeted the intensive care setting specifically, including studies conducted in hospital-based ICUs in various countries.

Of 655 records, five studies (n=3045) met inclusion criteria. Frailty prevalence ranged from 10% to 34.9%. Tools used included the Fried Frailty Scale, modified Frailty Index (mFI), FRAIL Scale (Fatigue, Resistance, Ambulation, Illnesses, and Loss of weight), Comprehensive Assessment of Frailty and Edmonton Frailty Scale. Frail patients had higher POD incidence and experienced more complications such as acute kidney injury, prolonged mechanical ventilation and reoperation. NOS scores ranged from 5 to 7, indicating moderate quality.

Frailty appears to be associated with an increased risk of POD in ICU patients aged 65 and older. Given the limited number and heterogeneity of studies, further research is needed to validate this relationship and to inform targeted prevention strategies in critical care.

https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/7TWQ8

Infant feeding practices in the first 2 years of life are linked to long-term weight trajectories. Despite the importance of obesity prevention interventions, there are no randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating early childhood education and care (ECEC) and primary caregiver-targeted interventions on child weight and feeding outcomes.

To assess the efficacy of an 18-month digital health intervention (Tiny Bites) delivered to ECEC services and primary caregivers of children aged 4 to ≤12 months on child age-adjusted and sex-adjusted body mass index-for-age z-score (zBMI) relative to usual care control in the Hunter New England (HNE) region of New South Wales, Australia.

This type 1 hybrid cluster RCT will include up to 60 ECEC services and 540 children/caregiver dyads. The intervention supports ECEC services and caregivers to deliver recommended responsive feeding practices to infants. ECEC services will receive access to an online assessment platform, training and resources, and implementation support. Primary caregivers will receive text messages, monthly e-newsletters, online links and direct communication from ECEC services. We will assess the impact on child zBMI at 18-month follow-up. Secondary outcomes include duration of consuming any breastmilk, child diet and caregiver responsive feeding practices. We will also assess ECEC policy and practice implementation related to targeted feeding practices, programme cost effectiveness, adverse effects and engagement with the programme (ECECs and caregivers). For the primary outcome, between-group differences will be assessed for paired data using two-level hierarchical linear regression models.

Ethics approval has been provided by HNE Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC) (2023/ETH01158), Deakin University (2024-202) and University of Newcastle HREC (R-2024-0039). Trial results will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals, presented at scientific conferences locally and internationally and to relevant practice stakeholders.

ACTRN12624000576527.

There is an absence of real-world evidence, especially from low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), on the implementation successes and challenges of COVID-19 Test and Treat (T&T) programmes. In 2022, nirmatrelvir/ritonavir was provided as standard of care for mild to moderate COVID-19 treatment in eight LMICs (Ghana, Kenya, Laos, Malawi, Nigeria, Rwanda, Uganda and Zambia). This manuscript describes a research protocol to study novel drug introduction during the COVID-19 health emergency, with implications and learnings for future pandemic preparedness. The goal of the study is to provide simultaneous programme learnings and improvements with programme rollout, to fill a gap in real-world implementation data on T&T programmes of oral antiviral treatment for COVID-19 and inform programme implementation and scale-up in other LMICs.

This multiple methods implementation research study is divided into three components to address key operational research objectives: (1) programme learnings, monitoring and evaluation; (2) patient-level programme impact; and (3) key stakeholder perspectives. Data collection will occur for a minimum of 6 months in each country up to the end of grant. Quantitative data will be analysed using descriptive statistics for each country and then aggregated across the programme countries. Stakeholder perspectives will be examined using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research implementation science framework and semistructured interviews.

This study was approved by the Duke University Institutional Review Board (Pro00111388). The study was also approved by the local institutional review boards in each country participating in individual-level data collection (objectives 2 and 3): Ghana, Malawi, Rwanda, Nigeria and Zambia. The study’s findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals and disseminated through dialogue events, national and international conferences and through social media.

NCT06360783.

Heart failure (HF) is a debilitating condition associated with high morbidity, mortality and healthcare resource use. Frailty in HF patients is associated with poorer outcomes, including increased morbidity, mortality and reduced quality of life (QoL). Nutritional disorders, such as malnutrition, are common in patients with HF and contribute to functional decline and increased mortality. The Meta-Analysis Global Group in Chronic HF (MAGGIC) risk score was developed to predict 1-year and 3-year hospitalization and mortality in patients with HF. This study aims to assess the added value of frailty, QoL and nutritional status to the MAGGIC risk score.

This prospective cohort study, conducted at a tertiary public hospital in southern Brazil, will include 316 patients with chronic HF who are followed up at the HF Outpatient Clinic. Frailty will be assessed using the Fried scale, health-related QoL will be assessed using the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ) and nutritional status will be assessed using the Mini Nutritional Assessment. These variables will be incorporated into the MAGGIC risk score. Continuous variables with a normal distribution will be described as mean±SD, skewed variables as median±IQR and categorical variables as absolute and relative frequencies. Survival analysis will be performed using the Kaplan-Meier method with log-rank test comparisons. The prognostic value of frailty, its components, the MLHFQ score and nutritional status will be assessed by Cox regression, which will be adjusted for the MAGGIC risk score. Net Reclassification Improvement and Integrated Discrimination Improvement will assess the accuracy of the MAGGIC score when including frailty, MLHFQ and nutritional status. A p value

This study adheres to the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Institutional Committee for Scientific Ethics and Research (No 20220558) and the Brazilian Government Registry (No 66474223200005327). The data will be available on reasonable request from the corresponding author. The results will be disseminated via peer-reviewed manuscripts and shown at national and international conferences.